Deploying DNS and Sendmail
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Letter to the FCC [PDF]
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Part 0, 1, 2, 15 and 18 of the ) ET Docket No. 15170 Commission’s Rules regarding Authorization ) Of Radio frequency Equipment ) ) Request for the Allowance of Optional ) RM11673 Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices ) Summary The rules laid out in ET Docket No. 15170 should not go into effect as written. They would cause more harm than good and risk a significant overreach of the Commission’s authority. Specifically, the rules would limit the ability to upgrade or replace firmware in commercial, offtheshelf home or smallbusiness routers. This would damage the compliance, security, reliability and functionality of home and business networks. It would also restrict innovation and research into new networking technologies. We present an alternate proposal that better meets the goals of the FCC, not only ensuring the desired operation of the RF portion of a WiFi router within the mandated parameters, but also assisting in the FCC’s broader goals of increasing consumer choice, fostering competition, protecting infrastructure, and increasing resiliency to communication disruptions. If the Commission does not intend to prohibit the upgrade or replacement of firmware in WiFi devices, the undersigned would welcome a clear statement of that intent. Introduction We recommend the FCC pursue an alternative path to ensuring Radio Frequency (RF) compliance from WiFi equipment. We understand there are significant concerns regarding existing users of the WiFi spectrum, and a desire to avoid uncontrolled change. However, we most strenuously advise against prohibiting changes to firmware of devices containing radio components, and furthermore advise against allowing nonupdatable devices into the field. -
Setting up a Dial in PPP Server for Use with NX1500 Series Nexion Data Modems
Setting up a Dial In PPP Server for use with NX1500 series Nexion Data modems. A Linux server can provide many network services and all of these can be accessed by users via a dial up connection. Such services might include Email, Instant Messaging, BBS File Sharing and Internet access. This document applies to Red Hat Linux 7.3 and details only PPP Dial In setup. It requires Mgetty and PPPd to be installed – PPPd is installed by default. Mgetty. Installation To see if Mgetty is installed, run GnoRPM and click Find. Select Match Label from the list and enter mgetty. Click find. No result means Mgetty is not installed. Close the find window. To install, insert the Red Hat CD, mount it by right clicking the desktop and choosing Disks, CD-ROM. Click the Install button in GnoRPM, find Mgetty in the list and install by following the prompts etc. Unmount the drive the same way it was mounted. Mgetty must be run against each port to be monitored for dial in. To run Mgetty on COM 1, the command would be /sbin/mgetty –D ttyS0 where –D forces data mode (deny fax) and ttyS0 = COM 1. (ttyS1 is equivalent to COM 2). Most commonly the Mgetty command is added to /etc/inittab so it is automatically executed at startup and is also re-executed each time the process is terminated (modem hang up). For a modem on COM 1, add the following line to /etc/inittab: S0:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty –D ttyS0 The starting ‘S0’ is an arbitrary reference and can be any unique set of characters. -
Site Finder and Internet Governance
345 Site Finder and Internet Governance Jonathan Weinberg* 347 INTRODUCTION 348 PART 1. 354 PART 2. 361 PART 3. 366 PART 4. 375 CONCLUSION Copyright © 2004 by Jonathan Weinberg. * Professor of Law, Wayne State University. I am grateful to Michael Froomkin, Mark Lemley, David Maher, Milton Mueller, and Jessica Litman for their comments, and to Susan Crawford and Bret Fausett for answer- ing questions along the way. None of them, of course, is responsible for anything I say here. This essay reflects developments taking place through 30 November 2003. 347 Site Finder and Internet Governance Jonathan Weinberg INTRODUCTION ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2003, VeriSign, Inc.—the company that operates the data- bases that allow internet users to reach any internet resource ending in “.com” or “.net”—introduced a new service it called Site Finder. Less than three weeks later, after widespread protest from the technical community, at least three law- suits, and a stern demand from ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which has undertaken responsibility for managing the internet domain name space), VeriSign agreed to shut Site Finder down.1 In between those dates the internet community saw a passionate debate over the roles of ICANN, VeriSign, and the internet’s technical aristocracy in managing the domain name space. VeriSign has charged that its opponents’ reactions were the product of “obsolete thinking” that would disable it from “build[ing] a commercial busi- ness.”2 ICANN, for its part, is seeking to enact a procedure under which top-level domain name registry operators such as VeriSign must seek ICANN’s approval before offering new services or taking any “significant actions that...could affect the operational stability, reliability, security or global interoperability of...the Internet.”3 Some see fault on all sides: “It’s hard to say,” writes one commenta- tor, “in this case who is being more anti-competitive, ICANN or VeriSign.”4 In this essay, I will try to unpack the Site Finder story. -
To the Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee: We, The
To the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee: We, the undersigned, have played various parts in building a network called the Internet. We wrote and debugged the software; we defined the standards and protocols that talk over that network. Many of us invented parts of it. We're just a little proud of the social and economic benefits that our project, the Internet, has brought with it. We are writing to oppose the Committee's proposed new Internet censorship and copyright bill. If enacted, this legislation will risk fragmenting the Internet's global domain name system (DNS ), create an environment of tremendous fear and uncertainty for technological innovation, and seriously harm the credibility of the United States in its role as a steward of key Internet infrastructure. In exchange for this, the bill will introduce censorship that will simultaneously be circumvented by deliberate infringers while hampering innocent parties' ability to communicate. All censorship schemes impact speech beyond the category they were intended to restrict, but this bill will be particularly egregious in that regard because it causes entire domains to vanish from the Web, not just infringing pages or files. Worse, an incredible range of useful, law-abiding sites can be blacklisted under this bill. These problems will be enough to ensure that alternative name-lookup infrastructures will come into widespread use, outside the control of US service providers but easily used by American citizens. Errors and divergences will appear between these new services and the current global DNS, and contradictory addresses will confuse browsers and frustrate the people using them. -
IDN-OSS Project
IDN-OSS Project ICANN 2004 Cape Town – IDN Workshop 1st December 2004 William Tan NeuLevel Consultant IDN and NeuLevel • NeuLevel has recognized the need for application plug-ins to realize the benefit of IDN work by any registry – Web browsers, email clients, IM, etc. • Need for a project to implement plug-ins that is – Open source, external to NeuLevel – Community controlled and developed – Standards compliant, not registry-specific 2 Chartering IDN-OSS • NeuLevel collaboration with James Seng to begin IDN-OSS – Conceived at ICANN Montreal – Discussion between Richard Tindal and James Seng • James Seng wrote business plan, kick-started the project. • Advisory Council: Vint Cerf, Mark Davis, Martin Dürst, John Klensin, and Paul Hoffman • Project is hosted by Internet Systems Consortium 3 IDN Open Source Software Project • Goals – Develop open source, standards-compliant software to enable IDN functionality in applications – Target web browser initially – Internet Explorer – Provides a bridge until IDN functionality is native to applications • Timeline – Summer 2003: Project begins – Fall 2003: ISC begins hosting project – Spring 2004: First IE plug-in released – Summer 2004: Internal code improvements 4 IDN-OSS Products • IDNTool • Performs IDNA ToASCII and ToUnicode operations. • Useful for developers, domain administrators, etc. • Uses JPNIC idnkit library internally • Plug-in for Internet Explorer • Allows users to navigate using IDN URLs – by typing into address bar or clicking on links. • New name: echIDNA • Uses JPNIC idnkit library -
H2418.1 EMC-Computer Generated Solutions E-Mail Management and E-Discovery Solution Overview
Solution Overview EMC-Computer Generated Solutions E-mail Management and E-discovery Solution The Big Picture • Saves time, money, and space on • Helps reduce help desk calls and e-mail servers because the application lessens IT time spent manually runs on a different server (no code is archiving e-mail loaded on the e-mail server) • Delivers a secure corporate e-mail sys- • Remote calls to e-mail servers allow tem that protects valuable intellectual Unlimited Mailbox to run 24 hours per property, as well as complying with day, seven days a week without any government regulatory standards impact on e-mail server performance regarding e-mail storage and retention • Supports all known e-mail platforms, • Delivers immediate time to value including Microsoft Exchange, Lotus by enabling businesses to conduct Domino, Novell GroupWise, SunOne, legal discovery in-house, minimizing and UNIX Sendmail the need for expensive outside e-discovery fees • Provides complete compatibility with double-byte character support •Lowers the total cost of ownership by reducing operational and adminis- • Reduces disk and tape storage trative costs with self-managing and required to back up mail servers and self-healing content-addressed improves the performance of the storage (CAS) backup and recovery of e-mails • Provides long-term data retention • Reduces e-mail server farm as older capabilities, so content cannot be messages are moved to stable, overwritten or changed and is kept for less-expensive media a definable period of time, ensuring •Reduces licensing fees for operating its authenticity and meeting regulatory and backup systems, maintenance requirements costs, and support communications costs A unique, flexible solution that reduces costs and provides faster, less-expensive, lower-risk e-discovery The number and size of e-mails received at any given company, any given day, is becoming increasingly difficult and costly to manage. -
Groupwise Internet Agent
GroupWise Internet Agent April 7, 2000 Novell Confidential Manual Rev 99a24 8 February 00 Legal Notices Novell, Inc. makes no representations or warranties with respect to the contents or use of this documentation, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc. reserves the right to revise this publication and to make changes to its content, at any time, without obligation to notify any person or entity of such revisions or changes. Further, Novell, Inc. makes no representations or warranties with respect to any software, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc. reserves the right to make changes to any and all parts of Novell software, at any time, without any obligation to notify any person or entity of such changes. This product may require export authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce prior to exporting from the U.S. or Canada. Copyright © 1993-1999 Novell, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, photocopied, stored on a retrieval system, or transmitted without the express written consent of the publisher. U.S. Patent Nos. 4,555,775; 4,580,218; 5,412,772; 5,701,459; 5,717,912; 5,760,772; 5,870,739; 5,873,079; 5,884,304; 5,903,755; 5,913,209; 5,924,096; 5,946,467; D393,457 and U.S. Patents Pending. Novell, Inc. 122 East 1700 South Provo, UT 84606 U.S.A. www.novell.com GroupWise Internet Agent February 2000 104-001304-001 Online Documentation: To access the online documentation for this and other Novell products, and to get updates, see www.novell.com/documentation. -
Install Sendmail Mail Server on Debian GNU / Linux
Walking in Light with Christ - Faith, Computing, Diary Articles & tips and tricks on GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, Windows, mobile phone articles, religious related texts http://www.pc-freak.net/blog Install Sendmail mail server on Debian GNU / Linux Author : admin Installing sendmail on Debian Linux is something not so common these days. As sendmail has been overshadowed by his competitors Exim and Postfix. By default Debian Linux comes with Exim (light) installed as Exim is tiny and perfectly suitable for dealing with small and mid-sized SMTP needs. The reason why sendmail has been moved out by its competitors over the last 15 years is sendmail configuration is one big hell and besides that sendmail has been well known for its many security remote exploit holes - making it a famous target for crackers. Well anyways in some cases sendmail is necessary to install especially if you have a client which wants to have it set up. In this short article I will show how very basic sendmail installation on Debian host is done. blackstar:~# apt-get install sendmail-bin sensible-mda Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: sendmail-base sendmail-cf sensible-mda Suggested packages: sendmail-doc logcheck resolvconf sasl2-bin The following packages will be REMOVED: exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light sa-exim task-mail-server The following NEW packages will be installed: sendmail-base sendmail-bin sendmail-cf 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 6 to remove and 26 not upgraded. Need to get 1,626 kB of archives. -
Comodo Antispam Gateway Software Version 1.5
Comodo Antispam Gateway Software Version 1.5 Administrator Guide Guide Version 1.5.082412 Comodo Security Solutions 525 Washington Blvd. Jersey City, NJ 07310 Comodo Antispam Gateway - Administrator Guide Table of Contents 1 Introduction to Comodo Antispam Gateway........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Release Notes............................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Purchasing License .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Adding more Users, Domains or Time to your Account .................................................................................................6 1.4 License Information................................................................................................................................................... 10 2 Getting Started................................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Incoming Filtering Configuration ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.1 Configuring Your Mail Server.................................................................................................................................. -
(GNU Mailman) Mailing Lists
Usability and efficiency improvements of the (GNU Mailman) mailing lists Rudy Borgstede ([email protected]) System and Network Engineering University of Amsterdam July 5, 2008 Versions Version Date Changes 0.0.1 18 May 2008 First setup of the report 0.0.2 9 June 2008 Release Candidate 1 of the project proposal 0.1.1 17 June 2008 A rewrite of the document because of the change of project result. The project will deliver an advice rather then a product like a patch or add-on for GNU Mailman. This means that the report becomes an consultancy report instead of a project proposal. 1.0.0 30 June 2008 Final version 1 of the report. 1.0.1 1 July 2008 A spelling check of the report. 1.0.2 5 July 2008 Extending the conclusion en future work chapters. Participants Name Contact Information University of Amsterdam Rudy Borgstede (Student) [email protected] Cees de Laat (Supervisor) [email protected] NLnet Michiel Leenaars (Supervisor) [email protected] Abstract This report is the result of a research project of four weeks at the NLnet Foundation1 in Amster- dam. The NLnet Foundation is a foundation who financially supports the open-source community and their projects. The purpose of the project is to improve the usability and the administration of the mailing lists (of the foundation) and giving a more clear view on mailing list server software to anyone who is interested in using mailing list server software or developing new mail or mail- ing list server software. The report describes the research of the usability of several open-source mailing list server software for scalable environments with several well known mail servers. -
Set up Mail Server Documentation 1.0
Set Up Mail Server Documentation 1.0 Nosy 2014 01 23 Contents 1 1 1.1......................................................1 1.2......................................................2 2 11 3 13 3.1...................................................... 13 3.2...................................................... 13 3.3...................................................... 13 4 15 5 17 5.1...................................................... 17 5.2...................................................... 17 5.3...................................................... 17 5.4...................................................... 18 6 19 6.1...................................................... 19 6.2...................................................... 28 6.3...................................................... 32 6.4 Webmail................................................. 36 6.5...................................................... 37 6.6...................................................... 38 7 39 7.1...................................................... 39 7.2 SQL.................................................... 41 8 43 8.1...................................................... 43 8.2 strategy.................................................. 43 8.3...................................................... 44 8.4...................................................... 45 8.5...................................................... 45 8.6 Telnet................................................... 46 8.7 Can postfix receive?.......................................... -
Concept of Mail Protocols Format of an Email Email Addressing
Concept of Mail Protocols Format of an Email Email Addressing A unique addressing system ,has two parts in addressing. Local part defines user mailbox and domain name mention the destination [email protected] Email alias:Create a group email to send email to many people like multicast. Email message fields Here are the meanings of the fields to be filled in when you send an email: ● From: this is your email address; most of the time you will not have to fill in this field, because it is generally set by the email client according to your preferences. ● To: This field is used for the recipient's email address. ● Subject: this is the title that your recipients will see when they want to read the email ● Cc (carbon copy): this allows an email to be send to a large number of people by writing their respective addresses separated by commas ● Bcc (blind carbon copy): This is a Cc, except that the recipient does not see the list of people in the Bcc field ● Message: This is the body of your message Other email functions are: ● Attached Files, Attachments: A file can be attached to an email by specifying its location on the hard drive. ● Signature: If the email client allows it, you are often able to set a signature, meaning a few lines of text which will be added to the end of the document. Email Delivery Queue Unlike ftp/http it is not necessarily to deliver email in real time.Delivery not instantaneous ,It will wait in the queue of outgoing,incoming ,intermediate MTA message queue.