Archaeological Overview Assessment of the Squamish Forest District TECHNICAL REPORT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archaeological Overview Assessment of the Squamish Forest District TECHNICAL REPORT Archaeological Overview Assessment of the Squamish Forest District TECHNICAL REPORT Submitted to: The Ministry ofForests, Squamish Forest District and Archaeology Branch, Ministry ofSmall Business, Tourism and Culture (pennits 1997-85, 1997-112, 1997-119) In-SHUCK-chIN'Quat'qua Li}'wat Nation Musqueam Band Sto:lo Nation Canada Squamish Nation (pennit 1996-12) Tseil-Waututh First Nation by: Millennia Research Ltd. #204-10114 McDonald Park Road, North Saanich, B.C. V8L 5X8 Telephone: (250) 656-0450 Fax: (250) 656-0453 July 30, 1997 Project Credits Supervisor Morley Eldridge Director Tanja Hoffmann Report Authors Tanja Hoffmann Morley Eldridge Rob Vincent Jennifer Lindberg Tina Christensen David O'Regan AlexMaas First Nations Liaison Tanja Hoffmann D'AnnOwens GIS Modelling Steve Lipscomb Sean Whitford Timberline Forest Inventory Consultants Ltd Morley Eldridge Trail Research RobDiaz Tad MacIlwraith Meredith Bogle Traditions Consulting Services Inc. Editing Morley Eldridge Tanja Hoffmann Rod Istace Kat Roberts Peter Dady AlexMaas Field Crew Tanja Hoffmann, David O'Regan, Tina Christensen, Kat Roberts and Peter Dady Millennia Research Amelia, Alan Jr, Des, John Sam, John James, Charles, Deb Morice DePoli, Doug Hudson and all other participants from In­ SHUCK-ch Johnnie Abraham, Elmer Dan, Johnny Jones, and Sue Montgomery for Lil'wat Naiton Rudy Riemer for Squamish Nation Final Report Squamish Forest DistrictADA Millennia Research 2 July 3D, 1997 Acknowledgements A project ofthis size and scope involves the time and commitment ofa great many people. First and foremost we must thank Diane Reed ofthe Squamish Forest District, Ministry ofForests for her dedication to this project and the patience she exhibited at all stages ofthe AOA. We must also thank those First Nations who welcomed Tanja to their territories and treated me with so much respect and kindness. We wish to thank Johnny Jones ofthe LiI'wat Nation for his friendship, guidance and understanding and Elmer Dan and Johnnie Abraham for their in-field expertise and patience. In addition we would like to acknowledge the guidance and support we received from Lyle Leo, Grace Prasad, Sue Montgomery, and the Lil'wat Forestry office staffduring my time in the Lil'wat community. Sara Brown and Shannon Squire are also deserving ofthanks for their warm hospitality during Tanja's trips to the Pemberton area. Heather Myles ofSto:lo Nation Canada has provided valuable comments and suggestions throughout the course ofthe last year. Thank you Heather! We must also thank Tony Moody, Randal Louis and the Squamish Nation for their understanding and patience. Thanks is extended to Rudy Reimer for his excellent field work. In addition, Arnoud Stryd, at meetings with the Squamish Nation, provided much appreciated guidance regarding the application ofthe archaeological potential model in the Squamish Nation territory. Leona Sparrow ofthe Musqueam graciously provided her comments and suggestions for the project. The staff at the In-SHUCK-chlN'Quat'qua welcomed Tanja into their midst and deserve special thanks. In particular, Collete Hogue, treaty analyst for In-SHUCK­ chlN'Quat'qua and Doug Hudson, anthropologist, gave oftheir time and expertise which has been greatly appreciated. Thanks must also go to the people ofSkookumchuck and Baptiste Smith for welcoming our crew. Dez, John Sam, John James, Amelia, Allan Jr., and all the other participants deserve special thanks for provding us with a great deal ofhelp in the field. Special thanks must go to Steve Lipscomb and Sean Whitford at Timberline for their patience and guidance throughout this project. We credit much ofthe success ofthis project to their hard work and dedication. Doug Glaum at the Archaeology Branch provided a great deal ofmuch needed advice and throughout the course ofthis project has exhibited patience and fortitude in the face ofmy never-ending stream ofquestions. Thank you Doug. Trail research for the Squamish AOA was done by Rob Diaz and Tad MacIlwraith ofTraditions Consulting Services Inc. with the assistance ofMeredith Bogle. Thanks is extended to them for their assistance and hard work. In addition John Spittle ofNorth Final Report Squamish Forest District ADA Millennia Research 3 July 30, 1997 Vancouver spent an afternoon ofhis time discussing trails with me and provided some very interesting information for the AOA. Thank you Mr. Spittle. Finally, I (Tanja) must thank the staffat Millennia Research for putting up with my occasionally incoherent rumblings and surplus energy. Morley Eldridge provided overall guidance, support and technical expertise for the project; thank you Morley! Appreciation and thanks must be extended to the members ofMillennia staffwho contributed to this report, they include: D'Ann Owens, David O'Regan, Kat Roberts, Tina Christensen, Jennifer Lindberg, Peter Dady and Rob Vmcent. In addition, special thanks goes to Rod Istace and Alex Maas for their editing assistance and to Donna Eckert for keeping all ofour lives in order. Final Report Squamish Forest District AOA Millennia Research 4 July 30, J997 Management Summary In January of 1996 Millennia Research was contracted to conduct an Archaeological Overview Assessment (AOA) ofthe Squamish Forest District (Archaeology Branch Permits 1997-085, 1997-112, 1997-119; Squamish Nation Permit 1996-12). In conjunction with Timberline Forestry Consultants, Millennia produced a model and a series of I:20,000 scale potential maps which delineate areas ofarchaeological potential within the boundaries ofthe Squamish Forest District. The model used to produce the potential polygons for each site type (habitation, rock art, sub-alpine camp and culturally modified tree [CMT]) was based upon sets of variables which were determined to be consistent for a particular site type (i.e. habitation sites are likely to be located close to water on a relatively flat piece ofland etc.). All variables for each site-type model were loaded into the GIS and, using TRIM data, topographic and elevation information, the GIS produced maps which detail polygons of high and moderate potential. Low potential areas are considered to be all those not differentiated as moderate or high. Following the application ofthe original model, base-line data in the form of recorded (at the Archaeology Branch) and known (to the First Nations) sites were used to test the model. Initial analysis revealed that a majority ofthe recorded and known sites were not being caught in archaeological potential polygons. Consequently, model variable parameters were adjusted and reapplied in order to ensure that the majority ofknown sites were caught and also to increase the chance that similar, unrecorded sites would be caught. In-field testing ofthe model revealed that the GIS generated potential maps closely predicted the landscape and delineate areas ofarchaeological potential. However, the field tests provided some data upon which refinements for individual models were made. Particularly it was shown that the slope from TRIM maps was too generalized for the Rock Art Model and therefore this model was abandoned. The Squamish AOA has resulted in a series ofmaps which delineate areas of archaeological potential. The final maps are labelled as high, medium or low potential. It is recommended that all areas identified as high potential for archaeological sites be subject to an AlA and areas ofmoderate potential a RECCE. Although not required, it is strongly recommended that RECCEs be conducted under an Archaeology Branch permit so as to maintain a standard methodological approach and quality results. Minimum methodological requirements for both AlAs and RECCEs are presented in the recommendations section ofthis report. Areas defined as high or moderate potential for CMTs only can be subjected to an CMT Inventory as opposed to an AlA or RECCE. CMT inventories can be conducted by forestry personnel and/or First Nations individuals trained in CMT identification and recording. Final Report Squamish Forest District AOA Millennia Research 5 July 30, 1997 Table of Contents PROJECT CREDITS 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 LIST OF FIGURES 10 LIST OF TABLES 10 INTRODUCTION 12 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 14 Information Conjidentiality 14 PROJECT TEAM 16 REPORTFORMAT 18 TERMINOLOOY 19 STUDY OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS 19 Predictive Modeling in Cultural Resource Management 19 THE PREsENT STUDY 22 DISCUSSIONS WITII mE FIRST NATIONS 23 ARCHAEOLOOICALCONSULTATION 23 COMMON THEMES 23 PROPOSED PROJECT 25 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND POTENTIALIMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOOICAL SITES 25 Logging 25 Access Roads 26 Ancillary Developments 26 Reforestation 27 NATURAL FACTORS LEADING TO THE DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF ARCHAEOLOOICAL SITES 27 Avalanching 27 Landslides 27 Contemporary andAncient Glacial Action 27 Flooding andSpring Run-ofJ. 28 STUDY AREA 29 lNTRoDUCTlON 29 PREsENTBIOPHYSICAL CONTEXT 29 Biogeoclimatic Zones 30 PALAEOGEOGRAPHy 32 Palaeoclimate and Palaeoecology: Models 33 Effects ofPalaeoenvironmental Change on the Archaeological Record 34 Modem Alterations to the Environment 35 • SQUAMISH AOA MEmODOLOGY 39 MODELLING METHODOLOGy 39 PREDICTIVE MODELLING 39 DEFINmONS OF HIGH, MEDIUM AND Low POTENTIAL 40 Final Report Squamish Forest DistrictAOA Millennia Research 7 JUly 30, 1997 GIS Layers and Coverage 40 Dataset1 41 Site Types andModels 43 Dataset11.. 45 Anecdotal Information Layer 45 FIELD WORK METHODOLOGy 46 DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH RESULTS 49 ETHNOGRAPHIC LITERATURE REVIEW 49 Linguistic and Cultural Classifications
Recommended publications
  • Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Official Community
    Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 CONSOLIDATED COPY March 2015 IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS IS AN UNOFFICIAL CONSOLIDATION OF BYLAW NO. 689 WHICH HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. Although the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District is careful to assure the accuracy of all information presented in this consolidation, you should confirm all information before making any decisions based on it. Information can be confirmed through the SLRD Planning Department. Official Community Plan Bylaw 689 (Consolidated for Convenience Only) March 2015 SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY Consolidated bylaws are consolidated for convenience only and are merely representative. Each consolidated bylaw consists of the original bylaw text and maps, together with current amendments which have been made to the original version. Copies of all bylaws (original and amendments) may be obtained from the SLRD Planning and Development Department. BY-LAW NO. DATE OF ADOPTION 1008 - 2008 Major Review of Area C OCP April 27, 2009 Creating a Medical Marihuana Production Facility 1311 – 2014 October 27, 2014 Development Permit Area Designating the Whistler Waldorf School at WedgeWoods as 1368-2014 March 18, 2015 Institutional Page | 2 Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689 Official Community Plan Bylaw 689 (Consolidated for Convenience Only) March 2015 SQUAMISH LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1008, 2008 A by-law of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999. WHEREAS the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District wishes to adopt a new Electoral Area C Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Regional Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 12.0: Aborigin Al Consultation
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE APPLICATION WesPac Tilbury Marine Jetty Project ABORIGINAL ABORIGINAL : 0 . 12 CONSULTATION SECTION SECTION WesPac Tilbury Marine Jetty Project Environmental Assessment Certificate Application Part C – Aboriginal Consultation Section 12.0: Aboriginal Consultation 12.0 ABORIGINAL CONSULTATION Aboriginal Interests are defined in the Section 11 Order (BCEAO, 2015b) as asserted or determined Aboriginal rights, including title, and treaty rights. An overview of planned consultation activities for the Project, activities completed to date, and a description of Aboriginal Interests is provided in Section 12.1 Aboriginal Interests. The assessment of Project-related effects on those Aboriginal Interests is presented in Section 12.1.4 Potential Effects of the Project on Aboriginal Interests. Issues raised by Aboriginal groups that do not directly relate to Aboriginal Interests, such as those pertaining to potential adverse social, economic, heritage, or health effects, and proposed measures to address those effects, are described in Section 12.2 Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal groups. The assessment of effects on Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal groups is also found in Section 12.2 Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal groups. Section 12.3 provides the Issue Summary Table that summarizes Aboriginal Interests or other matters of concern to Aboriginal groups that may be affected by the Project, and the measures to avoid, mitigate or otherwise manage those effects. Information presented in this Application
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Assessment
    COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Abstract This Community Risk Assessment is a component of the SLRD Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. A Community Risk Assessment is the foundation for any local authority emergency management program. It informs risk reduction strategies, emergency response and recovery plans, and other elements of the SLRD emergency program. Evaluating risks is a requirement mandated by the Local Authority Emergency Management Regulation. Section 2(1) of this regulation requires local authorities to prepare emergency plans that reflects their assessment of the relative risk of occurrence, and the potential impact, of emergencies or disasters on people and property. SLRD Emergency Program [email protected] Version: 1.0 Published: January, 2021 SLRD Community Risk Assessment SLRD Emergency Management Program Executive Summary This Community Risk Assessment (CRA) is a component of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District (SLRD) Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and presents a survey and analysis of known hazards, risks and related community vulnerabilities in the SLRD. The purpose of a CRA is to: • Consider all known hazards that may trigger a risk event and impact communities of the SLRD; • Identify what would trigger a risk event to occur; and • Determine what the potential impact would be if the risk event did occur. The results of the CRA inform risk reduction strategies, emergency response and recovery plans, and other elements of the SLRD emergency program. Evaluating risks is a requirement mandated by the Local Authority Emergency Management Regulation. Section 2(1) of this regulation requires local authorities to prepare emergency plans that reflect their assessment of the relative risk of occurrence, and the potential impact, of emergencies or disasters on people and property.
    [Show full text]
  • Squamish Community: Our People and Places Teacher’S Package
    North Vancouver MUSEUM & ARCHIVES SCHOOL PROGRAMS 2018/19 Squamish Community: Our People and Places Teacher’s Package Grade 3 - 5 [SQUAMISH COMMUNITY: OUR PEOPLE AND PLACES KIT] Introduction SQUAMISH COMMUNITY: OUR PEOPLE AND PLACES KIT features 12 archival photographs selected from the Skwxwú7mesh Úxwumixw: The Squamish Community: Our People and Places exhibit presented at the North Vancouver Museum & Archives in 2010. This exhibit was a collaborative project undertaken by the North Vancouver Museum & Archives and the Squamish Nation. These archival images were selected by the Squamish Elders and Language Authority to represent local landscapes, the community and the individual people within the Squamish Nation. The Squamish Elders and Language Authority also contributed to the exhibit labels which are included on the reverse of each picture. This Kit has been designed to complement BC’s Social Studies curriculum for grades 3 - 5, giving students the opportunity to explore themes related to First Nations cultures in the past and cultural First Nations activities today. Included within this Kit is a detailed teacher’s package that provides instructors with lesson plan activities that guide students in the analysis of archival photographs. The recommended activities encourage skills such as critical thinking and cooperative learning. Altogether, the lesson plan activities are estimated to take 1 hour and 45 minutes and can easily be stretched across several instructional days. Through photo analysis worksheets and activities, students will be introduced to the Squamish Nation and historical photographs. Teachers are encouraged to read through the program and adapt it to meet the learning abilities and individual needs of their students.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Knowledge and Ecosystem Reconstruction
    Back to the Future in the Strait of Georgia, page 21 PART 2: CULTURAL INPUTS TO THE STRAIT OF GEORGIA ECOSYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION BTF project was based on archival research and Aboriginal Knowledge and interviews with Elders from Aboriginal Ecosystem Reconstruction communities. The main purpose of the interviews was to frame a picture of how the ecosystem might have been in the past, based on traditional Silvia Salas, Jo-Ann Archibald* knowledge of resource use by aboriginal people. & Nigel Haggan This information was expected to validate and complement archival information was also Fisheries Centre, UBC describing the state of past natural system. *First Nations House of Learning, UBC Methods The BTF project involved the reconstruction of Abstract present and past ecosystems in the Strait of Georgia (SoG), based on a model constructed at a The ‘Back To The Future’ (BTF) project uses workshop held in November 1995 at the Fisheries ecosystem modelling and other information Centre, the University of British Columbia, sources to visualize how the Strait of Georgia Canada (Pauly and Christensen, 1996). Different ecosystem might have been in the past. This sources of information (see Wallace, this vol.) paper explores the potential of integrating were used to tune and update that model. traditional environmental knowledge (TEK) of Reconstruction of the system as it might have aboriginal people in ecosystem modeling. been 100 ago was based on archival records, Methods include archival research and interviews historic documents and written testimonies, as with First Nation Elders from different regions of well as interviews carried out in three First the Strait of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver
    Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver J EAN BARMAN1 anada has become increasingly urban. More and more people choose to live in cities and towns. Under a fifth did so in 1871, according to the first census to be held after Canada C 1867 1901 was formed in . The proportion surpassed a third by , was over half by 1951, and reached 80 percent by 2001.2 Urbanization has not benefited Canadians in equal measure. The most adversely affected have been indigenous peoples. Two reasons intersect: first, the reserves confining those deemed to be status Indians are scattered across the country, meaning lives are increasingly isolated from a fairly concentrated urban mainstream; and second, the handful of reserves in more densely populated areas early on became coveted by newcomers, who sought to wrest them away by licit or illicit means. The pressure became so great that in 1911 the federal government passed legislation making it possible to do so. This article focuses on the second of these two reasons. The city we know as Vancouver is a relatively late creation, originating in 1886 as the western terminus of the transcontinental rail line. Until then, Burrard Inlet, on whose south shore Vancouver sits, was home to a handful of newcomers alongside Squamish and Musqueam peoples who used the area’s resources for sustenance. A hundred and twenty years later, apart from the hidden-away Musqueam Reserve, that indigenous presence has disappeared. 1 This article originated as a paper presented to the Canadian Historical Association, May 2007. I am grateful to all those who commented on it and to Robert A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Miners' Meetings and Mining Boards: the Development of Mining Law In
    Miners’ Meetings and Mining Boards: The Development of Mining Law in Colonial British Columbia, 1858-1867 Thomas Oscar Mills A Thesis in The Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada September 2016 © Thomas Oscar Mills, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Thomas Oscar Mills Entitled: Miners’ Meetings and Mining Boards: The Development of Mining Law in Colonial British Columbia, 1858-1867 and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Dr. Barbara Lorenzkowski Chair Dr. Eric H. Reiter Examiner Dr. Gavin Taylor Examiner Dr. Wilson Chacko Jacob Supervisor Approved by Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director Dean of Faculty Date Abstract Miners’ Meetings and Mining Boards: The Development of Mining Law in Colonial British Columbia, 1858-1867 Thomas Oscar Mills Miners’ meetings were a customary legal practice from California that was imported to British Columbia during the Fraser River gold rush (1858). To date, there has been limited recognition of this practice’s influence on the development of British Columbia. The historical works that do exist on the subject argue that the practice was not established in the colony owing to the Colonial Government’s allowance for Mining Boards, a representative institution, by The Gold Fields Act, 1859. To the contrary, this thesis looks at the different ways that miners’ meetings and miners’ customary law were expressed and adapted to conditions in British Columbia before and after the passing of The Gold Fields Act, 1859.
    [Show full text]
  • Birken Buddhist Forest MONASTERY: Asian Migration, the Creative Class, and Cultural Transformation in the New Pacific British Columbia
    Birken Buddhist Forest MONASTERY: Asian Migration, the Creative Class, and Cultural Transformation in the New Pacific British Columbia Luke Clossey and Karen Ferguson* ne night in the mid-1990s police and ambulance responded to a medical emergency at a broken-down shack on the road between Mount Currie and D’Arcy in the Birkenhead Valley Onear Pemberton, two hundred kilometres north of Vancouver in the Coast Mountain range. Bumping their heads against the low doorframe, they were surprised to find inside a collapsed neighbour from down the road being tended to by a dozen young Thai women, a thirty-year-old German man, and a Canadian in his early forties. The men were wearing ochre robes and were bald, beardless, and eyebrow-less. This was Birken Forest Monastery. The Canadian was Venerable (Ven.) Sona (né Tom West), a Buddhist monk born and brought up mostly in the suburbs of Vancouver but now following the orthodox Thai forest tradition of Theravada Buddhism. In June1994 , he travelled from the Sri Lankan Buddhist Vihara Society (BVS) temple in Surrey, BC, to a cluster of unwinterized, off-grid shacks on the gold rush–era Pemberton Portage Road near Pemberton. There, along with his German-born fellow monk, Ven. Piyadhammo, he succeeded in establishing only the second North American foothold of the Thai forest tradition founded by a non-Asian monk.1 This tradition has since spread globally to become one of the most successful Theravada monastic orders outside Asia, particularly among non-Asian converts. * We’re grateful to our research participants for their generosity in sharing their memories with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Snow Avalanche Threats and Mitigation Measures in Canada
    CURRENT AND FUTURE SNOW AVALANCHE THREATS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CANADA Prepared for: Public Safety Canada Prepared by: Cam Campbell, M.Sc.1 Laura Bakermans, M.Sc., P.Eng.2 Bruce Jamieson, Ph.D., P.Eng.3 Chris Stethem4 Date: 2 September 2007 1 Canadian Avalanche Centre, Box 2759, Revelstoke, B.C., Canada, V0E 2S0. Phone: (250) 837-2748. Fax: (250) 837-4624. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW. Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW. Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4, Canada. Phone: (403) 220-7479. Fax: (403) 282-7026. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Chris Stethem and Associates Ltd., 120 McNeill, Canmore, AB, Canada, T1W 2R8. Phone: (403) 678-2477. Fax: (403) 678-346. E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the Public Safety Canada funded project to inventory current and predict future trends in avalanche threats and mitigation programs in Canada. The project also updated the Natural Resources Canada website and map of fatal avalanche incidents. Avalanches have been responsible for at least 702 fatalities in Canada since the earliest recorded incident in 1782. Sixty-one percent of these fatalities occurred in British Columbia, with 13% in Alberta, 11% in Quebec and 10% in Newfoundland and Labrador. The remainder occurred in Ontario, Nova Scotia and the Yukon, Northwest and Nunavut Territories. Fifty-three percent of the fatalities were people engaged in recreational activities, while 18% were people in or near buildings, 16% were travelling or working on transportation corridors and 8% were working in resource industries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 Mountaineer Outings
    The Mountaineer The Mountaineer 1969 Cover Photo: Mount Shuksan, near north boundary North Cascades National Park-Lee Mann Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during June by The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington 98111. Clubroom is at 7191h Pike Street, Seattle. Subscription price monthly Bulletin and Annual, $5.00 per year. EDITORIAL STAFF: Alice Thorn, editor; Loretta Slat­ er, Betty Manning. Material and photographs should be submitted to The Mountaineers, at above address, before Novem­ ber 1, 1969, for consideration. Photographs should be black and white glossy prints, 5x7, with caption and photographer's name on back. Manuscripts should be typed double-spaced and include writer's name, address and phone number. foreword Since the North Cascades National Park was indubi­ tably the event of this past year, this issue of The Mountaineer attempts to record aspects of that event. Many other magazines and groups have celebrated by now, of course, but hopefully we have managed to avoid total redundancy. Probably there will be few outward signs of the new management in the park this summer. A great deal of thinking and planning is in progress as the Park Serv­ ice shapes its policies and plans developments. The North Cross-State highway, while accessible by four­ wheel vehicle, is by no means fully open to the public yet. So, visitors and hikers are unlikely to "see" the changeover to park status right away. But the first articles in this annual reveal both the thinking and work which led to the park, and the think­ ing which must now be done about how the park is to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No
    Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1484-2017 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1484-2017 A bylaw of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District to adopt an Official Community Plan for Electoral Area C WHEREAS the Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District wishes to adopt a new Electoral Area C Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1484-2017”. 2. Schedule A, being the text of the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan, is attached to and forms part of this bylaw. 3. Schedule B, being the Plan Maps of the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan, is attached to and forms part of this bylaw. 4. Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 689-1999 (including all amendments thereto) is repealed. READ A FIRST TIME this 24th day of May, 2017 READ A SECOND TIME this 26th day of July, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING held on the xx day of month, year READ A THIRD TIME xx day of month, year ADOPTED this _______________________ _______________________ Chair, Kristen Clark, Jack Crompton Corporate Officer Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1484-2017 SCHEDULE A Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 1.1 Definitions . .. 3 1.2 Purpose and Required Content . 4 1.3 Scope / Plan Area . 4 1.4 Review and Amendment of the Plan .
    [Show full text]
  • Island Bushwhacker Annual 2009
    THE ALPINE CLUB OF CANADA VANCOUVER ISLAND SECTION ISLAND BUSHWHACKER ANNUAL VOLUME 37, 2009 VANCOUVER ISLAND SECTION of THE ALPINE CLUB OF CANADA SECTION EXECUTIVE – 2009 Chair Cedric Zala Secretary Rick Hudson Treasurer Geoff Bennett Banff Mountain Film Festival Lissa Zala Kari Frazer Bushwhacker Committee Sandy Briggs Lindsay Elms Rob Macdonald Russ Moir Bushwhacker Design & Layout Sandy Stewart Education Peter Rothermel Dave Campbell Equipment Mike Hubbard FMCBC Rep John Young Library/Archivist Judith Holm Membership Jain Alcock-White Members at Large Phee Hudson Russ Moir Mike Morley Dave Campbell National Rep Russ Moir Newsletter Cedric Zala Safety Selena Swets Schedule Karun Thanjavur Webmaster/Listserver Martin Hofmann ACC VI Section website: www.accvi.ca ACC National website: www.alpineclubofcanada.ca ISSN 0822 - 9473 Cover: Looking east from Springer Peak to Johnstone Strait, June 2009. PHOTO: DAVE CAMPBELL Printed on recycled paper Contents Message from the Chair Cedric Zala ..............................................................................................................................................................................................1 VANCOUVER ISLAND Colonel Foster – On a Sunny Summer’s Day Christine Fordham ............................................................................................3 Mount Phillips from Arnica Lakes Dave Campbell ....................................................................................................................4 Victoria Peak: First Winter Ascent
    [Show full text]