DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Marine Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coastal Marine Institute University of Alaska Coastal Marine Institute Annual Report No. 7 Fiscal Year 2000 OCS Study MMS 2000-070 This study was funded in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service (MMS), through Cooperative Agreement No. 14-35-01-98-CA-30909, Task Order No. 15161, between the MMS, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region, and the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report or product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Minerals Management Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement of recommendation for use by the Federal Government. OCS Study MMS 2000-070 University of Alaska Coastal Marine lnstitute IN COOPERATION Minerals Management Service University of Alaska State of Alaska Annual Report Federal Fiscal Year 2000 SUBMllTED BY Vera Alexander Director University of Alaska Coastal Marine lnstitute TO U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region Anchorage, Alaska November 2000 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Kachemak Bay Experimental and Monitoring Studies: Recruitment, Succession, and Recovery in Seasonally Disturbed Rocky-Intertidal Habitat [TO 1 19821 Raymond C. Highsmith, Susan M. Saupe and Amy L. Blanchard .......................................................... 3 Historical Changes in Trace Metals and Hydrocarbons in the Inner Shelf Sediments, Beaufort Sea: Prior and Subsequent to Petroleum-Related Industrial Developments [TO 14195 & 151671 A. Sathy Naidu, John J. Goenng and John J. Kelley ................................................................................. 7 An Economic Assessment of the Marine Sport Fisheries for Halibut, and Chinook and Coho Salmon in Lower Cook Inlet [TO 141961 Mark Herrmann, S. Todd Lee, Charles Hamel, Keith R. Criddle, Hans T. Geier, Joshua A. Greenberg and Carol Lewis .......................................................................... 9 Feeding Ecology of Maturing Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Nearshore Waters of the Kodiak Archipelago [TO 15 1601 Albert V. Tyler, Bruce C. McIntosh and Charles 0.Swanton ................................................................. 13 Correction Factor for Ringed Seal Surveys in Northern Alaska [TO 15 1621 Brendan P. Kelly, Lori T. Quakenbush and Brian D. Taras ................................................................... 14 Circulation, Thermohaline Structure, and Cross-Shelf Transport in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea [TO 151631 Thomas J. Weingartner and Knut Aagaard .............................................................................................. 24 The Alaskan Frozen Tissue Collection and Associated Electronic Database: A Resource for Marine Biotechnology [TO 15 1641 Joseph A. Cook, Gordon H. Jarrell, Amy M. Runck and John S. Chythlook .......................................... 3 1 Beaufort Sea Nearshore Under-Ice Currents: Science Analysis and Logistics [TO 151691 Thomas J. Weingartner ......................................................................................................................... 37 iii Kinetics and Mechanisms of Slow PAH Desorption from Lower Cook Inlet and Beaufort Sea Sediments [TO 151701 Susan M. Henrichs and John A. Terschak ................................................................................................42 An Experimental Approach to Investigate Seasonal Differences in the Role of Zooplankton in the Distribution of Hydrocarbons [TO 151711 Thomas C. Shirley and Switgard Duesterloh ...........................................................................................5 1 Seabird Samples as Resources for Marine Environmental Assessment [TO 151731 Kevin Winker .............................................................................................................................................5 5 Beaufort and Chukchi Sea Seasonal Variability for Two Arctic Climate States [TO 151741 Andrey Y. Proshutinsky, Mark A. Johnson, James A. Maslanik and Tatiana 0.Proshutinsky .....................................................................................................................59 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degrading Microbial Communities in Beaufort Sea Sediments [TO 151751 Joan F. Braddock and Kathleen A. Gannon .............................................................................................69 Regional Economic Impact Analysis of Subsistence Bowhead Whaling: Accounting for Non-Market Activities on Alaska's North Slope [TO 151761 Carol E. Lewis, Hans T. Geier, Joshua A. Greenberg, Kelly Giraud, Mark Herrmann and John J. Kelley .........................................................................................................78 New Projects .....................................................................................................................................................85 Alaska Sea Ice Atlas [TO 151771 Orson P. Smith ....................................................................................................................................85 A Nowcast/Forecast Model for the Beaufort Sea Ice-Ocean-Oil Spill System (NFM-BSIOS) [TO 151781 Jia Wang and Meibing Jin ..................................................................................................................86 Satellite Tracking of Eastern Chukchi Sea Beluga Whales in the Beaufort Sea and Arctic Ocean [TO 151791 Kathryn J. Frost and Lloyd F. Lowry ................................................................................................87 Funding Summary ............................................................................................................................................88 University of Alaska CMI Publications ...........................................................................................................9 1 Introduction The University of Alaska Coastal Marine Institute (CMI) was created by a cooperative agreement between the University of Alaska and the Minerals Management Service (MMS) in June 1993, with the first full funding cycle beginning late in (federal) fiscal year 1994. CMI is pleased to present this 2000 Annual Report, our seventh annual report. Of the 17 research projects covered, four have been completed and principal investigators are preparing their final reports. Only abstracts and study products are included for these projects. Abstracts for the three proposals funded in FY2000 are in the New Projects section. The Minerals Management Service administers the outer continental shelf (OCS) natural gas, oil, and marine minerals program in which it oversees the safe and environmentally sound leasing, exploration, and production of these resources within our nation's offshore areas. The Environmental Studies Program (ESP) was formally directed in 1978, under Section 20 of the OCS Lands Act Amendments, to provide information in support of the decisions involved in the planning, leasing, and management of exploration, development, and production activities. The research agenda is driven by the identification of specific issues, concerns, or data gaps by federal decision makers and the state and local governments that participate in the process. ESP research focuses on the following broad issues associated with development of OCS gas, oil, and minerals: What are the fates and effects of potential OCS-related pollutants (e.g., oil, noise, drilling muds and cuttings, products of fuel combustion) in the marine and coastal environment and the atmosphere? What biological resources (e.g., fish populations) exist and which resources are at risk? What is the nature and extent of the risk? What measures must be taken to allow extraction to take place? How do OCS activities affect people in terms of jobs and the economy? What are the direct and indirect effects on local culture? What are the psychological effects of the proposed OCS activities? Because MMS and individual states have distinct but complementary roles in the decision-making process, reliable scientific information is needed by MMS, the state, and localities potentially affected by OCS operations. In light of this, MMS has developed a locally managed CMI program. Under this program, MMS takes advantage of highly-qualified scientific expertise at local levels in order to: 1. Collect and disseminate environmental information needed for OCS oil & gas and marine minerals decisions; 2. Address local and regional OCS-related environmental and resource issues of mutual interest; and 3. Strengthen the partnership between MMS and the state in addressing OCS oil & gas and marine minerals information needs. CMI is administered by the University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences to address some of these mutual concerns and share the cost of research. Alaska was selected as the location for this CMI because it contains some of the major potential offshore oil and gas producing areas in the United States. The University of Alaska Fairbanks is uniquely suited to participate by virtue of its flagship status within the state and its nationally recognized marine and coastal expertise relevant to the broad range of OCS program information needs. In addition, MMS and the University of Alaska have worked cooperatively on ESP studies for many years. Research projects funded by CMI are required
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Doc. 8.50 CONVENTION on INTERNATIONAL TRADE
    Doc. 8.50 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Eighth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Kyoto (Japan), 2 to 13 March 1992 Interpretation and Implementation of the Convention CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE APPENDICES (The Kyoto Criteria) This document is submitted by Botswana, Malawi, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Background The attached draft resolution is intended to replace the existing criteria for listing species in the appendices of the Convention, for transferring species between the appendices and for deletion of species from the appendices. In addition, it incorporates and consolidates the provisions of various other Resolutions relevant to this topic and provides a basis for their removal from the list of Resolutions of the Convention. Since the Berne Criteria (Resolutions Conf. 1.1 and 1.2) have formed the basis for amendments to the appendices of the Convention since 1976, it is necessary to provide substantial justification for their replacement. General issues International trade 1. CITES was established to address international trade in wild fauna and flora. It is unable to influence the survival of species which are not exploited for trade or species which are exploited within States for domestic consumption. Perhaps the greatest threat to species is the loss or fragmentation of habitats in the countries where they occur: this problem has to be addressed through other measures. International trade may be one of the less important factors influencing the survival of the majority of species and this should be recognized. CITES is an international conservation treaty with a circumscribed role limited to those species which are genuinely threatened with extinction, or which could become so, in which there is significant international trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification to the Parties No. 2018/031
    CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA NOTIFICATION TO THE PARTIES No. 2018/031 Geneva, 26 March 2018 CONCERNING: INDIA Ban on trade in wild fauna and flora, except certain specimens of Dalbergia latifolia and Dalbergia sissoo 1. The Management Authority of India has informed the Secretariat that the Government of India has banned the export for commercial purposes of all wild-taken specimens of species included in Appendices I, II and III, subject to paragraph 2 below. 2. India permits the export of cultivated varieties of plant species included in Appendices I and II and has indicated that all products, other than the wood and wood products in the form of logs, timber, stumps, roots, bark, chips, powder, flakes, dust and charcoal, produced from wild sourced (W) Dalbergia sissoo and Dalbergia latifolia and authorized for export by a CITES Comparable Certificate issued by the competent authorities of India are exempted from the general ban. Such Dalbergia sissoo and Dalbergia latifolia specimens are harvested legally as per the regional and national laws of India and as per the prescribed management (working) plans, which are based on silvicultural principles and all are covered under Legal Procurement Certificate; all the material are sold from the Government timber depots through auction or are legally procured and can be exported legally. 3. Starting on the date of this Notification, all the CITES Comparable Certificates will be issued with a footnote, stating that the wild (W) source specimens are covered under Legal Procurement Certificate as per regional and national laws in India.
    [Show full text]
  • CITES Permits and Certificates
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service CITES Permits and Certificates What is CITES and how does it apply to specimens that quality for other me? certificates (see below). The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and ! Export Flora (CITES) protects many species of The export of Appendix-I and -II animals and plants to ensure that specimens requires an export permit. commercial demand does not threaten Such a permit may be granted when their survival in the wild. It regulates the export will not be detrimental to trade in listed species and hybrids, the species’ survival and specimens including parts and products, through a were legally acquired. system of permits. The Division of Management Authority processes For Appendix-III species originating applications for CITES permits for the from the country that listed it, an United States. Under CITES, a species export permit is required. An export is listed at one of three levels of permit may be granted when the protection, which have different permit Management Authority determines requirements. that the specimens were not obtained in contravention of that country’s laws ! Appendix I includes species presently for the protection of animals and threatened with extinction that are or plants. may be affected by trade. CITES directs its most stringent controls at ! Re-export activities involving these species. A re-export certificate is required for the export of CITES-listed specimens ! Appendix II includes species that are that were previously imported, not presently threatened with including items subsequently extinction but may become so if not converted to manufactured goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Traceability Study in Shark Products
    Traceability study in shark products Dr Heiner Lehr (Photo: © Francisco Blaha, 2015) Report commissioned by the CITES Secretariat This publication was funded by the European Union, through the CITES capacity-building project on aquatic species Contents 1 Summary.................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Structure of the remaining document ............................................................................. 9 1.2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 10 2 The market chain ................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Shark Products ............................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Shark fins ............................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Shark meat ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.3 Shark liver oil ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 Shark cartilage ....................................................................................................... 13 2.1.5 Shark skin ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
    CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Our ref.:JMS/WWW His Excellency Manmohan Singh Your ref.: Prime Minister of India Prime Minister’s Office – Room 152 South Block NEW DELHI 11001 India Geneva, 12 April 2005 Your Excellency, India was the twenty-fifth nation State to become a Party to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. India has always played a very active role in the implementation of CITES, at a national, regional and international level. It has been both a member of the Standing Committee and a host country for a meeting of the Conference of the Parties. The CITES Secretariat has enjoyed a long and close working relationship with India’s national CITES Management Authority. India’s biodiversity is known and treasured throughout the world and its various habitats contain several examples of the world’s most endangered animal and plant species. In the case of animals, in particular, the population numbers of ‘flagship’ species such as the Royal Bengal tiger and Asian elephant are important indicators for not only the health of India’s wildlife but they also serve as pointers towards the health of our planet as a whole and the success, or otherwise, of the conservation efforts of homo sapiens. It has been my pleasure and privilege to see both tigers and elephants in the wild in India. It is, therefore, with considerable personal and professional concern that I have learned recently of the results of initial surveys in some tiger reserves in India indicating what appears to be an alarming reduction in tiger numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Appropriate Uses of Iucn Red List Data
    GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF IUCN RED LIST DATA Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0) Version 3.0 (October 2016) Citation: IUCN. 2016. Guidelines for appropriate uses of IUCN Red List Data. Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0). Version 3.0. Adopted by the IUCN Red List Committee. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is the world’s most comprehensive data resource on the status of species, containing information and status assessments on over 80,000 species of animals, plants and fungi. As well as measuring the extinction risk faced by each species, the IUCN Red List includes detailed species-specific information on distribution, threats, conservation measures, and other relevant factors. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is increasingly used by scientists, governments, NGOs, businesses, and civil society for a wide variety of purposes. These Guidelines are designed to encourage and facilitate the use of IUCN Red List data and information to tackle a broad range of important conservation issues. These Guidelines give a brief introduction to The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ (hereafter called the IUCN Red List), the Red List Categories and Criteria, and the Red List Assessment process, followed by some key facts that all Red List users need to know to maximally take advantage of this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Enforcement of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species Elisabeth M
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 27 Issue 2 Article 10 25th ANNIVERSARY ALUMNI ISSUE 2002 Problems in Enforcement of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species Elisabeth M. McOmber Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Elisabeth M. McOmber, Problems in Enforcement of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, 27 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2002). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol27/iss2/10 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. PROBLEMS IN ENFORCEMENT OF THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES "Good laws, if they are not obeyed, do not constitute good government."t I. INTRODUCTION A vast number of species in the world are currently experi- encing a very serious threat of extinction that, to a large ex- tent, has been brought about by human activity As a result, species are being brought to the brink of extinction at an alarming rate. In 1994, available figures indicated that there were thirty million or more species in the world, and that 20% could be extinct by the year 2000.2 In 1996, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature ("IUCN") estimated that a total of 11,046 species of plants and animals were facing a high risk of extinction in the near future, a figure that included 24% of mammal species and 12% of bird species.3 In 2000, the IUCN enumerated 18,276 species and subspecies on its list of endangered species, including a total of 520 species of mam- mals and 503 species of birds.4 While habitat destruction is arguably the most serious threat to endangered species,5 the t ARISTOTLE, PoLITICs (Ernest Barker trans., Oxford University Press 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT of 13 July 2012
    THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES: STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2020 Citation: IUCN Red List Committee. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Strategic Plan 2017 - 2020. Prepared by the IUCN Red List Committee. Cover images (left to right) and photographer credits: IUCN & Intu Boehihartono; Brian Stockwell; tigglrep (via Flickr under CC licence); IUCN & Gillian Eborn; Gianmarco Rojas; Michel Roggo; IUCN & Imene Maliane; IUCN & William Goodwin; IUCN & Christian Winter The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM Strategic Plan 2017 – 2020 2 THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES: STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2020 January 2017 The IUCN Red List Partnership ............................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 The IUCN Red List: a key conservation tool ....................................................................... 6 The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Strategic Plan 2017-2020 ......................... 7 Result 1. IUCN Red List taxonomic and geographic coverage is expanded ............. 8 Result 2. More IUCN Red List Assessments are prepared at national and, where appropriate, at regional scales .......................................................................................... 8 Result 3. Selected species groups are periodically reassessed to allow the IUCN Red List Index to be widely used as an effective biodiversity indicator. ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Bluefin Tuna and CITES
    OCEANA/Keith Ellenbogen Atlantic Bluefin Tuna and CITES Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) has been driven to the edge of collapse by overfishing and the demand for international trade. This top predator has been traditionally harvested in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea through traditional fishing activity like tuna traps, but in recent decades an industrial fishing industry with high tech purse seine gear has been widely developed, fuelled by government subsidies. The activity of this huge fleet has focused on the main spawning areas in the Mediterranean Sea, where bluefin tuna aggregate to spawn in the spring-summer season.1 The development of this fleet has been accompanied by the development of fattening farms all along the Mediterranean coast, allowing the industry to control both the market and the fisheries. Additionally, the whole industrial activity has been characterised by high percentages of catch misreporting and illegal fishing, leading to higher levels of overfishing. In the western Atlantic Ocean, overfishing led to the adoption of a rebuilding plan in 1999, but this plan has proved unable to recover the stock, with actual catches below the agreed quotas.2 This depleted stock has not shown the needed signs of rebuilding since the plan was adopted. Despite all the clear alarms, the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), the organisation that brings together all of the countries responsible for managing this tuna fishery, has repeatedly ignored scientific advice and
    [Show full text]
  • Cop18 Prop. 51
    Original language: English CoP18 Prop. 51 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Eighteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Colombo (Sri Lanka), 23 May – 3 June 2019 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal The proponents propose delisting of Dalbergia sissoo DC., from CITES Appendix II as it does not meet the listing criteria set out in Article II [(paragraphs 2(a)]of the Convention text or the criteria laid down in Annex 2(a) of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP17). The species is widely distributed and in India it is found abundantly in wild and on cultivation as well. The species has very fast growth rate and capacity to become naturalized outside of its native range, even it is invasive in some parts of the world. The regulation of trade in the species is not necessary to avoid it becoming eligible for inclusion in Appendix I in the near future and the harvest of specimens from the wild is not reducing the wild population to a level at which its survival might be threatened by continued harvesting or other influences. B. Proponent Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal*: C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Magnoliopsida 1.2 Order: Fabales 1.3 Familly: Fabaceae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: DalbergiaL. f.1781 [1782] 1.5 Scientific synonyms: Amerimnon sissoo (Roxb. ex DC.) Kuntze 1.6 Common names: English: Indian rosewood, Himalaya raintree, Indian Dalbergia, Penny leaf tree, Sisso French: Spanish: 1.7 Code numbers: Not available 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 CITES Listed Species
    Dutch Caribbean Species of High Conservation Value 4 CITES listed species 4.1 Notes on CITES Species CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international agreement between governments. Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. In the CITES legislation organisms are classified in 3 categories depending on how endangered they are thought to be, or the degree of protection they are thought to need (CITES-Website 2012); ! Appendix I includes species threatened with extinction. Trade in specimens of these species is permitted only in exceptional circumstances. Import and export or re-export permits are required, issued by the Management Authority of the State of Import, Export or Re-Export. ! Appendix II includes species where trade is allowed but restricted. An export or re-export certificate is required, but no import permit is needed unless required by national law. ! Appendix III are species in which trade is allowed but monitored. An export permit must be issued by the Management Authority of the State that included the species in Appendix III. 4.2 Summary data CITES I CITES II CITES I CITES II CITES Dutch Caribbean 15 189 Saba 16 153 Marine 12 1120 Marine 5 115 Terrestrial 3 68 Terrestrial 1 36 Aruba 7 124 St Eustatius 160 159 Marine 4 102 Marine 5 115 Terrestrial 3 21 Terrestrial 1 43 Bonaire 17 153 St Maarten 16 152 Marine 5 115 Marine 5 115 Terrestrial 2 31 Terrestrial 1 33 Curaçao 17 158 Marine 6 115 Terrestrial 1 36 CITES listed species 31 November 2012 Dutch Caribbean Species of High Conservation Value 4.3 CITES I 4.3.1 Marine CITES Appendix I species Common Group Name English Name Scientific name Notes Aruba Bonaire Curaçao Saba Eustatius St.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop16 Inf. 32 (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais)
    CoP16 Inf. 32 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok (Thailand), 3-14 March 2013 CITES TRADE: RECENT TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN APPENDIX II-LISTED SPECIES (1996-2010) The attached document* has been submitted by the Secretariat in relation to agenda item 21 on Capacity building. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP16 Inf. 32 – p. 1 CITES Trade: recent trends in international trade in Appendix II‐listed species (1996‐2010) CITES Project No. S‐383 Prepared for the CITES Secretariat by United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre December 2012 PREPARED FOR CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. This report was made possible as a result of the generous CITATION financial support by the European Commission. CITES Secretariat (2012). CITES Trade: recent trends in international trade in Appendix II‐listed species This publication may be reproduced for educational (1996‐2010). Prepared by UNEP‐WCMC, Cambridge. or non‐profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement to the source is made. Reuse of any figures is subject to permission from the original rights holders. No use of this publication © Copyright: 2012, CITES Secretariat may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose without permission in writing from CITES.
    [Show full text]