DOCSLIB.ORG

Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization 1004401.0003.05 Draft Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization December 2016 Prepared by: Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT This document was developed in support of the Surface Water Improvement and Management Program with funding assistance from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. ii Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT Version History Location(s) in Date Version Summary of Revision(s) Document 6/29/2016 1 All Initial draft Watershed Characterization (Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6) submitted to NWFWMD. 7/29/2016 2 Throughout Numerous edits and comments from District staff 11/21/2016 3 Throughout Numerous revisions to address District comments. 11/28/2016 4 Throughout Numerous edits and comments from District staff 12/8/2016 5 Throughout Numerous revisions to address District comments. L:\Publications\4200-4499\4401-0001_NWFWD iii Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT This page intentionally left blank. iv Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 1.1 SWIM Program Background, Goals, and Objectives...........................................1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of 2017 SWIM Plan ..............................................................2 2.0 Watershed Description ................................................................................................5 2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................5 2.2 Geographic Characteristics...................................................................................6 2.2.1 Geography ................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Land Use and Population .......................................................................10 2.3 Physical Setting ..................................................................................................14 2.3.1 Physiographic Region ............................................................................14 2.3.2 Ecoregions ..............................................................................................14 2.3.3 Climate ...................................................................................................19 2.3.4 Geology ..................................................................................................20 2.3.5 Soils ........................................................................................................20 2.4 Hydrologic Characteristics .................................................................................23 2.4.1 Major Rivers, Tributaries, and Coastal Waterbodies .............................23 2.4.2 Coastal Waterbodies ...............................................................................26 2.4.3 Lakes ......................................................................................................26 2.4.4 Springs ....................................................................................................28 2.4.5 Groundwater Systems ............................................................................30 2.5 Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................30 2.5.1 Hydrologic Functions .............................................................................31 2.5.2 Nutrient Cycling .....................................................................................31 2.5.3 Sediment Stabilization ............................................................................31 2.5.4 Commercially and Recreationally Important Fish and Wildlife ............33 2.5.5 Recreation and Aesthetic Value .............................................................35 2.6 Ecological Resources .........................................................................................36 2.6.1 Seagrass Beds .........................................................................................37 2.6.2 Palustrine, Riparian, and Floodplain Habitats ........................................39 2.6.3 Emergent Marsh .....................................................................................39 2.6.4 Steepheads ..............................................................................................40 2.6.5 Terrestrial Communities .........................................................................40 2.6.6 Migratory Bird Flyways .........................................................................41 3.0 Current Watershed Conditions and Water Resource Issues .................................43 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................43 viii Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 3.2 Water Quality .....................................................................................................43 3.2.1 Impaired Waters .....................................................................................43 3.2.2 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) .................................................46 3.2.3 Point Source Pollution ............................................................................48 3.2.4 Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution ..........................................................55 3.2.5 Ecological Indicators of Water Quality ..................................................64 3.3 Habitat Quality in Receiving Waters .................................................................67 3.3.1 Subtidal Communities ............................................................................67 3.3.2 Intertidal Communities ...........................................................................68 3.3.3 Freshwater Systems ................................................................................68 3.4 Floodplains .........................................................................................................70 3.4.1 Flood Prone Areas ..................................................................................71 3.4.2 Recent Flood Events ...............................................................................71 3.4.3 Floodplain Management .........................................................................72 3.5 Unique Features and Special Resource Management Designations ..................72 3.5.1 Conservation Lands ................................................................................72 3.5.2 Critical Habitat and Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas (SHCAs) .................................................................................................75 3.5.3 Aquatic Preserves ...................................................................................76 3.5.4 Outstanding Florida Waters (OFWs) .....................................................76 3.5.5 Gulf Ecological Management Sites (GEMS) .........................................78 4.0 Implementation and Achievements of the Previous SWIM Plan ..........................79 4.1 Previous SWIM Plan Issues and Priorities .........................................................79 4.2 Progress toward Meeting Plan Goals and Objectives ........................................81 5.0 Related Resource Management Activities ...............................................................84 5.1 Deepwater Horizon: RESTORE Act, Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA), and NFWF Projects ........................................................84 5.1.1 RESTORE ..............................................................................................84 5.1.2 Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) ...................................85 5.1.3 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) ...................................85 5.1.4 The Nature Conservancy (TNC): Watershed Management Planning ..................................................................................................86 5.2 Water Quality Monitoring ..................................................................................87 5.2.1 FDEP/NWFWMD ..................................................................................87 5.2.2 FDEP Northwest District .......................................................................88 5.2.3 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) ................................................................................................88 ix Ochlockonee River and Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 5.2.4 Florida Department of Health (FDOH) ..................................................88 5.2.5 LakeWatch .............................................................................................89 5.3 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring ...........................................89 5.4 Water Quality Restoration and Protection..........................................................89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterization of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Family
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Characterization of the G protein‑coupled receptor family SREB across fsh evolution Timothy S. Breton1*, William G. B. Sampson1, Benjamin Cliford2, Anyssa M. Phaneuf1, Ilze Smidt3, Tamera True1, Andrew R. Wilcox1, Taylor Lipscomb4,5, Casey Murray4 & Matthew A. DiMaggio4 The SREB (Super‑conserved Receptors Expressed in Brain) family of G protein‑coupled receptors is highly conserved across vertebrates and consists of three members: SREB1 (orphan receptor GPR27), SREB2 (GPR85), and SREB3 (GPR173). Ligands for these receptors are largely unknown or only recently identifed, and functions for all three are still beginning to be understood, including roles in glucose homeostasis, neurogenesis, and hypothalamic control of reproduction. In addition to the brain, all three are expressed in gonads, but relatively few studies have focused on this, especially in non‑mammalian models or in an integrated approach across the entire receptor family. The purpose of this study was to more fully characterize sreb genes in fsh, using comparative genomics and gonadal expression analyses in fve diverse ray‑fnned (Actinopterygii) species across evolution. Several unique characteristics were identifed in fsh, including: (1) a novel, fourth euteleost‑specifc gene (sreb3b or gpr173b) that likely emerged from a copy of sreb3 in a separate event after the teleost whole genome duplication, (2) sreb3a gene loss in Order Cyprinodontiformes, and (3) expression diferences between a gar species and teleosts. Overall, gonadal patterns suggested an important role for all sreb genes in teleost testicular development, while gar were characterized by greater ovarian expression that may refect similar roles to mammals. The novel sreb3b gene was also characterized by several unique features, including divergent but highly conserved amino acid positions, and elevated brain expression in pufer (Dichotomyctere nigroviridis) that more closely matched sreb2, not sreb3a.
    [Show full text]
  • Burned to Be Wild: Science, Society, and Ecological Conservation In
    BURNED TO BE WILD: SCIENCE, SOCIETY, AND ECOLOGICAL CONSERVATION IN THE SOUTHERN LONGLEAF PINE by ALBERT GLOVER WAY (Under the Direction of Paul S. Sutter) ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the development of ecological conservation and science in the southern coastal plain’s dominant ecosystem – the longleaf pine-grassland forest. It examines how the impetus for conservation changed over the long twentieth-century from concerns over bodily health, landscape aesthetics, and recreation, into concerns for ecological integrity and landscape diversity, and argues that the biocentric turn in twentieth-century science and society was rooted in the very processes of production that it sought to moderate. To unearth this story, it focuses on the region surrounding Thomasville, Georgia and Tallahassee, Florida, known as the Red Hills, where wealthy northerners came after the Civil War and Reconstruction in search of health, and remained to convert failing farms and plantations into winter retreats and hunting preserves. In the years covered here, roughly 1880-1960, this land of wealth and poverty was a working landscape that produced a variety of goods and supported a large number of people; yet, at the same time it was a conservation landscape and laboratory where a great deal of scientific knowledge about the longleaf pine-grassland environment came to light. The central figure in this dissertation is Herbert L. Stoddard, an ornithologist, wildlife biologist, and ecological forester who came to the Red Hills in 1924 as an agent of the U.S. Bureau of the Biological Survey to examine the life history and preferred habitat of the bobwhite quail.
    [Show full text]
  • Gar (Lepisosteidae)
    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Gar (Lepisosteidae) Gar species found in Indiana waters: -Longnose Gar (Lepisosteus osseus) -Shortnose Gar (Lepisosteus platostomus) -Spotted Gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) -Alligator Gar* (Atractosteus spatula) *Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Alligator gar were extirpated in many states due to habitat destruction, but now they have been reintroduced to their old native habitat in the states of Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Because they have been stocked into the Ohio River, there is a possibility that alligator gar are either already in Indiana or will be found here in the future. Alligator gar are one of the largest freshwater fishes of North America and can reach up to 10 feet long and weigh 300 pounds. Alligator gar are passive, solitary fishes that live in large rivers, swamps, bayous, and lakes. They have a short, wide snout and a double row of teeth on the upper jaw. They are ambush predators that eat mainly fish but have also been seen to eat waterfowl. They are not, however, harmful to humans, as they will only attack an animal that they can swallow whole. Photo Credit: Duane Raver, USFWS Other Names -garpike, billy gar -Shortnose gar: shortbill gar, stubnose gar -Longnose gar: needlenose gar, billfish Why are they called gar? The Anglo-Saxon word gar means spear, which describes the fishes’ long spear-like appearance. The genus name Lepisosteus contains the Greek words lepis which means “scale” and osteon which means “bone.” What do they look like? Gar are slender, cylindrical fishes with hard, diamond-shaped and non-overlapping scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosewood Avalon Jefferson County, Florida
    ROSEWOOD AVALON JEFFERSON COUNTY, FLORIDA $14,500,000 | 3,660± ACRES LISTING AGENT: ELLIOTT DAVENPORT, JR. THE WINGS GROUP, LLC 1428 WILLIAM ST., SUITE C-2 CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37408 M: 423.364.2092 [email protected] ROSEWOOD AVALON JEFFERSON COUNTY, FLORIDA $14,500,000 | 3,660± ACRES LISTING AGENT: ELLIOTT DAVENPORT, JR. THE WINGS GROUP, LLC 1428 WILLIAM ST., SUITE C-2 CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37408 M: 423.364.2092 [email protected] Land… that’s where it all begins. Whether it is ranch land or family retreats, working cattle ranches, plantations, farms, estancias, timber or recreational ranches for sale, it all starts with the land. Since 1946, Hall and Hall has specialized in serving the owners and prospective owners of quality rural real estate by providing mortgage loans, appraisals, land management, auction and brokerage services within a unique, integrated partnership structure. Our business began by cultivating long-term relationships built upon personal service and expert counsel. We have continued to grow today by being client-focused and results-oriented—because while it all starts with the land, we know it ends with you. WITH OFFICES IN: DENVER, COLORADO BOZEMAN, MONTANA EATON, COLORADO MISSOULA, MONTANA STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COLORADO VALENTINE, NEBRASKA SUN VALLEY, IDAHO COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS TETON VALLEY, IDAHO LAREDO, TEXAS HUTCHINSON, KANSAS LUBBOCK, TEXAS BUFFALO, WYOMING MELISSA, TEXAS BILLINGS, MONTANA SOUTHEASTERN US SALES | AUCTIONS | FINANCE | APPRAISALS | MANAGEMENT © 2020 HALL AND HALL | WWW.HALLANDHALL.COM | [email protected] — 2 — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rosewood Avalon is a beautiful Red Hills quail plantation consisting of 3,660± acres in Jefferson County, Florida, and in a neighborhood of other high-quality plantations such as Turkey Scratch, Oak Hill, El Destino, and Pinewoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Lepisosteidae (Gars)
    Invasive Species Fact Sheet Gar, Family Lepisosteidae General Description Gars are large, freshwater fish belonging to the Lepisosteidae family, which consists of 7 species of gar: alligator, Cuban, Florida, longnose, shortnose, spotted, and tropical. Gars have long, cylindrical bodies covered in hard, shiny, diamond-shaped Alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) scales. Their dorsal and anal fins sit far back on the body, Photo by South Carolina Department of Natural Resources near the tail. They have slender snouts with sharp, needle- like teeth. Gars are generally green to brown in color on their top and sides and white to yellow on their bellies; some species have spots on their bodies and/or fins. The different species of gar can be distinguished by snout length, number of rows of teeth, and the amount and location of spots. Depending on the species, adult gar range from 1 to over 9 feet long. The largest species of gar, the alligator gar, has been reported to grow up to 10 feet and weigh 350 lbs. Current Distribution Gars are not currently found in California. Alligator gars have been collected in California waters on a few occasions, but these fish were likely the result of aquarium releases. Five of the seven gar species are native to the United States. Spotted gars (Lepisosteus oculatus) confiscated Gars are currently found within and outside of their native ranges in by CDFW wardens the United States from the Great Lakes basin in the north, south Photo by CDFW through the Mississippi River drainage to Texas, Mexico, and Florida. Florida gars are only found in Florida and Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Structure of the Gas Bladder of Alligator Gar, Atractosteus Spatula Ahmad Omar-Ali1, Wes Baumgartner2, Peter J
    www.symbiosisonline.org Symbiosis www.symbiosisonlinepublishing.com International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology Research Article Open Access Fine Structure of the Gas Bladder of Alligator Gar, Atractosteus spatula Ahmad Omar-Ali1, Wes Baumgartner2, Peter J. Allen3, Lora Petrie-Hanson1* 1Department of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA 2Department of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA 3Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA Received: 1 November, 2016; Accepted: 2 December, 2016 ; Published: 12 December, 2016 *Corresponding author: Lora Petrie-Hanson, Associate Professor, College of Veterinary Medicine, 240 Wise Center Drive PO Box 6100, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA, Tel: +1-(601)-325-1291; Fax: +1-(662)325-1031; E-mail: [email protected] Lepisosteidae includes the genera Atractosteus and Lepisosteus. Abstract Atractosteus includes A. spatula (alligator gar), A. tristoechus Anthropogenic factors seriously affect water quality and (Cuban gar), and A. tropicus (tropical gar), while Lepisosteus includes L. oculatus (spotted gar), L. osseus (long nose gar), L. in the Mississippi River and the coastal estuaries. Alligator gar platostomus (short nose gar), and L. platyrhincus (Florida gar) (adversely affect fish )populations. inhabits these Agricultural waters andrun-off is impactedaccumulates by Atractosteus spatula [2,6,7]. Atractosteus are distinguishable from Lepisosteus by agricultural pollution, petrochemical contaminants and oil spills. shorter, more numerous gill rakers and a more prominent accessory organ. The gas bladder, or Air Breathing Organ (ABO) of second row of teeth in the upper jaw [2].
    [Show full text]
  • THROWTRAP FISH ID GUIDE.V5 Loftusedits
    Fish Identification Guide For Throw trap Samples Florida International University Aquatic Ecology Lab April 2007 Prepared by Tish Robertson, Brooke Sargeant, and Raúl Urgellés Table of Contents Basic fish morphology diagrams………………………………………..3 Fish species by family…………………………………………………...4-31 Gar…..………………………………………………………….... 4 Bowfin………….………………………………..………………...4 Tarpon…...……………………………………………………….. 5 American Eel…………………..………………………………….5 Bay Anchovy…..……..…………………………………………...6 Pickerels...………………………………………………………...6-7 Shiners and Minnows…………………………...……………….7-9 Bullhead Catfishes……..………………………………………...9-10 Madtom Catfish…………………………………………………..10 Airbreathing Catfish …………………………………………….11 Brown Hoplo…...………………………………………………….11 Orinoco Sailfin Catfish……………………………..……………12 Pirate Perch…….………………………………………………...12 Topminnows ……………….……………………….……………13-16 Livebearers……………….……………………………….…….. 17-18 Pupfishes…………………………………………………………19-20 Silversides..………………………………………………..……..20-21 Snook……………………………………………………………...21 Sunfishes and Basses……………….……………………....….22-25 Swamp Darter…………………………………………………….26 Mojarra……...…………………………………………………….26 Everglades pygmy sunfish……………………………………...27 Cichlids………………………….….………………………….....28-30 American Soles…………………………………………………..31 Key to juvenile sunfish..………………………………………………...32 Key to cichlids………....………………………………………………...33-38 Note for Reader/References…………………………………………...39 2 Basic Fish Morphology Diagrams Figures from Page and Burr (1991). 3 FAMILY: Lepisosteidae (gars) SPECIES: Lepisosteus platyrhincus COMMON NAME: Florida gar ENP CODE: 17 GENUS-SPECIES
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM City Or Town Tallahassee State ___FLORIDA
    NPS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property_____________________________ ____ historic name KILLEARN PLANTATION ARCHEOLQGICAL AND HISTORIC DISTRICT__________________ other names/site number Alfred B. Maclay State Gardens/Overstreet Addition_________________________ 2. Location street & number 3540 Thomasville Road N/A D not for publication city or town Tallahassee N/A D vicinity f state ____FLORIDA code FL county Leon _code 073 zip code 32308 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this g] nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^ meets Q does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge Amphibians, Fish, Mammals and Reptiles List
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge Amphibians, Fish, Mammals and Reptiles List The Okefenokee swamp is covered with Mammals ___Seminole Bat cypress, blackgum, and bay forests (Lasiurus seminolus). A common bat of scattered throughout a flooded prairie ___Virginia Opossum the Okefenokee which is found hanging in made of grasses, sedges, and various (Didelphis virginiana pigna). Common on Spanish Moss during the day. the swamp edge and the islands within aquatic plants. The peripheral upland and ___Hoary Bat the almost 70 islands within the swamp the Swamp. A night prowler. “Pogo” is often seen by campers. (Lasiurus cinereus cinereus). This are forested with pine interspersed with yellowish-brown bat flies high in the air hardwood hammocks. Lakes of varying ___Southern Short-Tailed Shrew late at night and will hang in trees when sizes and depths, and floating sections (Barina carolinensis). A specimen was resting. It is the largest bat in the East of the peat bed, are also part of the found on Floyds Island June 12, 1921. It and eats mostly moths. Okefenokee terrain. kills its prey with poisonous saliva. ___Northern Yellow Bat People have left their mark on the swamp. ___Least Shrew (Lasiurus intermedius floridanus). A 12-mile long canal was dug into the (Cryptotus parva parva). Rarely seen but Apparently a rare species in the area. It eastern prairies in the 1890’s in a failed probably fairly common. Specimens have likes to feed in groups. attempt to drain the swamp. During the been found on several of the islands, on early 1900’s large amounts of timber were the swamp edge, and in the pine woods ___Evening Bat removed, so that very few areas of virgin around the swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity Tolerances for the Major Biotic Components Within the Anclote River and Anchorage and Nearby Coastal Waters
    Salinity Tolerances for the Major Biotic Components within the Anclote River and Anchorage and Nearby Coastal Waters October 2003 Prepared for: Tampa Bay Water 2535 Landmark Drive, Suite 211 Clearwater, Florida 33761 Prepared by: Janicki Environmental, Inc. 1155 Eden Isle Dr. N.E. St. Petersburg, Florida 33704 For Information Regarding this Document Please Contact Tampa Bay Water - 2535 Landmark Drive - Clearwater, Florida Anclote Salinity Tolerances October 2003 FOREWORD This report was completed under a subcontract to PB Water and funded by Tampa Bay Water. i Anclote Salinity Tolerances October 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The comments and direction of Mike Coates, Tampa Bay Water, and Donna Hoke, PB Water, were vital to the completion of this effort. The authors would like to acknowledge the following persons who contributed to this work: Anthony J. Janicki, Raymond Pribble, and Heidi L. Crevison, Janicki Environmental, Inc. ii Anclote Salinity Tolerances October 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Seawater desalination plays a major role in Tampa Bay Water’s Master Water Plan. At this time, two seawater desalination plants are envisioned. One is currently in operation producing up to 25 MGD near Big Bend on Tampa Bay. A second plant is conceptualized near the mouth of the Anclote River in Pasco County, with a 9 to 25 MGD capacity, and is currently in the design phase. The Tampa Bay Water desalination plant at Big Bend on Tampa Bay utilizes a reverse osmosis process to remove salt from seawater, yielding drinking water. That same process is under consideration for the facilities Tampa Bay Water has under design near the Anclote River.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 7: Little River Conservation Area BA LRCA Amendment
    Item 7: Little River Conservation Area BA ITEM 7: Vote on whether to amend the Little River Conservation Area Florida Forever project boundary to add one property totaling approximately 208 acres in Gadsden County with a prorated tax assessed market value of $445,047. LOCATION: Gadsden County DSL STAFF REMARKS: The Little River Conservation Area amendment proposed by Keith Fountain, adds a 208-acre portion of an 825-acre parcel in Gadsden County to the Little River Conservation Area Florida Forever project. The property has a prorated tax assessed market value of $445,047. The property adjacent to the Little River Conservation Area is proposed for less-than-fee acquisition. The landowner, Backhoe Boys LLC, has been contacted and is a willing seller. The property located along the north side of Highway 90 is adjacent to the southwest corner of the current Little River Conservation Area boundary. The project is located within the Tallahassee Red Hills region and contains planted pine with some native understory, mixed hardwood coniferous swamps and mixed wetland hardwood habitat. The property is currently managed by limited thinning of the timber stands and regular prescribed fire. The proposal meets the Florida Forever criteria to be submitted as a boundary amendment. The parcel is less than 1,000 acres, has a tax assessed value of less than $2 million, and is less than 10% of the size of the overall project to which it is being proposed for addition. The proposal area should be designated as essential. Project History: The Little River Conservation Area project in Gadsden County was approved by the Acquisition and Restoration Council in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of the Quail Hunting Lands of Georgia’S Greater Albany Region
    THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE QUAIL HUNTING LANDS OF GEORGIA’S GREATER ALBANY REGION A PUBLICATION OF TALL TIMBERS The Greater Albany region is one Plantations of Southwest Georgia by Rena Divine of the preeminent locations in the United States for wild quail hunting. ollowing the growth of Thomasville and the Red Hills County (21 percent), Calhoun County (13.8 percent) and Lee Fregion in the 1880s as a winter resort and quail hunting County (7.7 percent) had the greatest proportion of acreage destination, like minded visitors sought a similar landscape on (80.5 percent) reported in the survey. the Dougherty Plain. There they found lands rich in fertile soils, a mosaic of old farm fields within large landholdings, and, most importantly, an abundance of wild quail. Though some 100 Greater Albany Regional Results years have passed, the rich legacy of working quail hunting lands continues to thrive in the Albany region. These lands buffer Economic impact the iconic but threatened Flint River, the Chickasawhatchee CEFA estimates that the total economic impact generated by Swamp, and Ichauway-Nochaway Creek, recharge and cleanse wild quail hunting properties in 2018 was over $145 million. regional drinking water supplies, and protect the sensitive This represents a 16 percent increase from Tall Timbers’ 2014 habitat of dozens of imperiled animals and plants. study of these working lands. This total includes more than $76 million in direct local economic impact associated with Albany The natural resource values of the Albany region’s forests, region hunting properties (e.g. buying a woods tractor); more wetlands, and water resources have received a great deal of than $22 million in indirect economic impact (e.g.
    [Show full text]