DOCSLIB.ORG

Aguirre Cordero Rogelio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aguirre Cordero Rogelio Vicerrectorado de INVESTIGACION ESCUELA UNIVERSITARIA DE POSGRADO “APLICACIÓN DE LA METODOLOGÍA DE VALORACIÓN CUALITATIVA, PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN SOSTENIBLE, DEL ÁREA NATURAL PROTEGIDA - DE LA CORDILLERA HUAYHUASH” TESIS PARA OPTAR EL GRADO ACADÉMICO DE MAESTRO EN GERENCIA DE PROYECTOS EN INGENIERÍA AUTOR: AGUIRRE CORDERO ROGELIO ASESOR: DR. JORGE LESCANO SANDOVAL JURADOS: DR. WALTER B. ZUÑIGA DÍAZ DR. CESAR ARGUEDAS MADRID DR. VIRGILIO E. FLORES VIDAL LIMA – PERÚ 2019 DEDICATORIA A, Jesús Alexander y Guadalupe Sophía, mis grandes tesoros. Rogelio A. 3 AGRADECIMIENTO Quiero expresar mi gratitud a Dios, quien con su bendición llena siempre mi vida y a toda mi familia, por estar siempre presentes. Rogelio A. 4 ÍNDICE DEDICATORIA ............................................................................................................. 3 AGRADECIMIENTO .................................................................................................... 4 RESUMEN .................................................................................................................... 11 ABSTRAC ..................................................................................................................... 12 CAPITULO I ................................................. ¡ERROR! MARCADOR NO DEFINIDO. INTRODUCCIÒN ......................................... ¡ERROR! MARCADOR NO DEFINIDO. 1.1. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA .............................................................. 14 1.2. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROBLEMA ..................................................................... 15 1.2.1. A nivel global ............................................................................................ 15 1.2.2. A nivel local .............................................................................................. 15 1.3. FORMULACION DEL PROBLEMA .................................................................. 16 1.3.1. Problema general ....................................................................................... 16 1.3.2. Problemas específicos ............................................................................... 16 1.3.3. Formulación nominal y operativa ............................................................. 16 1.4. ANTECEDENTES ................................................................................................ 17 1.4.1. Internacionales .......................................................................................... 17 1.4.2. Nacionales ................................................................................................. 19 1.5. JUSTIFICACIÓN ................................................................................................. 21 1.6. LIMITACIONES .................................................................................................. 22 1.6.1. Limitaciones metodológicas ...................................................................... 22 1.6.2. Limitaciones del investigador ................................................................... 22 1.7. OBJETIVOS ......................................................................................................... 22 1.7.1. Objetivo general ........................................................................................ 22 1.7.2. Objetivos específicos ................................................................................. 22 1.8. HIPOTESIS ........................................................................................................... 23 1.8.1. Hipótesis general ....................................................................................... 23 1.8.2. Hipótesis especificas ................................................................................. 23 CAPITULO II ............................................................................................................... 25 MARCO TEÓRICO ..................................................................................................... 25 2.1. MARCO CONCEPTUAL ..................................................................................... 25 2.1.1. Valoración Cualitativa ............................................................................... 25 2.1.2. Áreas Naturales Protegidas - ANP ............................................................ 27 5 CAPITULO III ............................................................................................................. 36 METODO ...................................................................................................................... 36 3.1. TIPO DE INVESTIGACIÓN ................................................................................ 36 3.2. POBLACIÓN Y MUESTRA ................................................................................ 36 3.2.1. Población ................................................................................................... 36 3.2.2. Muestra ...................................................................................................... 37 3.3. OPERACIONALIZACIÓN DE VARIABLES ..................................................... 38 3.4. INSTRUMENTOS ................................................................................................ 38 3.5. PROCEDIMIENTOS ............................................................................................ 39 3.6. ANÁLISIS DE DATOS ........................................................................................ 39 3.7. CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS ........................................................................... 40 CAPITULO IV .............................................................................................................. 42 RESULTADOS ............................................................................................................. 42 4.1. DESCRIPCION DEL ÁREA DE ESTUDIO ........................................................ 42 4.1.1. Ubicación y localización ........................................................................... 42 4.1.2. Creación y área de la cordillera Huayhuash .............................................. 43 4.1.3. Limites perimétricos de la cordillera Huayhuash ...................................... 43 4.1.4. Geografía y ecosistemas de la cordillera Huayhuash ................................ 47 4.1.5. Las comunidades campesinas en la cordillera Huayhuash ........................ 47 4.2. METODOLOGÍA DE VALORACIÓN CUALITATIVA APLICADA ............... 48 4.2.1. Ejes temáticos ............................................................................................ 48 4.2.2. Descripción de la metodología .................................................................. 48 4.3. EL ECOSISTEMA NATURAL COORDILLERA HUAYHUASH ..................... 51 4.3.1. El ecosistema natural y su valoración del ANP ........................................ 51 4.3.2. Breve descripción del trabajo de campo ................................................... 53 4.3.3. Amenaza de la cordillera Huayhuash ........................................................ 54 4.4. RECURSOS NATURALES APROVECHABLES DE LA COORDILLERA HUAYHUASH ..................................................................................................... 55 4.4.1. Recursos mineros en la cordillera Huayhuash .......................................... 55 4.4.2. Biodiversidad en la cordillera Huayhuash ................................................ 56 4.4.3. Recursos turísticos ..................................................................................... 56 4.4.4. Flora y Fauna ............................................................................................. 56 4.5. PERCEPCIÓN SOCIAL SOBRE LA EVALUACIÓN RAPIDA DE LA COORDILLERA HUAYHUASH ........................................................................ 58 6 4.5.1. Población participante en la entrevista a profundidad .............................. 59 4.5.2. Análisis de las respuestas hechas a los entrevistados ................................ 60 4.6. MAPEO DE ACTORES EN EL PROCESO DE VALORACIÓN CUALITATIVA DEL ANP DE HUAYHUASH .............................................................................. 75 4.7. CONTEXTUALIZACIÓN GUBERNAMENTAL Y MARCO NORMATIVO .. 78 4.7.1. Marco normativo que vincula a la cordillera Huayhuash ......................... 78 4.7.2. Implicaciones normativas en el área de estudio ........................................ 81 CAPITULO V ............................................................................................................... 85 DISCUSION DE RESULTADOS ............................................................................... 85 5.1. EL DIAGNÓSTICO Y LA APLICACIÓN METODOLOGICA SOBRE VALORACIÓN CUALITATIVA ........................................................................ 85 5.2. LOS ECOSISTEMAS Y LOS EJES TEMÁTICOS PARA EL USO RACIONAL DE LOS RECURSOS DE LA COORDILLERA HUAYHUASH, EN BASE A LA PERCEPCIÓN SOCIAL ....................................................................................... 87 5.3. RECURSOS NATURALES PARA SU APROVECHAMIENTO A TRAVÉS DE LA VALORACION CUALITATIVA .................................................................. 89 5.4. ACTORES EN EL PROCESO PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE LA METODOLOGIA DE VALORACIÓN CUALITATIVA .................................... 90 CAPITULO VI .............................................................................................................. 93 CONCLUSIONES .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to the Bofedales of the Peruvian High Andes
    An introduction to the bofedales of the Peruvian High Andes M.S. Maldonado Fonkén International Mire Conservation Group, Lima, Peru _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY In Peru, the term “bofedales” is used to describe areas of wetland vegetation that may have underlying peat layers. These areas are a key resource for traditional land management at high altitude. Because they retain water in the upper basins of the cordillera, they are important sources of water and forage for domesticated livestock as well as biodiversity hotspots. This article is based on more than six years’ work on bofedales in several regions of Peru. The concept of bofedal is introduced, the typical plant communities are identified and the associated wild mammals, birds and amphibians are described. Also, the most recent studies of peat and carbon storage in bofedales are reviewed. Traditional land use since prehispanic times has involved the management of water and livestock, both of which are essential for maintenance of these ecosystems. The status of bofedales in Peruvian legislation and their representation in natural protected areas and Ramsar sites is outlined. Finally, the main threats to their conservation (overgrazing, peat extraction, mining and development of infrastructure) are identified. KEY WORDS: cushion bog, high-altitude peat; land management; Peru; tropical peatland; wetland _______________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION organic soil or peat and a year-round green appearance which contrasts with the yellow of the The Tropical Andes Cordillera has a complex drier land that surrounds them. This contrast is geography and varied climatic conditions, which especially striking in the xerophytic puna. Bofedales support an enormous heterogeneity of ecosystems are also called “oconales” in several parts of the and high biodiversity (Sagástegui et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat TM and ETM+ Derived Snowline Altitudes in the Cordillera Huayhuash and Cordillera Raura, Peru, 1986–2005
    The Cryosphere, 5, 419–430, 2011 www.the-cryosphere.net/5/419/2011/ The Cryosphere doi:10.5194/tc-5-419-2011 © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Landsat TM and ETM+ derived snowline altitudes in the Cordillera Huayhuash and Cordillera Raura, Peru, 1986–2005 E. M. McFadden1,*,**, J. Ramage1, and D. T. Rodbell2 1Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, 1 West Packer Ave., Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA 2Geology Department, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308, USA *now at: Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, 1090 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA **now at: School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, 275 Mendenhall Laboratory, 125 S. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Received: 13 August 2010 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 6 October 2010 Revised: 10 March 2011 – Accepted: 4 May 2011 – Published: 23 May 2011 Abstract. The Cordilleras Huayhuash and Raura are remote and better-known Cordillera Blanca, and has 117 glaciers glacierized ranges in the Andes Mountains of Peru. A robust covering ∼85 km2 (Morales Arnao, 2001). Peaks are typ- assessment of modern glacier change is important for under- ically over 6000 m a.s.l., with the highest peak recorded at standing how regional change affects Andean communities, 6617 m a.s.l. (Nevado Yerupaja).´ The Cordillera Raura, lo- and for placing paleo-glaciers in a context relative to mod- cated to the southeast of the Cordillera Huayhuash, has ern glaciation and climate. Snowline altitudes (SLAs) de- a slightly smaller (55 km2) glacier area (Morales Arnao, rived from satellite imagery are used as a proxy for modern 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Folleto Inglés (1.995Mb)
    Impressive trails Trekking in Áncash Trekking trails in Santa Cruz © J. Vallejo / PROMPERÚ Trekking trails in Áncash Áncash Capital: Huaraz Temperature Max.: 27 ºC Min.: 7 ºC Highest elevation Max.: 3090 meters Three ideal trekking trails: 1. HUAYHUASH MOUNTAIN RANGE RESERVED AREA Circuit: The Huayhuash Mountain Range 2. HUASCARÁN NATIONAL PARK SOUTH AND HUARAZ Circuit: Olleros-Chavín Circuit: Day treks from Huaraz Circuit: Quillcayhuanca-Cójup 3. HUASCARÁN NATIONAL PARK NORTH Circuit: Llanganuco-Santa Cruz Circuit: Los Cedros-Alpamayo HUAYHUASH MOUNTAIN RANGE RESERVED AREA Circuit: Huayhuash Mountain Range (2-12 days) 45 km from Chiquián to Llámac to the start of the trek (1 hr. 45 min. by car). This trail is regarded one of the most spectacular in the world. It is very popular among mountaineering enthusiasts, since six of its many summits exceed 6000 meters in elevation. Mount Yerupajá (6634 meters) is one such example: it is the country’s second highest peak. Several trails which vary in length between 45 and 180 kilometers are available, with hiking times from as few as two days to as many as twelve. The options include: • Circle the mountain range: (Llámac-Pocpa-Queropalca Quishuarcancha-Túpac Amaru-Uramaza-Huayllapa-Pacllón): 180 km (10-12 days). • Llámac-Jahuacocha: 28 km (2-3 days). Most hikers begin in Llámac or Matacancha. Diverse landscapes of singular beauty are clearly visible along the treks: dozens of rivers; a great variety of flora and fauna; turquoise colored lagoons, such as Jahuacocha, Mitucocha, Carhuacocha, and Viconga, and; the spectacular snow caps of Rondoy (5870 m), Jirishanca (6094 m), Siulá (6344 m), and Diablo Mudo (5223 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Del 29 De Agosto De 2006 Víctor Raúl Espinoza
    TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL PLENO JURISDICCIONAL EXP. N.O 0033-2005-PI/TC SENTENCIA DEL PLENO JURISDICCIONAL DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL Del 29 de agosto de 2006 Víctor Raúl Espinoza Soto, en representación del Gobierno Regional de Paseo (demandante), contra el Congreso de la República (demandado). Asunto: Demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por don Víctor Raúl Espinoza Soto, en representación del Gobierno Regional de Paseo, contra la Ley 26458 (Ley de creación de la Provincia de Lauricocha en el departamento de Huánuco). Magistrados presen / 2 TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL SUMARIO l. Asunto 11. Datos generales 111. Normas sujetas a control de constitucionalidad IV. Antecedentes 1. Demanda de in constitucionalidad a. Argumentos sobre la inconstitucionalidad formal de la norma impugnada b. Argumentos sobre de la in constitucionalidad material 2. Contestación de la demanda Materias constitucionalmente relevantes mentos Petitorio La potestad del Congreso de la República para aprobar la demarcación territorial §3. El bloque de constitucionalidad §4. El Decreto Supremo 044-90-PCM, ¿forma parte del bloque de constitucionalidad? ~ IV. Fallo 3 TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL EXP. N.O 0033-2005-PI!fC LIMA GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE PASCO SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL En Arequipa, a los 29 días del mes de agosto del 2006, el Tribunal Constitucional en sesión de Pleno Jurisdiccional, con la asistencia de los señores magistrados García Toma, Gonzales Ojeda, Alva Orlandini, Bardelli Lartirigoyen, Vergara Gotelli y Landa Arroyo, pronuncia la siguiente sentencia I. ASUNTO Demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por el Presidente de la Región Paseo ntr el artículo 3 de la Ley 26458, que crea la Provincia de Lauricocha en el Dep rtamento de Huánuco, publicada el 2 de junio de 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Trekking Como Actividad Turística Alternativa Para El Desarrollo Local Del Distrito De Olleros, Provincia De Huaraz
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ADMINISTRATIVAS E.A.P. DE ADMINISTRACIÓN DE TURISMO Trekking como actividad turística alternativa para el desarrollo local del Distrito de Olleros, Provincia de Huaraz TESIS Para optar el Título Profesional de Licenciado en Administración de Turismo AUTOR Leydi Elsa Ramos Ledesma ASESOR Fray Masías Cruz Reyes Lima – Perú 2015 DEDICATORIA Con cariño y aprecio a Dios, mis queridos padres y hermanos por su apoyo y paciencia para el logro de este objetivo. 2 AGRADECIMIENTOS Este trabajo de tesis realizado es un esfuerzo que involucró el apoyo directo e indirecto de distintas personas; por ello deseo expresar mi agradecimiento a aquellos que me dieron su apoyo incondicional durante el desarrollo del trabajo de investigación. Al profesor Fray Cruz, profesor y guía, por su incansable apoyo en la corrección y asesoramiento de este trabajo de tesis. A mis padres y hermanos quienes estuvieron para brindarme toda su ayuda, a mis compañeros y amigos por su motivación. Asimismo a Carla, Carol, Claudia, Lorena, Sigrid, Verónica, Yulissa y Zully por su ayuda en la corrección y apoyo en el trabajo de campo. A los representantes de SERNANP - Huaraz, el Sr. Clodoaldo Figueroa y el Sr. Edson Ramírez. Asimismo, a representantes de la Asociación de Servicio de Auxiliares de Alta Montaña del Sector Olleros - Chavín, el Sr. Calixto Huerta y el Sr. Jorge Martel por su apoyo en las entrevistas realizadas. A representantes y estudiantes de la Escuela de Turismo de la Universidad Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo de Huaraz por las facilidades brindadas para la obtención de información de libros y tesis de la universidad referente a la actividad estudiada.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Cordillera Huayhuash Digital Alpine Cartography with Imperfect Data
    Mapping the Cordillera Huayhuash Digital Alpine Cartography with Imperfect Data Martin Gamache Digital Cartographer Alpine Mapping Guild 1 Kenney St #2, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 USA [email protected] www.alpinemapguild.com This paper will examine the issues involved in creating a topographic map for an audience of recreationists (climbers, trekkers, and hikers) for a remote mountain area of Peru. The Cordillera Huayhuash, a sub range of the Cordillera Occidental of the Peruvian Andes, is a compact but impressive massif located a few kilometers south of the better known Cordillera Blanca. Like its sister range it was initially surveyed and mapped in the 30’s by an Österreichischen Alpenverein (Alpenvereinskarte/ D.O.A.V.) party. Since then the range has been remapped by the Peruvian I.G.N. at 1:100,000 scale. The two map sheets covering the range while useful do not meet the requirements of climbers and hikers. Unlike the D.O.A.V. sheets (Cordillera Blanca North and South) covering the Cordillera Blanca which are in the process of being updated and reissued, it may be years before the Cordillera Huayhuash sheet is revised by the prestigious European group. Other recreational maps also fail to meet the needs of this special group of users. In the fall of 1999 the Alpine Mapping Guild obtained digital topographic data to the Cordillera Huayhuash and has been preparing a shaded relief topographic map of the range. Initial quality control verification work was done in the field during the 2000 climbing season by the AMG. A first edition of the map is planned for release in late spring of 2002.This paper reviews previously available maps to the areas and how the AMG map improves upon this work to serve its audience’s special needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Peruvian World Class Copper
    Peruvian World class copper 2018 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Peruvian world class copper 2018 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ANTAMINA · Reporte de Sostenibilidad 2018 3 Índex 1 2 3 4 5 Message from 2018 We are Antamina Talent We all build Environmental About GRI content the CEO and in figures excellence. ADN at its max development commitment this report index President We are of Antamina Antamina p. 4 p. 5 p. 8 p. 20 p. 27 p. 37 p. 47 p. 55 p. 56 ANTAMINA · 2018 Sustainability Report 4 Letter from the President and CEO GRI 102-14 Dear Friends: With great satisfaction we present the 2018 Sustainability Report, which renews our As in previous reports, in this document we also give account of our specific commit- commitment to the excellent performance of Antamina’s operations, as well as to ment to the region that welcomes us. During 2018, more than 40% of our employees the transparency in our economic, social and environmental performance. came from Ancash. We also make local purchases for about US$ 40 million. I am proud to lead one of the most reputable companies in social responsibility and one Our commitment to Ancash also incorporates joint work with the communities in our of the ten great companies to work for in Peru, according to the independent surveys area of influence and with their authorities, under a multi-stakeholder model that performed by reputable rankings. I can attest to the daily effort of all our collabora- equates everyone’s role in the search for a common vision of development. We are, tors, strategic partners and suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascent of Rondoy
    106 THE ASCENT OF RONDOY THE ASCENT OF RONDOY1 BY DAVID WALL. (Four illustrations: nos. 38-4I) HE London School of Economics Mountaineering Club sent an expedition to the Cordillera de Raura in Peru in 1961. The leader of that successful expedition Peter Bebbington later went on a reconnaissance of the Cordillera Huayhuash. He was impressed by everything he saw there, especially by Rondoy, which he knew had defeated Walter Bonatti earlier that year. He arrived back in England in May, 1962, after working for Griffiths of the Peruvian Times as do most expedition leaders in Peru, it seems. He arrived back to discover that Dave Condict and I, both at L.S.E., were planning an expedition. We had been unable to go out in '61 and were hoping to make up for it in '63. We had nowhere particular in mind and Pete found it easy to persuade us to adopt Rondoy as our objective. By Christmas, 1962, we had three more members Graham Sadler and Charles Powell they also had wanted to go out in '61 but had somehow not managed it and Vic Walsh. While Pete was in Lima working for the Peruvian Times, he met the advance party of the New Zealand 1962 Andean Expedition; this consisted of Vic Walsh and Pete Farrell. 2 After that expedition Vic came to London his home town­ to work in Fleet Street, we were all able to meet him, and on Pete's suggestion invited him to join us. Vic's inclusion greatly increased the strength of the expedition, and the Mount Everest Foundation agreed to ~upport us.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Andean Ascents 1961-1970
    ML A Survey of Andean Ascents 1961-1970 A Survey of Andean Ascents: 1961~1970 Part I. Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru. EVELIO ECHEVARR~A -,!!.-N the years 1962 and 1963, the American A/pine Journal published “A survey of Andean ascents”. It included climbs dating back to the activity deployed by the Andean In- dians in the early 1400’s to the year 1960 inclusive. This present survey attempts to continue the former by covering all traceable Andean ascents that took place from 1961 to 1970 inclusive. Hopefully the rest of the ascents (in Bolivia, Chile and Argentina) will be published in 1974. The writer feels indebted to several mountaineers who readily pro- vided invaluable help: the editor of this journal, Mr. H. Adams Carter, who suggested and directed this project: Messrs. John Ricker (Canada), Olaf Hartmann (Germany) and Mario Fantin (Italy), who all gave advice on several ranges, particularly in Peru. Besides, the following persons also provided important information that helped to solve a good many problems on the history and geography of Andean peaks: Messrs. D.F.O. Dangar and T.S. Blakeney (Great Britain), Ben Curry (Great Britain-Colombia), Ichiro Yoshizawa (Japan), Hans-Dieter Greul and Christian Jahl (Germany), J. Monroe Thorington, Stanley Shepard and John Peyton (United States) and Christopher Jones (Great Britain- United States). The American Alpine Club, through its secretary, Miss Margot McKee, helped immensely by loaning books and journals. To all these persons I express my gratitude. This survey has been compiled mostly from mountaineering and scientific literature, as well as from correspondence and conversation with mountaineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains Are Listed by Their Official Names and Ranges; Quotation Marks Indicate Unofficial Names
    INDEX Volume 25 0 Issue 57 0 1983 Compiled by Patricia A. Fletcher This issue comprises al1 of Volume 25 Mountains are listed by their official names and ranges; quotation marks indicate unofficial names. Ranges and geographic locations are also indexed. Unnamed peaks (e.g. Peak 2037) are listed following the range or country in which they are located. All expedition members cited in major articles are included, whereas only the leaders and persons supplying information iti the Climbs and Expeditions section are listed. Titles of books reviewed in this issue are grouped as a single entry under Book Reviews. Abbreviations used: Article: art.; Bibliography: bibl.; Obituary: obit. A Alaska, arts., 77-80, 81-86, 87-92, 93-97, 98-101; 139-52 Abi Gamin (Garbwal Himalaya), 252-53 Alaska Range (Alaska), arts.. 87-92, Abuelo (Patagonia), 209 93-97; 139-48, 149-50 Acay (Argentina), 206 Alaska Range (Alaska): Peak 9050. See Accidents: Annapuma, 240, 241-42; Broken Tooth. Peak 11300, 148 Annapuma III, 239; Bhagirathi II, Aleta de Tiburbn (Patagonia), 212 253; Broad Peak, 271; Cho Oyu, 232; Alfred Wegener Peninsula (Greenland), Everest, 8-14. 22-29, 227, 228, 183-84 229-30; Gasherbrum II, 269-70, 271; Alligator Rock (Rocky Mountain Gongga Shari,, 291-92; K2, 273, National Park, Colorado), 171 295-96; Kuksar, 283; Kun, 265; Allison, Stacy, 30-34 Langtang Lirung, 235; Makalu, 220; Alpamayo (Cordillera Blanca, Peru), Manaslu, 236, 237; Nanga Parbat, 284, 192, 194 288; Nun, 263. Porong Ri, 295; “Alpe Adria.” See Greenland, Peak 3270. Shivling, 257 Altai Mountains (USSR), 298-300 Aconcagua (Argentina), 206-7 Altar Group (Ecuador), 184 Adela (Patagoma), 209 Amadablam (Nepal Himalaya), an., AdrSpach (Czechoslovakia), 129-3 1 30-34; 222 “Aene Pinnacle” (Sierra Nevada, American Alpine Club, The: Blue Ridge California), 155 Section.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Jennifer Kristen Lipton 2008
    Copyright by Jennifer Kristen Lipton 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Jennifer Kristen Lipton Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Human Dimensions of Conservation, Land Use, and Climate Change in Huascaran National Park, Peru Committee: Kenneth R. Young, Supervisor Gregory W. Knapp Kelley A. Crews Karl W. Butzer Richard H. Richardson Human Dimensions of Conservation, Land Use, and Climate Change in Huascaran National Park, Peru by Jennifer Kristen Lipton, B.S.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Dedication This is dedicated to the following list because of one or all of these characteristics: inspiration, beauty, integrity, patience, and support The mountain landscape, water in all forms, the flora and fauna of the Peruvian Andes The communities, families, and friends that live in and around the Cordillera Blanca My mentors that guided me in the discipline, in the classroom, and in the field Friends that I’ve had all along and friends that I met along the way Loving family that were always by my side Thank you Acknowledgements There is not enough space, and certainly not enough time, to express the amount of gratitude that I have to so many for making this research a reality. Many of the people that deserve this acknowledgement will probably not ever read these pages. And, so it is those individuals that I want to acknowledge first: the inhabitants living within reach of the Cordillera Blanca that sat with me, laughed with me, patiently listened while I spoke in broken Spanish, answered my questions, let me sit in on meetings, taught me about their landscape and lives, taught me how to dance a huayno , and showed me a dynamic landscape that is worth more than all of the gold contained within the hills.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
    Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on May 4, 2011 Geological Society of America Bulletin Structural Evolution of the Cordillera Huayhuash, Andes of Peru PETER J CONEY Geological Society of America Bulletin 1971;82;1863-1884 doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1971)82[1863:SEOTCH]2.0.CO;2 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Bulletin Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes Copyright © 1971, The Geological Society of America, Inc. Copyright is not claimed on any material prepared by U.S.
    [Show full text]