Mark Noble for John Stockdale (Publisher) the History of London and Its Environs, Volume 2 London 1811

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mark Noble for John Stockdale (Publisher) the History of London and Its Environs, Volume 2 London 1811 Mark Noble for John Stockdale (publisher) The history of London and its environs, volume 2 London 1811 THE HISTORY OF LONDON, AND ITS Environs: CONTAINING AN ACCOUNT OF THE ORIGIN OF THE CITY; ITS STATE UNDER THE ROMANS, SAXONS, DANES, AND NORMANS; ITS RISE AND PROGRESS To its Present State of Commercial Greatness: INCLUDING AN HISTORICAL RECORD OF EVERY IMPORTANT AND INTERESTING PUBLIC EVENT, FROM THE LANDING OF JULIUS CAESAR TO THE PRESENT PERIOD; ALSO, A DESCRIPTION OF ITS ANTIQUITIES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND ESTABLISHMENTS; OF THE REVOLUTIONS IN ITS GOVERNMENT; AND OF THE CALAMITIES TO WHICH ITS INHABITANTS HAVE BEEN SUBJECT BY FIRE, FAMINE, PESTILENCE, &c. LIKEWISE AN ACCOUNT OF ALL THE TOWNS, VILLAGES, AND COUNTRY, WITHIN TWENTY-FIVE MILES OF LONDON. BY THE LATE REV. HENRY HUNTER, D. D. AND OTHER GENTLEMEN. Embellished with Maps, Plans, and Views. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. II. LONDON: PRINTED FOR JOHN STOCKDALE, PICCADILLY. By S. Gosnell, Little Queen-Street, Holborn. 1811. ... 155 KENT. GREENWICH. HAVING in a preceding part of this work taken a general survey of the county of Kent, with regard to its rivers, agriculture, and population, we now pro- ceed to a particular description of such places as from local or other circumstances most deserve our notice, and seem necessarily to fall within the limits of our under- taking. It is not remarkable that the town of Greenwich should first present itself, whe- ther we consider its proud connexion with the metropolis; its situation on the river, than which nothing can impress foreigners with a more striking idea of our progress in every civilized art; or the noble institution of its hospital, majestic in its appear- ance, and the benevolent object of which is so widely and so effectually diffused. According to the best and most authentic writers, Greenwich received its name from its situation on the banks of the river. In Saxon it was Grenawic, or the Green Town; in Latin, Grenovicum. In the reign of Henry V. it was a mean fishing town, but was in great esteem for the secure harbour it afforded to ships. It was in this place that for four succeeding years the Danish fleet remained, whilst their army occupied the eminence above. Greenwich is in the hundred of Blackheath; its manor was in possession of the monks till the time of Henry the Eighth, who annexed it to the crown, where it remained till the time of Charles the First: it was then sequestered for the benefit of the state; but at the Restoration it reverted to the crown, with which it has since continued. To enter minutely into its history till it became a royal residence, can be neither interesting nor important. The first period on record of its having been honoured by containing a palace for our princes was about the year 1300. From that time till the reign of Charles the Second it was the scene of royal mag- nificence and courtly splendour. The palace was extended and improved by Hum- phrey duke of Gloucester – Edward the Fourth added to its grandeur. In this place Henry the Eighth was born, and it was ever the favourite abode of this great and powerful sovereign. Greenwich was also the birth-place of queen Mary and her sister Elizabeth, and 156 the latter princess particularly preferred it as the place of her summer residence. The last of our monarchs who inhabited Greenwich palace was Charles the First, though it was occasionally visited by the Protector, and, after him, by Charles the Second. It was in the reign of William and Mary that the plan of converting the palace into an hospital for disabled seamen first originated. This was progressively extended, meliorated, and improved, till it became what it now remains, a truly magnificent monument of national liberality and benevolence. This noble institution provides for the relief and support of seamen for the royal navy, who from wounds or other circumstances are unqualified for farther service at sea, or unable to maintain themselves. But its benevolence does not ter- minate here – there is provision also for the maintenance of the widows of such seamen, and the education of the children of such as shall be killed or disabled in the service of their country. The following account of this noble edifice is suc- cinct and abridged, but we trust it will be found sufficiently comprehensive. Greenwich Hospital. – This noble institution was founded, not on the ruins of a royal palace, but has by gradual steps grown out of one, till it has eclipsed, both in extent and external magnificence, many of those at present existing, and which are now occupied by royal or imperial tenants. On its site originally stood the ancient royal palace called Placentia, built by Humphrey duke of Gloucester, in the reign of Henry the Sixth. It was taken by Edward the Fourth, who deposed that monarch, into the hands of the crown, where it remained, having experienced a variety of additions under different sovereigns, till the reign of king Charles the Second. Being then found extremely decayed by time, and the want of necessary repairs, it was dismantled soon after the Restoration, and the erection of one on a more magnificent plan undertaken. It remained, however, with many other build- ings of the same aera and description, in a very unfinished state, at the accession of king James the Second, under whom every thing of this nature continued dormant. It was by royal grant from king William and queen Mary, bearing date on the 20th of October, in the sixth year of their reign, conveyed to certain commis- sioners, of whom the great officers of state formed a part, for the purpose of being converted to the noble purpose, which in a more enlarged extent it has ever since been applied to. Its original foundation extended only to the reception of three or four hundred seamen; the alterations and additions to the original building necessary to this pur- 157 pose were completed under the superintendance of Sir Christopher Wren, in the year 1698, and now constitute the north-west pile or building of the four which at the present period collectively form this stupendous erection. Scarce was this first part of the noble undertaking carried into execution, when, to the great honour of national liberality, a building since called queen Anne’s was planned and undertaken. It is opposite to that erected by king Charles, and preserves in its principal fronts, the west and north, the same exterior. The foundation of a third pile called king William’s, was laid nearly at the same time on the south-west. It contains that superb apartment, the great dining or painted hall, the decorations of which were executed by Sir James Thornhill, and was originally designed by the architect Sir Christopher Wren, for the use of the officers and men. It has, however, long ceased to be applied to that purpose, the men dining in spacious halls on the lower story, and the officers in their own apartments. In 1699 the foundation of the eastern colonnade, attached to that quadrangle since called queen Mary’s building, was laid; and without entering into a tedious reca- pitulation of dates, the whole building was finished, nearly in its present form, about the year 1752. Considerable sums have at different times been bequeathed and given by various persons for this highly honourable purpose, and the deficiency has been made good either by parliamentary grants, or the appropriated rents and profits of estates forfeited by families of rank heretofore engaged in rebellion. Among these, the possessions of the unfortunate earl of Derwentwater form a con- spicuous and principal part. The hospital, thus divided into four distinct piles, each of which forms an oblong square with its fronts outwards, contains, by some recent additions and internal improvements, derived particularly from the erection of an infirmary, independent of the hospital itself, nearly two thousand four hundred pensioners, exclusive of their different officers, necessary as well for their government as their comfort. To the northward, adjoining to the river Thames, is the principal or grand square, the width nearly 280 feet, bounded on the north by the grand parade or wall washed by the river; on the east and west, by the grand fronts of the quadran- gles, named in honour of king Charles and queen Anne; and on the south by a flight of steps extending the whole length, in consequence of their more elevated 158 situation between king William and queen Mary’s buildings, as well as in a small degree by the east and west corners of those stupendous piles. In the centre is the statue of his late majesty king George the Second in white marble, executed by Rysbrack, and highly esteemed by all judges of sculpture. Upon the whole, the magnificent appearance of the different buildings when viewed on the north side from the Thames, has never in any part of the world been hitherto equalled in a similar erection. The annexed view, taken from the north side of the Thames, will give some idea of the magnitude of the building. On the 1st of January 1779, a most dreadful fire, occasioned by causes never hitherto known, or at least made public, broke out in a part of queen Mary’s build- ing, as is generally supposed, above the chapel. By the greatest exertions it was in a few hours got under, though not till it had entirely consumed the chapel itself, and as many of the adjacent wards as were capable of containing nearly five hun- dred pensioners.
Recommended publications
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Allington Castle Conway
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society \ u"*_; <Ak_CL <&__•_ •E!**?f*K- TOff*^ ^ i if •P%% —5** **•"'. • . " ft - . if • i ' _! ' ' •_• .' |• > ' V ''% .; fl y H H i Pko^o.l ALLINGTON CASTLE (A): GENERAL VIEW FROM E. [W. ff.-B. ( 337 ) ALLINGTON CASTLE. BY SIR W. MARTIN CONWAY, M.A., E.S.A. THE immediate neighbourhood of Allington Castle appears to have been a very ancient site of human habitation. It lies close to what must have been an important ford over the Medway, at a point which was approximately the head of low-tide navigation. The road from the east, which debouches on the right bank of the river close beside the present Malta Inn, led straight to the ford, and its continua- tion on the other bank can be traced as a deep furrow through the Lock Wood, and almost as far as the church, though in part it has recently been obliterated by the dejection of quarry debris. This ancient road may be traced up to the Pilgrims' Way, from which it branched off. In the neighbourhood of the castle, at points not exactly recorded, late Celtic burials have been discovered containing remains of the Aylesford type. Where there were burials there was no doubt a settlement. In Roman days the site was likewise well occupied, and the buried ruins of a Roman villa are marked on the ordnance map in the field west of the castle. The site seems to be indicated by a level place on the sloping hill, and when the land in question falls into my hands I propose to make the researches necessary to reveal the situation and character of the villa.
    [Show full text]
  • Document in Detail: Diocese of Canterbury Medieval Fragments
    Issue 10, Summer 2018 Kent Archives is set for a busy summer. In this edition of our newsletter we introduce you to our joint project with Findmypast to digitise our parish register collection. The image in our header is from the first Cranbrook parish composite register [ref. P100/1/A/1], and is just one of the thousands of registers that will be digitised. We are also in the middle of transferring the remaining historic records of the Diocese of Canterbury from Canterbury Cathedral Archives to the Kent History and Library Centre to join its probate records, which have been held by Kent Archives since 1946. At the same time, archive cataloguing of one of Maidstone’s major papermaking collections is nearly complete; further World War I commemorative activities are underway; and work continues on the Catalogue Transfer Project and Manorial Documents Register Project for Kent. Document in Detail: Diocese of Canterbury Medieval Fragments [DCb/PRC/50/5] Mark Ballard, Archive Service Officer Among many other records of great value within the records of Canterbury Diocese are the ‘medieval fragments’ [DCb/PRC/49 and DCb/PRC/50], which in the post-Reformation period came to be used as covers, or ‘end-parchments’, for the probate registers. If we can judge by the dates of the act books and wills and inventories registers they covered, this recycling became a habit during the episcopate of Archbishop Matthew Parker (1559-1575). It is perhaps ironic that at precisely the time that Thomas Tallis and William Byrd, probably both closet Roman Catholics, were still being employed to write motets for the Chapel Royal, such disrespectful treatment was being accorded at Canterbury to their medieval predecessors.
    [Show full text]
  • CHURCH: Dates of Confirmation/Consecration
    Court: Women at Court; Royal Household. p.1: Women at Court. Royal Household: p.56: Gentlemen and Grooms of the Privy Chamber; p.59: Gentlemen Ushers. p.60: Cofferer and Controller of the Household. p.61: Privy Purse and Privy Seal: selected payments. p.62: Treasurer of the Chamber: selected payments; p.63: payments, 1582. p.64: Allusions to the Queen’s family: King Henry VIII; Queen Anne Boleyn; King Edward VI; Queen Mary Tudor; Elizabeth prior to her Accession. Royal Household Orders. p.66: 1576 July (I): Remembrance of charges. p.67: 1576 July (II): Reformations to be had for diminishing expenses. p.68: 1577 April: Articles for diminishing expenses. p.69: 1583 Dec 7: Remembrances concerning household causes. p.70: 1598: Orders for the Queen’s Almoners. 1598: Orders for the Queen’s Porters. p.71: 1599: Orders for supplying French wines to the Royal Household. p.72: 1600: Thomas Wilson: ‘The Queen’s Expenses’. p.74: Marriages: indexes; miscellaneous references. p.81: Godchildren: indexes; miscellaneous references. p.92: Deaths: chronological list. p.100: Funerals. Women at Court. Ladies and Gentlewomen of the Bedchamber and the Privy Chamber. Maids of Honour, Mothers of the Maids; also relatives and friends of the Queen not otherwise included, and other women prominent in the reign. Close friends of the Queen: Katherine Astley; Dorothy Broadbelt; Lady Cobham; Anne, Lady Hunsdon; Countess of Huntingdon; Countess of Kildare; Lady Knollys; Lady Leighton; Countess of Lincoln; Lady Norris; Elizabeth and Helena, Marchionesses of Northampton; Countess of Nottingham; Blanche Parry; Katherine, Countess of Pembroke; Mary Radcliffe; Lady Scudamore; Lady Mary Sidney; Lady Stafford; Countess of Sussex; Countess of Warwick.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Tower – Final Interpretation Plan
    Jewel Tower FINAL Interpretation Plan Curatorial Department 2012/13 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Site summary and context of the plan 1.2 Project team 2. History of the site 2.1 Summary 2.2 History of the building and important associations 2.3 Description and features 2.4 Points of significance 3. Conservation management 3.1 Designations 3.2 Condition survey 3.3 Conservation issues 3.4 Parameters for new interpretation 4. Collections 4.1 Summary of collections 4.2 Collections conservation 5. Audiences 5.1 Visitor numbers 5.2 Analysis 5.3 Education visits 5.4 Neighbouring attractions 5.5 Target audiences 6. Existing interpretation and visitor experience 6.1 Audit of current interpretation 6.2 Guidebook 6.3 Events 6.4 Website 7. Interpretation proposals 7.1 Themes 7.2 Interpretation approach 7.3 The scheme 7.4 Maintenance 8. Appendices i) Future work ii) Copy of visitor questionnaire and results iii) Collections in store iv) Activity sheet v) Education visits at the Houses of Parliament vi) Site plan 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site summary and context of the plan The Jewel Tower is a three storey building lying opposite the Houses of Parliament in the heart of London. It was built around 1365 to house Edward III’s personal treasure as part of the palace at Westminster, and is one of the few buildings from this complex to survive today. In the 17th century, the Jewel Tower became the record office for the Houses of Lords and from 1869, it was the home of the Weights and Measures office, which set standards used across the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    Biodiversity Action Plan 2015-2018 Public March 2015 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3 About Us .......................................................................................................... 3 What is biodiversity? ........................................................................................... 3 Drivers for the Biodiversity Action Plan ................................................................... 3 Focus on Special Sites of Scientific Interest (SSSIs) .................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 6 Biodiversity Achievements and Measures to Date .................................................. 7 Environmental Management System (EMS) ............................................................. 7 Partnership ....................................................................................................... 7 Operational Response at Designated Sites............................................................... 7 Waste and Recycling Sites.................................................................................... 8 Procurement ..................................................................................................... 9 Estate Management ............................................................................................ 9 New Builds and Major Refurbishments ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) Within the Borough
    LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION REPORT DECEMBER 2016 Table of contents Bexley sites of importance for nature conservation PART I. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 Purpose and format of this document ................................................................................ 5 Bexley context ................................................................................................................... 5 What is biodiversity? ......................................................................................................... 6 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) ....................................................... 6 Strategic green wildlife corridors ....................................................................................... 8 Why has London Borough of Bexley adopted a new SINC assessment? ........................ 10 PART II. Site-by-site review ......................................................................................... 12 Sites of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation ....................................... 13 M015 Lesnes Abbey Woods and Bostall Woods ........................................................... 13 M031 the River Thames and tidal tributaries ................................................................. 15 M041 Erith Marshes ...................................................................................................... 19 M105
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of the House of Crevequer
    The fall of the house of Crevequer Colin Flight In about the year 1250, on occasions when he had his children and grand- children gathered around him at Leeds Castle, Hamo de Crevequer might have been excused for thinking that his family’s future was secure. Hamo was in his sixties by this time, and had been lord of the barony of Creve- quer for more than thirty years. He had been married twice. By his first wife, long since dead, he had three grown-up sons; the eldest of these, named Hamo like his father, was himself already married and the father of three sons. Hamo’s second wife, Matildis, was the only daughter of Willelm de Averenches, lord of the barony of Folkestone, or, as it was of- ten called, the barony of Averenches. When Willelm died, in 1230, he left an under-age son – Matildis’s younger brother, named Willelm like his fa- ther – as the prospective heir; but the son died, still under age, in 1235–6, and Matildis at once became the sole heir to her father’s barony. Since then, in right of his wife, Hamo had been in possession of the barony of Averenches, together with his own. This second marriage produced a sec- ond brood of children, including a son named Willelm (like his grandfa- ther). Sooner rather than later, Hamo would have to die; but he seemed to have done more than enough to perpetuate the family name. The younger Hamo stood ready to inherit the barony of Crevequer. Of course he would have no claim on his step-mother’s inheritance, the barony of Averenches; but his half-brother, Willelm, stood in line for that.
    [Show full text]
  • Tna Prob 11/27/398
    THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/27/398 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the Prerogative Court of Canterbury copy of the will, dated 28 October 1538 and proved 23 January 1539, of Alice Boleyn Clere (c.1487 - 1 November 1538), whose grandson, Sir Edward Clere (15 June 1536 – 8 June 1606), purchased Oxford’s manor of Weybourne. FAMILY BACKGROUND For the Boleyn family, see: Francis Blomefield, 'Hundred of South Erpingham: Blickling', in An Essay Towards A Topographical History of the County of Norfolk: Volume 6 (London, 1807), pp. 381-409. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/topographical-hist- norfolk/vol6/pp381-409 [accessed 30 December 2017]. The testatrix was the daughter of Sir William Boleyn (c.1451-1505) and Margaret Butler (d. before 20 March 1540), younger daughter and co-heiress of Thomas Butler (d. 3 August 1515), 7th Earl of Ormond, by his first wife, Anne Hankford (1431 – 13 November 1485), daughter and co-heiress of Sir Richard Hankford by his second wife, Anne Montagu, eldest daughter of John de Montagu, 3rd Earl of Salisbury. See Richardson, Douglas, Plantagenet Ancestry, 2nd ed., 2011, Vol. I, pp. 455-7 (hereafter PA). The testatrix is said to have had six brothers and four sisters: -Thomas Boleyn (c.1477 – 12 March 1539), Earl of Wiltshire and Ormond, who married Elizabeth Howard (d.1538), eldest daughter of Thomas Howard (1443-1524), 2nd Duke of Norfolk, by his first wife, Elizabeth Tilney (d. 3 April 1538), daughter and heiress of Frederick Tilney, esquire, by whom he was the father of three sons, Henry Boleyn, Thomas Boleyn, George Boleyn (c.1504-1536), Viscount Rochford, and two daughters, Mary Boleyn and Queen Anne Boleyn, mother of Elizabeth I.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Baronetage of 1720," to Which [Erroneous] Statement Brydges Adds
    cs CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 092 524 374 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924092524374 : Complete JSaronetage. EDITED BY Gr. Xtl. C O- 1^ <»- lA Vi «_ VOLUME I. 1611—1625. EXETER WILLIAM POLLAKD & Co. Ltd., 39 & 40, NORTH STREET. 1900. Vo v2) / .|vt POirARD I S COMPANY^ CONTENTS. FACES. Preface ... ... ... v-xii List of Printed Baronetages, previous to 1900 xiii-xv Abbreviations used in this work ... xvi Account of the grantees and succeeding HOLDERS of THE BARONETCIES OF ENGLAND, CREATED (1611-25) BY JaMES I ... 1-222 Account of the grantees and succeeding holders of the baronetcies of ireland, created (1619-25) by James I ... 223-259 Corrigenda et Addenda ... ... 261-262 Alphabetical Index, shewing the surname and description of each grantee, as above (1611-25), and the surname of each of his successors (being Commoners) in the dignity ... ... 263-271 Prospectus of the work ... ... 272 PREFACE. This work is intended to set forth the entire Baronetage, giving a short account of all holders of the dignity, as also of their wives, with (as far as can be ascertained) the name and description of the parents of both parties. It is arranged on the same principle as The Complete Peerage (eight vols., 8vo., 1884-98), by the same Editor, save that the more convenient form of an alphabetical arrangement has, in this case, had to be abandoned for a chronological one; the former being practically impossible in treating of a dignity in which every holder may (and very many actually do) bear a different name from the grantee.
    [Show full text]
  • Allington Heritage Statement
    Built Heritage Statement in Advance of the Proposed Development of Land South West of London Road and West of Castor Park, Allington, Kent. August 2018 Built Heritage Statement in Advance of the Proposed Development of Land South West of London Road and West of Castor Park, Allington, Kent. National Grid Reference TQ 73570 57309 Report for Clarendon Homes Date of Report: 22nd August 2018 SWAT ARCHAEOLOGY Swale and Thames Archaeological Survey Company School Farm Oast, Graveney Road Faversham, Kent ME13 8UP Tel; 01795 532548 or 07885 700 112 www.swatarchaeology.co.uk Development of Land South West of London Road and West of Castor Park, Allington, Kent. Built Heritage Statement Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Project Background ......................................................................................... 7 1.2 The Site ............................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Project Constraints .......................................................................................... 8 1.4 Scope of Document ......................................................................................... 8 2 PLANNING BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Heritage Assets
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster
    Availaible online at www.parliament.uk/jcpow © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords and House of Commons 2016 OF WESTMINSTER: SESSION 2016–17: FROM THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON PALACE FIRST REPORT This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster First Report of Session 2016–17 HL Paper 41 HC 659 HL Paper 41 HC 659 House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster First Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed on 5 September 2016 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 5 September 2016 HL Paper 41 HC 659 Published on 8 September 2016 by authority of the House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster The Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster was appointed in July 2015 to consider the restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster. The House of Commons Members were appointed on 16 July 2015. The House of Lords Members were appointed on 20 July 2015 and reappointed on 25 May 2016. Membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative) Chris Grayling MP (Conservative) (Co-Chairman) (Co-Chairman) Lord Carter of Coles (Labour) Chris Bryant MP (Labour) Lord Deighton (Conservative)
    [Show full text]