Defending China's Right to Self-Determination: Confronting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Defending China's Right to Self-Determination: Confronting Date: Thursday, May 25, 2000 1:01 :37 PM From: GOv1AR Subj: Fwd: FW: Defending China's Right to Self-Determination - Eric Mann To: pamelachiang@ hotmail.com, wendallchin@ hotmail.com, lchow@ seiu250.org, rfong @ccsf.cc.ca.us, say he @yahoo.com, clemlai@ socrates.berkeley.edu, julialau@ hotmail.com, edlee@ surfree.com, sun lee@ sirius.com, 0211 mliu@ umbsky.cc.umb.edu, Lydialowe, ericmar@ worldnet.att.net, Warrmar, rebeccapeng@ earthlink.net, mjsmith@ igc.apc.org, ptlee@ uclink4.berkeley.edu, davidtse @wco.com, o_tse@ hotmail.com, edwong @fdic.gov Forwarded Message: Forwarded Message: Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:07:50 PM From: adiaz@ igc.org Subj: FW: Defending China's Right to Self-Determination - Eric Mann From: adiaz@ igc.org (Antonio Dlaz) Antonio Dfaz Project Director People Organizing to Demand Environmental & Economic Rights (iPODER!) 474 Valencia Street #155 San Francisco, CA 94103 415-431-4210 (phone) 415-431-8525 (fax) [email protected] (email) From: Sid Shniad <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Defending China's Right to Self-Determination - Eric Mann Date: Wed, May 24, 2000, 12:26 PM Defending China's Right to Self-Determination: Confronting Imperialism, Racism, Chauvinism, and Anti-Communism in the United States by Eric Mann The current struggle over the People's Republic of China - granting or denying that nation "permanent normal" trade status with the U.S. and granting or denying it admission into the World Trade Organization - requires a strong intervention by those of us who see our work as building an anti-racist, anti-imperialist U.S. Left against U.S. chauvinism and in favor of China's rights to equality and self-determination in the world. There is an urgent need to sharpen the anti-imperialist tendency at a time when a series of demonstrations in Seattle and Washington D.C. have the potential to become either a refreshing anti-imperialist intervention in U.S. society or the replication of pro-imperialist politics masquerading as progressive internationalism. In the United States, the world's only superpower, the litmus test of whether a movement is progressive or reactionary is whether it confronts or allies with U.S. imperialism, supports or undermines the movements of self- determination of oppressed nations against its own ruling class, builds or undermines a world wide united front against racism, xenophobia, colonialism, and imperialism. Throughout U.S. history the vast majority of social movements have been objectively or consciously racist and pro-imperialist. Given the deep-seated racism, national chauvinism, and anti-communism of all sectors of U.S. society, and in particular, the chauvinism of most white U.S. progressives (even most of those calling themselves radicals or even revolutionaries), u~conditional support for China's permanent normal trade status, and unconditional admission of China into the WTO are essential challenges to the hysterical and hypocritical moralism of the AFL-CIO labor bureaucracy, and many "human rights," "labor" and "environmental" groups. Let me outline some of my core assumptions. * The United States and the G7 nations are the main danger to human rights, labor rights, environmental rights, and the main obstacle to anti­ colonial forms of self-determination, including socialism, in the world today. As the world's superpower, the United States dominates every international institution in which it operates - UN, NATO, IMF, World Bank, WTO. When it fails to dominate an organization, it seeks to destroy it. Thus, during the height of its power after WW II the U.S. pushed the United Nations as one of its essential arms in world affairs (and fought to keep Communist China out for many years.) Then, when China was admitted and the Third World and socialist nations had some power in the UN, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Reagan/Bush evaded any UN authority to challenge U.S. imperialist intervention. Later, when the Soviet Union disintegrated and many anti-colonial forces in the Third World were disoriented and weakened, the U.S. and the Clinton administration turned again to the UN, twisting many arms to get UN approval of the attacks and blockades of Iraq. Then, in Kosovo, when the U.S. saw it did not have Security Council support for its aggression, (because of the opposition of the Soviet Union and China!) it undermined the UN and unilaterally invaded through NATO. In each situation the U.S. dominates and bullies the world. But no one votes whether or not the U.S. should be kicked out of the UN, or NATO, or the WTO. Instead, it is always the U.S. that manipulates discussions about everyone else's human rights records to serve its own objectives - in the past to stop Communist China from impacting the UN, now to advance its own trade objectives by admitting China into the WTO, tomorrow to try to kick China out of the UN if China proves to be too strong an adversary. It makes sense for the U.S. ruling class to have such tactical flexibility, but it is disgraceful for alleged progressives in the world's superpower to join in the hypocritical pontificating about whether they think China has made enough "progress" on human rights to warrant "normal" trade status, or should it be admitted into world bodies dominated by their own ruling class. This is little more than the white man's burden revisited. When we more accurately rename these international institutions - U.S.-dominated UN, U.S.-dominated NATO, US-dominated IMF, U.S.­ dominated World Bank, and U.S.-dominated WTO - it becomes more apparent just how offensive it is to hear the AFL-CIO and self-appointed U.S. "international human rights groups" demand "Keep China out of the US-dominated WTO." The U.S. seeks to achieve unfair advantage in all of its trade dealings and will try to impose the most onerous conditions of trade and investment on China. The U.S. objective is to import Chinese goods at the lowest possible prices, and impose U.S. technology, investment, and exports on the Chinese people on terms most favorable to the U.S. - as well as to use trade and investment as a Trojan horse to undermine Chinese sovereignty if possible. Conversely, from the perspective of the Chinese people, regardless of their political difference, trade is fundamentally a weapon in the struggle against colonialism and foreign domination. China's objectives, regardless of whether we think their government is socialist or capitalist, is to sell its goods on the world market and to attract foreign capital on terms most beneficial to the Chinese government, the Communist Party, and the Chinese people. Both parties understand that "normal" trade relations and mutual participation in world bodies such as the WTO do not end the struggle between the imperialist superpower and the Asian Third World nation it simply "normalizes" some of the rules of the conflict for an international class struggle between oppressor nation and oppressed nation. Contrary to the assertions of anticommunist liberals such as Senator Paul Wellstone, "most favored nation" status is not a "privilege" to be doled out by the U.S. Congress based on annual reviews of China's behavior by the world's superpower. Granting China permanent normal trade status, and admission into the WTO will simply curtail the annual rite of imperialist judgementalism and hypocrisy - and that will be a victory for the international united front against racism and imperialism. The anti-imperialist left should support the unconditional granting of trade status with China, and the unconditional admission of China into the WTO to challenge the efforts by the Clinton/Gore and other G7 administrations to impose unfair conditions on China - such as the demand that U.S. and other transnationals be allowed to own more 50% or more of Chinese enterprises. That is why the demand for unconditional admission by the Left is so important, for it then confronts the conditional and imperialist demands of the Clinton administration to exact even further concessions from the Chinese people. The protests of liberal democrats, pro-imperialist environmentalists, and the AFL-CIO against China simply strengthen Clinton's bargaining position - trying to extract more concessions from China in order to justify his "taking on" the reactionary labor movement in his own country. In this international power play, the role of young white Seattle radicals in joining this shakedown of China is appalling. Seeing the World Through An Anti-Colonial Lens. The Chinese people have carried out one of the great revolutions of the 20th century, freeing their people from colonialism, opium, footbinding, prostitution, poverty, starvation, war, and subjugation. They stopped the U.S. invasion of Korea, supported the Vietnamese revolution, and been of enormous help for many Third World revolutions - including the Black Liberation struggle in the U.S. Conversely, they have also attacked Vietnam after its successful revolution, moved their economy and society in a capitalist direction, and suppressed internal dissent within the Communist Party, as well as in the trade unions and society at large. But as Mao said, "we must divide one into two" - China, as with all societies, contains a struggle between progressive and reactionary tendencies. As Chinese leftists and democrats fight it out among themselves as to the best direction for Chinese society, the U.S. Left should focus its main blow on its own government, and the human rights atrocities throughout the world inflicted by the U.S. government. The debate led by U.S. liberals, labor bureaucrats, and capitalists about the best way to use trade to "civilize" China is racist and reactionary. It must be opposed. The U.S. Labor bureaucracy - reactionary at home, reactionary abroad The AFL-CIO labor bureaucracy is perhaps most hypocritical.
Recommended publications
  • (Prexy) Nesbitt Anti-Apartheid Collection College Archives & Special Collections
    Columbia College Chicago Digital Commons @ Columbia College Chicago Finding Aids College Archives & Special Collections 9-1-2017 Guide to the Rozell (Prexy) Nesbitt Anti-Apartheid Collection College Archives & Special Collections Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.colum.edu/casc_fa Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation "Rozell (Prexy) Nesbitt oC llection," 2017. Finding aid at the College Archives & Special Collections of Columbia College Chicago, Chicago, IL. http://digitalcommons.colum.edu/casc_fa/26/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College Archives & Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Columbia College Chicago. It has been accepted for inclusion in Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Columbia College Chicago. Rozell (Prexy) Nesbitt Collection This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 01, 2017. eng Describing Archives: A Content Standard College Archives & Special Collections at Columbia College Chicago Chicago, IL [email protected] URL: http://www.colum.edu/archives Rozell (Prexy) Nesbitt Collection Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 4 Biography ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 About the Collection .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Locked Down: the Hidden History of the Prisoners' Rights Movement
    Locked Down: The Hidden History of the Prisoners’ Rights Movement Tiana Alexandria Williams* Mentor: Dr. Jesse Drew Department of Cinema and Digital Media, UC Davis Abstract In recent years, there has been an increasing discourse centered on the prison-industrial complex, addressing issues that range from ending the school-to-prison pipeline to calls for the abolition of prisons entirely. However, this movement is far from a novelty, rather, it is the resurgence of a forgotten moment in history that is being revitalized by a new generation. In order to understand the recent development of the anti- incarceration movement, it is important to provide context to these current conversations and ensure that the contributions of the prisoner’s rights movement are properly understood. Through the uncovering and analysis of archival materials, collections of recorded oral histories and published prison letters, this paper illustrates how prisoner activism of the 1970s brought the plight of prisoners into the limelight, while also leading to increased systemic repression and a debilitating historical declension narrative. By highlighting this history of prisoner activism, this paper challenges the declension hypothesis approach to the prisoners’ rights movement and investigates the movement’s effects on the current day structure of the criminal justice system. Introduction The prisoners’ rights movement is an undermentioned and understudied movement that grew for decades in the United States, finally reaching maximum visibility in the early 1970s. The dominant narrative surrounding the movement can be traced as: The American prison system was cruel, inhumane and unjust. Prisoners fought for better conditions and rights, using similar rhetoric to that of the Civil Rights Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Enough Being Reasonable: Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)
    Enough Being Reasonable: Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and Moral Absolutism’s Contribution to Democracy i A Thesis Presented By: Nicholas Haas To: The Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honors) April 2012 Abstract Political theory that addresses morality’s role in politics most often emphasizes the need for political actors who are moral compromisers. Politicians have a responsibility to serve the people, and they will sometimes be faced with a dilemma: either stick to their personal morals or violate those morals because the political office requires it; many political theorists insist that these politicians should do the latter. These theorists value consensus as a fundamental cornerstone of democracy, and they associate a willingness to sacrifice one’s personal morality for the greater good with a democratic ideology and mindset. They typically dismiss the potentially positive influence that moral absolutists, especially ones who are able to build public support and therefore power behind their causes, might have on a democracy. This thesis challenges theorists to consider potential democratic benefits of oppositional moral absolutists who ground their arguments in democratic rhetoric and principles. It pushes these theorists, then, to consider both how oppositional moral absolutists and how confrontation and conflict might serve democratic interests and society. The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) movement of
    [Show full text]
  • The Weather Underground Report Committee on The
    94TH CoNobasg let eeio#8 00MMITTEN PRINT THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND REPORT OF TH7 SUBCOMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT AND OTHER INTERNAL SECURITY LAWS OF THn COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FOURTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JANUARY 1975 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OF110 39-242 WASHINGTON : 1975 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.8. Government Prnting Office, Waohington, D.C. 2040a Pice $1.60 jJ54QC~ -.3 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JAMES 0. EASTLAND, MIsisppi, Chbaimon JOHIN L. McCLELLAN, Arkansas ROMAN L. 71 It USKA, Nebraska PHILIP A. HART, Michigan III RAM L. FONO0, Hawali EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Mamaohusmtts H1UOH SCOTT, Pennsylvania BIRCH BAYH, Indiana STROM TiUItMON D, South Carolina QUENTIN N. BURDICK, Nmth Dakota CIJA RLES McC. MATHIAS, JR., Maryland ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia WILLIAM L. 8('OTT, Virginia JOHN V. TUNNEY, California JAMES ABOUREZK, South Dakota SUnCOMMiTTIv To INVKSTIOATH TIe ADMINISTrATION o0 THE, INTERNAL SECURITY ACT AND OTHER INTERNAL SECURITY LAWS JAMES 0. EASTLAN ), MAisissdppi, Chairman JOHN L. McCLELLAN, Arkanras STROM TIHURMOND, South Carolina BIRCH BAYJI. Indiana J. 0. SOURWINH, Chief Cownsel ALYONUO L. TARADOCHIIA, Chief InIVtesgalor MARY DOOLEY, Adcng Director of Research RESOLUTION Resolved, by the Internal Security Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, that the attached report entitled "The Weather Underground," shall be printed for the use of the Com- mnittee on the Judiciary. JAMES 0. EASTLAND, Chairman. Approved: January 30, 1975. (n) CONTENTS Pan Foreword ......................................................... v The Weatherman Organization 1 Overview ......................................................... 1 Weatherman Political Theory-----------------------------. 9 Weatherman Chronology ........................................... 13 National War Council .....---------------------------- 20 The Faces of Weatherman Underground ............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Way the Wind Blew a History of the Weather Underground
    The Way The Wind Blew A History Of The Weather Underground Author: Ron Jacobs Publisher: Verso Date: 1997 ISBN: 1-85984-167-8 Table of Contents Preface....................................................................................................................1 1. 1968: SDS Turns Left...........................................................................................3 2. Weather Dawns: The Break and the Statement .................................................13 3. Into the Streets: Days of Rage ..........................................................................21 4. Down the Tunnel: Going Underground ..............................................................35 5. Women, The Counterculture, And The Weather People .....................................45 6. Changing Weather.............................................................................................61 7. A Second Wind? The Prairie Fire Statement ......................................................75 8. The End of the Tunnel: Weather and Its Successors..........................................83 Bibliography.............................................................................................................i A Weather Chronology ............................................................................................v The Cast ...............................................................................................................xiii List of Acronyms ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • After Durban – a Symposium
    Poverty & Race POVERTY & RACE RESEARCH ACTION COUNCIL January/February 2002 Volume 11: Number 1 Help Us Find a New Executive Director for PRRAC – see page 4 After Durban – A Symposium The August-September 2001 United Nations World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, in Durban, South Africa, was an event of epic proportions, despite the Bush Administration’s disgraceful decision first to send a low-level delegation, then to walk out. Follow-up work by NGOs in the US (and elsewhere) was of course deeply impacted by the events of September 11 and their aftermath. We asked a number of people who attended – some PRRAC Board members (past as well as present) and other friends of PRRAC – to offer their reflections on the meaning of these events for race issues and work in the US. We welcome further observations by other readers who attended the Conference, as well as readers’ commentaries on the 12 essays offered here; we’ll consider all for publication in our next issue. The UN has prepared a Sept. 19, 2001 document – “Declaration, Adopted on 8 September 2001 in Durban, South Africa,” accompanied by this note: “This text has been put together by the secretariat on the basis of its notes. It is now being submitted to the principal officers of the Conference for their review and will subsequently go through the process of formal editing. We’ll be happy to send you a copy of this 32-page document if you’ll send us a self-addressed label and $1.33 in postage.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Dreams  
    Freedom Dreams . “A powerful book....Robin D. G. Kelley produces histories of black rad- icalism and visions of the future that defy convention and expectation.” — . ove and imagination may be the in the imaginative mindscapes of Lmost revolutionary impulses Surrealism, in the transformative po- available to us, and yet we have tential of radical feminism, and in the failed to understand their political four-hundred-year-old dream of importance and respect them as reparations for slavery and Jim powerful social forces. Crow. This history of renegade intellec- With Freedom Dreams, Kelley af- tuals and artists of the African dias- firms his place as “a major new voice pora throughout the twentieth cen- on the intellectual left” (Frances Fox tury begins with the premise that the Piven) and shows us that any serious catalyst for political engagement has movement toward freedom must be- never been misery, poverty, or op- gin in the mind. pression. People are drawn to social movement because of hope: their Robin D. G. Kelley, a frequent con- dreams of a new world radically dif- tributor to the New York Times, is ferent from the one they inherited. professor of history and Africana From Aimé Césaire to Paul Robe- studies at New York University and son to Jayne Cortez, Kelley unearths author of the award-winning Ham- freedom dreams in Africa and Third mer and Hoe, Race Rebels, and Yo’ World liberation movements, in the Mama’s Disfunktional! He lives in hope that Communism had to offer, New York City. When History Sleeps: A Beginning i FREEDOM DREAMS ii Freedom Dreams Other works by Robin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Or View a Pdf of This Article
    GreenNew Orleans Economics Climate Justice for Black New Orleans By Eric Mann as Hurricane Katrina the worst “natural” disaster in American history? Or was it man-made? W The documentary film, “Rising Waters: Global Warming and the Fate of the Pacific Islands”1 illustrates some of the key impacts of global warming in what the Alliance of Small Island States calls “extreme weather events.” Nations and peoples that have anticipated and controlled flooding for thousands of years are now experiencing uncontrollable super-sized floods, hurricanes, and tornados. Island and coastal nations that previously had effective mechanisms to protect themselves from terrible but predictable weather events are now overwhelmed, as coral reefs—those natural levees against flooding—are being destroyed by warmer ocean temperatures. These torrential winds, rains, and floods go beyond any definition of “normal,” yet the system tries to pass them off as natural disasters. “The total amount of energy the hurricanes resolved in eco-friendly ways, has increased toxic release—a figure calculated from wind speed and emissions since World War II to unprecedented levels 18 duration—has increased over the last 50 years by in the history of the world. The auto, oil, and highway somewhere between 50 to 80 percent,” says Kerry industries contribute to the production of greenhouse Emanuel, professor of atmospheric science at gases that generate global warming and climate Massachusetts Institute of Technology and author of change, which in turn cause the extreme weather “Divine Wind: The History and Science of events that are imposed on vulnerable peoples, Hurricanes.” resulting in illness, dislocation, homelessness, despon- In a recent article in the journal Science, Peter J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roots of Black Lives Matter Unveiled - WND
    6/3/2020 The roots of Black Lives Matter unveiled - WND FRONT PAGE POLITICS U.S. WND The roots of Black Lives Matter unveiled Special report reveals stunner: Except for website, there is no actual organization By WND Staff Published January 16, 2016 at 7:44pm Editor's Note: This is a special report from the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism. By James Simpson The Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) casts itself as a spontaneous uprising born of inner city frustration, but is, in fact, the latest and most dangerous face of a web of well-funded communist/socialist organizations that have been agitating against America for decades. Its agitation has provoked police killings and other violence, lawlessness and unrest in minority communities throughout the U.S. If allowed to continue, that agitation could devolve into anarchy and civil war. The BLM crowd appears to be spoiling for just such an outcome. Nevertheless, BLM appears to be exercising considerable leverage over the Democratic Party, in part by pressuring and intimidating Democratic candidates such as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (VT) into embracing their cause. The movement could also assist President Obama's exploitation of racial divisions in society beyond his final term in office. This report examines in detail, for the first time, how communist groups have manipulated the cause of Black Lives Matter, and how money from liberal foundations has made it all possible. https://www.wnd.com/2016/01/the-roots-of-black-lives-matter-unveiled/#3vzcIcxXdGmy750Q.99 1/14 6/3/2020 The roots of Black Lives Matter unveiled - WND Leftist origins Exploiting blacks to promote Marxist revolution is an old tactic.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyond the Rison Industrial O Piex September25 - 27, 1998 Universityof California,Berkeley
    I eyond the rison Industrial o piex September25 - 27, 1998 Universityof California,Berkeley © Rupert Garcia, 1992/98 Welcometo CriticalResistaree: the PrismIndustrial X.We thank you for being a part of this impressive group of individuals and organizations who work in many arenas against prison expansion, not only within the U.S., but in other coun­ tries as weli. As members of the Critical Resistance Organizing_Committee, we have con­ vened this conference and strategy session in honor of generations of anti-prison activists current and former prisoners, advocates, scholars and cultural workers. This conference and campaign are a testament to our political ancestors, and to their undaunted commit­ ment to social justice. 1 When the Critical Resistance Organizing Committee first came together over a year ago, our goal - which we thought of as ambitious - was to organize a large conference of 500 people, bringing together those who had devoted many years of their lives to anti-prison activism with those who had never previously considered the deep connection of prison issues to their work in other progressive arenas. In the course of our work, we discovered how much we had underestimated the interest in such a conference and campaign. We are now expecting more than twice as many participants. We welcome all of you to Critical Resistance and especially invite you to participate in the exciting process of launching a large-scale campaign to combat the prison industrial complex. Rather than attempt to address all prison-related issues, we decided to focus our efforts on the symbiotic connection between the corporate economy and the punishment industry.
    [Show full text]
  • CYSO-Program-Book-Fall-2019 1.Pdf
    CYSO 19/20 SEASON MUSIC The Bienen School of Music offers · A 152,000-square-foot state-of-the-art facility · Conservatory-level training combined with the academic flexibility of an elite research institution · Traditional BM, BA, MM, PhD, and DMA degrees as well as innovative dual-degree, self-designed, and double-major programs · Close proximity to downtown Chicago www.music.northwestern.edu workshop and gallery Darnton & Hersh Fine Violins Expert appraisers, restorers and dealers in violin family instruments and bows 11 East Adams, Suite 1450 Chicago, Illinois 60603 312.566.0429 Learn more at darntonhersh.com CYSO’S MISSION IS TO INSPIRE AND CULTIVATE PERSONAL EXCELLENCE THROUGH MUSIC MUSIC DIRECTOR’S LETTER “Orchestras are like people. They’re the sonic embodiment of their community.” - Simon Rattle Dear friends, Welcome to the 73rd season of CYSO! Since 1946, CYSO has provided the preeminent orchestral experience to young people from Chicago and surrounding areas, but we are now so much more than that one orchestra. With our most advanced groups, including the new CORE chamber orches- tra, and an array of symphonic, string, steel, and jazz orchestras and chamber ensembles, CYSO’s combination of top quality and wide LETTER MUSIC DIRECTOR’S accessibility is unmatched. Why orchestras? While private study and practice are of course important to gain the skills to thrive in a musical ensemble, it is through the interaction with other musicians that the greatest benefits are felt. The diference between playing solo and playing music with others is the diference between giving a lecture and having a conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzle of Social Movements in American Legal Theory Scott L
    The Puzzle of Social Movements in American Legal Theory EVIEW R Scott L. Cummings ABSTRACT LA LAW LA LAW UC In one of the most striking developments in American legal scholarship over the past quarter century, social movements have become central to the study of law. In constitutional theory, movements have emerged as key drivers of legal reform, creating new constitutional ideals and minimizing concerns of activist courts overriding the majority will. In lawyering theory, movements have appeared as mobilized clients in the pursuit of social change, leading political struggle and shifting attention away from concerns about activist lawyers dominating marginalized groups. In a surprising turnabout, social movements—long ignored by legal academics—have now achieved a privileged position in legal scholarship as engines of progressive transformation. Why social movements have come to play this dramatic new role is the central inquiry of this Article. To answer it, the Article provides an original account of progressive legal theory that reveals how the rise of social movements is a current response to an age-old problem: harnessing law as a force for social change within American democracy while still maintaining a distinction between law and politics. AUTHOR Robert Henigson Professor of Legal Ethics and Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. For invaluable feedback on this project, I am grateful to Richard Abel, Catherine Albiston, Anthony Alfieri, Sameer Ashar, Leo Beletsky, Devon Carbado, Paola Cecchi Dimeglio, Rashmi Dyal-Chand, Ingrid Eagly, Steve Ellman, Nora Engstrom, Peter Enrich, Laurel Fletcher, Jody Freeman, Duncan Kennedy, Máximo Langer, Frank Munger, Sasha Natapoff, Doug NeJaime, Pricilla Ocen, Russell Pearce, Nick Robinson, James Rowan, Ben Sachs, Chris Schmidt, Jeff Selbin, Bill Simon, David Trubek, Louise Trubek, Michael Waterstone, Lucie White, David Wilkins, and Noah Zatz.
    [Show full text]