DOCSLIB.ORG

Acting Returning Officers Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acting Returning Officers Report London Borough of Croydon review of polling districts and polling places 2019 (Acting) Returning Officer’s report on existing arrangements and recommendations for changes 1 Contents Contact information Page 2 1. Introduction Page 3 2. Scope of the review Page 3 3. Methodology Page 4 4. Review timetable Page 4 5. Making representations Page 4 6. Summary of report and recommendations Page 5 Appendix 1- Current Polling Districts in by Parliamentary Page 9 Constituency Appendix 2 - Addiscombe East Ward Page 13 Appendix 3 - Addiscombe West Ward Page 15 Appendix 4 - Bensham Manor Ward Page 17 Appendix 5 - Broad Green Ward Page 19 Appendix 6 - Coulsdon Town Ward Page 21 Appendix 7 - Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood Ward Page 24 Appendix 8 - Fairfield Ward Page 27 Appendix 9 - Kenley Ward Page 30 Appendix 10 - New Addington North Ward Page 33 Appendix 11 - New Addington South Ward Page 35 Appendix 12 - Norbury and Pollards Hill Ward Page 37 Appendix 13 - Norbury Park Ward Page 39 Appendix 14 - Old Coulsdon Ward Page 41 Appendix 15 - Park Hill and Whitgift Ward Page 44 Appendix 16 - Purley Oakes and Riddlesdown Ward Page 46 Appendix 17 - Purley and Woodcote Ward Page 49 Appendix 18 - Sanderstead Ward Page 51 Appendix 19 - Selhurst Ward Page 53 Appendix 20 - Selsdon and Addington Village Ward Page 55 Appendix 21 - Selsdon Vale and Forestdale Ward Page 57 Appendix 22 - Shirley North Ward Page 59 Appendix 23 - Shirley South Ward Page 61 Appendix 24 - South Croydon Ward Page 63 Appendix 25 - South Norwood Ward Page 65 Appendix 26 - Thornton Heath Ward Page 68 Appendix 27 - Waddon Ward Page 70 Appendix 28 - West Thornton Ward Page 73 Appendix 29 - Woodside Ward Page 75 Contact information Information on who can make representations and where to address representations is given on page 4. Should you wish to speak to someone about this review or want further information please contact: Seth Alker, Head of Electoral Services Croydon Council Town Hall, Katharine Street Croydon CR9 1DE Telephone: 020 8604 7469 Email: [email protected] or visit www.croydon.gov.uk/pollingreview 2 1. Introduction The Representation of the People Act 1983 and the Electoral Administration Act 2013 require each local authority to undertake periodic compulsory reviews of polling districts and polling places for UK Parliamentary elections. In accordance with these Acts, the next review must be completed by 31 January 2020. The last compulsory review took place in 2014-15. There was a non-statutory review of polling districts and polling places in 2017 prior to the introduction of new local government wards in February 2018. Prior to this review an audit of all the existing polling places was conducted. The audit examined the suitability of the polling places relating to their facilities and access for all voters including disabled voters. As part of this review, the (Acting) Returning Officer must submit comments on existing arrangements and proposals for the future. This report constitutes the Croydon Council’s initial proposals for future arrangements. Jo Negrini, the Chief Executive of Croydon Council is the (Acting) Returning Officer for the Croydon Central, Croydon North and Croydon South parliamentary constituencies. A consultation period will run from 5 August 2019 – 2 September 2019 2. Scope of this review Polling districts and polling places are fixed by the local authority, in this case Croydon Council. Polling districts are geographical areas created by sub-dividing the Croydon electoral area into smaller parts for voting. Each polling district must be allocated a polling place which is a building or area in which the polling stations will be situated. A “polling station” is a desk in the polling place at which ballot papers are issued. The number of polling stations at each polling place will be determined by the Returning Officer in advance of any election and will vary according to the size of the eligible electorate at that election and the likely turnout. This review is regarding the polling districts used at parliamentary elections and will be subdivisions of the Croydon Central, Croydon North and Croydon South parliamentary constituencies. However these polling districts will also be used at Local Government elections and any future referendums. Therefore polling district boundaries will not cross existing Local Government Ward Boundaries. This review of polling districts and polling places will not affect Parliamentary Constituency or Local Government Ward boundaries. 3 3. Methodology The principles underlying Croydon’s approach to polling districts and polling places are: To retain, as far as possible, the current network of polling places and polling districts for the majority of electors to minimise disruption to voters. To ensure that, in line with Electoral Commission’s guidelines, no more than 2,500 electors are allocated to each polling station. To ensure, as far as practicable, that polling places are accessible to people with disabilities. The pattern of provision will never be ideal or suit all electors, but the current boundaries and places were drawn to try and maximise convenience to electors by using the best locations available. 4. Review timetable 5 August 2019 Publication of the Notice of Review Publication of the (Acting) Returning Officer’s Report on the existing arrangements and proposals for the future Start of the Consultation period 2 September 2019 End of the Consultation period 16 October 2019 Final Report on the Review for approval by Full Council. 01 December 2019 Publication of revised electoral register. Any changes to existing arrangements take effect. 5. Making representations Electors may make representations to Croydon Council regarding the review and the content of this report. Croydon Council would also welcome any person or body with expertise in access for persons with any type of disability, to make a representation or comment on the content of this report. Persons or bodies making representations should, if possible, propose alternative places that may be used as polling places. The consultation period will run from Monday 5 August until Monday 2 September 2019. Maps showing the existing polling district boundaries are included in appendices 2-29 below. They show the current polling district boundaries and polling places. These came into force in February 2018 and were used at the Local Government elections in May 2018 and at the European Parliamentary election in May 2019. A map of all the existing polling districts is also available on Croydon Council’s website: www.croydon.gov.uk/pollingreview 4 Information and documents regarding the review can be obtained from: Seth Alker, Head of Electoral Services Croydon Council Town Hall Katharine Street Croydon CR9 1DE www.croydon.gov.uk/pollingreview Representations should be made in writing to the above address, or emailed to [email protected] Croydon Council Officers will investigate any representations. Final recommendations, taking into account the (Acting) Returning Officer’s comments and representations made during the Consultation period, will be made in a report to the Full Council on 16 October 2019. Full Council will be asked to consider and approve the recommendations. Any changes to the existing polling district boundaries agreed by Full Council will be incorporated into the electoral register published on 1 December 2019. Should a General election or Referendum take place in the autumn of 2019, the publication of the electoral register and any changes had as a result of this review will be delayed to February 2020. 6. Summary of report and recommendations For ease of reference, the current arrangements and recommendations for future arrangements are reviewed by Local Government Ward. The Polling Districts in each Parliamentary Constituency are listed in Appendix 1 below. A detailed assessment of each Ward and the recommendations for them can be found in Appendices 2 – 29 below. This includes maps showing the existing polling district boundaries and polling places and electorate figures (as at June 2019). The summary of the recommendations are as follows. Addiscombe East Ward Polling place for polling district ADE3 changed to the Public Library, Ashburton Learning Village. No other changes are recommended. See Appendix 2 for more information. Addiscombe West Ward No change to current arrangements are recommended. See Appendix 3 for more information. Bensham Manor Ward No change to current arrangements are recommended. See Appendix 4 for more information. 5 Broad Green Ward No change to current arrangements are recommended. See Appendix 5 for more information. Coulsdon Town Ward No change to current arrangements are recommended. See Appendix 6 for more information. Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood Ward Amend the electoral register to move the addresses on Beulah Hill from CPU5 to CPU4 polling district. No other changes are recommended. See Appendix 7 for more information. Fairfield Ward Split the existing polling district FFD2 down the centre of Wellesley Road. All properties east of the new boundary to remain in FFD2 polling district. All properties west of the new boundary to be part of a new FFD6 polling district. The polling place for the amended FFD2 polling district would be located at a new venue on the east side of Wellesley Road. This could be Bedford Hall, 72-74 Wellesley Rd, Croydon CR0 2AR or another suitable alternative in the district. The polling place for the new FFD6 polling district to be located at St Michael`s Parish Church Hall, Poplar Walk, Croydon, CR0 1UA (currently polling place for FFD2). Following completion of renovation work, The Tamworth Hub to be assessed for its suitability as a polling place for polling district FFD1. See Appendix 8 for more information. Kenley Ward Move the streets in KLY1 polling district that are located at the top of the hill from KLY1 Polling District to KLY4 Polling District so that the electors can vote at Hayes Primary School, Hayes Lane which is located a little further along the ridge of the hill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land at Purley Baptist Church, 1 Russell Hill Road, 1-4 Russell Hill
    Rob Pearson Our ref: APP/L5240/V/17/3174139 Director Your ref: Nexus Planning Ltd Riverside House 2a Southwark Bridge Road London SE1 9HA 9 July 2020 By email only: [email protected] Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 APPLICATION MADE BY THORNSETT GROUP AND PURLEY BAPTIST CHURCH LAND AT PURLEY BAPTIST CHURCH, 1 RUSSELL HILL ROAD, 1-4 RUSSELL HILL PARADE, 2-12 BRIGHTON ROAD, PURLEY HALL AND 1-9 BANSTEAD ROAD, PURLEY APPLICATION REF: 16/02994/P 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Paul Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry between 3 and 6 December 2019 into your client’s full phased application for planning permission for the demolition of existing buildings on two sites; erection of a 3 to 17 storey development on the ‘Island Site’ (Purley Baptist Church, 1 Russell Hill Road, 1-4 Russell Hill Parade, 2-12 Brighton Road), comprising 114 residential units, community and church space and a retail unit; and a 3 to 8 storey development on the ‘South Site’ (1-9 Banstead Road) comprising 106 residential units and any associated landscaping and works, in accordance with application ref: 16/02994/P, dated 20 May 2016. 2. On 12 April 2017, the Secretary of State directed, in pursuance of Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that your client’s application be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the local planning authority.
    [Show full text]
  • CHASE Residents' Association
    CHASE Residents’ Association Via: www.chaseresidents.org.uk CHASE Residents’ Association submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on proposed changes to ward boundaries within the London Borough of Croydon We wish to draw the Commission’s attention to difficulties that would be posed by putting into practice draft recommendations for changes to ward boundaries within the Addiscombe area of Croydon Central. We propose an alternative re-drawing of boundaries, a position we believe is in keeping with the views of a number of neighbouring residents’ associations and individuals. Established communities The notional boundaries of the “community” of Addiscombe are distinct from the present electoral ward of Addiscombe in that the community includes a sizeable part of the present Ashburton Ward. Addiscombe Road forms the southern boundary, in both electoral and community terms, for both wards. Residents of Fairfield Ward to the south do not identify with the community of Addiscombe. Within the current electoral wards of Addiscombe and Ashburton there is a more distinct community-based division between: • The western end, where residents living near East Croydon Station gravitate towards shops, schools, churches and facilities in the area between Cherry Orchard Road and Clyde Road. • The eastern side, where the Lower Addiscombe Road is the main district centre serving a community extending from east of Ashburton Park to Elgin Road to the west. Difficulties presented by the proposed boundaries Creating the proposed new wards of Addiscombe West & Park Hill and Addiscombe East by imposing an arbitrary border between Addiscombe/Ashburton and extending these wards south of Addiscombe Road would include areas with no natural affinity with Addiscombe.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling District and Polling Places Review 2011 Final Report of the Returning Officer
    Appendix A Polling District and Polling Places Review 2011 Final Report of the Returning Officer This report sets out for consideration by the Council the Returning Officer’s arrangements for polling districts and polling places within the London Borough of Croydon. The review has been conducted according to the requirements of the Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 that came into force on 1 January 2007. The consultation period lasted from 1 September until 23 September 2011. All submissions were considered and appear in this final report. The Polling District Review Task Group, consisting of four members of the Council, considered and reviewed the Returning Officer’s proposals. The methodology followed in producing the proposals was as follows: • That the Returning Officer’s median figure for the initial review of 1,750 projected polling station voters per polling district formed the basis of the recommendations within this report • That, in line with Electoral Commission guidelines, there will no more than 2,500 electors allocated to each polling station • That electors will be distributed equally amongst all polling districts in the Ward, where practicable • That accessibility requirements will be accounted for when allocating polling places • That local disability groups will be consulted as part of the review • Polling district boundaries could be changed but not the Ward boundaries Other considerations: • There are many new developments in the process of being built. Those
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Schedule TR2-58329-Ssa-SL-1-1
    Schedule TR2-59565-sSa-SL-1-1 Schedule information Route: TR2 No. of vehicles used on 25 schedule: Service change: 59565 - SCHEDULE, STRUCTURAL Implementation date: 28 August 2021 Day type: sSa - Special Saturday Operator: SL - ARRIVA LONDON SOUTH Option: 1 Version: 1 Schedule comment: Option comment: TRAMLINK RAIL REPLACEMENT SERVICE Timing points Timing point Transit node Stop ADDSAP Addiscombe, Ashburton Park HJ08 ASHBURTON PARK 17338 Ashburton Park ADDSAP Addiscombe, Ashburton Park HJ08 ASHBURTON PARK 17339 Ashburton Park ADDSTS Addiscombe, Tramstop HJ15 BINGHAM ROAD 17342 Addiscombe Tram Stop ADDSTS Addiscombe, Tramstop HJ15 BINGHAM ROAD 17343 Addiscombe Tram Stop ARNTRM Arena Tram Stop HJ10 LONG LANE BYWOOD AVENUE 18799 Arena Tram Stop ARNTRM Arena Tram Stop HJ10 LONG LANE BYWOOD AVENUE R0746 Arena Tram Stop BECKJS Beckenham Junction Station FJ07 BECKENHAM JUNCTION STN TRS169 Beckenham Junction BECKJS Beckenham Junction Station FJ07 BECKENHAM JUNCTION STN TRS174 Beckenham Junction BECKRD Beckenham Road FP01 BECKENHAM R MACKENZIE RD 19768 Beckenham Road Tram Stop BECKRD Beckenham Road FP01 BECKENHAM R MACKENZIE RD 19769 Beckenham Road Tram Stop BIRKSN Birkbeck Station FP02 BIRKBECK STATION 17413 Birkbeck Station BIRKSN Birkbeck Station FP02 BIRKBECK STATION 17414 Birkbeck Station CROYCO Croydon, Cherry Orchard Road HC25 E CROYDON CHERRY ORCH RD 17348 Addiscombe Road CROYCO Croydon, Cherry Orchard Road HC25 E CROYDON CHERRY ORCH RD 26842 Cherry Orchard Rd / East Croydon Stn CROYPR Croydon, Parkview Road HJ14 ADDISCOMBE BLACK HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Representing, Supporting and Working with the Local Residents for a Better Community Page 1 of 21
    To: Case Officer – Mr Nathan Pearce From: Development Environment Monks Orchard Residents’ Association Development Management Planning 6th Floor Bernard Weatherill House 8 Mint Walk Croydon CR0 1EA Email: [email protected] 8 May 2019 [email protected] Emails: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Reference: 19/01761/FUL Application Received: Fri 12 Apr 2019 Application Validated: Fri 12 Apr 2019 Address: Pegasus Fairhaven Avenue Croydon CR0 7RX Proposal: Demolition of existing dwelling and erection of a 3- storey block containing 3 x 3-bedroom Houses and 6 x 2- bedroom Apartments with associated access, 9 parking spaces, cycle storage and refuse store. Consultation Close: Fri 17 May 2019 Target Date: Fri 07 Jun 2019 Case Officer: Nathan Pearce Dear Mr Pearce The Monks Orchard Residents’ Association (MORA) represents 3,879 residential households in the Shirley North Ward of the London Borough of Croydon. We are a registered Residents’ Association with Croydon Council Local Planning Authority (LPA). On behalf of our members and local residents we object to the above-mentioned planning application development proposal on the following grounds. We understand the need for additional housing but take the view that new housing developments must meet the current and emerging planning policies to ensure future occupants have acceptable living standards for the life of the development and that proposed developments respect the character of the area for which it is destined. Also, that proposed developments have the appropriate Housing and Residential Densities which are supported by the current and proposed local Public Transport and other public service Infrastructure to support the additional future occupants of the proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by the Caterham Flood Action Group (FLO0013)
    Written evidence submitted by The Caterham flood Action Group (FLO0013) Introduction We, the Caterham Flood Action Group (FLAG), represent flood victims of Caterham on the Hill, Chaldon and Old Coulsdon, where 121 homes (of the 350 at risk) suffered terribly in the devastating floods of June 2016. We are affiliated to the National Flood Forum (NFF) and hold regular Multi-agency Meetings (MAM) with the Risk Management Authorities (those being, Surrey County Council (SCC - as LLFA), Tandridge District Council (TDC - as LPA), the London Borough of Croydon (LBC - as LLFA & LPA), Thames Water, The Environment Agency and City of London Corporation). Our most recent virtual MAM took place on 24th April ‘20. Our goal to find a long-term solution to this man-made flood risk. Our Catchment falls within steep sided valleys, decades of cumulative overdevelopment, non-maintenance of the surface water drainage infrastructure, no investment/upgrade of the foul drainage infrastructure to suit development, population growth or climate change and failure to manage the flood risk, simply means that when it rains, we’re at risk of foul flooding… in the 21st century and it’s absolutely disgusting. We have participated in many consultations on all things flood related and to be perfectly honest, they are getting rather repetitive. “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results”. The Pitt review came up with the solutions many years ago, why then are we still debating this issue? https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69489/2012- 01-31-pb13705-pitt-review-progress.pdf And if all but two of the recommendations (92 in total) were taken forward (in 2012), why are we no closer to managing the flood risk in this country? For the record, the Caterham FLAG are participating in the collaborative learning project, commissioned by the Environment Agency, undertaken by Icarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Croydon South Labour Party April 2017
    Introduction Croydon South Constituency Labour Party provides below suggested improvements to the draft recommendations on new local authority ward boundaries as they apply to the Croydon South parliamentary constituency. Proposed alterations are given letters A to L and the locations are also marked for the convenience of the Commission on the overview map of the newly proposed wards and on maps of the predecessor wards that are impacted by changes suggested below. Coulsdon Town/Purley & Woodcote All of that part of Stoats Nest Road (A) that is between the Brighton Road and the Railway Bridge better lies within the Coulsdon Town ward as addresses here are in the postal district of Coulsdon and have a CR5 post code. We feel that the residents here would believe that they live in Coulsdon and not in Kenley nor in Purley. This would mean that all of Stoats Nest Road would be in the same ward. This impacts upon 15 properties and 22 electors. Coulsdon Town/Old Coulsdon To strengthen the connection to the Coulsdon Woods and Hillers Heath Road consideration might be given to including both sides of Petersfield Crescent (B) in Coulsdon Town ward this having an impact on only three properties and six electors. Aldercroft (C) sits much better within Coulsdon Town ward as Aldercroft is a continuation of Deepfield Way with Rutherwick Rise a more clearly delineating boundary between Coulsdon Town and Old Coulsdon. This affects 29 properties and approximately 41 electors. It might well make good sense to include all of Ullswater Crescent (D) in one ward and thus to move the far end of this industrial estate into the Coulsdon Town ward.
    [Show full text]
  • Phil Thomas Page 1 of 5 02/06/2016
    Page 1 of 5 Phil Thomas From: "Chris Philp MP" <[email protected]> Date: 17 May 2016 12:47 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Update from Chris Philp MP on Southern Rail, Coulsdon parking, Purley Re-cycling Centre and other issues Dear All I am continuing to work hard on local and national issues as Croydon South’s MP and this email contains updates on some local issues you may find of interest. I have also held 15 street stalls on Saturday mornings on high streets around the constituency in the past 8 months and met with hundreds of local residents. The first item below is about the appalling service offered by Southern Rail. I am hosting a public meeting with them on 24 th May – please do come along if you can. Please also forward this email to any friends, family and neighbours who may be interested. Southern Rail Public Meeting Southern Rail has been one of the biggest issues facing our neighbourhood for some time. The constant delays have plighted commuters and leisure travellers alike. I have been complaining to Ministers, Southern and Network Rail and it is now time for residents to get a chance to hear from the train companies directly. To this end, I am hosting a public meeting on 24 th May at 7.30pm at Purley United Reform Church (in the hall). This is at 906 Brighton Road, Purley CR8 2LN, next to the hospital. There is no parking on site, so people driving are advised to use the multi-storey or the pay & display hospital car park.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission by Thornton Heath Labour Party and the Thornton
    Submission by Thornton Heath Labour Party and the Thornton Heath Neighbourhood Association to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England regarding the electoral wards review for the London Borough of Croydon 2016-2017 This submission concentrates on the present and proposed boundaries of the Thornton Heath ward in north Croydon and explains why the existing boundaries should be largely retained as being those that best define the local community, and why some other submissions should be rejected as unsound and divisive. The Current Thornton Heath ward with polling districts The existing ward boundaries have remained fairly constant for a great many years, since long before this became a ward division of the London Borough of Croydon in the 1965 local elections. Only minor adjustments occurred along the northern part of the boundary following the 1998 boundary review and this was necessitated by the deletion of the small Beulah Ward that adjoined that boundary. There are alternative proposals, notably by the Croydon Labour Group (which will no doubt become the official Council submission) which seek to annexe most of the Thornton Heath High Street and adding it into a renamed version of Bensham Manor ward and also pushing the ward boundaries north and away from its historic and recognised community area. This submission strongly opposes that proposal. The table above is the Council’s calculations for the 2016 and 2022 electorate after calculating population growth and taking into account predicted residential developments. The Council’s own calculations state that the overall electorate will increase from: 264,126 in 2016 to 281,944 in 2022 The average electorate per councillor will increase from: 3,773 in 2016 to 4,028 in 2022 In particular the Thornton Heath electorate will increase from: 11,238 in 2016 to 11,635 in 2022 A variance of -1% in 2016 to a variance of – 4% in 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes 404 and 434 Consultation Report
    Proposed changes to routes 404 and 434 Consultation Report November 2019 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Summary of main issues raised during consultation ................................................ 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Detailed description of proposals ................................................................... 7 2. About the consultation ...................................................................................... 11 2.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Potential outcomes ....................................................................................... 11 2.3 Who we consulted ........................................................................................ 11 2.4 Dates and duration ....................................................................................... 12 2.6 What we asked ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the London Borough of Croydon Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the London Borough of Croydon electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from residents in Croydon. The submissions from have been collated into one document. They have been sorted alphabetically, by surname. (L-Q) Maureen 2 Levy Colin Hart 1 Anthony 1 Harris Graham 1 Bass Simon Hoar 1 Anne Giles 1 Andy 1 Stranack Margaret 1 Bird Mario 2 Creatura Tim Pollard 2 Brian 1 Longman and Phil Thomas Scott Roche 1 Amy Pollard 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Gareth 1 Streeter Graeme 1 Fillmore Jonathan 1 Cope Lara Fish 1 Luke 1 Springthorpe Mark 1 Johnson Samir 1 Dwesar Sylvia 1 Macdonald Sarah Davis 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Alasdair 1 Stewart Badsha 1 Quadir Chris Philp 1 Chris Wright 1 Croydon 1 Conservativ e Group Dudley 1 Mead Fredeic 1 Demay Gavin 1 Barwell Helen 1 Pollard Jason 1 Cummings Lianne 1 Bruney Luke Clancy 1 Lynne Hale 1 Mario 2 Creatura Michael 1 Neal Mike Fisher 1 Richard 1 Chatterjee Robert 1 Sleeman Sara 1 Bashford Simon Brew 1 Sue Bennett 1 Tim Pollard 2 Yvette 1 Hopley Adam 1 O'Neill Adrian 1 Dennis Andrew 1 Frazer Ann Willard 1 Anthony 1 Sandford Catherine 1 Saunders Cheryl Purle 1 Christopher 1 King Croydon 1 South Labour Party David 1 Cantrell Deirdre Lea 1 Dennis King 1 Derek Lea 1 Diane 1 Hearne Elizabeth 1 Agyepong Fenella 1 Cardwell Gisela 1 James Janet 1 Stollery Jill Kilsby 1 Joseph 1 Rowe Kate Liffen 1 London 1 Borough of Croydon Maggie 2 Jackson Maggie 2 Jackson Martin 1 Wheatley Matthew 1 Taylor Michael 1 Bevington Paul Scott 1 Peter 1 Morgan Phil Reed 1 Philippa 1 Toogood Rita Barfoot 1 Sharon 1 Swaby Sheila 1 Childs Thornton 1 Heath Neighbourho od Association and BLP Toby 1 Keynes While consultation deadlines have prevented many of the organisations from making submissions, they have still taken steps to encourage their local members to respond, highlighting the way the draft recommendations run counter to local identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Addiscombe Road
    WIMBLEDON BROMLEY SYDENHAM THORNTON HEATH BECKENHAM PENGE ELMERS HAYES END WEST WICKHAM CROYDON SHIRLEY PURLEY ADDINGTON NEW ADDINGTON Buses from Addiscombe Road 194 Key Lower Sydenham Sainsbury’s O 24 hour — Connections with London Underground 119 service 367 WIMBLEDON Bromley North o Connections with London Overground Lower Sydenham R Connections with National Rail Bell Green Tramlink 3 T Connections with Tramlink Wimbledon BROMLEY Sydenham Road Bromley Mondays to Saturdays except evenings The Glades Shopping Centre SYDENHAM Dundonald Road Newlands Park THORNTON HEATH Studland Road Bromley South Thornton Heath Penge East Merton Park Tesco Whitehorse 198 Lane St Mary’s Avenue Brigstock 130 BECKENHAM Road Thornton Heath Selhurst Park Penge Clock Tower and Leisure Centre Stadium PENGE Beckenham Route finder Pawleyne Arms Tramlink 2 Shortlands Morden Road Thornton Heath Park Road Junction Pond Day buses including 24-hour services South Norwood Beckenham Grove Hayes Bus route Towards Bus stops Clock Tower Kent House George 24 hour Phipps Bridge service Bromley ABCDEF Oakwood Avenue 119 T Beckenham Road Clock Purley Way PRSTUVW Norwood Junction House Beckenham High Street Belgrave Walk Croydon 130 New Addington MN University Avenue Road Village Thornton Heath JKL Hospital Portland Road Beckenham Way Wat Memorial Harrington Road Hayes 194 Lower Sydenham ABCDEF Mitcham Croydon Road Birkbeck Croydon PRSTUVW South Norwood Elmers End Elmers End Green Leisure Centre Tesco HAYES Shrublands ABCDEF ELMERS Upper Elmers 198 London Road Long Lane Mitcham
    [Show full text]