DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations Development Programme Japan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations Development Programme Japan UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME JAPAN-CARIBBEAN CLIMATE CHANGE PARTNERSHIP (J-CCCP) Final Mid Term Evaluation Report Consultant: Alfredo Caprile December 2017 The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UNDP, its Executive Board or of the Members of the United Nations. This publication only reflects the opinion of the author. i Acknowledgment This report has been prepared by Alfredo Caprile, President of Sustainable Development Advisors S.A.(www.sd-advisors.com.ar) in its capacity as Indepent Consultant. The author would like to express his gratitude to all of the Project participants with whom he has met and interviewed during the Mid-Term evaluation mission in Barbados, St. Lucia and Suriname between the 25th September and 4th of October 2017. The hospitality and gratitude that they have demostrated in providing their opinions with regard to the results and impacts that have been accomplished by the Project to date have been critical for the preparation of this report. In particular, the author would like to thank Yoko Ebisawa, Project Manager and Sherry Frederick, Monitoring and Evaluation Analyst from the Project Management Unit at the UNDP Barbados and OECS Country Office and Kurt Prospere and Sharon Legiman, National Focal Points for St. Lucia and Suriname for their valuable contribution, as well as to the rest of members of the Project Management Unit (Donna Gittens, Neisha Manickchand, Penny Bowen, Karen Drayton and Danielle Alleyne) who have taken time to discuss different aspects of the project implementtion and have provided all of the requested information. The author would also like to thank Chisa Mikami, Deputy Resident Representative of the UNDP Barbados and OECS Country office who participated actively in the design of the J-CCCP Prodoc and Armstrong Alexis, Deputy Resident Representative at the UNDP office in Suriname for sharing theirviews on the progress of the Project, its main achievements and the strategy that has been developed to complete the pending activities. The Evaluator had the support of all the persons that have been interviewed to understand the context in which the Project has been developed, analyze the progress to date of the different activities that have been programmed and elaborate the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. ii Abbreviations and Acronyms AOP Annual Operational Plan APR-PIR Annual Progress Report – Project Implementation Review AWP Annual Work Plan CANARI Caribbean Natural Resources Institute CARDI Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute CARICOM Caribbean Community CARPHA Caribbean Public Health Agency CBO Community Based Organisations CCCCC Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre CDEMA Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency CIMH Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology CO2 Carbon Dioxide CPDCBS Clarendon Parish Development Committee Benevolent Society CSO Community Service Organisation CYEN Caribbean Youth Environmental Network EE Energy Efficient / Energy Efficiency GE Green Economy GEF Global Environment Facility GHG Greenhouse Gases GoJ Government of Japan GWh Giga Watt hour HACT Harmonised Approach to Cash Transfers Ja REEACH Jamaica Rural Economy and Ecosystems Adapting to Climate Change JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency kWh Kilo Watt hour LEDS Low-Emission Development Strategy M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MWh Mega Watt hour NAMAs Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions NAPs National Adaptation Plans NGO Non-governmental organization OECS Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States PMU Project Managment Unit PPP Public private partnership PSC Project Steering Committee QPR Quarterly Project Review RE Renewable Energy RTA Regional Technical Advisor UNDP United Nations Development Programme iii UNDP RBLAC United Nations Development Programme Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean UNDP SRO United Nations Development Programme Sub- Regional Office UNFCCC RCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Regional Collaboration Centre UWI University of West Indies YCCC Youth Climate Change Conference iv Index Acknowledgment ................................................................................................................................ ii Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. iii Index ................................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary........................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Evaluation Objective ........................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Evaluation Methodology ..................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Data collection methods ............................................................................................. 9 1.3 Structure of the MTR report ............................................................................................. 11 2. Project overview and development context............................................................................. 13 2.1 Project Start and Duration ................................................................................................ 13 2.2 Development Context ....................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Problems that the project seeks to address ............................................................. 13 2.2.2 Immediate and development objectives of the J-CCCCP ......................................... 15 2.2.3 Baseline indicators established ................................................................................. 15 2.2.4 Main Stakeholders .................................................................................................... 17 2.2.5 Expected Results ....................................................................................................... 17 3. Analysis of the situation with regard to the outcomes and development results ................... 20 3.1 Relevance .......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1 Project design............................................................................................................ 22 3.2.2 Project implementation ............................................................................................ 24 3.2.3 Project strategy ......................................................................................................... 25 3.2.4 Progress towards the achievement of outcomes and development results ........... 27 3.3 Efficiency ........................................................................................................................... 41 3.4 Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 43 4. Other key findings ..................................................................................................................... 45 4.1 Management arrangements ............................................................................................. 45 4.2 Adaptive management...................................................................................................... 46 4.3 Partnership arrangements ................................................................................................ 48 v 4.4 Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................................... 49 4.5 Gender considerations ...................................................................................................... 50 5. Forward looking analysis and lessons learned .......................................................................... 51 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 54 6.1 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 54 6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 58 Tables Table 1Ratings for Progress Towards Results ................................................................................... 10 Table 2 Progress towards results matrix........................................................................................... 28 Table 3 Synopsis on Dominica communications campaign .............................................................. 38 Table 4 Budget execution through Q3 2017 ..................................................................................... 41 Table 5 Actual expenditures through Q3 2017 + planned expenditures for Q4 2017...................... 42 Table 6 Roles of UNDP offices ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Use of Pesticides in Developing Countries and Their Impact on Health and the Right to Food
    STUDY Requested by the DEVE committee The use of pesticides in developing countries and their impact on health and the right to food Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union EN PE 653.622 - January 2021 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY The use of pesticides in developing countries and their impact on health and the right to food ABSTRACT This study provides a broad perspective on the main trends regarding the use of pesticides in developing countries and their impacts on human health and food security. Information is provided on the challenges of controlling these hazardous substances, along with the extent to which pesticides banned within the European Union (EU) are exported to third countries. The analysis assesses the factors behind the continuation of these exports, along with the rising demand for better controls. Recommendations are intended to improve the ability for all people, including future generations, to have access to healthy food in line with United Nations declarations. These recommendations include collaborating with the Rotterdam Convention to strengthen capacity building programmes and the use of the knowledge base maintained by the Convention; supporting collaboration among developing countries to strengthen pesticide risk regulation; explore options to make regulatory risk data more transparent and accessible; strengthen research and education in alternatives to pesticides; stop all exports of crop protection products banned in the EU; only allow the export of severely restricted pesticides if these are regulated accordingly and used properly in the importing country; and support the re-evaluation of pesticide registrations in developing countries to be in line with FAO/WHO Code of Conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • 9916/21 MR/Hm 1 JAI B Delegations Will Find in the Annex the Above
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 June 2021 (OR. en) 9916/21 CORDROGUE 29 COLAC 44 NOTE From: Presidency To: Delegations No. prev. doc.: WK 5367/2021 REV 2 Subject: EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs - Biennial Report 1 June 2019 - 31 May 2021 Delegations will find in the Annex the above-mentioned biennial report for adoption at the XXIInd High-Level Meeting of the EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs, to be held by videoconference on 22 June 2021. 9916/21 MR/hm 1 JAI B EN ANNEX EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs - Draft Biennial Report 1 June 2019 to 31 May 2021 This report is the result of a regular analysis of the activities carried out in relation to the Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs between the European Union (EU) and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) from 1 June 2019 to 31 May 2021. The information contained in this report is limited to inter-regional programmes and does not contain any information on other EU-funded programmes at regional and bilateral levels in the field of drugs. I. EU-CELAC High-Level Meeting and Technical Committee Meetings The XXIInd High-Level Meeting of the EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs was initially scheduled to take place in Zagreb, Croatia, on 2-3 April 2020, under the co- presidency of Croatia and Mexico. However, due to the COVID-19 crisis, it was postponed to 2021. The EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs therefore plans to hold its XXIInd High-Level Meeting in virtual format on 22 June 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Microplastic Ingestion by a Herring Opisthonema Sp., in the Pacific Coast Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/670679; this version posted June 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Microplastic ingestion by a herring Opisthonema sp., in the Pacific coast of 2 Costa Rica 3 4 Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán1, Crista Alpízar-Villalobos1, Johan Gatgens-García1, Gabriel 5 Jiménez-Huezo1, Marco Rodríguez-Arias1, Helena Molina-Ureña1,2, Javier Villalobos3, Sergio 6 A. Paniagua3, José R. Vega-Baudrit3 & Keilor Rojas-Jimenez1 7 8 1 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501-2060, San Pedro, San José, Costa 9 Rica. 10 2 Centro de investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR) Universidad de Costa 11 Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica. 12 3 Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología LANOTEC-CeNAT-CONARE, 1174-1200, 13 Pavas, San José, Costa Rica. 14 15 Corresponding Author: 16 Keilor Rojas-Jiménez, [email protected], Tel. +506 25115871 17 18 Abstract: Despite there is a growing interest in studying the presence and effects of 19 microplastics (MP) in fishes and other aquatic species, knowledge is still limited in tropical 20 areas. In this study, we examined the presence of MP in the gastrointestinal content of 30 filter 21 feeders of thread herring, Opisthonema complex (Clupeiformes: Clupeidae) from the Central 22 Pacific coast of Costa Rica. We detected the presence of MP in 100% of the individuals with 23 an average of 36.7 pieces per fish, of which 79.5% were fibers and 20.5% particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade and Gender Linkages: an Analysis of Central America
    AMERICA CENTRAL CENTRAL TEACHING MATERIAL ON TRADE AND GENDER VOLUME 1: UNFOLDING THE LINKS MODULE 4D TRADE AND GENDER LINKAGES: AN ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL AMERICA [email protected] http://unctad.org/gender AMERICA CENTRAL CENTRAL TEACHING MATERIAL ON TRADE AND GENDER VOLUME 1: UNFOLDING THE LINKS MODULE 4D TRADE AND GENDER LINKAGES: AN ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL AMERICA Geneva, 2020 © 2020, United Nations All rights reserved worldwide Requests to reproduce excerpts or to photocopy should be addressed to the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licences, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to: United Nations Publications 405 East 42nd Street New York, New York 10017 United States of America Email: [email protected] Website: shop.un.org The designations employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has been edited externally. United Nations publication issued by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD/DITC/2020/2 ISBN: 978-92-1-112996-0 eISBN: 978-92-1-005340-2 Sales no.: E.20.II.D.33 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This module was prepared by Bengi Yanik-Ilhan. Comments and suggestions were provided by Nursel Aydiner-Avsar, Claudia Contreras, Alma Espino, Alicia Frohmann, Katerina Joklova, Mariangela Linoci, Jorge Martinez, Johan Muller, and Simonetta Zarrilli. The module was coordinated and supervised by Simonetta Zarrilli, Chief of the Trade, Gender and Development Programme at UNCTAD.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameter Estimates of the 2016-2017 Zika Outbreak in Costa Rica: an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Approach
    Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 16(4): 2738–2755. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2019136 Received: 01 January 2019 Accepted: 17 March 2019 http://www.aimspress.com/journal/MBE Published: 28 March 2019 Research article Parameter estimates of the 2016-2017 Zika outbreak in Costa Rica: An Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) approach Fabio Sanchez1;∗ , Luis A. Barboza1 and Paola Vasquez´ 2 1 CIMPA-Escuela de Matematica,´ Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose,´ Costa Rica 2 Escuela de Salud Publica,´ Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose,´ Costa Rica * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In Costa Rica, the first known cases of Zika were reported in 2016. We looked at the 2016– 2017 Zika outbreak and explored the transmission dynamics using weekly reported data. A nonlinear differential equation single-outbreak model with sexual transmission, as well as host availability for vector-feeding was used to estimate key parameters, fit the data and compute the basic reproductive number, R0, distribution. Furthermore, a sensitivity and elasticity analysis was computed based on the R0 parameters. Keywords: Zika virus; basic reproductive number; Approximate Bayesian Computation; public health; transmission dynamics; epidemic models; vector-borne diseases 1. Introduction Over the past few decades, arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses), particularly those transmitted by mosquitoes, have emerged and/or reemerged as significant public health problems worldwide [1]. Dif- ferent conditions, such as climate change, globalization, human movement, and the lack of adequate vector control strategies, are among the complex factors, that have influenced the growing burden of arboviral infections around the globe [2]. The present threat that these viruses represent, highlights the importance of a better understanding of its transmission dynamics, in order to provide public health care authorities with evidence that could potentially help in the development of more effective pre- vention and control approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5. II ECCTS Focus Group Report
    APPENDIX 5. Focus Group Report 380 — Focus Group Report — DOL Grant # IL-29677-16-75-K-48 Working Conditions and Health in Central America By Southwest Center for Occupational and Environmental Health The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health For U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL) Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) Office of Economic and Labor Research (OELR) and USDOL Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) Prepared By Silvia González, MS National Autonomous University of Honduras and Jorge Federico Travieso, MS Consultant David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras, MSc, PhD Principal Investigator and Professor George L. Delclos, MD, MPH, PhD Co-investigator and Professor Reviewed and Edited By Emily Q. Ahonen, MSc, PhD Associate Professor Department of Social and Behavioral Health Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana 22 March 2020 381 Acknowledgment and Disclaimer Funding for this project was provided by the United States Department of Labor. This material does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. Additional support was provided through funding from The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health and in-kind contributions from the Universidad Nacional in Heredia, Costa Rica, and the Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Spain. 382 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Page Key Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations 385 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 389 A. INTRODUCTION 390 A.1. Background and purpose 390 A.2. Organizational Chart: Roles and Responsibilities 391 A.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Panorama of Latin America 2018
    2018 Social Panorama of Latin America Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/suscripciones 1 2018 Social Panorama of Latin America Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Laís Abramo Chief, Social Development Division Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division Thanks are owed for the valuable collaboration of Pascual Gerstenfeld, former Chief of the Statistics Division, Mario Castillo of the Division for Gender Affairs, Xavier Mancero, Officer in Charge of the Statistics Division, and Alberto Arenas and Wilson Peres, Regional Advisers. The following worked on the preparation of the chapters of this document: Verónica Amarante, Miguel del Castillo Negrete, Simone Cecchini, Ernesto Espíndola, Álvaro Fuentes, Rodrigo Martínez, Claudia Robles, Daniela Trucco, Iliana Vaca Trigo, Varinia Tromben, Soledad Villafañe and Pablo Villatoro. Ignacio Carrasco, Nicolas Dinerstein, Fabiana del Popolo, Verónica Ortiz, María Jesús Silva, Guillermo Sunkel and Heidi Ullmann prepared substantive inputs; while Amparo Bravo, Miguel del Castillo Negrete, Nicolas Dinerstein, Andrés Espejo, Ernesto Espíndola, Fabiola Fernández, Álvaro Fuentes, Michael Hanni, Carlos Howes, Carlos Kroll, Felipe López, Rocío Miranda, Verónica Ortiz, Ana Catalina Valencia and Daniel Vega worked on the statistical processing. Valuable contributions and comments relating to different sections of the document were received from Fabiana del Popolo, Jürgen Weller and Pablo Yanes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean
    Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020 Fiscal policy amid the crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020 Fiscal policy amid the crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Daniel Titelman Chief, Economic Development Division Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division The Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean is a report prepared each year by the Economic Development Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). The preparation of this year’s report was supervised by Daniel Titelman, Chief of the Division, and Noel Pérez Benítez, Chief of the Division’s Fiscal Affairs Unit. Jean Baptiste Carpentier, María Gil, Michael Hanni, Juan Pablo Jiménez and Noel Pérez Benítez worked on the drafting of the report. Chapter III drew on inputs prepared by Juan Carlos Gómez Sabaini and Dalmiro Morán. Andrea Podestá prepared inputs for chapter IV. Swen Tellier provided research assistance and prepared statistical information. The Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID) assisted with the financing of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • International Retailing Group Project
    COUNTRIES WITHIN CENTRAL AMERICA WORTH INVESTING IN 1 Countries Within Central America Worth Investing In: A closer look within the 8 countries Diosmary Artiles, Jackie Ramos, Jennifer Huerta, Greicy Wong, New York City College Of Technology COUNTRIES WITHIN CENTRAL AMERICA WORTH INVESTING IN 2 Abstract Eight countries make up Central America which consist of Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Panama. Central America is characterized as warm but has a tropical climate. Their tropical climate allows them to have a rich soil allowing them to grow coffee beans, bananas and much more agricultural resources. These eight countries share similar cultures but still have differences within each other to be able to distinguish them apart. The smallest of the countries is El Salvador with a population of 6.345 ​ million (World Bank, 2016), although Belize holds the smallest population with 336,954. Central America consists of countries that are developing which means that majority of them live in poverty and lack health care. Nicaragua is considered to be the least developed while Panama ​ and Costa Rica are more developed. Central America’s largest trade partner is the United States. ​ The Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), was signed on May 28, 2004. It was an expansion of NAFTA to five Central American nations (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, ​ ​ Costa Rica and Nicaragua), and the Dominican Republic (Central America Free Trade Agreement, 2017). They also have a trade agreement with Europe called the Association Agreement which was signed June 29, 2012. Since their is a lot of poverty in the region Central ​ America has a lot of labor intensive countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Iai/Cop/26/16 1 Original
    ORIGINAL: ENGLISH 15 March 2018 CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE INTER-AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH Twenty-sixth meeting Antigua, Guatemala, 20-21 June 2018 Agenda item 16 Report of the Directorate Global Outreach and Cooperation 1. This document has been prepared by the IAI Directorate. Background 2. The preamble of the Agreement establishing the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) states: Concerned that research on global issues requires cooperation among research institutes, among states and among the different parts of the Inter-American region, and with regional and international global change research programs. 3. The Conference of the Parties, at its 22nd meeting (Mexico City, 2014) adopted Decision XXII/4, which states: The CoP decided to make a statement to the UNFCCC CoP-20 to be held in Peru that in addition to mitigation, global change adaptation is important to Latin America and needs to be incorporated into international decision making. Adaptation needs to be based on sound science and technology. IAI/COP/26/16 1 4. In light of the above, a number of activities and efforts were developed and implemented by the IAI Directorate to enhance partnerships with multi-lateral environmental agreements and inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations and are described in this document. Introduction 5. The IAI Directorate gained increased visibility from participation during the inter- sessional period at meetings of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF). 6. In 2017, the Directorate participated for the first time in the 46th Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-46) held from 6 to 10 September in Montreal, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of the Negotiations for the Modernisation of the Trade Part of the Association Agreement with Chile
    Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of the Negotiations for the Modernisation of the Trade Part of the Association Agreement with Chile Inception Report Draft, 29 June 2018 Prepared by BKP Development Research & Consulting [June 2018] The views expressed in the report are those of the consultant, and do not present an official view of the European Commission. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Trade Directorate C — Asia and Latin America Unit C.3 — Latin America Contact: Marta Moya Diaz E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of the Negotiations for the Modernisation of the Trade Part of the Association Agreement with Chile Inception Report Draft, 29 June 2018 The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. Directorate-General for Trade 2018 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Towards FIFCO 2020
    Moving towards FIFCO 2020 INTEGRATED REPORT 2016-2017 FIFCO FIFCO 2 INTEGRATED REPORT 2017 Moving towards FIFCO 2020 INTEGRATED REPORT 2016-2017 FIFCO FIFCO 3 INTEGRATED REPORT 2017 How to read this report GRI 102-45, GRI 102-46, GRI 102-54 This report is available at The company reports on all FIFCO operations This report gives us the opportunity For the fourth consecutive year, our in Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador and to show our shareholders and other www.fifco.com 2017 Annual Report is written under the United States: Cervecería de Costa Rica, stakeholders how the different areas and the Integrated Reporting framework, Florida Retail, Industrias Alimenticias Kern’s are interrelated and interact with each www.fifcosostenible.com following the guidelines established by the (IAK, located in Guatemala), North American other, identifying the multiple ways in International Integrated Reporting Council Breweries (NAB, located in the United States), which the company creates present (IIRC). This report presents the company’s Florida Hospitalidad and Florida Capitales, and future value. At the same time, it economic, social and environmental for the period corresponding to the fiscal year evaluates the company’s contribution performance and provides a summary of between October 2016 and September 2017. to society and the environment at a how FIFCO creates value in financial and Some sections of this report include data from local and regional level, by linking its non-financial terms. El Salvador; however, this does not represent efforts and initiatives with the specific a significant activity for FIFCO since it has only contexts and challenges in which it 10 collaborators and most initiatives don’t operates.
    [Show full text]