<<

Lecture 10 African Sleeping Sickness and Antigenic Variation

Antigenic Variation

 The entire trypanosome population seems antigenically uniform but at a very low frequency divergent (so called switched) serotypes are encountered

 The switch to a new serotype is not recognized by the host population

 “Switchers” survive & proliferate leading to a new wave of parasitemia

 Serotype switching continues Antigenic Variation

1 Antigenic Variation

 T. brucei is covered with a dense surface coat

 Variant specific antisera strongly react with surface coat

 Surface coats from different clones are antigenically distinct

Antigenic Variation

No protease treatment

 Trypsin (or other protease) treatment completely removes the surface coat from T. brucei

 This treatment also abolishes antibody binding

 This suggested that the antigenic determinant on the surface is made of

+ protease treatment

2 Surface coat consists of a single glycoprotein

 65 kDa glycoprotein

 C-terminus anchored in the membrane (GPI-anchor)

 Only in the N-terminal 1/3 are exposed

 Constant and variable regions

 VSG forms dimers

 VSGs from different clonal variants have same molecular weight, but different amino acid composition

 Different VSG share only 16% amino acid similarity, but yet adopt a nearly identical tertiary structure!

Variant Surface Glycoprotein

• Single VSG type uniformly covers surface of parasite (107 copies) • VSG forms 12-15 nm electron dense surface coat • VSG dimers form a densly packed surface coat

3 Variant Surface Glycoprotein

Variable region

Constant region

 Different VSG share only 16% similarity, but yet adopt a nearly identical tertiary structure!

T. brucei life cycle

non-dividing fuel=? Dividing form mVSG coat fuel=glucose mito=? VSG coat mito=“off”

Dividing form fuel=amino acids non-dividing Procyclin coat fuel=glucose mito=“on” VSG coat mito=“low”

4 T. brucei has ~ 1000 different VSG

 Great variability of size among isolates

 11 diploid megabase , intermediate size, and about 100 minichromosomes - all classes contain VSG genes

 6-10% of the total DNA codes for VSGs (~1000 genes)

 Only a single VSG is expressed at a time!

 At a low frequency a switch to a different occurs, the host developed against the previous VSG so Genome organization the new clonal cell line is strongly selected. 11 Megabase chromosomes (1-6 Mbp) 1-7 Intermediate chromosomes (200-700 kbp) ~100 Minichromosomes (50-150 kbp)

VSG Antigenic Variation

Immune VSG destruction switch by host Proliferation

 What is the advantage to expressing a single VSG?

 What mechanisms can you think of that could control gene expression and protein abundance?

 How is VSG expression controlled?

5 Genomic Location of VSGs

The VSG Expression Site

 Long polycistronic transcript  Approximately 20-40 Bloodstream expression sites (BES) in the genome  Active VSG genes are always at the “ends” of the chromosomes ()

6 VSG in Minichromosomes

 VSG genes at minichromosome telmomers

 Switching via conversion or reciprocal telomere exchange

Mechanisms of Switching

7 Creation of Mosaic VSGs

VSG switching

 Transposition of VSG genes occurs by intra- or intermolecular recombination

 This explains switching but not really why one gene is active and all the others are silent

8 Expression Sites

Regulation could be achieved by modification of

JJJJJ JJJJ active VSG

JJJJJ J J J J JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ X inactive VSG

The hyper-modified Base J

β-glucosyl-hydroxy-methyluracil a T variant

Base J But is J a chicken or an egg?

Expression Site Body (ESB)

 How is a single expression site activated? LOCATION!

 Differential localization of RNA polymerase I

 rRNA transcription in other eukaryotes by RNA Pol I

 usually RNA Pol II transcribes coding sequences

 Localizes to nucleolus in PF and BSF

Procyclic Bloodstream  Extranulcleolar in BSF

9 Expression Site Body (ESB)

Procyclic

Bloodstream

Red: anti-fibrillarin - nucleolus marker Green: anti-RNA Pol I

The additional spot of RNA Pol I localization is NOT the nucleolus

Expression Site Body (ESB)

Active 221ES

Inactive 121ES

Active, not inactive VSG expression sites co-localize with the extranuclear Pol I spot.

GFP shows the position of the respective VSG genes in the nucleus

10 Transcriptional analysis of expression sites

 Transcription of ES sites during development

 Initiation occurs in several sites, but is abortive

 Only in an active ES site is RNA elongation productive

 Hypothesis: there is a limited supply of factors (transcription) connecting Pol I polymerase to elongation/processing machinery

 Hypothesis: these factors are located in the ESB

Antigenic Variation Key Points

 General features of Antigenic Variation (non-viral) Requires a family of variant sruface genes Requires a mechanism to express only one gene at a time Requires a mechanism to switch genes

 Trypanosomes - ~2000 VGS genes (variant surface glycoprotein)

 Expression occurs out of telomeric expression sites (ES) (tapes/tape recorder or CDs/ CD player)

 Expression seems promoter independent

 To switch genes on, they are transposed into an active expression site by several mechanisms

 Expression seems to be controlled by a physical association of ES with a single RNA Pol I transcription particle (location) per nucleus

11 Subnuclear location of Pol I

Navarro Model

12 Taking a Tryp(anosome) Across the Blood-Brain Barrier - Part 1 Review by Masocha et al 2007 Phys & Behav 92:110-114

Endothelium

Major structural elements

Data acquired from animal models - experimental infections with T. brucei brucei Laminin α5

Taking a Tryp(anosome) Across the Blood-Brain Barrier - Part 1 Masocha et al 2004 J. Clin Invest 114:689-694

Endothelial Laminin membrane Trypanosome

Parenchymal membrane

Laminin α4 Laminin α5

13 In vitro BBB Model

Taking a Tryp(anosome) Across the Blood-Brain Barrier - Part 2 Grab et al 2004 J. Parasitol 90:970-979.

Data acquired from in vitro BBB tissue culture models: T. brucei gambiensi

Laminin α4 Laminin α5

14 Taking a Tryp(anosome) Across the Blood-Brain Barrier - Part 2

Grab et al 2004 J. Parasitol 90:970-979.

15