CITY PROFILE 2019

The relationship between citizens and authorities is fragile in Kostiantynivka. The low levels of trust in local institutions and GOOD GOVERNANCE sense of care translates into scepticism about reforms. Invest in service delivery, civic dialogue and transparent communication.

Kostiantynivka 15 cities* Feeling that authorities represent Belief that the citizens’ concerns 6.3 reforms cannot TRUST IN UKRAINIAN TRUST IN TOWN 3.1 and views, equally be implemented ARMY ADMINISTRATION care about all parts effectively and of and are 2.1 will benefit only ready to listen the elite TRUST IN POLICE 2.9 UKRAINIAN SCEPTICISM AUTHORITIES CARE ABOUT REFORMS TRUST IN 0.7 PERCEIVED LEVEL OF CORRUPTION AMONG… MAYOR OR HEAD OF THE TOWN TRUST IN 7.4 9.5 9.3 9.0 9.0 THE PRESIDENT 8.2 7.7 0 2 4 6 8 10 Prioritize anti-corruption initiatives to improve trust in institutions. JUDGES/ PARLIAMEN- POLICE DOCTORS TEACHERS LOCAL PROSECUTORS TARIANS AUTHORITIES

COMMUNITY BONDS CONFIDENCE THAT MEMBERS FROM OTHER GROUPS WILL LISTEN Kostiantynivka 15 cities* PEOPLE FROM 9.6 EASTERN UKRAINE SOCIAL TOLERANCE Being tolerant in terms of personal interaction and/or acceptance in the community IDPS 9.3 (towards IDPs, immigrants, Muslims, people with different skin colour, LGBT, Roma, drug addicts) PEOPLE LIVING 9.2 IN THE NGCA

PRO-EU ORIENTED 8.4 PEOPLE

PRO-RUSSIA 7.8 ORIENTED PEOPLE

ATO/JFO MILITARY 7.1

PEOPLE FROM 5.7 WESTERN UKRAINE

0 2 4 6 8 10 Focus interventions on building a culture of dialogue to provide a basis for collaboration among different socio-demographic and political groups.

CONTACT WITH PEOPLE FROM 5.3 EASTERN UKRAINE Prioritise interventions promoting multiculturalism COMMUNITY 4.9 through the media and people-to-people contact to fos- COOPERATION Feeling that people in their 0 2 4 6 8 10 ter tolerance to diversity and community cooperation. community care for each other and cooperate to solve common problems

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: , , Lysychansk, , , Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, , Starobilsk, Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). among 15 cities among 15 cities SATISFACTION WITH CITY LIFE

Kostiantynivka 15 cities*

SAFETY & SECURITY MARGINALIZATION Feeling treated unfairly because of their position in society or identity ECONOMIC SECURITY Being able to provide 4.2 for your family 44 % of citizens of Kostiantynivka stated that they experienced unfair treatment because of their political opinions. POLITICAL SECURITY Freedom to express 4.1 political opinions Develop initiatives to investigate and address HEALTH SECURITY Access and affordability 3.8 institutionalized discrimination and improve of medical services political security. PERSONAL SECURITY Feeling safe on the streets 2.6 and protected by the police ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY 2.2 LOCALITY SATISFACTION 2.5 5.8 Satisfied with the state of (in terms of jobs, leisure activities and raising children) environment and air quality 0 2 4 6 8 10 79 % of citizens in Kostiantynivka think that leisure SERVICES & EMPLOYMENT activities present in their locality are not adequate

PROVISION OF PUBLIC 4.4 SERVICES To improve life satisfaction in the city, focus interventions around raising awareness and access PROVISION OF 3.4 INFRASTRUCTURE to welfare, administrative and health care services. Additionally, invest in family and youth friendly EMPLOYMENT 2.0 OPPORTUNITIES collaborative and creative leisure activities.

0 2 4 6 8 10

PRIDE IN YOUR LOCALITY When you think about your locality, to what extent are you proud of the following? Design initiatives focusing on local traditions FAMOUS PEOPLE 8.7 around food and hospitality to strengthen pride in cultural heritage and community bonds. Prioritise TRADITIONS 8.1 initiatives that can improve sense of safety, such as neighbourhood watch. HOSPITALITY 8.0 CIVIC BEHAVIOUR CUISINE 7.9

To change 44 % ACTIVE CREATIVITY 7.7 things in your Willing to use political community you and social means of action are... without violence 4.7 CULTURAL HERITAGE 7.6 SENSE OF CIVIC 5 % VIOLENT RESPONSIBILITY Willing to use violence Feeling responsible NATURE 7.5 for the future of the country 52 % PASSIVE COMMUNITY BONDS 7.0 Not willing to do anything

SAFETY AND 2.0 To motivate passive citizens, concentrate on small SECURITY scale civic initiatives relevant to their sense of pride INDUSTRY AND 1.9 that bring immediate benefit to the community. PRODUCTION

0 2 4 6 8 10

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. among 15 cities among 15 cities A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city).

City profiles are part ofthe SCORE for Eastern Ukraine 2019 project funded by the USAID, implemented by the Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD), and in partnership with the UN Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme. The contents of this research do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or UN. For more information, please visit www.scoreforpeace.org