DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2011.03588V1 [Cs.CL] 6 Nov 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2011.03588V1 [Cs.CL] 6 Nov 2020 Hostility Detection Dataset in Hindi Mohit Bhardwajy, Md Shad Akhtary, Asif Ekbalz, Amitava Das?, Tanmoy Chakrabortyy yIIIT Delhi, India. zIIT Patna, India. ?Wipro Research, India. fmohit19014,tanmoy,[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Despite Hindi being the third most spoken language in the world, and a significant presence of Hindi content on social In this paper, we present a novel hostility detection dataset in Hindi language. We collect and manually annotate ∼ 8200 media platforms, to our surprise, we were not able to find online posts. The annotated dataset covers four hostility di- any significant dataset on fake news or hate speech detec- mensions: fake news, hate speech, offensive, and defamation tion in Hindi. A survey of the literature suggest a few works posts, along with a non-hostile label. The hostile posts are related to hostile post detection in Hindi, such as (Kar et al. also considered for multi-label tags due to a significant over- 2020; Jha et al. 2020; Safi Samghabadi et al. 2020); however, lap among the hostile classes. We release this dataset as part there are two basic issues with these works - either the num- of the CONSTRAINT-2021 shared task on hostile post detec- ber of samples in the dataset are not adequate or they cater tion. to a specific dimension of the hostility only. In this paper, we present our manually annotated dataset for hostile posts 1 Introduction detection in Hindi. We collect more than ∼ 8200 online so- The COVID-19 pandemic has changed our lives forever, cial media posts and annotate them as hostile and non-hostile both online and offline. As the physical world went into posts. Furthermore, we identify four hostility dimensions for lockdown, the online world came closer than ever. Since each hostile post as fake, defamation, hate, and offensive. people are confined to their homes, they are spending way Though some of these hostile dimensions sound similar at more time on social media, chat rooms, communication the abstract-level (e.g., hate and offensive), their definitions apps, and gaming servers, which can have serious impli- are different, and we define them below following (Mathur cations on the mental health on an individual as well. Ac- et al. 2018a) and (Davidson et al. 2017). cording to a recent survey1, there has been 900% increase • Fake News: A claim or information that is verified to be in hate speech towards China and it’s people on Twitter, not true. We have included tweets belonging to click bait 200% increase in traffic on sites that promote hate speech and satire/parody categories as fake news as well. against Asians, 70% increase in hate speech among teen and kids online, and toxicity levels in gaming community has in- • Hate Speech: A post targeting a specific group of peo- creased by 40% as well. Similar trends have been observed ple based on their ethnicity, religious beliefs, geographical in non-English languages as well, and since the percent- belonging, race, etc., with malicious intentions of spread- age of non-English tweets in India2 have risen up to 50%, ing hate or encouraging violence. early detection of hostile texts in low resource languages like Hindi is of paramount importance as well. • Offensive: A post containing profanity, impolite, rude, or A significant number of online social media users post vulgar language to insult a targeted individual or group. arXiv:2011.03588v1 [cs.CL] 6 Nov 2020 harmful contents without realising that they are crossing • Defamation: A mis-information regarding an individual the line defined by the freedom-of-speech. As evident as it or group, which is destroying their reputation publicly. sounds, fake news, hate speeches, offensive remarks, etc., are extremely harmful for any civilised society, and ask for • Non-Hostile: A post with no hostility. adequate and appropriate guidelines to prevent/curb such ac- tivities. The foremost task in neutralising such activities is The dataset development is part of the CONSTRAINT- the hostile post detection, and many works have been car- 2021 shared task (con 2021). The CONSTRAINT-2021 ried out to address the issue in English (Waseem and Hovy workshop emphasizes the hostility detection on three ma- 2016; Waseem et al. 2017; Nobata et al. 2016). jor points, i.e., low-resource regional languages, detection in emergency situations, and early detection. Currently, the Copyright © 2021, Association for the Advancement of Artificial train and validation set is available with the shared task3, and Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. 1https://l1ght.com/Toxicity during coronavirus Report- we will release the test set at the end of the workshop. L1ght.pdf 2https://bit.ly/3mnXoKM 3https://constraint-shared-task-2021.github.io/ (a) Hostile Word Cloud. (b) Non-Hostile Word Cloud. Figure 1: Word clouds. 2 Related work Figure 2: Venn Diagram of Multi-Label Hindi hostility Waseem & Hovy (Waseem and Hovy 2016) considered an- dataset. Notations: [F − Fake], [O− Offensive], [H− Hate], notations for hate speech, but they did not consider other [D− Defamation], [NH− Non-hostile]. dimensions of hostile text like offensive or bullying. In an- other work, Waseem et al. (Waseem et al. 2017) discuss the user agreement and consensus in annotating bullying, ha- therefore, we adopt the idea of multi-label tagging for each rassment, offensive, and hate speeches. They showed that post. Figure 2 shows the class-wise overlaps among hostile it is easy to identify the victim of the bully quite convinc- dimensions in form of a Venn diagram4. Although it reveals ingly by the annotators, whereas there is very low consen- the relationship among for the majority cases, it is inade- sus in annotations of harassment, offensive and hate speech. quate to show the intersection between fake and hate class This may be partially because hostility can be generalized, in 2D. directed, implicit or explicit. Wijesiriwardene et al. (Wije- Some of the examples from the dataset are presented in siriwardene et al. 2020) provide a dataset of toxicity (ha- Table 1. For example, the first sentence is a factually verified rassment, offensive language, hate speech) on Twitter in En- fake news, and lies in the offensive category due to the use glish. of vulgar language, but it has an implicit hatred against reli- An example of implicit hostility in Hindi is to call some- gious minority, which might even lead to violence amongst one ‘meetha’, which literally means sweet in Hindi; how- two communities in the worst scenarios. Similarly in the ever, the intended meaning in a hostile post could be of fourth example, derogatory and vulgar language is used to- ‘fa$$ot’ - a derogatory term towards the LGBT community. wards a famous advocate alongside spreading misinforma- Among other notable works on hostility detection, David- tion to defame him. son et al. (Davidson et al. 2017) studied the hate speech de- tection for English. They argued that some words may re- Data Collection flect hate in one region; however, the same word can be used as a frequent slang term. For example, in English, the term We collect ∼ 8200 hostile and non-hostile texts from various ‘dog’ does not reveal any hate or offense, but it (ku##a) is social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, commonly referred to as a derogatory term in Hindi. etc. We follow different strategies to collect data for each Considering the severity of the problem, some effort category. has been made for non-English languages as well, such • For fake news collection, we refer to some of India’s as Arabic (Haddad et al. 2020), Bengali (Hossain et al. top most fact checking websites like BoomLive 5, Dainik 2020), Hindi (Jha et al. 2020), etc. Samghabadi et al. Bhaskar 6, etc, and read numerous articles in Hindi. This (Safi Samghabadi et al. 2020) addressed the problem of process helps us identify the topics of the fake news. Sub- aggression and misogyny detection in English, Hindi, and sequently, we compile a topic-wise keyword list for each Bengali, whereas, Jha et al. (Jha et al. 2020) worked on fake news. Next, we curate online social media platforms the keyword-based (swear words) offensive text detection in such as Twitter, Instagram, etc., for the collection of posts. Hindi. There are also a few attempts at Hindi-English code- mixed hate speech (Bohra et al. 2018) and offensive post • For hate speech collection, at first, we target the tweets en- (Mathur et al. 2018b) detection. Recently, Kar et al. (Kar couraging violence against minorities based on their race, et al. 2020) developed a multi-lingual COVID-19 rumour religious beliefs, etc. Following this process, we analyse detection dataset in English, Hindi, and Bangla; however, the timelines of users with significant hate-related posts. the dataset is significantly small and is limited to COVID- Additionally, we also analyse users who liked or com- related text only. mented in support of the hate speech and scan their time- lines for additional hate-related posts as well. 3 Data Development 4https://www.meta-chart.com/venn During the development of the dataset, we observe that some 5https://hindi.boomlive.in/fake-news of the posts have overlap among the hostility dimensions; 6https://www.bhaskar.com/no-fake-news/ Table 1: A few annotated examples from the dataset. • For offensive posts, we employ the list of top swear words Hotile posts Non-hostile used in Hindi language as determined by Jha et al. (Jha Fake Hate Offense Defame Total∗ 7 et al. 2020). For each swear word, we query Twitter API Train 1144 792 742 564 2678 3050 to extract (offensive) tweets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conflict, Arousal, and Logical Gut Feelings
    CONFLICT, AROUSAL, AND LOGICAL GUT FEELINGS Wim De Neys1, 2, 3 1 ‐ CNRS, Unité 3521 LaPsyDÉ, France 2 ‐ Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Unité 3521 LaPsyDÉ, France 3 ‐ Université de Caen Basse‐Normandie, Unité 3521 LaPsyDÉ, France Mailing address: Wim De Neys LaPsyDÉ (Unité CNRS 3521, Université Paris Descartes) Sorbonne - Labo A. Binet 46, rue Saint Jacques 75005 Paris France [email protected] ABSTRACT Although human reasoning is often biased by intuitive heuristics, recent studies on conflict detection during thinking suggest that adult reasoners detect the biased nature of their judgments. Despite their illogical response, adults seem to demonstrate a remarkable sensitivity to possible conflict between their heuristic judgment and logical or probabilistic norms. In this chapter I review the core findings and try to clarify why it makes sense to conceive this logical sensitivity as an intuitive gut feeling. CONFLICT, AROUSAL, AND LOGICAL GUT FEELINGS Imagine you’re on a game show. The host shows you two metal boxes that are both filled with $100 and $1 dollar bills. You get to draw one note out of one of the boxes. Whatever note you draw is yours to keep. The host tells you that box A contains a total of 10 bills, one of which is a $100 note. He also informs you that Box B contains 1000 bills and 99 of these are $100 notes. So box A has got one $100 bill in it while there are 99 of them hiding in box B. Which one of the boxes should you draw from to maximize your chances of winning $100? When presented with this problem a lot of people seem to have a strong intuitive preference for Box B.
    [Show full text]
  • Panic Disorder Issue Brief
    Panic Disorder OCTOBER | 2018 Introduction Briefings such as this one are prepared in response to petitions to add new conditions to the list of qualifying conditions for the Minnesota medical cannabis program. The intention of these briefings is to present to the Commissioner of Health, to members of the Medical Cannabis Review Panel, and to interested members of the public scientific studies of cannabis products as therapy for the petitioned condition. Brief information on the condition and its current treatment is provided to help give context to the studies. The primary focus is on clinical trials and observational studies, but for many conditions there are few of these. A selection of articles on pre-clinical studies (typically laboratory and animal model studies) will be included, especially if there are few clinical trials or observational studies. Though interpretation of surveys is usually difficult because it is unclear whether responders represent the population of interest and because of unknown validity of responses, when published in peer-reviewed journals surveys will be included for completeness. When found, published recommendations or opinions of national organizations medical organizations will be included. Searches for published clinical trials and observational studies are performed using the National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database using key words appropriate for the petitioned condition. Articles that appeared to be results of clinical trials, observational studies, or review articles of such studies, were accessed for examination. References in the articles were studied to identify additional articles that were not found on the initial search. This continued in an iterative fashion until no additional relevant articles were found.
    [Show full text]
  • About Emotions There Are 8 Primary Emotions. You Are Born with These
    About Emotions There are 8 primary emotions. You are born with these emotions wired into your brain. That wiring causes your body to react in certain ways and for you to have certain urges when the emotion arises. Here is a list of primary emotions: Eight Primary Emotions Anger: fury, outrage, wrath, irritability, hostility, resentment and violence. Sadness: grief, sorrow, gloom, melancholy, despair, loneliness, and depression. Fear: anxiety, apprehension, nervousness, dread, fright, and panic. Joy: enjoyment, happiness, relief, bliss, delight, pride, thrill, and ecstasy. Interest: acceptance, friendliness, trust, kindness, affection, love, and devotion. Surprise: shock, astonishment, amazement, astound, and wonder. Disgust: contempt, disdain, scorn, aversion, distaste, and revulsion. Shame: guilt, embarrassment, chagrin, remorse, regret, and contrition. All other emotions are made up by combining these basic 8 emotions. Sometimes we have secondary emotions, an emotional reaction to an emotion. We learn these. Some examples of these are: o Feeling shame when you get angry. o Feeling angry when you have a shame response (e.g., hurt feelings). o Feeling fear when you get angry (maybe you’ve been punished for anger). There are many more. These are NOT wired into our bodies and brains, but are learned from our families, our culture, and others. When you have a secondary emotion, the key is to figure out what the primary emotion, the feeling at the root of your reaction is, so that you can take an action that is most helpful. .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 December 19, 2019 the Psychology of Online Political Hostility
    The Psychology of Online Political Hostility: A Comprehensive, Cross-National Test of the Mismatch Hypothesis Alexander Bor* & Michael Bang Petersen Department of Political Science Aarhus University August 30, 2021 Please cite the final version of this paper published in the American Political Science Review at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885. Abstract Why are online discussions about politics more hostile than offline discussions? A popular answer argues that human psychology is tailored for face-to-face interaction and people’s behavior therefore changes for the worse in impersonal online discussions. We provide a theoretical formalization and empirical test of this explanation: the mismatch hypothesis. We argue that mismatches between human psychology and novel features of online environments could (a) change people’s behavior, (b) create adverse selection effects and (c) bias people’s perceptions. Across eight studies, leveraging cross-national surveys and behavioral experiments (total N=8,434), we test the mismatch hypothesis but only find evidence for limited selection effects. Instead, hostile political discussions are the result of status-driven individuals who are drawn to politics and are equally hostile both online and offline. Finally, we offer initial evidence that online discussions feel more hostile, in part, because the behavior of such individuals is more visible than offline. Acknowledgements This research has benefitted from discussions with Vin Arceneaux, Matt Levendusky, Mark Van Vugt, John Tooby, and members of the Research on Online Political Hostility (ROHP) group, among many others. We are grateful for constructive comments to workshop attendees at the Political Behavior Section of Aarhus University, at the NYU-SMAPP Lab, at the NYU Social Justice Lab, at the Hertie School, and to conference audiences at APSA 2019, HBES 2019, and ROPH 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysphoria As a Complex Emotional State and Its Role in Psychopathology
    Dysphoria as a complex emotional state and its role in psychopathology Vladan Starcevic A/Professor, University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health Sydney, Australia Objectives • Review conceptualisations of dysphoria • Present dysphoria as a transdiagnostic complex emotional state and assessment of dysphoria based on this conceptualisation What is dysphoria? • The term is derived from Greek (δύσφορος) and denotes distress that is hard to bear Dysphoria: associated with externalisation? • “Mixed affect” leading to an “affect of suspicion”1,2 1 Sandberg: Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie und Psychisch-Gerichtl Medizin 1896; 52:619-654 2 Specht G: Über den pathologischen Affekt in der chronischen Paranoia. Festschrift der Erlanger Universität, 1901 • A syndrome that always includes irritability and at least two of the following: internal tension, suspiciousness, hostility and aggressive or destructive behaviour3 3 Dayer et al: Bipolar Disord 2000; 2: 316-324 Dysphoria: associated with internalisation? • Six “dysphoric symptoms”: depressed mood, anhedonia, guilt, suicide, fatigue and anxiety1 1 Cassidy et al: Psychol Med 2000; 30:403-411 Dysphoria: a nonspecific state? • Dysphoria is a “nonspecific syndrome” and has “no particular place in a categorical diagnostic system”1; it is neglected and treated like an “orphan”1 1 Musalek et al: Psychopathol 2000; 33:209-214 • Dysphoria “can refer to many ways of feeling bad”2 2 Swann: Bipolar Disord 2000; 2:325-327 Textbook definitions: dysphoria nonspecific, mainly internalising? • “Feeling
    [Show full text]
  • Parochial Empathy Predicts Reduced Altruism and the Endorsement of Passive Harm
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 11-2017 Parochial Empathy Predicts Reduced Altruism and the Endorsement of Passive Harm Emile Bruneau University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Mina Cikara Rebecca Saxe Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Cognition and Perception Commons, Cognitive Psychology Commons, Communication Commons, Community Psychology Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, Personality and Social Contexts Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Bruneau, E., Cikara, M., & Saxe, R. (2017). Parochial Empathy Predicts Reduced Altruism and the Endorsement of Passive Harm. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8 (8), 934-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693064 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/554 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Parochial Empathy Predicts Reduced Altruism and the Endorsement of Passive Harm Abstract Empathic failures are common in hostile intergroup contexts; repairing empathy is therefore a major focus of peacebuilding efforts. However, it is unclear which aspect of empathy is most relevant to intergroup conflict. Although trait empathic concern predicts prosociality in interpersonal settings, we hypothesized that the best predictor of meaningful intergroup attitudes and behaviors might not be the general capacity for empathy (i.e., trait empathy), but the difference in empathy felt for the in-group versus the out-group, or “parochial empathy.” Specifically, we predicted that out-group empathy would inhibit intergroup harm and promote intergroup helping, whereas in-group empathy would have the opposite effect. In three intergroup contexts—Americans regarding Arabs, Hungarians regarding refugees, Greeks regarding Germans—we found support for this hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychosexual Characteristics of Vestibulodynia Couples: Partner Solicitousness and Hostility Are Associated with Pain
    418 ORIGINAL RESEARCH—PAIN Psychosexual Characteristics of Vestibulodynia Couples: Partner Solicitousness and Hostility are Associated with Pain Mylène Desrosiers, MA,* Sophie Bergeron, PhD,* Marta Meana, PhD,† Bianca Leclerc, B.Sc.,* Yitzchak M. Binik, PhD,‡ and Samir Khalifé, MD§ *Department of Sexology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; †Department of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA; ‡Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; §Jewish General Hospital—Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00705.x ABSTRACT Introduction. Provoked vestibulodynia is a prevalent yet misunderstood women’s sexual health issue. In particular, data concerning relationship characteristics and psychosexual functioning of partners of these women are scarce. Moreover, no research to date has examined the role of the partner in vestibulodynia. Aims. This study aimed to characterize and compare the psychosexual profiles of women with vestibulodynia and their partners, in addition to exploring whether partner-related variables correlated with women’s pain and associ- ated psychosexual functioning. Methods. Forty-three couples in which the woman suffered from vestibulodynia completed self-report question- naires focusing on their sexual functioning, dyadic adjustment, and psychological adjustment. Women were diagnosed using the cotton-swab test during a standardized gynecological examination. They also took part in a structured interview during which they were asked about their pain during intercourse and frequency of intercourse. They also completed a questionnaire about their perceptions of their partners’ responses to the pain. Main Outcome Measures. Dependent measures for both members of the couple included the Sexual History Form, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Treatment of Posttraumatic Anger and Aggression: a Review
    Volume 49, Number 5, 2012 JRRDJRRD Pages 777–788 Assessment and treatment of posttraumatic anger and aggression: A review Casey T. Taft, PhD;1–2* Suzannah K. Creech, PhD;1,3 Lorig Kachadourian, PhD1–2 1National Center for PTSD, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA; 2Boston Uni- versity School of Medicine, Boston, MA; 3Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI; and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI Abstract—The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and hyperarousal and are increasingly being viewed as a Department of Defense’s (DOD) recently published and updated defining feature of patients’ clinical presentations. Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense VA/ DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Post- Traumatic Stress includes irritability, severe agitation, and METHODS anger as specific symptoms that frequently co-occur with PTSD. For the first time, the guideline includes nine specific We begin by reviewing literature on the associations recommendations for the assessment and treatment of PTSD- related anger, irritability, and agitation. This article will review between PTSD and both anger and aggression. The the literature on PTSD and its association with anger and review that occurred for the update in the 2010 VA/DOD aggression. We highlight explanatory models for these associa- PTSD clinical practice guideline and additional relevant tions, factors that contribute to the occurrence of anger and literature published since that guideline review is aggression in PTSD, assessment of anger and aggression, and included. We then discuss theoretical models that have effective anger management interventions and strategies. been proposed to explain these associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shame and Guilt/Self-Blame As Predictors of Expressed Emotion in Family Members of Patients with Schizophrenia
    Psychiatry Research 196 (2012) 27–31 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Psychiatry Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres Shame and guilt/self-blame as predictors of expressed emotion in family members of patients with schizophrenia Stephanie Wasserman, Amy Weisman de Mamani ⁎, Giulia Suro University of Miami, United States article info abstract Article history: Expressed emotion (EE) is a measure of the family environment reflecting the amount of criticism and emo- Received 3 November 2010 tional over-involvement expressed by a key relative towards a family member with a disorder or impairment. Received in revised form 15 August 2011 Patients from high EE homes have a poorer illness prognosis than do patients from low EE homes. Despite Accepted 18 August 2011 EE's well-established predictive validity, questions remain regarding why some family members express high levels of EE attitudes while others do not. Based on indirect evidence from previous research, the current Keywords: study tested whether shame and guilt/self-blame about having a relative with schizophrenia serve as predic- Criticism Emotional over-involvement tors of EE. A sample of 72 family members of patients with schizophrenia completed the Five Minute Speech Self directed emotions Sample to measure EE, along with questionnaires assessing self-directed emotions. In line with the hypoth- Five Minute Speech Sample eses, higher levels of both shame and guilt/self-blame about having a relative with schizophrenia predicted Self-directed Emotions for Schizophrenia high EE. Results of the current study elucidate the EE construct and have implications for working with fam- Scale ilies of patients with schizophrenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)
    Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) (Adapted from Inouye et al., 1990) Patient’s Name: Date: Instructions: Assess the following factors. Acute Onset 1. Is there evidence of an acute change in mental status from the patient’s baseline? YES NO UNCERTAIN NOT APPLICABLE Inattention (The questions listed under this topic are repeated for each topic where applicable.) 2A. Did the patient have difficulty focusing attention (for example, being easily distractible or having difficulty keeping track of what was being said)? Not present at any time during interview Present at some time during interview, but in mild form Present at some time during interview, in marked form Uncertain 2B. (If present or abnormal) Did this behavior fluctuate during the interview (that is, tend to come and go or increase and decrease in severity)? YES NO UNCERTAIN NOT APPLICABLE 2C. (If present or abnormal) Please describe this behavior. Disorganized Thinking 3. Was the patient’s thinking disorganized or incoherent, such as rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable, switching from subject to subject? YES NO UNCERTAIN NOT APPLICABLE Altered Level of Consciousness 4. Overall, how would you rate this patient’s level of consciousness? Alert (normal) Vigilant (hyperalert, overly sensitive to environmental stimuli, startled very easily) Lethargic (drowsy, easily aroused) Stupor (difficult to arouse) Coma (unarousable) Uncertain 1 Disorientation 5. Was the patient disoriented at any time during the interview, such as thinking that he or she was somewhere other than the hospital, using the wrong bed, or misjudging the time of day? YES NO UNCERTAIN NOT APPLICABLE Memory Impairment 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Panic Disorder and Exercise Avoidance Ricardo W
    Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. 2014;36:68–75 ß 2014 Associac¸a˜ o Brasileira de Psiquiatria doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1012 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Panic disorder and exercise avoidance Ricardo W. Muotri, Ma´rcio A. Bernik Anxiety Disorders Program, Institute of Psychiatry and Department of Psychiatry, Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo (USP), Sa˜o Paulo, SP, Brazil. Objectives: 1) To identify whether patients with panic disorder in general and those with the respiratory subtype in particular actively avoid exercise; 2) to investigate physiological differences in cardiopulmonary function parameters in patients with panic disorder in general, patients with the respiratory subtype of panic disorder, and healthy controls upon exercise challenge. Methods: Patients with panic disorder were classified as having either the respiratory or the non- respiratory subtype. Both groups were compared to controls in terms of exercise avoidance patterns and performance on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Results: Patients with panic disorder exhibited higher exercise avoidance scores and worse performance on cardiopulmonary exercise testing as compared with controls. No differences were found between patients with the respiratory and non-respiratory subtypes. Conclusions: Exercise avoidance is present in panic disorder and is associated with poorer performance on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. These findings are not limited to patients with the respiratory subtype of the disorder. Keywords: Anxiety disorders; exercise test; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; panic attack; physical exercise Introduction with PD and depression is an autonomic dysfunction, in which a dominance of sympathetic over vagal control of Fear of a heart attack is a major concern among patients heart rate might lead to arrhythmia and sudden death.6 with panic disorder (PD).
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Mental Health Disorder Fact Sheet for the Classroom
    1 Children’s Mental Health Disorder Fact Sheet for the Classroom1 Disorder Symptoms or Behaviors About the Disorder Educational Implications Instructional Strategies and Classroom Accommodations Anxiety Frequent Absences All children feel anxious at times. Many feel stress, for example, when Students are easily frustrated and may Allow students to contract a flexible deadline for Refusal to join in social activities separated from parents; others fear the dark. Some though suffer enough have difficulty completing work. They worrisome assignments. Isolating behavior to interfere with their daily activities. Anxious students may lose friends may suffer from perfectionism and take Have the student check with the teacher or have the teacher Many physical complaints and be left out of social activities. Because they are quiet and compliant, much longer to complete work. Or they check with the student to make sure that assignments have Excessive worry about homework/grades the signs are often missed. They commonly experience academic failure may simply refuse to begin out of fear been written down correctly. Many teachers will choose to Frequent bouts of tears and low self-esteem. that they won’t be able to do anything initial an assignment notebook to indicate that information Fear of new situations right. Their fears of being embarrassed, is correct. Drug or alcohol abuse As many as 1 in 10 young people suffer from an AD. About 50% with humiliated, or failing may result in Consider modifying or adapting the curriculum to better AD also have a second AD or other behavioral disorder (e.g. school avoidance. Getting behind in their suit the student’s learning style-this may lessen his/her depression).
    [Show full text]