Screen Australia Television Funding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Screen Australia Television Funding Australian Broadcasting Corporation submission to Screen Australia Television Funding A Review of Screen Australia’s Role and Objectives 2010 August 2010 ABC Submission to Screen Australia’s Television Funding Review 2010 1 Executive Summary The ABC proposes, in relation to Screen Australia’s current review, the following outcomes: • A clear articulation of Screen Australia’s strategic intentions, in relation to production and broadcasting industries, including the national broadcasters, and an undertaking to explore with industry ways in which to increase transparency in relation to decision- making, funding and guidelines. • Screen Australia should consider increasing partnerships with broadcasters in relation to feature film funding. Support for a 40% Producer Offset for high-end television drama, including children’s drama, and documentaries, subject to appropriate guidelines. • Should Government agree to an enhanced Offset, a continuation of Screen Australia’s role in relation to terms of trade, with minimum licence fees becoming part of the certification process. • If a 40% Producer Offset were to eventuate, Screen Australia should consider alternative ways to support the sector, including: (a) targeted development strategies for television drama, including resource-intensive approaches, extended development and workshops; (b) more engagement with young innovators and innovation strategies for content delivered to Australian screens; (c) an alternative approach to programs with artistic and cultural merit, which could encompass broadcasts of live events. • In the absence of a 40% Producer Offset, continue Screen Australia’s role as gap “financier”. • Consider the meaning and funding available for Nationally Significant Programming in the context of national free-to-air broadcasting. • Explore initiatives to fund a variety of nationally-significant Indigenous programs, and so continue to build the Indigenous independent film sector. • Re-affirm and develop the relationship between the ABC and Screen Australia in relation to documentaries; review and formalise the funding split for domestic documentaries; acknowledge the importance of “slate financing” in the building of a sustainable sector; and recognise the ongoing benefits of the National Documentary Program (NDP) and tied funding. • Screen Australia should maintain its current approach on minimum licence fees, and restate the case for free-to-air broadcasters and pay-TV in relation to the NDP. • Acknowledge and act on the validity of the ABC’s concerns in relation to children’s programming, as they relate to branding, the necessity for holdbacks, and the need for pay-TV to make a stronger contribution to licence fees. ABC Submission to Screen Australia’s Television Funding Review 2010 2 Introduction The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to Screen Australia’s review of its role and objectives in relation to television funding. As a statutory corporation under the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983 (“the ABC Act”), the ABC seeks a presence on all major electronic media platforms. The ABC Act, which includes the ABC Charter, requires the Corporation to provide access to all Australians to a range of information, entertainment and other programming. As a result, the ABC plays an important role in contributing to Australia’s screen culture. The ABC Charter requires that the Corporation broadcast programs that “contribute to a sense of national identity and inform and entertain, and reflect the cultural diversity of, the Australian community…” Diverse, high-quality and innovative local content, which is of national significance and which engages with Australian audiences, is at the centre of the ABC’s Charter obligations, and such programming finds a home on ABC1, ABC2 and the recently-launched ABC3 for children. The Corporation recognises the tremendous cultural benefits generated for Australians by government support for Australian content through a variety of mechanisms, including tax rebates, contestable direct funding, funding of the national broadcasters and regulations specifying minimum local content levels. In particular, many ABC programs, such as documentaries, short-form mini-series and children’s drama programming, involve funding provided by Screen Australia. The ABC plays an integral role in the broadcasting environment and is intimately involved in supporting and sustaining an independent production sector. From 2006–07 to 2008–09, the Corporation’s commitment to independent production across all genres was $144 million. This contributed to production budgets of $318 million, delivering almost 700 hours of Australian content to Australian audiences. Historically, the ABC has been a leader in the delivery of innovative and high-quality Australian drama, although resourcing or funding issues have impeded its ability to do this in some periods. Significant increased funding for drama in the 2009 Federal Budget has enabled the ABC to resume a leading role, working with industry partners to develop, finance and produce Australia drama for delivery across an increasing range of platforms to the Australian community. The Australian Government’s 2009 increase in ABC funding involved two significant outcomes: • $67 million over three years for a new dedicated children’s channel, ABC3; and • $70 million for local drama production over three years. ABC Submission to Screen Australia’s Television Funding Review 2010 3 The ABC‘s expects that over the current funding triennium—from 2009 to 2012—it will commit $238 million, generating over 1,000 hours of production ultimately worth over $400 million. This will include $82 million for new Australian drama, generating 133 hours of content and a total of $130 million in Australian production. It will also include $26 million for Australian comedies, generating 43 hours of content valued at $35 million. The ABC will allocate a further $48 million to Australian children’s programming over the three years, generating over 450 hours of production worth over $100 million. It will spend some $90 million for Australian documentaries, entertainment and factual programs, generating 405 hours of content and, ultimately, $150 million in production. The ABC will need to work with Screen Australia to reach these targets. As a broadcaster closely involved with the independent production sector, with funding bodies, and with providing Australian content to Australian audiences, the ABC has a keen interest in and engagement with the cultural policy settings that apply to the creation of audiovisual content, and which are designed to promote and support the creation of high- quality local content for Australian audiences. Accordingly, the ABC suggests that the following matters should be considered in relation to Screen Australia’s objectives and role, especially when considering television programming funding in what is now a rapidly-changing media landscape involving many new forms of content delivery and business activity, none of which has yet delivered a satisfactory business model for funding high-end television productions. The Role of Screen Australia Strategic Intentions The first term of reference for the Review is to: 1. Confirm the objectives and role of Screen Australia with regard to television funding, taking into account levels of investment and the role the agency has in developing and producing innovative and nationally significant television programming. The ABC acknowledges and values the vital role that Screen Australia plays in supporting the development and sustainability of Australia’s independent production sector. The ABC and Screen Australia share a common interest in ensuring that Australian audiences have access to high-quality, innovative and culturally-significant Australian-made television content and, to that end, have engaged in various formal and informal partnerships to deliver these shared goals. As a television broadcaster, the ABC naturally has a focus on television content, and on developing and refining an appropriate mix of measures to ensure that high-quality television content continues to be produced. There is currently a significant alignment between the ABC and Screen Australia in relation to policy and the funding of Australian television content. The ABC welcomes this Review as an opportunity to identify and confirm ABC Submission to Screen Australia’s Television Funding Review 2010 4 common goals and identify further opportunities for collaboration and partnerships, and so continue to leverage these synergies to deliver content. This review also provides a timely opportunity for Screen Australia to define its objectives and role in relation to television funding. Broadcast television is, and will remain for the foreseeable future, the most significant source for the funding and delivery of Australian content to Australian audiences. In the ABC’s view, it is important for Screen Australia to articulate its strategic intentions with regard to its relationship to the independent sector and the broadcasting sector, especially the national broadcasters, in the context of its overall framework for funding. The national broadcasters are another key source of direct government funding for Australian television programming, and it is important that Screen Australia presents a vision regarding the way it sits in the policy landscape, along with the national broadcasters, as one of the Government’s policy levers for such programming.
Recommended publications
  • Bands, Frequency, Data 9.25.12
    Band How Often Played? Year Formed City (State, County, Province…) Country 1 Nightwish 14 1996 Kitee Finland 2 Amaranthe 11 2008 Gothenburg Sweden 3 Firewind 11 1998 Thessaloniki Greece 4 Iron Maiden 11 1975 London England 5 Primal Fear 11 1997 Esslingen Baden-Württemberg Germany 6 Lullacry 10 1998 Helsinki Finland 7 Megadeth 10 1983 Los Angeles California United States 8 Charon 9 1992 Raahe Finland 9 Trivium 9 2000 Orlando Florida United States 10 Avenged Sevenfold 8 1999 Huntington Beach California United States 11 Deathstars 8 2000 Stockholm Sweden 12 Dream Evil 8 1999 Gothenburg Sweden 13 Sentenced 8 1989 Muhos/Oulu Finland 14 Skid Row 8 1986 Toms River New Jersey United States 15 The Cult 8 1983 Bradford West Yorkshire England 16 The Slot 8 2002 Moscow Russia 17 Bullet For My Valentine 7 1998 Bridgend Wales 18 Epica 7 2002 Reuver Limburg Netherlands 19 In Flames 7 1990 Gothenburg Sweden 20 Riot 7 1975 New York City New York United States 21 Staind 7 1995 Springfield Massachusetts United States 22 Bayside 6 2000 Queens New York United States 23 Entwine 6 1995 Lahti Finland 24 Eye Empire 6 2009 Florida/Georgia/Ohio United States 25 HIM 6 1991 Helsinki Finland 26 Park Lane 6 27 Racer X 6 1985 Los Angeles California United States 28 Rammstein 6 1994 Berlin Germany 29 Ratt 6 1976 San Diego California United States 30 Scattershock 6 1989 Berkeley California United States 31 Sevendust 6 1994 Atlanta Georgia United States 32 Bad Religion 5 1979 Los Angeles California United States 33 Black Veil Brides 5 2006 Cincinnati Ohio United States 34 Bloodbound 5 2004 Bollnäs Sweden 35 Close Your Eyes 5 2005 Abilene Texas United States 36 Coheed & Cambria 5 1995 Nyack New York United States 37 Dead Letter Circus 5 2004 Brisbane Queensland Australia 38 Dokken 5 1976 Los Angeles California United States 39 Danger, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Oct. 2019 Valencia (Spain) Index Officials Projects Profiles Participants Practical
    CARTOON >>> e-Catalogue 30 sept. - 2 oct. 2019 valencia (spain) Index Officials Projects profiles participants practical Map & Venues Social Events Blurbs How to navigate? HOW TO NAVIGATE? IT’S EASY! You have uploaded and saved the e-Catalogue Cartoon Springboard 2019 on your tablet/smartphone/ computer using Adobe Acrobat Reader. This enhanced digital version will allow you to take notes, make quick searches, and contact other participants with a simple “click”. HOW TO ACCESS THE DIFFERENT PAGES? THE PROJECTS THE PARTICIPANTS To reach the projects’ pages, just click on the button Click on “Participants” in the main Index or in the tabs “Projects” in the main Index or in the tabs above. above. They are all listed by alphabetical order. Click on This will redirect you to the projects’ Index. the email next to their photo to contact them directly. Click on the project you wish to view. You can also use the search tool and bookmarks You can also use the search tool and bookmarks (see below). (see below). The navigation stays the same to access other information in the e-Catalogue. Do not forget: the easiest way to access everything is by using the tabs at the top of the pages. HOW TO USE THE MAIN FUNCTIONS AVAILABLE IN ADOBE ACROBAT READER? VIEW MODES GO TO PAGES These modes allow you to read/turn Don’t want to scroll all the pages? It’s easy: the pages in different ways: TAP on the page number; you can then enter Continuous: scroll vertically. the number of the page you want to go to.
    [Show full text]
  • Marylyn Dintenfass
    M A R Y L Y N D I N T E N F A S S www.marylyndintenfass.com SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2017 Garrison Art Center, Garrison, New York, Ocular.Echo 2015 Driscoll Babcock Galleries, New York, Oculus 2015 The University of Minnesota, Morris, Morrison Gallery, Marylyn Dintenfass: Painted Anthology 2012/13Driscoll Babcock Galleries, New York, Drop Dead Gorgeous 2012 Flint Institute of Art, Flint, Michigan, Auto Biography and Other Anecdotes 2011 Babcock Galleries, New York, Souped Up/Tricked Out 2011 Bob Rauschenberg Gallery, Edison State College, Fort Myers, Florida, Marylyn Dintenfass 2010 Babcock Galleries, New York, Marylyn Dintenfass: Parallel Park 2009 Babcock Galleries, New York, Marylyn Dintenfass: Good & Plenty Juicy 2006 Greenville County Museum of Art, Greenville, South Carolina, Marylyn Dintenfass Paintings 2006 Mississippi Museum of Art, Jackson, Work in Progress: Marylyn Dintenfass 2006 Franklin Riehlman Fine Art, New York, Marylyn Dintenfass: Recent Paintings 2006 Pelter Gallery, Greenville, South Carolina, Marylyn Dintenfass: Works on Paper 1994 Hamline University, Saint Paul, Minnesota, Marylyn Dintenfass: Clay in Print 1991 Terry Dintenfass Gallery, New York, Paradigm Series 1985 The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Bus Terminal, 42nd Street, New York, A.R.E.A. Project, Site Installation, Imprint Fresco 1980 Katonah Museum of Art, Katonah, New York, Tracks & Traces 1979 Robert L. Kidd Galleries, Birmingham, Michigan, Porcelain Progressions 1978 Bell Gallery, Greenwich, Connecticut, Porcelain Progressions 1977 Schenectady
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Watch by Lally Katz
    state ed Neighbourhood Watch by lally katz 2 24 May 2014 Dunstan Playhouse duration approx: Approx 2 hours & 20 mins (including interval) suitable for Years 10 - 12 DWS performance followed by a 20 - 30 min Q&A session Study Guide Neighbourhood Watch 2 By Robyn Brookes © 2014 Index Index .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 CAST & CREATIVE TEAM ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 CREW .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 PLAYWRIGHT ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Lally Katz ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 INTERVIEW WITH LALLY KATZ .......................................................................................................................................... 6 DIRECTOR.........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friends with Benefits a Report on Australia’S International Co-Production Program Australia’S Co-Production Program Has Resulted in 132 Co-Productions to Date
    Friends with benefits A report on Australia’s International Co-production Program Australia’s co-production program has resulted in 132 co-productions to date. canada, the UK and france represent the highest level of activity. feature films make up the largest proportion and have been the most consistently produced format. However, children’s programs – animation in particular – have increased since the mid-1990s. © Screen Australia 2012 ISBN: 978-1-920998-18-9 The text in this report is released subject to a Creative Commons BY licence (Licence). This means, in summary, that you may reproduce, transmit and distribute the text, provided that you do not do so for commercial purposes, and provided that you attribute the text as extracted from Screen Australia’s Friends with benefits: A report on Australia's International Co-production Program. You must not alter, transform or build upon the text in this report. Your rights under the Licence are in addition to any fair dealing rights which you have under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth). For further terms of the Licence, please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/3.0/. You are not licensed to reproduce, transmit or distribute any still photographs contained in this report. Screen Australia is grateful to all those that contributed data to the compilation of this report. The data provided in this survey has been drawn from a number of sources. Screen Australia has undertaken all reasonable measures to ensure its accuracy and therefore cannot accept responsibility for inaccuracies and omissions. Cover picture: Bright Star (feature, Australia/UK) screened in Competition at Cannes in 2009, and had multiple international festival screenings including Pusan, Telluride and Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue Contents
    2018 CATALOGUE CONTENTS 01 ADVENTURE & TRAVEL 03 02 CHILDREN & FAMILY 19 03 COMEDY & ENTERTAINMENT 49 04 CRIME & INVESTIGATION 55 05 DRAMA & TELEMOVIES 79 06 FACTUAL ENTERTAINMENT 89 07 HEALTH & MEDICINE 141 08 HISTORY 157 09 LIFESTYLE 167 10 PEOPLE & SOCIETY 193 11 SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 223 12 WILDLIFE & NATURAL HISTORY 233 13 FEATURE FILMS 243 14 GENRE INDEX 257 15 ALPHABETICAL INDEX 271 3 01 ADVENTURE & TRAVEL 2 3 ADVENTURE & TRAVEL ADVENTURE & TRAVEL 3 CHEFS, 1 CITY 13 x 30’ Chefs are the new rock stars and we have the hottest on the planet. ANH DOES... 10 x 60’ 3 Chefs, 1 City explores the world’s greatest foodie destinations through the Anh Does is a travel and lifestyle series presented by Vietnamese-born eyes of chefs, because no-one knows a culinary scene better than the Australian author, actor, comedian and artist, Anh Doh. Exploring modern personalities who define it. In each episode three chefs showcase their day life with his own brand of slapstick humour, Doh visits a host of kitchen skills, their restaurants, the culinary scene and their own passion different countries where he meets with the locals to find out what life for food. Get set as Wolfgang Puck, Alvin Leung, Todd English, Michael is really like there. From experiencing the sights and smells of his native Mina, Grant Achatz, Heinz Beck, David Thompson, Dylan Jones, Cristina Vietnam to the eccentricities of Britain, Anh then goes to Brazil to witness Bowerman, Ian Kittichai and more show you around their cities. Enjoy rare the world’s biggest ever party.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Workshop-‐Series
    Introduction to the Workshop-Series Prof. Roland Deines (Co-Director CBET) The dead body is a hot topic. Not only in scholarship, as we will see, but also in the economy and in the media: TV crime dramas frequently provide graphic depic?ons of the dead, showing the naked body aer an autopsy with the incision marks clearly visible along the sternum;1 the “Bodyworlds” exhibi?ons by the infamous “Dr Death,” the anatomist and “inventor of plas?naon” Gunther von Hagens,2 aract a large public audience; the BBC recently aired a series called “The Beauty of Anatomy;”3 the list could go on. The exposure to the dead body seems to be something characteris?c of our ?me, comparable perhaps to the exponen?al increase in depic?ons of the naked body and sexual acts in various media. There remains, however, a marked discrepancy between public exposure to dead bodies in film, television and exhibi?ons and a general reluctance to discuss death and the appropriate treatment of the body with family 1 Tina Weber, Drop Dead Gorgeous: Representa1ons of Corpses in American TV Shows (Images of Death: Studies on the Social Transformaon of Death 6), Frankfurt: Campus, 2011; ead. and S. Moebius, “Die mediale Reprä- sentaon des Todes: Der Tod in den Kulturen der Moderne am Beispiel des Films,” in M. Schroer (ed.), Die Gesellscha> des Films, Konstanz: UVK, 2007, 264-308; D. Gross and J. Grande (eds.), Objekt Leiche: Technisie- rung, Ökonomisierung und Inszenierung toter Körper. Todesbilder: Studien zum gesellschalichen Umgang mit dem Tod 1. Frankfurt: Campus, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Girl Who Smiled Beads : a Story of War and What Comes After / Clemantine Wamariya and Elizabeth Weil
    Copyright © 2018 by Clemantine Wamariya All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Crown, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York. crownpublishing.com CROWN and the Crown colophon are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC. Portions of this work first appeared in Matter (medium.com/matter), as “Everything Is Yours, Everything Is Not Yours,” on June 29, 2015. Grateful acknowledgment is made to Random House, an imprint and division of Penguin Random House LLC, for permission to reprint an excerpt of “Still I Rise” from And Still I Rise: A Book of Poems by Maya Angelou, copyright © 1978 by Maya Angelou. Reprinted by permission of Random House, an imprint and division of Penguin Random House LLC. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Wamariya, Clemantine, author. | Weil, Elizabeth, 1969- author Title: The girl who smiled beads : a story of war and what comes after / Clemantine Wamariya and Elizabeth Weil. Description: First edition. | New York : Crown Publishing, [2018] Identifiers: LCCN 20170458714| ISBN 9780451495327 (hardcover) | ISBN 0451495322 (hardcover) | ISBN 9780451495334 (paperback) | ISBN 0451495330 (paperback) | ISBN 9780451495341 (ebook) | ISBN 0451495349 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Wamariya, Clemantine. | Rwanda--History-- Civil War, 1994--Refugees. | Refugees- -Biography. | LCGFT: Autobiographies. Classification: LCC DT450.437.W36 A3 2018 | DDC 967.57104/31 [B] --dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017045871
    [Show full text]
  • Rights Guide
    Rights Guide For Foreign Rights Inquiries, please contact: Jennifer Bassuk Alexandra Levenberg Director, Rights & Licensing Associate, Rights & Licensing Amazon Publishing 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 17th Floor New York, New York 10019 [email protected] Rights Guide Table of Contents Spring 2013–Fall 2015 Picture Books . 3–28 Fall 2013–Spring 2015 Chapter Books and Middle Grade Novels . 29–31 Spring 2013–Spring 2015 Young Adult . 32–57 Backlist Titles . 58–76 For Media Inquiries, please contact: [email protected] 2 Frontlist Titles Picture Books Spring 2013–Fall 2015 3 The Typewriter Bill Thomson Also available from Bill Thomson: 10/6/2015 From award-winning illustrator Bill Picture Book Thomson comes the third in a masterfully woven wordless picture book series about imagination. His award-winning Chalk viewed imagination through the lens of art, Fossil viewed it through science, and now The Typewriter will show how words pecked out on a typewriter inspire a group of children to imagine a fantastical story. See page 19 for more information Rights Available: All Languages, Audio Also available from J. R. Krause Happy Birthday, Poco Loco! and Maria Chua: J. R. Krause and Maria Chua 8/18/2015 Picture Book Poco is one crazy little mouse—so crazy that his friends call him Poco Loco. He invents all kinds of amazing things that lead him and his friends on unexpected adventures. And with his birthday coming up, Poco is deter- mined that everything will be perfect—will he be able to pull off a celebration to remember? Pep- pered with Spanish words, this vibrant, engaging story is chock-full of fun.
    [Show full text]