Tectonic Deformation Lamellae in Quartz
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Structure Characterization of Impact Natural Diamond from Popigai Crater
80th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 1987) 6191.pdf STRUCTURE CHARACTERIZATION OF IMPACT NATURAL DIAMOND FROM POPIGAI CRATER Mara Murri1, Adrian P. Jones2, Paul F. McMillan3, Christoph G. Salzmann3, Matteo Alvaro1, M. Chiara Domeneghetti1, Fabrizio Nestola4, Mauro Prencipe5, David Dobson2, Rachael Hazael3, Moreton Moore6, Sergei A. Vishnevsky7, Alla M. Logvinova7, Nikolay V. Sobolev7 1 Earth and Environmental Science University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 1, Italy ([email protected]), 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK ([email protected]), 3 Department of Chemistry, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK, 4 Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, Italy 5 Earth Sciences Department, University of Torino, Italy, 6 Royal Holloway, University of London, TW20 0EX, UK, 7 Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptyug Ave., 3, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia Introduction: Impact cratering is undoubtedly one of the most frequent high-energetic and potentially catastrophic event occurring at the earth surface and in the planetary system. For example, the energy released from an impact occurring on the Earth’s surface as calculated even for a small impact crater appears to be 3 orders of magnitudes higher than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. These enormous energies and the very short duration can cause unique irreversible changes to rocks and minerals (eg. deformations, phase transformations, melting and vaporization) and are compatible with P and T conditions required to transform graphite into diamond (4.5GPa at 1000°C) and are also enough to induce deformation in the newly formed diamonds. -
The Popigai Crater in the Capacity of Interplanetary Structural Analog
EPSC Abstracts Vol. 5, EPSC2010-217, 2010 European Planetary Science Congress 2010 c Author(s) 2010 The Popigai crater in the capacity of interplanetary structural analog. G.Dolnikov (1), O.Korablev (1), O.Roste (1) and N. Evdokimova (1) (1) Space Research Institute (IKI), Russia, ([email protected] / Fax: +7-495-3332566) Abstract Popigai crater was formed into two-layer target of Archaean crystalline rocks of the Anabar Shields, In central Arctic Siberia of Russia is situated one of and overlying Proterozoic to Mesozoic sedimentary interesting placing our planet crater Popigai. It is the sequences. Basement rocks are represented by the 4th largest impact crater on Earth but the best Verkhne-Anabar (lower layer up to 10 km thick) and exposed, the three other craters are larger, but they the Khapchan (about 800-1200 m) series [3]. are either buried (Chicxulub), strongly deformed (Sudbury), or deformed and severely eroded (Vredefort). The crater is filled with melted and shuttered material, including microdiamonds and other high pressure minerals characteristic of ultra- high pressure formed during the catastrophic impact. 1. Introduction One of very interesting astroblem of Earth is one hundred kilometres Popigai structure, centred at 7134'N, 11112'E in central Arctic Siberia (Fig. 1, 2), that has been ascribed as nature conservation Figure 2: Space image of Popigai meteorite crater. object of our planet of significant first value [1], [2]. Сlearly showed the inner part about 80 km with a darker tone of forest. In Western and North-Western 2. Popigai astroblem sectors of crater clearly showed exits fragments of bottom old crater and melt rocks (tagamites). -
Evidence from the Northwestern Venezuelan Andes for Extraterrestrial Impact: the Black Mat Enigma
Geomorphology 116 (2010) 48–57 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Evidence from the northwestern Venezuelan Andes for extraterrestrial impact: The black mat enigma W.C. Mahaney a,⁎, V. Kalm b, D.H. Krinsley c, P. Tricart d, S. Schwartz d, J. Dohm e,f, K.J. Kim g, B. Kapran a, M.W. Milner a, R. Beukens h, S. Boccia i, R.G.V. Hancock j, K.M. Hart k, B. Kelleher k a Quaternary Surveys, 26 Thornhill Ave., Thornhill, Ontario, Canada L4J 1J4 b Institute of Ecology & Earth Sciences, Tartu University, Tartu, EE51014, Estonia c Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1272, USA d Laboratoire de Geodynamique des Chaînes Alpines, University of Grenoble, Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers, 38041, Grenoble, France e Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Az., 85721, USA f The Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan g Geological Research Division (Prospective Geoscience Research Department), Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 92 Gwahang-no, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Republic of Korea h IsoTrace Lab, Dept of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A7 i Department of Materials Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E4 j Department of Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences and Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1 k School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Ballymun Road, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland article info abstract Article history: A carbon-rich black layer encrusted on a sandy pebbly bed of outwash in the northern Venezuelan Andes, Received 11 January 2009 previously considered the result of an alpine grass fire, is now recognized as a ‘black mat’ candidate correlative Received in revised form 9 October 2009 with Clovis Age sites in North America, falling within the range of ‘black mat’ dated sites (~12.9 ka cal BP). -
Shocked Quartz, Ir, Sr, and OS Anomalies Found in the Late
LPS XXVII 239 Shocked Quartz, Ir, Sr, and 0sanomalies found in the Late Eocene at Massignano (Ancona, Italy): clear evidence of a bolide impact. Aron K. Clymer, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; Hubert B. Vonhof, Research School of Sedimentary Geology (NSG), Inst. of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, 1018 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Thomas Meisel, Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; David M. Bice, Dept. of Geology, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057; Alessandm Montanari, Osservatorio Geologico di Coldigioco, 62020 Frontale (MC), Italy. Shock metamorphosed quartz grains coincident with a positive Ir anomaly of 199 +I- 19 ppb, a positive 87Srl86Sr anomaly, and a negative 187W 1880s anomaly of about 0.3 5 have been found in a marly layer of the Late Eocene Scagha Variegata formation at Massignano (Ancona), which clearly indicates a large impact with an interpolated radiometric age of 35.7 +I- 0.4 Ma. The Popigai crater (Siberia, - 100 km diameter) and the recently discovered Chesapeake Bay Crater (Eastern U. S., - 80 km diameter) are the only known giant craters from the Late Eocene and are prime candidates for the event that distributed the shocked quartz and geochemical anomalies found at Massignano. Although the Middle and Late Eocene are characterized by signrficant stepwise extinctions, the only evidence of a biotic response at Massignano to an impact is a cooler water shift in the dinocyst assemblage associated with the impact layer. Therefore the effects of the impact on this region of the Late Eocene Tethys appears mild, and the global ramification s of the Late Eocene impacts on climate and life remains unclear. -
The Chiemgau Crater Strewn Field: Evidence of a Holocene Large Impact Event in Southeast Bavaria, Germany
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259471241 The Chiemgau Crater Strewn Field: Evidence of a Holocene Large Impact Event in Southeast Bavaria, Germany Article · January 2010 CITATIONS READS 20 115 7 authors, including: Kord Ernstson Andreas Neumair University of Wuerzburg University of Salzburg 97 PUBLICATIONS 571 CITATIONS 33 PUBLICATIONS 102 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Barbara Rappenglueck Michael A. Rappenglück Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Gilching vhs Gilching and Observatory Gilching 16 PUBLICATIONS 72 CITATIONS 60 PUBLICATIONS 156 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The Digital Terrain Model (DTM) for the evaluation of Holocene meteorite craters. View project New approach to an old debate: The Pelarda Formation meteorite impact ejecta (Azuara structure, Iberian Chain, NE Spain) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Kord Ernstson on 28 December 2013. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies 1 (2010 3) 72-103 ~ ~ ~ УДК 551.3 The Chiemgau Crater Strewn Field: Evidence of a Holocene Large Impact Event in Southeast Bavaria, Germany Kord Ernstson*a, Werner Mayerb, Andreas Neumairb, Barbara Rappenglückb, Michael A. Rappenglückb, Dirk Sudhausc and Kurt W. Zellerd a University of Würzburg, Am Judengarten 23, 97204 Höchberg, Germany b Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, Bahnhofstraße 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany c Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 10, 86135 Augsburg, Germany d Österreichisches Forschungszentrum Dürrnberg, Pflegerplatz 5, 5400 Hallein, Austria 1 Received 30.01.2009, received in revised form 27.02.2010, accepted 9.03.2010 The Chiemgau strewn field in the Alpine Foreland discovered in the early new millennium comprises more than 80 mostly rimmed craters in a roughly elliptically shaped area with axes of about 60 km and 30 km. -
Candidates for Multiple Impact Craters: Popigai and Chicxulub As Seen by EGM08, a Global 50×50 Gravitational Model
Solid Earth Discuss., 2, 69–103, 2010 Solid Earth www.solid-earth-discuss.net/2/69/2010/ Discussions © Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in SE if available. Candidates for multiple impact craters: popigai and chicxulub as seen by EGM08, a global 50×50 gravitational model J. Klokocnˇ ´ık1, J. Kostelecky´ 2,3, I. Pesekˇ 3, P. Novak´ 2,4, C. A. Wagner5, and J. Sebera1,3 1Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic 2Research Institute for Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Czech Republic 3Department of Advanced Geodesy, Czech Technical University, Czech Republic 4Department of Math, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic 5Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry, NOAA, USA Received: 15 January 2010 – Accepted: 25 February 2010 – Published: 9 March 2010 Correspondence to: J. Klokocnˇ ´ık ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 69 Abstract In 2008 the new Earth Gravitational Model (EGM08) was released. It contains a com- plete set of spherical harmonic coefficients of the Earth’s gravitational potential (Stokes parameters) to degree 2190 and order 2159 that can be used for evaluation of various 5 potential quantities with both the unprecedented accuracy and high spatial resolution. Two such quantities, the gravity anomaly and second-order radial derivative of the dis- turbing potential, were computed over selected areas with known impact craters. The displays of these derivatives for two such sites clearly show not only the strong circular- like features known to be associated with them but also other symmetrical structures 10 which appear to make them multiple impact sites. -
The Recognition of Terrestrial Impact Structures
Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, Vol. 77, No. 4, 253–263, 2002 © Czech Geological Survey, ISSN 1210-3527 The recognition of terrestrial impact structures ANN M. THERRIAULT – RICHARD A. F. GRIEVE – MARK PILKINGTON Natural Resources Canada, Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, KIA 0ES Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Earth is the most endogenically active of the terrestrial planets and, thus, has retained the poorest sample of impacts that have occurred throughout geological time. The current known sample consists of approximately 160 impact structures or crater fields. Approximately 30% of known impact structures are buried and were initially detected as geophysical anomalies and subsequently drilled to provide geologic samples. The recognition of terrestrial impact structures may, or may not, come from the discovery of an anomalous quasi-circular topographic, geologic or geo- physical feature. In the geologically active terrestrial environment, anomalous quasi-circular features, however, do not automatically equate with an impact origin. Specific samples must be acquired and the occurrence of shock metamorphism, or, in the case of small craters, meteoritic fragments, must be demonstrated before an impact origin can be confirmed. Shock metamorphism is defined by a progressive destruction of the original rock and mineral structure with increasing shock pressure. Peak shock pressures and temperatures produced by an impact event may reach several hundreds of gigaPascals and several thousand degrees Kelvin, which are far outside the range of endogenic metamorphism. In addition, the application of shock- wave pressures is both sudden and brief. Shock metamorphic effects result from high strain rates, well above the rates of norma l tectonic processes. -
Appendix a Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable
Appendix A Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable, or Possible Distal Ejecta Layers A.1 Introduction In this appendix we discuss the methods that we have used to recover and study ejecta found in various types of sediment and rock. The processes used to recover ejecta material vary with the degree of lithification. We thus discuss sample processing for unconsolidated, semiconsolidated, and consolidated material separately. The type of sediment or rock is also important as, for example, carbonate sediment or rock is processed differently from siliciclastic sediment or rock. The methods used to take and process samples will also vary according to the objectives of the study and the background of the investigator. We summarize below the methods that we have found useful in our studies of distal impact ejecta layers for those who are just beginning such studies. One of the authors (BPG) was trained as a marine geologist and the other (BMS) as a hard rock geologist. Our approaches to processing and studying impact ejecta differ accordingly. The methods used to recover ejecta from unconsolidated sediments have been successfully employed by BPG for more than 40 years. A.2 Taking and Handling Samples A.2.1 Introduction The size, number, and type of samples will depend on the objective of the study and nature of the sediment/rock, but there a few guidelines that should be followed regardless of the objective or rock type. All outcrops, especially those near industrialized areas or transportation routes (e.g., highways, train tracks) need to be cleaned off (i.e., the surface layer removed) prior to sampling. -
A New Way to Confirm Meteorite Impact Produced Planar Features in Quartz: Combining Universal Stage and Electron Backscatter Diffraction Techniques
A new way to confirm meteorite impact produced planar features in quartz: combining Universal Stage and Electron Backscatter Diffraction techniques M.H. Voorn MSc Thesis August 2010 Utrecht University - Earth Sciences department Structural Geology and Tectonic research group Abstract As recognised from the geological record, meteorite impact events can have a severe influence on (local) geology, climate and life. Solid evidence for these events is therefore important to obtain. The most convincing evidence comes from microstructures in quartz. Upon impact, Planar Fractures (PFs) and Planar Deformation Features (PDFs) form parallel to specific crystallographic planes in quartz. Non-impact formed (tectonic) Deformation Lamellae (DL) may be hard to distinguish qualitatively from PFs or PDFs with the optical microscope, but do not form parallel to crystallographic planes. Quantitative methods using the Universal Stage (U-Stage) on the optical microscope have therefore been applied widely to (dis)confirm this parallelism. With the method, the quartz c-axis and poles to planar features are measured and plotted. An improved technique requires so-called indexing of the measured orientations using a stereographic projection template. Even when these techniques are applied, some proposed impact structures remain debated. An important reason for this is the U-stage can not provide the full crystal orientation of quartz. The goal of this thesis was to check the classical U-stage techniques for quantitatively confirming impact planar features in quartz, and to see whether the addition of Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD, on the Scanning Electron Microscope: SEM) and Cathodoluminescence (CL, on the SEM) can provide more solid evidence. Six previously confirmed impact and three non-impact samples were studied. -
Establishing the Link Between the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure and the North American Tektite Strewn Field: the Sr-Nd Isotopic Evidence
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 41, Nr 5, 689–703 (2006) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Establishing the link between the Chesapeake Bay impact structure and the North American tektite strewn field: The Sr-Nd isotopic evidence Alexander DEUTSCH1, 2* and Christian KOEBERL3 1Institut f¸r Planetologie (IfP), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU), Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 10, D-48149 M¸nster, Germany 2Zentrallabor f¸r Geochronologie (ZLG), WWU, Corrensstr. 24, D-48149 M¸nster, Germany 3Department of Geological Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 09 November 2004; revision accepted 21 December 2005) Abstract–The Chesapeake Bay impact structure, which is about 35 Ma old, has previously been proposed as the possible source crater of the North American tektites (NAT). Here we report major and trace element data as well as the first Sr-Nd isotope data for drill core and outcrop samples of target lithologies, crater fill breccias, and post-impact sediments of the Chesapeake Bay impact ε t = 35.7 Ma structure. The unconsolidated sediments, Cretaceous to middle Eocene in age, have Sr of + + ε t = 35.7 Ma − − 54 to 272, and Nd ranging from 6.5 to 10.8; one sample from the granitic basement Nd ε t = 35.7 Ma + ε t = 35.7 Ma − with a T CHUR model age of 1.36 Ga yielded an Sr of 188 and an Nd of 5.7. The Exmore breccia (crater fill) can be explained as a mix of the measured target sediments and the granite, plus an as-yet undetermined component. -
Eocene/Oligocene Boundary)
Open Journal of Geology, 2018, 8, 9-32 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 How to Trace out Impact-Triggered Effects Globally Scattered around Formation Boundaries: Case Uhry, North Germany (Eocene/Oligocene Boundary) Werner Schneider1, Elias Salameh2 1Emeritus: University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany 2University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan How to cite this paper: Schneider, W. and Abstract Salameh, E. (2018) How to Trace out Im- pact-Triggered Effects Globally Scattered By focusing on impact-triggered phenomena having occurred synchronously around Formation Boundaries: Case Uhry, with or shortly prior to formation boundaries, two glass sand pits (Upper North Germany (Eocene/Oligocene Boun- Maastrichtian) located near Uhry, North Germany have been studied in re- dary). Open Journal of Geology, 8, 9-32. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.81002 gard to the K/T boundary throughout the last 40 years during progressive ex- ploitation of glass sand. However, a clastic sequence of sand, mass flow and Received: November 16, 2017 pelite deposited in a deep channel of about 10 - 12 m in depth, eroded into the Accepted: January 12, 2018 glass sand, surprisingly shows an Upper Eocene/Lower Oligocene age, well Published: January 15, 2018 defined by a Dinocyst assemblage (Chiripteridium c. galea, Enneado cysta ar- Copyright © 2018 by authors and cuata, Areoligera tauloma = D 12na - D 14na) from a 0.5 meter thick pelite Scientific Research Publishing Inc. that marks the Rupelian transgression within an estuarian system running This work is licensed under the Creative northwest/southeastward. The section exposes a high energy mass flow and Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). -
Designing Global Climate and Atmospheric Chemistry Simulations for 1 and 10 Km Diameter Asteroid Impacts Using the Properties of Ejecta from the K-Pg Impact
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13185–13212, 2016 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/13185/2016/ doi:10.5194/acp-16-13185-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Designing global climate and atmospheric chemistry simulations for 1 and 10 km diameter asteroid impacts using the properties of ejecta from the K-Pg impact Owen B. Toon1, Charles Bardeen2, and Rolando Garcia2 1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 2National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA Correspondence to: Owen B. Toon ([email protected]) Received: 15 April 2016 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 17 May 2016 Revised: 28 August 2016 – Accepted: 29 September 2016 – Published: 27 October 2016 Abstract. About 66 million years ago, an asteroid about surface. Nanometer-sized iron particles are also present glob- 10 km in diameter struck the Yucatan Peninsula creating the ally. Theory suggests these particles might be remnants of the Chicxulub crater. The crater has been dated and found to be vaporized asteroid and target that initially remained as va- coincident with the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K-Pg) mass ex- por rather than condensing on the hundred-micron spherules tinction event, one of six great mass extinctions in the last when they entered the atmosphere. If present in the great- 600 million years. This event precipitated one of the largest est abundance allowed by theory, their optical depth would episodes of rapid climate change in Earth’s history, yet no have exceeded 1000. Clastics may be present globally, but modern three-dimensional climate calculations have simu- only the quartz fraction can be quantified since shock fea- lated the event.