DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Tennessee Annual Monitoring Network Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Tennessee Annual Monitoring Network Plan 2020 Tennessee Annual Monitoring Network Plan Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Air Pollution Control Division July 1, 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan Acronym Glossary ................................................................................ 5 Introduction to the 2020/21 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for Tennessee ............................................ 6 Proposed Revisions to Tennessee’s Ambient Air Monitoring Network .......................................................... 7 The Purpose of Tennessee’s Ambient Air Monitoring Network ..................................................................... 8 Air Quality Index Reporting ...................................................................................................................................................8 PM2.5 Monitoring .....................................................................................................................................................................9 PM2.5 Continuous Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................9 PM2.5 Background and Transport Sites ........................................................................................................................... 10 PM10 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Ozone Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring ................................................................................................................................... 11 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Monitoring ................................................................................................................................... 12 SO2 Monitors ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Lead (Pb) Monitoring: .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 National Core Monitoring Station...................................................................................................................................... 13 Near-Road Monitors: ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) monitoring: ............................................................................................ 14 Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) ............................................................................................................ 14 Monitoring Sites and Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 15 Freels Bend – Anderson County ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Maryville – Blount County ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Dyersburg – Dyer County.................................................................................................................................................... 18 New Market – Jefferson County ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Loretto – Lawrence County (New) ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Loudon – Loudon County ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Athens – McMinn County .................................................................................................................................................... 22 Jackson – Madison County (New) ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Columbia – Maury County .................................................................................................................................................. 24 Clarksville – Montgomery County (New) ........................................................................................................................... 25 2 TN Ambient Air Monitoring Plan | 2020 Cookeville – Putnam County .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Harriman – Roane County .................................................................................................................................................. 27 Kingsport (PM2.5) – Sullivan County ................................................................................................................................... 28 Blountville – Sullivan County .............................................................................................................................................. 29 Kingsport O3 – Sullivan County .......................................................................................................................................... 30 Exide – Sullivan County ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 Ross N Robinson – Sullivan County ................................................................................................................................... 32 Skyland Dr. – Sullivan County ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Andrew Johnson Elementary School – Sullivan County .................................................................................................. 34 Happy Hill – Sullivan County ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Hendersonville - Sumner County ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Cedars of Lebanon – Wilson County ................................................................................................................................. 38 National Park Service Monitors ......................................................................................................................................... 39 Cades Cove – Blount County (GSM NP)............................................................................................................................. 40 Look Rock – Blount County (GSM NP) ............................................................................................................................... 41 Cove Mountain – Sevier Country (GSM NP) ...................................................................................................................... 42 Clingman’s Dome – Sevier County (GSM NP) ................................................................................................................... 43 Tennessee Geographic Regions, Descriptions and Climate .......................................................................... 44 Map of Tennessee Geographic Regions ........................................................................................................................... 47 Climate Synopsis for Tennessee ........................................................................................................................................ 48 3-Yr (2017-2019) Wind Rose Data for 10 TN Area ASOS Stations .............................................................................. 49 Combined/Metropolitan/Micropolitan Statistical Areas of Tennessee ........................................................................ 57 Appendix A DAPC Monitoring Equipment Evaluation 2020 ..................................................................... 59 Appendix B Tennessee Monitoring Site Agreement Letters .................................................................... 66 Virginia................................................................................................................................................................................... 68 Shelby County – TN - AR - MS ............................................................................................................................................. 70 Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Knoxville Area Per Capita Income Was $37,864, a 5.6 Percent Increase
    Income In 2012, Knox County’s per capita personal income (PCPI) was eighth highest in the state at $38,752, a decrease of less than one percent from 2011, while at the MSA level, Knoxville Area per capita income was $37,864, a 5.6 percent increase. In 2012, state PCPI grew 5.9 percent to $38,734. Th e 2003 to 2012 average annual growth rate of PCPI in Knox County was 3.0 percent. Taxes Residential property in Tennessee is assessed at 25 percent of appraised value, and commercial/industrial property is assessed at 40 percent. Th e current property tax rate Facts & Figures for Knox County residents is $2.32 per $100 assessed value. Th e assessment in the City of Knoxville is $2.39 per $100. City residents pay both property taxes. 2014 TRANSPORTATON State sales tax is 5.5 percent on food and food ingredients and Airlines ...............................................................6 7 percent on all other tangible Allegiant Air, American Eagle, Delta, personal property. Th e local rate, Frontier, United Express, USAirways Express Location and Climate Daily fl ights ........................over 140 per day applicable countywide, is 2.25 percent, bringing the total sales Founded in 1791 where the French Broad and Holston Rivers meet to form the Air Passengers ..............................1,676,374 tax in Knox County to 9.25 Tennessee River, Knoxville is the largest city in East Tennessee, ranking third percent. About 60 percent of the statewide with a metropolitan population of 852,715. Last year the Knoxville Air Services - 2013 local portion goes to the Knox County School system, the remainder dedicated to metropolitan statistical area, as defi ned by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Topography Along the Virginia-Kentucky Border
    Preface: Topography along the Virginia-Kentucky border. It took a long time for the Appalachian Mountain range to attain its present appearance, but no one was counting. Outcrops found at the base of Pine Mountain are Devonian rock, dating back 400 million years. But the rocks picked off the ground around Lexington, Kentucky, are even older; this limestone is from the Cambrian period, about 600 million years old. It is the same type and age rock found near the bottom of the Grand Canyon in Colorado. Of course, a mountain range is not created in a year or two. It took them about 400 years to obtain their character, and the Appalachian range has a lot of character. Geologists tell us this range extends from Alabama into Canada, and separates the plains of the eastern seaboard from the low-lying valleys of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Some subdivide the Appalachians into the Piedmont Province, the Blue Ridge, the Valley and Ridge area, and the Appalachian plateau. We also learn that during the Paleozoic era, the site of this mountain range was nothing more than a shallow sea; but during this time, as sediments built up, and the bottom of the sea sank. The hinge line between the area sinking, and the area being uplifted seems to have shifted gradually westward. At the end of the Paleozoric era, the earth movement are said to have reversed, at which time the horizontal layers of the rock were uplifted and folded, and for the next 200 million years the land was eroded, which provided material to cover the surrounding areas, including the coastal plain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
    The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a Land Classification System and Its Application to the Management of Tennessee’S State Forests
    DESCRIPTION OF A LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF TENNESSEE’S STATE FORESTS Glendon W. Smalley, S. David Todd, and K. Ward Tarkington III1 Abstract—The Tennessee Division of Forestry has adopted a land classification system developed by the senior author as the basic theme of information for the management of its 15 state forests (162,371 acres) with at least 1 in each of 8 physio- graphic provinces. This paper summarizes the application of the system to six forests on the Cumberland Plateau. Landtypes are the most detailed level in the hierarchical system and represent distinct units of the landscape (mapped at a scale of 1:24,000) as defined by physiography, climate, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Each of the 39 landtypes are described in terms of geographic setting, dominant soils, parent material, depth to bedrock, soil texture, soil drainage, relative soil water supply, relative fertility, and forest type. Additional information includes species suitable, site productivity, and operability for management activities. The maps aid the delineation of stands, streamside management zones, and “conservation” and other special use areas; the location of rare, threaten and endangered (RTE) species; the design of harvests; and the modeling of future forest conditions. The landtypes are an integral element in modeling wildlife habitat, in siting game food plots, and planning other wildlife management activities, particularly on forests that are dual wildlife and forest management areas. The maps are excellent training devices and extremely useful in explaining management plans to legislators and the public. INTRODUCTION The five levels of Smalley’s system proceeding from the least- The Tennessee Division of Forestry (TDF) has adopted a land detailed to the most-detailed are: physiographic province, classification system developed by the senior author (Smalley region, subregion, landtype association, and landtype.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Gap, Tennessee : Building Community Identity Along the Wilderness Road, 1880-1929
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1991 Cumberland Gap, Tennessee : Building community identity along the Wilderness Road, 1880-1929 Rebecca Vial University of Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Vial, Rebecca, "Cumberland Gap, Tennessee : Building community identity along the Wilderness Road, 1880-1929. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1991. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5827 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Rebecca Vial entitled "Cumberland Gap, Tennessee : Building community identity along the Wilderness Road, 1880-1929." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Susan D. Becker, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Rebecca Vial entitled "Cumberland Gap, Tennessee: Building Community Identity on the Wilderness Road, 1880-1929." I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Gap National Historical Park (PDF)
    A fact sheet from 2018 National Park Service Almost $1 million is needed to fix a leak in the visitor center’s roof. iStockphoto Cumberland Gap National Historical Park Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia Overview Cumberland Gap National Historical Park spans a prominent V-shaped notch in the Appalachian Mountains that is known as the first gateway to the West. Dr. Thomas Walker discovered the pass in 1750 while searching for a settlement beyond the mountains. Twenty-five years later, a group of investors looking to colonize the Kentucky region hired Daniel Boone and 30 men to create a trail later known as the Wilderness Road. Long used by Native Americans, the path became the main artery for 300,000 pioneers who migrated west over the next 50 years. The National Park Service (NPS) established the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park in 1940. The 24,000- acre park tracks the Cumberland Mountains along the borders of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia for 26 miles. Visitors can enjoy 85 miles of hiking trails, scenic views, and historical sites. Unfortunately, the park has almost $15 million in deferred maintenance. Maintenance challenges Cumberland Gap’s roads, trails, and historic sites all need repairs. The park needs almost $1 million to resurface the famed Wilderness Road so that visitors can better access campgrounds and picnic areas. The Wilderness Road Trail, which parallels its namesake road, needs more than $100,000 in repairs. Three-quarters of needed infrastructure repairs are for historic sites. Among them is the Hensley Settlement, an Appalachian living history museum that includes 12 log cabins, a one-room schoolhouse, and a blacksmith shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Gap Master Plan and Trailhead Development Plan
    Cumberland Gap Master Plan and Trailhead Development Plan Community Development Partners Cumberland Gap Master Plan and Trailhead Development Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Community Vision ............................................................................. 33 Executive Summary ............................................................................. 1 Steering Committee ........................................................................ 33 The Historic Town of Cumberland Gap .......................................... 2 Cumberland Gap Master Plan Survey ......................................... 33 Community Need................................................................................. 3 Public Meetings .............................................................................. 35 What is the Cumberland Gap Master Plan? ..................................... 5 Vision Statement ............................................................................ 36 How Will the Plan Be Used? .......................................................... 6 Mentor Communities ......................................................................... 37 Plan Consistency .............................................................................. 7 Banner Elk ....................................................................................... 37 Project Area ...................................................................................... 8 Damascus .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: an East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1969 A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East- West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee Dennis E. Quillen University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Quillen, Dennis E., "A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1969. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2782 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Dennis E. Quillen entitled "A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. Loyal Durand, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Robert G. Long, William N. Cherry Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Au gust 1, 1969 To the Graduate Council : I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Dennis E.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Evaluation of Forest Sites on the Northern Cumberland Plateau
    .,;;~~~\ United States IttAc.. !)) Department of Classification and Evaluation \:..~ Agriculture Forest Service of Forest Sites on the Southern Forest Northern Cumberland Plateau Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisianfl General rechnical Report SO-60 March 1986 Glendon W. Smalley SUMMARY This paper presents a comprehensive forest site classification system for the northern Cumberland Plateau in north central Tennessee and eastern Ken­ tucky. The system is based on physiography, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Twenty-four landtypes are described and evaluated in terms of productivity and desirability of selected pines and hardwoods for timber pro­ duction. Also, each landtype is rated for five soil-related problems that can affect forest management operations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my colleagues, past and present, for their scientific input, reviews, and stimulating discussions. I am also grateful to the soil scientist$, silviculturists, plant ecologists, and practicing foresters who have reviewed this guide. CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................... 1 Northern Cumberland Plateau Region............................. 1 Subregions and LandtypeAssociations ..... ..... ... .. .. ... .. ...... 11 Landtypes ....................................................... 15 Forest Management Interpretations ............................... 16 Using the System ................................................ 17 Landtype Descriptions and Forest Management Interpretations . 23 Literature Cited ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Ecoregions of Tennessee
    Summary Table: Characteristics of Ecoregions of Tennessee 65. SOUTHEASTERN PLAINS 68. SOUTHWESTERN APPALACHIANS Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Land Use and Land Cover Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Land Use and Land Cover Area Elevation / Surficial and bedrock Order (Great Groups) Common Soil Series Temperature / Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature Vegetation Area Elevation / Surficial and bedrock Order (Great Groups) Common Soil Series Temperature / Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature Vegetation (square Local Relief Moisture Regimes Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; (square Local Relief Moisture Regimes Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; miles) (feet) (inches) (days) July min/max, (F) miles) (feet) (inches) (days) July min/max, (F) 65a. Blackland 50 Irregular plains and undulating lowland; low 500-600 Quaternary dark gray clay or clay loam Ultisols (Hapludults), Oktibbeha, Silerton, Dulac, Thermic / Udic 52 210 29/50 Oak-hickory forest; Blackbelt Cropland and pasture, with small 68a. Cumberland 3184 Undulating and rolling tableland and some 1200-2000 Quaternary sandy decomposition Ultisols (Hapludults), Lily, Ramsey, Lonewood, Gilpin Mesic / Udic 48-60 180-200 24/44 Mixed oak forest on uplands; Mostly forested; timber and coal Prairie gradient streams with clay, sand, and silt / over Cretaceous-age chalk, marl, and Alfisols (Hapludalfs, Sumter forest of sweetgum, oak, cedar; patches of mixed hardwoods and Plateau open low mountains; somewhat weakly / residuum; Pennsylvanian conglomerate, Inceptisols (Dystrochrepts) mixed mesophytic forest mining activities; some cropland substrates. 50-100 calcareous clay. Paleudalfs), bottomland 68/91 patches of bluestem prairie. pine. dissected. 300-800 sandstone, siltstone, shale. 63/85 (maple, buckeye, beech, tulip and pasture; tourism; public Entisols (Fluvaquents, poplar, oak) in ravines and recreation and wildlife areas.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND CLASSIFICATION of the STANDING STONE STATE FOREST and State PARK on the EASTERN HIGHLAND RIM in TENNESSEE: the INTERACTION of GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, and SOILS
    LAND CLASSIFICATION OF THE STANDING STONE STATE FOREST AND State PARK ON THE EASTERN HIGHLAND RIM IN TENNESSEE: THE INTERACTION OF GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS Glendon W. Smalley, Carlie McCowan, S. David Todd, Phillip M. Morrissey, and J. Andrew McBride1 Abstract—This paper summarizes the application of a land classification system developed by the senior author to the Standing Stone State Forest and State Park (SSSF&SP) on the Eastern Highland Rim. Landtypes are the most detailed level in the hierarchical system and represent distinct units of the landscape (mapped at a scale of 1:24,000) as defined by climate, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. The area is highly dissected with local relief of about 1,000 feet. Mississippian and Ordovician strata are essentially level bedded; defining elevations were assigned. Suites of soils are common to the nine strata, and a group of landtypes was defined for each geologic strata/soils combination. Each of the 19 landtypes is described in terms of 9 elements. Additional information includes species suitability, site productivity, and operability for management activities. The maps aid the delineation of stands, streamside management zones, and “conservation” and other special use areas; the location of rare, threatened and endangered (RT&E) species; the design of harvests; and the modeling of future forest conditions. The landtypes are an integral element in modeling wildlife habitat, in siting game food plots, and planning other wildlife management activities. The maps are excellent training devices and extremely useful in explaining management plans to legislators and the public. INTRODUCTION 1979). Application of the system to other physiographic The Tennessee Division of Forestry (TDF) has adopted a land provinces represents an extension of the original concept classification system developed by the senior author (Smalley (Smalley 1991a).
    [Show full text]
  • Landslides in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountains of West Virginia J
    Landslides in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountains of West Virginia J. Steven Kite The area designated as the Cumberland Plateau and Mountains in southwestern West Virginia (Figure 1) is dominated by rugged topography, clastic sedimentary bedrock, and well-drained soils developed in colluvium, mining regolith, and residuum. Regolith (unconsolidated material) produced by mining is widely distributed and locally thick in the coal-bearing geologic settings that encompass over 90 percent of the area. A U.S. Geological Survey landslide overview map of the United States (Radbruch-Hall and others, 1978) shows high landslide incidence throughout the entire area. LiDAR-based mapping reveals the abundance of landslides in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountains is virtually the same as in the Southern Alleghenies, but over five times more abundant than in the Appalachian Ridges and Valleys. Figure 1: Map of Natural Resources Conservation Service Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs), Planning and Development Regions, and county boundaries in West Virginia, show on a shaded relief topographic base map. In the West Virginia Landslide Risk Assessment natural regions were subdivided by U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006) Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs), not by physiographic regions. West Virginia’s physiography is coarsely mapped compared to detailed physiographic maps in adjacent states, whereas MLRAs are more precisely delineated and better capture regional variations in topography, geology, and soils than the state’s established physiographic provinces and sections. The area covered in this report lies within U.S. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) MLRA 125: Cumberland Plateau and Mountains, which extends from central West Virginia to northern Alabama, including portions of southwest Virginia, eastern Kentucky, and middle Tennessee.
    [Show full text]