DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rescue Boat Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rescue Boat Code The Rescue Boat Code The Code of Practice for Open Rescue Boats of Less than 15 Metres in Length Vessel Standards Branch Maritime and Coastguard Agency Bay 2/30 Spring Place 105 Commercial Road Southampton SO15 1EG Tel : +44 (0) 23 8032 9139 Fax : +44 (0) 23 8032 9104 e-mail: [email protected] General Inquiries: [email protected] MCA Website Address: www.dft.gov.uk/mca File Ref: MS183/001/023 Published: March 2013 © Crown Copyright 2013 Safer Lives, Safer Ships, Cleaner Seas Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this Code. THE RESCUE BOAT CODE THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR OPEN RESCUE BOATS OF LESS THAN 15 METRES IN LENGTH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Foreword 2. Definitions 3. Application and Interpretation 3.1 Application 3.2 Applicability of other codes of practice, standards and legislation 3.3 Certification and Audit 3.4 Compliance 3.5 Areas of Operation 3.6 Management 3.7 Training 3.8 Standard Operating Procedures and Incident Action Plans 3.9 Emergency Procedures 3.10 Maintenance Requirements 3.11 Record of Services 4. Construction and Structural Strength 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Operational and Design Limits 4.3 General Requirements 4.4 Boat Construction and Structural Strength 4.5 Construction and Structural Strength: Rigid Hull Boats and boats fitted with a buoyant collar 4.6 Construction and Structural Strength: Inflatable boats and Rigid Inflatable Boats 4.7 Recesses 4.8 Fixings 5. Weathertight Integrity 5.1 Openings 5.2 Skin Fittings 5.3 Ventilation 6. Water Freeing Arrangements 7. Machinery 7.1 Propulsion: General Requirements 7.2 Engine Stop Cords 7.3 Inboard Engines 7.4 Outboard Engines 7.5 Emergency Propulsion 7.6 Engine Cooling Systems 7.7 Exhaust Systems 7.8 Fuel 8. Electrical Arrangements 8.1 General Requirements 8.2 Batteries 8.3 Cables 8.4 Electrical Protection 8.5 Switches 8.6 Earthing and Lightning Protection 8.7 Electrical Spaces 8.8 Lighting 9. Steering and Propeller Systems 9.1 Propeller Bather Guards 9.2 Waterjets 9.3 Steering 10. Bilge Pumping 11. Stability 11.1 Intact Stability 11.1.1 Intact Stability: All boats 11.1.2 Intact Stability: Rigid Hull boats 11.1.3 Intact Stability: Inflatable Boats, RIBs and Boats with a Buoyant Collar 11.1.4 Intact Stability: Survivor Recovery – All boat types 11.1.5 Maximum Personnel Capacities 11.1.6 Crew and Survivor Weight Definitions 11.2 Swamping and Drainage 11.2.1 Swamping 11.2.2 Drainage 11.3 Damage Stability 11.3.1 General Requirements 11.3.2 Damage Stability: Rigid Hull Boats 11.3.3 Damage Stability: Inflatable Boats 11.3.4 Damage Stability: RIBs and Boats with a Buoyant Collar 11.3.5 Buoyancy Tube Sub-division for Inflatable Boats, RIBs and Boats with a Hollow Buoyant Collar 11.3.6 Sub- division of RIBs and Boats with a Buoyant Collar 11.3.7 Damage Stability: Survivor Recovery 11.4 Dynamic Stability 11.5 Boat Righting Systems 11.6 Stability When Using Onboard Lifting Devices. 11.7 Stability Trials 11.8 Capacity Plate 12. Freeboard 12.1 All boats 12.2 Rigid Hull boats 12.3 Inflatable and Rigid Inflatable Boats (RIBs) 13. Life Saving Appliances including Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 13.1 General Requirements 13.2 Lifejackets 13.3 Operationally Specific PPE 13.4 Use of Retro-Reflective Materials on Life Saving Appliances 13.5 Pyrotechnics 13.6 Training Manual 13.7 Instruction Manual (on board maintenance) 13.8 Additional Equipment Requirements 14. Fire Safety 15. Fire Appliances 16. Radio Communications Equipment 17 Launch and Recovery Equipment 18. Navigational Equipment and Navigation Lights 19. Boat Storage 20. Anchors and Towing 21. Equipment Stowage 22. Protection of Personnel by Design 23. Medical Care 24. Owner’s Manual 25. Maintenance 26. Manning 27 Procedures, Certification, Examination, Maintenance and Reporting of Accidents 27.1 Introduction 27.2 Requirements and Procedures for Rescue Boats to be Examined and Certificated 27.3 Compliance Examination and Issue of a Certificate under the Code 27.4 Renewal Examination 27.5 Intermediate Examination 27.6 Annual Examination 27.7 Additional Requirements for Inflatable and Rigid Inflatable Boats 27.8 Appeal Against the Findings of an Examination 27.9 Maintaining and Operating the Rescue Boat 27.10 Accident Reporting 27.11 Other Conditions Applying to Certificates – Validity and Cancellation of Certificates 27.12 Rescue Boats other than UK Rescue Boats Operating in UK Waters 28. Safety Procedures 28.1 Applicability of other Codes of Practice 28.2 General Requirements 28.3 Launch of Rescue Boat on Service 28.3.1 Pre-launch Requirements 28.3.2 Transit to Launch Site 28.3.3 Launching 28.4 Rescue Boat Under Way 28.4.1 Communications 28.4.2 Boat Handling 28.4.3 Navigation 28.4.4 Search 28.4.5 Rescue 28.4.6 Towing 28.4.7 Operation in surf 28.4.8 Helicopter Operations 28.4.9 Cliff / Cave Rescue 28.4.10 Carriage of Passengers 28.4.11 Fuel Management Afloat 28.4.12 Battery Management Afloat 28.4.13 Maintenance Afloat 28.4.14 Pyrotechnics 28.4.15 Ballasting 28.4.16 Anchoring and Veering 28.4.17 Operation of Equipment 28.5 Emergencies onboard the Rescue Boat 28.5.1 Capsize 28.5.2 Engine Failure 28.5.3 Man Overboard 28.5.4 Fire 28.5.5 Crew Disablement 28.5.6 Collision and Damage 28.5.7 Operating in Shallow Water and Grounding 28.5.8 Operation During Pollution Incidents 28.5.9 Alarms 28.6 Boat Recovery 28.7 Restoring the Boat to a Ready State 29. Pollution Prevention 30. Testing APPENDIX 1: Inflatable Boat Stability Trials APPENDIX 2: Training Requirements APPENDIX 3: Risk Assessment Guidelines APPENDIX 4: Guidance on Safety Management System and Documentation APPENDIX 5: Compliance Check List APPENDIX 6: Bibliography and References APPENDIX 7: Compliance Examination and Declaration Report For a Less Than 15 metres Rescue Boat (RB2 Form) APPENDIX 8: Code of Practice for Open Rescue Boats Less Than 15 metres in Length, Rescue Boat Organisation Declaration APPENDIX 9: Rescue Boat Certificate of Compliance APPENDIX 10: General Exemption 1 FOREWORD 1.1 The Maritime & Coastguard Agency (MCA) and a number of Rescue Boat Organisations providing rescue facilities around the United Kingdom recognised that the role of the Rescue Boat Organisation was not specifically covered by any formally recognised national standard, given that the MCA’s existing Codes for safety of small vessels were not applicable as these rescue boats did not operate on a commercial basis, and their exposure to risk was limited by both the short distances over which they operated, and the limited time over which they were in operation. 1.2 The original draft of this Code was completed in 2005 under the lead of the RNLI and a working group comprising representatives of: • British Marine Federation (BMF) • Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) • Royal Lifesaving Society UK (RLSS UK) • Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) • Royal Yachting Association (RYA) • Surf Life Saving Great Britain (SLSGB) • The boat manufacturing industry • Independent Rescue Boat Organisations. 1.3 The working group identified the benefits in developing the Code as: • Improved Rescue Boat safety; • Harmonisation of operations and standards across the Rescue Boat field; • MCA validation of Rescue Boat operations; and • Clarification of legal standing of Rescue Boat operations. 1.4 In 2011 the MCA re-drafted the Code, taking into account updates to technical standards, and clarifying the requirements and responsibilities for initial and renewal examinations and MCA audits. There has been minimal change to the technical requirements for rescue boats other than those that are consequential to other regulatory changes. The opportunity has been taken to remove operational guidance which does not relate to the rescue boat itself, as well as restructure the Code so that it follows the chapter headings of other MCA small vessel codes. The principal change has been to implement the government commitment to reduce costs for the voluntary sector; reflecting the philosophy that the “Big Society” should take a more proactive role in managing provision of services to the public; and recognizing that those best able to manage the safety of a boat are those who run it on a regular basis. As a result, the requirement for independent examinations of the rescue boat has been removed, and replaced by self certification by a Responsible Person of the Rescue Boat Organisation, on the advice of a Competent Person. The Code of Practice for Open Rescue Boats of Less than 15 metres in Length, Rev. 05/13 1of 155 1.5 The safety of Rescue Boat Organisations and those they assist is dependent upon the successful integration of many factors, not simply the design of the equipment. Therefore this Code also includes sections on Equipment, Safety Procedures, Training and Maintenance. 1.6 The level of safety that this Code sets out to achieve is considered to be commensurate with the current expectations of Rescue Boat Organisations, those to whom that give assistance, and of the MCA that tasks those Organisations that are Declared Facilities for UK SAR. It is recognised that a Rescue Boat is intended to provide a rapid response platform for persons in distress and to render assistance in the most practical and appropriate fashion. It is also recognised that this may compromise survivor comfort in the need for expeditious action, however the safety and welfare of survivors is to be considered at all times. 1.7 The safety assessment employed throughout the development of the Code relates only to the rescue boat and those on board the rescue boat at any time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rescue Boat Code)
    The Code of Practice for Open Rescue Boats of Less than 15 Metres in Length (The Rescue Boat Code) The Code of Practice for Open Rescue Boats of Less than 15 metres in Length Rev 0712 THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR OPEN RESCUE BOATS OF LESS THAN 15 METRES IN LENGTH CONTENTS 1. Foreword 2. Definitions 3. Application and Interpretation 3.1 Application 3.2 Applicability of other codes of practice, standards and legislation 3.3 Certification and Audit 3.4 Compliance 3.5 Areas of Operation 3.6 Management 3.7 Training 3.8 Standard Operating Procedures and Incident Action Plans 3.9 Emergency Procedures 3.10 Maintenance Requirements 3.11 Record of Services 4. Construction and Structural Strength 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Operational and Design Limits 4.3 General Requirements 4.4 Boat Construction and Structural Strength 4.5 Construction and Structural Strength: Rigid Hull Boats and boats fitted with a buoyant collar 4.6 Construction and Structural Strength: Inflatable boats and Rigid Inflatable Boats 4.7 Recesses 4.8 Fixings 5. Weathertight Integrity 5.1 Openings 5.2 Skin Fittings 5.3 Ventilation 6. Water Freeing Arrangements 2 The Code of Practice for Open Rescue Boats of Less than 15 metres in Length Rev 0712 7. Machinery 7.1 Propulsion: General Requirements 7.2 Engine Stop Cords 7.3 Inboard Engines 7.4 Outboard Engines 7.5 Emergency Propulsion 7.6 Engine Cooling Systems 7.7 Exhaust Systems 7.8 Fuel 8. Electrical Arrangements 8.1 General Requirements 8.2 Batteries 8.3 Cables 8.4 Electrical Protection 8.5 Switches 8.6 Earthing and Lightning Protection 8.7 Electrical Spaces 8.8 Lighting 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Note
    Trans RINA, Vol 154, Part B1, Intl J Small Craft Tech, Jan-Jun 2012 TECHNICAL NOTE HYDROELASTIC INFLATABLE BOATS: RELEVANT LITERATURE AND NEW DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS (DOI No: 10.3940/rina.ijsct.2012.b1.125tn) P K Halswell, P A Wilson and D J Taunton, University of Southampton, UK S Austen, RNLI, UK. SUMMARY Inflatable boats are considerably more flexible than conventional metal or composite vessels. The RNLI have developed an inflatable boat, the IB1, with improved performance which has been attributed to its flexibility or hydroelasticity. Current design methodologies for planing vessels predict the performance assuming it is rigid. Designing an entirely hydroelastic boat presents completely new design challenges and will require new design methodologies in the future. This paper considers how to approach an entirely hydroelastic planing vessel and how to divide the boat into practical problems. A design approach taking into account hydroelasticity could potentially improve the performance further by decreasing boat motions, reducing added resistance in waves and minimising the slamming accelerations. This paper reviews the literature relevant to rigid inflatable and inflatable boats and shows the construction of the IB1. The hydroelastic design problem is broken down into three main hydroelastic events: global hydroelasticity, hydroelastic planing surfaces and hydroelastic slamming. Each event is defined, the relevant literature is reviewed and the possible advantages are discussed. A design approach is suggested using a hydroelastic design cycle. The hydrodynamic problem of interacting sponsons is briefly discussed. NOMENCLATURE minimum of two casualties or one in the prone position. The RNLI use the IB1 in littoral waters where the water Length of cantilever beam (m) can be very shallow and there can be large steep breaking p Internal pressure (N m-2) waves caused by the reducing water depth near the shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenders & Toys Guide
    OCTOBER 2016 TRUTH • OPINION KNOWLEDGE • IDEAS & SUPERYACHT OWNER INSIGHT KORMARAN Luxury transformed – a class of its own SPECIFICATIONS e essence of the Kormaran is to transform, to convert itself. To perfectly adjust to every situation. e KORMARAN K7 First Edition combines optimum comfort with safety, power LOA: 7,1M and elegance. Whether gliding, driving or ying the K7 FE, unique experiences and driving BEAM: 1,7M - 3,7M sensations can be expected. DRAUGHT: 0,4M e transformation system is a groundbreaking innovation, allowing the Kormaran to change TOP SPEED: 70KMH / 38KNOTS the distance between the hulls and the height of the central passenger cabin. In this way it RANGE: 200KM / 108NM allows the variability and the multifunctionality of the vessel. WEIGHT: 1,5T / 2,0T While conventional boats cannot change their characteristics, the Kormaran can transform ENGINES: 2 / 3 X 300HP even while in motion, elegantly combining the agility of a monohull for quick manoevres with ROTAX JET PROPULSION the stability of a catamaran or trimaran. In addition, the K7 FE can gracefully transform into a DELIVERY TIME: 12 MONTHS large sunbathing island, without compromising transport or storage space. Wilhelm-Spazier Str. 2a, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria T: +43 662 828886 500 E: [email protected] W: www.kormaran.com TENDERS & TOYS GUIDE All your tenders, all your toys Tenders Toys and much more... BUILD | DELIVERY | AFTER-SALES | BROKERAGE | SLIDES | JET SKIS | SEABOBS | FLYBOARDS | & LOTS MORE Contact | UK: +44 2380 01 63 63 | FR: +33 489 733 347
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Rigid Inflatable Boat
    Report on the investigation of two people being thrown from a high-speed rigid inflatable boat with the loss of their lives in Milarrochy Bay, Loch Lomond, UK on 13 March 2005 Marine Accident Investigation Branch Carlton House Carlton Place Southampton United Kingdom SO15 2DZ Report No 24/2005 December 2005 Extract from The United Kingdom Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2005 - Regulation 5: "The sole objective of the investigation of an accident under the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2005 shall be the prevention of future accidents through the ascertainment of its causes and circumstances. It shall not be the purpose of an investigation to determine liability nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve its objective, to apportion blame. " NOTE This report is not written with litigation in mind and, pursuant to Regulation 13(9) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2005, shall be inadmissible in any judicial proceedings whose purpose, or one of whose purpose is to attribute or apportion liability or blame. CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS SYNOPSIS 1 SECTION 1 - FACTUAL INFORMATION 3 1.1 Particulars of the rigid inflatable boat and accident 3 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Narrative 4 1.4 Environmental conditions on Loch Lomond 11 1.5 inspections of the RIB and the outboard engine 11 15.1 General description 11 1.5.2 Inspections 13 1.5.3 The buoyancy tubes 14 1.5.4 The engine 14 1.5.5 Toe straps 15 1.6 The steering
    [Show full text]
  • Keynote 1 However Alongside the Certificate They Are Also Requirements, Component Materials and Investigating Methods to Mitigate the Human Construction Techniques
    DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF INFLATABLE BOATS: FLEXIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS P.K. Halswell EngD Student, University of Southampton Prof. P.A. Wilson Professor of Ship Dynamics, University of Southampton Dr. D.J. Taunton Lecturer, University of Southampton S. Austen Head of Engineering Support, RNLI ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the design and performance of inflatable boats where the structural stiffness is supplied by the inflatable tubes and jointed composite sandwich panels which allow large deformations in the hull form. Anecdotal evidence has shown that this flexibility or hydroelasticity of an inflatable boat (IB) improves its performance, especially in waves. It is hoped that this hydroelasticity can be optimised to improve aspects of the performance, including reductions to the boat motion therefore minimising the human exposure to vibrations and added resistance in waves. This paper discusses each area of hydroelasticity found in an inflatable boat, it defines each problem, shows the current literature and possible methods of investigation. The areas of hydroelasticity include; global hydroelasticity, hydroelastic planing surfaces and hydroelastic slamming. This paper also discusses the wave and spray generation of a vessel with sponsons and relates it to the effect on boat motion and resistance. Finally this paper discusses the air and water borne noise produced by these types of vessels. 1 INTRODUCTION high and low frequency vibrations with large accelerations. In 2002 a European Directive This project is supported and partially funded by (2002/44/EC) was proposed on the minimum the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI). health and safety requirements regarding the The RNLI is a charity that aims to “save lives at exposure of workers to physical vibrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Search and Rescue Manual
    Maritime Search and Rescue Manual NOVEMBER 2017 DEVELOPED FOR LOW-RESOURCE AREAS About this manual The primary aim of the Maritime Search and Rescue Manual is to save lives by providing a resource containing essential skills, knowledge and guidance for those operating in a maritime environment. The resource is designed for organisations based in areas with limited access to equipment. This manual has been designed as a guidance document and can be adapted to suit the local environment. This manual will be reviewed after 3 years. Please send any comments and feedback to: [email protected] November 2017 Piloted and developed by: Royal National Lifeboat Institution West Quay Road Poole Dorset BH15 1HZ England Tel: +44 (0) 1202 663000 Web: RNLI.org Email: [email protected] Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI), a charity registered in England and Wales (209603) and Scotland (SC037736). Registered charity number 20003326 in the Republic of Ireland. Disclaimer This document may be reproduced without the prior consent The content of this manual is for general guidance only. of the RNLI. The RNLI takes no responsibility for any outcomes It represents best practice as at the date of publication and should as a result of this manual. not be considered as legal advice. Those using this manual should seek professional advice as and when necessary. The RNLI does not Photos: Various contributors for the RNLI, Shutterstock accept responsibility for any errors in this document. 2 Contents Unit 1: Personal protective equipment (PPE)
    [Show full text]
  • Lifeboat Institution
    urnal of the National Lifeboat Institution 3lume 53 Number 523 Fhe Lifeboat pring 1993 Silver Medal and Vellum Services New Trent and Severn classes News and Views The prototype Severn class Loa 17m (55ft 9in) Beam 5.5m (18ft) Draft 1.68m (5ft 6in) Displacement 37.5 tonnes Speed 25 knots H The Spring 1993 Lifeboat Royal National RNLI News What's happening in and around the Institution Lifeboat Lifeboat Services Institution Notable launches around the coast Fast Work 11 Contents The development of the 25-knot FABs 3 and 4 - now the Volume 53 Severn and Trent classes Past and Present 15 Number 523 From THE LIFEBOAT of 1963 and one of today's lifeboatmen Chairman: Ceremonies 16 MICHAEL VERNON New all-weather and inshore lifeboats named and dedicated Director and Secretary: Your Letters 17 LT CDR BRIAN MILES RD FNI RNR Your views on all aspects of lifeboats and related subjects Membership News 18 Last year, this year and TV adverts Editor: MIKE FLOYD Assistant Editor: GILL MACE Bookshelf 19 Editorial Assistant: MARY GYOPARI Books of RNLI and maritime interest reviewed Lifeboat Services 20 Advertisement Manager: Services for August, September and October 1992 BARBARA TROUSDELL Classified Advertisements: Around the Fundraising Regions 23 MARION BARDSLEY Branches and guilds from the Southern and Republic of Ireland regions The Fundraisers 25 Fundraising events across the British Isles Headquarters: Royal National Lifeboat Institution, People and Places 31 West Quay Road, Around and about the RNLI Poole, Dorset BH15 I HZ. Awards to Coxswains and Crew Members 33 Telephone Poole (0202) 671133 Telex 41328.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE ARCHAEOLOGY and LUNDY MARINE NATURE RESERVE - an ASSESSMENT by P.C.ROBERTSON Punchbowl House, Strathblane, by Glasgow, Scotland
    Rep . Lundy Field Soc. 45 MARINE ARCHAEOLOGY AND LUNDY MARINE NATURE RESERVE - AN ASSESSMENT By P.C.ROBERTSON Punchbowl House, Strathblane, By Glasgow, Scotland. G63 9ES. INTRODUCTION This report details the results of three weeks of fieldwork carried out in the waters of Lundy Marine Nature Reserve during June and July 1994 by Philip Robertson, Marcus Heyes, Andrew Hibbert, and Alan James. The team operated from a Rigid Inflatable Boat with SCUBA diving equipment. Using Dive into History forms (Fig. 1), a sport diver's tick-in-the-box recording form for shipwrecks being jointly promoted by The Royal Commission on the Historic Monuments for England (RCHME) and the Nautical Archaeology Society <NAS), basic data on wreck condition, burial location, marine life colonisation and site history could be collected with the minimum of difficulty. This was backed up by stills photography on each site as well as underwater video footage. The aim of the fieldwork was to provide an initial assessment of the marine archaeological resource within Lundy Marine Nature Reserve <MNR) and to suggest how management of the submerged cultural heritage might be integrated within the overall management of the MNR as outlined in its management plan (English Nature 1994). In connection with this Marcus Heyes concentrated on establishing the importance of the wrecks within the MNR to marine conservation. This is the subject of a separate submission. For the purposes of information dissemination, copies of this report have been sent to English Nature, RCHME, Devon County Council, the Archaeological Diving Unit, the Landmark Trust, and the National Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamic Simulation of Frontal Plane Deck Motion During a Mechanical Shock on a Lifeboat
    Hydrodynamic simulation of frontal plane deck motion during a mechanical shock on a lifeboat Jens Thiele, Ya Huang*, Jason Knight School of Mechanical & Design Engineering University of Portsmouth Portsmouth, UK Abstract—Multi-axial repeated mechanical shocks For the fluid-hull interaction, the braking force at the free presented in the frontal plane of any planing crafts during sea water surface entry depends on a number of factors. An transits impose an increased risk to injury for occupants. analytical prediction of the vertical hull entry for a complex However, understanding of the abrupt motion in this plane is three-dimensional hull design is not possible. This study will seldom documented in adequate detail. With the help of focus on a numerical approach using different impact velocity computational fluidic dynamics (CFD) software, the study and the entry angle in the frontal plane. The general approach simulates the boat motion during different water entry has been to solve the flow around a two-dimensional wedge conditions. An Atlantic 21 lifeboat is dropped into water with entering the water surface with a constant velocity iteratively different drop heights and entry roll angles in simulation. The to solve the equations for the pressure distribution on the vertical, lateral and angular roll acceleration of the lifeboat are wedge [3]. It is based on a nonlinear boundary element method derived from the CFD simulations. The vertical acceleration calculated at a crew seat is considerably higher than that at the (BEM) with a jet flow approximation for symmetrical impact boat centre of mass (CoM) in the frontal plane.
    [Show full text]
  • MC-CATALOGUE-100616.Pdf
    1 2 Our logo completely characterises our Company’s philosophy. The same way a Navigator’s sextant is considered an eminently practical back-up navigation tool for ships, we at Marine Consultants (Trinidad) Limited, work alongside the customer to navigate through the marketplace. We help you efficiently manage your shipping business, with safety and technical experience at the forefront of our mind. Since being founded in 1971 by Master Mariners, our goal has been to “Keep Marine Operators Operating.” We realise the high cost of downtime and we aim to continually minimise its effects on our customers. To achieve this, we supply equipment and maintenance services for vessels and offshore platforms. We also provide consultancy services for asset management and safety procedures. We draw on a network of local and international expertise that offers world-class products and services to the maritime industry. We work hand in hand with our customers as they rely on us to understand their business process, in order to offer appropriate solutions that add both value and assurance to stakeholders. Our clients come from many sectors including the Oil and Gas Industry, Marine, National Security and Pleasure Crafts. ISO 9001: 2008 CERTIFIED | STOW CERTIFIED: 000-290 3 VISION STATEMENT Marine Consultants (Trinidad) Limited will be recognised as the industry leader for customer satisfaction by delivering quality products and services to the marine and offshore industries, and all areas of safety. We will meet and exceed internationally established regulatory compliance through innovation and best practice. A culture of unity and empowerment will permeate all areas of our company with the customer as our driver.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Performance of Inflatable Boats: Flexibility and Environmental Considerations
    DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF INFLATABLE BOATS: FLEXIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS P.K. Halswell EngD Student, University of Southampton Prof. P.A. Wilson Professor of Ship Dynamics, University of Southampton Dr. D.J. Taunton Lecturer, University of Southampton S. Austen Head of Engineering Support, RNLI ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the design and performance of inflatable boats where the structural stiffness is supplied by the inflatable tubes and jointed composite sandwich panels which allow large deformations in the hull form. Anecdotal evidence has shown that this flexibility or hydroelasticity of an inflatable boat (IB) improves its performance, especially in waves. It is hoped that this hydroelasticity can be optimised to improve aspects of the performance, including reductions to the boat motion therefore minimising the human exposure to vibrations and added resistance in waves. This paper discusses each area of hydroelasticity found in an inflatable boat, it defines each problem, shows the current literature and possible methods of investigation. The areas of hydroelasticity include; global hydroelasticity, hydroelastic planing surfaces and hydroelastic slamming. This paper also discusses the wave and spray generation of a vessel with sponsons and relates it to the effect on boat motion and resistance. Finally this paper discusses the air and water borne noise produced by these types of vessels. 1 INTRODUCTION high and low frequency vibrations with large accelerations. In 2002 a European Directive This project is supported and partially funded by (2002/44/EC) was proposed on the minimum the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI). health and safety requirements regarding the The RNLI is a charity that aims to “save lives at exposure of workers to physical vibrations.
    [Show full text]