DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Correspondence Item #1 Mark Slovick Planning & Development Services County of San Diego 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92123

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Correspondence Item #1 Mark Slovick Planning & Development Services County of San Diego 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92123 1 of 418 June 11, 2020 Public Correspondence Item #1 Mark Slovick Planning & Development Services County of San Diego 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92123 RE: Current Status of Fire Services Agreement for Lilac Hills Ranch Mr. Slovick, The Deer Springs Fire Protection District has not reached a Service Agreement with the Lilac Hills Ranch applicant. The last communication on this topic between the District and the applicant was in March, 2019. As stated in the District’s July 28, 2014, response letter to the Draft Environmental Impact Report, the District maintains its intent to serve the project. Additionally, after reviewing letters to the applicant by San Diego County Fire Authority on January 8, 2020, and Planning & Development Services on May 6, 2020, the District supports the requirement for fuel modification easements along West Lilac Road. Without the easements, the District would be restricted in its ability to enforce the necessary clearance along the planned evacuation route. The 2018 California wildfires have reminded us all that well-maintained evacuation routes are a critical mitigation to entrapment, while also increasing the overall safety of residents. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 749-8001. Sincerely, Bret A. Sealey President 2 of 418 From: [email protected] To: Jimenez, Ann; Barnhart, Douglas; Beck, Michael; Calvo, Yolanda; Edwards, Michael (LUEG); Flannery, Kathleen; Neufeld, Darin; Pallinger, David; Seiler, Michael; Slovick, Mark; Woods, Bryan Subject: New eComment for Planning Commission Hearing Date: Monday, June 8, 2020 10:01:42 PM SpeakUp New eComment for Planning Commission Hearing Alicia Klingler submitted a new eComment. Meeting: Planning Commission Hearing Item: 1. Discussion and Consideration of the Formation of an Ad Hoc Subcommittee for the Lilac Hills Ranch Project and Update of the Fire Safety Determination eComment: We have voted on this multiple times and it has been defeated multiple times. Our community does NOT need more homes and more traffic!!! View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 3 of 418 From: Dan Silver To: Slovick, Mark; Jimenez, Ann Cc: Wardlaw, Mark Subject: Item 1, June 12, 2020, Lilac Hills Ranch Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 11:16:13 AM ALSO SUBMITTED VIA eCOMMENT June 10, 2020 RE: Item 1, Discussion and Consideration of the Formation of an Ad Hoc Subcommittee for the Lilac Hills Ranch Project and Update of the Fire Safety Determination - Opposition Dear Chair and Members of the Commission: After reviewing the hearing materials, Endangered Habitats League (EHL) opposes formation of an Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning Commission. We find no legitimate purpose for it, and its history to date presents various legal and Brown Act concerns. Regarding fire hazard, two points are clear: 1. Required easements for vegetation clearing have not been provided. 2. Above and beyond the easement issue, a Rhode & Associates analysis, undertaken for the Fire Authority and accepted by DPDS, discloses clearly inadequate capacity of egress roads to handle evacuation demand for both the project and surrounding area, with risk of entrapment. Even if easements were provided, the entrapment risk mandates project denial. Given these incontrovertible and un-fixable public safety factors, there is no reason to form the Ad Hoc committee. Parenthetically, we note that similar evacuation risks on other projects have been ignored by this Commission, as well as by the Fire Authority and DPDS. EHL respects the right of the applicant to appeal to the Board, and this is the proper next step. Sincerely, Dan Silver Dan Silver, Executive Director Endangered Habitats League 8424 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite A 592 Los Angeles, CA 90069-4267 213-804-2750 [email protected] https://ehleague.org 4 of 418 From: David Hymer To: Jimenez, Ann Subject: Lilac Hills Ranch Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:43:03 PM I am writing to express my support for this project. San Diego desperately needs new housing. Lilac Hills is a well-planned community designed as one of the first carbon-neutral Villages in the county, meaning that features like solar panels on every home, electric vehicle charging stations in every garage, and investments in renewable resources will reduce all greenhouse gas emissions to zero. It also will provide economic benefits, including new jobs and revenue that are especially needed given the challenges of the pandemic. I urge the planning commission to approve this project. Thank you. David M. Hymer Attention: This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. 5 of 418 From: Diane OToole To: Jimenez, Ann Subject: Lilac Hills Ranch Project Date: Saturday, June 6, 2020 11:53:09 AM To the County Board of Supervisors I am a long-time resident of North County. I am writing this letter to express my concerns regarding the New Lilac Hills Ranch development. I cannot understand why this project located off West Lilac Road in Valley Center continues to be discussed by the County Board of Supervisors for the following reasons: 1. The number one reason is that on November 8 2016, Proposition B was overwhelmingly defeated 63.54% to 36.46%, soundly rejecting the Lilac Hills development. The property owner should abide by the current zoning for the property that allows for approximately 110 homes. 2. San Diego County Voters approved the General Plan for the County and this project does not warrant an amendment to the General Plan per the guidelines within the General Plan. 3. March 2020, Proposition A was narrowly defeated (less than 2%) whereby any new development would have been required to be put before the voters in San Diego County. Are you listening, more and more people want smart growth. The next time this type of initiative goes before the voters it will pass. 4. March 2020, Voters rejected Proposition B Newland Sierra as they recognized a development of that size (2100 homes) in the rural areas of the county is not acceptable. The infrastructure (roads, fire safety measures) to support this massive development does not exist. The Lilac Hills project is in close proximity. 5. We keep hearing about the lack of housing. There are 60,000 approved units in San Diego County. Why are those units (near existing infrastructure) not being built first before determining the future needs of San Diego County? 6. SDSU just last week completed their purchase of the stadium property in Mission Valley and this project will provide an additional 4600 units in an area with existing infrastructure and public transportation. 7. According to the latest data, California growth has slowed dramatically, therefore realistically what are the housing needs and who really needs to be housed; those making less than $50,000. Sadly, these are not the buyers who can afford to purchase in this proposed development. 8. As for the proposed development: a. The roads in the area cannot support the estimated 19,000 additional vehicle trips per day. There is nothing in the developers plans that show they are widening the surrounding roads outside the immediate development. Who will address the impact to Route 395, Circle R Drive, Old Castle Road, and interstate 15? b. The assumption that people will work and live in the community is not realistic. Valley Center does not feature or attract employers that the residents of this community would need to justify housing prices that would START in the 500s. That is not affordable housing. Lack of high paying jobs in the area necessitates traveling to employment (personal vehicle as there is no public transportation). Not all residents are fortunate to be employed by a business that allows or can be run via telecommuting. c. And finally, let’s not play the game the developer promises the units will be affordable. The majority of the units are not affordable nor does the project offset the environmental impacts, with fire safety at the top of the list. We live in a rural area prone to fires and limited escape routes. We do not want to become another Paradise California. I sincerely hope that the Board of Supervisors will put the well-being of its residents ahead of its need to placate the developers. Both parties can benefit from smart planning. Thank you Diane O’Toole 6 of 418 7 of 418 From: [email protected] To: Jimenez, Ann; Barnhart, Douglas; Beck, Michael; Calvo, Yolanda; Edwards, Michael (LUEG); Flannery, Kathleen; Neufeld, Darin; Pallinger, David; Seiler, Michael; Slovick, Mark; Woods, Bryan Subject: New eComment for Planning Commission Hearing Date: Monday, June 8, 2020 12:01:57 PM SpeakUp New eComment for Planning Commission Hearing Donna Thomas submitted a new eComment. Meeting: Planning Commission Hearing Item: 1. Discussion and Consideration of the Formation of an Ad Hoc Subcommittee for the Lilac Hills Ranch Project and Update of the Fire Safety Determination eComment: Please stop the building of lilac hills farm. Huge fire hazard! View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 8 of 418 From: Doug Marquart To: Jimenez, Ann Subject: Lilac Hills proposed project Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 6:03:50 PM Ann Jimenez, My name is Doug Marquart, a resident at 8724 W. Lilac Rd across the street from the proposed Lilac Hills development since 1969. Over those many years my family and I have experienced mostly normal living conditions in and around our neighborhood. Several current and pre-existing conditions in and around the proposed Lilac Hills project have high priorities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2017 North Bay and Southern California Fires: a Case Study
    fire Article The 2017 North Bay and Southern California Fires: A Case Study Nicholas J. Nauslar 1,2,* ID , John T. Abatzoglou 3 ID and Patrick T. Marsh 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA 2 NOAA/NWS/NCEP Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK 73072, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Geography, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 April 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 9 June 2018 Abstract: Two extreme wind-driven wildfire events impacted California in late 2017, leading to 46 fatalities and thousands of structures lost. This study characterizes the meteorological and climatological factors that drove and enabled these wildfire events and quantifies their rarity over the observational record. Both events featured key fire-weather metrics that were unprecedented in the observational record that followed a sequence of climatic conditions that enhanced fine fuel abundance and fuel availability. The North Bay fires of October 2017 occurred coincident with strong downslope winds, with a majority of burned area occurring within the first 12 h of ignition. By contrast, the southern California fires of December 2017 occurred during the longest Santa Ana wind event on record, resulting in the largest wildfire in California’s modern history. Both fire events occurred following an exceptionally wet winter that was preceded by a severe four-year drought. Fuels were further preconditioned by the warmest summer and autumn on record in northern and southern California, respectively. Finally, delayed onset of autumn precipitation allowed for critically low dead fuel moistures leading up to the wind events.
    [Show full text]
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Evacuation Plan
    APPENDIX J2 Evacuation Plan DRAFT Conceptual Wildland Fire Evacuation Plan for the North River Farms Community Prepared for: Oceanside Fire Department 300 North Coast Hwy Oceanside, California 92054 On behalf of Applicant: Integral Communities 2235 Encinitas Blvd., Suite 216 Encinitas, California 92024 Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 June 2018 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Draft Conceptual Wildland Fire Evacuation Plan for The North River Farms Community TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1 QUICK REFERENCE – CONCEPTUAL WILDLAND FIRE EVACUATION PLAN ...................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Nearest Medical Facilities ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Register to Receive Emergency Alerts ................................................................... 9 1.3 Get Involved in Community Readiness .................................................................. 9 1.4 Evacuation Plan Purpose and Limitations ............................................................ 11 2 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................13 3 SAN DIEGO COUNTY EVACUATION PLANNING SUMMARY ..........................15 3.1 Evacuation Objectives .......................................................................................... 16 3.2 Evacuation Coordination Process ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cert Petition
    No. 18-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ Of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Jeffrey N. Boozell Kathleen M. Sullivan QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Counsel of Record & SULLIVAN, LLP Stephanie N. Solomon 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Los Angeles, CA & SULLIVAN, LLP (213) 443-3200 51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 (212) 849-7000 kathleensullivan@ quinnemanuel.com April 30, 2019 Counsel for Petitioner i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether it is an uncompensated taking for public use in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amend- ments for a State to impose strict liaBility for inverse condemnation on a privately owned utility without ensuring that the cost of that liaBility is spread to the Benefitted ratepayers. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING The following were parties to the proceeding Be- fore the California court of appeal: 1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (“SDG&E”), Peti- tioner in this Court, was Petitioner Below. 2. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent in this Court, was Respond- ent Below. 3. Protect Our Communities Foundation was a Real Party in Interest Below. 4. The Utility Reform Network was a Real Party in Interest Below. 5. Utility Consumers Action Network was a Real Party in Interest Below. 6. Ruth Hendricks was a Real Party in Interest Below. 7. San Diego Consumers’ Action Network was a Real Party in Interest Below.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disaster Center Is Dedicated to the Idea That Disaster Mitigation Is
    The Disaster Center is dedicated to the idea that disaster mitigation is cost effective and individuals pursuing their own interest are the greatest potential force for disaster reduction. Please consider making a small donation to the Disaster Center When disaster mitigation is cost effective, we are on the road to bringing disasters to an end. •Daily Operations Briefing •Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:30 a.m. EDT Significant Activity: May 14 – 15 Significant Events: • San Diego County, CA – Fires Significant Weather: • Slight risk of severe thunderstorms – Carolinas & the Mid-Atlantic States • Rain and thunderstorms – Eastern U.S. • Elevated Fire Weather – Southern CA • Red Flag Warnings – CA, & AK • Space Weather: Past 24 hours: none occurred; next 24 hours: none predicted FEMA Readiness: No significant changes Declaration Activity: • Amendment No. 2 to FEMA-4177-DR-FL • FMAGs approved for Poinsettia Fire (FEMA-5054-FM) & Cocos Fire (FEMA-5055-FM) in CA Poinsettia Fire – Carlsbad, California Fire Acres % Structures Lost / Fatalities / Location Est. Full Containment FMAG Name burned Contained Threatened Injuries Carlsbad, CA FEMA-5054-FM-CA Poinsettia Fire 250 50% N/A 11 / 2,600 0 / 0 (San Diego County) Approved May 14 Situation • Fire began May 14 in Carlsbad CA (pop. 105,328) Impacts • Evacuations implemented for 15,000 residents & 4 public schools • As of 10:40 pm PDT: Portions of the evacuations are being lifted • 8 homes, 18-unit apartment complex & 2 commercial structures have been damaged/destroyed • Palomar Airport lost power/on generator • 2,500 homes, 100 businesses, an amusement park and local schools Source: CAL FIRE threatened • Two ARC Shelters opened with 75 occupants (NSS Shelter Report May 15) Response • Reverse 911 implemented to notify approximately 11,627 homes • CA Southern Regional EOC is at Level 1 (Full Activation) • Governor declared State of Emergency for San Diego County, May 14 Cocos Fire – San Marcos, California Fire Acres % Structures Lost / Fatalities / Location Est.
    [Show full text]
  • WECC Wildfire Presentation July 2020
    Wildfire Events and Utility Responses in California Joseph Merrill, Emergency Response Staff July 24, 2020 Overview I. Presentation: Wildfire Events and Utility Responses in California • Major Wildfires in 2007 and 2017-2019 • Electricity System Causes and Utility Responses • Public Safety Power Shutoffs II. Reference Slides: California’s Transmission Planning Process • California Independent System Operator • California Public Utilities Commission • California Energy Commission 2 Extreme Wind-Driven Fire “In October 2007, Santa Ana winds swept across Southern California and caused dozens of wildfires. The conflagration burned 780 square miles, killed 17 people, and destroyed thousands of homes and buildings. Hundreds of thousands of people were evacuated at the height of the fires. Transportation was disrupted over a large area for several days, including many road closures. Portions of the electric power network, public communication systems, and community water sources were destroyed.” California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision 12-04-024 April 19, 2012 3 2007: Rice and Guejito/Witch Fires Destructive Fires occur in San Diego County Rice Fire (9,472 acres) • Caused by SDG&E lines not adequately distanced from vegetation • One of the most destructive CA fires of 2007, destroying 248 structures Guejito and Witch Fires (197,990 acres) • Caused by dead tree limb falling on SDG&E infrastructure and delay in de-energizing power line • Most destructive CA fire of 2007, killing 2 people and destroying 1141 homes 4 5 6 SDG&E Response
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Pacific Southwest Chapter
    The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Pacific Southwest Chapter Emmy® Award Nominations May 2018 Newscast - Evening - Larger Markets Noticias Univision Nevada - Masacre en Las Vegas, Gabriel Preciado, Juan Ulises Juarez, Nathaly Alcala, Jasmina Gonzalez, Angel Covarrubias, KINC O.J. Simpson Granted Parole, Christianne Klein, KLAS 10News at 7:00pm: Storm Pounds San Diego, Michael Rozzen, KGTV Chargers Leave San Diego, Louis Weiner, Barbara Richards, Dean Elwood, CBS News 8 Breaking News, One October Mass Shooting, Mark Neerman, Dree De Clamecy, Kenny Ramis, Gerard Ramalho, Latoya Silmon, Reed Abplanalp-Cowan, Nathan O'Neal, Amanda Marie Polito, Robert Guerrero, Julia Romero Minnix, Christy Douglas, Ryan Goodman, Stephanie Wheatley, KSNV 1 October Aftermath, Suzanne Herman, Ryan Dunn, Fox 5 Las Vegas The Now San Diego: Chain Reaction Water Main Break, Malcolm Hoyle, Ariel Wesler, KGTV Tragedy in Las Vegas, Tessie Sanchez, Mike Dello Stritto, Tricia Kean, Bryan Scofield, Carla Wade, KTNV 10News at 11:00pm: Lilac Fire Tears through San Diego, Lori Rosehart, Sarah Cowan, Brian Shlonsky, Bree Steffen, Anthony Pura, Rayan Graham, Kimberly Hunt, KGTV Noticiero Telemundo 20, Cuenta Con Nosotros, Diana Diaz, Judith Equihua, Pablo Zamora, Rigoberto Villalobos, Ana Cristina Sanchez, Victor Rodriguez Tafoya, Guadalupe Venegas, Lizzet Lopez, MJ Acosta, Dita Quinones, Telemundo 20 11pm KSNV One October, Ryan Goodman, Marie Mortera, Gerard Ramalho, Ken Takahashi, KSNV Newscast - Evening - Smaller Markets 17 News at 5pm - A Fallen
    [Show full text]
  • MABAS WISCONSIN Mutual Aid Box Alarm System Division 114 Serving Oneida County, Wisconsin
    MABAS WISCONSIN Mutual Aid Box Alarm System Division 114 Serving Oneida County, Wisconsin MABAS Communication Drill: A MABAS Communication Drill was conducted prior to the MABAS meeting. Participants included dispatch staff and MABAS members traveling to the meeting. Meeting Minutes 10-9-13, Little Rice Fire Department Departments Present: Cassian Fire Department Crescent Fire Department Hazelhurst Fire Department Lake Tomahawk Fire Department Little Rice Fire Department Minocqua Fire Department Newbold Fire Department Nokomis Fire Department Pelican Fire Department Fire Dist. ALPHA Pine Lake Fire Department Sugar Camp Fire Department Woodruff Fire Department Oneida County Dispatch Oneida County Emergency Management Willow Region Additional Attendees: Tomahawk FD Approve Meeting Minutes: Chief Kinnally requested a change in the August 14th, 2013 Meeting Minutes to reflect the location as Rhinelander Fire Department. Motion by: Greg Eatherly (Pelican FD), second by Steve Siefert (Newbold FD) to amend the August 14th, 2013 MABAS Division 114 Meeting Minutes to reflect the location as Rhinelander Fire Department and approve. Motion Passed. Treasurer’s Report: Date Check Description Amount Balance 08/14/13 Beginning Balance $785.05 08/14/13 1000 Little Rice Fire Department $100.00 $685.05 09/27/13 1001 H&H Septic $80.00 $605.05 09/28/13 1002 Little Rice Fire Department $150.00 $455.05 10/9/13 Ending Balance $455.05 Motion by: Steve Siefert (Newbold FD), second by Jake Lobermeier (Crescent FD) to approve the MABAS Division 114 Treasurer’s Report. Motion Passed. 1 OLD BUSINESS: Radio Drill while en-route to Meeting: Radio drill went well, dispatch sounded good, Chief Kinnally called and spoke with E911 Telecommunicator Pequet and reminded her to move to the next resource if one is not available, the strike-out should be done on IFERN frequency only and relayed that she did a nice job.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Declarations in California
    Disaster Declarations in California (BOLD=Major Disaster) (Wildfires are Highlighted) 2018 DR-4353 Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows, And Debris Flows Declared on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 - 06:00 FM-5244 Pawnee Fire Declared on Sunday, June 24, 2018 - 07:11 FM-5245 Creek Fire Declared on Monday, June 25, 2018 - 07:11 2017 DR-4301 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 13:15 EM-3381 Potential Failure of the Emergency Spillway at Lake Oroville Dam Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:20 DR-4302 Severe Winter Storm Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:30 DR-4305 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 04:48 DR-4308 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Mudslides Declared on Saturday, April 1, 2017 - 16:55 DR-4312 Flooding Declared on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 - 14:00 FM-5189 Wall Fire Declared on Sunday, July 9, 2017 - 14:18 FM-5192 Detwiler Fire Declared on Monday, July 17, 2017 - 19:23 DR-4344 Wildfires Declared on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 08:40 2016 FM-5124 Old Fire Declared on Saturday, June 4, 2016 - 21:55 FM-5128 Border 3 Fire Declared on Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:03 FM-5129 Fish Fire Declared on Monday, June 20, 2016 - 20:35 FM-5131 Erskine Fire Declared on Thursday, June 23, 2016 - 20:57 FM-5132 Sage Fire Declared on Saturday, July 9, 2016 - 18:15 FM-5135 Sand Fire Declared on Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 17:34 FM-5137 Soberanes Fire Declared on Thursday, July 28, 2016 - 16:38 FM-5140 Goose Fire Declared on Saturday, July 30, 2016 - 20:48
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Services Operational Assessment
    OTAY RANCH VILLAGE RESORT Village 13 FIRE SERVICES OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for the San Diego County Fire Authority, by: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Feb. 1, 2020 Table of Contents Page The Project 2 Analysis Approach 2 Site Characterization 4 Climate 4 Fire History 5 Wildfire Factors 7 Offshore Winds 7 Onshore Winds 7 Fuels 8 Topography 8 Fire Behavior 9 Rate of Spread 9 Worst-Case Fire Trajectory 1 0 Spotting and Fire Branding 1 0 Fire Ignition Sources 11 Fire Modeling 11 Public Safety Actions 1 1 Evacuation 12 Temporary Safe Refuge 12 Public Safety Action Points 13 Emergency Messaging 13 Evacuation Center Locations 13 Fire Services 14 Fire Services Providers 14 Fire Service Response 15 Response Time Analysis 15 Compaction of Development 16 I mplications for Wildfire Operations 1 7 Potential Worst-Case Loss 17 Development Wildfire Resistance 19 Water Systems 19 Construction 19 Fuel Modification 20 Additional Measures 21 Summary of Findings 22 Significant Changes 23 References 24 The Project Otay Ranch Resort Village- Village 13 is a proposed planned community development, immediately north of Lower Otay Lake and east of the City of Chula Vista, California. This report collectively refers to the project as “Village 13”. The Project consists of a maximum of 1,938 residential units (1,881 single-family units and 57 multifamily units), 40,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 10.1-acre school site, 25.1 acres of public/private parks, a 6.1 acre homeowners’ association neighborhood facility, a 2.3- acre joint use site for fire station and sheriff storefront, 9.0 miles of multi-use community trails and pathways, 790.3 acres of preserve/open space land to be conveyed to Otay Ranch Resource Management Preserve, an additional 69.3 acres of biological open space, and 76.4 acres of internal open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Agreement
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission’s Own Motion into the I.19-06-015 Maintenance, Operations and Practices of (Filed June 27, 2019) Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U39E) with Respect to its Electric Facilities; and Order to Show Cause Why the Commission Should not Impose Penalties and/or Other Remedies for the Role PG&E’s Electrical Facilities had in Igniting Fires in its Service Territory in 2017. JOINT MOTION OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 39 E), THE SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES, AND THE OFFICE OF THE SAFETY ADVOCATE FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PUBLIC VERSION (ATTACHMENTS 1-7 AND 9-13 CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION) AMY C. YIP-KIKUGAWA ALYSSA KOO EMILY FISHER ELLIOTT SEALS CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMMISSION COMPANY 505 Van Ness Avenue Law Department San Francisco, California 94102 77 Beale Street, B30A Telephone: (415) 703-1327 San Francisco, California 94105 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (415) 973-4590 Facsimile: (415) 973-0516 Attorneys for the Email: [email protected] SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION Email: [email protected] RACHAEL E. KOSS JOSHUA HILL ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CHRISTINE Y. WONG CARDOZO MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 601 Gateway Blvd, Suite 1000 425 Market Street South San Francisco, California 94080 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (650) 589-1660 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (650) 589-4062 Facsimile: (415) 772-7522 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorneys for COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY Attorneys for EMPLOYEES PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY REBECCA VORPE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 703-4443 Email: [email protected] Attorney for the OFFICE OF THE SAFETY ADVOCATE Dated: December 17, 2019 Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]