DOCSLIB.ORG

(President) (In the Chair) ……………………… Held I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(President) (In the Chair) ……………………… Held I GMB CONGRESS 2016 ……………………. SIS. MARY TURNER MBE (President) (In the Chair) ……………………… Held in: Bournemouth International Centre, Bournemouth on: Sunday, 5th June 2016 Monday, 6th June 2016 Tuesday, 7th June 2016 (Sectional Conferences) Wednesday, 8th June 2016 and Thursday, 9th June 2016 ………………………….. PROCEEDINGS DAY TWO (Monday, 6th June 2016) …………………………. (Transcript prepared by: Marten Walsh Cherer Limited, 1st Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP. Telephone: 020 7067 2900 email: [email protected]) ………………………………… 1 SECOND DAY’S PROCEEDINGS MONDAY, 6TH JUNE 2016 MORNING SESSION (Congress assembled at 9.30 a.m.) THE PRESIDENT: Will Congress come to order, please? I hope you are all bright- eyed and bushy-tailed this morning! Did you enjoy yourselves last night? (Confirmed) I am sorry you were late leaving but it was worth it in the end, wasn‘t it? That is my excuse and I am sticking to it! Right, good morning all and I saw many on the dance floor, even I attempted it but I was tired. I enjoyed it and thank you all for showing up. I have a couple of announcements to make. First of all, I have been joined on the platform by Lisa Johnson, our newly appointed Director of External Affairs – I do not know what affairs – and Training. Lisa, welcome. (Applause) I have been asked by Friends of Dementia to make sure that you all sign up. I have an appeal from the RMA: ―Mary, can you please announce that raffle tickets for the RMA can be obtained from the RMA stall and also if any region would like to donate a raffle prize this would be appreciated. Thank you. Jan Smith.‖ Okay, that is that one. I do have also an apology from Jeremy Corbyn. He asked me to tell the Camell Laird workers that he had not forgotten about them. It was only later on he remembered he had not mentioned them but he will keep the fight up on your behalf as well as for the others, the miners and so on. (Applause) He did not stay last night because he had been travelling for three days and he just wanted to get home, but we really did appreciate him coming and giving up that time. Thank you for all being so well behaved. It is not often you are well behaved but you were well behaved yesterday. Let‘s move into the business of the morning and that is, I will now be calling Motion 172, Yorkshire, 173, London, 174, Yorkshire, 176, London, 177, Wales & South Western Region. Will those movers and seconders please come to the front? Then I will be asking Dave Clements, on behalf of the CEC, to speak on the qualifications. Okay. POLITICAL: THE LABOUR PARTY HANDS OFF CORBYN MOTION 172 172. HANDS OFF CORBYN This Conference welcomes the election of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader. We note that he was elected by an overwhelming majority of Party members and supporters. We therefore consider that it is the duty of all Party members inside and outside the Houses of Parliament to support him. We condemn the campaign of vilification in the Tory media directed against Jeremy Corbyn, which is aimed at undermining and removing him. We furthermore deplore the actions of members of the Parliamentary Labour Party who, through their systematic attempts to 2 undermine Jeremy Corbyn, are deliberately sabotaging the work of the opposition, destabilising the Labour Party and playing into the hands of the Tories. We call upon our representatives in Parliament to provide us with a clear and unambiguous commitment not to participate in any such activities and to support the elected leader of the Party In the event of a refusal to provide such an undertaking, we will have no alternative but to move a vote of no confidence and set in motion a process of selecting somebody who is prepared to respect the democratic views of the membership. RIPON & THIRSK GENERAL BRANCH Yorkshire & North Derbyshire Region (Carried) THE PRESIDENT: You are bright-eyed and bushy-tailed this morning! Before you start, our colleague here is the convenor of Nestle and that is his present to all of you on your tables this morning. (Applause) Next it will be the Scottish Brewery! Okay, colleague. BRO. B. GOLDING (Yorkshire & North Derbyshire): (Cheers) I would just like to respond to what a delegate said yesterday about Nestle being evil. We have 8,000 people employed directly by Nestle in the UK and Ireland, many of them are GMB members right across the sites, we are Fair Trade, and we are a Living Wage employer. I would like people to be careful what they say about some of the companies our members work in, please. (Applause) Yesterday we heard Jeremy extolling what we want from a Labour Party leader, socialism and justice. Unfortunately, we do not get this from all in our Parliamentary Labour Party. We have collaborators with the Tories attacking the leadership at every opportunity. This must stop. If they continue, we must deselect them. I move. (Applause) BRO. G. JARVIS (Yorkshire & North Derbyshire): (Cheers) President, Congress, at last year‘s conference when Jeremy Corbyn was seeking support for his leadership campaign our Regional Secretary at the time, now our General Secretary, was the first to offer support. During the speeches and debates with the other candidates, Jeremy won over the vast majority of delegates whose allegiance was turned from the candidate the GMB was publicly backing at the time. After his resounding victory, the GMB finally climbed down off the fence to offer him their support much to the delight of many in our region, and beyond. But, empty words are meaningless. Actions speak much louder and action is what is required from us if we are to defend Jeremy in the next period. This Congress does indeed welcome the election of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Leader, that he was elected with an overwhelming majority, and that is the duty of all party members, inside and outside the House of Parliament, to support him. Attacks in the press are to be expected although not deserved but attacks from Labour MPs are totally unacceptable. (Applause) We must not be afraid to condemn those who do so. This motion sets out the detail of what that support should be. The message is clear, support our leader or get out. I second. (Applause) 3 THE PRESIDENT: Well done, Graham. 173, London. THE LABOUR PARTY MOTION 173 173. THE LABOUR PARTY This Congress congratulates Jeremy Corbyn on his success in rebuilding confidence in the Labour Party. Congress also resolves to give him the full support of the GMB in future, as have other major unions. GMB recognises that he represents the aspirations of the working class within the Party and is a sincere and long-standing supporter of trade unions. LOWESTOFT BRANCH London Region (Carried) BRO. G. DOUCE (London): President, Congress, colleagues, we heard from Jeremy Corbyn yesterday and I am sure you will agree that he has a refreshing approach in politics, he answers the question he is asked. That much was evident when we heard from him last year at the leadership hustings in Dublin. His leadership, however, has seen significant attacks from some quarters of the press and reports of attack from some within the Party and the wider labour Movement. I say reports because I have seen articles claiming that prominent Labour politicians have attacked Jeremy in a TV interview. I watched the interview on the iPlayer and I was pleased to see that the politician actually stuck to his brief, spoke about his election, his remit, and his proposals. He acted with professionalism, in my view, just what I suggest we would all expect from a GMB member who was recently elected as the Mayor of London. Thank you, Sadiq. Generally, there seems to be renewed confidence that the leadership of the Labour Party is becoming more in tune with ordinary working people like you and me rather than risking becoming out of touch but not quite as out of touch as the current so- called government. Therefore, colleagues, I call on you to support this motion subject to the CEC qualification. Our policies and priorities are front and centre in the minds of the current party leadership and as we were reminded yesterday by our CEC colleague from Southern Region, our President Mary will keep prompting them about their obligations to stand up for our policies and to help us stand up for our members. Colleagues, there are times at which individuals or organisations may disagree with their leadership but there is a time and place for debate. If what some people wish to do is openly attack a democratically elected leader, I would say to them, work constructively and collaboratively with the leader and any affiliated organisations such as ourselves. We all know what happened to those who disagreed so fundamentally with the Party, they went off and formed the SDP. Their experiment failed and they just ended up propping up the Tories for five years and then returned to irrelevance. By working together, colleagues, we can realise our shared goals and as the banner on the side there says, In Unity there is Strength. Colleagues, let‘s stand together and 4 fight our common enemy, and that is Dodgy Dave and his double-dealing chums. I move. (Applause) THE PRESIDENT: Well done, Gareth. Seconder. SIS. A. COUSIN (London): Seconding Motion 173. President, Congress, finally we have a Labour leader who will further the interests of working people, not suck up to big business, celebrities, and Murdoch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich
    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations
    The University of Manchester Research Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Barclay, A., Sobolewska, M., & Ford, R. (2019). Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations. Electoral Studies, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Published in: Electoral Studies Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations. Andrew Barclay School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Maria Sobolewska School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Robert Ford School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Manuscript accepted for publication by Electoral Studies How to cite: Barclay, Andrew. Sobolewska, Maria. & Ford, Robert (2019) “Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations” Electoral Studies, 61 1 Political realignment of British Jews: testing competing explanations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Diary 2015–16
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2015–16 18 May 2015 to 12 May 2016 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2015–16, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes, unless stated otherwise (and are not itemised in the analysis). (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14j of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 7. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Previous Council Meeting PDF 298 KB
    Agenda Item 3 Minutes of the Meeting of the Council of the City of Sheffield held in the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Pinstone Street, Sheffield S1 2HH, on Wednesday 2 October 2013, at 2.00 pm, pursuant to notice duly given and Summonses duly served. PRESENT THE LORD MAYOR (Councillor Vickie Priestley) THE DEPUTY LORD MAYOR (Councillor Peter Rippon) 1 Arbourthorne Ward 10 Dore & Totley Ward 19 Mosborough Ward Julie Dore Joe Otten David Barker Jack Scott Colin Ross Isobel Bowler Tony Downing 2 Beauchief & Greenhill Ward 11 East Ecclesfield Ward 20 Nether Edge Ward Simon Clement-Jones Garry Weatherall Nikki Bond Roy Munn Steve Wilson Anders Hanson Clive Skelton Joyce Wright Qurban Hussain 3 Beighton Ward 12 Ecclesall Ward 21 Richmond Ward Helen Mirfin-Boukouris Penny Baker John Campbell Chris Rosling-Josephs Roger Davison Martin Lawton Ian Saunders Diana Stimely Lynn Rooney 4 Birley Ward 13 Firth Park Ward 22 Shiregreen & Brightside Ward Denise Fox Sheila Constance Peter Price Bryan Lodge Alan Law Sioned-Mair Richards Karen McGowan Chris Weldon Peter Rippon 5 Broomhill Ward 14 Fulwood Ward 23 Southey Ward Jayne Dunn Sue Alston Leigh Bramall Shaffaq Mohammed Andrew Sangar Tony Damms Stuart Wattam Cliff Woodcraft Gill Furniss 6 Burngreave Ward 15 Gleadless Valley Ward 24 Stannington Ward Jackie Drayton Steve Jones David Baker Ibrar Hussain Cate McDonald Katie Condliffe Talib Hussain Tim Rippon Vickie Priestley 7 Central Ward 16 Graves Park Ward 25 Stockbridge & Upper Don Ward Jillian Creasy Ian Auckland Richard Crowther Mohammad Maroof Bob McCann Philip Wood Robert Murphy Denise Reaney 8 Crookes Ward 17 Hillsborough Ward 26 Walkey Ward Geoff Smith Janet Bragg Ben Curran Bob Johnson Neale Gibson George Lindars-Hammond Nikki Sharpe 9 Darnall Ward 18 Manor Castle Ward 27 West Ecclesfield Ward Harry Harpham Jenny Armstrong Trevor Bagshaw Mazher Iqbal Terry Fox Adam Hurst Mary Lea Pat Midgley Alf Meade 28 Woodhouse Ward Mick Rooney Jackie Satur Ray Satur Page 5 Page 6 Council 2.10.2013 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis Ebook Edition Published by Verso 2019
    anti-semitism and the labour party Anti-Semitism and the Labour Party Edited by Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis ebook edition published by Verso 2019 All rights reserved Te moral rights of the authors have been asserted Verso UK: 6 Meard St, London, W1F 0EG US: 20 Jay St, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201 versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Lef Books ISBN-13: 978-1-78960-671-3 ‘Corbyn Under Fire’ and ‘Te Never Ending Story’, © Daniel Finn 2018, frst appeared in Jacobin. ‘Jeremy Corbyn is an Anti-Racist, Not an Anti-Semite’ © Jospehn Finlay, 2019, frst appeared in Times of Israel. 'Smoke Without Fire: Te Myth of the 'Labour Antisemitism Crisis’ © Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison, 2019. ‘Te Chimera of British Anti-Semitism (and How Not to Fight It if it Were Real)’, frst appeared on Verso Blog © Norman Finkelstein, 2019; ’60 Times Jeremy Corbyn Stood with Jewish People’ © @ToryFibs; ‘Briefng for Canvassers: Challenging false allegations of antisemitism’ and ‘Te Riverside Scandal’ with permission from Jewish Voice for Labour; ‘A Disinformation Campaign’ © Media Reform Coalition, 2019; ‘Te Fake News Nazi: Corbyn, Williamson and the Anti-Semitism Scandal’ from Medians © David Edwards, 2019; ‘Is the Guardian Institutionally Antisemitic?’ and ‘Labour Party Conference or Nuremberg Rally? Assessing the Evidence’ from author’s blog, © Jamie Stern-Weiner 2019; ‘Hue and Cry over the UCU’ © Richard Kuper 2019; with permission of OpenDemocracy; ‘Why the Labour Party Should Not Adopt the IHRA Defnition or Any Other Defnition of Antisemitism’ from author’s
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Committee Formal Minutes Session 2017–19
    House of Commons Defence Committee Formal Minutes Session 2017-19 TUESDAY 12 SEPTEMBER2017 Members present: Rt Hon Dr JulianLewis, in the Chair1 Leo Docherty Gavin Robinson Martin Docherty-Hughes Ruth Smeeth Rt Hon Mark Francois Rt Hon John Spellar Graham P Jones Phil Wilson 1. Declaration of interests Members declared their interests, in accordance with the Resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 ( see Appendix). 2. Committee working methods The Committee considered this matter. Ordered, That the public be admitted during the examination of witnesses unless the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That the Committee examine witnesses in public, except where it otherwise orders. Resolved, That witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That the Committee shall not consider individual cases. Ordered, That John Spellar take the Chair of the Committee, if present, in the absence ofthe Chair. 3. F-35 Procurement The Committee considered this matter. 4. Future programme The Committee considered this matter. 5. Oral evidence: F-35 Procurement Deborah Haynes, Defence Editor, The Times, Alexi Mostrous, Head of Investigations, The Times and Justin Bronk, Research Fellow, RUSI, gave oral evidence. In the absence of the Chair, Mr John Spellar was called to the chair. Justin Bronk, Research Fellow, RUSI, gave further oral evidence. [Adjourned until Wednesday 13 September at 2:30pm. 1Electedbythe House (Standing Order No. 122B ) 12 July 201 7, see Votes and Proceedings 12 July201 7 TUESDAY 7NOVEMBER2017 Members present: Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis, in the Chair Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois Rt Hon John Spellar Ruth Smeeth Phil Wtl.son I.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 0.71
    Thursday Volume 607 24 March 2016 No. 139 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 24 March 2016 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2016 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1733 24 MARCH 2016 1734 Colleen Fletcher: The Competition and Markets House of Commons Authority’s proposal regarding a safeguard price control for prepayment customers is welcome and will go some Thursday 24 March 2016 way towards redressing an inherent unfairness that affects the most vulnerable people, but the authority and the Government should go much further. Will the Secretary The House met at half-past Nine o’clock of State commit to ensuring that prepayment customers are prioritised during the smart meter roll-out? PRAYERS Amber Rudd: I share the hon. Lady’s support for the CMA’s proposal for the most vulnerable customers, a [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] larger proportion of whom are on prepayment meters, and we welcome that approach to ensure that we look after those people. On smart meters, while some energy BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS companies are prioritising prepayment meters, we are not obliging them to do so because the roll-out of smart NEW WRITS meters is so inherently important to managing people’s Ordered, bills. That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the Crown to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to Liz McInnes: Will the Secretary of State tell the serve in this
    [Show full text]
  • The Corbyn Years
    The Corbyn years John Booth Left Out: The Inside Story of Labour Under Corbyn Gabriel Pogrund and Patrick Maguire London: The Bodley Head, 2020, £18.99 This Land: The Story of a Movement Owen Jones London: Allen Lane, 2020, £20.00 When back in 2015 newly elected Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was first hit by critical abuse, Benjamin Netanyahu had just warned President Barack Obama of the power of the friends of Israel in Washington DC.1 Hundreds of members of the US Congress afforded Israel’s prime minister repeated standing ovations for assertively undermining their president’s Iran nuclear deal.2 Anyone with a weather eye to the West could forecast what was to descend on the peace-campaigning MP for Islington North. If the US President could be so vilified a mile from the White House, what chance had a life-long critic of US foreign policy – his children’s Chilean-born mother was a refugee from the Kissinger-backed Pinochet coup – who had landed the task of leading a party of diminished and largely demoralised members after two general election defeats?3 This perspective is not one embraced by the authors of these two books on Corbyn’s travails. It’s disappointing as Left Out joint author Gabriel Pogrund enjoyed a Laurence Stern journalism fellowship (now the Stern- 1 <https://tinyurl.com/nsvwssf> or <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/ wp/2015/03/03/full-text-netanyahus-address-to-congress/> 2 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KMVhb57RqI&> 3 <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/> <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/results> <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2017/results> Bryan fellowship) at The Washington Post.4 In my experience of working at the Post in DC it’s hard not to be aware of the powerful influence of Israel’s supporters in US politics and journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill
    1 House of Commons Wednesday 24 October 2018 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE New Amendments handed in are marked thus Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance Amendments tabled since the last publication: 23 and 24 NORTHERN IRELAND (EXECUTIVE FORMATION AND EXERCISE OF FUNCTIONS) BILL NOTE This document includes all amendments tabled to date and includes any withdrawn amendments at the end. The amendments have been arranged in the order in which they relate to the Bill. Nigel Mills 15 Clause 1,page1, line 16, at end insert— “(4A) If the period mentioned in section 16(A)(3) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, as modified by subsection (1), ends without the Ministerial offices having been filled section 32 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 has effect as if for subsection (3) there were substituted— “(3) The Secretary of State shall within 7 calendar days of the end of the period mentioned in in section 16(A)(3) set a date for the poll for the election of the next Northern Ireland Assembly. The date set shall be no later than 3 calendar months after the end of the period mentioned in section 16(A)(3).” Member’s explanatory statement This amendment would require elections in Northern Ireland to be called if Ministerial offices are not filled by 26 March 2019. 2 Committee of the whole House: 24 October 2018 Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill, continued Dr Andrew Murrison 1 Clause 2,page2, line 20, leave out paragraph (b) Member’s explanatory statement This amendment would prevent the Secretary of State from extending the deadline for appointment of Northern Ireland Ministers without the approval of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold Man of Europe – 2015
    COLD MAN OF EUROPE 2015 UPDATE October 2015 Westgate House 2a Prebend Street London N1 8PT 020 7359 8000 [email protected] The Cold Man of Europe – 2015 How the UK’s housing performs against comparable European countries in terms of fuel poverty and energy efficiency. Written by Pedro Guertler, Jack Carrington and Antonia Jansz Summary This briefing compares the state of the UK housing stock and fuel poverty levels with 15 other European countries. It concludes that no other country of the 16 assessed performed as poorly overall as the UK across the range of indicators. The UK has among the highest rates of fuel poverty and one of the most energy inefficient housing stocks in Europe. Despite the fact that it has amongst the lowest energy prices, the UK ranks very poorly in terms of the affordability of space heating and fuel poverty, ranking 14th out of 16 on both indicators. It is the poor state of our housing stock that is the main cause of these problems. In terms of households reporting that their home is in a poor state of repair, the UK ranks 12th out of 16. In terms of energy efficiency, out of 11 countries for which data is available, the UK’s walls are ranked 7th, roofs are ranked 8th, floors are ranked 10th and windows are ranked 11th. The key results are shown in Table 1 below. The latest official European data are used for this briefing, and the UK’s performance compared to a previous assessment two years ago1. 1 http://www.ukace.org/2013/03/fact-file-the-cold-man-of-europe/ Association for the Conservation of Energy | briefing
    [Show full text]
  • Corbyn Disciplinary Letter.Key
    ) [email protected] x +44 (0)330 822 0321 = www.antisemitism.uk Tom Watson MP Deputy Leader Labour Party By e-mail only 23rd September 2016 Dear Mr Watson, We are writing to you pursuant to Chapter 1, Clause IX (2) (B) of the Labour Party’s Rule Book to complain about the conduct of Jeremy Corbyn. We request that you present our disciplinary complaint to the Party’s National Executive Committee, for consideration by the Party’s National Constitutional Committee. We charge that Mr Corbyn has breached the Party’s Conditions of Membership as set out in Chapter 2, Clause I (8) of the Party’s Rule Book by committing acts that are grossly detrimental to the Party, namely characterising Jewish people as dissembling and dishonest in their reporting of antisemitism, and by using the influence and prestige of his office to disseminate and normalise that lie, contrary to Chapter I, Clause IV (2) (B) of the Party’s Constitutional Rules, as contained in the Party’s Rule Book. The allegation that Jews lie and deceive in order to further hidden agendas is an age-old antisemitic trope. It has now been manifestly deployed by Mr Corbyn in his leadership campaign video. It falls under the definition of antisemitism used by decent nations around the world — including our own — by “making mendacious...allegations about Jews”. The definition can be found on our website at www.antisemitism.uk/definition. Although Mr Corbyn and his allies have a long history of association with antisemites, it was not until 5th April this year that he crossed the line and made an antisemitic statement.
    [Show full text]