“Up to the Gates of Ekron”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Up to the Gates of Ekron” “UP TO THE GATES OF EKRON” Essays on the Archaeology and History of the Eastern Mediterranean in Honor of Seymour Gitin Editor-in-Chief Sidnie White Crawford Editors Amnon Ben-Tor, J.P. Dessel, William G. Dever, Amihai Mazar, and Joseph Aviram Published by THE W.F. ALBRIGHT INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH THE ISRAEL EXPLORATION SOCIETY JERUSALEM 2007 EAST GREEK AND ETRUSCAN POTTERY IN A PHOENiciAN CONTEXT MARÍA EUGENIA AUBET Universidad Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain Introduction In this study, I propose alternative suggestions for The mutual ignorance of students of the Phoenician the identification of the “people behind the pots.” world handling archaeological data at either end of the Mediterranean may at times give rise to con- Greek Mercenaries? clusions that are questionable and in many cases are strained, as well as to contradictions in the his- The recent publication of the results of the excava- torical interpretation of similar archaeological evi- tions at the important Middle Bronze Age site of dence. This is what has occurred in the matter of the Tel Kabri in Galilee has highlighted the presence of presence at Phoenician centers in the Mediterranean an Iron Age IIB–C fortress that was occupied dur- of imported Greek pottery dated to the late seventh ing the seven–sixth centuries BC (Lehmann 2002). and early sixth centuries BC, which has been in- Situated in the southwestern corner of the tell (in terpreted from very different historical perspectives Area E), the fortress occupied a strategic position on that in some cases bear witness to a clear ideologi- the southern frontier of the kingdom of Tyre, 7 km cal bias. There is obviously something lacking in from the coast and to the north of the Plain of Acco. the methodological approach when opinions are so The construction is notable chiefly for its solid wall disparate. of casemates, built using a typically Phoenician In general, these interpretations tend to over- technique, which housed a small garrison of sol- value the importance of the imported ceramics, the diers in the service of the king of Tyre. In Phase E2a presence of which in any given context may derive (ca. 600 BC), the fort was abandoned immediately from many causes and is not always linked to for- after a violent destruction that has been linked to the eign ethnic groups (see Liverani 1986). The “pots- conquest of Tyre by Nebuchadnezzar II in 605–603 and-people” dilemma has always been particularly BC (Pastor Borgoñón 1995; Lehmann 2002). apparent in studies of decorated Greek pottery. The An abundance of Phoenician pottery was re- fascination wielded by luxury Greek pottery in non- covered from the destruction levels of the fortress: Greek contexts has fostered a tendency to associ- storage jars, red-slipped fine ware, and local black- ate material of this type with the presence of Greek on-red and bichrome ware. Outstanding among the people; but this does not occur with less glamorous non-Phoenician pottery is a small assemblage of pottery like Phoenician or Archaic Etruscan wares. Greek ceramics, representing only 2% of all the pot- A well-known instance is that of the Levantine cit- tery found in this level. Apart from an Attic “SOS” ies of Al Mina, Ras el Bassit, and Tell Sukas, for amphora, all the Greek pottery consists of vessels which a Greek origin has long been defended, based from eastern Greece, among which “bird bowls,” on the analysis of imported Greek pottery; the re- Ionian cups, amphorae, and cooking pots predomi- sults, however, have been shown to be partial, de- nate (Niemeier 2002b). The imported material also liberately selective, and sometimes manipulated includes an Etruscan oinochoe of bucchero ware. (see Perreault 1993: 68; Waldbaum 1997: 4). The Tel Kabri assemblage of Greek pottery con- 447 448 MARÍA EugENIA AubET sists of Archaic Greek types that are widespread found in the principal cities of Asiatic Ionia, like throughout the eastern Mediterranean between Miletum, Ephesus, and Samos, is also noteworthy the second half of the seventh and the early sixth (Naso 2000: 175–78). This seems to reflect a clear centuries BC. In terms of archaeological context, integration of Etruscan commercial interests in the parallel nearest to Kabri is that of the fortress the international exchange networks of the period, of Mezad Ḥashavyahu to the north of Ashkelon dominated by the Ionian cities. that was under the sovereignty of the Kingdom of A very similar or almost identical phenomenon Judah, where an assemblage of East Greek pottery can be seen in the western Mediterranean, where has also come to light. Based on the Greek cooking the presence of these imported Ionian wares cannot vessel sherds in the two assemblages, Niemeier has be related to the arrival of Greek mercenaries. interpreted them as evidence of the presence of a small contingent of Greek mercenaries stationed at Greek Colonists? the two forts (2001: 15–16; 2002a: 328–30). The written Assyrian and Greek sources could be seen In the 1980s, an important assemblage of Ionian as support for this hypothesis; they mention Carian pottery was found in the warehouses of the ancient and Ionian mercenaries in the service of the kings Tartessian port city of Huelva. Situated in the en- of Lydia and Egypt in the time of Psammeticus I virons of the Phoenician port of Gadir, this center (Herodotus Histories II: 152–154 [Aguilera 1960]). had from the eighth century BC been the main In the Niemeier’s opinion, Ezekiel, too, could al- point of trans-shipment for silver from the mines lude to Ionian mercenaries in the Kingdom of Tyre, of the hinterland—Riotinto and Aznalcollar—a although the prophet is less explicit on this point source of wealth that had brought huge profits to the (2001: 19–20). Phoenician colonial world and to the native elites of In fact, the chief difference between Kabri and the interior. other Levantine centers that have also yielded East The presence of Ionian potttery from the end of Greek ceramics from the Archaic period, like Al the seventh century BC in the Phoenician colonial Mina, which are used to support the hypothesis of world and its sphere of influence marked a signifi- the Greek mercenaries, lies in the fact that the latter cant change in preferences in terms of the demand have yielded no Greek cooking pots, thus ruling out for Greek merchandise in the markets of the West. the presence of Greeks (Niemeier 2001: 14–15). In Until then, and from the second half of the eighth the case of Al Mina, it would have been trade rather century BC, it had been the extremely rare and spo- than the military element that was responsible for radic imports of Attic pyxides, Proto-Corinthian ko- the presence of these manufactured articles, al- tylai, Attic and Corinthian amphorae, Euboean bird though the conditions under which the excavations skyphoi, Euboean imitations of Proto-Corinthian were carried out in this port city do not in my opin- kotylai, and cups from Thapsos that had predominat- ion allow for confirming or denying the presence of ed in the Phoenician colonies of southern Spain and foreign domestic pottery at the site at the end of the Carthage. The context of these finds would suggest seventh century BC (see Waldbaum 1997: 12). a limited circulation of Greek merchandise forming It is surprising how little interest was shown part of Phoenician colonial trade, rather than Greek in the presence of Etruscan bucchero ware in the trade as such. Indeed, a few luxury Greek ves- analysis of imports at Kabri. Although it is of mini- sels had given rise to Phoenician imitations made mal proportions—only one vessel—the fact that in in western workshops (Briese and Docter 1991). the eastern Mediterranean, Etruscan pottery (cups, Generally, it was a matter of very choice imports, kantharoi, oinochoai, and amphorae, mostly from found in the Phoenician colonies of Gadir-Doña workshops in the south of Etruria) almost always Blanca, Carthage, Sulcis, Cerro del Villar, Toscanos, appears in association with East Greek ceram- Almuñecar, Fonteta, and in their indigenous sphere ics, for example, at Ras el Bassit and Kition (see of influence (Huelva, Carambolo). Naso 2000), warrants attention. In this context, the The new finds from Huelva demonstrate high proportion of Etruscan bucchero ware vessels changed trends in the range of Greek imports in EAST GREEK AND ETRUSCAN POTTERY IN A PHOENiciAN CONTEXT 449 the Phoenician colonies of southern Iberia and a Arganthonios; he ruled Tartessos for eighty restructuring of the international exchange net- years and lived a hundred and twenty. The works around the years 620–600 BC. This change Phoceans so won this man’s friendship that is reflected in the considerable increase in Greek he first entreated them to leave Ionia and ceramics at Huelva, the bay of Gadir, Toscanos, settle in his country where they would; and and Cerro del Villar, representing homogeneous then, when he could not persuade them to assemblages of East Greek pottery, among which that, and learnt from them how the Median amphorae from Samos and from Chios, Ionian A2 power was increasing, he gave them money cups, “bird bowls” from Northern Ionia, and cups to build a wall round their city therewith, for and hydrias from Samos predominate. At Huelva, the circuit of the wall is of many furlongs East Greek imports, together with a few black-fig- and all this is made of great stones well fit- ured Attic pieces, represent 10% of all the pottery ted together. found in this indigenous city, and their importation In another passage, Herodotus relates (Histories IV: ceased abruptly around 540 BC (Fernández Jurado 152): 1984; Niemeyer 1988–90: 283).
Recommended publications
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Assyrian Treaties As a Source for the Historian: Bonds of Friendship, the Vigilant Subject and the Vengeful KingS Treaty
    WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY Sources, Problems, and Approaches Proceedings of an International Conference Held at the University of Helsinki on September 22-25, 2014 Edited by G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger THE NEO-ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT 2019 STATE ARCHIVES OF ASSYRIA STUDIES Published by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki in association with the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Project Director Simo Parpola VOLUME XXX G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger (eds.) WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY SOURCES, PROBLEMS, AND APPROACHES THE NEO- ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT State Archives of Assyria Studies is a series of monographic studies relating to and supplementing the text editions published in the SAA series. Manuscripts are accepted in English, French and German. The responsibility for the contents of the volumes rests entirely with the authors. © 2019 by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki and the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research All Rights Reserved Published with the support of the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Set in Times The Assyrian Royal Seal emblem drawn by Dominique Collon from original Seventh Century B.C. impressions (BM 84672 and 84677) in the British Museum Cover: Assyrian scribes recording spoils of war. Wall painting in the palace of Til-Barsip. After A. Parrot, Nineveh and Babylon (Paris, 1961), fig. 348. Typesetting by G.B. Lanfranchi Cover typography by Teemu Lipasti and Mikko Heikkinen Printed in the USA ISBN-13 978-952-10-9503-0 (Volume 30) ISSN 1235-1032 (SAAS) ISSN 1798-7431 (PFFAR) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. vii Giovanni Battista Lanfranchi, Raija Mattila, Robert Rollinger, Introduction ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Kouros
    THE ORIGINS OF THE KOUROS By REBECCA ANN DUNHAM A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Rebecca Ann Dunham This document is dedicated to my mom. TABLE OF CONTENTS page LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1 DEFINITION OF THE KOUROS TYPE ....................................................................1 Pose...............................................................................................................................2 Size and material...........................................................................................................2 Nudity ...........................................................................................................................3 Body Shape and Treatment of Musculature .................................................................3 Execution ......................................................................................................................4 Function ........................................................................................................................5 Provenances ..................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILISTINES in the BOOKS of KINGS* Seymour Gitin W. F
    PHILISTINES IN THE BOOKS OF KINGS* Seymour Gitin W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research, Jerusalem 1. Introduction The Philistines have long been of interest to students of the Bible. Although extra-biblical texts – including Egyptian, Neo-Assyrian, Neo-Babylonian, and Greek sources – provide a number of important insights into the history of the Philistines, evidence that could address in detail questions relating to their origin, their historical, cultural, religious, and economic development, and their ultimate fate has only come to light in the last half-century as a result of archaeological exca- vations. Most importantly, archaeology has shed new light on the role of the Philistines as one of the chief protagonists in the history of biblical Israel. The Philistines, Philistia, and its cities are mentioned a total of 422 times in the Bible, but only 18 of these references occur in the Book of Kings, and these mention only the Philistines and three of their five capital cities, namely, Ekron, Gath, and Gaza. This indi- cates that in stark contrast to other periods, they played only a minor role during the period covered by the Book of Kings – the period of the United and Divided Monarchies that spanned from the 10th through the 8th c. BCE.1 Even though these 18 references offer only a * I wish to thank Edna Sachar for her careful reading of the text and to acknowl- edge the following credits for the illustrations: Figs. 1–2 from the Collection of the Israel Antiquities Authority/photos © the Israel Museum, Jerusalem; Figs. 3–5, 13 courtesy of the Leon Levy Expedition to Ashkelon; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenician and Greek Ashlar Construction Techniques at Tel Dor, Israel
    Phoenician and Greek Ashlar Construction Techniques at Tel Dor, Israel Ilan Sharon Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No. 267. (Aug., 1987), pp. 21-42. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-097X%28198708%290%3A267%3C21%3APAGACT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2 Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research is currently published by The American Schools of Oriental Research. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/asor.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Philistines Were Among the Sea Peoples, Probably of Aegean Origin, Who First Appeared in the E Mediterranean at the End of the 13Th Century B.C
    The Philistines were among the Sea Peoples, probably of Aegean origin, who first appeared in the E Mediterranean at the end of the 13th century B.C. These peoples were displaced from their original homelands as part of the extensive population movements characteristic of the end of the LB Age. During this period, the Egyptians and the Hittites ruled in the Levant, but both powers were in a general state of decline. The Sea Peoples exploited this power vacuum by invading areas previously subject to Egyptian and Hittite control, launching land and sea attacks on Syria, Palestine, and Egypt, to which various Egyptian sources attest. The various translations of the name Philistine in the different versions of the Bible reveal that even in early times translators and exegetes were unsure of their identity. In the LXX, for example, the name is usually translated as allopsyloi ("strangers"), but it occurs also as phylistieim in the Pentateuch and Joshua. In the Hebrew Bible, the Philistines are called Pelishtim, a term defining them as the inhabitants ofPeleshet, i.e., the coastal plain of S Palestine. Assyrian sources call them both Pilisti and Palastu. The Philistines appear as prst in Egyptian sources. Encountering the descendants of the Philistines on the coast of S Palestine, the historian Herodotus, along with sailors and travelers from the Persian period onward called them palastinoi and their countrypalastium. The use of these names in the works of Josephus, where they are common translations forPhilistines and Philistia and, in some cases, for the entire land of Palestine, indicates the extent to which the names had gained acceptance by Roman times.
    [Show full text]
  • BBFW6301 Ceramic Analysis in Field Archaeology New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Division of Biblical Studies Spring Break 2017
    BBFW6301 Ceramic Analysis in Field Archaeology New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Division of Biblical Studies Spring Break 2017 Dr. Dan Warner : Associate Prof. of Old Testament Hebrew and Archaeology Dr . Eli Yannai: Guest Lecturer from the Israel Antiquities Authority Dr . R. Dennis Cole : Professor of Old Testament Hebrew and Archaeology Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] Mission Statement The mission of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is to equip leaders to fulfill the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries . New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary has five core values. The core value focus for 2016-2017 academic year is Characteristic Excellence . This course supports the five core values of the seminary. 1. Doctrinal Integrity : Knowing that the Bible is the Word of God, we believe it, teach it, proclaim it, and submit to it. This course addresses Doctrinal Integrity specifically by equipping students to understand and gain ability to articulate biblical, theological, and historical truths. 2. Spiritual Vitality : We are a worshiping community emphasizing both personal spirituality and gathering together as a Seminary family for the praise and adoration of God and instruction in His Word. Spiritual Vitality is addressed by challenging students to grow in spiritual and moral integrity through the study of the biblical text and spiritual and ethical practices. 3. Mission Focus : We are not here merely to get an education or to give one. We are here to change the world by fulfilling the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries. This course addresses Mission Focus by helping students understand the biblical foundations for fulfilling the Great Commission and the Great Commandments.
    [Show full text]
  • Judea/Israel Under the Greek Empires." Israel and Empire: a Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism
    "Judea/Israel under the Greek Empires." Israel and Empire: A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism. Perdue, Leo G., and Warren Carter.Baker, Coleman A., eds. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015. 129–216. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 30 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567669797.ch-005>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 30 September 2021, 15:32 UTC. Copyright © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 5 Judea/Israel under the Greek Empires* In 33130 BCE, by military victory, the Macedonian Alexander ended the Persian Empire. He defeated the Persian king Darius at Gaugamela, advanced to a welcoming Babylon, and progressed to Persepolis where he burned Xerxes palace supposedly in retaliation for Persias invasions of Greece some 150 years previously (Diodorus 17.72.1-6). Thus one empire gave way to another by a different name. So began the Greek empires that dominated Judea/Israel for the next two hundred or so years, the focus of this chapter. Is a postcolonial discussion of these empires possible and what might it highlight? Considerable dif�culties stand in the way. One is the weight of conventional analyses and disciplinary practices which have framed the discourse with emphases on the various roles of the great men, the ruling state, military battles, and Greek settlers, and have paid relatively little regard to the dynamics of imperial power from the perspectives of native inhabitants, the impact on peasants and land, and poverty among non-elites, let alone any reciprocal impact between colonizers and colon- ized.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Transit Corridors And
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philisophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Heidi Michelle Fessler 2016 © Copyright by Heidi Michelle Fessler 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant by Heidi Michelle Fessler Doctor of Philisophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Aaron Alexander Burke, Chair Several modern studies and the Assyrians themselves have claimed not only the extreme military measures but also substantial geo-political impact of Assyrian conquest in the southern Levant; however, examples of Assyrian violence and control are actually underrepresented in the archaeological record. The few scholars that have pointed out this dearth of corroborative data have attributed it to an apathetic attitude adopted by Assyria toward the region during both conquest and political control. I argue in this dissertation that the archaeological record reflects Assyrian military strategy rather than indifference. Data from three case studies, Megiddo, Ashdod, and the Western Negev, suggest that the small number of sites with evidence of destruction and even fewer sites with evidence of Assyrian imperial control are a product of a strategy that allowed Assyria to annex the region with less investment than their annals claim. ii Furthermore, Assyria’s network of imperial outposts monitored international highways in a manner that allowed a small local and foreign population to participate in trade and defense opportunities that ultimately benefited the Assyrian core.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Ekron Goddess Revisited Stephen R
    The Mysterious Ekron Goddess Revisited Stephen R. Berlant The Center for Advanced Studies, Philadelphia In 1996 archaeologists found a limestone block bearing an inscription to a goddess (Figure 1) in a temple chamber at a 7th century b.c.e. site that Naveh1 had identified as Tel Miqne–Ekron, or simply Ekron, 35 kilometers southwest of Jerusalem. The Bible states that the site was originally inhabited by the Tribe of Judah, but was later transferred to the Tribe of Dan (Josh. 15:45–46; Judg. 19:43; 1:18). However, archae- ological and textual evidence found at the site and elsewhere in the region revealed that the tell was founded somewhere between the 15th and 14th centuries b.c.e. by indigenous Canaanites, and taken over in the 12th century by the Philistines, after their attacks on Egypt were repelled by Ramses III. In the 10th century, Ekron was subjugated to Israel’s United Monarchy under King David, but between the 10th and 8th centuries, the city came first under Egyp- tian control and later under Assyrian control. By the mid-8th century, Ekron was again under Hebrew control, but later in the same century, it was re-conquered by the Assyrians under Sennacherib, who subsequently converted it into a Neo-Assyrian city-state that the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar destroyed ca. 600 b.c.e.2 According to the excavation leaders Gitin, Dothan, and Naveh, the inscription, written from right to left in a style reminiscent of tenth century b.c.e. Phoenician in- scriptions from Byblos, records the temple’s dedication by Ekron’s ruler Ikausu in a West Semitic dialect resembling Phoenician and Old Byblian, apparently spoken at Ekron and perhaps other Levantine Philistine city states.3 Comprised of some seem- ingly Hebrew letters, some seemingly Phoenician letters, and some letters that seem to have been unique to Ekron, these authors transliterated the inscription as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Bibliography 2007 John Carroll University
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected Faculty Bibliography (2002-2016) Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage 2007 Faculty Bibliography 2007 John Carroll University Follow this and additional works at: http://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib Recommended Citation John Carroll University, "Faculty Bibliography 2007" (2007). Faculty Bibliography (2002-2016). 6. http://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Bibliography (2002-2016) by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY THE JESUIT UNIVERSITY IN CLEVELAND FACULTY BIBLIOGRAPHY - 2007 The following bibliography includes published faculty items from calendar year 2007 and received by the Academic Vice President‟s Office up through January 31, 2011. Entries are coded by bracketed numbers according to the following categories: books [1]; articles/chapters/proceedings [2]; monographs/reports [3]; reviews, review articles, and reference-work articles [4]; creative works [5]; newspapers, newsletters, miscellaneous [6]; journal editorship [7]. *** Aggarwal, Raj, David Schirm, and Xinlei Zhao. “Role Models in Finance: Lessons from Life Cycle Productivity of Prolific Scholars.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 28.1 (2007): 79-100. [2] Allen, Scott J. “Adult Learning Theory & Leadership Development.” Leadership Review 7 (2007): 26-37. [2] —. “A Hunt for the Missing 50 Cents: One Piece of the Leadership Development Puzzle.” Organization Development Journal 26.1 (2008): 19-29. [2] Anthony, Carl D., Cari-Ann M. Hickerson, and M. D. Venesky. “Responses of Juvenile Terrestrial Salamanders to Introduced (Lithobius forficatus) and Native Centipedes (Scolopocryptops sexspinosus).” Journal of Zoology 271 (2007): 54-62.
    [Show full text]