A Crocodylian-Style Cloaca in a Non-Avialan Dinosaur
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Defining the Molecular Pathologies in Cloaca Malformation: Similarities Between Mouse and Human Laura A
© 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Disease Models & Mechanisms (2014) 7, 483-493 doi:10.1242/dmm.014530 RESEARCH ARTICLE Defining the molecular pathologies in cloaca malformation: similarities between mouse and human Laura A. Runck1, Anna Method1, Andrea Bischoff2, Marc Levitt2, Alberto Peña2, Margaret H. Collins3, Anita Gupta3, Shiva Shanmukhappa3, James M. Wells1,4 and Géraldine Guasch1,* ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Anorectal malformations are congenital anomalies that form a Anorectal malformations are congenital anomalies that encompass spectrum of disorders, from the most benign type with excellent a wide spectrum of diseases and occur in ~1 in 5000 live births functional prognosis, to very complex, such as cloaca malformation (Levitt and Peña, 2007). The anorectal and urogenital systems arise in females in which the rectum, vagina and urethra fail to develop from a common transient embryonic structure called the cloaca that separately and instead drain via a single common channel into the exists from the fourth week of intrauterine development in humans perineum. The severity of this phenotype suggests that the defect (Fritsch et al., 2007; Kluth, 2010) and between days 10.5-12.5 post- occurs in the early stages of embryonic development of the organs fertilization in mice (Seifert et al., 2008). By the sixth week in derived from the cloaca. Owing to the inability to directly investigate humans the embryonic cloaca is divided, resulting in a ventral human embryonic cloaca development, current research has relied urogenital sinus and a separate dorsal hindgut. By the twelfth week, on the use of mouse models of anorectal malformations. However, the anal canal, vaginal and urethral openings are established. -
A Neoceratopsian Dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia And
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7 OPEN A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia ✉ Congyu Yu 1 , Albert Prieto-Marquez2, Tsogtbaatar Chinzorig 3,4, Zorigt Badamkhatan4,5 & Mark Norell1 1234567890():,; Ceratopsia is a diverse dinosaur clade from the Middle Jurassic to Late Cretaceous with early diversification in East Asia. However, the phylogeny of basal ceratopsians remains unclear. Here we report a new basal neoceratopsian dinosaur Beg tse based on a partial skull from Baruunbayan, Ömnögovi aimag, Mongolia. Beg is diagnosed by a unique combination of primitive and derived characters including a primitively deep premaxilla with four pre- maxillary teeth, a trapezoidal antorbital fossa with a poorly delineated anterior margin, very short dentary with an expanded and shallow groove on lateral surface, the derived presence of a robust jugal having a foramen on its anteromedial surface, and five equally spaced tubercles on the lateral ridge of the surangular. This is to our knowledge the earliest known occurrence of basal neoceratopsian in Mongolia, where this group was previously only known from Late Cretaceous strata. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that it is sister to all other neoceratopsian dinosaurs. 1 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York 10024, USA. 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, ICTA-ICP, Edifici Z, c/de les Columnes s/n Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4 Institute of Paleontology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, ✉ Ulaanbaatar 15160, Mongolia. -
Evaluating and Treating the Reproductive System
18_Reproductive.qxd 8/23/2005 11:44 AM Page 519 CHAPTER 18 Evaluating and Treating the Reproductive System HEATHER L. BOWLES, DVM, D ipl ABVP-A vian , Certified in Veterinary Acupuncture (C hi Institute ) Reproductive Embryology, Anatomy and Physiology FORMATION OF THE AVIAN GONADS AND REPRODUCTIVE ANATOMY The avian gonads arise from more than one embryonic source. The medulla or core arises from the meso- nephric ducts. The outer cortex arises from a thickening of peritoneum along the root of the dorsal mesentery within the primitive gonadal ridge. Mesodermal germ cells that arise from yolk-sac endoderm migrate into this gonadal ridge, forming the ovary. The cells are initially distributed equally to both sides. In the hen, these germ cells are then preferentially distributed to the left side, and migrate from the right to the left side as well.58 Some avian species do in fact have 2 ovaries, including the brown kiwi and several raptor species. Sexual differ- entiation begins by day 5 in passerines and domestic fowl and by day 11 in raptor species. Differentiation of the ovary is characterized by development of the cortex, while the medulla develops into the testis.30,58 As the embryo develops, the germ cells undergo three phases of oogenesis. During the first phase, the oogonia actively divide for a defined time period and then stop at the first prophase of the first maturation division. During the second phase, the germ cells grow in size to become primary oocytes. This occurs approximately at the time of hatch in domestic fowl. During the third phase, oocytes complete the first maturation division to 18_Reproductive.qxd 8/23/2005 11:44 AM Page 520 520 Clinical Avian Medicine - Volume II become secondary oocytes. -
Avian Reproductive System—Male
eXtension Avian Reproductive System—Male articles.extension.org/pages/65373/avian-reproductive-systemmale Written by: Dr. Jacquie Jacob, University of Kentucky An understanding of the male avian reproductive system is useful for anyone who breeds chickens or other poultry. One remarkable aspect of the male avian reproductive system is that the sperm remain viable at body temperature. Consequently, the avian male reproductive tract is entirely inside the body, as shown in Figure 1. In this way, the reproductive system of male birds differs from that of male mammals. The reproductive tract in male mammals is outside the body because mammalian sperm does not remain viable at body temperature. Fig. 1. Location of the male reproductive system in a chicken. Source: Jacquie Jacob, University of Kentucky. Parts of the Male Chicken Reproductive System In the male chicken, as with other birds, the testes produce sperm, and then the sperm travel through a vas deferens to the cloaca. Figure 2 shows the main components of the reproductive tract of a male chicken. Fig. 2. Reproductive tract of a male chicken. Source: Jacquie Jacob, University of Kentucky. The male chicken has two testes, located along the chicken's back, near the top of the kidneys. The testes are elliptical and light yellow. Both gonads (testes) are developed in a male chicken, whereas a female chicken has only one mature gonad (ovary). Another difference between the sexes involves sperm production versus egg production. A rooster continues to produce new sperm while it is sexually mature. A female chicken, on the other hand, hatches with the total number of ova it will ever have; that is, no new ova are produced after a female chick hatches. -
Reptilian Renal Structure and Function
REPTILIAN RENAL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION Jeanette Wyneken, PhD Florida Atlantic University, Dept. of Biological Sciences, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA ABSTRACT This overview focuses on the urinary component of the urogenital system. Here I define terms, synthesize the relevant literature on reptilian renal structure, discuss structural – functional relationships, and provide comparisons to other vertebrate renal form and function. The urinary and reproductive components of the urogenital system develop in conjunction with one another from two adjacent parts of the mesoderm. As development proceeds, ducts that drain nitrogenous wastes in the embryo are co-opted by the reproductive system or they regress (e.g., mesonephric ducts become the Müllarian ducts in females, pronephric ducts become the Ductus deferens in males) and new ducts (ureters) form to drain the kidneys. Urogenital System Consists of Kidneys, Gonads and Duct Systems • Urinary system is formed by the kidneys, including their nephrons (= nephric tubules) and collecting ducts. The collecting ducts drain products from the nephrons into to ureters that themselves drain to the cloaca via the (usually paired) urogenital papillae in the dorsolateral cloacal wall. A urinary bladder that opens in the floor of the cloaca may or may not be present depending upon species. • The genital system (gonads and their ducts) forms later in development and is discussed here only when relevant to urinary function. Kidney Form and Terminology The literature includes a number of descriptive terms for the developing kidney that often confuse more than clarify the form of the kidney. Understanding the basics of kidney development should help. The kidneys arise as paired structures from embryonic mesoderm. -
Chapter 23 Hunter-Gatherer Families and Parenting
797 Chapter 23 Hunter-Gatherer Families and Parenting Coren L. Apicella and Alyssa N. Crittenden Our species is characterized by remarkable biological success. In the past 10,000 years, since the advent of agriculture, our population has increased over 1,000-fold (Coale, 1974; Westing, 2013). We have successfully populated all reaches of the planet, calling the most extreme of habitats, home. This remarkable success is largely a consequence of our extraordinary ability to cooperate with one another. While cooperation is observed in many other species, human cooperation is anomalous in both scale and nature. Humans are unique in that they form long-lasting, nonreproductive ties with genetically unrelated individuals. Social learning in humans further accentuates the utility of cooperative ties by allowing adaptive information to accrue over many generations (Boyd & Richerson, 2009). It was these cognitive and social processes that enabled us to adapt to a wide-range of environments and ultimately led to our unsurpassed success (Tennie, Call, & Tomasello, 2009). Possibly the biggest challenge faced by our Pleistocene ancestors, who lived roughly 2.5 million years ago until the advent of agriculture, was how to raise energetically expensive, big-brained children in unpredictable and changing climates. The solution to this problem was to extend cooperation beyond the pair bond and nuclear families (Emlen, 1995; Hill & Hurtado, 2009; Hrdy, 1999). Thus, in order to understand hunter-gatherer families and parenting, one must consider the reproductive -
SHARK DISSECTION INSTRUCTIONS Part 1: External
SHARK DISSECTION INSTRUCTIONS Part 1: External Anatomy The shark has a graceful and streamlined body shape built for fast, long distance swimming. The body is divided into the head, trunk, and tail. STEP 1: Touch the shark! All members of the lab group should touch the shark. Pick it up, squeeze it, feel it! STEP 2: Measure the shark! Use your ruler to measure the length of the shark. Remember to measure in centimeters! The spiny dogfish has a double dorsal fin. The anterior dorsal fin is larger than the posterior dorsal fin. The spiny dogfish has the presence two dorsal spines, one immediately in front of each dorsal fin. The spines carry a poison secreted by glands at their base. The caudal fin is divided into two lobes: a larger dorsal lobe and a smaller ventral lobe. This type of tail is known as a heterocercal tail. STEP 3: Observe the exterior of the shark. Along the sides of the body is a light-colored horizontal stripe called the lateral line. The line is made up of a series of tiny pores that lead to receptors that are sensitive to the mechanical movement of water and sudden changes of pressure. A. Examine the anterior view of the shark. • The rostrum is the pointed snout at the anterior end. This tapered tip at the anterior end helps overcome water resistance in swimming. (See Figure 1 in An Illustrated Dissection Guide To The Shark, pg 2). • The eyes are prominent in sharks and are very similar to the eyes of man. -
Beaver Fact Sheet
BEAVER Castor canadensis The beaver (Castor canadensis) is the largest rodent in North America. It is easily recognized by its large, flat, bare, scaled tail and fully webbed rear feet. Beaver range in North America includes most of the United States and southern Canada. The beaver played an important role in the early colonization of North America, as trappers came in search of pelts. At one time, the beaver population had declined to the point that they were absent from most of their range. However today, beaver populations have rebounded and, in some areas, they create conflicts with humans. Vermont Wildlife Fact Sheet Physical Description A beaver’s head is relatively similar to that of an aquatic small and round with large, well mammal than a terrestrial one. Beavers normally have dark developed incisor teeth for brown fur with lighter highlights gnawing wood. As with other The front feet of a beaver are but some with black, white, and rodents, these teeth grow not webbed, but have strong silver coats have been reported. continually. If opposing teeth do claws for digging. Front legs are The under fur is very dense, not match correctly, allowing tucked up against the chest short, and waterproof, with normal wearing and sharpening when the beaver swims. The sparse, coarse, shiny guard hairs action, they can grow rear feet are large and webbed protruding through. excessively to the point where for powerful swimming and provide support when walking An average adult beaver eating is nearly impossible and starvation results. Flat-surfaced over mud, like snowshoes. weighs 40 to 60 pounds. -
Gross and Microscopic Anatomy of the Structures
GROSS AND MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY OF THE STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN THE PRODUCTION OF SEMINAL FLUID IN THE CHICKEN BY Carl Edward Knight A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Poultry Science 1967 5// ABSTRACT GROSS AND MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY OF THE STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN THE PRODUCTION OF SEMINAL FLUID IN THE CHICKEN by Carl Edward Knight The gross and microscopic anatomy of the structures involved in the production of seminal fluid in the chicken are discussed. The phallus, round bodies, lymph folds and vascular bodies were found to be the structures directly involved in seminal fluid production. Sur- rounding structures were discussed for orientation and illustrations were presented to complement the discussion. The-cloaca is composed of three chambers; proctodeum, urodeum, and coprodeum. Externally it appears as two lips, a larger dorsal lip and a smaller ventral lip. Its surface is covered with epithelium characteristic of the general body surface. The proctodeal fold arises from the margin of the lips and forms the cloacal opening by its incomplete central fusion. The proctodeal cavity is the most caudal of the cloacal chambers. The phallus, round bodies and lymph folds lie in this chamber. The opening to the cloacal bursa is found in the dorsal aspect of this chamber. The uroproctodeal fold forms the cranial boundary of the proctodeum and the caudal boundary of the urodeum. The urodeum is Carl Edward Knight the middle chamber of the cloaca. The ejaculatory papillae and ureters empty into this chamber. The uroproctodeal fold forms the cranial boundary of the urodeum and the caudal boundary of the coprodeum. -
A Battering Ram?
A Battering Ram? All evidence suggests that Pachycephalosaur skulls were built to withstand extreme forces 9 inches of solid bone Bone organized in a radial arrangement- structural support Articulation btw back of skull and vertebrae oriented to transfer forces linearly Articulation btw back of skull and vertebral column built to withstand sideways forces Vertebral column has tongue and groove articulations Spinal column is an S-shaped shock absorber BUT There is no ‘locking’ mechanism on skull to keep battering heads aligned Some Pachycephalosaurs have imprinted blood vessels on dome These factors suggests that head- butting may not be likely Intraspecies Competition (typically male-male) Females are typically choosey Why? Because they have more to loose Common rule in biology: Females are expensive to lose, males are cheap (e.g. deer hunting) Females choose the male most likely to provide the most successful offspring Males compete with each other for access to female vs. female chooses the strongest male Choosey females // Strong males have more offspring => SEXUAL selection Many ways to do this... But: In general, maximize competition and minimize accidental deaths (= no fitness) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PontCXFgs0M http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1941236/giraffe_fight/ http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYDx1y38vGw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULRtdk-3Yh4 Air-filled horn cores vs. solid bone skull caps... Gotta have a cheezy animated slide. Homalocephale Pachycephalosaurus Prenocephale Tylocephale Stegoceras Head butting Pachycephalosaurs Bone structure was probably strong enough to withstand collision Convex nature would favor glancing blows Instead, dome and spines seem better suited for “flank butting” So.. -
OST: Public Access to Federally Funded Research
Response to the Office of Science and Technology Policy public consultation on Public Access to Federally Funded Research To: Office of Science and Technology Policy Attn: Open Government Recommendations 725 17th Street Washington, DC 20502 via e-mail to: [email protected] January 2010 The Royal Society welcomes the opportunity to respond to the OSTP consultation on public access to federally funded research. The issue of open access, in general, of which this consultation is a significant part is of critical importance to the future development of scholarly communication and we believe it is essential to consult as widely as possible before preparing any legislation. Introduction The Royal Society is the UK’s national academy of science and has been publishing scientific journals since 1665 when Philosophical Transactions was founded. Philosophical Transactions effectively invented the system of peer review which is now standard practice for all high quality journals. It is now published biweekly and is the world's longest running scientific journal. The Society publishes seven peer reviewed journals in all: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A and Proceedings of the Royal Society A cover mathematics, the physical sciences and engineering; Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B and Proceedings of the Royal Society B cover the biological sciences; Biology Letters provides rapid publication of short articles on all aspects of biology; Journal of the Royal Society Interface is a high impact, international journal covering interdisciplinary research at the boundary between the physical and life sciences; Notes and Records of the Royal Society is dedicated to the history of science. -
Taxonomy, Cranial Morphology, and Relationships of Parrot-Beaked Dinosaurs (Ceratopsia: Psittacosaurus)
2 Taxonomy, Cranial Morphology, and Relationships of Parrot-Beaked Dinosaurs (Ceratopsia: Psittacosaurus) PAUL C. SERENO in 1922, well-preserved fossils of the first parrot- (Coombs 1980, 1982). For many years, Osborn’s two brief beaked dinosaur were discovered in Early Cretaceous notes on P. mongoliensis (Osborn 1923, 1924) and a descrip- horizons in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. Now referred to tion of P. sinensis (Young 1958) provided most of the informa- a single species, Psittacosaurus mongoliensis, these remains tion available on psittacosaur morphology. include a growth series from hatchlings to adults. In sub- Recent Work. Sereno (1987) provided an overview of psit- sequent years, 15 species have been added to the genus tacosaur morphology. Portions of this dissertation were pub- Psittacosaurus and a second genus, Hongshanosaurus, was lished, including the description of two new species (P. meiley- recently described, all from Early Cretaceous rocks in ingensis, P. xinjiangensis; Sereno and Zhao 1988; Sereno et al. Asia. Although the second genus and about one-half of 1988), the synonomy of several poorly known species (Sereno the species attributed to Psittacosaurus are potentially in- 1990a), and an overview of the morphology of the clade Psit- valid, Psittacosaurus remains the most species-rich dino- tacosauridae (Sereno 1990b). Although most of this overview saurian genus, with interspecific variation concentrated can be found in You and Dodson (2004), reference is made in the skull and dentition. This paper reviews evidence only to the original source (Sereno 1990b). differentiating the named genera and species of psit- Russian psittacosaurs, including a partial skull first reported tacosaurs, outlines major cranial changes in a growth se- by Rozhdestvensky (1955, 1960) at Shestakovo in Siberia, be- ries from hatchling to adult in Psittacosaurus came the subject of a dissertation by Xijin Zhao under his mongoliensis, and provides evidence of two species direction.