DOCSLIB.ORG

Denniston San Vicente Water Supply EIR Volume II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Denniston San Vicente Water Supply EIR Volume II VOLUME II - REVISED EIR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DENNISTON / SAN VICENTE WATER SUPPLY PROJECT COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FEBRUARY 2015 LEAD AGENCY: Coastside County Water District 766 Main Street Half Moon Bay, CA 94109 VOLUME II - REVISED EIR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DENNISTON/SAN VICENTE WATER SUPPLY PROJECT COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FEBRUARY 2015 LEAD AGENCY: Coastside County Water District 766 Main Street Half Moon Bay, CA 94109 PREPARED BY: Analytical Environmental Services 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 447-3479 www.analyticalcorp.com TABLE OF CONTENTS CCWD DENNISTON/SAN VICENTE WATER SUPPLY PROJECT FINAL EIR – VOLUME II 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Environmental Impact Report .....................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need .............................................................................................1-2 1.3 Environmental Review Process ..........................................................................1-2 1.3.1 Lead Agency .........................................................................................1-2 1.3.2 Responsible Agency ..............................................................................1-3 1.3.3 Notice of Preparation and Scoping ........................................................1-3 1.3.4 Draft EIR and Public Review ..................................................................1-3 1.3.5 Final EIR and EIR Certification ..............................................................1-4 1.4 Issues and Concerns Raised During Scoping .....................................................1-4 1.5 Scope of the EIR ................................................................................................1-7 1.6 Terminology Used in the EIR ..............................................................................1-9 1.7 Organization of the Report ...............................................................................1- 10 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Project Location..................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Project Under Review .........................................................................................2-1 2.4 Scoping Issues ...................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Alternatives to the Proposed Project...................................................................2-3 2.6 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................2-3 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Project Components ...........................................................................................3-4 3.2.1 Petition for Extension of Time for Water Right Permit 15882...................3-4 3.2.2 Proposed Facility Improvements .............................................................3-6 3.2.3 Operation and Maintenance Activities .....................................................3-9 3.2.4 Project Objectives .................................................................................3- 10 3.3 Project Background and Need ..........................................................................3- 10 3.3.1 Current CCWD Water Supply ...............................................................3- 10 3.3.2 Existing Water Rights ............................................................................3- 13 3.3.3 Current Diversions from Denniston and San Vicente Creeks ................ 3-14 Analytical Environmental Services i CCWD Denniston/San Vicente Water Supply Project February 2015 Final EIR Table of Contents 3.3.4 Dredging at Denniston Reservoir ..........................................................3- 15 3.3.5 Purpose and Need ................................................................................3- 15 3.3.6 Easements ............................................................................................ 3-16 3.4 Regulatory Requirements, Permits and Approvals ...........................................3- 16 3.5 Implementation Schedule .................................................................................3- 18 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............. 4.0-1 4.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources ....................................................................4.1 -1 4.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.1 -1 4.1.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4.1 -1 4.1.3 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.1 -2 4.1.4 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................4.1 -4 4.2 Air Quality........................................................................................................4.2 -1 4.2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.2 -1 4.2.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4.2 -1 4.2.3 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.2 -2 4.2.4 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................4.2 -5 4.3 Biological Resources .......................................................................................4.3 -1 4.3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.3 -1 4.3.2 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.3 -1 4.3.3 Methodology .....................................................................................4.3 -12 4.3.4 Environmental Setting ......................................................................4.3 -13 4.3.5 Impact Analysis ................................................................................4.3 -38 4.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources ..........................................................4.4 -1 4.4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.4 -1 4.4.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4.4 -1 4.4.3 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.4 -4 4.4.4 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................4.4 -8 4.5 Geology and Soils ...........................................................................................4.5 -1 4.5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.5 -1 4.5.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4 .5-1 4.5.3 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.5 -9 4.5.4 Impact Analysis ................................................................................4.5 -12 4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................4.6 -1 4.6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.6 -1 4.6.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4.6 -1 4.6.3 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.6 -2 4.6.4 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................4.6 -5 Analytical Environmental Services ii CCWD Denniston/San Vicente Water Supply Project February 2015 Final EIR Table of Contents 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................4.7 -1 4.7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.7 -1 4.7.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4.7 -1 4.7.3 Regulatory Setting ..............................................................................4.7 -3 4.7.4 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................4.7 -7 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality ...........................................................................4.8 -1 4.8.1 Introduction ........................................................................................4.8 -1 4.8.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................4.8 -1 4.8.3 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................4.8 -20 4.8.4 Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................................................... 4.8-26 4.9 Noise ...............................................................................................................4.9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rancho Corral De Tierra- Palomares
    Rancho Corral de Tierra- Palomares Biological Report & Study Compilation July, 2001 Peninsula Open Space Trust Rancho Corral de Tierra-Palomares Biological Report Contents I. Overview & Summary Biological Report Introduction 1 Physical Description 2 Landscape History 3 Geographic Location 6 Parcel Description & Topography 7 Geology and Soils 9 Climate 9 Current Biological Status Summary Biological Importance 10 Beyond the Borders 11 Unique Biological Resources Plant Communities 12 Special Status Plants 13 Animal Communities 14 Special Status Animals 15 II. Biological Description of Rancho Corral de Tierra Methodology 16 Unique Biological Communities 19 Special Status Species Key 22 Plants 23 Reptiles 30 Birds 31 Amphibians 32 Invertebrates 33 Mammals 35 Fish 35 Watershed Delineations & Resources 37 Martini creek watershed 38 Daffodil Valley drainage 41 Farallone drainage 42 Montara creek watershed 44 Sunshine Valley drainage 46 San Vicente creek watershed 47 Denniston creek watershed 50 Other watersheds and drainages 53 Alien and Invasive Species 54 List of Identified Biological Reports & Sources 58 Rancho Corral de Tierra-Palomares I. Overview As the morning mist clears along Hwy. 1, residents who commute daily and first-time travelers experience wonder as the breathtaking views are revealed around the last curve and rocky outcropping that begin the descent into Montara from Devil’s Slide. Mountain cliffs meet crashing waves as vistas of sea and mountains whiz by. Most coastside visitors, blissfully unaware of the efforts to preserve such beauty stretching along the Pacific Coast, lack an identification and understanding of this special area and the flora and fauna it supports. To enjoy and appreciate its stunning views are enough without delving into the past and its legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California
    Becker Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Resources South of the Golden Gate, California October 2008 Gordon S. Becker #ENTERFOR%COSYSTEM-ANAGEMENT2ESTORATION Isabelle J. Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Cartography by David A. Asbury Prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy and The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Resources South of the Golden Gate, California The mission of the Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration is to make effective use of scientific information to promote the restoration and sustainable management of ecosystems. The Center is a not-for-profit corporation, and contributions in support of its programs are tax-deductible. Center for Ecosystem Management & Restoration 4179 Piedmont Ave, Suite 325, Oakland, CA 94611 Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 510.420.4565 http://www.cemar.org CEMAR The cover image is a map of the watershed area of streams tributary to the Pacific Ocean south of the Golden Gate, California, by CEMAR. The image above is a 1934 Gazos Creek stream survey report published by the California Division of Fish and Game. Book design by Audrey Kallander. Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Gordon S. Becker Isabelle J. Reining Cartography by David A. Asbury This report should be cited as: Becker, G.S. and I.J. Reining. 2008. Steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) resources south of the Golden Gate, California. Cartography by D.A. Asbury. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration. Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreward pg. 3 Introduction pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 2 Public Draft ISMND
    CITY OF HALF MOON BAY PARKS MASTER PLAN INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OCTOBER 2018 2635 NORTH FIRST STREET, SUITE 149, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134 650-327-0429 | www.migcom.com This page is intentionally blank City of Half Moon Bay Parks Master Plan Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration October 2018 Prepared for: City of Half Moon Bay Planning Division 501 Main Street Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 2635 North 1st Street, Suite 149 San Jose, CA 95134 (650) 327-0429 This page is intentionally blank Page 1 City of Half Moon Bay Park Master Plan Project Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Project: Half Moon Bay Parks Master Plan Lead Agency: City of Half Moon Bay Project Proponent: City of Half Moon Bay Availability of Documents: The Initial Study for this Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for review at: Planning Division 501 Main Street Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 Contact: Scott Phillips, Associate Planner City of Half Moon Bay Planning Division Email: [email protected] (650) 726-8299 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City intends to adopt and implement the City of Half Moon Bay Parks Master Plan (PMP) which identifies priorities for park improvements and development and is needed to provide overall guidance for long-term decision making by City staff. The PMP is intended to ensure that City parks meet the needs of the Half Moon Bay community, and to guide the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) in allocating resources over the next 15 years. The key components of the PMP include planning context, existing facilities assessment, visions and goals, identification of needs, development guidelines and recommendations for improvements to existing parks, and an implementation element, which includes priority projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Midcoast Groundwater Study Phase III, San Mateo County, California
    Midcoast Groundwater Study Phase III, San Mateo County, California Report prepared for: County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department Prepared by: Mark Woyshner Barry Hecht Jason Parke Travis Baggett Balance Hydrologics, Inc. June 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE PHASE III STUDY ...........................................................................3 1.2 COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.....................................................................................................................3 1.3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................................................3 2. MONITORING DATA .........................................................................................................................................6 2.1 RAINFALL STATIONS .................................................................................................................................6 2.2 STREAM GAGING........................................................................................................................................6 2.3 GROUNDWATER MONITORING .................................................................................................................8 2.3.1 Existing groundwater monitoring programs ...........................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Are the Environmental Documents Associated with the Parks Master Plan
    ATTACHMENT 3 Environmental Review Documents for the Parks Master Plan The following are the environmental documents associated with the Parks Master Plan. The environmental documents include the Errata sheet, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program. 1 Community Development Department Parks Master Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Errata Sheet February 5, 2019 Introduction This errata sheet presents, in strike through and underline format, the revisions to the Parks Master Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) text as a result of public and Planning Commission comments. The revisions to the IS/MND reflected in this errata sheet do not affect the adequacy of the environmental analysis contained in the Parks Master Plan IS/MND that was circulated for public review. Because the changes presented below would not result in any new significant impacts or increase in impact significance from what was identified in the IS/MND, recirculation of the Parks Master Plan IS/MND is not required. ERRATA TEXT CHANGES Mitigation Measure AEST-1 appearing in the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration on page 2, in the Initial Study Checklist on page 39 and in the Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) Mitigation Measure AEST-1 (All Existing and Planned Parks): To avoid light and glare impacts from park projects and to protect the coastside dark night skies valued by the Park Master Plan, the City shall prepare a lighting plan for each park project that contains a night lighting element to it. The lighting plan should provide design and illumination requirements of the project and address how the plan reduces any light and glare impacts and protects dark night skies, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
    [Show full text]
  • County of San Mateo the Promise of the Peninsula
    Midcoast Groundwater Study Phase II V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Half Moon Bay V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V VV V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V County of San Mateo The Promise of the Peninsula SAN MATEO COUNTY MIDCOAST GROUNDWATER STUDY, PHASE II SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA January 8, 2007 (Revised October 2008) Copyright 2008 Kleinfelder All Rights Reserved Use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the client for the specific project. 26848/4RPT (SJO8R430)/es TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pilarcitos Lagoon Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study: Final Report
    Wetlands and Water Resources, Inc 818 5th Avenue, Suite 208 San Rafael, California 94901 tel 415.457.0250 fax 415.457.0260 www.swampthing.org Pilarcitos Lagoon Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study: Final Report 11 May 2010 Prepared for: San Mateo County Resource Conservation District 625 Miramontes Street Suite 103, Half Moon Bay, California 94019 www.sanmateorcd.org With: Peter Baye, PhD D.W. Alley and Associates Project No. 1148 Planning Assessment Design Implementation Applied Science Pilarcitos Lagoon Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Final Report – May 11, 2010 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Project Process ................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Terminology ..................................................................................................................... 5 2 Summary of Conceptual Model ........................................................................................... 7 3 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Criterion 1: Benefits
    [Show full text]
  • December 11, 2018 Agenda
    COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 766 MAIN STREET HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Tuesday, December 11, 2018 – 7:00 p.m. AGENDA The Coastside County Water District (CCWD) does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. Upon request, the agenda and agenda packet materials can be provided in a format to accommodate special needs. If you require a copy of the agenda or related materials in an alternative format to accommodate a disability, or if you wish to attend this public meeting and will require special assistance or other special equipment, please call the District at (650) 726-4405 in advance and we will make every reasonable attempt to provide such an accommodation. All public records relating to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection at the CCWD District Office, located at 766 Main Street, Half Moon Bay, CA at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body. This agenda and accompanying materials can be viewed on Coastside County Water District’s website located at: www.coastsidewater.org. The Board of the Coastside County Water District reserves the right to take action on any item included on this agenda. 1) ROLL CALL 2) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3) PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the Board of Directors on issues not listed on the agenda which are within the purview of the Coastside County Water District.
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation of High Landslide Risk Areas As a Result of Land Cover, Slope, and Geology in San Mateo County, California
    Gaia Stucky de Quay 6th December 2012 Delineation of high landslide risk areas as a result of land cover, slope, and geology in San Mateo County, California Introduction Problem Overview This project attempts to delineate the high-risk areas within San Mateo, California, that are most prone to landslides. The principal method used is based on a ranking system built from 3 key features which include the elevation (used to calculate the slope), rock types, and land cover. The result is a raster with a qualitative ranking, which shows concentration of risk in specific areas. The study shows that softer rocks and vegetation cover have an effect on landslides especially where the elevation is lower. Furthermore, as a result of moderate amount of rainfall, high alluvium concentration near rivers, and large (coastal) human population, the hydrographic flow lines will also be used to assess the risk levels within the county. Background San Mateo has a total area of 1919 km2, of which 1,163.1 km2 (or 61%) is land and 756.1 km2 is water (US Census). The county is bound on the west by the Pacific Ocean, and on the east by the San Francisco Bay. Directly towards the north is San Francisco County and City, and to the south is Santa Clara County. It is often referred to as a peninsula. The Bay Area Corridor is strongly juxtaposed to the agricultural parks and preserves, and undeveloped lands within the rural Coastside. Bay-side watercourses drain the eastern part of the county including San Bruno Creek and Colma Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Half Moon Bay 320 C H U R C H S Treet P Roject Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    CITY OF HALF MOON BAY 320 C H U R C H S TREET P ROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: CITY OF HALF MOON BAY 501 MAIN STREET HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019 Prepared by: 1590 DREW AVENUE, SUITE 120 DAVIS, CA 95618 DECEMBER 2011 C I T Y O F HA L F M O ON B AY 320 C H U R C H S TREET P ROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: CITY OF HALF MOON BAY 501 MAIN STREET HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019 Prepared by: PMC 1590 DREW AVENUE, SUITE 120 DAVIS, CA 95618 DECEMBER 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ............................................. 1.0-1 B. Technical Studies .......................................................................................................................... 1.0-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project Location and Setting ..................................................................................................... 2.0-1 B. Project Background and History ................................................................................................ 2.0-1 C. Regulatory Requirements, Permits, and Approvals ............................................................... 2.0-9 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. Background ................................................................................................................................... 3.0-1 B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................................ 3.0-2 C. Determination ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pillar Point Harbor Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment
    Pillar Point Harbor Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment PREPARED FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT MAY 3, 2018 San Mateo County Harbor District May 3, 2018 Document Verification Client San Mateo County Harbor District Project name Pillar Point Harbor SLR Assessment Document title Pillar Point Harbor, Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Study Date May 3, 2018 Project number 9673-03 Document number Revision Date Description Prepared by Reviewed by A Jan. 29, 2018 Internal Review B. Tehranirad M. Jorgensen B Feb. 14, 2018 Internal Review B. Tehranirad B. Porter C May 02, 2018 Client Review B. Tehranirad SMCHD Prepared by: Moffatt & Nichol 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3500 P 925.944.5411 www.moffattnichol.com Creative People, Practical Solutions.® 1 Pillar Point Harbor SLR Assessment May 3, 2018 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to present the findings from our assessment (study) of the vulnerabilities of Pillar Point Harbor (PPH) to the effects of sea level rise (SLR) in accordance with the requirements for Public Trust Lands (Per Assembly Bill AB-691). The figure below shows the study area, which is divided into eight reaches. Figure 1: Study Area Reach Map The vulnerability assessment considers impacts to the shore facilities due to SLR: shoreline retreat and coastal flooding at 4 different scenarios (elevations) of SLR. This work followed the recommendations given by the National Research Council (NRC), California Coastal Commission (CCC), and Ocean Science Trust (OST) to quantify relative SLR values (Table 1). The Our Coast Our Future (OCOF) online platform was used to map SLR scenarios in 0.82 feet (25 cm) increments from 0 to 3.28 feet (100 cm) and are presented at the end of this section (Figures 2 to 8).
    [Show full text]