Workers' Resistance Against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workers' Resistance Against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR International Publications Key Workplace Documents 2013 Workers' Resistance Against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Reiner Tosstorff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/intl Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. Support this valuable resource today! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Key Workplace Documents at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. If you have a disability and are having trouble accessing information on this website or need materials in an alternate format, contact [email protected] for assistance. Workers' Resistance Against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Abstract Eighty years ago, the delegation of national socialist Germany made an early exit from the International Labour Conference. An attempt to install the German Labour Front as legitimate worker representatives, instead of the free trade unions, had failed due to resistance from the Workers’ Group and, not least, the persistent silence maintained by Wilhelm Leuschner, the German unions’ representative on the ILO Governing Body. Wilhelm Leuschner was a courageous man whose actions were carefully thought through, and right from the start he was an opponent of the Nazi regime. As a resistance fighter for Germany and against Hitler, he was murdered by the Nazis in 1944. In June 1933, his participation in the International Labour Conference opened up the possibility of going into exile, but he opted instead to resist from inside Germany. That decision no doubt explains why he chose to pillory the regime by keeping silent at the International Labour Conference, rather than voicing public protests. Like so many other people in 1933, Leuschner had no idea of just how far the national socialists would later take their lust for annihilation and terror. But what was quite clear by 2 May 1933 at the latest, when the Nazis banned the free German trade unions, occupied their premises and packed countless trade unionists off to the concentration camps, was that even gestures of submission and far-reaching concessions to the Nazis would do nothing to ensure the organizational survival of trade unions that three generations of German workers had built up into one of Europe’s most powerful trade union organizations. At the same time, open political resistance in June 1933 would almost certainly have meant ill-treatment, torture and imprisonment, without in any way improving the chances of success. In this situation, Wilhelm Leuschner needed to adopt the right tactics for his appearance at the International Labour Conference, and the Workers’ Group had to ponder how it could effectively show solidarity with the German unions without exposing German trade unionists, and Wilhelm Leuschner in particular, to even greater danger. Reiner Tosstorff’s study sets out to describe and understand this complex set of circumstances. And looking beyond this concrete individual case, it still raises issues that are still relevant today. Keywords Nazi Germany, International Labour Conference, Wilhelm Leuschner, trade unions, dictatorships Comments Suggested Citation Tosstorff, R. (2013). Workers' resistance against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference, 1933. Geneva: International Labour Office. The original version of this book has been published in German language under the title “Wilhelm Leuschner gegen Robert Ley. Ablehnung der Nazi-Diktatur durch die Internationale Arbeitskonferenz 1933 in Genf ” by: VAS - Verlag für Akademische Schriften Ludwigstr. 12 61348 Bad Homburg Germany www.vas-verlag.de In order to make the text more suitable for an international readership and for editorial reasons, some details concerning mainly German history have been omitted to favour a more ILO oriented perspective. Readers interested in the original version should either contact the publishing house or the author. This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/intl/306 Workers’ resistance against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Five months after the National Socialists took power in Germany, the workers’ group and the German delegation clashed at the International Labour Conference 1933 Conference 1933 in Geneva. Only a few weeks before, the National Socialists had destroyed the German free trade union movement and set up a compulsory organisation, the German Labour Front (DAF). Nazi-Germany sought international recognition for this organisation from the ILO and the League of Nations respectively. Furthermore it Reiner Tosstorff wanted to sell Germany as a leader of social progress. However, the steps caused severe protest, especially among the workers’ delegates. Their protest finally turned out to be successful, on one hand because of a severe diplomatic incidence caused by Robert Ley, the new workers’ delegate imposed by Nazi-Germany, on the other hand, because the heads of the German delegation were unable to pressure Wilhelm Leuschner, representative of the former free German trade unions to publi- cly support the regime. At the ILC 1933 the international trade union movement, insisting once more on its core values of freedom and solidarity, stood in fierce opposition to the Nazi-dictatorship and its oppression of political and social rights. Workers’ resistance against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Labour Nazi the against International Conference Germany resistance at Workers’ ILO Workers’ resistance against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Reiner Tosstorff The original version of this book has been published in German language under the title “Wilhelm Leuschner gegen Robert Ley. Ablehnung der Nazi-Diktatur durch die Internationale Arbeitskonferenz 1933 in Genf ” by: VAS - Verlag für Akademische Schriften Ludwigstr. 12 61348 Bad Homburg Germany www.vas-verlag.de In order to make the text more suitable for an international readership and for editorial reasons, some details concerning mainly German history have been omitted to favour a more ILO oriented perspective. Readers interested in the original version should either contact the publishing house or the author. Workers’ resistance against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Reiner Tosstorff INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE • GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2013 First published 2013 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Workers’ resistance against Nazi Germany at the International Labour Conference 1933 Reiner Tosstorff; International Labour Office - Geneva: ILO, 2013 ISBN 978-92-2-127539-8 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-127540-4 (PDF web) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. ILO publications and electronic products can be obtained through major booksellers or ILO local offices in many countries, or direct from ILO Publications, International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. Catalogues or lists of new publications are available free of charge from the above address, or by email: [email protected] Visit our website: www.ilo.org/publns Photocomposed in Switzerland SCR Printed in Switzerland GEN Contents Preface .............................................. vii Abbreviations .......................................... xiii 1. Introduction ........................................ 1 2. The context: world economic crisis, fascism and the situation of the International Labour Organization ..................... 3 3. Workers’ delegate Wilhelm Leuschner’s role in the run-up to the June 1933 ILC ......................... 7 4. The “Third Reich” delegation ............................ 11 5. Conference prelude: a question of credentials ................ 15 6. Robert Ley’s racist outbursts and growing resistance
Recommended publications
  • Germany Key Words
    Germany Key Words Anti–Semitism Hatred of the Jews. Article 48 Part of the Weimar Constitution, giving the President special powers to rule in a crisis. Used By Chancellors to rule when they had no majority in the Reichstag – and therefore an undemocratic precedent for Hitler. Aryan Someone who Belongs to the European type race. To the Nazis this meant especially non– Jewish and they looked for the ideal characteristics of fair hair, Blue eyes... Autobahn Motorway – showpieces of the Nazi joB creation schemes Bartering Buying goods with other goods rather than money. (As happened in the inflation crisis of 1923) Bavaria Large state in the South of Germany. Hitler & Nazis’ original Base. Capital – Munich Beerhall Putsch Failed attempt to seize power By Hitler in NovemBer 1923. Hitler jailed for five years – in fact released Dec 1924 Brown Shirts The name given to the S.A. Centre Party Party representing Roman Catholics – one of the Weimar coalition parties. Dissolves itself July 1933. Chancellor Like the Prime Minister – the man who is the chief figure in the government, Coalition A government made up of a number of parties working together, Because of the election system under Weimar, all its governments were coalitions. They are widely seen as weak governments. Conscription Compulsory military service – introduced by Hitler April1935 in his drive to build up Germany’s military strength (against the terms of the Versailles Treaty) Conservatives In those who want to ‘conserve’ or resist change. In Weimar Germany it means those whose support for the RepuBlic was either weak or non–existent as they wanted a return to Germany’s more ordered past.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Nazi Germany Revision Guide
    Life in Nazi Germany Revision Guide Name: Key Topics 1. Nazi control of Germany 2. Nazi social policies 3. Nazi persecution of minorities @mrthorntonteach The Nazi Police State The Nazis used a number of Hitler was the head of the Third ways to control the German Reich and the country was set up to population, one of these was follow his will, from the leaders to the Police State. This meant the the 32 regional Gauleiter. Nazis used the police (secret and regular) to control what the As head of the government, Hitler people did and said, it was had complete control over Germany control using fear and terror. from politics, to the legal system and police. The Nazis use of threat, fear and intimidation was their most powerful tool to control the German All this meant there was very little people opposition to Nazi rule between 1933-39 The Gestapo The Gestapo, set up in 1933 were the Nazi secret police, they were the most feared Nazi organization. They looked for enemies of the Nazi Regime and would use any methods necessary; torture, phone tapping, informers, searching mail and raids on houses. They were no uniforms, meaning anyone could be a member of the Gestapo. They could imprison you without trial, over 160,000 were arrested for ‘political crimes’ and thousands died in custody. The SS The SS were personal bodyguards of Adolf Hitler but became an intelligence, security and police force of 240,000 Ayrans under Himmler. They were nicknamed the ‘Blackshirts’ after their uniform They had unlimited power to do what they want to rid of threats to Germany, The SS were put in charge of all the police and security forces in Germany, they also ran the concentration camps in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockausgabe Zum Jahrestag Des Attentats Auf Adolf Hitler Am 20
    Blockausgabe zum Jahrestag des Attentats auf Adolf Hitler am 20. Juli 1944 DEM DEUTSCHEN WIDERSTAND ZUM JAHRESTAG DES 20. JULI 1944 / 1964 Rudolf Heitefuss Das missglückte Attentat vom 20. Juli 1944 hatte zum Ziel, nicht nur Adolf Hitler zu beseitigen, sondern vor allem den nach Meinung der Attentäter sinnlosen, nicht mehr zu gewinnenden Krieg zu beenden. Der Kreis der Verschwörer ging weit über die im Briefmarkenblock zum 20. Jahrestag des Attentats genannten Personen hinaus. An der Verschwörung beteiligten sich namhafte Persönlichkeiten der Wehrmacht und der Verwaltung, viele aus Kreisen des Adels, die dem Nationalsozialismus gegenüber kritisch eingestellt waren. Maßgebend war in diesen Kreisen, vor allem nach der Katastrophe von Stalingrad die Auffassung, dass es nur nach Beseitigung Hitlers möglich wäre, zu einem erträglichen Friedensschluss zu kommen. Unsägliches Leid der Kriegsjahre 1944 /45 wäre dem deutschen Volke erspart geblieben. Das Schicksal hat es anders gewollt, das Verhängnis nahm seinen Lauf. Das gescheiterte Attentat war Anlass für eine gnadenlose Verfolgung und Vernichtung der Beteiligten. Mehr als 200 von ihnen wurden hingerichtet, unter ihnen der Generalfeldmarschall Erwin von Witzleben, 19 Generäle, 26 Oberste, mehrere Diplomaten, Staatssekretäre und andere hohe Verwaltungsbeamte. Der Briefmarkenblock von 1964 würdigt auch Personen, die unabhängig vom 20. Juli Widerstand gegen das Regime der Nationalsozialisten leisteten und mit dem Leben bezahlen mussten. Einigen von ihnen wurden auch später noch Sondermarken gewidmet. Sophie Scholl 1921 – 1943 Sophie Scholl wurde am 9. Mai 1921 als Tochter von Robert Scholl und seiner Frau Magdalena, geb.Müller, in Forchtenberg, Baden-Württemberg, geboren. Sie wuchs zusammen mit vier Geschwistern zunächst in Forchtenberg, dann in Ludwigsburg und ab 1932 in Ulm auf und wurde von den Eltern im Sinne christlich – humanistischer Werte erzogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Mommsen, Hans, Germans Against Hitler
    GERMANS AGAINST HITLER HANS MOMMSEN GERMANSGERMANSGERMANS AGAINSTAGAINST HITLERHITLER THE STAUFFENBERG PLOT AND RESISTANCE UNDER THE THIRD REICH Translated and annotated by Angus McGeoch Introduction by Jeremy Noakes New paperback edition published in 2009 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com First published in hardback in 2003 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd as Alternatives to Hitler. Originally published in 2000 as Alternative zu Hitler – Studien zur Geschichte des deutschen Widerstandes. Copyright © Verlag C.H. Beck oHG, Munchen, 2000 Translation copyright © I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 2003, 2009 The translation of this work has been supported by Inter Nationes, Bonn. The right of Hans Mommsen to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN 978 1 84511 852 5 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library Project management by Steve Tribe, Andover Printed and bound in India by Thomson Press India Ltd ContentsContentsContents Preface by Hans Mommsen vii Introduction by Jeremy Noakes 1 1. Carl von Ossietzky and the concept of a right to resist in Germany 9 2. German society and resistance to Hitler 23 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hortensienstrasse 50. the Kreisau Circle and the 20Th of July Thomas Childers University of Tennessee - Knoxville
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1971 Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July Thomas Childers University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Childers, Thomas, "Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1971. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3110 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Thomas Childers entitled "Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Arthur G. Haas, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Edward Chmielewski, Edwin H. Trainer, Galen Broeker Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) July 19, 1971 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Thomas Childers entitled "Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July." I recommend that it be accepted for twelve quarter hours of credit in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of ·Science( with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness to History
    WITNESS TO HISTORY A book by Michael Walsh This book will not break your heart, it will crush your heart in sorrow and compassion for all mankind. This one book, ABOVE ALL OTHERS I've read, puts together information using statements from historical figures in a way that, I believe, will erase doubts from any doubting Thomas that one of the biggest lies -- or mass of massive lies -- we've ever been told involve WWII, German National Socialism; its Chancellor, Adolf Hitler; and in fact WHO made that war happen. As I was reading this book to the listeners of our Sweet Liberty radio broadcast, we discovered the REAL hot-button. I received a phone call from WWCR questioning my 'motives' for presenting this information. THAT was a first, and reinforced my desire to share the information with as many as will listen/read/hear/see through the biggest lie. I continued to read until finally it became nearly impossible for listeners to hear the broadcast on a once-crystal clear frequency; on two occasions we were actually knocked off the air-waves. When the subject matter changed, the reception cleared up. From this I've realized that the lie must be maintained at all costs; we MUST hate Adolf Hitler with all the venom a serpent can muster or the perpetrators of the lie begin frothing at the mouth. Although the material presented on the broadcast is always controversial, and although the quality of our short-wave reception seems to be manipulated depending upon the topic at hand, this one subject is taboo, period.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi State Domino Test
    THE RISE OF THE NAZIS AND THE NAZI STATE DOMINOES TEST CUT UP THE ATTACHED ‘DOMINOES’. THE ‘START’ DOMINO BEGINS. PLACE THE CORRECT SENTENCE ENDING TO THE DOMINO BEFORE. WHEN YOU HAVE REPEATED THIS SEVERAL TIMES, TRY THIS SELF-TEST: When was Hitler appointed as Chancellor? Who appointed Hitler as Chancellor? Who would be the Vice Chancellor in Hitler’s coalition government in January 1933? How did the President and Vice Chancellor believe they could use Hitler? What happened on the 27th February 1933? How did Hitler increase his power on 28th February 1933? What happened in the election of 5 March 1933? How did Hitler use the Enabling Act (24th March 1933)? What did the Nazis burn in May 1933? Who was ‘purged’in June 1933? Why and with what results? Who died in August 1934 and what did this lead to? What Nazi agencies did Hitler use to extend Nazi police control? Where was the first concentration camp? What racial laws were implemented in 1935? What did they enforce? What happened on 9th November 1938? Give 3 methods of Nazi propaganda. How did the Nazis indoctrinate Germany’s youth in schooling? How did the Nazis organize the leisure of Germany’s youth? What aims did the Nazis have for German women? How did the Nazis carry out an ‘economic miracle’? How were German workers affected by Nazi policies? How and why did German people oppose the Nazis? 2 Start January 1933. Hitler became Chancellor in He was appointed by President Hindenburg. control Hitler. Hindenburg and von Papen Before 1933, Hitler had taken thought they could advantage of the effects of the Depression to increase his Reichstag Fire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch NSB and Nazi Germany, 1933–1940
    Articles 29/3 7/6/99 12:58 pm Page 349 Dietrich Orlow A Difficult Relationship of Unequal Relatives: The Dutch NSB and Nazi Germany, 1933–1940 Until its recent reappearance in the guise of neo-fascism, European fascism had appeared to many as a transitory political phenomenon that was limited to a brief, albeit fateful, appear- ance on the modern historical scene. This conclusion contrasted strikingly with the attitude of fascism’s contemporaries in the 1920s and 1930s. For them — whether militants, sympathizers, or opponents — fascism was a serious challenge to liberal demo- cracy and Marxist socialism. The fascists themselves, of course, fully endorsed the idea that they represented an international, revolutionary vanguard, which would save European civilization from the forces of decadent bourgeois liberalism and the hordes of Marxist Bolshevism.1 As self-styled components of an international and revolution- ary phenomenon, individual fascist movements deliberately attempted to use the experiences of their ‘sister’ parties to advance their own cause. This was particularly true if the neighbouring movement had already succeeded in establishing a national fascist regime. The following analysis of the relations between the Dutch Nationaal Socialistische Beweging (NSB) and the German Nazis in the 1930s is a case study that demonstrates vividly the illusionary promises and inherent contradictions of fascist internationalism. From its beginnings the NSB looked upon itself as an integral part of the coming fascist revolution in Europe. Although like all fascist movements, the NSB was fiercely nationalistic, the party presented no original ideology of its own; all of its programme was adapted, or better copied, from the Italian fascists and the German Nazis.
    [Show full text]
  • North Woods History Honours 27Th March 2019 Dressing the Reich: the Fear and Elegance in Nazi Uniforms Germany Was a Nation Both Clad and Obsessed with the Uniform
    Woods 1 North Woods History Honours 27th March 2019 Dressing the Reich: The Fear and Elegance in Nazi Uniforms Germany was a nation both clad and obsessed with the uniform. Brian L. Davis, a uniform historian describes 240 different uniforms from the time of the Third Reich era. From coal miners, to Post Office employees, all the way up the Nazi hierarchy to Adolf Hitler himself, every man in the Reich had a uniform, in an “appeal to male vanity.”1 Bernhard Teicher, in his memoir, writes of his time as a young soldier in Nazi Germany, “Of course, we were issued uniforms (ideally everybody in the Nazi Reich should have worn a uniform!).”2 The Nazi Party’s ​ ​ desire for uniformity of thought and support extended directly to the propagandistic powers of the clothes that bore the Nazi insignia on the backs the German citizenry. True to its latin root ‘uni,’ the uniform served as a unifier in Nazi Germany. Adolf Hitler believed that he was not a politician, but an artist at heart.3 In Thomas Mann’s 1938 essay, Brother Hitler, Mann asks in regard to Hitler and Nazism, “how can we fail ​ ​ to recognise in this phenomenon a sign of artistry?”4 From 1933 to 1945, this artistry would come to dominate Nazi rule; from architecture, to ceremony, to style and fashion. This artistry was heavily applied by the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda to create and use new techniques in propaganda to market the ideologies of the Third Reich. Although propaganda was not exclusive to the Nazis, their dedication to the art of political marketing was a novel approach to the dissemination of ideological, political and militaristic values within the German, European and world citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918 – 39
    Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918 – 39 GCSE History Revision Guide Name: ___________ Form: ____________ 1 How do I answer paper 3? This page introduces you to the main features and requirements of the Paper 3 exam. About Paper 3 The Paper 3 exam lasts for Paper 3 is for your modern depth study. 1 hour and 20 minutes (80 Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918-39 is option 31. minutes). There are 52 It is divided up into two sections: Section A and Section B. You must answer all questions in both sections. marks in total. You should You will receive two documents: a question paper, which you spend approximately 25 write on, and a Sources/ Interpretations booklet which you will minutes on Section A and need for section B. 55 minutes on Section B. The questions Question 1 targets analysing, evaluating Section A: Question 1 and using sources to make judgements. Give two things you can infer from Source A about…. (4 Spend about six minutes on this question, marks) which focuses on inference and analysing sources. Look out for the key term ‘infer’. Complete the table. Section A: Question 2 Explain why …. (12 marks) Question 2 targets both showing knowledge and understanding of the topic Two prompts and your own information. and explaining and analysing events using historical concepts such as causation, Section B: Question 3(a) consequence, change, continuity, similarity How useful are sources B and C for an enquiry into….? (8 and difference. Spend about 18 minutes on marks) this question. Use the sources and your knowledge of the historical context.
    [Show full text]
  • Stolperbildung211 Widerstandsweg Koblenz
    ZENTRUM INNERE FÜHRUNG STUDIUM GENERALE WIDERSTANDSWEG KOBLENZ Langfassung Stand: 12.08.2021 „In Deutschland lebte eine Opposition, die durch ihre Opfer und eine entnervende internationale Politik immer schwächer wurde, aber zu dem Edelsten und Größten gehört, was in der Geschichte aller Völker je hervorgebracht wurde. Diese Männer kämpften ohne eine Hilfe von innen oder außen - einzig getrieben von der Unruhe des Gewissens. So lange sie lebten, waren sie für uns unsichtbar und unerkennbar, weil sie sich tarnen mussten. Aber an den Toten ist der Widerstand sichtbar geworden.“ (Winston Churchill) Zentrum Innere Führung Widerstandsweg Koblenz 2 STARTPUNKT: 1 BALTHASAR-NEUMANN-STRAßE / WILHELM-LEUSCHNER-STRAßE, KOBLENZ Zentrum Innere Führung Widerstandsweg Koblenz 3 STARTPUNKT: BALTHASAR-NEUMANN-STRAßE / 1 WILHELM-LEUSCHNER-STRAßE, KOBLENZ Der Widerstandsweg auf der Augusta-Kaserne Johannes Popitz Pfaffendorfer Höhe, Koblenz Julius Leber Die Pfaffendorfer Höhe in Koblenz ist 1 Dietrich Bonhoeffer gekennzeichnet durch zahlreiche Straßen, Ludwig Schwamb Geschwister Scholl die nach einer Widerstandskämpferin und 16 Alfred Delp Widerstandskämpfern gegen den Erwin Planck Ludwig Beck Nationalsozialismus benannt sind. Carl Friedrich Goerdeler Wilhelm Leuschner Sie sind umgeben von drei militärischen Zentrum Innere Führung Liegenschaften, von denen das Zentrum Innere Führung eine herausragende Rolle einnimmt: hier Franz Leuninger werden das Selbstverständnis und die Carlo Mierendorff Führungskultur der Bundeswehr ausgebildet und Jakob Kaiser weiterentwickelt. Doch was bedeutet „Innere Führung“ und was hat sie mit „Widerstand“ zu tun? Paul Schneider Erwin von Witzleben Der Widerstandsweg soll Sie mitnehmen auf eine Reise durch die Geschichte und dabei beispielhaft Clemens August Graf von Galen anhand verschiedener Persönlichkeiten aufzeigen, wie Menschen sich in der dunkelsten Zeit der Gneisenau-Kaserne deutschen Vergangenheit „von innen geführt“ haben und wie daraus ein neuer Geist für eine neue Armee wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Administrators of the Third Reich, Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-54893-1 228 GLOSSARY of GERMAN TERMS and ORGANISATIONS
    GLOSSARY OF GERMAN TERMS AND ORGANISATIONS Anfangs-Stenotypist Trainee typist Aufseherin/nen Female concentration camp guard/s Auslandsorganisation NSDAP organisation for party members living outside of the Third Reich Ausrottung Annihilation Blitzmädchen Lightening girl; nickname given to Nachrichtenhelferinnen Bund Deutscher Frauenvererine (BDF) League of German Women’s Organisations Bund Deutscher Mädel (BDM) League of German Girls Deutsch-Kolonialer Frauenbund German Colonial Women’s league Deutschblütigen Full-blooded Germans Deutsche Arbeitsfront (DAF) German Labour Front Deutsche Jugend (DJ) German Youth movement Deutsches Afrika Korps German Africa Corps (later known as the Panzer Armee Afrika) Deutschtum Germanness Dienstverweigerung Denial of service Einsatzkommando A sub-group of five Einsatzgruppen, mobile killing units Fernschreiberin Teleprinter operator Flakhelferin Female anti-aircraft auxiliary Flintenweiber Gun woman Frauendienst Women’s service Führeranwärterin Female candidate for leader Führerin Female leader (continued ) © The Author(s) 2017 227 R. Century, Female Administrators of the Third Reich, Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-54893-1 228 GLOSSARY OF GERMAN TERMS AND ORGANISATIONS (continued) Führernotiz Note from the Führer Führerpaket Gift sent to families of those supporting the war effort Gauleiter Regional leader Gefälligkeitspässen Passports of convenience Geheimraum Secret room Geheimnisträgerin Female keeper of secrets Gemeinnützige Stiftung für Literally: ‘Charitable
    [Show full text]