<<

Hamadryad Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 9 – 21, 2009. Copyright 2009 Centre for Herpetology, Madras Crocodile Bank Trust.

Reptile diversity of province, western : an update

Olivier S. G. Pauwels1, Tanya Chan-ard2, Pratyaporn Wanchai3, Boonrod Kheowyoo4 and Aaron M. Bauer5

1 Département des Vertébrés Récents, Institut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Rue Vautier 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Email: [email protected] 2 National Science Museum, Technopolis, Klong 5, Klong Luang, Patumthani 12120, Thailand 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University, 10330, Thailand. Email: [email protected] 4 Banlatwitthaya School, Ban Lat, 76150 Phetchaburi, Thailand 5 Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] (with 11 text-figures) ABSTRACT.– New material from , , is presented, including eight new provincial records, among which the Thai endemics Gehyra lacerata and Isopachys gyldenstolpei, and the second Thai record of the rare Oreophis porphyraceus laticinctus. A total number of 102 reptile species is currently known from the province, i.e., nearly a third of the total species number recorded so far from Thailand. Several of the new records were made in Kaeng Krachan National Park, which is now known to house at least 67 species. An updated provincial reptile list is provided.

KEY WORDS.– Reptilia, Draco, Gehyra, Eutropis, Isopachys, Oreophis, Calliophis, Phetchaburi Province, Kaeng Krachan National Park, Thailand, biodiversity.

Introduction presented new records for the Ban Lat : Of the 76 Thai provinces, tentative comprehen- Ahaetulla nasuta (Lacepède, 1789) (also a pro- sive reptile lists are currently available for only vincial record, see below), Lycodon capucinus three: Phang-Nga, Phetchaburi and Phuket, all Boie, 1827, Oligodon fasciolatus (Günther, situated in peninsular Thailand, an area of spe- 1864) and Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831. Mal- cial zoogeographical interest because it lies at hotra and Thorpe (2004), in genetic studies, the juncture of the limits of the Indo-Himalayan cited samples of Cryptelytrops albolabris (Gray, and Sundaic herpetofaunas. Each additional 1842) and Popeia popeiorum (Smith, 1937), two record from these provinces will thus contribute taxa already cited from the province (Pauwels et to a better understanding of the distribution pat- al., 2003; see Discussion), from “Phetburi prov- terns along the Thai-. ince”. Temsiripong (2007) claimed that Kaeng Since Pauwels et al.’s (2003) detailed discus- Krachan National Park is home to the largest sion on the zoogeography of Phetchaburi reptile wild Thai population of Crocodylus siamensis, fauna, a few additional mentions of Phetchaburi although without providing any detail or vouch- Province have been made available. For ers. Several locality records by Nabhitabhata et instance, Pauwels et al. (2004) added Orthrio- al. (2004) from the province were given without phis taeniurus ridleyi (Butler, 1899) to the pro- reference to preserved specimens, but are ac- vincial list, and Pauwels and Kheowyoo (2004) tually based on material deposited in the Thai 10 Hamadryad [Vol. 34, No. 1

National History Museum (Patumthani). For instance, the THNHM material from Kaeng Krachan National Park was sub- sequently summarized by Pauwels and Chan-ard (2006). Additional records for the park and for other parts of the prov- ince are detailed in the present contribu- tion.

Materials and methods Besides the Thai National History Mu- seum, the other unpublished material presented here was deposited in the Chu- lalongkorn University Museum of Zo- ology (Bangkok), at the Banlatwitthaya School (Ban Lat) and at the Royal Bel- gian Institute for Natural Sciences (Brus- sels). Body measurements were made to the nearest millimeter. Paired meristic characters are given in the left/right or- der. Snake ventral scales were counted according to Dowling’s (1951) method. The terminal tail scute is not included in the subcaudal count. The numbers of dor- sal scale rows are given respectively at one head length behind head, at midbody (above the ventral corresponding to half Figure 1. Map of Thailand showing location of Phetcha- of the total number of ventrals), and at buri Province. one head length before vent. Abbreviations: BWS: Banlatwitthaya School, Ban Lat; CUMZ: Chulalongkorn Uni- KKNP, Kaeng Krachan D. It was crawling along versity Museum of Zoology, Bangkok; D.: dis- a river. New locality record. This species has al- trict; DSR: dorsal scale rows; IRSNB: Royal ready been recorded from two other localities in Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences, Brussels; KKNP (Pauwels and Chan-ard, 2006), but is not KKNP: Kaeng Krachan National Park; SVL: known outside the Park in Phetchaburi Prov- snout-vent length; TaL: tail length; THNHM: ince. Thai National History Museum, Patumthani. Lacertilia Results Agamidae New material and observations are presented hereafter by alphabetical order of taxa within Calotes emma emma Gray, 1845: The species orders. All taxa recorded from Phetchaburi was recorded for the first time from Phetchaburi Province, the present work included, are listed Province, based on observations of specimens in Table 1. at Bang Krang, KKNP, Kaeng Krachan D., by Pauwels and Chan-ard (2006), but without Chelonii vouchers. One of us (BK) took photographs of Testudinidae the species at the same locality on 18 February 2006 (Fig. 3). Manouria emys phayrei (Blyth, 1853): Photo voucher. BK photographed a specimen by day Calotes mystaceus Duméril & Bibron, 1837: on 29 February 2005 (Fig. 2) at Ban Krang, Voucher photo (Fig. 4) taken by BK at Ban Lat August, 2009] Reptile diversity of Phetchaburi 11

Witthaya School, Ban Lat, Ban Lat D., on 14 served by OSGP in the sunny afternoon of 18 May 2006. A population is living on the school September 2003, on rocky outcrops in second- campus. New locality record. The species had ary forest on Khao Towmo, Kratluang Subdis- already been recorded from a nearby locality in trict, Tha Yang D. When approached, they dis- the same district, but no vouchers were taken. appeared into rock crevices and could not be So far, Calotes mystaceus is known from only caught. New province record. two localities in the province. Isopachys anguinoides (Boulenger, 1914): Draco maculatus (Gray, 1845): Photo voucher THNHM 1306–12: Forestry Training Center, (Fig. 5) taken by BK at Ban Krang, KKNP, Cha-am, Cha-am D. This series was caught in Kaeng Krachan D., on 15 May 2006. The spe- the litter and under sand in beach forest, in strict cies is clearly recognizable by its diagnostic syntopy with Riopa bowringii and combination of blue and yellow colours on the quadrupes (see below). It represents a new dis- dewlap (U. Manthey, pers. comm.). New prov- trict record and illustrates the great ecological ince record. plasticity of this endemic species, found in ever- green forest, cave entrances, as well as in open Gekkonidae areas on sandy soil (Pauwels et al., 2003; Pau- wels and Chan-ard, 2006). All these specimens Dixonius siamensis (Boulenger, 1898): THNHM have 24 scale rows around midbody. Contrary to 1299–1305: Forestry Training Center, Cha-am, what was observed by Lang and Böhme (1990), Cha-am D. These specimens, caught in beach the nasal scales are in contact in all specimens forest, were first noted by Nabhitabhata et al. of the present series. (2004: 63), who did not provide explicit informa- tion about the vouchers. Pauwels et al. (2003) did Isopachys gyldenstolpei Lönnberg, 1916: THN- not record the species from this district. HM 1466–67: Forestry Training Center, Cha- am, Cha-am D. Caught in the litter in beach Gehyra lacerata (Taylor, 1962): IRSNB 17021: forest. Both specimens have 24 scale rows Ban Phoo Toom, Ban Lat D., Sept. 2003 (caught around midbody and agree in all respects with at night on rocks in a cultivated area); THNHM the current definition of that species. With SVL 1329: Forestry Training Center, Cha-am, Cha- and tail lengths of 88 + 33 and 150 + 55 mm, am D. (collected from beach forest). New pro- respectively (tails complete), these specimens vincial record. This species seems endemic to are the smallest known, the SVL variation of Thailand, where it is known from the provinces previously studied specimens being 167–220 of , Kanchanaburi, Nakhon Ratchasi- mm (Lang and Böhme, 1990). New provincial ma, Phetchaburi and Sa Kaeo (Nabhitabhata et record. This rare endemic species was previ- al., 2004; present data). Recently, this species ously known only from the provinces of Kan- was cited from Vietnam (Nguyen et al., 2005), chanaburi and (Lang and but without voucher specimens, so the presence Böhme, 1990), respectively north and south of of this species in Vietnam remains unconfirmed. Phetchaburi Province. With Hua Hin and Nong Kae in Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Cha-am Hemidactylus platyurus (Schneider, 1792): No is the third locality where I. gyldenstolpei is voucher specimen. Six adult specimens were known to occur along with I. anguinoides. observed by OSGP on 23 September 2006 around 1900 h, hunting insects near lights at the Lygosoma quadrupes (Linnaeus, 1766): THN- headquarters of Cha-am Forest Park, Cha-am D. HM 1330–33: Forestry Training Center, Cha- New locality record. am, Cha-am D. Caught in the litter in beach for- est; locally abundant. New district record. Scincidae Riopa bowringii (Günther, 1864): THNHM Eutropis longicaudata (Hallowell, 1856): No 1288–93, THNHM 1297–98: Forestry Training voucher specimen. Two adults were clearly ob- Center, Cha-am, Cha-am D. These specimens, 12 Hamadryad [Vol. 34, No. 1

Table 1. Updated list of the reptiles of Phetchaburi Province, with occurrence per district (BLae = ; BLat = Ban Lat D.; CA = Cha-am D.; KK = Kaeng Krachan D.; KY = Khao Yoi D.; M = Muang D.; NYP = Nong Ya Plong D.; TY = Tha Yang D.). Data are based on Pauwels and Chan-ard (2006), Pauwels and Kheowyoo (2004), Pauwels et al. (2003, 2004) and the present work. Question marks indicate species for which no locality more precise than the province is available; however for these five marine taxa the most probable district by far is Muang D. Taxa are arranged alphabetically within orders and suborders. Taxon/District BLae Blat CA KK KY M NYP TY Chelonii Bataguridae Cuora amboinensis kamaroma X Cyclemys dentata X Heosemys grandis X X Malayemys macrocephala X X X X Siebenrockella crassicollis X Cheloniidae Chelonia mydas X Eretmochelys imbricata X Testudinidae Indotestudo elongata X Manouria emys phayrei X Trionychidae Amyda cartilaginea X Dogania subplana X Pelochelys cantorii X Crocodylia Crocodylidae Crocodylus siamensis X X Tomistoma schlegelii X Lacertilia Agamidae Acanthosaura crucigera X Bronchocela cristatella X Calotes emma emma X C. mystaceus X C. versicolor X X X Draco blanfordii blanfordii X Draco maculatus X D. taeniopterus X Gekkonidae Cnemaspis cf. kandiana X Cnemaspis siamensis X Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus X C. cf. oldhami X Dixonius siamensis X X X X Gehyra lacerata X X G. mutilata X X Gekko gecko X X X X August, 2009] Reptile diversity of Phetchaburi 13

Hemidactylus frenatus X X X H. platyurus X X X Ptychozoon lionotum X Lacertidae Takydromus sexlineatus ocellatus X Scincidae Eutropis longicaudata X E. macularia X E. multifasciata X X X Isopachys anguinoides X X X X I. gyldenstolpei X Lipinia vittigera X Lygosoma quadrupes X X X X Riopa bowringii X X X X X Scincella melanosticta X Sphenomorphus maculatus mitanensis X S. cf. tersus X Uromastycidae Leiolepis belliana belliana X X Varanidae Varanus nebulosus X X X V. rudicollis X V. salvator X X X Serpentes Acrochordidae Acrochordus granulatus ? Colubridae Ahaetulla nasuta X A. prasina X Boiga multomaculata X X B. siamensis X X Chrysopelea ornata ornatissima X X X X X Coelognathus radiatus X X X X Dendrelaphis cyanochloris X D. pictus X X X X Dryocalamus davisonii X X X Gonyosoma oxycephalum X Lycodon capucinus X X X L. fasciatus X L. subcinctus subcinctus X Oligodon fasciolatus X X X O. mouhoti X X X Oreophis porphyraceus laticinctus X Orthriophis taeniurus ridleyi X O. taeniurus ssp. X Ptyas korros X X X 14 Hamadryad [Vol. 34, No. 1

P. mucosa X X X Elapidae Bungarus fasciatus X Calliophis bivirgata flaviceps X Calliophis maculiceps X Enhydrina schistosa ? Hydrophis caerulescens ? H. ornatus ? Lapemis curtus hardwickii ? Naja kaouthia X X N. siamensis X X Ophiophagus hannah X Sinomicrurus macclellandi macclellandi X Homalopsidae Cerberus rynchops X Enhydris enhydris X X X E. plumbea X X Erpeton tentaculatum X Homalopsis buccata X X X Lamprophiidae Psammodynastes pulverulentus X Psammophis indochinensis X X Natricidae Rhabdophis nigrocinctus X R. subminiatus subminiatus X X Xenochrophis flavipunctatus X X X X X. trianguligerus X Pareatidae Pareas carinatus X P. margaritophorus X Pythonidae Python brongersmai X P. molurus bivittatus X X P. reticulatus reticulatus X X Typhlopidae Ramphotyphlops braminus X X Uropeltidae Cylindrophis ruffus X X X X Viperidae Calloselasma rhodostoma X X X Cryptelytrops albolabris X X Popeia fucata X Xenopeltidae Xenopeltis unicolor X X X X Total 3 45 20 75 1 23/28? 0 15 August, 2009] Reptile diversity of Phetchaburi 15 caught in the litter in beach forest, represent am D. Caught in beach forest. New subdistrict a new district record. All have 30 scale rows record. around midbody. Oreophis porphyraceus laticinctus (Schulz & Varanidae Helfenberger, 1998): Photo voucher. A juve- nile specimen (total length ca. 30 cm, see Fig. Varanus rudicollis Gray, 1845: Photo voucher 8) was observed by PW on 26 June 2006 in (Fig. 6). One of us (PW) observed and photo- KKNP, Phanoen Thung Station, Kaeng Krachan graphed on 19 May 2007 an adult individual D., precisely at UTM 47 N, x = 1417808 m, y which was basking in a clearing in primary for- = 0539698 m, altitude 967 m asl. It was found est in KKNP, Kaeng Krachan D., precisely at on the ground, basking in a clearing in primary UTM 47 N, x = 1417126 m, y = 0541187 m, rainforest. When disturbed, it quickly tried to altitude 807 m asl. Its total length was ca. 120 take refuge under the closest dead fallen tree; it cm. The specimen, although approached very did not attempt to bite when handled. Although closely (ca. 1 m) made no attempt to bite nor to the specimen was released, the examination of escape. New province record. the colour and meristic characters shown on the picture leaves no doubt as to its identifica- Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768): Photo vou- tion (compare with the descriptions provided cher (Fig. 7). One of us (BK) photographed an by Schulz, 1996; Schulz and Helfenberger, adult individual that was foraging in an irriga- 1998, and Grossmann and Tillack, 2004), es- tion canal in a cultivated area at Laem Phak Bia, pecially the characteristic length of its red dor- Ban Laem D. New locality record. sal bands. This subspecies, whose distribution is mainly Malaysian-Indonesian, was known Serpentes from a single specimen and a single locality in Colubridae Thailand, in Province (Niyomwan, 2004, 2006). The new locality partly fills a wide Ahaetulla nasuta (Lacepède, 1789): IRSNB geographical gap between Ratchaburi and the 16995: Ban Lat D., no date. SVL 269 mm; TaL closest Malaysian localities. Both known Thai 132 mm. The species was mentioned by Pau- localities are situated at much lower elevations wels and Kheowyoo (2004), but not supported (Niyomwan’s specimen was found at 762 m asl) by the reference to a voucher specimen, al- than had previously been reported for O. por- though it was indeed based on the present one. phyraceus laticinctus (Grossmann and Tillack, Its main meristic characters are: 15 DSR; 1 pre- 2004, gave an altitude range of 1,476–2,032 ventral + 188 ventrals; 152 subcaudals, divided; m asl). Thailand is thus home to three subspe- 8/8 supralabials with the 5th reaching the eye; cies of Oreophis porphyraceus: the nominate 9/9 infralabials whose the first four in contact subspecies in the extreme northwest (Chiang with the first pair of sublinguals on each side; Mai, , Mae Hong Son provinces), anal divided. O. p. coxi in the north-east (Chaiyaphum, Loei, Phetchabun), and O. p. laticinctus in the west Dendrelaphis pictus (Gmelin, 1789): BWS (Phetchaburi, Ratchaburi) and probably in the (adult, unnumbered): Wat Pa Pen, Ban Lat D., entire Tenasserim Range along the Thai-Malay Jan. 2007. New locality record. peninsula (Grossmann and Tillack, 2004; Na- bhitabhata et al., “2000” 2004; Prathumthong, Dryocalamus davisonii (Blanford, 1878): THN- 2001; Schulz, 1996; Schulz and Helfenberger, HM 1278–79: Forestry Training Center, Cha- 1998, this work). am, Cha-am D. Caught in beach forest. New district record. Ptyas mucosa (Linnaeus, 1758): BWS (adult, unnumbered): Moo 3, Huayluk Subdistrict, Oligodon mouhoti (Boulenger, 1914): THNHM Ban Lat D. (coll. S. Sooksagnat). New locality 1295: Forestry Training Center, Cha-am, Cha- record. CUMZ (R) 2002.298: Ban Lounsamo, 16 Hamadryad [Vol. 34, No. 1

Thaleng Subdistrict, Tha Yang D. New district juvenile, many more in the adult). New province record. record.

Elapidae Homalopsidae

Calliophis bivirgata flaviceps (Cantor, 1839): Cerberus rynchops (Schneider, 1799): CUMZ Photo voucher (Fig. 9). One of us (PW) ob- (R) 2002.297: Ban Laem, Ban Laem D. The served and photographed on 5 April 2007 an species was known from this locality based on adult individual in KKNP, Kaeng Krachan D., a photograph of a specimen (see Pauwels et al., precisely at UTM 47 N, x = 1418239 m, y = 2003), but not supported by a voucher speci- 0541180 m, altitude 879 m asl. Its total length men. The present individual was caught by day was ca. 100 cm. The snake was found by day on in the mangrove at low tide while it was active- the ground in a shaded area in bamboo forest. ly exploring crab holes in the mud. Four other As soon as it was approached, it quickly took specimens were seen by OSGP within 50 m, and refuge under the closest dead fallen tree. Pau- the species is locally abundant. wels et al. (2003: 39) discussed an unconfirmed record of this species in Phetchaburi Province; Homalopsis buccata (Linnaeus, 1758): BWS the present individual thus represents the first (juv., unnumbered): Ban Nongkathong, Ban Lat confirmed provincial record. D., 25 November 2004 (coll. S. Khonmee). New locality record. Calliophis maculiceps (Günther, 1858): IRSNB 16994: Ban Salakern, Ban Lat D., late Sept. Lamprophiidae 2003. Juvenile; 2+192 ventrals; divided anal; 18 subcaudals, divided; 13–13–13 DSR; SVL 126 Psammodynastes pulverulentus Boie in Boie, mm; TaL 9 mm. QSMI 799: Ban Salakern, Ban 1827: Photo voucher (Fig. 10). One of us (BK) Lat D., Oct. 2003. Male; 2 + ca. 185 ventrals observed on 15 May 2006 an adult individual (body damaged); divided anal; 24 subcaudals; crossing over the road by day on Khao Phanoen 13–13–13 DSR; SVL 269 mm; TaL 25 mm. Thung, KKNP, Kaeng Krachan D. The species IRSNB 16994 was found by day by a farmer had already been mentioned from three locali- who was searching for snails as fishing bait un- ties in KKNP by Pauwels et al. (2003), but no der litter in a banana plantation. QSMI 799 was voucher was documented. Within Phetchaburi found dead on a road crossing a banana plan- Province, the species has not yet been mentioned tation. Both voucher specimens show the same from outside the park. New locality record. colour pattern in preservative: head surface dark brown with beige patches on the snout, posterior Pythonidae supralabials and temporals; colour darkening on the nape where it forms a black nuchal collar, Python brongersmai Stull, 1938: Photo voucher the lower extremities of which being visible (Fig. 11). A subadult individual (total length ca. from underview. The dorsum is beige, with a 120 cm) was observed by PW on 3 Dec. 2006 in continuous black line on the vertebral scale row, KKNP, Kaeng Krachan D., at UTM 47 N, x = extending from the nuchal collar to one scale be- 1417761 m, y = 0540594 m, altitude 766 m asl. fore the tail tip, linking the two black complete The python was in a shaded area on the ground rings on tail (one just after the cloacum, the sec- in primary rainforest, ca. 5 m from a stream. It ond just before tail tip). Underside of head beige made no attempt to bite when handled. The spe- with dark brown markings on the infralabials, cies was already mentioned from the park by and the extremities of the nuchal ring visible on Pauwels and Chan-ard (2006), but no voucher the lateral sides. Venter uniformly beige. Un- material was presented. Fig. 11 definitively con- derside of tail withish with two black rings and firms the presence of this species in the Prov- black spots between those rings (2 spots in the ince. August, 2009] Reptile diversity of Phetchaburi 17

Xenopeltidae Kalyabina-Hauf et al. (2004), in the list of material examined for their molecular study of Xenopeltis unicolor Boie, 1827: No voucher the genus Acanthosaura, mentioned a specimen specimen. In the late afternoon of 11 Novem- of A. crucigera Boulenger, 1885 (“A89”) from ber 2004, one of us (OSGP) caught and released “Kaeng Krachan, Kao Yoi , Phetchaburi a subadult individual in a house garden near Province, : 13°99’N, 1002° Phetchaburi College, Phetchaburi city, Muang [sic] 25’E (tissue sample and photo from Peter D. It was found under wood debris. New district P. Van Dijk)”, and an A. lepidogaster (Cuvier, record. 1829) (“A147”) from “Khao-Yoi, Thailand: Additional unpublished material from 13°22’N, 99°81’40’’E”. The geographical coor- Phetchaburi Province includes an adult Rampho- dinates provided for A147 falls within Phetch- typhlops braminus (Daudin, 1803) (THNHM aburi Province in Khao Yoi D., but is located 1296) (Typhlopidae) and two Calloselasma rho- much more northern (apparently in Suphan Buri dostoma (Boie, 1827) (THNHM 1280–81) (Vi- Province) by the authors on the map they pro- peridae) caught in beach forest at the Forestry vided (loc. cit.:8). Acanthosaura lepidogaster, Training Center, Cha-am, Cha-am D., but these whose presence in the province was not unam- do not represent new locality records, since they biguously recorded (see Pauwels and Chan-ard, were already known and documented through 2006), is thus not yet confirmed. museum vouchers from Cha-am (Pauwels et The sympatry in the province of two forms al., 2003). We also report an unpublished speci- belonging to the Orthriophis taeniurus species men of Cryptelytrops albolabris (Gray, 1842) complex is surprising. Comparing the O. taen- (IRSNB 16993) (Viperidae) from Ban Lat D., iurus ssp. shown by Schulz (1996: 264) and the no date, but the species is already well known typical O. taeniurus ridleyi specimen reported from this district (Pauwels et al., 2003). by Pauwels et al. (2004) unambiguously shows that they are distinct taxa. In view of the sym- Discussion patry of ridleyi with other forms of the complex, Since Pauwels et al.’s (2003) herpetological work the subspecies status of the form ridleyi should on Phetchaburi Province, several taxonomic be re-evaluated. We believe it may deserve a changes have occurred, bringing modifications specific status. A record of “Elaphe taeniura” to the species list. For instance, on the basis of from Khao Yoi D. by Nabhitabhata et al. (2004) a large-scale study on carapace morphology and remains unresolved. head colour pattern, Brophy (2004) demonstrat- Nabhitabhata et al. (2004) mentioned Lio- ed that the populations of Malayemys subtrijuga peltis scriptus from Phetchaburi River, but no (Schlegel and Müller, 1844) from western Thai- voucher was presented; its actual presence in the land actually belong to M. macrocephala (Gray, province is zoogeographically probable, but still 1859). Malayemys subtrijuga thus needs to be unconfirmed. The survival of Pelochelys canto- deleted from Phetchaburi’s species list, and M. rii and Tomistoma schlegelii in KKNP requires macrocephala added to it. The Phetchaburi Prov- confirmation; the evaluation of the viability of ince records of “Trimeresurus popeiorum” are extant populations in the park is a priority con- in fact referrable to Popeia fucata (Vogel, Dav- servation action for these two severely endan- id and Pauwels, 2004) (see Vogel et al., 2004). gered species. Boiga ocellata Kroon, 1973 was shown to be a junior subjective synonym of Boiga siamensis Conclusion Nootpand, 1971 (Pauwels et al., 2005). Pauwels and Chan-ard (2006) added 12 species It is to be mentioned that the photographs ac- to Phetchaburi Province: Cnemaspis cf. kandi- companying Pauwels and Kheowyoo’s (2004) ana (Kelaart, 1852) (see Bauer et al., 2007 for new records were not included by the authors, comments about C. kandiana extralimital to Sri but added by the journal’s editor; they thus do Lanka), Ptychozoon lionotum Annandale, 1905 not represent the specimens listed, and at least (Gekkonidae), Calotes emma emma Gray, 1845, one (supposed to illustrate Leiolepis belliana) is Draco taeniopterus Günther, 1861 (Agamidae), misidentified. Eutropis macularia (Blyth, 1853), Scincella 18 Hamadryad [Vol. 34, No. 1

Figure 2. Manouria emys phayrei, Ban Krang, Kaeng Figure 3. Adult Calotes emma emma, Ban Krang, Kaeng Krachan National Park. Photo. by B. Kheowyoo. Krachan National Park. Photo. by B. Kheowyoo.

Figure 4. Adult Calotes mystaceus, Ban Lat Witthaya Figure 5. Adult Draco maculatus, Ban Krang, Kaeng School, . Photo. by B. Kheowyoo. Krachan National Park. Photo. by B. Kheowyoo.

Figure 6. Adult Varanus rudicollis, Kaeng Krachan Figure 7. Adult Varanus salvator from Laem Phak Bia, National Park. Photo. by P. Wanchai. Ban Laem District. Photo. by B. Kheowyoo. August, 2009] Reptile diversity of Phetchaburi 19

Figure 8. Juvenile Oreophis porphyraceus laticinctus, Phanoen Thung Station, Kaeng Krachan National Park. Photo. by P. Wanchai.

Figure 10. Adult Psammodynastes pulverulentus, Khao Phanoen Thung, Kaeng Krachan National Park. Pho- Figure 9. Adult Calliophis bivirgata flaviceps, Kaeng to. by B. Kheowyoo. Krachan National Park. Photo. by P. Wanchai.

sents nearly a third of the total number of reptile species recorded so far from the whole Kingdom of Thailand (Nabhitabhata et al., 2004; Pauwels and David, 2005). The addition of Draco macu- latus, the rare Oreophis porphyraceus laticinc- tus, Calliophis bivirgata flaviceps and Varanus Figure 11. Subadult Python brongersmai, Kaeng Kra- rudicollis, reinforces the importance of KKNP, chan National Park. Photo. by P. Wanchai. which now includes at least 67 species (see Pau- wels and Chan-ard, 2006), in the conservation of the Thai herpetofauna. Aside from its diver- melanosticta (Boulenger, 1887), Sphenomor- sity, KKNP is of special interest, due both to its phus cf. tersus (Smith, 1916) (Scincidae), Lyco- diversity in biotopes and elevations, and its zo- don fasciatus (Anderson, 1879), L. subcinctus ogeographical position, at the confluence of the subcinctus Boie, 1827, Xenochrophis trian- Sundaic and Indo-Himalayan faunas. guligerus (Boie, 1827) (Colubridae), Sinom- A number of predictions as to the presence icrurus macclellandi macclellandi (Reinhardt, of additional taxa in Phetchaburi Province were 1844) (Elapidae) and Python brongersmai Stull, made by Pauwels et al. (2003) based on global 1938 (Pythonidae). With these 12 records, the species distribution patterns. Among the ca. 55 eight additions made in the present report and predicted taxa (including sea snakes), the fol- the two others cited in the Introduction (Ahaetul- lowing 12 have already been found to date: la nasuta and Orthriophis taeniurus ridleyi), the Calotes emma emma, Draco maculatus and D. number of reptile species currently recorded for taeniopterus, Ptychozoon lionotum, Eutropis Phetchaburi Province reaches 102. This repre- longicaudata, Isopachys gyldenstolpei, Ahaet- 20 Hamadryad [Vol. 34, No. 1 ulla nasuta, Lycodon subcinctus subcinctus, manuscript. Frank Tillack (Berlin) kindly pro- Oreophis porphyraceus laticinctus, Calliophis vided useful literature. AMB was supported by bivirgata flaviceps, Calliophis maculiceps and grant DEB-0515909 from the National Science Python brongersmai. Among the records made Foundation (United States). in Phetchaburi Province since Pauwels et al. (2003), the following 10 species, several rep- Literature cited resenting range extensions, were not includ- BAUER, A. M., A. DE SILVA, E. GREENBAUM & T. ed in the species expected by these authors: JACKMAN. 2007. A new species of day gecko Cnemaspis cf. kandiana, Gehyra lacerata, from high elevation in Sri Lanka, with a pre- Eutropis macularia, Scincella melanosticta, liminary phylogeny of Sri Lankan Cnemaspis Sphenomorphus cf. tersus, Varanus rudicollis, (Reptilia, Squamata, Gekkonidae). Mitteilun- Lycodon fasciatus, Orthriophis taeniurus rid- gen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin leyi, Sinomicrurus macclellandi macclellandi (Zoologie) 83, Supplement:22–32. and Xenochrophis trianguligerus. BROPHY, T. R. 2004. Geographic variation and sys- Over 25% of the species records for Phetcha- tematics in the south-east Asian turtles of the buri Province are based on the observation of genus Malayemys (Testudines: Bataguridae). a single specimen. Most search efforts were Hamadryad 29(1):63–79. concentrated in Ban Lat D. and Kaeng Krachan Dowling, H. G. 1951. A proposed standard system D., which are the only districts which benefit- of counting ventrals in snakes. British Jour- ted from dedicated herpetological surveys, and nal of Herpetology 1:97–99. where the higher species numbers were found Grossmann, W. & F. Tillack. 2004. Angaben zur (45 and 75, respectively, see Table 1). Records Haltung und Vermehrung der Breitband-Por- from other districts were made opportunistical- phyrnatter Oreophis porphyraceus laticinc- ly, except for a short survey by TC in Cha-am tus (Schulz & Helfenberger, 1998) (Squama- D.; a single record is still available from Khao ta: Colubridae). Sauria 26(1):37–44. Yoi D. and none at all for Nong Ya Plong D. Kalyabina-Hauf, S., N. B. Ananjeva, U. Joger, P. These facts clearly indicate that the herpetologi- Lenk, R. W. Murphy, B. L. Stuart, N. L. Orlov, cal exploration of Phetchaburi Province is still C. T. Ho & M. Wink. 2004. Molecular phylogeny largely incomplete, and that its reptile fauna is of the genus Acanthosaura (Agamidae). Cur- probably much richer than demonstrated. rent Herpetology 23(1):7–16. Lang, M. & W. Böhme. 1990. Description and phy- Acknowledgements logenetic position of a new species of Iso- OSGP thanks the King Léopold III Funds and pachys from central Thailand and southern its Executive Secretary Jackie Van Goethem Burma (Squamata: Scincidae). Bulletin de (IRSNB) for supporting part of the field work. l’Institut Royal des Sciences naturelles de OSGP also thanks his wife Chucheep and Belgique 60:231–240. Thongchana Chimsunchart (Phetchaburi) for Malhotra, A. & R. S. Thorpe. 2004. A phylogeny their much appreciated companionship in the of four mitochondrial gene regions suggests field. BK thanks his students Saithan Khon- a revised for Asian pitvipers (Tri- mee and Sitichok Sooksagnat (Banlatwitthaya meresurus and Ovophis). Molecular Phyloge- School) for collecting specimens. Ulrich Man- netics and Evolution 32:83–100. they (Society for Southeast Asian Herpetology, Nabhitabhata, J., T. Chan-ard & Y. Chuaynkern. Berlin) kindly helped with the identification of “2000” 2004. Checklist of amphibians and rep- the Draco picture. We are grateful to Anchalee tiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Aowphol, Kumthorn Thirakhupt (CUMZ, Policy and Planning, Bangkok. 152 pp. Bangkok) and Georges L. Lenglet (IRSNB, Nguyen, V. S., T. C. Ho & Q. T. Nguyen. 2005. Danh Brussels) for access to the collections in their luc ech nhai va bo sat Viet Nam. A checklist care, to Lawan Chanhome (Queen Saova- of amphibians and reptiles of Vietnam. Nha bha Memorial Institute, Bangkok) for assist- Xuat ban Nong Nghiep, Hanoi. 180 pp. [in ance, and to Patrick David (Muséum National Vietnamese]. d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris) for commenting the Niyomwan, P. 2004. Species diversity of her- August, 2009] Reptile diversity of Phetchaburi 21

petofauna in Khao Kra Jome, Amphur Suan 3(1):23–53. Pueng, . Journal of Wild- _____, _____, _____ & P. P. van Dijk. 2000. Pre- life in Thailand 12(1):164–176 [in Thai with liminary herpetological investigations on English abstract.] Phetchaburi Province, western Thailand. _____. 2006. New record of the subspecies Ela- In: Abstracts. Fourth Asiatic Herpetological phe porphyracea laticincta (Reptilia: Colu- Conference, Chengdu, China, 16–20 July bridae) in Thailand. Journal of Wildlife in 2000:135. Thailand 13(1):249–251 [in Thai.] _____ & B. Kheowyoo. 2004. Satlueyklan khong Pauwels, O. S. G. & T. Chan-ard. 2006. Reptiles of Amphoe Ban Lat [Reptiles of Banlat Dis- Kaeng Krachan National Park, Western Thai- trict]. Chosalao [Journal of Banlat Witthaya land. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam School] 10(2):41–43 [in Thai.] Society 54(1):89–108. Prathumthong, D. 2001. Kamnoet heng sainam _____ & P. David. 2005. Book review. Checklist of tonnam Khunwang [The source of Khun- amphibians and reptiles in Thailand, by Jaru- wang stream]. Advanced Thailand Geo- jin Nabhitabhata, Tanya Chan-ard, and Yod- graphic 7(49):150–176 [in Thai.] chaiy Chuaynkern. Herpetological Review Schulz, K.-D. 1996. A monograph of the colubrid 36(3):341–343. snakes of the genus Elaphe Fitzinger. Koeltz _____, _____ & L. Chanhome. 2004. Geographic Scientific Books, Würselen. iii + 439 pp. distribution. Elaphe taeniura ridleyi (Cave _____ & N. Helfenberger. 1998. Eine Revi- dwelling ratsnake). Herpetological Review sion des Unterarten-Komplexes der Roten 35(3):291. Bambusnatter Elaphe porphyracea (Cantor, _____, _____, _____, G. Vogel, T. Chan-ard & N. 1839). Sauria 20(1):25–45. L. Orlov. 2005. On the status of Boiga ocel- Temsiripong, Y. 2007. Pilot reintroduction of lata Kroon, 1973, with the designation of a Siamese crocodiles. Crocodile Specialist neotype for Boiga siamensis Nootpand, 1971 Group Newsletter 26(1):17–18. (Serpentes, Colubridae). Russian Journal of Vogel, G., P. David & O. S. G. Pauwels. 2004. Herpetology 12(2):102–106. A review of morphological variation in _____, _____, C. Chimsunchart & K. Thirakhupt. Trimeresurus popeiorum (Serpentes: Viperi- 2003. Reptiles of Phetchaburi Province, west- dae: Crotalinae), with the description of two ern Thailand: a list of species, with natural new species. Zootaxa 727:1–63. history notes, and a discussion on the bioge- ography at the Isthmus of Kra. Natural His- Received: 15 February 2008. tory Journal of Chulalongkorn University Accepted: 23 June 2008.