DOCSLIB.ORG

Body Integrity Identity Disorder and Cyborgs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Body Integrity Identity Disorder and Cyborgs Body Integrity Identity Disorder and Cyborgs: An Exploration of the Ethics of Elective Amputation and Enhancement Technologies A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Bioethics and Medical Jurisprudence in the Faculty of Humanities 2021 Richard B. Gibson Centre for Social Ethics and Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARIES ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 6 DECELERATION AND COPYRIGHT STATEMENT.............................................................. 7 DECLARATION ......................................................................................................................... 7 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT....................................................................................................... 7 DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... 9 THE AUTHOR ............................................................................................................................. 10 EDUCATION ............................................................................................................................ 10 PUBLICATIONS AND CONFERENCE PAPERS .................................................................. 10 DESTINATION ........................................................................................................................... 12 TABLE OF STATUTES ............................................................................................................... 13 TABLE OF CASES ....................................................................................................................... 14 PART I INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I THE QUESTION ................................................................................................... 17 CHAPTER II BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER: AN OVERVIEW .................... 24 2.1 BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER AND GENDER DYSPHORIA ................... 32 CHAPTER III PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND ...................................... 34 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 34 3.2 AUTONOMY AND THE CAPACITY FOR CONSENT .................................................. 35 3.3 BENEFICENCE ................................................................................................................... 39 3.4 NONMALEFICENCE ......................................................................................................... 52 3.5 JUSTICE ............................................................................................................................... 62 3.6 THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE OF HEALTHY LIMB AMPUTATION IN CASES OF BIID .................................................................................................................................................... 65 3.7 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 83 CHAPTER IV PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL APPROACH .............................................. 91 4.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 91 4.2 WHY HEALTH, DISABILITY, AND NEUROPROSTHETICS? ...................................... 91 2 4.3 BACKGROUND ASSUMPTIONS AND GROUNDING PRINCIPLES .......................... 92 4.4 THE EMPIRICAL, THE SOCIAL, THE NORMAL, AND THE PATHOLOGICAL ...... 96 4.5 ETHICS, LAW, AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LEGISLATION .................................... 119 4.6 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 126 PART II THE ARTICLES CHAPTER V ARTICLE ONE: THE DESIRABILITY OF DIFFERENCE: GEORGES CANGUILHEM AND BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER ................................. 130 5.1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ 130 5.2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 130 5.3 BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER .................................................................... 134 5.4 THE NORMAL AND THE IDEAL .................................................................................. 138 5.5 BOORSE AND CANGUILHEM ...................................................................................... 141 5.6 HOW DO THESE TWO ACCOUNTS UNDERSTAND AND TACKLE DISABILITY? .................................................................................................................................................. 143 5.7 HEALTHY LIMB AMPUTATION AND CANGUILHEM ............................................ 145 5.8 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 147 CHAPTER VI ARTICLE TWO: ELECTIVE IMPAIRMENT MINUS ELECTIVE DISABILITY: THE SOCIAL MODEL OF DISABILITY AND BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER ............................................................................................................ 149 6.1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ 149 6.2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 149 6.3 NONMALEFICENCE AND BIID .................................................................................... 152 6.4 THE SOCIAL MODEL OF DISABILITY ......................................................................... 157 6.5 THE SOCIAL MODEL OF DISABILITY AND ELECTIVE AMPUTATIONS .............. 159 6.6 THE CREATION OF DISABILITY IN CASES OF BIID ................................................. 160 6.7 THE CREATION OF IMPAIRMENT IN CASES OF BIID ............................................. 161 6.8 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 168 CHAPTER VII ARTICLE THREE: ELECTIVE AMPUTATION AND NEUROPROSTHETIC LIMBS ................................................................................................ 170 7.1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ 170 7.2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 170 3 7.3 HEALTHY LIMB AMPUTATIONS AND BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER .................................................................................................................................................. 172 7.4 NEUROPROSTHETICS: WHERE ARE WE NOW AND WHERE ARE WE GOING? 181 7.5 ELECTIVE AMPUTATION AND NEUROPROSTHETIC LIMBS ................................ 183 7.6 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 187 CHAPTER VIII ARTICLE FOUR: NO HARM, NO FOUL? BODY INTEGRITY IDENTITY DISORDER AND THE METAPHYSICS OF GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM ..................... 189 8.1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ 189 8.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 190 8.2 CURRENT ATTITUDES TO THE HARM COMPONENT OF GBH IN ENGLISH LAW .................................................................................................................................................. 192 8.3 WHY THE CLARITY OF HARM IS NEEDED ............................................................... 195 8.4 BIID AND THE SMITH AMPUTATIONS ...................................................................... 197 8.5 METAPHYSICS OF HARM IN GBH ............................................................................... 201 8.6 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 215 PART III CONCLUSION CHAPTER IX CONCLUSION ................................................................................................. 219 9.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 219 9.2 PRINCIPAL ARGUMENTS ............................................................................................. 224 9.3 CONTRIBUTION TO THE LITERATURE ...................................................................... 230 9.4 FUTURE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 233 9.5 CLOSING REMARKS ....................................................................................................... 234 APPENDIX A. ............................................................................................................................ 237 APPENDIX B. ............................................................................................................................. 249 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intersex, Discrimination and the Healthcare Environment – a Critical Investigation of Current English Law
    Intersex, Discrimination and the Healthcare Environment – a Critical Investigation of Current English Law Karen Jane Brown Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of London Metropolitan University for the Award of PhD Year of final Submission: 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents......................................................................................................................i Table of Figures........................................................................................................................v Table of Abbreviations.............................................................................................................v Tables of Cases........................................................................................................................vi Domestic cases...vi Cases from the European Court of Human Rights...vii International Jurisprudence...vii Tables of Legislation.............................................................................................................viii Table of Statutes- England…viii Table of Statutory Instruments- England…x Table of Legislation-Scotland…x Table of European and International Measures...x Conventions...x Directives...x Table of Legislation-Australia...xi Table of Legislation-Germany...x Table of Legislation-Malta...x Table of Legislation-New Zealand...xi Table of Legislation-Republic of Ireland...x Table of Legislation-South Africa...xi Objectives of Thesis................................................................................................................xii
    [Show full text]
  • Business Law, Fifth Edition
    BUSINESS LAW Fifth Edition This book is supported by a Companion Website, created to keep Business Law up to date and to provide enhanced resources for both students and lecturers. Key features include: ◆ termly updates ◆ links to useful websites ◆ links to ‘ebooks’ for introductory and further reading ◆ ‘ask the author’ – your questions answered www.cavendishpublishing.com/businesslaw BUSINESS LAW Fifth Edition David Kelly, PhD Principal Lecturer in Law Staffordshire University Ann Holmes, M Phil, PGD Dean of the Law School Staffordshire University Ruth Hayward, LLB, LLM Senior Lecturer in Law Staffordshire University Fifth edition first published in Great Britain 2005 by Cavendish Publishing Limited, The Glass House, Wharton Street, London WC1X 9PX, United Kingdom Telephone: + 44 (0)20 7278 8000 Facsimile: + 44 (0)20 7278 8080 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cavendishpublishing.com Published in the United States by Cavendish Publishing c/o International Specialized Book Services, 5804 NE Hassalo Street, Portland, Oregon 97213-3644, USA Published in Australia by Cavendish Publishing (Australia) Pty Ltd 3/303 Barrenjoey Road, Newport, NSW 2106, Australia Email: [email protected] Website: www.cavendishpublishing.com.au © Kelly, D, Holmes, A and Hayward, R 2005 First edition 1995 Second edition 1997 Third edition 2000 Fourth edition 2002 Fifth edition 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of Cavendish Publishing Limited, or as expressly permitted by law, or under the terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Law School London: Sweet & Maxwell
    Amicus Curiae The Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies Inside ... Special issue: ‘Reflecting on Blackstone’s Tower’ Introduction Read more on pag e 311 Articles Read more on pag e 314 Notes Read more on pag e 501 News and Events Read more on pag e 523 Contributors’ Profiles Read more on pag e 526 Visual Law Read more on pag e 531 Series 2, Vol 2, No 3 310 Amicus Curiae CONTENTS Special Issue: ‘Reflecting on Blackstone’s Tower’ Guest Editors: Fiona Cownie & Emma Jones Editor’s Introduction Notes Michael -Palmer . 311 The Independent Panel’s Report on Special Issue Articles Judicial Review (CP 407) and the Government’s Consultation Document Blackstone’s Tower in Context on Judicial Review Reform (CP 408) Fiona-Cownie & Emma-Jones Patrick -J- Birkinshaw . 501 . 314 University of London Refugee Law Twining’s Tower and the Challenges of Clinic Online Launch Making Law a Humanistic Discipline Carl -Stychin . 521 David-Sugarman .. 334 The Tower News and Events Completion of IALS Anthony-Bradney . 352 Transformation Project . 523 Rutland Revisited: Reflections on Georg Schwarzenberger Prize . the Relationships between the Legal 524 Academy and the Legal Profession IALS Library . 524 Steven-Vaughan . 371 Selected Upcoming Events . 524 Experiencing English Law Schools: Contributors’ Profiles . 526 The Student Perspective Visual Law Jessica-Guth, Fiona-Cownie China’s Three Internet Courts & Emma-Jones . .. 390 Yang-Lin . 531 Building Access Routes into Blackstone’s Tower: Including Disability Perspectives in the Liberal Law School Amicus Curiae Contacts Abigail-Pearson .. 406 Editor: Professor Michael Palmer, SOAS and IALS, University of Should We Rethink the Purposes of London the Law School? A Case for Decolonial Thought in Legal Pedagogy Production Editor: Marie Selwood Foluke-Adebisi .
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional and Administrative Law Palgrave Law Masters
    Palgrave Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative Law Palgrave Law Masters Company Law Janet Dine and Marios Koutsias Constitutional and Administrative Law John Alder and Keith Syrett Contract Law Ewan McKendrick Criminal Law Jonathan Herring Employment Law Deborah J Lockton Evidence Raymond Emson Family Law Paula Davies and Paven Basuita Intellectual Property Law Tina Hart, Linda Fazzani and Simon Clark Land Law Mark Davys Landlord and Tenant Law Margaret Wilkie, Peter Luxton, Jill Morgan and Godfrey Cole Legal Method Ian McLeod Legal Theory Ian McLeod Medical Law Jo Samanta and Ash Samanta Sports Law Mark James Torts Alastair Mullis, Ken Oliphant and Sandy Steel Trusts Law Charlie Webb and Tim Akkouh If you would like to comment on this book, or on the series generally, please write to [email protected]. Palgrave Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative Law John Alder Emeritus Professor of Law, Newcastle University Keith Syrett Professor of Public Health Law, Cardiff University Eleventh edition © John Alder 1989, 1994, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013 and 2015 © John Alder and Keith Syrett 2017 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. Crown Copyright material is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.
    [Show full text]
  • (GIGI) FENSTER a Thesis Submitted to the Victoria University
    FEVERISH SELF-INDUCED FEVER AND THE CREATIVE MIND BY GIOVANNA (GIGI) FENSTER A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington (2016) ABSTRACT This thesis is a hybrid work that combines the critical and creative components of the Creative Writing PhD in a novel, Feverish. It includes notes, an afterword, and a full bibliography. Feverish is a novel narrated by Gigi, a writer who wishes to induce a fever in herself. The thesis aims to present more than a fictional account of a quest for fever. It aims, rather to travel with the mind of the protagonist. Gigi is not exclusively engaged in quest-related transactions in her present. Her interest in fever moves her to consider events from her past and her upbringing in Apartheid South Africa. It reminds her of a teenaged fascination with brain fever in Wuthering Heights. It prompts her to research fever-related aspects of psychiatric history and Jewish history. It drives her to research the law on consent to self-harm. As Gigi’s interest in fever leads her to these and other topics, so the thesis follows her, so the form adapts. In both its form and its content, Feverish presents a view into a mind. It provides glimpses of the events that shaped the mind. It describes where the mind goes when in the single-minded grip of a quasi-fever. The novel contains strands of theory, memoir, creative non-fiction, ficto-criticism. These different forms are layered upon each other.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 809 Tuesday No. 166 5 January 2021 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS Retirement of a Member: Lord Cavendish of Furness Announcement ....................................................................................................................1 Questions P&O Ferries .......................................................................................................................2 Obesity ...............................................................................................................................5 Housing: Leasehold............................................................................................................9 Education: Turing Scheme ...............................................................................................11 House of Lords Appointments Commission Private Notice Question ....................................................................................................15 Domestic Abuse Bill Second Reading................................................................................................................19 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates,
    [Show full text]
  • Consenting Adults in Private: in Search of the Sexual Subject
    1 Consenting Adults in Private: in Search of the Sexual Subject Thesis submitted by Kate Gleeson in fulfilment of the requirements for a Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Politics and International Relations at the University of New South Wales 2 Even I must understand it (Bertolt Brecht’s donkey)* * On Brecht’s desk stood a writing-aid in the shape of a toy donkey with a sign around its neck that read ‘even I must understand it’ (Eyre & Wright: 2000: 214). Abstract In this thesis I examine the ways in which the modern state addresses sex. I want to ascertain by what considerations the state is informed in its relationship to sex. What is behind the state’s regulation of sexual practices? What is its interest in regard to sex? To answer these questions I examine fundamental artefacts of the modern state, especially the law (but also the bureaucracy), as directed by Brown. Brown involves the search for the sexual subject; The Lords in Brown were at a loss for how to conceptualise the sexual subject before them. Their search is my own: who is the sexual subject? What is his relationship to the state? To answer these questions, Brown directs me for authority to two widely separated moments of supposed classic ‘discontinuity’: the 1957 Wolfenden Report, and the late-Victorian Queen’s Bench. These two moments in government - the 1960s and the 1880s - are usually depicted as ideologically different, indicating discontinuity, difference, change and perhaps even revolution between the relative approaches of the state to sex. And yet, in Brown, both are upheld as appropriate contemporary authorities on sex, the individual and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Commissions Act 1965
    Modernising Communications Offences A final report HC 547 Law Com No 399 (Law Com No 399) Modernising Communications Offences Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20th July 2021 HC 547 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications. ISBN 978-1-5286-2771-9 CCS0621857840 07/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office I The Law Commission The Law Commission was set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Green, Chairman Professor Nick Hopkins Nicholas Paines QC Professor Sarah Green Professor Penney Lewis The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Phil Golding. The Law Commission is located at 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne's Gate, London SW1H 9AG. The terms of this report were agreed on 30th June 2021. The text of this report is available on the Law Commission's website at http://www.lawcom.gov.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence and the Male Victim
    Plymouth Law Review (2020) DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE MALE VICTIM: A STUDY OF THE PREVALENCE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN HOMOSEXUAL MALE PARTNERSHIPS, AND THE LAWS AND SOCIAL POLICIES THAT EXIST TO CONTROL AND PREVENT IT Adam Richards1 Abstract Gay men’s domestic violence (DV) is not a new problem, just a newly recognised one. DV has been seen as a ‘gendered’ issue that only affects heterosexual couples where a female is always perceived as the victim, with the perpetrator always a male. Victims, especially males, find it hard to seek help and advice, and struggle to report this such crimes. This article explores the problem of violence in the home and how it affects same-sex relationships, focusing primarily on homosexual males. It examines the current incidence of DV and includes comparisons with lesbian and heterosexual couples. Modern day perceptions are investigated with a brief history of the law and assessment of legislation testing whether it provides a suitable and adequate framework in relation to the reporting and prosecution of DV in England and Wales. Keywords: Domestic Violence, Domestic Abuse, Male Victims, Intimate Partner Violence, Violence Against Men, Gay Male Victims Introduction The emergence of Domestic Violence(DV) as a public concern is relatively recent. Previously it was regarded as a private matter that should be resolved in the home discouraging any outside involvement.2 The majority of DV takes place against women which is not to say that men are never subject to it.3 DV and abuse accounts for a significant proportion of dark crime, mainly because victims are wary of reporting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Flag, European and English Law: New Developments on Sexuality and Equality
    THE RAINBOW FLAG, EUROPEAN AND ENGLISH LAW: NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON SEXUALITY AND EQUALITY Philip Britton" I. INTRODUCTION These are exciting times to be an observer of the legal scene in the United Kingdom, if your focus is on the rights and protections accorded to lesbians and gay men. During the last twelve months, there have been at least two significant legal victories for lesbians and gay men seeking legal protection: one on adoption and the other on equalizing the age of consent between homosexual and heterosexual young adults. At the governmental level, at least two major policy initiatives have led or will lead in the short term to significant improvements in the legal status of gay men and lesbians. Not only that, but these changes reflect in miniature wider movements within the English legal system, including a re-working of the relationship between the primary sources of law (which now include the ever-increasing scope of European law, as well as traditional legislation passed by Parliament) and the judiciary. If you take the view that the way a country treats its minorities is an important test of its humanity and maturity as a society, then you will welcome these developments. But the United Kingdom has until this recent flurry of changes had one of the worst records within Europe,1 not just of failure in legal terms to offer any protection to lesbians and gay men against discrimination and homophobia but of examples of both discrimination and homophobia inherent in both the law and the legal system.2 Positively, these * LL.B.
    [Show full text]