3. Character Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3. Character Areas CCommunityommunity AAgendagenda - 33.. CCharacterharacter AAreasreas Character Areas - Neighborhood Center D R L L E W S O R N O R T H P S D I ID R E E PW E D D E M R R T O N H N E C T D A E R R P D A W N R B D N I D ERGH DRL E D I S H T R D O R N N T O T S L O D B L T E O S N V E A E T W R N P T O V N H M A D O C L E S A I L I P K E H P C 14TH ST A P T J M S S E E E H W M A M J A E N LD E HO T H LE DO L A S T L N A OW S M E R DE ON AV N EL KHEAD AVE S CE LE N E PO N I L P B A G KWY S NORTH AV L P I T T N O N O N U R J E T S H O L M E M S A RT ING J D K R R IN R DR L E U T H T S S R MEMORIAL DR SE E T P E RA LP H DA VID ABERNATHY BL T S U E N V E IV A L E TY T R SI S N W M O S M GA Y W MC V D K O A P N O L U N L G A E H T T I W B L SA L O JO P N O E S R B T O CA E MPBELL R T M O ON R R D D S E 4 Map produced through the City of Atlanta, Department of Planning and Community Development, Office of Planning GIS, Shawn G. Brown City of Atlanta 0 1 2 Miles Character Areas Neighborhood Center Map 3-8: Neighborhood Center 472 CCommunityommunity AAgendagenda - 33.. CCharacterharacter AAreasreas GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Neighborhood centers are focal point of a neighborhood or group of neigh- borhoods. They have a concentra on of ac vi es including neighborhood ori- entated commercial business almost always including retail, personal services and restaurants and don’t have big box retail. Many of these shops are locally owned. Other uses o en include medium density housing, o ces, schools and other ins tu ons. The centers o en are not more than a few square blocks near the intersec on of well traveled local streets with a rela vely low travel speed. Also, they typically have historic or tradi onal building stock at a pedestrian scale of not more than three to four stories in height. The neigh- borhood centers are characteris cally highly walkable with abundant side- walks, street trees, street furniture, on-street parking, and nearby accessible public or green spaces such as plaza and parks. Over me, Neighborhood Centers have developed their own individual character and iden ty. Neigh- borhood fes vals and markets are o en held in Neighborhood Centers. LOCATIONS There are many neighborhood centers around the City. Moving clockwise star ng in Midtown, these include areas at the intersec on of 10th St. and Piedmont Ave., Monroe Dr. and 10th St., Morningside, Virginia-Highland, At- kins Park, Li le Five Points neighborhood, Inman Park Village, Kirkwood, East Atlanta Village, Georgia Avenue, Lakewood and Jonesboro Road, Dill Avenue, Cascade Heights, Westview, Capitol View and the Historic Westside Village (see Map 3-8). PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN Transporta on The neighborhood centers o en are located at or near the intersec on of well traveled de ned local or collector streets. These streets are usually only two or three lanes wide with two-way ow and a rela vely low travel speed, on street parking and typically removed from major highways. With the ex- cep on of the Historic Westside village, these areas are not directly served by MARTA rail and instead are only served via local bus lines. Almost all of the neighborhood centers are sized that they can be traversed en rely within a pleasant walking distance in comfort with abundant sidewalks and shade trees. Nevertheless, many of these exis ng sidewalks are in need of at least minor repair. Neighborhood Centers should have streetscapes with wide sidewalks, street trees and street furniture. Good pedestrian connec vity be- tween the neighborhood centers and surrounding residen al areas is impor- tant to improve their walkability and patronage by nearby residents. Parking should be shared to the extent possible and should be located predominately to the side and rear of buildings. Land Use Neighborhood centers are a hub of ac vity and give a neighborhood a de n- ing character. There is a concentra on of uses including neighborhood orien- tated commercial business almost always including retail, personal services and restaurants. Other uses o en include medium density housing, o ces, 473 CCommunityommunity AAgendagenda - 33.. CCharacterharacter AAreasreas schools and other ins tu onal uses. The loca ons of the school and ins tu- onal uses o en are home for community gathering spots. Also, the neigh- borhood centers typically have historic or tradi onal building stock at a pedes- trian scale of not more than three to four stories in height, however, usually surrounded by well established low density residen al neighborhoods. Al- though the neighbor centers do not typically have large green spaces, there are o en urbanized public gathering places such as plazas within them and are nearby other accessible larger public parks. Economic Development Although the City’s neighborhood centers o er a concentra on of neighbor- hood orientated uses and services, they s ll have a large number of either underu lized or vacant sites which o er the opportunity for in ll redevel- opment. Also, the charm of these neighborhood centers is at least in part due to the historic or tradi onal building stock. Therefore, it would be im- pera ve that the exis ng character and building be maintained as much as possible through renova on ec orts and adap ve re-use. Furthermore, public safety should be paramount u lizing a variety of means and technologies. The majority of these iden ed centers are zoned within the City of Atlanta’s Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District such that redevelopment and new in ll construc on would occur in a similar scale and higher design standard as any other readily iden able historic neighborhood center and be rea- sonably protected from higher density and commercial externali es such as increased parking demands. Also, in some cases, certain neighborhood centers have had an overabundance of par cular uses such as restaurants or personal services or have been burdened by prohibi ve alcohol licensing requirements which does not allow for full diversity of neighborhood-orien- tated commercial uses as well as quality businesses to serve the surrounding residen al neighborhoods. Locally owned businesses should be encouraged in Neighborhood Centers. Primary Land Uses Commercial O ce Residen al Ins tu onal Educa onal POLICIES Neighborhood Centers have policies intended to maintain and enhance their vitality including: Maintain and improve upon public safety. Preserve and restore exis ng, tradi onal and pedestrian scale and character of buildings in established neighborhoods. Promote a balance of retail, service, o ce, dining and residen al uses serving the adjacent neighborhoods. 474 CCommunityommunity AAgendagenda - 33.. CCharacterharacter AAreasreas Place controls on the development of larger scale strip development which are intended to serve larger areas than a single neighborhood or a small group of neighborhoods. Encourage integrated modes of transporta on including pedestrian, bicycle, auto and the use of public trans- porta on including MARTA by promo ng “complete streets”. Require new in ll development to be compa ble with the scale, height and character of adjoining neighbor- hoods and discourage auto-orientated uses. Provide a rac ve pedestrian oriented storefronts and ac vi es adjacent to sidewalks such as outdoor cafes/ markets. Facilitate safe, a rac ve and convenient pedestrian circula on with wide tree lined sidewalks that is part of an integrated transporta on network. Encourage the rehabilita on or development of neighborhood commercial areas to include propor onately signi cant residen al uses. Protect exis ng commercial areas from uses and building forms which are incompa ble with the scale, char- acter and needs of the adjacent neighborhoods. Minimize the use of adjacent neighborhood streets for commercial area parking by establishing adequate parking requirements and encouraging shared parking arrangements. Encourage the adap ve re-use of exis ng building stock. Encourage public/ins tu onal uses such as community centers and libraries that encourage community gath- ering. Encourage mixed-use ver cal buildings providing residen al uses above retail uses. Prevent the expansion of non-residen al uses into residen al areas. Provide diverse and more ac ordable housing opportuni es accessible for all ages. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES All neighborhood centers are in con nuous ec orts to maintain and enhance for their respec ve neighborhood centers. These speci c ac vi es include: Improve public safety with a variety of means and technologies. Improve vehicular and pedestrian connec vity and ADA access. Employ addi onal on-street parking and tra c calming measures. Promote locally owned businesses. Encourage more small scaled grocery stores and or fresh food op ons. Provide for a wider variety of commercial uses that meets the needs of the neighborhoods.
Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Development Plan
    2.0 Development Plan 2.1 Community Vision 2.2 LCI Study Area Concept Plan 2.3 Short-Term Priorities 2.4 Mid-Term Priorities 2.5 Long-Term Priorities 2.6 Corridor Development Program JSA McGill LCI Plan Prepared by: Urban Collage, Inc. in association with Cooper Carry, URS Corp., HPE, ZVA, ZHA, Verge Studios, Biscuit Studios & PEQ JSA- McGill LCI Study Community Vision 2.1 Community Vision A significant portion of the work done on the JSA-McGill LCI study involved public participation, and this took many different forms. As part of the Imagine Downtown process, JSA was publicized as one of five focus areas requiring planning attention. Dates and times of all public events were posted on the Central Atlanta Progress website (www.atlantadowntown.com). E-mail comments were welcomed and encouraged. Several questions in the online ‘Imagine Survey’ were directed toward development in the JSA-McGill corridor. The centerpieces of the public involvement process were three public workshops; the second being a three-day long ‘Charette Week’ designed to build awareness and excitement through an intense set of collaborative exercises. 2.1.1 Public Workshop 1 The first public workshop was held on August 19, 2003 on the 27th floor of SunTrust Tower; over 200 persons attended. The purpose was to kick off the JSA-McGill LCI process by introducing the project and the team, and to conduct interactive exercises to gauge the initial level of consensus on issues and priorities. The workshop opened with a welcome and introduction by representatives of Central Atlanta Progress, and continued with words and graphics describing the developing programs and potential impact of both the Georgia Aquarium and the World of Coca-Cola.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLANTA Overview
    PPR Fundamentals ATLANTA Overview Map Lumpkin Stephens Gordon Chattooga Pickens Daw son Franklin Banks \]^75 Hall \]^575 Floyd Bartow Cherokee 985 Forsyth \]^ \]^85 Jackson Madison kee Polk Barrow Gwinnett Cobb Clarke Paulding 75 \]^ Ogle 85 \]^ Oconee Haralson Fulton ? Dekalb Walton ATLANTA 20 Douglas 285 \]^20 eburne \]^ \]^ Rockdale \]^675 Carroll Morgan Greene Newton Clayton \]^20 \]^85 Henry Map Layers Fayette County PPR Markets 75 Cow eta \]^ U.S. Cities Jasper ? StatePutnam Capital Randolph Heard Butts Spalding Major Cities Secondary Cities 081624 Miles ©2001 Property & Portfolio Research Pike Summary of Last Twelve Months vs. Historical Minimum, Maximum, and Average Current Vacancy* Net New Supply (000SF)** Net Absorption (000SF)** Apartment ñ 12.8% ñ 17,902 ò 1,679 3.9% 12.8% -883 17,902 -55 16,322 94:3 02:3 93:2 02:3 02:1 84:4 Office ñ 20.4% ò 7,000 ò -1,417 9.3% 20.6% 908 11,564 -3,614 9,672 96:2 91:2 93:3 86:3 02:1 87:3 Retail ñ 16.6% ñ 6,700 ñ 752 8.8% 21.5% 1,240 7,270 -781 10,030 87:1 82:1 82:2 02:1 82:1 00:1 Warehouse ñ 13.7% ò 8,880 ò 1,589 1.7% 13.7% 348 17,700 812 12,851 84:2 02:3 93:2 01:2 91:4 01:1 Hotel ò 57.8% ñ 1,368 ò -3,241 71.5% 57.8% -101 5,648 -4,807 4,367 96:1 02:3 94:1 84:1 02:2 93:2 *Occupancy for Hotels **Apartment and Hotel data are in units.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Atlanta Living
    DOWNTOWN ATLANTA LIVING WWW.ATLANTADOWNTOWN.COM http://www.fontsite.com/Pages/FFDownloads.html DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS AND SURROUNDING AREAS Howell Mill Rd 10th St 10th St 10th St MIDTOWN VIRGINIA-HIGHLAND W Marietta St Howell Mill Rd Northside Dr 8th St Monroe Dr Peachtree St Joseph E Lowery Blvd GEORGIA TECH 75 Marietta St 85 Ponce De Leon Ave W Peachtree St W Peachtree Piedmont Ave Donald Lee Hollowell Pkwy Freedom Pkwy Northside Dr Ponce De Leon Ave North Ave North Ave North Ave MARIETTA ARTERY North Ave Spring St SONO OLD FOURTH WARD ENGLISH AVENUE NORTHSIDE DRIVE Marietta St CORRIDOR Boulevard Glen Iris Dr Centennial Olympic Park Drive Park Olympic Centennial James P Brawley Dr James P Brawley CENTENNIAL PLACE Peachtree St CENTENNIAL HILL Ralph McGill Blvd Ralph McGill Ave Freedom Parkway Spring St CENTENNIAL Baker - Highland Connector VINE CITY Marietta St HOTEL Highland Ave OLYMPIC PARK DISTRICT Freedom Parkway Northside Dr Andrew Young International Blvd Joseph E Lowery Blvd Andrew Young International Blvd Piedmont Ave FAIRLIE- Boulevard INMAN PARK Vine City POPLAR MARTA Station Auburn Ave Auburn Ave Edgewood Ave M L King Jr Dr GEORGIA Edgewood Ave STATE Spring St DeKalb Ave ATLANTA 75 UNIVERSITY 85 Wylie St CENTER Piedmont Ave KING HISTORIC James P Brawley Dr James P Brawley Decatur St DISTRICT CASTLEBERRY CABBAGETOWN HILL Jesse Hill Jr Dr Boulevard M L King Jr Dr Kirkwood Ave Peachtree St SOUTH CBD M L King Jr Dr Northside Dr Memorial Dr Memorial Dr MEMORIAL DRIVE CORRIDOR Boulevard 20 20 Capitol Ave Capitol GRANT PARK WEST END SUMMERHILL Joseph E Lowery Blvd MECHANICSVILLE Ralph David Abernathy Blvd Georgia Ave 75 West End West Metropolitan Pkwy Metropolitan DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS MARTA Station MARTA 85 SURROUNDING AREAS DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL MARKET FACTS & FIGURES EXISTING HOUSING Rental Units Market Rate.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peachtree 1.Indd
    Central Atlanta Progress Atlanta Downtown Improvement District City of Atlanta PeachtreePeachtree FocusFocus AreaArea SUMMARYSUMMARY REPORTREPORT OctoberOctober 20042004 Prepared by: Peachtree Corridor Urban Collage, Inc. Prepared by: Urban Cooper Collage, Carry,Inc. in association URS Corp., with ZVA, ZHA, HPE, Verge Studios, Biscuit Studios and PEQ Cooper Carry, URS Corp., ZVA, ZHA, HPE, Verge Studios, Biscuit Studios and PEQ OVERVIEW / ISSUES Overview The Peachtree Corridor forms the physical and symbolic backbone of Downtown Atlanta. In January through March of 2004, the Corridor was studied as one of fi ve targeted Focus Areas included in the “Imagine Downtown” planning and visioning process. A Peachtree Corridor Core Team stakeholder group of institutions, businesses, property owners and residents in the area was convened to review existing conditions, defi ne issues for discussion, review plan products and prioritize implementation steps. In addition, one-on-one interviews were held with many of the stakeholders in the corridor and over 150 people participated in the Community Workshop held on February 17, 2004. Focus Area Context The Peachtree Corridor Focus Area stretches from Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive on the south to North Avenue on the north. This linear corridor includes all properties within three blocks east and west of Peachtree Street itself and includes major landmarks such as the Five Points MARTA Station, Underground Atlanta, Fairlie-Poplar, Woodruff Park, Andrew Young International Boulevard, Peachtree Center, Mayor’s Park, Crawford-Long Hospital and several major Downtown churches, offi ce buildings and hotels. The Peachtree Corridor is unique in that it also overlaps three other Imagine Focus Areas: JSA-McGill, Eastside-Auburn, and South CBD.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastside Atlanta
    Redevelopment Models for Metro Atlanta 150,000 new residents expected by 2030 Source: Census Bureau 2005 Relevant Law Georgia Redevelopment Act Georgia Redevelopment Powers Act Downtown Development Authorities Law Enterprise Zone Employment Law Urban Redevelopment Act O.C.G.A. 36-61-1 • Adopted in 1955 • Governs the use of eminent domain and bond financing to support public/private partnerships • Allows cities and counties to redevelop specific areas Urban Redevelopment Act Prerequisites to Redevelopment under the Act • Area must be designated as a “slum area” • Redevelopment must be “necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare” of the citizens as declared by the city or county government • Adoption of a Redevelopment Plan by the local government Urban Redevelopment Act “Slum Area” is defined in the statute as: “…a substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures; predominance of defective or inadequate street layout…unsanitary or unsafe conditions…tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land…development impaired by noise or other environmental hazards; or any combination of such factors…[that] retards the provisions of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals or welfare in its present condition and use.” Urban Redevelopment Act Judicial Review • Local governments can define “slum” and “blight” themselves • No evidence or proof needed • Only require that a resolution was adopted Urban
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Atlanta Living
    DOWNTOWN ATLANTA LIVING WWW.ATLANTADOWNTOWN.COM http://www.fontsite.com/Pages/FFDownloads.html DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS AND SURROUNDING AREAS Howell Mill Rd 10th St 10th St 10th St MIDTOWN VIRGINIA-HIGHLAND W Marietta St Howell Mill Rd Northside Dr 8th St Monroe Dr Peachtree St Joseph E Lowery Blvd GEORGIA TECH 75 Marietta St 85 Ponce De Leon Ave W Peachtree St W Peachtree Piedmont Ave Donald Lee Hollowell Pkwy Freedom Pkwy Northside Dr Ponce De Leon Ave North Ave North Ave North Ave MARIETTA ARTERY North Ave Spring St SONO OLD FOURTH WARD ENGLISH AVENUE NORTHSIDE DRIVE Marietta St CORRIDOR Boulevard Glen Iris Dr Centennial Olympic Park Drive Park Olympic Centennial James P Brawley Dr James P Brawley CENTENNIAL PLACE Peachtree St CENTENNIAL HILL Ralph McGill Blvd Ralph McGill Ave Freedom Parkway Spring St CENTENNIAL Baker - Highland Connector VINE CITY Marietta St HOTEL Highland Ave OLYMPIC PARK DISTRICT Freedom Parkway Northside Dr Andrew Young International Blvd Joseph E Lowery Blvd Andrew Young International Blvd Piedmont Ave FAIRLIE- Boulevard INMAN PARK Vine City POPLAR MARTA Station Auburn Ave Auburn Ave Edgewood Ave M L King Jr Dr GEORGIA Edgewood Ave STATE Spring St DeKalb Ave ATLANTA 75 UNIVERSITY 85 Wylie St CENTER Piedmont Ave KING HISTORIC James P Brawley Dr James P Brawley Decatur St DISTRICT CASTLEBERRY CABBAGETOWN HILL Jesse Hill Jr Dr Boulevard M L King Jr Dr Kirkwood Ave Peachtree St SOUTH CBD M L King Jr Dr Northside Dr Memorial Dr Memorial Dr MEMORIAL DRIVE CORRIDOR Boulevard 20 20 Capitol Ave Capitol GRANT PARK WEST END SUMMERHILL Joseph E Lowery Blvd MECHANICSVILLE Ralph David Abernathy Blvd Georgia Ave 75 West End West Metropolitan Pkwy Metropolitan DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS MARTA Station MARTA 85 SURROUNDING AREAS DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL MARKET FACTS & FIGURES EXISTING HOUSING Rental Units Market Rate.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Redevelopment Powers Law: a Policy Guide to the Evaluation and Use of Tax Allocation Districts
    Georgia State University Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Georgia’s Redevelopment Powers Law: A Policy Guide to the Evaluation and Use of Tax Allocation Districts Authors Carolyn Bourdeaux & John Matthews Major Corporate Sponsors of Research Atlanta, Inc. Georgia State University Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Georgia’s Redevelopment Powers Law: A Policy Guide to the Evaluation and Use of Tax Allocation Districts Authors Carolyn Bourdeaux & John Matthews i Acknowledgements The authors thank the following individuals for their assistance in the preparation and review of this report: Dick Layton, Greg Giornelli, Myles Smith, and David Sjoquist. ii About the Authors Carolyn Bourdeaux is an Assistant Professor who works in the areas of public finance and governance at the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University. Her recent research has focused on the implications of using public authorities to develop and manage infrastructure intensive services. John Matthews is a Research Associate in the Fiscal Research Center at the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies and a Ph.D. student in the Georgia State/Georgia Institute of Technology Joint Public Policy Program. John's main research interest is in urban growth policy. iii Georgia’s Redevelopment Powers Law: A Policy Guide to the Evaluation and Use of Tax Allocation Districts Executive Summary Introduction Within the past five years, eleven separate tax allocation districts (TADs) have been created in the metropolitan Atlanta region. Currently, policy-makers in the City of Atlanta are considering the use of TADs to finance the proposed “Beltline” project. While TADs are a powerful tool in a localities’ economic development arsenal, these policies are not without cost and not without risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Atlanta Parking Assessment Existing Conditions
    Downtown Atlanta Parking Assessment Existing Conditions FINAL REPORT June 2014 FINAL REPORT Introduction Downtown Atlanta is thriving as one of the premier urban centers in the Southeastern United States. On a daily basis, the streets bustle with people from all walks of life. Students walk to campus to attend class at Georgia State University. Doctors and nurses head to Grady Memorial Hospital or Emory University Hospital Midtown to treat patients. Businessmen and women walk to work at one of the many high-rise office buildings that dominate the Atlanta sky-line. Government employees head to the Georgia State Capitol or Atlanta City Hall. Atlanta Falcons fans catch a football game at the Georgia Dome. Residents walk home to their urban neighborhood in the Fairlie- Poplar District. Out of town visitors experience something new and exciting, engaging wildlife at the Georgia Aquarium or engaging their senses at the World of Coca-Cola. New destinations awaken in the Downtown fabric on a daily basis, with the National Center for Civil and Human Rights and the College Football Hall of Fame opening in the very near future. The diversity in all that Downtown Atlanta has to offer draws an equally diverse set of people into the city’s central hub for activity. To accommodate ebb and flow, the City provides a number of transportation opportunities to serve its visitors, residents, and commuters. In addition to the extensive public transportation services that connect Downtown to the surrounding region, there are a multitude of options for drivers to access their destination via personal vehicle. Nearly 93,000 parking spaces serve Downtown motorists as they reach their final destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Presentation – June 26, 2018
    Downtown Chamblee Town Center MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION – JUNE 26, 2018 MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION June 26, 2018 Downtown Chamblee Town Center MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION – JUNE 26, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. CONSULTANT / STUDY PROCESS 4 - 13 III. PUBLIC PROCESS 14 - 16 IV. MUNICIPAL PROJECTS 17 - 19 V. DESIGN 20 - 31 VI. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS 32 VII. PRIORITY PROJECTS AND INITIATIVES 33 - 40 VIII. CITY’S ROLE IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 41 IX. LEGAL STRUCTURE 42 - 43 X. FINANCIAL TOOLS AND INCENTIVES 44 XI. CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS 45 XII. APPENDIX / EXHIBITS 46 XIII. REPRESENTATIVE DESIGN GUIDELINE IMAGES FOR DCTC DISTRICT 47- 51 2 Downtown Chamblee Town Center MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION – JUNE 26, 2018 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Brevity is the soul of wit” - William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act II Chamblee is a special place. From our initial engagement in December, 2017, we at Seven Oaks Company (“Seven Oaks”) reminded the members of the DDA and City Council that Chamblee is unique within metro-Atlanta in that it has done so many things well. Our overriding purpose through this entire engagement has been not to replace or redirect what Chamblee has accomplished, but take those building blocks already in place and guide the placement of the mortar around them to help form a strong lasting foundation for a strategic, aspirational vision for the Downtown Chamblee Town Center (“DCTC”), one which is real palpable, and most of all, capable of implementation. Numerous third-party studies were conducted, some directed by the City / DDA (Clark Patterson and Stantec Studies), as well as Seven Oaks on behalf of the City (ParkSimple, Noell Consulting and CBRE/PKF).
    [Show full text]
  • Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5
    Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5 - Eastside Extending Atlanta’s Urban Redevelopment Potential Prepared for The City of Atlanta Fulton County and The Atlanta Board of Education by Eastside Atlanta Stakeholders and Huntley & Associates November 2003 Extending Atlanta’s Urban Redevelopment Potential Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5 Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 12 The Vision 12 Description of the Proposed TAD / Geographic Boundaries (A) 13 Overview of Tax Allocation Districts 13 Tax Increment Financing Spurs Redevelopment 14 Summary of Atlanta TADs 15 Why Eastside Atlanta Qualifies for TAD 18 Key Findings within the Redevelopment Area 20 Rationale for the Proposed Eastside Redevelopment Area and TAD 20 2000 Census Tracts within the Proposed Eastside TAD 20 Market Conditions and Trends (B) 21 Proposed Land Uses and Redevelopment Projects (C) 28 The Vision 28 Strategy and Goals 28 Proposed Private Redevelopment Projects (D) 29 Public Improvements and Additional Economic Catalysts 37 Contractual Relationships (E) 43 Relocation Plans (F) 44 Zoning & Land Use Compatibility (G) 45 Method of Financing / Proposed Public Investments (H) 45 Taxable Valuation for TAD (I) 47 Historic Property within Boundaries of TAD (J) 47 Creation & Termination Dates for TAD (K) 48 Tax Allocation Increment Base & State Certification (M) 48 NOTE: Section and subsection headings listed below that are followed by a (n) denote information specifically required per Georgia Code Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Georgia “Let’S Go Downtown”
    ATLANTA GEORGIA “LET’S GO DOWNTOWN” BY: STEPHEN BINGHAM BARBARA BOGNER SUZANNE C. FREUND Atlanta - Page 1 of 22 1. Introduction In order to assist the Downtown Denver Partnership conduct a peer cities analysis, an assessment of Atlanta, Georgia was conducted. The assessment began by identifying the area of Atlanta that is considered to be the official ‘downtown.’ Research was done of both qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative geographic and demographic material required minimal analysis to primarily ensuring that data was complete, current, and applicable to the study area. Qualitative data required a more inferential approach. This analysis compelled an advanced understanding of available information in order to establish a knowledge of the current ‘feel’ of the urban center. Once the data was analyzed, a profile for the downtown was established. This profile focused on the current conditions, opportunities and constraints, past successes and failures, as well as current plans and policies of downtown Atlanta and related agencies. After analyzing data and developing a profile for Atlanta, a similar study needed to be conducted for Denver. Utilizing information provided by the Downtown Denver Partnership or found through individual research, a profile for Denver was established that could be used to conduct a comparative analysis between the two cities’ urban centers. The comparative analysis began by identifying similarities and differences between Atlanta and Denver. After a detailed comparison had been completed, several issues of interest were identified. The first type of issues were policies or trends existing in Atlanta that Denver could learn from and perhaps implement in an effort to mitigate current or potential future problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Review Finding
    REGIONAL REVIEW FINDING DATE: Nov 27 2006 ARC REVIEW CODE: R611091 TO: Mayor Shirley Franklin ATTN TO: Shelley Peart, Bureau of Planning NOTE: This is digital FROM: Charles Krautler, Director signature. Original on file. The Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) has completed regional review of the following Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Below is the ARC finding. The Atlanta Regional Commission reviewed the DRI with regard to conflicts to regional plans, goals, and policies and impacts it might have on the activities, plans, goals, and policies of other local jurisdictions and state, federal, and other agencies. The finding does not address whether the DRI is or is not in the best interest of the local government. Submitting Local Government: City of Atlanta Name of Proposal: Post Allen Plaza Review Type: Development of Regional Impact Date Opened: Nov 9 2006 Date Closed: Nov 27 2006 FINDING: After reviewing the information submitted for the review, and the comments received from affected agencies, the Atlanta Regional Commission finding is that the DRI is in the best interest of the Region, and therefore, of the State. Additional Comments: The proposed development meets several of ARC’s Regional Development Policies. This is an infill development that is replacing housing and retail uses to the area. The proposed development meets the Regional Development Policies 1 through 6 by accommodating new growth efficiently where there are existing roads, sewers, and other infrastructure. The proposed development meets Regional Development Policy 2 as the site is located within the central business district. As an infill, mixed-use, and transit oriented redevelopment, the proposed development meets Regional Development Policy 3.
    [Show full text]