FREE THE EYE IN THE TRIANGLE: AN INTERPRETATION OF PDF

Israel Regardie,Robert Anton Wilson | 554 pages | 20 Mar 2014 | New Falcon Publications,U.S. | 9781561840540 | English | Tempe, AZ, United States Morten Tolboll: Aleister Crowley – The Eye in the Triangle

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. Instead Regardie focus on understanding Crowley using his memories of him, his writing and actions, and looking through the lens of the psychoanalytic world view of Wilhelm Reich Regardie made a living as a Reichian therapist and chiropractor. Regardie is very open with the reader about his naivety when first coming into contact with Crowley and the nature of their later falling out; and it's a joy to 'listen' as the old man share scenes from his time with Crowley. Regardie gives his valuable insights into Crowley's psyche to us. Besides assuming the reader already knows the major events of Crowley's life, it also assumes a basic knowledge in the western esoteric tradition. So to sum up: a great book to get to know who Aleister Crowley was, but it's not for the casual reader, and it's not suitable as the first biography. Word een LibraryThing Auteur. Start Groepen Discussie Meer Tijdgeest. Ik ga akkoord Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en indien je niet ingelogd bent voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden. Reeks en : Biographies of Aleister Crowley. Leden Besprekingen Populariteit Gemiddelde beoordeling Aanhalingen 2 82, 3. It is an intelligent and insightful look into Crowley's life, magick and The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley. Regardie interprets all The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley from the wisdom of experience. It was Regardie's main ambition to preserve and perpetuate the teachings and work of Aleister Crowley and the Golden Dawn. LeinhartcnsDesSorcieres. Bezig met laden who knew Crowley does not, as so many biographers, fall into the two convenient categories, when it comes to categorizing the man: the degenerate 'Black Magus' or misunderstood 'Prophet'. Regardie comes across a bit pompous, but this book gave me better insights into Crowley's character than anything else I've read. Voorwoord Secondaire auteur sommige edities bevestigd Wilson, Robert Anton Introductie Secondaire auteur sommige edities bevestigd. Onderdeel van de reeks en Biographies of Aleister Crowley. Je The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken. Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen. Aleister Crowley. Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen. Wikipedia in het Engels Geen. This book is the classic Crowley biography. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. Haiku samenvatting. Voeg toe aan jouw boeken. Voeg toe aan je verlanglijst. Snelkoppelingen Amazon. Amazon Kindle 0 edities. Audible 0 edities. CD Audiobook 0 edities. Google Books — Bezig met laden Boeken zoeken in uw omgeving. Ruilen 10 gevraagd. Populaire omslagen. Waardering Gemiddelde : 3. Ben jij dit? Over Contact LibraryThing. Reeks en : Biographies of Aleister Crowley Leden. Onlangs toegevoegd door. Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis. Gangbare titel. Oorspronkelijke titel. Alternatieve titels. Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave. Belangrijke plaatsen. Belangrijke gebeurtenissen. Verwante films. Prijzen en onderscheidingen. Eerste woorden. Laatste woorden. Uitgevers redacteuren. Oorspronkelijke taal. Voeg toe aan jouw boeken Voeg toe aan je verlanglijst Snelkoppelingen. The Eye in the Triangle

Aiwass is the name given to a voice that English occultist Aleister Crowley reported to have heard on April 8, 9, and 10 in Crowley reported that this voice, which he considered originated with a non-corporeal intelligence, dictated The Book of the Law or Liber Legis to him. His first and only identification as such is in Chapter I: "Behold! Hoor-paar-kraat Egyptian: Har-pa-khered is more commonly referred to by the Greek transliteration Harpocratesmeaning "Horus the Child", whom Crowley considered to be the central deity within the Thelemic cosmology see: Aeon of Horus. The Voice of Aiwass came apparently from over my left shoulder, from the furthest corner of the room. It seemed to echo itself in my physical heart in a very strange manner, hard to describe. I have noticed a similar phenomenon when I have been waiting for a message fraught with great hope or dread. The voice was passionately poured, as if Aiwass were alert about the time-limit The voice was of deep timbre, musical and expressive, its tones solemn, voluptuous, tender, fierce or aught else as suited the moods of the message. The English was free of either native or foreign accent, perfectly pure of local or caste mannerisms, thus startling and even uncanny at first hearing. I had a strong impression that the speaker was actually in the corner where he seemed to be, in a body of "fine matter," transparent as a veil of gauze, or a cloud of incense-smoke. He seemed to be a tall, dark man in his thirties, well-knit, active and strong, with the face of a savage king, and eyes veiled lest their gaze should destroy what they saw. The dress was not Arab; it suggested Assyria or Persia, but very vaguely. I took little note of it, for to me at that time Aiwass was an "angel" such as I had often seen in visions, a being purely astral. In the later-written Liberthe voice of the 8th Aethyr says "my name is called Aiwass," and "in The Book of the Law did I write the secrets of truth that are like unto a star and a snake and a sword. Crowley went to great pains to argue that Aiwass was an objectively separate being from himself, possessing far more knowledge than he or any other human could possibly have. He wrote "no forger could have prepared so complex a set of numerical and literal puzzles". The existence of true religion presupposes that of some discarnate intelligence, whether we call him God or anything else. And this The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley exactly what no religion had ever proved scientifically. And this is what The Book of the Law does prove by internal evidence, altogether independent of any statement of mine. This proof is evidently the most important step in science that could possibly be made: for it opens up an entirely new avenue to knowledge. The immense superiority of this particular intelligence, AIWASS, to any other with which mankind has yet been in conscious communication is shown not merely by the character of the book itself, but by the fact of his comprehending perfectly the nature of the proof necessary to demonstrate the fact of his own existence and the conditions of that existence. And, further, having provided the proof required. However, Crowley also spoke of Aiwass in symbolic terms. In The Law Is for All[7] he goes on at length in comparison to various other deities and spiritual concepts, but most especially to The Fool. For example, he writes of Aiwass: "In his absolute innocence and ignorance he is The Fool; he is the Saviour, being the Son who shall trample on the crocodiles and tigers, and avenge his father Osiris. Thus we see him as the Great Fool of Celtic legend, the Pure Fool of Act I of Parsifaland, generally speaking, the insane person whose words have always been taken for oracles. Perhaps more importantly, Crowley later identified Aiwass as his own personal and more. Yet even while eventually identifying Aiwass as his Holy Guardian Angel, Crowley still went to even greater lengths in his later years to insist that Aiwass was an objective entity apart from himself, even going as far as to declare in no uncertain terms The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley the Holy Guardian Angel is not only entirely objective, but is also not to be confused with the "Higher Self," as in his final work, Magick Without Tears : "The Holy Guardian Angel is not the 'Higher Self' but an Objective individual. He is not, let me say with emphasis, a mere abstraction from yourself; and that is why I have insisted rather heavily that the term 'Higher Self' implies 'a damnable heresy and a dangerous delusion'. A number of The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley have expressed the view that Aiwass was most likely an unconscious manifestation of Crowley's personality. Occultist Israel Regardie argued for this view in his Crowley biography, The Eye in the Triangleand considered that The Book of the Law was a "colossal wish fulfillment" on Crowley's part. My 'conscience' is really an obstacle and a delusion, being a survival of heredity and education. The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley The Book of the Law the wish is fulfilled. Cammell, author of Aleister Crowley: The Man, the Mage, the Poet [12] also wrote that The Book of the Law was "in part but in part only an emanation from Crowley's The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley mind I can believe; for it bears a likeness to his own Daemonic personality. Ah, you realize that magick is something we do to ourselves. But it is more convenient to assume the objective existence of an angel who gives us new knowledge than to allege that our invocation has awakened a supernormal power in ourselves. Kaczynski, [13]. A number of authors such as Israel Regardie, [11] Sarah Veale, The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley and academic Joshua Gunn [14] have argued that the stylistic similarities between The Book of the Law and Crowley's other writings are evidence that Crowley rather than a discarnate entity was the sole source of the book. Occultist Michael Aquino of the Temple of Set also believed on esoteric grounds that Aiwass was probably "a subjective The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley of Crowley's own personality". Aquino does not believe in the objective existence of Hoor-pa-kraat, hence he considers the objective authenticity of Aiwass "doubtful" although he did consider The Book an "inspired utterance". Crowley, being the Qabalist that he was, labored to discover Aiwass's number within the system of gematria. Jacobs whose Golden Eagle Press published the work of e. To Crowley's astonishment and delight, it was OIVZ, which equated to 93the number of itself, and "also that of the Lost Word of freemasonrywhich I had re-discovered". However, when Crowley decided to use the Greek Qabalah, he discovered that. It represents the practice of the Book as 93 does the theory. He is not content to give one spelling of his name, however potent; he gives two which taken together are not merely twice as significant as either alone, but more so, in a degree which is beyond me to calculate. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Thelema Category:Thelema. True Will Nuit Hadit Horus. Babalon Chaos. Baphomet Choronzon. Aiwass Ma'at. The Book of the Law. Red Wheel Weiser Centennial edition,p. The Equinox. Retrieved 18 November The Equinox of the Gods. Magick Without Tears. Thelema Publications. The Book of the Law". New Falcon Publications. Archived from the original on Retrieved Modern rhetoric: mass media and the drama of secrecy in the twentieth century. University of Alabama Press. Archived from the original PDF on The Confessions of Aleister Crowley. A Garden of Pomegranates. Categories : Thelema Channelled entities New religious movement deities. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley by Israel Regardie

It is evident then that some of its members were prominent and intelligent people -not the usual occult nit-wits some critics have been prone to suspect. Yet, some book stores handle the Satanic Bible, while refusing to handle Crowley. For example, in one of his later books, he has elaborated considerably the essential viewpoint of the counsel he once gave me. We merely drifted apart following this debacle in Now I had both the passport and the visa-and everything was in order for the trip abroad to come face to face with Destiny. While his courage and fearlessness were second to none, I still recall on one occasion when I awakened him regarie an after-lunch nap to answer the telephone. It was resolved ultimately in a series of spiritual events which are the high-water marks of his life. Crowley tackled this problem with his usual heroic and fool-hardy Total Commitment. When he got back to London, he marched triumphantly into the Cafe Royal with the metal butterfly serving as a cod-piece over evening dress. It subsequently left a deep impression upon my mind, and it has continued to influence trkangle life in ways invaluable to my growth as both a man and a magician. Then tardily the expected letter from Crowley arrived. Or, the mystic who could write tenderly regarrie The Book of Lapis Lazuli: A man, infinitely flexible, but resolute— determined to resist to the bitter end and to fight to the death what he considered to be the foul symptoms of a dying and decadent culture. Yeats Twentieth Century Magus: Its foundation was designed to include both men and women on a basis of perfect equality, in contradistinction to the traditional Masonic policy of the Rosicrucian Society. But, being a gentleman, he could not be a real revivalist, which means manipulating the hysteria of mob psychology. But there were innumerable exceptions. An additional armament for the occultist is a psychotherapeutic technique which can aid in this goal without having to buy the metaphysics of its underpinnings. Blessed be the name of the Regxrdie. He never forgave me for this insult. The term Crowleyanity was an invention of the late General J. A metal butterfly had to be affixed to the offending part, thus rendering Oscar Wilde pure and noble. As a matter of practical politics, Crowley became ill forthwith so that he was enabled to stay on The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley Paris to find out what really was involved, while de Miramar and 1 were promptly expelled. When the Surete Generale matter finally came to a head six months after my leaving the United Griangle, brought to a boiling climax by complaints from a public relations man whom Crowley had dismissed, all hell broke loose. Magick and occultism strive to alter — undo — and loosen the restrictions of our unwilled SETS so that The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley can open higher circuits. We were both relieved to find out that we shared this anxiety. When it came time to obtain the French visa, I typed a The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley as though from my father and appended his signature. Very quickly and easily, Crowley helped me to get my luggage together. Also, on rare occasions, Regardie writes things like: This hostility altogether invalidates his attempt reyardie biography. Diagnosis can be too slick, too easy. I am passed, I am passed Out of the sensible world at last. Analysis and argument cannot convince, The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley may inhibit the reaction, which is above emotion and reason. But it always startled him, so vast was his naivete, when people did not always realize that they were pranks. If it happened that he Kenneth MacKenzie was telling the truth, it is not impossible that this multifarious person, who is known to have talked once at least with Eliphas Levi and to have left behind him some serious Enochian documents, may have produced the G. When this has been done, he should abandon them if they are really harmful in relation to health or comfort. May it not be that— near as the resounding roar of the viewless spectators sounds to our dust-dimmed ears— there stands some awful opposer in the way, some fear or some seduction? Regardie not only writes about mystical consciousness with unparalleled precision, but he has even succeeded in explain- ing the unique life and works of Aleister Crowley — the most difficult, perverse, enigmatic and generally egregious individual in the whole history of occultism. In this book, Regardie manages to write a fair and balanced view of Crowley. But in pleading for Yeats, she has shown a prejudice towards and lack of discrimination about Crowley. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. The Eye in the Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley cookies do not store any personal information. September 3, admin 0 Comment. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Privacy Overview. Necessary Always Enabled.