DOCSLIB.ORG

Judicial Statistics of Pakistan 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judicial Statistics of Pakistan 2009 Judicial Statistics of Pakistan 2009 National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee Published by the Secretariat of Law & Justice Commission of Pakistan, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad. www.ljcp.gov.pk Foreword With great pleasure I present the Annual Report for the year 2009 on Judicial Statistics of Pakistan which contains judicial data of the superior courts, namely the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court, 4 Provincial High Courts and the District Courts. The importance of this Report has increased many folds especially after the implementation of the National Judicial Policy‐2009 for enabling the people to know how the courts in the country are striving to provide expeditious justice to the public. It will also enable the Courts to ensure transparency and accountability within the justice system. It is towards this goal that the present Report has been prepared by the Secretariat of the Law & Justice Commission of Pakistan, as mandated by the National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee. It provides detailed information about the judicial system, sanctioned strength of the judicial as well as administrative staff and annual budget of courts. The Report is going to be published with some delay, due to time consumed in collecting detailed judicial data from various courts. It is hoped that the data provided in the Report will be useful for the judiciary to make plans for addressing the problem of backlog and gradual increase in litigation. It can also be utilized by researchers, judges and lawyers for the analysis of the performance of the courts and for proposing solutions to problems faced by the judicial system of Pakistan. The Secretariat of LJCP will make sure that the Report reaches the libraries of public/private sector, institutions, justice system related agencies, law schools and libraries of the courts and the Bar Councils/Associations for their valuable comments & suggestions. (Dr. Faqir Hussain) Secretary 2 Supreme Court of Pakistan 3 2. Supreme Court of Pakistan 2.1 Statement showing list of Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan Date of Date of NAMES Date of Birth Elevation Retirement 04.02.2000 Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, as Judge, 12.12.1948 11.12.2013 Hon'ble Chief Justice of Pakistan 30.06.2005 as HCJP Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal 01.08.1946 28.04.2000 31.07.2011 Mr. Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan 18.08.1947 31.07.2004 17.08.2012 Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani 06.07.1949 31.07.2004 05.07.2014 Mr. Justice Nasir‐ul‐Mulk 17.08.1950 05.04.2005 16.08.2015 Mr. Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed 01.06.1946 14.09.2005 31.05.2011 Mr. Justice Ch. Ijaz Ahmed 05.05.1945 14.09.2005 04.05.2010 Mr. Justice Sayed Zahid Hussain 15.12.1949 14.04.2009 14.12.2014 Mr. Justice Muhammad Sair Ali 12.12.1946 14.04.2009 11.12.2011 Mr. Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui 14.10.1946 14.04.2009 13.10.2011 Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja 10.09.1950 05.06.2009 09.09.2015 Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali 31.12.1951 03.08.2009 30.12.2016 Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain 13.04.1949 07.09.2009 12.04.2014 Mr. Justice Rehmat Hussain Jaffery 22.11.1945 07.09.2009 21.11.2010 Mr. Justice Tariq Parvez 15.02.1948 20.10.2009 14.02.2013 14.09.2006 then on 19.10.2009 Mr. Justice Ghulam Rabbani 20.10.1944 20.10.2009 then on (Ad hoc Judge w.e.f.20.10.2009 for 2 years) as Adhoc 19.10.2011 Judge Mr. Justice Khalil‐ur‐Rehman Ramday 13.01.1945 10‐01‐2002 12.01.2010 2.2. Statistics on the Institution and Disposal of Cases during the year 2009. Statement Showing Institutions, Disposal and Pendency of Cases at Islamabad (From 1‐1‐2009 to 31‐12‐2009) PETITIONS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Petition 1256 2337 3593 3049 544 Criminal Petition 284 936 1220 752 468 Civil Review Petition 500 190 690 360 330 Criminal Review 267 238 505 202 303 Petition/Crl.O.P. Civil/Crl. Sh. Petition 55 49 104 61 43 /Crl.Sh. R. P. Jail Petition & Jail 725 517 1242 397 845 Shariat Petition Constitution Petition 129 62 191 24 167 Total 3216 4329 7545 4845 2700 APPEALS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Appeal 5510 1601 7111 1883 5228 Criminal Appeal 1818 666 2484 624 1860 Criminal Shariat Appeal 20 50 70 35 35 Civil Shariat Appeal 68 5 73 17 56 Total 7416 2322 9738 2559 7179 OTHERS MATTERS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civ. & Crl. Misc. 971 884 1855 770 1085 Application Civil & Crl.M.Appeals / 155 100 255 70 185 C.U.O. Suo Motu Cases /H.R. 41 114 155 115 40 Cases Total 1167 1098 2265 955 1310 5 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR ISLAMABAD Balance as on Balance as on Description Institution Total Disposal Remarks 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Decreased Petitions 3216 4329 7545 4845 2700 by 516 Decreased Appeals 7416 2322 9738 2559 7179 by 237 Increased Others matters 1167 1098 2265 955 1310 by 143 Decreased Grant Total 11799 7749 19548 8359 11189 by 610 6 2.3 Statistics on the Institution and Disposition of Cases during the year 2009. Statement Showing Institutions, Disposal and Pendency of Cases at Lahore (From 1‐1‐2009 to 31‐12‐2009) PETITIONS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Petition 2850 2845 5695 2856 2839 Criminal Petition 603 1462 2065 1410 655 Civil Review Petition 73 127 200 144 56 Criminal Review 23 82 105 57 48 Petition/Crl.O.P. Jail Petition & Jail 20 141 161 82 79 Shariat Petition Total 3569 4657 8226 4549 3677 APPEALS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Appeal 3 939 942 368 574 Criminal Appeal 0 385 385 154 231 Total 3 1324 1327 522 805 OTHERS MATTERS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil. & Criminal. 0 236 236 236 0 Misc. Application Civil Crl.M.Appeals 0 118 118 118 0 /C.U.O. Suo Motu Cases/ 0 22 22 22 H.R.Cases Total 0 376 354 376 0 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR LAHORE Balance as on Balance as on Description Institution Total Disposal Remarks 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Increased by Petitions 3569 4657 8226 4549 3677 108 Increased by Appeals 3 1324 1327 522 805 802 Others Matters 0 376 354 376 0 Increased by 0 Increased by Grant Total 3572 5981 9907 5447 4482 910 7 2.4 Statistics on the Institution and Disposition of Cases during the year 2009. Statement Showing Institutions, Disposal and Pendency of Cases at Karachi (From 1‐1‐2009 to 31‐12‐2009) PETITIONS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Petition 159 910 1069 828 241 Criminal Petition 50 138 188 167 21 Civil Review Petition 40 57 97 59 38 Criminal Review Petition 7 6 13 9 4 /Crl.O.P. Jail Petition 10 181 191 191 0 Constitution Petition 1 0 1 1 0 Total 267 1292 1559 1255 304 APPEALS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Appeal 103 292 395 180 215 Criminal Appeal 2 71 73 64 9 Total 105 363 468 244 224 OTHERS MATTERS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civ. & Crl. Misc. 9 51 60 56 4 Application Civil/Crl.M.Appeals 0 5 5 5 0 /Crl.R.S.M.R/Crl.S.M.J.R.P. H.R.C/S.M.C 29 15 44 24 20 Grand Total 38 71 109 85 24 8 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR KARACHI Balance as on Balance as on Description Institution Total Disposal Remarks 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Increased by Petitions 267 1292 1559 1255 304 37 Increased by Appeals 105 363 468 244 224 119 Others Increased by Matters 29 71 100 85 15 14 Increased by Grant Total 401 1726 2127 1584 543 142 9 2.5 Statistics on the Institution and Disposition of Cases during the year 2009. Statement Showing Institutions, Disposal and Pendency of Cases at Peshawar (From 1‐1‐2009 to 31‐12‐2009) PETITIONS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civil Petition 1278 714 1992 651 1341 Criminal Petition 301 187 488 195 293 Civil Review Petition 15 11 26 13 13 Criminal Review Petition 3 3 6 1 5 /Crl.O.P. Jail Petition/Jail Sh. 2 8 10 4 6 Petition Total 1597 923 2512 864 1652 APPEALS Opening Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal Balance 31.12.2009 Civil Appeal 38 213 251 90 161 Criminal Appeal 2 65 67 9 58 Total 40 278 318 99 219 OTHERS MATTERS Balance as on Balance as on Description Institutions Total Disposal 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Civ. & Crl. Misc. 0 49 49 49 0 Application Civil/Crl.M.Appeals 0 0 0 0 0 /C.U.O. Human Rights Case 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 49 49 49 0 10 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR PESHAWAR Balance as on Balance as on Description Institution Total Disposal Remarks 31‐12‐2008 31.12.2009 Increased Petitions 1597 923 2512 864 1652 by 55 Increased Appeals 40 278 318 99 219 by 179 Increased Others by 0 Matters 0 49 49 49 0 Increased Grant Total 1637 1201 2830 963 1871 by 234 11 2.6 Statistics on the Institution and Disposition of Cases during the year 2009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pakistan Was Suspended by President General Musharaff in March Last Year Leading to a Worldwide Uproar Against This Act
    A Coup against Judicial Independence . Special issue of the CJEI Report (February, 2008) ustice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, the twentieth Chief Justice of Pakistan was suspended by President General Musharaff in March last year leading to a worldwide uproar against this act. However, by a landmark order J handed down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Chaudhry was reinstated. We at the CJEI were delighted and hoped that this would put an end to the ugly confrontation between the judiciary and the executive. However our happiness was short lived. On November 3, 2007, President General Musharaff suspended the constitution and declared a state of emergency. Soon the Pakistan army entered the Supreme Court premises removing Justice Chaudhry and other judges. The Constitution was also suspended and was replaced with a “Provisional Constitutional Order” enabling the Executive to sack Chief Justice Chaudhry, and other judges who refused to swear allegiance to this extra­constitutional order. Ever since then, the judiciary in Pakistan has been plunged into turmoil and Justice Chaudhry along with dozens of other Justices has been held incommunicado in their homes. Any onslaught on judicial independence is a matter of grave concern to all more so to the legal and judicial fraternity in countries that are wedded to the rule of law. In the absence of an independent judiciary, human rights and constitutional guarantees become meaningless; the situation capable of jeopardising even the long term developmental goals of a country. As observed by Viscount Bryce, “If the lamp of justice goes out in darkness, how great is the darkness.” This is really true of Pakistan which is presently going through testing times.
    [Show full text]
  • Pld 2017 Sc 70)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed Mr. Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016 (Panama Papers Scandal) Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi Petitioner versus Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of Pakistan / Member National Assembly, Prime Minister’s House, Islamabad and nine others Respondents For the petitioner: Syed Naeem Bokhari, ASC Mr. Sikandar Bashir Mohmad, ASC Mr. Fawad Hussain Ch., ASC Mr. Faisal Fareed Hussain, ASC Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR with the petitioner in person Assisted by: Mr. Yousaf Anjum, Advocate Mr. Kashif Siddiqui, Advocate Mr. Imad Khan, Advocate Mr. Akbar Hussain, Advocate Barrister Maleeka Bokhari, Advocate Ms. Iman Shahid, Advocate, For respondent No. 1: Mr. Makhdoom Ali Khan, Sr. ASC Mr. Khurram M. Hashmi, ASC Mr. Feisal Naqvi, ASC Assisted by: Mr. Saad Hashmi, Advocate Mr. Sarmad Hani, Advocate Mr. Mustafa Mirza, Advocate For the National Mr. Qamar Zaman Chaudhry, Accountability Bureau Chairman, National Accountability (respondent No. 2): Bureau in person Mr. Waqas Qadeer Dar, Prosecutor- Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016, 2 Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 & Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2017 General Accountability Mr. Arshad Qayyum, Special Prosecutor Accountability Syed Ali Imran, Special Prosecutor Accountability Mr. Farid-ul-Hasan Ch., Special Prosecutor Accountability For the Federation of Mr. Ashtar Ausaf Ali, Attorney-General Pakistan for Pakistan (respondents No. 3 & Mr. Nayyar Abbas Rizvi, Additional 4): Attorney-General for Pakistan Mr. Gulfam Hameed, Deputy Solicitor, Ministry of Law & Justice Assisted by: Barrister Asad Rahim Khan Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • PAKISTAN COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    PAKISTAN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service 7 June 2012 PAKISTAN 7 JUNE 2012 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN PAKISTAN FROM 25 MAY TO 7 JUNE 2012 Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON PAKISTAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 25 MAY AND 7 JUNE 2012 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.09 Telecommunications ............................................................................................ 1.10 Public holidays ..................................................................................................... 1.13 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: OCTOBER 2011 TO APRIL 2012 .......................................... 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION .......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 6.01 Federal legislature ................................................................................................ 6.05 Provincial
    [Show full text]
  • Sod Country Report Pakistan 2010
    Mid-Term Assessment of the Quality of Democracy in Pakistan March 25, 2008 - September 24, 2010 Mid-Term Assessment of the Quality of Democracy in Pakistan March 25, 2008 - September 24, 2010 MID-TERM ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY IN PAKISTAN REPORT March 25, 2008 - September 24, 2010 PILDAT is an independent, non-partisan and not-for-profit indigenous research and training institution with the mission to strengthen democracy and democratic institutions in Pakistan. PILDAT is a registered non-profit entity under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860, Pakistan. Copyright ©Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development And Transparency - PILDAT All Rights Reserved Printed in Pakistan Published: September 2010 ISBN: 978-969-558-182-7 Any part of this publication can be used or cited with a clear reference to PILDAT. Supported by Head Office: No. 7, 9th Avenue, F-8/1, Islamabad, Pakistan Registered Office: 172-M DHA, Lahore, Pakistan Tel: (+92-51) 111-123-345; Fax: (+92-51) 226-3078 E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.pildat.org MID-TERM ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY IN PAKISTAN REPORT March 25, 2008 - September 24, 2010 CONTENTS Abbreviations & Acronyms Preface Executive Summary The Context 13 1. Rule of Law, Rights and Citizenship 17 1.1. Nationhood and Citizenship 17 1.2. Rule of Law and Access to Justice 22 1.3. Civil and Political Rights 28 1.4. Economic and Social Rights 31 2. Representative and Accountable Government 37 2.1. Free and Fair Elections 37 2.2. The Democratic Role of Political Parties 43 2.3. Effective and Responsive Government 47 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa Mr. Justice Mushir Alam Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan Criminal Appeals No. 210 and 211 of 2015 (Against the judgment dated 09.03.2015 passed by the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad in Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 2011 and Capital Sentence Reference No. 01 of 2011) Malik Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri (in Criminal Appeal No. 210 of 2015) The State (in Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2015) … Appellants versus The State, etc. (in Criminal Appeal No. 210 of 2015) Malik Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri (in Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2015) … Respondents For the appellants: Mian Nazir Akhtar, ASC Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, ASC Mr. Ghulam Mustafa, ASC (in Criminal Appeal No. 210 of 2015) Mian Abdul Rauf, Advocate-General, Islamabad (in Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2015) For the respondents: Mian Abdul Rauf, Advocate-General, Islamabad (in Criminal Appeal No. 210 of 2015) Mian Nazir Akhtar, ASC Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, ASC Mr. Ghulam Mustafa, ASC (in Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2015) Dates of hearing: 05.10.2015, 06.10.2015 & 07.10.2015 Criminal Appeals No. 210 and 211 of 2015 2 JUDGMENT Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J.: Almighty Allah has ordained in the Holy Qur’an that upon receipt of a news or information the men of faith ought to ascertain correctness of such news or information before they may act upon the same and that harm may be avoided if such news or information is got investigated in the first place. The following verses of the Holy Qur’an are relevant in this regard: Surah Al-Hujurat: verse 6 “O you who have faith! If a profligate [person] should bring you some news, verify it, lest you should visit [harm] on some people out of ignorance, and then become regretful for what you have done.” Surah An-Nisa: verse 94 “O you who have faith! When you issue forth in the way of Allah, try to ascertain: do not say to someone who offers you peace, ‘you are not a believer’, seeking the transitory wares of the life of this world.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Sufi Council: Redefining the Islamic Republic of Pakistan Through a Discourse on Sufism After 9/11
    The National Sufi Council: Redefining the Islamic Republic of Pakistan through a discourse on Sufism after 9/11 Teresa Ann Drage Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Religion and Society Research Centre University of Western Sydney March 2015 Dedication I dedicate this to my dad who passed away during the writing of this thesis. Stop the words now. Open the window in the centre of your chest, and let the spirits fly in and out. Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī (interpreted by Coleman Barks) Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Julia Day Howell, Dr Jan Ali, and Associate Professor Emilian Kavalski. I am particularly indebted to Julie who not only read through numerous draft chapters and provided valuable guidance and encouragement, but who offered her unwavering patience and support throughout the entire thesis journey. I would like to thank the Religion and Society Research Centre (formerly the Centre for the Study of Contemporary Muslim Societies), University of Western Sydney, for making the research financially possible. I would also like to express my gratitude at having been able to be part of such a stimulating research environment. A sincere thank you to Professor Adam Possamai and Eva Garcia, and to the staff and fellow postgraduate students at the centre. A very special thank you to John Taylor who not only encouraged me to take the first step on the thesis journey, but who walked the path with me from beginning to end. He shared the joys and sorrows, the defeats and successes, and through it all was a constant source of enthusiasm, inspiration, and motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Activism in Pakistan in Commercial and Constitutional Matters
    Journal of International Criminal Justice Research Volume 1 – July, 2014 Judicial activism in Pakistan in commercial and constitutional matters: Let justice be done though the heavens fall1 Muhammad Raheem Awan University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Pakistan has been experiencing unprecedented wave of judicial activism since 2006. The expansion within constitutional fundamental rights has broadened the scope of public interest litigation “PIL” in almost every sphere of life. Frequent exercise of judicial powers by the Supreme Court of Pakistan “SCP” more specifically “SuoMoto” (action on court’s own motion) jurisdiction2 is seen to be over taking all kind of matters e.g. political, social, economic and foreign direct investment “FDI”. The Apex Court of the country has handed down several judgments under suo moto jurisdiction within the last one decade on matters ranging from insignificant issues such as: prices of daily commodities such as sugar, oil, gas as well as crimes’ investigation to the disqualification of Prime Minister. Moreover the SCP annulled the constitutional amendments, statutory provisions and commercial deals involving billions of dollars FDI. Proceedings and verdicts in such cases would have their long-lasting implications within certain areas of law for which these judgments are handed down. This paper’s prime focus examines the likely outcomes of judicial activism in the political and constitutional arena of Pakistan. Exercise of Suo Moto as a routine matter raises serious questions regarding its constitutionality, effectiveness, desirability as well as sanctity of treaties and agreements executed by successive Pakistani governments. In addressing these issues this paper examines the philosophy of judicial activism; its origin, scope of PIL in expansion of fundamental rights, Suo Moto and other constitutional powers of the SCP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dominance of Pakistan Army in Governance of Pakistan and the Impact on Indo-Pak Relations
    THE DOMINANCE OF PAKISTAN ARMY IN GOVERNANCE OF PAKISTAN AND THE IMPACT ON INDO-PAK RELATIONS A Dissertation submitted to the Panjab University, Chandigarh for the award of Master of Philosophy in Social Sciences, in Partial Fulfilment of the requirement for the Advanced Professional Programme in Public Administration (APPPA) By Candidate Name: Brig DG Misra (Roll No. 4614) Under the guidance of Supervisor Name: Prof. Amit Kumar Singh 46th ADVANCED PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (2020-21) INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NEW DELHI 1 Acknowledgement Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my guide Prof. Amit Kumar Singh for the continuous support, generous guidance, patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge for conducting this study in a very short period of time. His guidance helped me during all the research and writing of this dissertation. I could not have imagined having a better guide and mentor for my M. Phil dissertation. I would also like to thank the IIPA as an institute for giving me this opportunity to choose a very relevant subject and providing the much-needed infrastructural facilities to complete the work. I want to thank the IIPA library staff for the kind cooperation and making the required books available. I am grateful to all the experts for giving very valuable comments during the research proposal presentations which have helped me a lot in conducting this research work. I would like to thank the Course Coordinator of 46th APPPA, Dr. (Prof.) Charru Malhotra for creating a very conducive and pleasant environment throughout the course, and also showing a very considerate attitude regarding timelines of various assignments especially the dissertation work.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judgment of December 2009
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) Present Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ. Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Mr. Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan Mr. Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday Mr. Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani Mr. Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk Mr. Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed Mr. Justice Ch. Ijaz Ahmed Mr. Justice Muhammad Sair Ali Mr. Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain Mr. Justice Rahmat Hussain Jafferi Mr. Justice Tariq Parvez Mr. Justice Ghulam Rabbani CONSTITUTION PETITION NOS. 76 TO 80 OF 2007 & 59/2009, AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1094 OF 2009 (On appeal from the order dated 15.1.2009 passed by High Court of Sindh at Karachi in Const.P.No.355 of 2008) AND HRC NOS.14328-P TO 14331-P & 15082-P OF 2009 Dr. Mobashir Hassan (Const.P.76/07) Roedad Khan (Const. P.77/07) Qazi Hussain Ahmad (Const.P.78/07) Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif (Const.P.79/07) Muhammad Tariq Asad (Const.P.80/07) Syed Feroz Shah Gillani (Const.P.59/09) Fazal Ahmad Jat (C.A.1094/09) Shaukat Ali (H.R.C.14328-P/09) Doraiz (H.R.C.14329-P/09) Zulqarnain Shahzad (H.R.C.14330-P/09) Abid Hussain (H.R.C.14331-P/09) Manzoor Ahmad (H.R.C.15082-P/09) … … … Petitioners. Const.P.76/2007, etc. 2 Versus Federation of Pakistan, etc. … … Respondents. For the petitioners : Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, Sr. ASC. Mr. Salman Akram Raja, ASC.
    [Show full text]
  • SALT 2008 Awards Dinner Program
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Meetings & Events Society of American Law Teachers Archive 1-5-2008 SALT 2008 Awards Dinner Program Society of American Law Teachers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/saltarchive_events Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Society of American Law Teachers, "SALT 2008 Awards Dinner Program" (2008). Meetings & Events. 1. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/saltarchive_events/1 This Event Program is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN LAW TEACHERS Annual Awards Dinner JANUARY 5, 2008 NEW YORK CITY, NY SOCIETY OF AMERICAN LAW TEACHERS A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESSIVE LAW TEACHERS WORKING FOR JUSTICE, DIVERSITY AND ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE "Over the past 30 years, SALT's impact on issues of access, diversity and justice within our profession has been enormous. I'd hate to contemplate the face of tthe academy without it." -Derrick A. Bell, Jr. First conceived in 1972. the Society of American Law Teachers has grown to the largest membership organization of law professors, librarians. and legal education administrators in the country. SALT has sustained an activist agenda to make the legal profession more inclusive. enhance the quality of legal education and extend the power oflaw to underserved individuals and co111111u1iities. SAL T's programs. projects and activities
    [Show full text]
  • PAKISTAN COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    PAKISTAN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service 7 December 2012 PAKISTAN 7 DECEMBER 2012 Contents Preface REPORTS ON PAKISTAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 17 NOVEMBER AND 6 DECEMBER 2012 Useful news sources for further information Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.09 Telecommunications ............................................................................................ 1.10 Public holidays ..................................................................................................... 1.13 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: MAY 2012 TO NOVEMBER 2012 .......................................... 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION .......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 6.01 Federal legislature ................................................................................................ 6.05 Provincial governments ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ju Udicial L Stati 2 Stics O 2010 of Pak Kistan N
    Judicial Statistics of Pakistan 2010 National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee Published by Secretariat of Law & Justice Commission of Pakistan, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad. www.ljcp.gov.pk Contents Sr.No. Page Number 1 Foreword 1 2 Supreme Court of Pakistan 3 2.1 Statement showing list of judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan 5 2.2 Statement showing the name of Branch Registries, institution, total 5 cases, disposal and balance as on 31‐12‐2010 2.3 Statement showing the name of Branch Registries, institution, total 6 cases, disposal and balance as on 31‐12‐2010 2.4 Statement showing the name of Branch Registries, institution, total 6 cases, disposal and balance as on 31‐12‐2010 2.5 Consolidated statement showing previous balance as on 1‐1‐2010, 6 institution, total cases, disposal and balance as on 31‐12‐2010 2.6 Statement showing list of officers of Supreme Court of Pakistan 7 2.7. Statement showing the position of allocated budget by the Finance 11 Division during the current financial year, 2010‐2011 2.8. Statement showing the actual expenditure up‐to 31.12.2010 for the 12 current financial year, 2010‐2011 3. Federal Shariat Court 15 3.1. Statement showing the list of Hon’able Judges of Federal Shariat 17 Court of Pakistan, Islamabad. 3.2. Statement showing case category, previous pendency, institution, total cases, disposal and balance of the Federal Shariat Court, 17 Islamabad. 3.3. Consolidated statement showing previous pendency, institution, total 18 cases, disposal and balance for the year 2010. 3.4.
    [Show full text]