DOCSLIB.ORG

Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812' H-SHEAR Head on Kert, 'Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812' Review published on Wednesday, June 1, 2016 Faye M. Kert. Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812. Johns Hopkins Books on the War of 1812 Series. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015. 224 pp. $55.00 (e-book), ISBN 978-1-4214-1748-6; $55.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-4214-1747-9. Reviewed by David Head (Spring Hill College) Published on H-SHEAR (June, 2016) Commissioned by Robert P. Murray Privateering was ubiquitous in the many Atlantic wars of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and yet because privateers were not as officially documented as naval vessels and have never been as alluring as pirates, they have languished in the literature alongside their better-known brothers in maritime prize making. The lazy definition of a privateer as a licensed pirate persists. I have even heard it at a scholarly maritime history conference. As an antidote, Faye M. Kert, a veteran privateer scholar, offers her brief, broad overview of the War of 1812 privateering conducted from the United States and Britain’s colonies in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The result is a work of painstaking scholarship that advances our understanding of the scope and scale of privateering in the United States’ second major war with Britain. Kert describes privateering as fundamentally a business. Contrary to its wild-and-wooly image, privateering existed within a legal framework, extensive by the nineteenth century, that legitimized and regularized prize taking as a part of a merchant’s investments, a sailor or sea captain’s work, and a port’s industry. Privateering was nevertheless risky, Kert shows. Few vessels brought in the fat prizes of legend and many men lost their lives sailing under a letter of marque. Kert also emphasizes the secondary purpose of privateering: a weapon in a government’s quiver that harnessed private enterprise to public good. Although she maintains that the business side predominated—everyone from the lowliest ship’s boy to the loftiest merchant prince hoped to turn a profit—privateers also wanted to help win the war. Kert covers the many sides of War of 1812 privateers in four quick chapters that discuss such topics as privateer operations, financing, law and legal procedures, recruiting practices, and the experience of sailors. A fifth chapter recounts the cruises of some of the most successful privateers, such as the Yankee of Bristol, Rhode Island; the Saucy Jack of Charleston, South Carolina; the Surprise and Comet of Baltimore, Maryland; and the Liverpool Packet of Liverpool, Nova Scotia, which despite its pedestrian name captured as many as one hundred prizes and brought in as much as four million dollars in prize money, more than any other vessel in Kert’s research. Privateering is at its best when Kert reports the fruit of her prodigious research into the scattered legal, business, and newspaper records she found in the United States and Canada. Her work provides authoritative answers to some of the most basic, but heretofore elusive, questions about the scale of privateering. For example, Kert found that 45 vessels were commissioned in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick while in the United States, 1,172 commissions were issued to 625 vessels, with the Citation: H-Net Reviews. Head on Kert, 'Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812'. H-SHEAR. 06-01-2016. https://networks.h-net.org/node/950/reviews/127842/head-kert-privateering-patriots-and-profits-war-1812 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-SHEAR same ship sometimes carrying multiple commissions during its career as its owners changed. Both figures include privateers proper—that is, privately owned warships whose primary purpose was capturing enemies—and letter of marque traders, vessels whose primary goal was trade but that also carried commissions to capture enemies if the opportunity arose. Her figures revise previous numbers, mostly estimates, and although not radically different from earlier estimates, it is reassuring to have the numbers tied to the actual commissions. Kert does her best to shine light on the question of whether privateering was profitable. Her research suggests that it seldom reaped rich rewards for investors, captains, or sailors. According to Kert, fewer than half of privateers captured even one prize, and among those prizes that were taken, two- thirds never reached port to be condemned by a court and turned into money. Recapture was common and the dangers of the sea pervasive. Ultimately, however, she contends that the records are simply too skimpy to calculate a return on investment with any degree of certainty. The larger impact of privateering on the war is also difficult to discern, according to Kert. The economic damage wrought by privateers seems significant. US privateers captured some 1,900 British vessels and insurance rates rose by 30 percent from 1812 to 1814. Still, as Kert notes, the British merchant marine numbered over 21,000 vessels, meaning privateers captured less than 10 percent of the total number of British merchant ships at sea. Privateers harassed the enemy and boosted morale, Kert writes, but American cruisers were largely bottled up once the British blockade descended in 1813 and merchant ships were well protected once the Royal Navy’s convoy system was in place. The American privateers’ greatest impact came in the war’s first six months and the Canadian privateers were most valuable in that same period when they offered protection the navy was not yet able to provide. Privateers also seemed to have injected much-needed revenue into Atlantic ports whose trade was disrupted by war. British colonial privateers likely brought in some five million dollars to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick; American privateers provided some ten million dollars to their home ports. Privateering kept sailors and dockworkers busy, ships active, and goods flowing. At the same time, it is difficult to know how much revenue would have been generated by regular trade during peace. Governments benefited, too, from privateering, although again how much is an open question. Since privateers were privately owned and operated, governments augmented their naval forces essentially for free, and once the war was over, what to do with the vessels was not the government’s problem. Privateers also generated revenue in the form of court fees and customs duties and in the United States, the Seamen’s Hospital Fund received 2 percent of prize proceeds. And yet Kert contends that the strategic value of privateers was limited. They harassed the enemy and buoyed spirits with their tales of adventure but accomplished little else. Kert has accomplished a great deal in a short space. Her notes, tables, and charts are jewels in themselves, and future scholars owe her a debt of gratitude for doing the hard archival labor and making her results widely available. Two tables, lists of all the Canadian and American privateers she found, are available on the book’s Johns Hopkins University Press site. (My favorite vessel names are: Black Vomit, Thinks-I-to-Myself, Young Teazer, and Young Teazer’s Ghost.) Given Kert’s expertise, however, I found myself wanting to hear her weigh in more often on the role Citation: H-Net Reviews. Head on Kert, 'Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812'. H-SHEAR. 06-01-2016. https://networks.h-net.org/node/950/reviews/127842/head-kert-privateering-patriots-and-profits-war-1812 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-SHEAR of privateering in the larger context of the war itself. Kert discusses some of the trade issues that led to war, and she shows the effect of the British blockade on privateering. I would have liked to hear her interpretation of where, exactly, privateering fit in with developments elsewhere in the war as it unfolded. Maybe not the connection between Andrew Jackson’s Indian fighting and the Black Vomit’s cruises, but certainly privateering must have been connected to naval operations and the decisions of policymakers, and it must have played some role in support or opposition to the war. It seems significant that New Englanders were such active privateers when antiwar sentiment was focused in that region. I would like to know what Kert makes of that pattern. In a similar vein, Kert’s arguments could have been strengthened by placing privateers within the other alternatives available at the time to such people as shipowners and investors. Kert argues that privateering should be seen not as an activity sought in itself, as if merchants were incipient pirates dying to plunder with the protection of a commission, but as an investment that made sense during war given the disruption to trade and the lack of other options. My sense is that is correct. Nevertheless, it would have been ideal if Kert could have shown how a merchant went about investing in a privateer as one part of his other businesses. Finding the records would be a challenge, but surely there is one merchant with sufficient business records to permit a case study analysis. Other questions remain unaddressed. I wonder about the opposition to privateering. How significant was it? What were the terms of debate? Were there regional patterns? I wonder, too, about the outcomes of prize cases. How often did courts find against privateers and fail to condemn a prize? So often that privateers had to be precise and exhaustive in their documentation? Or so rarely that the courts were a rubber stamp? What happened to the men who did not have their prize approved? What happened to the goods? Did privateers ever capture slaves and try to claim them as prizes? If so, what did the courts do? All of this is to say, in the end, that privateering is an enormous topic and many opportunities remain for further research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwrecks on the Upper Wicomico River, Salisbury Maryland Shipwrecks
    The Search for the Lion of Baltimore: An American Privateer from the War of 1812 By David Shaw his is the story of the search for an American T privateer sunk by the British in the Chesapeake Bay in 1814. The time was the War of 1812. United States naval ships were blockaded in port by the British. Most of the naval battles of the war were fought on inland lakes such as Lake George and Lake Champlain in New York State. In large part because of the blockade, the new United States government looked to private enterprise to help out – private enterprise in the form of privateering. Privateers were nautical mercenaries, non-military, ship-borne raiders sanctioned to attack enemy vessels, whether naval or merchant, in the name of the Federal government. Privateering was, of course, not unique to An American schooner escaping from H.M.S. Pylades America or to the War of 1812. As early as the 13th during the War of 1812. From a watercolorin the century, ship commanders were issued formal Macpherson Collection. authorization from their governments, known as Letters of Marque and Reprisal, which allowed and in some destroyed 15 Royal Navy ships and no commercial cases encouraged them to prey on enemy ships. vessels. During the same period, American privateers Privateers were an effective way for a government to seized three naval vessels and an estimated 2,500 British mobilize a naval force without expending much money. merchant vessels. The success of the privateers forced Or, as in the case of the United States in the War of the British to convoy merchant ships, which further 1812, these nautical irregulars supported a navy that was engaged Royal Navy vessels already busy blockading blockaded and ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Collection Resources for Teaching About Ships, Sailing, and Baltimore’S Port Contents Introduction
    The Sail Baltimore Curriculum Collection Resources for Teaching about Ships, Sailing, and Baltimore’s Port Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Module 1 – Chesapeake Bay and Port of Baltimore History ......................................................................... 4 Chesapeake Bay History – Native Americans, John Smith, Colonization .................................................. 4 The Port of Baltimore through History ................................................................................................... 15 The Port of Baltimore Today ................................................................................................................... 24 Environmental Changes and Challenges ................................................................................................. 31 Module 2 – Sailing Ships ............................................................................................................................. 34 Baltimore Clippers and the Pride of Baltimore ....................................................................................... 34 The Science of Sailing .............................................................................................................................. 41 Module 3 – Operation and Navigation of Ships .......................................................................................... 49 Introduction: The Schooner
    [Show full text]
  • Old Marblehead Sea Captains and the Ships in Which They Sailed
    Old Marblehead Sea Captains and the Ships in Which They Sailed Compiled and Published for the Benefit of the MARBLEHEAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY By Benjamin J. LINDSEY, Treasurer 1915 Copyrighted by BENJAMIN J. LINDSEY, 1915 Marblehead, Mass. ABBREVIATIONS S P - Ship' Paper or Pass (see cut; page 23) C P - Clearance Paper (see Cut) page 52 and 98. M V S - Marblehead Vital Statistics G C. - Capt. George Cloutman's Letter Book G B - Glover Broughton INTRODUCTION The information contained in this volume has been obtained by careful and persistent research from widely distributed sources viz: the Marblehead and Salem and Beverly Custom House Records, original books of the Marble- head Marine Insurance Company, covering five thousand policies running from 1800 to 1840, list of Marblehead Soldiers and Sailors in the Revolutionary War (compiled in 1912-13 by the author), old log books, old letter books, old newspapers, list of Privateersmen of 1812 made up by Capt. Glover Broughton in a memorial to the 34th, 35th and 36th Congresses asking for grants of land for services rendered, and from the descendants of the men mentioned. This volume is intended to be a fairly accurate list of the Old Sea Captains of Marblehead, and the vessels in which they sailed, going to and from foreign ports. The list of the names of the men is very nearly complete, but the list of the vessels is not as satisfactory, it being at this late date practically impossible to obtain complete information. Of the five hundred men mentioned, but two are alive at this time, Captain John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Hecht's Twice Burned the War We Commemorate–IX Chasseur
    Monthly Publication of the Fell’s Point Citizens on Patrol 8 December 2012 4HHEE&ELLSS0OIINTERNTERVolume 14 Number 11 Ex-Hecht’s Twice Burned Happenings By Michael Lisicky Services, Carols, Celebration The Rev. John Trautwein will con- Last June 12, a five-alarm fire heavily dam- duct his Annual Christmas Eve Can- aged one of South Broadway’s most prominent dlelight-Carol Service at 7PM in the structures. Initial news reports called the building Visitor Center on Thames St. “This “a vacant warehouse” but most Fell’s Pointers knew is a non-denominational service.” it as the home of the Fresh Foods supermarket. And said the Lutheran pastor, who is also long-time area residents knew it had been Hecht’s the senior Town Crier. He and col- Reliable Stores, or “the Macy’s of Fell’s Point,” a com- league Michael Lisicky will begin their plete four-story community department store. Christmas Morning Walk Through the Streets at 11AM, starting at Broadway Reports stated that a faulty refrigeration unit on and Shakespeare St. As for the cel- the roof caused the June fire. It sat in disarray until ebrations that Main Street has made a a four-alarmer early Nov. 6 destroyed most of the tradition over the last decade, they will building. Nearby residents heard several repeated already have occurred by the time you explosions as it became engulfed in flames. Its might read this ‘Pointer. This year’s seeming destruction came on the heels of a three- calendar is not kind to the newsletter’s alarm blaze around the corner on Fleet St.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Is Going Up, Happenings Plain Seemingly Pushed Back Preservation Society Awarded a Star-Spangled 1812 Grant
    Monthly Publication of the Fell’s Point Citizens on Patrol 13 April 2013 4HHEE&ELLSS0OIINTERNTER Volume 15 Number 4 Flood Insurance Is Going Up, Happenings Plain Seemingly Pushed Back Preservation Society Awarded A Star-Spangled 1812 Grant . By Lew Diuguid The Preservation Society has won a $150,000 Star-Spangled For Fell’s Pointers who buy flood insurance, Banner 200th Anniversary Grant for including those in the federal flood plain who an exhibit and documentary film on must, their premiums almost certainly will go up the War of 1812. It was awarded by on Oct.1 because of a law passed last year. But in a the Maryland War of 1812 Bicenten- seeming paradox, the newly redrawn map of this nial Commission. By Dave L. Christianson vulnerable community’s flood plain actually shows . 42nd House Tour Is May 12 From painting of Comet off Ft. McHenry. it shrinking in comparison to the map that has The 42nd Historic Fell’s Point determined rates for the last 35 years. As a result, House Tour of the Preservation some homeowners now required to purchase the Society will be on Mothers’ Day, The War We Commemorate–XII federally subsidized insurance will have the option Sunday, May 13, 11AM to 5PM. Boyle’s Comet Cuts Swath; of forgoing it--although U.S., state, and city officials It includes the newly restored are unanimous in advising that they not do so. four-bay townhouse on Aliceanna Licensing of the Traitorous Indeed, if they retain a newly optional policy, their St. Tickets are $15 in advance at the Visitor Center, 1724 Thames By Geoffrey M.
    [Show full text]
  • Boyle and Chasseur - 1814 Chasseur, Commanded by William Wade, Was Refitting in New York After a Successful Cruise
    Thomas Boyle Carries On 13 On October 29, Boyle and Comet slipped through the British blockade in heavy weather and set a course for the West Indies. Over the next few months Boyle evaded British patrols, pursued a convoy of 60 ships and captured 10 prizes. On Modern depiction of Comet by January 11, he had his first close Baltimore artist Patrick O’Brien www.PatrickOBrienStudio.com call, engaging Hibernia, which proved to be a 22-gun British Letter of Marque. After a 6-hour running battle, both ships had serious damage, and both captains withdrew from the pursuit. Comet had three men killed and 16 injured, including Boyle. But Comet was back in action just two days later, cutting-out three vessels from the harbor at Virgin Gorda. After refitting in Puerto Rico, Boyle continued to take prizes and outrun every man-of-war he saw. On March 19, 1814, after five months at sea and taking 20 prizes, Comet arrived at Beaufort, North Carolina. After transferring command to his lieutenant, Clement Cathell, Boyle returned to Baltimore. The cruise was not as profitable as Boyle and his partners had hoped: all but 3 of the 20 prizes had been recaptured. British authorities in the West Indies also had intensified the hunt for Comet, and the merchants of St. Thomas had posted a sizable cash reward for her capture. Boyle needed a new area to cruise and a less recognizable ship - one more suitable for a new plan he had in mind. The Weekly Register, March 26, 1814: “The privateers Comet and Chasseur of Baltimore, along with other ships of this port, are doing great business in the West Indies.” Boyle and Chasseur - 1814 Chasseur, commanded by William Wade, was refitting in New York after a successful cruise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise, Fall, and Rise Again of Privateers
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 The Rise, Fall, and Rise Again of Privateers —————— ✦ —————— ALEXaNDER TaBaRROK n August 1812, the Hopewell, a 346-ton ship laden with sugar, molasses, cotton, coffee, and cocoa, set sail from the Dutch colony of Surinam. Her captain was Ipleased because he reckoned that in London the cargo would sell for £40,000— the equivalent of at least several million dollars in today’s economy.1 The Hopewell carried fourteen guns and a crew of twenty-five, and for protection she sailed in a squadron of five other vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Too Fleet for Any Frigate John Bull Had. Baltimore's Privateers and the War
    Editor: Adam J. Youssi Volume 44 Summer 2014 Number 4 Too fleet for any frigate John Bull had.1 Baltimore’s Privateers and the War of 1812 By: Julia Deros Pride of Baltimore II in the Chesapeake Bay (Photograph published with permission courtesy Pride of Baltimore, Inc.) PAGE 2 History Trails Baltimore has always been known for its ties to ports.5 Between 1812 and 1815, Congress issued the water. Its location on the Chesapeake Bay more than 500 letters of marque with 122 of those makes it the most inland deep water port on the east going to the privateers of Baltimore alone.6 coast, which, at times, placed it among the most At the time, Baltimore had long been one of the important trading hubs in the nation. Meanwhile, most important trading ports in the fledgling but anyone from the city will tell you Baltimore’s growing nation, with many merchant vessels seafood, especially its famous crabs smothered in available to convert for wartime. Moreover, many Old Bay seasoning, is among the best. Yet, often of the merchant vessels were already suited for the found sitting in the harbor is another symbol of the warfare for which the nation needed to prepare. city’s complex history with its bay waters - the The key vessels were the Baltimore Clippers, a Pride of Baltimore II. type of schooner that had been regularly employed Launched in 1988 as a memorial to the first by the port for trading and smuggling before the Pride of Baltimore which sank off Puerto Rico in war began.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval War of 1812, Volume 2, Chapter 2
    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume II 1813 Part 4 of 8 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 1992 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 308 ATlANTIC THEATER build and fit out their Ships, is scarcely credible, and I am very apprehensive of the mischief their Cruizers will do to our Trade- Several large Clipper Schooners of from two to three hundred Ton.s, str~)llgly manned and armed have run thro' the Blockade in the Ch~sapeak, In spite ~f every endeavour and of the most vigilant attention of ~ur Ships t~ prevent ~helr Chapter Two getting out, nor can any thing stop these Vessels escaping to Sea In dark NI~h~ and Strong Winds, their Lordships will ?e pleased to observe by Captn. Barne s The Chesapeake Bay Theater: letter which is herewith enclosed, an Instance of Several of these Schooners passing out in a Squadron and outsailing every Ship in Chace. January-December 1813 Two Ships of the Line each to be called 76 Guns are to be finished and launched in March, one at Portsmouth the other at Charlestown near Boston. The Southern Coast about Charlestown is a retreat for the Enemys Pnvateers Given American offensive operations in Canada, the timing of the inevitable and Letters of Marque, I am anxious to Send Small Cruizers thither to destroy and intercept them, the large Class of our fast sailing Brigs are the best adapted attempt of the British to prosecute the war in Chesapeake Bay was a matter of re­ and I should be very happy if their Lordships w(ould] cause some to be Se- sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwrecks on the Upper Wicomico River, Salisbury Maryland Shipwrecks
    The Search for the Lion of Baltimore: An American Privateer from the War of 1812 By David Shaw his is the story of the search for an American T privateer sunk by the British in the Chesapeake Bay in 1814. The time was the War of 1812. United States naval ships were blockaded in port by the British. Most of the naval battles of the war were fought on inland lakes such as Lake George and Lake Champlain in New York State. In large part because of the blockade, the new United States government looked to private enterprise to help out – private enterprise in the form of privateering. Privateers were nautical mercenaries, non-military, ship-borne raiders sanctioned to attack enemy vessels, whether naval or merchant, in the name of the Federal government. Privateering was, of course, not unique to An American schooner escaping from H.M.S. Pylades America or to the War of 1812. As early as the 13th during the War of 1812. From a watercolorin the century, ship commanders were issued formal Macpherson Collection. authorization from their governments, known as Letters of Marque and Reprisal, which allowed and in some destroyed 15 Royal Navy ships and no commercial cases encouraged them to prey on enemy ships. vessels. During the same period, American privateers Privateers were an effective way for a government to seized three naval vessels and an estimated 2,500 British mobilize a naval force without expending much money. merchant vessels. The success of the privateers forced Or, as in the case of the United States in the War of the British to convoy merchant ships, which further 1812, these nautical irregulars supported a navy that was engaged Royal Navy vessels already busy blockading blockaded and ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Ship Passenger Lists, 1538-1825
    K SSLn tar HKi HWK WflH ,'/(, UUKWUP L I B HA FLY OF THE U N IVLR.5ITY Of ILLINOIS OI6.3Z573 L228b 1963 Cop. 2, K. KfllWB HISTORICAL SURVEY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/bibliographyofshOOIanc A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SHIP PASSENGER LISTS, 1538-1825 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SHIP PASSENGER LISTS 1538-1825 Being a Guide to Published Lists of Early Immigrants to North America Compiled by HAROLD LANCOUR THIRD EDITION Revised and Enlarged by RICHARD J. WOLFE WITH A LIST OF PASSENGER ARRIVAL RECORDS IN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES By FRANK E. BRIDGERS New York The New York Public Library 19 6 3 Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number: 63-18141 * * * A revised edition of Passenger Lists of Ships Coming to North America, 1607-1825 (1938) Illustrations by Hal Wilson, Public Relations Staff Printed at The New York Public Library form p717 [x-28-63 2m] 0\(o L*a? Xw . Preface to the Third Edition F INESTIMABLE VALUE to genealogists and historians o would be a record of every emigrant who sailed from Europe to North America in the early years of our nation's history. But no such record exists. Actually, the ravages of fire and time have left to succeeding generations but little of the all too incomplete docu- ments made by the shipping and port authorities in those early days. Those that do remain are now preserved in the archives and libraries of the United States and Europe. In recent years efforts have been made to sort out, transcribe, and print from such old original records, diaries, log books, etc, lists of the early emigrants.
    [Show full text]