DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Annual Conference 2 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

20Advancing PPE at every opportunity 182018 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2 CONTENTS Welcome 05 Schedule 06 Thursday 07 Friday 13 Saturday 22 New Orleans Suggestions 29 Participant Index 30 WELCOME 4 Dear Participants, Welcome to the Second Annual Meeting of the PPE Society. Having sponsored a number of sessions at other conferences, last year we decided to try a free-standing PPE Society Conference. Much to our pleasure, it was a real success. And enough people expressed the hope that we would hold another that... we are! Thank you so much for the role you will play in making this one a success. This program contains information about the various sessions that will be held during the conference. Most are concurrent, but we do have two keynote addresses, one by Charles Holt (on Thursday) and one by Ann Cudd (on Saturday). We also have two receptions (one on Thursday and one on Friday). A lot is jammed into the days. But the evenings are free for you to enjoy New Orleans and the company of an incredibly interesting group of people. The PPE Society’s mission is to encourage the interaction and cross-fertilization of three intellectual disciplines that are, in their history, deeply intertwined and that now, and going forward, have much to offer one another. If you have not already, please join the PPE Society (which you can do at www.ppesociety.web.unc.edu/join- the-ppe-society/). If you have any suggestions about how we might effectively pursue our mission please do not hesitate to pass them on to me. In the meantime, please enjoy the PPE Society’s 2018 conference! Cordially, Geoff Sayre-McCord Founder & Executive Director 2 March 15 THURSDAY6 Registration, Displays and Exhibits Room: Mahalia Jackson A Pharmaceutical Freedom Break Out Session 1 Author Meets Critics: Jessica Flanigan’s Jonathan Anomaly, Moderator 1:00 pm– 2:50 pm Participants: Jessica Flanigan (author) Alex Oprea (critic) Rishi Joshi (critic) Room: Storyville I Democratic Theory for Realists Kirun Sankaran, Moderator Participants: “Political Representation for Realists” – Jason Brennan “Should Representatives Protect Voters from Themselves?” – Chris Freiman “A Meritocratic Theory of Political Representation” – Thomas Mulligan Room: Storyville II Freedom Beyond Choice Matthew Adams, Moderator Participants: “The Strategy of Freedom” – Harrison Frye “Markets and Market Freedom” – Eric MacGilvray “Freedom and Bourgeois Dignity” – Colin Bird Room: Storyville III 21st Century Marxism Barry Maguire, Moderator Participants: “Racial Injustice and False Consciousness” – Vanessa Wills “A Progressive Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploita- tion Theory”– Naoki Yoshihara “Freedom from the Market: Kant’s Doctrine of the Right and the Marxian Critique of Capital” – Suzanne Love Room: Mahalia B 7 Break Out Session 1 cont. PPE of Rule of Law 1:00 pm – 2:50 pm Kyle Swan, Moderator Participants: “Migration by Maxim, Not Discretion: Immigration and the Rule of Law” – Glenn Furton “The Rule of Law in the Real World” – Paul Gowder “Hayek on the Ethical and Economic Importance of the Rule of Law: Answering the Razian Challenge” – Christopher Boom Room: Bechet Evolution and Rational Cooperation Ian Cruise, Moderator Participants: “Evolutionary Theories of Rational Rule-Following: A Dilemma” – David Wiens & Ryan Muldoon “Modeling a Coordination Regime” – Peter Vanderschraaf “Evolving a Gendered Division of Labor” – Cailin O’Connor Room: Jelly Roll Virtue & Economics Jennifer Baker, Moderator Participants: “Virtue and the Rule of Law in Aristotle’s Ethics”– Roopen Majithia “Profitability of Trust and Trustworthiness” – Ginny Choi “Maximization and The Sorites Paradox” – Leah Downey Room: Armstrong Technical Work in PPE Yoaav Issacs, Moderator Participants: “Inequality as a Latent Variable” – Devin Christensen “If Not ‘Believe Truth’ Then Maybe ‘Shun Error’: The Upshot of Robustness for Democratic Theory” – William Berger “Disagreement, The Pareto Principle, and Conflicting Reasons” – Itai Sher Room: Buddy Bolden 8 Break Out Session 2 Author Meets Critics: Cristina Bicchieri’s Norms in the Wild 3:00 pm – 4:50 pm Ryan Muldoon, Moderator Participants: Cristina Bicchieri (author) Jenna Bednar (critic) Geoffrey Brennan (critic) Room: Storyville I Social and Political Dimensions of Hope Adrienne Martin, Moderator Participants: “Collective Hope” – Katie Stockdale “Believing in Others” – Jennifer Morton (with Sarah Paul) “Hope and the Virtue of Creative Resolve” – Nicole Hassoun Room: Storyville II Public Schools and Public Choice Mike Munger, Moderator Participants: “Public Teachers and Public Choice” – Alexandra Oprea “ADHD Medication Effects on Primary and Secondary School Students” – Anna Chorniy “Public Goods and Education” – Jonathan Anomaly Room: Storyville III Property Rights Samantha Wakil, Moderator Participants: “Intellectual Property and the Entrepreneurial Process” – Nathan Goodman “The Morality of Changing Rights” – Chris Melenovsky “Property and Research Sharing in Biomedicine” – Bryan Cwik Room: Mahalia B 9 Break Out Session 2 Topics in Public Reason 3:00 pm – 4:50 pm Alex Campbell, Moderator Participants: “The Rule of Public Reason in the Constitution of Non-Domination” – Kyle Swan “Justice in Biotechnology: A Public Reason Approach to Human Enhancement” – Nicholas Geiser “Roger Williams: A Historical Case Study in Public Reason” – Kirun Sankaran Room: Bechet Business Ethics Jennifer Baker, Moderator Participants: “The Use and Abuse of Business Ethics” – Jim Otteson “Firm Paternalism and Business Ethics” – Greg Robson “Teaching Business Ethics: Theory and Practice” – Chris Surprenant Room: Jelly Roll Adam Smith Dan Shahar, Moderator Participants: “The Conceptual Building Blocks of the Theory of Moral Sentiments” – Bart Wilson “The Psychological Underpinnings of and the Institutional Balance of Prudence in Adam Smith’s System of Natural Liberty” – José de la Cruz Garrido “Practicing PPE: The Case of Adam Smith” – Ryan Hanley Room: Armstrong Critiques of the Market Chris Howard, Moderator Participants: “The Just Price, Exploitation, and Prescription Drugs: Why Free Marketeers Should object to Profiteering by the Pharmaceutical Industry” – Mark Reiff “Impure Semiotic Objections to Markets”– David Dick Room: Buddy Bolden 10 Plenary Session “Class Simulations for Political Economy” 5:00 pm – 6:00 pm Charles Holt, Keynote Speaker Room: Storyville I & II Reception Drinks, Appetizers, and Conversation 6:00 pm – 8:00 pm Room: Storyville III 11 2 March 16 FRIDAY12 Registration, Displays and Exhibits Room: Mahalia Jackson A Break Out Session 1 New Work on the Ethics of Risk 9:00 am – 10:50 am Yoaav Issacs, Moderator Participants: “Making Risky Decisions for Others” – Luc Bovens “Risks and Limited Interpersonal Aggregation” – Alec Walen “Probabilistic Causation, Moral Responsibility, and Aggregate Effects” – Johann Frick Room: Storyville I Taxation and Justice David Schmidtz, Moderator Participants: “Are ‘Luxury’ Taxes Justifiable?” – Hyunseop Kim “Self-Ownership, Taxation, and Takings” – Daniel Russell “Taxation Behind the Veil of Ignorance” – Biung-ghi Ju Room: Storyville II Immigration Miriam Johnson, Moderator Participants: “The Wrong of Religious and Racial Immigration Restrictions: the Lesson from Monopolies” – Sahar Akhtar “Immigration, Externalities, and Public Goods” – Rishi Joshi “Immigrant Selection, Health Requirements, and Disability Discrimination” – Doug MacKay Room: Storyville III Justice and Injustice in Public Finance Raymond Niles, Moderator Participants: “Taxable Capacity and Morality in Schumpeter’s ‘Crisis of the Tax State’” – Richard Salsman “U.S. Tax Policy, Inflation, and the Euthanasia of the Individual Investor” – Robert Wright Room: Mahalia B 13 Break Out Session 1 Cont. Perspectives on the Social Contract 9:00 am – 10:50 am Daniel Kokotajlo, Moderator Participants: “The Crooked Social Contract: Intra-Corporate Freedom and the Nexus-of-Contracts” – Katherine Jackson “States and States of Nature” – Chris Morris “The Calculus of Moral Community” – Brian Kogelmann Room: Jelly Roll Capitalism, Democracy, and the Self in Mid-Twentieth Century Thought Graham Hubbs, Moderator Participants: “Albert Hirschman and Psychoanalysis: Private Interest and the Ego after 1945” – Carolyn Biltoft “John Maynard Keynes and the Political Theory of Money”– Stefan Eich “From Market Disintegration to Political Integration: Karl Polanyi’s Democratic Horizon” – Steven Klein Room: Armstrong Mill’s (Social) Epistemology Ian Cruise, Moderator Participants: “Authority, Knowledge, and Naturalism in John Stuart Mill” – Christopher Macleod “Intellectual Diversity and Cognitive Bias: A Millian Approach” – Daniel Jacobson Comments on Macleod and Jacobson – Jonathan Riley Room: Buddy Bolden Effective Altruism Alexandru Marcoci, Moderator Participants: “Effective Altruism and Cooperation” – Alexander Dietz “Why Effective Altruism Can’t Be a Big Tent” – Amy Berg “Actualist, Possibilist, or Hybridist Effective Altruism? Fixing Effective Altruism’s Core Underspecification Problem” – Travis Timmerman Room: Storyville I 14 Break Out Session 2 Topics in PPE Administration, Logistics, and Curriculum 11:00 am – 12:50 pm Doug Paletta, Moderator Participants: Paul Hurley Jonathan Anomaly Stephen Simon Colin Bird Room: Storyville II Political Procedural Failures Kirun Sankaran, Moderator Participants: “The Limits of Proceduralist Justification” – Jake Monaghan “Proportionality-Preserving Polycentricity” – Daniel D’Amico “Making Science Propaganda-Proof” – Cailin O’Connor (with James Owen
Recommended publications
  • Who Preaches Protectionism? Economic and Electoral Influences on Trade-Related Position Taking in the Senate

    Who Preaches Protectionism? Economic and Electoral Influences on Trade-Related Position Taking in the Senate

    WHO PREACHES PROTECTIONISM? ECONOMIC AND ELECTORAL INFLUENCES ON TRADE-RELATED POSITION TAKING IN THE SENATE Robert A. Galantucci A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science. Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: Layna Mosley Timothy McKeown Thomas Oatley John Aldrich ABSTRACT ROBERT A. GALANTUCCI: Who Preaches Protectionism? Economic and Electoral Influences on Trade-Related Position Taking in the Senate (Under the direction of Layna Mosley.) Existing studies of Congressional behavior devote little attention to understand- ing legislators' trade-related position taking outside the context of roll call votes. Using a new dataset on bill sponsorship that spans fifteen congresses, the au- thor explores the factors that affect a senator's propensity to introduce protec- tionist trade bills, including state-level manufacturing characteristics, economic cycles and electoral vulnerability. The results provide support for a number of the prominent economic-based explanations for trade policy preferences, including the Heckscher-Ohlin and Ricardo-Viner models, and also draw attention to several additional economic and political influences on policy outcomes. Beyond trade politics, these findings have implications for the expanding body of research on bill sponsorship as well as the literature on the role of Congress in U.S. foreign policy making. i Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................
  • Book Review | a Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil by Candice Delmas Page 1 of 4

    Book Review | a Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil by Candice Delmas Page 1 of 4

    Democratic Audit: Book Review | A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil by Candice Delmas Page 1 of 4 Book Review | A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil by Candice Delmas In A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil, Candice Delmas aims to foster understanding of resistance to injustice as a capacious concept that can include the possibility of lawful dissent, principled disobedience and revolution. This is a provocative and rewarding contribution to the literature, writes Suzanne Smith, that is particularly valuable for its attention to the question of the situational conditions of obligatory, potentially uncivil resistance. Marchers carrying banner reading ‘We march with Selma!’, Harlem, New York City. Picture: Stanley Wolfson, New York World Telegram & Sun. This image is available from the United States Library of Congress‘s Prints and Photographs division under the digital ID cph.3c35695. No known copyright restrictions) A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. Candice Delmas. Oxford University Press. 2018. ‘A commonly heard complaint’, remarked Alexis de Tocqueville in his analysis of events leading up to 1789, ‘is that the French have no respect for law’. To his mind, given the corruption characteristic of the Ancien Régime, this was not surprising. He blamed this lack of respect on the deficit of ‘intermediary powers’ capable of integrating the concerns of ‘private individuals’ with the policies of the state. Yet what Tocqueville wrote with respect to attitudes concerning law in pre-Revolutionary France is sometimes also said of the post-1945 Republic, when intermediary powers were quite robust. No sooner did World War II end than did resistance – often violent – arise against dirigisme économique.
  • (Mobile) Denver

    (Mobile) Denver

    Curriculum Vitae for L. Lynne Kiesling June 7, 2020 L. Lynne Kiesling 2683 Java Court +1 773.484.0391 (mobile) ​ Denver, Colorado 80211 [email protected] and [email protected] ​ ​ ​ http://www.lynnekiesling.com ​ http://knowledgeproblem.com ​ SSRN author page: http://ssrn.com/author=240214 ​ ​ ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-2653 ​ ​ Current Appointments Visiting Professor, Department of Engineering July 2019-present & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University Co-Director, Institute for Regulatory Law and June 2018-present Economics Faculty Affiliate, Wilton E. Scott Institute for July 2019-present Energy Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University Education Ph.D. Economics, Northwestern University December 1993 B.S. cum laude Economics, Miami University May 1987 ​ ​ Phi Beta Kappa, 1987 Leadership and Negotiation Academy for Women, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University September 2017-March 2018 Past Appointments Visiting Associate Professor Department of Economics, Purdue University August 2017-June 2019 Associate Director Purdue University Research Center in Economics August 2017-June 2019 Associate Professor of Instruction Department of Economics, Northwestern University September 2010-August 2017 Director, Electricity Policy Program, Searle Center on Law, Regulation, and Economic Growth, Northwestern University September 2016-August 2017 Visiting Senior Lecturer (sabbatical) Department of Political Economy, King’s College London September 2014-March 2015 Senior Lecturer, Social Enterprise at Kellogg
  • Course Syllabus

    Course Syllabus

    Freedom Political Theory Project Course Description: Freedom has been called the greatest political concept of the modern world. But what is freedom? And if freedom is important, what should we do about it? Does freedom conflict with other important values, such as gender equality or distributive fairness? Can political systems that claim allegiance to freedom also make room for other values? Is the best society the one that cares only about freedom? Format: This is a demanding, reading intensive freshman seminar. As a seminar, classroom discussion is of the utmost importance. Be sure to complete all the readings before class meets each week, and come to class ready to join in the conversation. In this class, we are a team. So join in. Presentations: Each week, seminar will be opened by a brief presentation prepared by a team of two students. When it is your turn to present, your mission is NOT to teach the whole class, or to become world-class experts on the issues at hand. Rather, each presentation team is expected to study the assigned readings carefully, briefly summarize the main points, and to identify a few fundamental questions or challenges posed by the readings that they found most interesting (or confusing!). Requirements: 1. Students are expected to attend in each seminar, and to participate actively. We will allow one excused absence during the semester. Any additional absence will be penalized by a grade unit deduction from your final grade (so, if you had an A++, your final grade would be reduced to a measly A+, though of course if you had a B-, that would become a C+.
  • 2020 Annual Meeting 201 2 Contents

    2020 Annual Meeting 201 2 Contents

    20Advancing PPE at every opportunity 2020 ANNUAL MEETING 201 2 CONTENTS Welcome 05 Schedule 06 Thursday 06 Friday 14 Saturday 24 New Orleans Suggestions 34 Index and Notes 35 3 WELCOME Dear PPE Conference Participants, This is the Fourth Annual Meeting of the PPE Society! Welcome. The PPE Society continues to grow dramatically, as does the number of submissions for our annual conference. Our hope is that the resulting program gives you too much of interest and leaves you wishing you had more time to navigate the questions people in the sessions are exploring. New this year is our use of the Whova app, on which you will find details about the various sessions and information about speakers and other participants. In order to offer as many options as possible, we are again offering a large number of concurrent sessions. But we do have two keynote addresses, one by Steven Macedo (on Thursday) and one by Elizabeth Anderson (on Saturday). Receptions will follow each keynote address. As in the past, the days will be filled to the brim, but the evenings are free for you to enjoy New Orleans and the company of a fascinating group of people. The PPE Society’s mission is to encourage the interaction and cross-pollination of three intellectual disciplines that are historically deeply intertwined and continue to have much to offer one another. If you have not already joined the PPE Society, please do (using http://ppesociety.web.unc.edu/join-the-ppe-society/). If you have any suggestions about how we might effectively pursue our mission, please do not hesitate to pass them on to me.
  • Michael Valdez Moses Professor of Literature and the Humanities Smith

    Michael Valdez Moses Professor of Literature and the Humanities Smith

    Michael Valdez Moses Professor of Literature and the Humanities Smith Institute for Political Economy & Philosophy Argyros School of Business & Economics Chapman University One University Drive Orange, CA 92866 Ph: (714) 516-4561 (919) 724-9468 Beckett Building 131 [email protected] Associate Emeritus Professor Duke University [email protected] Academic Positions 2019- Professor of Literature and the Humanities, Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy and Argyros School of Business & Economics, Chapman University Associate Emeritus Professor, Duke University 1994-2019 Associate Professor of English & Affiliated Member of the Faculty in the Program in Literature, Duke University 1988-94 Andrew W. Mellon Assistant Professor of English, Duke University 1987 Assistant Professor of English, Duke University 1986-87. Instructor, Department of English, University of Virginia Visiting Appointments 2018-19 Visiting Professor of Literature and the Humanities, Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy & Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, CA 2010 Maclean Distinguished Visiting Professor, Colorado College, CO 2000-01. Duke Endowment Fellow, National Humanities Center, NC 1994 Visiting Fellow, Humanities Research Centre, Australian National University USIA Visiting Professor, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona 1992 Research Associate, University of Virginia 1990 USIA Visiting Professor, Université Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco Visiting Scholar, English Studies Research Centre, University of
  • Egalitarian Liberalism and Economic Freedom

    Egalitarian Liberalism and Economic Freedom

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Egalitarian Liberalism And Economic Freedom Pierce Randall University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Randall, Pierce, "Egalitarian Liberalism And Economic Freedom" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3680. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3680 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3680 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Egalitarian Liberalism And Economic Freedom Abstract This dissertation considers three major challenges to egalitarian liberal institutions made by classical liber- als: that egalitarian liberal institutions involve too much coercive interference with individual economic decisions, that free markets tend to do better at rewarding people on the basis of their economic choices, and that only by recognizing full liberal rights of ownership can a society best promote a stable property regime consistent with our pre-political conventions of ownership. Each of these objections fails, but they point to an underlying concern that egalitarian liberal institutions fail to adequately protect economic freedom. The dissertation then develops and defends a conception of economic freedom that is reflected in egalitar- ian liberal institutions. Economic freedom depends on the quality and availability of options individuals have in markets,
  • Anarchism and Business Ethics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 14 (4)

    Anarchism and Business Ethics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 14 (4)

    Franks, B. (2014) Anarchism and business ethics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 14 (4). pp. 699-724. ISSN 2052-1499 Copyright © 2014 The Author http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/100401/ Deposited on: 19 December 2014 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk the author(s) 2014 ISSN 1473-2866 (Online) ISSN 2052-1499 (Print) www.ephemerajournal.org volume 14(4): 699-724 Anarchism and business ethics: the social responsibility of the anarchist is to destroy ∗ business Benjamin Franks abstract ‘Anarcho’-capitalism has for decades occupied a small but significant position within ‘business ethics’, while the anarchism associated with the larger traditions of workers and social movements has only had a spectral presence. Social anarchisms’ forms of opposition and proposed alternatives to standard liberal business practices, identities and presuppositions have appeared only fleetingly in mainstream business ethics. In the light of these anarchist hauntings, this paper identifies and explores social anarchism’s critique of dominant forms of business ethics, and business practice. It applies anarchism’s critical insights to market-based ethics, of which Milton Friedman’s influential essay, ‘The Social Responsibility of the Businessman is to Increase Profits,’ is used as an exemplar. This paper differentiates the anarchist critique from the criticisms of corporocentric, economic-liberalism emanating from social democrats and advocates of corporate social responsibility. It demonstrates the pertinence of social anarchist approaches to re-thinking the co-ordination of the production and distribution of goods, highlighting inadequacies in state-centred managerial responses to the harms and deficiencies of Friedman’s free-market.
  • The Role of Government in a Free Society

    The Role of Government in a Free Society

    SMU McLane/Armentrout Scholars Reading Groups Fall 2018 Syllabus The Role of Government in a Free Society Dean Stansel, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor O’Neil Center for Global Markets & Freedom (www.oneilcenter.org) Cox School of Business, Crow 282B, office: 214-768-3492, [email protected] Meeting Times. Our meetings will be held on Tuesdays (McLane) and Wednesdays (Armentrout) at 6-8 pm in the O’Neil Center conference room (Crow 282). Both groups have the same readings. Attendance is required. Your attendance and active participation are required. We will have 10 on- campus meetings plus a joint reading group summit with the students from similar reading groups at Baylor, Texas Tech, and University of Central Arkansas. That will be held at SMU on the evening of Fri. Oct. 12 & the morning and early afternoon of Sat. Oct. 13 and is a required part of the program. You will not be paid the $1000 stipend if you do not attend. In addition, the O’Neil Center hosts several guest speakers throughout the semester. Tentative events are listed on the schedule at the end of this syllabus and you will be alerted if more are scheduled. You are required to attend at least one of those events, but are strongly encouraged to attend all of them for which you do not have a class or reading group conflict. You are expected to attend all 10 weekly meetings, but if you have an unavoidable conflict, you can make up for that absence by attending an extra one of these events (beyond the first required one).
  • 2021 APA Eastern Division Meeting Program

    2021 APA Eastern Division Meeting Program

    The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM VIRTUAL MEETING JANUARY 7 – 9, 2021 AND JANUARY 14 – 16, 2021 Use Coupon Code ZAPE21 to Save 30% (PB)/50% (HC) THROUGH FEBRUARY 16, 2021 ORDER ONLINE AT WWW.SUNYPRESS.EDU Critique in German Philosophy The Aesthetic Clinic From Kant to Critical Theory Feminine Sublimation in Contemporary María del Rosario Acosta López and Writing, Psychoanalysis, and Art J. Colin McQuillan, editors Fernanda Negrete The Primary Way The Disintegration of Community Philosophy of Yijing On Jorge Portilla’s Social and Political Chung-ying Cheng Philosophy, With Translations Foreword by Robert Cummings Neville of Selected Essays Carlos Alberto Sánchez and Jouissance Francisco Gallegos, editors A Lacanian Concept Néstor A. Braunstein Endangered Excellence Translation and Introduction by On the Political Philosophy of Aristotle Silvia Rosman Pierre Pellegrin Translated by Anthony Preus Epistemic Responsibility Lorraine Code A World Not Made for Us Topics in Critical Environmental Philosophy Manufactured Uncertainty Keith R. Peterson Implications for Climate Change Skepticism Recovering the Liberal Spirit Lorraine Code Nietzsche, Individuality, and Spiritual Freedom On Metaphysical Necessity Steven F. Pittz Essays on God, the World, Morality, and Democracy Adult Life Franklin I. Gamwell Aging, Responsibility, and the Pursuit of Happiness Carl Schmitt between John Russon Technological Rationality and Theology Modernity as Exception The Position and Meaning and Miracle
  • Leadership and Economic Policy Sandra J. Peart, Dean and E

    Leadership and Economic Policy Sandra J. Peart, Dean and E

    Leadership and Economic Policy Sandra J. Peart, Dean and E. Claiborne Robins Professor Spring 2020 Office Hours: T/Th 9:30 am and by appointment Email: [email protected] (best bet!) In this course, we explore two questions using historical debates on economic policy as our laboratory. First, what is the scope for policy makers and civil servants to lead the economy through cyclical and secular crises and the inevitable ups-and-downs that accompany economic expansion? How much agency should policy makers assume and when are unusual mechanisms called for? Second, what leadership roles do economists legitimately play in the development and implementation of economic policy? I will frame our discussions generally using the contrast between J. M. Keynes and Friedrich Hayek. One question will be whether this framing fits current debates and the split between Democrats and Republicans in the US. While the ideas of Keynes and Hayek will loom large in the historical context, our focus for contemporary issues is on policy as opposed to personalities. In both his written work and by example throughout his professional life, J. M. Keynes would argue for a significant role of economists as leaders. He acknowledged however that the influence of economists might overleap its usefulness. His General Theory famously closed with this passage: 1 The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.
  • To: University of Texas Faculty From: Andrew Koppelman This Workshop

    To: University of Texas Faculty From: Andrew Koppelman This Workshop

    To: University of Texas faculty From: Andrew Koppelman This workshop paper is the introduction and first chapter of a book in progress. It runs a little long. For those pressed for time, please focus on pp. 3-17, 46-47, and 52-61. The Corruption of Libertarianism: How a Philosophy of Freedom was Betrayed by Delusion and Greed Andrew Koppelman* Draft: Aug. 22, 2019 Please do not cite or quote Introduction.............................................. 3 Libertarian political philosophy has produced astonishing cruelty ...................................................... 3 But its best known form is a corrupted variant ............... 6 It began as a plea for freedom and prosperity ................ 8 And now takes multiple forms ................................. 9 some of them not very nice .................................. 10 Hayek has something valuable to offer today’s debates about inequality .................................................. 13 Unlike the delusionary romanticism of Murray Rothbard, Robert Nozick, and Ayn Rand ........................................ 15 Libertarianism is vulnerable to corruption .................. 17 And even in its most attractive form, it is an inadequate political philosophy, and points beyond itself .............. 20 Chapter One: Prosperity.................................. 23 In the 1930s, almost everyone wanted central economic planning ............................................................ 23 Modern libertarianism was born with Hayek’s protest against that idea ................................................... 25 * John Paul Stevens Professor of Law and Professor (by courtesy) of Political Science, Department of Philosophy Affiliated Faculty, Northwestern University. Please send comments, correction of errors, and grievances to [email protected]. 1 Hayek introduced the idea of markets as a way to cope with too much information – more than any planner could know ......... 27 And thought that, if the human race was going to become less poor, undeserved inequality had to be accepted .............