Duke University Dissertation Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Duke University Dissertation Template TUPAIID MASTICATORY ANATOMY AND THE APPLICATION OF EXTANT ANALOGS TO RECONSTRUCTING PLESIADAPIFORM JAW ADDUCTORS by Heather L. Kristjanson A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June 2019 © 2019 Heather L. Kristjanson All Rights Reserved i v Abstract The plesiadapiforms, archaic stem primates first appearing in the Paleocene 66-63 Ma), are integral to investigating the ecological context for primate origins emphasizing diet as a key factor. Fossil evidence comprised almost entirely of jaw fragments has led to dental analyses dominating most dietary research. Yet despite a tremendous diversity in jaw morphologies, no analyses have focused on quantifying the functional morphology of non-dental parts of the plesiadapiform masticatory apparatus, resulting in a chronic deficit in the study of mandibular morphology and muscles of mastication. Non-dental parts of the masticatory apparatus refine dental-based dietary inferences. This project aims to reconstruct plesiadapiform muscles of mastication using both a tupaiid (treeshrews: Order Scandentia) and strepsirrhine (lemurs, lorises and galagos: Order Primates) model. These two taxa form an extant phylogenetic bracket around plesiadapiforms and will serve as extant analogs during reconstruction of their masticatory muscles. Jaw adductor muscles of tupaiid treeshrews were dissected and their architecture described. Muscle mass and fiber architecture were measured and used to calculate the physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA). Results indicate that tupaiid jaw adductor muscle mass, fiber length, temporalis muscle PCSA, and masseter muscle PCSA scale positively and allometrically to jaw length, while medial pterygoid PCSA scales isometrically. Diffusible Iodine-based Contrast-enhanced ii MicroCT scans of two tupaiid specimens show promise as an alternative method to traditional dissection. PCSA in tupaiids was found to correlate to mandibular muscle insertion area, which was then combined with strepsirrhine data to infer jaw adductor dimensions in a sample of plesiadapiform primates. Reconstructing PCSA in this sample suggests niche partitioning in insectivorous species, dental convergence in frugivorous species and specialization in folivorous species. From the reconstructed PCSA, bite force was estimated along the tooth row for plesiadapiforms and compared to estimates in treeshrews and strepsirrhines. In all cases, bite force increased distally along the tooth row and was greatest in specialized extant folivores and weakest in insectivorous plesiadapiforms. Incorporating data from a variety of sources including dental, mandibular, muscular, and biomechanical metrics provides a more comprehensive picture of the challenges and opportunities proffered by a unique mandibular morphology than can be painted by looking at dental evidence alone. iii Thesis Committee Members Jonathan Perry, Ph.D. (dissertation advisor) Associate Professor, Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Siobhán Cooke, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Sharlene Santana, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Biology Curator of Mammals, Burke Museum University of Washington Eric Sargis, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Anthropology Curator of Mammals and Vertebrate Paleontology, Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History iv Acknowledgements I thank the American Museum of Natural History and the Staatliches Museum Fur Naturkunde (R. Ziegler) for access to plesiadapiforms in their care. I thank the United States National Museum of Natural History-Smithsonian Institution (D. Lunde), Yale University (G. Aronsen and E. Sargis), and the Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience for access to treeshrew specimens. I thank the Shared Materials Instrumentation Facility at Duke University (D. Boyer, J. Gladman) and the Gignac Lab at Oklahoma State University (P. Gignac) for the use of their facilities. I thank the American Museum of Natural History, American Association of Anatomists, and Society for Vertebrate Paleontology for funding. I thank the members of my committee, Drs. Siobhán Cooke, Sharlene Santana, and Eric Sargis, and Drs. Mary Silcox, Doug Boyer, Paul Gignac, and Chris Kirk for helpful advice. I would also like to thank Arlene Daniel, current and former faculty members Kenneth Rose, David Weishampel, Valerie DeLeon, Chris Ruff, Elizabeth St. Clair, Janine Chalk, and Terry Mitchell, as well as former and current students from the Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution for their friendship, expertise, and advice over the years. A special thank you to my fieldwork companions Heather Ahrens, Stephanie Canington, Tony Harper, Katrina Jones, Kristen Prufrock, Nicky Squyres, and Kaya Zelazny for the good times and memories. v I would especially like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jonathan Perry, for all of his advice and friendship over the years; it was a lot of fun bonding over our shared pop-culture references and love of all things purple. To my family, who supported me on my journey in the pursuit of knowledge, it was your love, encouragement, and stability that made this possible. In particular, I thank my dad for instilling in me the curiosity to embark upon this path and my mom for the perseverance to see it through. These acknowledgements would not be complete without thanking my friend and fellow student, Rachel, for her confidence in me, her support both as a colleague and friend, and always providing an excuse to drink tea. Whether it was a midnight dissection or midnight wedding flower arranging, you were always there for me. Finally, I thank my husband, Steve, for being an invaluable source of encouragement and support; it seems fitting that it was anatomy that brought us together and I am very grateful to always have you by my side. vi Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ xiii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ xv Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 Primate origins and the case for diet .............................................................................. 19 1.2 Introduction to plesiadapiforms ....................................................................................... 22 1.2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 22 1.2.2 Previous dietary research on plesiadapiforms ..................................................... 24 1.3 Relationships between primate morphology and diet ............................................ 27 1.3.1 Categorizing diet ................................................................................................................ 28 1.3.2 Muscles of Mastication ..................................................................................................... 30 1.3.2.1 Applications of iodine staining for reconstructive work ......................... 31 1.3.2 The primate mandible...................................................................................................... 32 1.3.2.1 Corpus ............................................................................................................................ 33 1.3.2.2 Symphysis ..................................................................................................................... 35 1.4 Non-dietary factors influencing primate mandibular morphology ................... 36 1.4.1 Food material properties ................................................................................................ 37 1.4.2 Sexual dimorphism and size ......................................................................................... 38 1.5 Reconstructing diet in the primate fossil record ....................................................... 40 vii 1.5.1 Establishing modern analogs for plesiadapiform by constructing an extant phylogenetic bracket ................................................................................................................... 42 1.5.1.1 Plesiadapiform reconstruction ............................................................................ 44 1.5.2 Introduction to tupaiids .................................................................................................. 45 1.5.2.1 Systematics and ecology ......................................................................................... 45 1.5.2.2 Tupaiid suitability as an extant analog ............................................................ 47 1.6 Goals and hypotheses ............................................................................................................. 49 1.6.1 Goals and Hypotheses: Chapter Two ........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The World at the Time of Messel: Conference Volume
    T. Lehmann & S.F.K. Schaal (eds) The World at the Time of Messel - Conference Volume Time at the The World The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 2011 Frankfurt am Main, 15th - 19th November 2011 ISBN 978-3-929907-86-5 Conference Volume SENCKENBERG Gesellschaft für Naturforschung THOMAS LEHMANN & STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL (eds) The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference Frankfurt am Main, 15th – 19th November 2011 Conference Volume Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung IMPRINT The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Conference Volume Publisher PROF. DR. DR. H.C. VOLKER MOSBRUGGER Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editors DR. THOMAS LEHMANN & DR. STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected]; [email protected] Language editors JOSEPH E.B. HOGAN & DR. KRISTER T. SMITH Layout JULIANE EBERHARDT & ANIKA VOGEL Cover Illustration EVELINE JUNQUEIRA Print Rhein-Main-Geschäftsdrucke, Hofheim-Wallau, Germany Citation LEHMANN, T. & SCHAAL, S.F.K. (eds) (2011). The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates. 22nd International Senckenberg Conference. 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main. Conference Volume. Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main. pp. 203.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemism and Diversity of Small Mammals Along Two Neighboring Bornean Mountains
    Endemism and diversity of small mammals along two neighboring Bornean mountains Miguel Camacho-Sanchez1,2,*, Melissa T.R. Hawkins3,4,5,*, Fred Tuh Yit Yu6, Jesus E. Maldonado3 and Jennifer A. Leonard1 1 Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics Group, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain 2 CiBIO—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal 3 Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA 5 Division of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA 6 Sabah Parks, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Mountains offer replicated units with large biotic and abiotic gradients in a reduced spatial scale. This transforms them into well-suited scenarios to evaluate biogeographic theories. Mountain biogeography is a hot topic of research and many theories have been proposed to describe the changes in biodiversity with elevation. Geometric constraints, which predict the highest diversity to occur in mid-elevations, have been a focal part of this discussion. Despite this, there is no general theory to explain these patterns, probably because of the interaction among different predictors with the local effects of historical factors. We characterize the diversity of small non-volant mammals across the elevational gradient on Mount (Mt.) Kinabalu (4,095 m) and Mt. Tambuyukon (2,579 m), two neighboring mountains in Borneo, Malaysia. We documented a decrease in species richness with elevation which deviates from expectations of the geometric constraints and suggests that spatial Submitted 14 February 2018 Accepted 9 September 2019 factors (e.g., larger diversity in larger areas) are important.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 30:75-105 (1987) Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates FREDERICK S. SZALAY, ALFRED L. ROSENBERGER, AND MARIAN DAGOSTO Department of Anthropolog* Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10021 (F.S.S.); University of Illinois, Urbanq Illinois 61801 (A.L. R.1; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University/ Baltimore, h4D 21218 (M.B.) KEY WORDS Semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, Suborders Strepsirhini and Haplorhini, Semisuborder Anthropoidea, Cranioskeletal morphology, Adapidae, Omomyidae, Grades vs. monophyletic (paraphyletic or holophyletic) taxa ABSTRACT We contrast our approach to a phylogenetic diagnosis of the order Primates, and its various supraspecific taxa, with definitional proce- dures. The order, which we divide into the semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, is clearly diagnosable on the basis of well-corroborated informa- tion from the fossil record. Lists of derived features which we hypothesize to have been fixed in the first representative species of the Primates, Eupri- mates, Strepsirhini, Haplorhini, and Anthropoidea, are presented. Our clas- sification of the order includes both holophyletic and paraphyletic groups, depending on the nature of the available evidence. We discuss in detail the problematic evidence of the basicranium in Paleo- gene primates and present new evidence for the resolution of previously controversial interpretations. We renew and expand our emphasis on postcra- nial analysis of fossil and living primates to show the importance of under- standing their evolutionary morphology and subsequent to this their use for understanding taxon phylogeny. We reject the much advocated %ladograms first, phylogeny next, and scenario third” approach which maintains that biologically founded character analysis, i.e., functional-adaptive analysis and paleontology, is irrelevant to genealogy hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia, Plesiadapiformes) As Reflected on Selected Parts of the Postcranium
    SHAPE MEETS FUNCTION: STRUCTURAL MODELS IN PRIMATOLOGY Edited by Emiliano Bruner Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Primatological Society Torino, Italy, 22-28 August 2004 MORPHOLOGY AND MORPHOMETRICS JASs Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 82 (2004), pp. 103-118 Locomotor adaptations of Plesiadapis tricuspidens and Plesiadapis n. sp. (Mammalia, Plesiadapiformes) as reflected on selected parts of the postcranium Dionisios Youlatos1, Marc Godinot2 1) Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Biology, Department of Zoology, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. email [email protected] 2) Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, UMR 5143, Case Courrier 38, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Paleontologie, 8 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France Summary – Plesiadapis is one of the best-known Plesiadapiformes, a group of Archontan mammals from the Late Paleocene-Early Eocene of Europe and North America that are at the core of debates con- cerning primate origins. So far, the reconstruction of its locomotor behavior has varied from terrestrial bounding to semi-arboreal scansoriality and squirrel-like arboreal walking, bounding and claw climbing. In order to elucidate substrate preferences and positional behavior of this extinct archontan, the present study investigates quantitatively selected postcranial characters of the ulna, radius, femur, and ungual pha- langes of P. tricuspidens and P. n .sp. from three sites (Cernay-les-Reims, Berru, Le Quesnoy) in the Paris Basin, France. These species of Plesiadapis was compared to squirrels of different locomotor habits in terms of selected functional indices that were further explored through a Principal Components Analysis (PCA), and a Discriminant Functions Analysis (DFA). The indices treated the relative olecranon height, form of ulnar shaft, shape and depth of radial head, shape of femoral distal end, shape of femoral trochlea, and dis- tal wedging of ungual phalanx, and placed Plesiadapis well within arboreal quadrupedal, clambering, and claw climbing squirrels.
    [Show full text]
  • SMC 136 Gazin 1958 1 1-112.Pdf
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 136, NUMBER 1 Cftarlesi 3B, anb JKarp "^aux OTalcott 3^es(earcf) Jf unb A REVIEW OF THE MIDDLE AND UPPER EOCENE PRIMATES OF NORTH AMERICA (With 14 Plates) By C. LEWIS GAZIN Curator, Division of Vertebrate Paleontology United States National Museum Smithsonian Institution (Publication 4340) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JULY 7, 1958 THE LORD BALTIMORE PRESS, INC. BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. CONTENTS Page Introduction i Acknowledgments 2 History of investigation 4 Geographic and geologic occurrence 14 Environment I7 Revision of certain lower Eocene primates and description of three new upper Wasatchian genera 24 Classification of middle and upper Eocene forms 30 Systematic revision of middle and upper Eocene primates 31 Notharctidae 31 Comparison of the skulls of Notharctus and Smilodectcs z:^ Omomyidae 47 Anaptomorphidae 7Z Apatemyidae 86 Summary of relationships of North American fossil primates 91 Discussion of platyrrhine relationships 98 References 100 Explanation of plates 108 ILLUSTRATIONS Plates (All plates follow page 112) 1. Notharctus and Smilodectes from the Bridger middle Eocene. 2. Notharctus and Smilodectes from the Bridger middle Eocene. 3. Notharctus and Smilodectcs from the Bridger middle Eocene. 4. Notharctus and Hemiacodon from the Bridger middle Eocene. 5. Notharctus and Smilodectcs from the Bridger middle Eocene. 6. Omomys from the middle and lower Eocene. 7. Omomys from the middle and lower Eocene. 8. Hemiacodon from the Bridger middle Eocene. 9. Washakius from the Bridger middle Eocene. 10. Anaptomorphus and Uintanius from the Bridger middle Eocene. 11. Trogolemur, Uintasorex, and Apatcmys from the Bridger middle Eocene. 12. Apatemys from the Bridger middle Eocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    PALEOCENE PRIMATES OF THE FORT UNION, WITH DIS- CUSSION OF RELATIONSHIPS OF EOCENE PRIMATES. By James Williams Gidley, Assistant Curator, United States National Museum. INTRODUCTION. The first important contribution to the knowledge of Fort Union mammalian life was furnished by Dr. Earl Douglass and was based on a small lot of fragmentary material collected by him in the au- tumn of 1901 from a locality in Sweet Grass County, Montana, about 25 miles northeast of Bigtimber.* The fauna described by Douglass indicated a horizon about equivalent in age to the Torrejon of New Mexico, but the presence of unfamilar forms, suggesting a different faunal phase, was recognized. A few years later (1908 to 1911) this region was much more fully explored for fossil remains by parties of the United States Geological Survey and the United States National Museum. Working under the direction of Dr. T. W. Stanton, Mr. Albert C. Silberling, an ener- getic and successful collector, procured the first specimens in the winter and spring of 1908, continuing operations intermittently through the following years until the early spring of 1911. The present writer visited the field in 1908 and again in 1909, securing a considerable amount of good material. The net result of this com- bined field work is the splendid collection now in the National Museum, consisting of about 1,000 specimens, for the most part upper and lower jaw portions carrying teeth in varying numbers, but including also several characteristic foot and limb bones. Although nearly 10 years have passed since the last of this collec- tion was received, it was not until late in the summer of 1920 that the preparation of the material for study was completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Research Experience
    Rochelle Kelly Curriculum Vitae 472 Life Sciences Building Ph.D. Candidate University of Washington [email protected] Seattle WA, 98195 EDUCATION 2013- 2018 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA Dissertation Title: Diversity, distributions, and ecology of bats among the San Juan Islands. Advisor: Dr. Sharlene Santana 2013 B.S. Conservation & Resource Studies, High Honors, University of California, Berkeley, CA Honors thesis: Influence of landscape heterogeneity on bat activity in vineyards. Advisor: Dr. Erica Bree Rosenblum 2007 A.S. Veterinary Technology, Western Career College, Pleasant Hill, CA RESEARCH EXPERIENCE 2018 Genetic and morphological diversity of Myotis spp. in Washington State. Collected morphometric and genetic data to compare patterns morphological and genetic diversity among two Pacific Northwest Myotis spp. (M. lucifugus and M. yumanensis) across Washington State. Department of Biology and the Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Advisor: Dr. Sharlene Santana. 2013-2018 Diversity, distributions, and ecology of bats among the San Juan Islands. Carried out field and lab work to collect and analyze tissue, guano, & distribution data from bats among the San Juan Islands to study diversity and distribution patterns. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Advisor: Dr. Sharlene Santana. 2014-2018 Comparison of morphological and molecular identification of Washington’s Myotis spp. Designed and managed course project for BIOL/FISH 340, where students carried out morphological and molecular identification of Myotis spp. that were submitted to the Washington Department of Health for Rabies testing. Department of Biology and the Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Advisor: Dr. Sharlene Santana and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodes 149 September 2009 Published by the International Union of Geological Sciences Vol.32, No.3
    Contents Episodes 149 September 2009 Published by the International Union of Geological Sciences Vol.32, No.3 Editorial 150 IUGS: 2008-2009 Status Report by Alberto Riccardi Articles 152 The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene) by F.J. Hilgen, H.A. Abels, S. Iaccarino, W. Krijgsman, I. Raffi, R. Sprovieri, E. Turco and W.J. Zachariasse 167 Using carbon, hydrogen and helium isotopes to unravel the origin of hydrocarbons in the Wujiaweizi area of the Songliao Basin, China by Zhijun Jin, Liuping Zhang, Yang Wang, Yongqiang Cui and Katherine Milla 177 Geoconservation of Springs in Poland by Maria Bascik, Wojciech Chelmicki and Jan Urban 186 Worldwide outlook of geology journals: Challenges in South America by Susana E. Damborenea 194 The 20th International Geological Congress, Mexico (1956) by Luis Felipe Mazadiego Martínez and Octavio Puche Riart English translation by John Stevenson Conference Reports 208 The Third and Final Workshop of IGCP-524: Continent-Island Arc Collisions: How Anomalous is the Macquarie Arc? 210 Pre-congress Meeting of the Fifth Conference of the African Association of Women in Geosciences entitled “Women and Geosciences for Peace”. 212 World Summit on Ancient Microfossils. 214 News from the Geological Society of Africa. Book Reviews 216 The Geology of India. 217 Reservoir Geomechanics. 218 Calendar Cover The Ras il Pellegrin section on Malta. The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Serravallian Stage (Miocene) is now formally defined at the boundary between the more indurated yellowish limestones of the Globigerina Limestone Formation at the base of the section and the softer greyish marls and clays of the Blue Clay Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Genus of Stem Lagomorph (Mammalia: Glires) from the Middle Eocene of the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 57(1-2): 29-42, Kraków, 31 December 2014 Ó Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Pol. Acad. Sci., Kraków doi:10.3409/azc.57_1-2.29 Zoobank Account:urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22E831F0-4830-4649-9740-1BD6171983DD Anewgenusofstemlagomorph(Mammalia:Glires)fromthe MiddleEoceneoftheErlianBasin,NeiMongol,China £ucja FOSTOWICZ-FRELIK andQianLI Received: 15 October 2014. Accepted: 10 December 2014. Available online: 29 December 2014. FOSTOWICZ-FRELIK £., LI Q. 2014. A new genus of stem lagomorph (Mammalia: Glires) from the Middle Eocene of the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China. Acta zool. cracov., 57(1-2): 29-42. Abstract. We report the discovery of Erenlagus anielae, a new genus and species of stem lagomorph from the lower part of the Middle Eocene Irdin Manha Formation at the Huhe- boerhe locality, Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China. The remains consist of isolated teeth; however, the material includes all loci except the incisors and P2. The new lagomorph is characterized by a small size and high degree of unilateral hypsodonty comparable to that of Aktashmys and slightly higher than that observed in the coeval and co-occurring Stre- nulagus. Further, it shows advanced root fusion, which exceeds even that in Gobiolagus. Although phylogenetic relationships of the Eocene lagomorphs from Asia are still not fully resolved, the dental characters of Erenlagus anielae suggest that it is most closely re- lated to Lushilagus danjingensis from the Middle Eocene of Henan, China and Ak- tashmys montealbus from the late Early Eocene of Kyrgyzstan. This stratigraphically well-constrained finding represents one of the lagomorph genera that appeared in the Eo- cene Glires paleobiodiversity reservoir, the Erlian Basin in Nei Mongol.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE E. Christopher Kirk Department of Anthropology Phone: (512) 471-0056 2201 Speedway Stop C3200 Fax: (512) 47
    CURRICULUM VITAE E. Christopher Kirk Department of Anthropology Phone: (512) 471-0056 2201 Speedway Stop C3200 Fax: (512) 471-6535 University of Texas at Austin [email protected] Austin, Texas 78712 PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS 2016-Present University Distinguished Teaching Professor, University of Texas at Austin 2015-Present Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin 2014-Present Research Associate, Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory, Jackson School Museum of Earth History, University of Texas at Austin 2009-2015 Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin 2005-2014 Assistant Research Professor, Texas Memorial Museum, University of Texas at Austin 2003-2009 Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin 2000-2003 Instructor, Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University EDUCATION Ph.D. 2003 Biological Anthropology and Anatomy: Duke University B.A. 1995 Anthropology: University of Texas at Austin PROFESSIONAL AND HONOR SOCIETY MEMBERSHIPS American Association of Physical Anthropology Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Phi Beta Kappa HONORS & AWARDS 2016 Member, Academy of Distinguished Teachers – Recognizes tenured faculty members who have made sustained and significant contributions to education, particularly at the undergraduate level; Nominated by the Department of Anthropology and the College of Liberal Arts 2016 Billy Carr Distinguished Teaching Fellowship – Awarded in recognition of my efforts to include students
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming
    Distribution and Stratigraphip Correlation of Upper:UB_ • Ju Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming U,S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESS IONAL PAPER 1540 Cover. A member of the American Museum of Natural History 1896 expedition enter­ ing the badlands of the Willwood Formation on Dorsey Creek, Wyoming, near what is now U.S. Geological Survey fossil vertebrate locality D1691 (Wardel Reservoir quadran­ gle). View to the southwest. Photograph by Walter Granger, courtesy of the Department of Library Services, American Museum of Natural History, New York, negative no. 35957. DISTRIBUTION AND STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION OF UPPER PALEOCENE AND LOWER EOCENE FOSSIL MAMMAL AND PLANT LOCALITIES OF THE FORT UNION, WILLWOOD, AND TATMAN FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Upper part of the Will wood Formation on East Ridge, Middle Fork of Fifteenmile Creek, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. The Kirwin intrusive complex of the Absaroka Range is in the background. View to the west. Distribution and Stratigraphic Correlation of Upper Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming By Thomas M. Down, Kenneth D. Rose, Elwyn L. Simons, and Scott L. Wing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1540 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remarkable, Yet Not Extraordinary, Human Brain As a Scaled-Up Primate Brain and Its Associated Cost
    The remarkable, yet not extraordinary, human brain as a scaled-up primate brain and its associated cost Suzana Herculano-Houzel1 Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and Instituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia, 04023-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil Edited by Francisco J. Ayala, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 12, 2012 (received for review February 29, 2012) Neuroscientists have become used to a number of “facts” about the The incongruity between our extraordinary cognitive abilities human brain: It has 100 billion neurons and 10- to 50-fold more glial and our not-that-extraordinary brain size has been the major cells; it is the largest-than-expected for its body among primates driving factor behind the idea that the human brain is an outlier, and mammals in general, and therefore the most cognitively able; an exception to the rules that have applied to the evolution of all it consumes an outstanding 20% of the total body energy budget other animals and brains. A largely accepted alternative expla- despite representing only 2% of body mass because of an increased nation for our cognitive superiority over other mammals has been metabolic need of its neurons; and it is endowed with an overde- our extraordinary brain size compared with our body size, that is, veloped cerebral cortex, the largest compared with brain size. our large encephalization quotient (8). Compared
    [Show full text]