DOCSLIB.ORG

Fenix Resources Iron Ridge Biological Survey 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MARCH 2020 FENIX RESOURCES IRON RIDGE BIOLOGICAL SURVEY 2019 This page has been left blank intentionally. Fenix Resources Ltd Iron Ridge Biological Survey Document Status Approved for Issue Rev. Author(s) Reviewer Date Name Distributed To Date Rob Sellers Tim McCabe J Shepherdson 0 Shaun Grein 28/11/2019 S Grein 28/11/2019 Andrew Craigie R Brierley Rob Sellers 1 Shaun Grein 20/02/2020 S Grein J Shepherdson 20/02/2020 Alice O’Connor 20/03/2020 S Grein J Shepherdson 20/03/2020 2 Andrew Craigie Shaun Grein R Brierley ecologia Environment (2020). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of ecologia or Fenix Resources. ecologia Environment 463 Scarborough Beach Rd OSBORNE PARK WA 6017 Phone: 08 6168 7200 Email: [email protected] March 2020 i Fenix Resources Ltd Iron Ridge Biological Survey This page has been left blank intentionally. March 2020 ii Fenix Resources Ltd Iron Ridge Biological Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ecologia Environment (ecologia) was engaged by Fenix Resources Ltd. (Fenix) to conduct a detailed flora and vegetation survey and a Level 1 fauna and fauna habitat assessment, including a targeted survey for the Priority 3 listed Idiosoma clypeatum (northern shield-backed trapdoor spider), and a stygofauna survey to support environmental approvals for the proposed Iron Ridge Project over tenement M20/118 (the ‘study area’) located approximately 55 km northwest of Cue in the Murchison region. The current survey was conducted between the 2nd and 6th September 2019 and expands on a reconnaissance flora and fauna habitat survey conducted by ecologia in July 2019. Flora and Vegetation A total of 171 vascular plant taxa (species, infraspecific taxa, and phrase names) representing 37 families and 93 genera were recorded from 24 sampling sites and additional opportunistic records within the study area. No EPBC Act (1999) or BC Act (2016) listed Threatened species were recorded, however, eight state listed Priority species were recorded, including Acacia dilloniorum (Priority 1), Stenanthemum patens (Priority 1), Hemigenia virescens (Priority 3), Micromyrtus placoides (Priority 3), Prostanthera petrophila (Priority 3), Acacia speckii (Priority 4), Dodonaea amplisemina (Priority 4), and Grevillea inconspicua (Priority 4). Of these species, A. dilloniorum, S. patens, M. placoides, P. petrophila, A. speckii, and D. amplisemina have been recorded from the proposed infrastructure development envelope. Three introduced plant species were recorded from the study area: Cuscuta planifolia, Lysimachia arvensis, and Rostraria pumila. No Weeds of National Significance (WONS) or Declared Pests were recorded. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using floristic data collected from 24 sampling sites surveyed within the study area. Based on this analysis, ten vegetation types were described and delineated. None of the vegetation types were assessed as corresponding to any National or State listed TEC, nor were any considered to be regionally significant based on available data. However, most vegetation types are associated with the Priority 1 PEC ‘Weld Range vegetation complexes (banded ironstone formation)’, the spatial extent of which is defined by the DBCA and includes a 500 m administrative buffer. Within the study area, 263.80 ha of vegetation occurs within the DBCA defined PEC boundary, of which 78.4 ha is within the proposed project infrastructure envelope, representing 0.3% of the total extent of the PEC. Five vegetation types may also be considered locally significant on the basis of supporting populations of Priority 1 listed species, having high overall species diversity, or being locally restricted. Vegetation condition across most of the study area was assessed as Very Good to Excellent, with no or minimal weed invasion in most areas and only minor grazing impacts. Vertebrate Fauna A Level 1 vertebrate fauna and fauna habitat assessment of the study area, including targeted searches for conservation significant fauna, was undertaken concurrently with detailed flora and vegetation survey. Fauna habitat assessments were undertaken at 12 sites to obtain representative examples of fauna habitats present. Four broad fauna habitats were identified, described and mapped within the study area. Habitats were generally assessed to be in Very Good to Excellent condition. The landforms, land systems and habitat types identified during the survey are considered locally common and the survey did not identify any restricted conservation significant vertebrate fauna habitat, or habitats that were restricted to the survey area itself. Acacia sp. Weld Range (A. Markey & S. Dillon 2994) and Acacia speckii dominated shrubland on mid and lower slopes provides suitable habitat for the Priority 3 (BC Act) northern shield-backed trapdoor spider (Idiosoma clypeatum) while mulga (Acacia aneura) woodland over ironstone ridge crests and slopes provides suitable habitat for the Priority 4 (BC Act) long-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis March 2020 iii Fenix Resources Ltd Iron Ridge Biological Survey longicauda). The thick leaf litter associated with the minor drainage line supporting dense shrubs habitat provides shelter for the Priority 1 (BC Act) west coast mulga slider (Lerista eupoda). Fifteen vertebrate fauna species were recorded during the survey including 13 bird, one mammal and one reptile species. These represent the potential vertebrate fauna of the survey area; however, species other than those recorded are likely to occur. Five northern shield-backed trapdoor spider (Idiosoma clypeatum (Priority 3 BC Act)) burrows were recorded within the Acacia sp. Weld Range (A. Markey & S. Dillon 2994) and Acacia speckii shrubland on mid and lower slopes habitat type under acacias that exhibit narrow phyllodes. The Iron Ridge study area only contains a small area of suitable habitat (4.29% of the total study area) for this species. Survey effort within suitable habitat for this species was considered adequate. Previous survey within the Weld Range have recorded the long-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis longicauda (Priority 4 (BC Act)) which has been given a likelihood of occurrence rating of ‘Likely (1)’ within the mulga woodland over ironstone ridge crests and slopes habitat type. The peregrine falcon has also been recorded on multiple occasion within the Weld Range and has been given a likelihood of occurrence rating of ‘Likely (1)’. This species may overfly all habitat types without utilising any part of the study area in particular. Seventeen species of conservation significance were deemed unlikely to occur due to the lack of suitable habitat including four species of mammal, 12 birds and one reptile. March 2020 iv Fenix Resources Ltd Iron Ridge Biological Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. III 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................1 1.2 SURVEY OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................1 1.3 LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................1 2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 DESKTOP STUDY ........................................................................................................................4 2.2 FLORA AND VEGETATION ..........................................................................................................5 2.3 VERTEBRATE FAUNA .................................................................................................................8 2.4 ANIMAL ETHICS ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.5 STUDY TEAM AND LICENCES .................................................................................................. 11 2.6 LIMITATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS .......................................................................................... 12 3 DESKTOP STUDY ............................................................................................................ 14 3.1 CLIMATE ................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 IBRA 7 BIOGEOGRAPHIC SUBREGIONS .................................................................................. 14 3.3 LAND SYSTEMS, GEOLOGY, AND SOILS .................................................................................. 15 3.4 CONSERVATION RESERVES AND NATIONALLY IMPORTANT WETLANDS .............................. 16 3.5 FLORA AND VEGETATION ....................................................................................................... 21 3.6 SIGNIFICANT ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES ............................................................................ 29 3.7 OTHER SIGNIFICANT ECOSYSTEMS ........................................................................................ 30 3.8 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Repeated Climate-Linked Host Shifts Have Promoted Diversification in a Temperate Clade of Leaf-Mining Flies

    Repeated Climate-Linked Host Shifts Have Promoted Diversification in a Temperate Clade of Leaf-Mining Flies

    Repeated climate-linked host shifts have promoted SPECIAL FEATURE diversification in a temperate clade of leaf-mining flies Isaac S. Winklera,b,1, Charles Mitterb, and Sonja J. Schefferc aDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613; bDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742; and cSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Plant Science Institute, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Building 003, Room 231, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705 Edited by Anurag A. Agrawal, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and accepted by the Editorial Board July 30, 2009 (received for review May 1, 2009) A central but little-tested prediction of ‘‘escape and radiation’’ ever, there is still little evidence on the degree to which changes coevolution is that colonization of novel, chemically defended host in either plant defense or insect ‘‘offense’’ promote diversifica- plant clades accelerates insect herbivore diversification. That the- tion (7). Progress on the insect side has come from several recent ory, in turn, exemplifies one side of a broader debate about the reports plausibly attributing an instance of significantly elevated relative influence on clade dynamics of intrinsic (biotic) vs. extrinsic insect diversity to a co-occurring shift to a new host taxon (5, 10, (physical-environmental) forces. Here, we use a fossil-calibrated 11). Any single instance of elevated diversification, however, molecular chronogram to compare the effects of a major biotic could reflect other influences that happen to be confounded factor (repeated shift to a chemically divergent host plant clade) with the host shift.
  • Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

    Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

    Our ref: EEN18041.003 Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street West Perth WA 6005 T +61 8 9211 1111 Date: 04 June 2019 Tanya McColgan Bellevue Gold Limited Suite 3, Level 3, 24 Outram Street WEST PERTH WA 6008 Dear Tanya, Flora and vegetation values identified within PoW 79431 In response to your request for the preliminary results of the detailed flora and vegetation assessment undertaken over the Bellevue Gold Project area, RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (RPS) herein provides a summary of the key results and outcomes of the assessment in lieu of the final report which is due in July. Background Bellevue Gold Ltd (Bellevue Gold) is currently undertaking an exploration drilling program within mining tenement M3625 for the Bellevue Gold Project (the Project). The Project is located in the north-eastern Goldfields; approximately 40 km north of the township of Leinster in the Shire of Leonora. The Project is situated on and surrounded by pastoral lands and is located on Yakabindie cattle station. RPS was commissioned by Bellevue Gold to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation assessment over M3625 and part of M3624 to encompass the area where exploration drilling is currently underway and including the potential mining and associated infrastructure footprint (the proposed development area). The survey area, the proposed development area and the PoW 79431 area are shown in Figure A. RPS understands that the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) have requested additional information regarding the natural values of the PoW area, where in-fill drilling is proposed, in order to adequately assess the PoW application.
  • Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-In-Confidence

    Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-In-Confidence

    AECOM SKA Ecological Assessment A Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Conservation Categories G:\60327857 - SKA EcologicalSurvey\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\Ecological Assessment\60327857-SKA Ecological Report_Rev0.docx Revision 0 – 28-Nov-2014 Prepared for – Department of Industry – ABN: 74 599 608 295 AECOM SKA Ecological Assessment A-1 Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Conservation Categories G:\60327857 - SKA EcologicalSurvey\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\Ecological Assessment\60327857-SKA Ecological Report_Rev0.docx Revision 0 – 28-Nov-2014 Prepared for – Department of Industry – ABN: 74 599 608 295 Definitions of Threatened and Priority Flora Species 1 Appendix A – Conservation Categories 1.1 Western Australia Plants and animals that are considered threatened and need to be specially protected because they are under identifiable threat of extinction are listed under the Wildlife Conservation Act (WC Act). These categories are defined in Table 1. Any species identified as Threatened under the WC Act is assigned a threat category using the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List categories and criteria. Species that have not yet been adequately surveyed to warrant being listed under Schedule 1 or 2 are added to the Priority Flora or Fauna Lists under Priority 1, 2 or 3. Species that are adequately known, are rare but not threatened, or meet criteria for Near Threatened, or that have been recently removed from the threatened list for other than taxonomic reasons, are placed in Priority 4 and require regular monitoring. Conservation Dependent species and ecological communities are placed in Priority 5.
  • List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry

    List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry

    List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry The following are a list of attachments associated with the Yaringa Works Approval – Attachment 1-Yaringa Quarry Vertices co-ordinates – Attachment 2-Yaringa Quarry Proposed Premises Map – Attachment 3A-Yaringa Quarry Estimated road building production program – Attachment 3B-Yaringa Clearing Area – Attachment 3-Key Plant and Equipment Nov 2016 – Attachment 3-Process Flowchart – Attachment 3-Proposed layout of machinery on site (approximate may change depending on site requirements and conditions) – Attachment 3-Yaringa Stockpile Layout Plan – Attachment 7-Nearest sensitive receiver from project area – Attachment 7-Siting and location Yaringa Quarry – Attachment 7-Yaringa Quarry Proximity to Hamelin Pool and Shark Bay – Attachment 10-Fee Calculator Outputs – Attachment 11-Yaringa Quarry PEIA and EMP – Biological Survey Page 1 of 1 Vertices Longitude Latitude 0 114.31174 -25.9992 1 114.31171 -25.9996 2 114.30988 -25.9995 3 114.30854 -25.9994 4 114.30905 -25.9983 5 114.31068 -26.0005 6 114.31068 -26.0025 7 114.30816 -26.0024 8 114.30814 -26.0002 9 114.30866 -26.0016 10 114.30932 -26.0016 11 114.3093 -26.002 12 114.30869 -26.0019 13 114.31456 -25.9999 14 114.31539 -26.0008 15 114.31516 -26.0009 16 114.31469 -26.0006 17 114.3144 -26.0003 18 114.31409 -26.0001 19 114.31384 -26.0011 20 114.31349 -26.0011 21 114.31216 -25.9998 22 114.31432 -25.9987 23 114.31541 -25.9983 24 114.31723 -25.9988 25 114.31651 -26.0004 26 114.30813 -26.0002 27 114.31724 -26.0007 28 114.31656 -26.0008 29 114.31579 -26.0012 30 114.31539
  • Volume 5 Pt 3

    Volume 5 Pt 3

    Conservation Science W. Aust. 7 (2) : 363–376 (2009) Flora and vegetation of the banded iron formation of the Yilgarn Craton: Robinson Ranges and Mount Gould RACHEL MEISSNER1, GAYNOR OWEN1 & BEN BAYLISS1,2 1 Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia, 6946. Email: [email protected] 2 Avon Natural Diversity Alliance (ANDA), Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104,Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983. ABSTRACT A quadrat based study of the flora and vegetation of the Robinson Ranges and Mount Gould, found 170 taxa including 1 weed taxon. Two priority taxa were recorded and two new taxa identified. Fifty quadrats were established to cover the major geographical, geomorphologic and floristic variation across the hills. Data from 49 of these quadrats were used to define seven community types. Differences in communities were strongly correlated with soil chemistry, elevation, amount of exposed bedrock, surficial rock size and slope. Several communities had restricted distributions. None the plant communities of Robinson Range or Mount Gould are currently in the secure conservation estate. INTRODUCTION by cyclonic activity off the Pilbara coast of Western Australia. Cyclones that cross the coast dissipate and The Robinson Ranges is located in the southern part of develop into rain bearing depressions which may bring the Gascoyne bioregion on the northern edge of the rain into the centre of the state. In addition, thunderstorms Yilgarn Craton. The ranges extend over 200 km, beginning may develop from convectional activity (Curry et al. 1994). near the Great Northern Highway, 140 km north of Winter rainfall is often the result of cold frontal activity Meekatharra, and extending west to Mount Padbury.
  • Charles Darwin Reserve

    Charles Darwin Reserve

    CHARLES DARWIN RESERVE (WHITE WELLS STATION) WESTERN AUSTRALIA FIELD HERBARIUM Volunteers of the Bushland Plant Survey Project Wildflower Society of Western Australia (Inc.) PO Box 519 Floreat WA 6014 for Bush Heritage Australia July 2010 This project was supported by the Wildflower Society of Western Australia Support was also provided by the WA Department of Environment and Conservation NOTE: This Field Herbarium is to remain the property of Bush Heritage, in so long as the Reserve is managed sympathetically with the bushland, and the owners are able to care for the Herbarium so it does not deteriorate. In the event these criteria cannot be met the Field Herbarium is to be handed over to the Geraldton Regional Herbarium. For further information contact the WA Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983 Phone (08) 9334 0500. Charles Darwin Reserve (White Wells Station), Western Australia – Field Herbarium CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................... 1 Map 1 Wildflower Society of WA survey sites at Charles Darwin Reserve - August 2008 .......................... 2 Map 2 Wildflower Society of WA survey sites at Charles Darwin Reserve – October 2008 ........................ 3 2 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 THE FIELD HERBARIUM ..........................................................................................................................
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report

    Clearing Permit Decision Report

    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 6760/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: HBJ Minerals Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Mining Lease 25/357 Local Government Area: City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder Colloquial name: Cannon Gold Project 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 40 Mechanical Removal Mineral Exploration, Mineral Production and Associated Activities 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 12 November 2015 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description Beard vegetation associations have been mapped for the whole of Western Australia. One Beard vegetation association has been mapped within the application area (GIS Database): Beard vegetation association 468: Medium woodland, salmon gum and goldfields blackbutt. A level one flora and vegetation study incorporating a desktop assessment and a field component was undertaken in August 2015 by Botanica Consulting (2015). This survey identified ten broad vegetation types within the study area: Eucalypt Woodland CLP-EW1: Low woodland of Eucalyptus salmonophloia over heath of Eremophila scoparia and dwarf scrub of Atriplex vesicaria / Sclerolaena diacantha; CLP-EW2: Forest of Eucalyptus lesouefii over low scrub of Eremophila scoparia and dwarf scrub of Cratystylis conocephala ; CLP-EW3: Low
  • Acacia Thoma Maslin

    Acacia Thoma Maslin

    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia thoma Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin See illustration. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Acacia thoma occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au).
  • Acacia Mulganeura Maslin & J.E.Reid

    Acacia Mulganeura Maslin & J.E.Reid

    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia mulganeura Maslin & J.E.Reid Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver.
  • Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012

    Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012

    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Material Source Area: Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012 This Report: has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and may only be used and relied on by MRWA for the purpose agreed between GHD and MRWA as set out in section 1.3 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by MRWA and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the Report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.” The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on information obtained from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points.
  • Flora and Vegetation Assessment Part 7.Pdf

    Flora and Vegetation Assessment Part 7.Pdf

    0 2km Scale 1:125 000 MGA94 (Zone 51) dgn ~ Imagery: Landgte (2011) LEGEND Species of Interest Study Area Disturbance Footprint Mount Keith Satellite Wanjarri Nature Reserve Tenements (G. Cockerton & P. Goodman WB38116) Surface Water Author: Western Botanical Date: December 2017 Drawn: CAD Resources ~ Tel 9246 3242 URL www.cadresources.com.au December 2017 A4 Rev: B Ref g2414_R02_04_SOI_OX. Addendum to Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Study Area, March 2017 Appendix 4: Vegetation Community Descriptions and Quadrat Data BHP Billiton, Nickel West Pty Ltd Report Ref: WB867 WB867 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Operations Study Area June 2017 Appendix 4a: Vegetation Community Descriptions for the Mt Keith Satellite (MKS) Study Area. Addendum to Western Botanical (2017) Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Proposal Study Area March 2017. Consultants report to BHP Billiton, Nickel West. Report reference WB867. a 1 WB867 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Study Area June 2017 Appendix 4 Contents Definitions ............................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 4a. Vegetation Community Descriptions .............................................. 5 Appendix 4b. Quadrat & Releve Site Summaries ................................................. 43 2 a WB867 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Operations Study Area June 2017 Definitions Sclerophyll Shrublands are those which are dominated or characterised by plants with hard, drought tolerant, non-succulent foliage. They include common genera such as Acacia, Senna, Sida and Eremophila varieties that make up the bulk of the flora and vegetation of the Yakabindie tenements. These species are generally not salt tolerant, however may demonstrate tolerances to a wide variety of soil types with corresponding range of inferred geochemistry.
  • Index Seminum 2018-2019

    Index Seminum 2018-2019

    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II ORTO BOTANICO INDEX SEMINUM 2018-2019 In copertina / Cover “La Terrazza Carolina del Real Orto Botanico” Dedicata alla Regina Maria Carolina Bonaparte da Gioacchino Murat, Re di Napoli dal 1808 al 1815 (Photo S. Gaudino, 2018) 2 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II ORTO BOTANICO INDEX SEMINUM 2018 - 2019 SPORAE ET SEMINA QUAE HORTUS BOTANICUS NEAPOLITANUS PRO MUTUA COMMUTATIONE OFFERT 3 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II ORTO BOTANICO ebgconsortiumindexseminum2018-2019 IPEN member ➢ CarpoSpermaTeca / Index-Seminum E- mail: [email protected] - Tel. +39/81/2533922 Via Foria, 223 - 80139 NAPOLI - ITALY http://www.ortobotanico.unina.it/OBN4/6_index/index.htm 4 Sommario / Contents Prefazione / Foreword 7 Dati geografici e climatici / Geographical and climatic data 9 Note / Notices 11 Mappa dell’Orto Botanico di Napoli / Botanical Garden map 13 Legenda dei codici e delle abbreviazioni / Key to signs and abbreviations 14 Index Seminum / Seed list: Felci / Ferns 15 Gimnosperme / Gymnosperms 18 Angiosperme / Angiosperms 21 Desiderata e condizioni di spedizione / Agreement and desiderata 55 Bibliografia e Ringraziamenti / Bibliography and Acknowledgements 57 5 INDEX SEMINUM UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II ORTO BOTANICO Prof. PAOLO CAPUTO Horti Praefectus Dr. MANUELA DE MATTEIS TORTORA Seminum curator STEFANO GAUDINO Seminum collector 6 Prefazione / Foreword L'ORTO BOTANICO dell'Università ha lo scopo di introdurre, curare e conservare specie vegetali da diffondere e proteggere,