DOCSLIB.ORG

Hororata Community Centre Feasibility Study – Public Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hororata Community Centre Feasibility Study – Public Consultation Hororata Community Centre Feasibility Study 10 August 2017 FINAL DRAFT PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Prepared by Octa Associates Ltd This Report is © to Octa Associates Ltd It may not be photocopied or transmitted in any electronic form and may not be provided to any third party without the approval of Octa Associates Ltd _______________________________________________________________________ Hororata Community Centre – Feasibility Study Octa Associates Ltd August 2017 Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Objectives of the Feasibility Study ..................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Study Methodology Overview ........................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Project Structure ................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Current Status of Public Spaces ............................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Township ............................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Hororata Hall ...................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Utilisation .................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Condition ................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Hororata Reserve ............................................................................................................................. 11 3.3.1 Heritage Features ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Utilisation .................................................................................................................................. 12 3.3.3 Amenities .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.4 Selwyn District Council Planning ...................................................................................................... 13 4. Community Initiatives ......................................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Hororata Highland Games ................................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Heritage of Hororata and Beyond Trail ............................................................................................ 15 4.3 Central Plains Water (CPW) Scheme ................................................................................................ 15 5. Public Consultation ............................................................................................................................. 16 5.1 Mana Whenua .................................................................................................................................. 16 5.2 Community Workshops .................................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Public Meetings ................................................................................................................................ 17 5.4 Selwyn District Council ..................................................................................................................... 18 5.5 Key Findings ..................................................................................................................................... 18 5.5.1 The Situation ............................................................................................................................. 18 5.5.2 Community Aspirations ............................................................................................................. 18 5.5.3. Community Ideas ..................................................................................................................... 18 5.5.4 Community Concerns ................................................................................................................ 19 5.6 Community Needs ............................................................................................................................ 20 _______________________________________________________________________ Hororata Community Centre – Feasibility Study Octa Associates Ltd August 2017 -1- 6. Existing Facilities ................................................................................................................................. 21 7. Development Options ......................................................................................................................... 23 7.1 Hororata Hall .................................................................................................................................... 23 7.1.1 Upgrade vs. Build New .............................................................................................................. 23 7.1.2 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 24 7.2 Hororata Reserve ............................................................................................................................. 25 7.3 Village Hub ....................................................................................................................................... 26 7.4 Possible Solution .............................................................................................................................. 27 7.5 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 27 7.6 Facility Brief ...................................................................................................................................... 28 7.7 Location on Reserve ......................................................................................................................... 30 8. Feasibility Assessment ........................................................................................................................ 31 8.1 Capital Cost Estimate ....................................................................................................................... 32 8.2 Operation Cost Estimate .................................................................................................................. 33 Operating Cost Savings ........................................................................................................................ 33 8.3 Revenues .......................................................................................................................................... 34 8.4 Financial Viability ............................................................................................................................. 36 9. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix 1: Domain Assets and Amenities Plan .................................................................................... 38 Appendix 2: Hororata Heritage and Beyond Promotional Brochure ...................................................... 39 Appendix 3: Hororata Cultural Narrative ................................................................................................ 40 Appendix 4: Octa Preliminary Findings Memo ....................................................................................... 41 Appendix 5: Public Meeting Agenda, 26 June 2017 ................................................................................ 42 Appendix 6: Capital Cost Estimate .......................................................................................................... 43 Appendix 7: Operating Cost Estimate ..................................................................................................... 44 _______________________________________________________________________ Hororata Community Centre – Feasibility Study Octa Associates Ltd August 2017 -2- 1. Executive Summary A local group “Go Hororata” has been formed to promote discussion about the future development of Hororata’s public spaces. This Feasibility Study was commissioned to identify the community’s needs, determine the potential to upgrade the existing Hororata Hall and explore options to better utilise the Hororata Reserve. The objective of this Study is to have a community development project included in the Selwyn District Council’s Long Term Plan and to secure a funding contribution within the next 10 years. Public Consultation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultra-Fast Broadband Programme
    Collingwood Takaka Clifton Marahau Kaiteriteri Riwaka Motueka Tasman Karamea Ruby Bay Havelock The Brook Hope Picton ULTRA-FAST Brightwater Nelson Tapawera Spring Creek Wakefield Roselands Commercial Renwick Blenheim Fairhall Riverlands BROADBAND TASMAN Burleigh Granity Carters Beach Waimangaroa Seddon St Arnaud Westport MARLBOROUGH PROGRAMME Murchison Punakaiki Reefton Blackball WEST Ahaura Runanga COAST Kaikoura Taylorville Dobson Greymouth Hanmer Springs Moana Kumara Waiau Hokitika Rotherham Kaniere Culverden Cheviot Ross Hawarden Waikari Arthurs Pass Waipara Amberley Hari Hari Leithfield Castle Hill Tuahiwi Leithfield Beach Ashley Cust Whataroa Oxford Waikuku Beach West Eyreton Woodend Sheffield Rangiora Mandeville Franz Josef Kaiapoi Belfast Darfield Kirwee Fox Glacier Coalgate Prestons CANTERBURY Hororata West Melton Christchurch Rolleston Lyttelton Methven Springston Diamond Harbour Mt Somers Dunsandel Lincoln Doyleston Duvauchelle Rakaia Takamatua Leeston Akaroa Ashburton Northpark Southbridge Ashburton Little River TaiTapu Kennedys Bush Lake Tekapo Fairlie Geraldine Winchester Hornby Quadrant Prebbleton Pleasant Point Temuka Twizel Timaru Omarama Pareora Otematata Lake Hawea Kurow Waimate Wanaka Luggate Duntroon Glenavy Arrowtown and Lake Hayes Estate Lower Shotover Pisa Moorings Arthurs Point Naseby Weston Queenstown Cromwell Oamaru Omakau Ranfurly Jacks Point Bannockburn Maheno Taranui Clyde Alexandra Hampden Moeraki Kingston OTAGO Palmerston Te Anau SOUTH ISLAND Roxburgh Waikouaiti SOUTHLAND Karitane Manapouri PARTNER: Warrington Mossburn Waitati Waikaia Lumsden Janefield Outram Dunedin Allanton Riversdale Lawrence UFB Additional Fibre Tapanui Mosgiel Ohai Nightcaps Milton Tuatapere Otautau Winton Gore Clinton Stirling Balclutha Mataura Kaitangata Wallacetown Edendale Wyndham Riverton West Invercargill Owaka Otatara Tokanui Bluff.
    [Show full text]
  • ¥73 A-048 A-048
    1476000 1478000 1480000 1482000 1484000 1486000 1488000 1490000 1492000 1494000 1496000 1498000 1500000 1502000 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Waimakariri 8 0 0 2 2 5 Nutrient 5 Ryton River Allocation Zone Foggy Stream Lake Porter River 0 Lyndon 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 Lake Zone 0 2 2 5 Simois Stream 5 Lake Coleridge Kowai River Coach Stream Scamander Stream Lake 73 0 ¥ 0 0 Lyndon 0 0 0 4 Kowai Forest 4 0 0 2 2 5 5 Macfarlane Lake Georgina Stream Cardinal Lake Georgina Stream Lake Zone Acheron River Parker Stream 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Red Lakes 0 2 2 5 5 H A RP ER R O A D Coleridge Stream 0 0 0 Thirteen 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mile Bush 0 2 Rakaia Nutrient 2 5 5 Allocation Zone Stream 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 9 1 1 5 Acheron River Ben More 5 McCracken Lake Coleridge A Stream LG ID Stream US RO AD Ben More Stream 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Packers Creek THIRTEEN 6 9 9 1 1 5 MILE BUSH 5 Dry Rakaia River Acheron Selwyn River C O LE Stream North Branch R ID G E D R OU O 0 B A 0 0 L 0 E D 0 0 4 4 H 9 Dry 9 1 I 1 5 Redcliffe L 5 Jack Stream L Acheron Stream R U Stream N R O A D 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 9 Bush Stream 9 1 1 5 5 Hutt Stream Ford Stream Copper Selwyn Stream No.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan Variation 1 Selwyn Te Waihora REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS of HEARING COMMISSION
    Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan Variation 1 Selwyn Te Waihora REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF HEARING COMMISSIONERS ADOPTED BY COUNCIL AS ITS DECISION ON 23 APRIL 2015 APPENDIX B PROPOSED VARIATION 1 INCLUSIVE OF RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS Variation 1 to the Proposed Canterbury Land & Water Regional Plan NOTE: If in the unlikely event that the amended Variation differs from the recommendations in Appendix 1 then the Amended Variation prevails. Section 5 – Region-Wide Rule 5.69 The use and disturbance of the bed (including the banks) of a lake, river or a wetland by stock and any associated discharge to water that does not meet one or more of the conditions 2 to 4 of Rule 5.68, excluding Condition 1, and is not listed as a non-complying activity under Rule 5.70 or a prohibited activity under Rule 5.71 is a discretionary activity. 5.164 The introduction or planting of any plant, or the removal or disturbance of existing vegetation in, on or under the bed of a lake or river that does not comply with one or more of the conditions 1, 3 or 5 to 7 of Rule 5.163, excluding Conditions 2 and 4, is a restricted discretionary activity. The exercise of discretion is restricted to the following matter: 1. The actual and potential adverse environmental effects of not meeting the condition or conditions of Rule 5.163 [Amendments to Section 9 - Christchurch-West Melton] Add the following text to the introduction before Section 9.1 The West Melton Special Zone is a defined area where there is a high density of bores and has in the past seen significant groundwater development for irrigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Development and Regeneration Dynamics of Restored Urban Forests
    Temporal Development and Regeneration Dynamics of Restored Urban Forests By Katherine de Silva A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Ecology & Biodiversity School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Sciences Victoria University of Wellington October 2019 Supervisors: Stephen Hartley. Director of the Centre of Biodiversity & Restoration Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington Kiri Joy Wallace. Postdoctoral Fellow, Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato. Katherine de Silva: Temporal Development and Regeneration Dynamics of Restored Urban Forests, © October 2019. 2 ABSTRACT Urban forest restoration programmes are a key tool used to initiate, re-create or accelerate the succession of forest species; improving ecosystem services, function, resilience and biodiversity. Succession is a temporal shift in species dominance driven by abiotic and biotic influences, but over decadal timescales the trajectory and success of restoration plantings in degraded urban environments can be hindered. To facilitate the successful reconstruction of forest ecosystems from scratch, an understanding of the temporal patterns in planted forest development, dynamics of seedling regeneration and dominant drivers of seedling diversity is required. Using a chronosequence approach, permanent plots were established at 44 restored urban forests aged 5 to 59 years since initial plantings took place, across five New Zealand cities between Wellington and Invercargill. Vegetation surveys were undertaken and data on micro- climate were collected. This study examined the 1) temporal dynamics of restored urban forest development and seedling regeneration and 2) dominant drivers of seedling regeneration. Data were analysed using linear regression models, breakpoint analysis and mixed-effects modelling. Early forest development (<20 years) exhibited the most changes in canopy composition and structure, forest floor dynamics, seedling community and microclimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Plants in the Wakatipu
    The Wakatipu Basin has some of the most unique and adaptive groups of plants found anywhere on the planet. Extensive modification of our landscape has seen these plants all but disappear from large parts of the basin. However, the importance of native species in New Zealand is being gradually recognised, and the importance of plants in the Wakatipu Basin is no exception. Many in the past have considered native plants slow growing and poorly adaptive, but the truth is the complete opposite. Native species found in the basin have had millions of years to adapt to its harsh, but beautiful terrain. It is important for anyone considering planting to determine what plants are right for this area so they can not only thrive, but help increase biodiversity values and bring back the native birds. This practical guide has been written to help anyone who is interested in planting native species within the Wakatipu Basin. It tells the story of the region, and explains how to best enhance one’s garden or patch of land. It includes helpful tips that will improve the success of any native plantings, particularly when considering sites encompassing the challenging micro-climates found throughout the district. It provides helpful advice to the first time gardener or the seasoned pro. It covers all aspects of planting, including maintenance advice and plant lists, so that even the most amateur gardener can soon have a thriving native patch filled with native bird song. Growing Native Plants in the Wakatipu Published by the Wakatipu Reforestation Trust (WRT) www.wrtqt.org.nz Email: [email protected] First Published 2017 The WRT has many volunteering ©Wakatipu Reforestation Trust 2017 opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnid Ecology in New Zealand, Exploring
    1 Arachnid ecology in New Zealand, exploring 2 unknown and poorly understood factors. 3 James Crofts-Bennett. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 “A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science [1] in Botany [2] at the 21 University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand” 22 2020 23 1 24 Index 25 26 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………5. 27 Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………...7. 28 1.1 The importance of spiders………………………………………………………...7. 29 1.2 The influence of habitat structural complexity on spider distribution and 30 abundance…………………………………………………………………………......8. 31 1.3 Invasive rodents in the context of New Zealand Araneae………………………...9. 32 1.4 Thesis structure and aims………………………………………………………..14. 33 Chapter 2. The effect of habitat structural complexity on spider abundance and diversity..15. 34 2.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………..15. 35 Figure 2.1: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover…………………………...16. 36 Figure 2.2: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover with mistletoe parasites…16. 37 2.2 Methods…………………………………………………………………………17. 38 Figure 2.3: Examples of foliage samples……………………………………18. 39 Table 2.1: Sampling locations, dates and host data…………………………19. 40 2.2.1 Statistical Analyses……………………………………………………………20. 41 2.3 Results…………………………………………………………………………...20. 42 Figure 2.4: Total invertebrates sampled in summer, plotted………………..22. 43 Figure 2.5: Total invertebrates sampled in winter, plotted………………….23. 44 Table 2.2: Paired t-tests of host plant invertebrate populations……………..25. 45 2.4 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….26. 46 Chapter 3. A novel non-kill Araneae trap: test with regards to vegetation type versus 47 location 48 effects………………………………………………………………………………………..28. 49 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………...28.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on Selwyn District Council Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028
    Submission on Selwyn District Council Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028 To: Selwyn District Council Submitter: Community & Public Health A division of the Canterbury District Health Board Attn: Kirsty Peel Community and Public Health C/- Canterbury District Health Board PO Box 1475 Christchurch 8140 Proposal: Selwyn District Council is consulting on their long-term plan to ascertain views on how best to manage infrastructure and services in the district over the next 10 years. Page 1 of 9 Template File Pathway: Y:\CFS\CPHGroups\RMC\SDC\LTP\2018\SelwynLTPSubmissionFinal180503.docx SUBMISSION ON SELWYN DISTRICT COUNCIL DRAFT LONG TERM PLAN Details of submitter 1. Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) 2. The CDHB is responsible for promoting the reduction of adverse environmental effects on the health of people and communities and to improve, promote and protect their health pursuant to the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000 and the Health Act 1956. 3. These statutory obligations are the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and, in the Canterbury District, are carried out under contract by Community and Public Health under Crown funding agreements on behalf of the Canterbury District Health Board. General comments 4. Health and wellbeing (overall quality of life) is influenced by a wide range of factors beyond the health sector. These influences can be described as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age, and are impacted by environmental, social and behavioural factors. They are often referred to as the ‘social determinants of health1. Barton and Grant’s Health Map2 shows how various influences on health are complex and interlinked.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Moments in History
    A4 NEWS Wednesday, February 9, 2011 THE PRESS, Christchurch PROJECT CANTERBURY Selwyn fares Defining moments in history slightly better Marc Greenhill Marc Greenhill In seconds, more than a 150 It makes it so years of Canterbury history Despite being the centre of the came crashing down. earthquake Selwyn District much easier The sight of the Deans was spared widespread dam- when you’ve still family’s Homebush home- age. ‘ stead in ruins was a defining The September 4 quake got your water image of the September epicentre was fortunately on and sewerage. earthquake. sparsely populated farmland Several of the region’s at Charing Cross, between Kelvin Coe Selwyn mayor historic landmarks, which Hororata and Burnham. have over the years been It was only 25 kilometres meticulously restored and from the Selwyn District Lincoln was the 130-year-old protected, may now be too Council’s Rolleston head- Famous Grouse Hotel, which damaged to save. quarters but limited liquefac- has been demolished. A new Bulldozers levelled the tion and newer buildings may pub is among the 43 quake- Homebush homestead, near have helped the district cope related building-consent Darfield, in November. better than areas further applications to the council. Jim and Louise Deans, the north. Fewer than 100 homes The district’s other worst farm’s guardians for the past will have to be rebuilt in the hit area was around Tai Tapu 30 years, said they had no district. and Greenpark, which was time frame for rebuilding and Selwyn mayor Kelvin Coe affected by liquefaction. were still ‘‘very much in the said infrastructure survived A report prepared by planning stages’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Effects of the M W 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake, 4
    New Zealand Journal of Geologyand Geophysics Vol. 55, No. 3, September 2012, 231Á247 1 Hydrological effects of the MW 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake, 4 September 2010, New Zealand SC Coxa*, HK Rutterb, A Simsc, M Mangad, JJ Weirb, T Ezzye,PAWhitef, TW Hortong and D Scotte aGNS Science, Dunedin, New Zealand; bAqualinc Research Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand; cDepartment of Geography, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; dDepartment of Earth and PlanetaryScience, Universityof California, Berkeley,California, USA; eEnvironment Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand; fGNS Science, Taupo, New Zealand; gGeological Sciences, Universityof Canterbury,Christchurch, New Zealand (Received 7 December 2011; final version received 14 March 2012) The MW7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake on 4 September 2010 generated widespread hydrological effects ranging from near-instantaneous coseismic liquefaction and changes of groundwater levels in boreholes, to more sustained (days to weeks) post-seismic changes in spring flow, river discharge and groundwater piezometric levels, to longer term shifts in groundwater level one year after the earthquake. Groundwater piezometric responses include local groundwater level increases of 20 m around the Greendale Fault, particularly in deep aquifers (80 m), whereas decreases occurred in coastal confined aquifers beneath Christchurch city. Increases of up to 5 m persisted within 20 km of the fault 12 h after the earthquake. Groundwater levels and springs were affected throughout New Zealand, from 350 km away in Southland to nearly 1000 km away in Northland, even where shaking intensities were less than Modified Mercalli Intensity (MM) 3Á4 (weak to largely observed) and peak ground acceleration was much B0.01 g. Release of artesian groundwater pressure and groundwater flow are postulated to have played pivotal roles in Christchurch liquefaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Flammability Across the Vascular Plant Phylogeny, with Special Emphasis on the Genus Dracophyllum
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy at Lincoln University by Xinglei Cui Lincoln University 2020 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. Abstract Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum by Xinglei Cui Fire has been part of the environment for the entire history of terrestrial plants and is a common disturbance agent in many ecosystems across the world. Fire has a significant role in influencing the structure, pattern and function of many ecosystems. Plant flammability, which is the ability of a plant to burn and sustain a flame, is an important driver of fire in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has a fundamental role in ecosystem dynamics and species evolution. However, the factors that have influenced the evolution of flammability remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • DHS Dispatch the ISSUE 6 THURSDAY 18 APRIL
    DHS Dispatch The ISSUE 6 THURSDAY 18 APRIL 2013 Calum Gray Selwyn Youth MP Page 2 Rock Climbing in Wanaka Page 8 Thai Exhibition Day Page 5 Cross Country Pages 10-11 Selwyn Youth MP - Calum Gray A few weeks ago, local MP Amy water quality, local public transport Adams came to Darfi eld High School and many other local and national to talk about the position of Youth MP. issues. It is a position that comes up only After we had given our speeches, we once every three years and I went were invited back in one at a time to mostly out of curiosity. However, after be interviewed by the judges so they listening to her speech, I decided I could see how well we could think on might as well apply for the position. our feet. Everybody had the same Each school was allowed to submit three questions: What would we do two candidates and from Darfi eld about youth drinking? How would we the only two applicants were Henry consult the public about the issue we Oliver and me. had given a speech on? and lastly, To decide who would get the position, if we were in government, which Henry and I, alongside seven another portfolio would we take and what high school students from around would our fi rst action as minister be? Selwyn, had to give a fi ve-minute Following this, we waited anxiously speech on one national issue and while the judges deliberated and one local issue that are important to tea and coffee were served.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake
    Presentation of September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake William Godwin, PG, CEG AEG Vice President, 2019-20 Webinar – May 6, 2020 Introduction ► This presentation is on the 2010 Mw 7.1 Canterbury Earthquake. The earthquake occurred as I was traveling from San Francisco to Auckland, New Zealand to attend the IAEG Congress. Upon arrival I was asked to join the Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) team to document damage from the event in the Christchurch area of the South Island. Little did I know that another smaller (Mw 6.2), yet deadlier earthquake would strike 5 months later in close to the same area. Introduction ► The purpose of the GEER is to observe and record earthquake induced phenomena and impacts to infrastructure before evidence is removed or altered as part of cleanup efforts. ► The reconnaissance was conducted by a joint USA-NZ-Japan team with the main funding for the USA contingent coming from GEER and partial support from PEER and EERI. ► This presentation includes my photographs from Sept. 8-10 supplemented with a few photos and observations noted in the GEER report, Nov. 2010. I also describe other seismic events from 2011-16. Sept 4th Darfield Earthquake ► At 4:35 am on September 4th NZ Standard Time (16:35 Sept 3rd UTC) the rupture of a previously unrecognized strike-slip fault (Greendale Fault) beneath the Canterbury Plains of New Zealand’s South Island produced a Mw 7.1 earthquake that caused widespread damage throughout the region. Surprisingly only two people were seriously injured, with approximately 100 total injuries. This compares with 185 deaths in the 2011 event Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Greendale Fault Rupture Characteristics Epicenter (focal) depth: 10.8km Tectonic Setting Ground Motion (pga) Geographical Setting Preliminary Observations ► Rock Avalanche, Castle Rock Reserve, Littleton, Christchurch ► Fault Offset, Telegraph Rd at Grange Rd.
    [Show full text]