DOCSLIB.ORG

High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TUESDAY,THE 31ST JANUARY,2012 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 TO 34 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 35 TO 36 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 37 TO 48 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL / 49 TO 62 REGISTRAR (ORGL.) / REGISTRAR (ADMN.) / JOINT REGISTRARS (ORGL.) 31.01.2012 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 31.01.2012 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [NOTE: NO PASSOVER SHALL BE GIVEN IN THE FIRST TEN MATTERS.] FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. LPA 1095/2011 MOHAN PRAKASH GUPTA P CHAKRABORTY CM APPL. 23581-23584/2011 Vs. DDA AND ANR 2. LPA 50/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA KAMAL SAWHNEY CM APPL. 1302-1303/2012 Vs. BRS PANWAR FOR ADMISSION _______________ 3. LPA 517/2011 MOHD SULEMAN AND ORS SANJEEV SAHAY CM APPL. 11026-11028/2011 Vs. DELHI AGRICULTURE MARKETEING BOARD AND ORS 4. LPA 945/2011 BIJENDER SINGH ARATI MAHAJAN SHEDHA Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS 5. W.P.(C) 6949/2011 DEEPAK KHOSLA LUTHRA AND LUTHRA,NEERAJ Vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE MALHOTRA BOARD OF INDIA AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 6. W.P.(C) 7292/2011 NAYA BANS SARV-VYAPAR ASSO ANUSUYA SALWAN CM APPL. 16560/2011 Vs. UNIION OF INDIA AND ORS CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) __________________________ 7. W.P.(C) 3912/2010 THAR DRY PORT GUNJAN KUMAR,MUKESH CM APPL. 7845/2010 Vs. UOI AND ORS ANAND,RAJDEEPA BEHURA 8. W.P.(C) 6543/2010 THAR DRY PORT GUNJAN KUMAR,RAVINDER Vs. UOI AND ORS AGGARWAL,MUKESH ANAND CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) 9. CM APPL. 707/2012 KRISHAN GOPAL SARABJIT SHARMA,SUMEET In W.P.(C) 7130/2011 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PUSHKARNA 10. W.P.(C) 7939/2011 DAMAYANTI V.TAMBAY SANTOSH KUMAR SETHI,AMITESH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS KUMAR AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING 11. LPA 1232/2007 D.D.A. AJAY VERMA,NS VASHISHT,MONIKA Vs. MOHD. SALEEM DECD. THR. GARG,V.K. TANDON LR'S AND ORS. 31.01.2012 2 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 12. LPA 900/2010 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD SAMEER AGRAWAL,SURINDER BIR CM APPL. 22779/2010 Vs. CHANDER SHEKAR 13. W.P.(C) 4527/2010 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO LAKSHMI KUMARAN,SAPNA LTD CHAUHAN,ABHISIHEK Vs. UOI AND ORS SAKET,SUDARSHAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING (END) 14. LPA 495/2009 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF AMIT K. PAUL,AANCHAL DELHI DHINGRA,SHEKHAR Vs. NARENDER H. CHANDWANI DASI,SWASTIK,RAHUL GUPTA,SHYEL TREHAN AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING (CONNECTED MATTERS) 15. FAO(OS) 315/2011 SMT SUSHILA AGARWAL ABHIJAT AND PRINCY CM APPL. 11796/2011 Vs. PARSHOTTAM SARUP AGARWAL PONNAN,TAMALIWAD,CAV,P K RAWAL 16. FAO(OS) 355/2011 TARUN SARUP AGARWAL AND ORS ABHIJAT,P K RAWAL,CAV,T WAD CM APPL. 13816/2011 Vs. PARSHOTTAM SARUP AGARWAL AND ORS 17. FAO(OS) 356/2011 SUSHILA AGARWAL AND ORS ABHIJAT,PAREKH AND CO.,CAV CM APPL. 13821/2011 Vs. PARSHOTTAM SARUP AGARWAL AND ORS 18. FAO(OS) 357/2011 MADHU AGARWAL AND ANR PK RAWAL CM APPL. 13840/2011 Vs. SUSHILA AGARWAL AND ORS AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING (CONNECTED MATTERS) 19. W.P.(C) 8860/2011 EDUCATION PROMOTION SOCIETY S.UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,AMITESH CM APPL. 20026/2011 OF INDIA AND ORS KUMAR Vs. UOI AND ORS 20. W.P.(C) 8906/2011 FEDRATION OF ASSOCIATIONS OF ROMY CHACKO,AMITESH KUMAR CM APPL. 20114/2011 MANAGEMENTS Vs. AICTE AND ANR COURT NO. 2 (DIVISION BENCH-2) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER [Note: No urgent mentioning shall be entertained, except at 10.30 A.M. Urgent mentioning shall be entertained only in respect of matters of Detention and Personal Liberty and matters which ` cannot brook delay till the normal next day of listing. In the absence of any appearance in the Regular Matters, adverse orders will be passed.] AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 1. FAO(OS) 381/2010 ITI LTD DAYAN KRISHNAN,C. Vs. PAR PRESSINGS MUKUND,ASHOK JAIN 2. FAO(OS) 145/2011 ASHISH KUMAR MULLICK SK PRUTHI,DIPESH CHOUDHARY CM APPL. 5595/2011 Vs. PROMILA MULLICK AND ORS 3. W.P.(C) 7954/2011 INBIOS INDIA THROUGH ITS A.B.DIAL AND ASSO CM APPL. 17999/2011 PROPREITOR NARESH KUMAR SARAF Vs. UOI AND ORS 4. W.P.(C) 9001/2011 GIARA DEVI MALA SHARMA Vs. REGISTREAR MULTI STATE CO-OP SOCIETY AND ANR 31.01.2012 3 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) __________________________ 5. FAO(OS) 684/2010 JASWINDER SINGH ARUN KHOSLA CM APPL. 21681/2010 Vs. MRIGENDRA PRITAM VIKRAMSINGH STEINER AND ORS 6. LPA 879/2010 JASWINDER SINGH ARUN KHOSLA,A.S. CM APPL. 22171/2010 Vs. MRIGENDRA PRITAM CHANDHIOK;A.CURIAE VIKRAMSINGH STEINER AND ORS 7. LPA 19/2011 GEETANJALEI SINGH AND ANR ARUN KHOSLA CM APPL. 352/2011 Vs. MRIGENDRA PRITAM VIKRAMSINGH STEINER AND ORS 8. FAO(OS) 139/2011 SARDANA'S ART CENTRE PVT LTD JAGAT NARAIN CM APPL. 5462/2011 Vs. PAYAL INTENTIONAL LTD FOR DIRECTIONS ________________ 9. CM APPL. 3538/2011 D.D.A. KAMLESH K.BHUCHAR,ASHWANI In FAO(OS) 487/2001 Vs. M/S POLO SINGH AND CO. AND KUMAR DHATWALIA,RAJESH LAKHAN (Disposed off case ANR. PAL,SUNITA ANAND 10. FAO(OS) 8/2004 RAM CHANDER THRU L.R'S P.D.GUPTA AND CO.,RL CM APPL. 17307/2011 Vs. LAL CHAND (DECD) THR LR'S KOHLI,MS. VARSHA KIRPLANI,MR. C M OBEROI,JS MANN,DINESH GARG 11. FAO(OS) 403/2011 GURMEET SINGH JM KALIA Vs. HARDEV SINGH AND ORS 12. FAO(OS) 430/2011 RAJ KUMAR GANDHI PRATEEK CHATURVEDI Vs. ASHOK MITTAL AND ORS 13. W.P.(C) 6263/2011 KNR CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED GEORGE THOMAS CM APPL. 12604/2011 Vs. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA COURT NO.3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL THE FOLLOWING MATTERS SHALL BE TAKEN UP ON 03.02.2012 FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. W.P.(CRL) 1617/2011 SABINA NAZ SEEMA SHARMA PH Vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR. AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 2. FAO(OS) 459/2011 GTL LTD AND ORS RISHI CM APPL. 17625/2011 Vs. IFCI LTD AND ANR AGGARWALA,P.S.BINDRA,CAV PH 31.01.2012 4 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) COURT NO.3 (DIVISION BENCH-3) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN FOR ADMISSION 1. LPA 850/2011 MAYUR AUTO AGENCY PURBALI BORA CM APPL. 19092-19093/2011 Vs. RAMESH SINGH MANRAL 2. W.P.(C) 7238/2011 GOPAL G. D. BHANDARI,NEERAJ ATTRI CM APPL. 16455/2011 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 3. W.P.(C) 184/2007 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC MR.RAJIV CLAS K.GARG,P.GAUTAM,KAMAL MEHTA Vs. UOI AND ORS. 4. W.P.(C) 4427/2008 DR. B.N. RAY ARUNAV PATNAIK,MANINDER CM APPL. 8539/2008 Vs. RAMJAS COLLEGE AND ORS ACHARYA,AMIT BANSAL,SK LUTHRA,DHANANJAY BHASKAR,KRISHAN MAHAJAN 5. W.P.(C) 6317/2010 UOI VSR KRISHNA,RAJESH S CM APPL. 12525/2010 Vs. OP MEENA AND ORS CHAUHAN,S.K.TIWARI 6. W.P.(C) 1317/2011 UOI MANEESHA DHIR,SUMANT BHARDWAJ CM APPL. 2800/2011 Vs. PN PANDEY AND ANR 7. W.P.(C) 6485/2011 D S S S B ZUBEDA ABEGUM,TANUJA RAWAT CM APPL. 13053/2011 Vs. VIKAS KUMAR 8. W.P.(C) 7896/2011 HARISH CHAND SHARMA M.K.BHARDWAJ Vs. KVS AND ORS 9. W.P.(C) 8124/2011 UOI AND ORS D.S.MAHENDRU,TUSHAR R. CM APPL. 18278/2011 Vs. SWAPAN KUMAR DAS MOHANTY,CAV,SANJAY KR DAS 10. W.P.(C) 8417/2011 S.K.MATHUR RAVI SIKRI CM APPL. 19027/2011 Vs. THE PRESIDENT SECRETARIAT REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY AND ANR CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) 11. W.P.(C) 3819/2010 NISHA SETHI SUDAN PETIONER IN PERSON CM APPL. 1102-1103/2011 Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 12. W.P.(C) 4252/2010 GULSHAN KUMAR SACHDEVA PETITIONER IN PERSON,GULSHAN CM APPL. 8434/2010 Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND KUMAR SACHDEVA CM APPL. 1101/2011 ORS 13. W.P.(C) 4754/2010 PRAMOD KUMAR AND ORS PETITIONER IN PERSON CM APPL. 9412/2010 Vs. GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS 14. W.P.(C) 5052/2010 PRABHA RANI AND ANR PETITIONER IN PERSON,BK CM APPL. 9957/2010 Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND BHARTI OTHERS 15. W.P.(C) 2968/2011 MONIKA YADAV VISHWA RANJAN KUMAR Vs. GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS 16. W.P.(C) 2969/2011 BRAJNANDAN LOHIA VISHWA RANJAN KUMAR Vs. GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS 17. W.P.(C) 5297/2011 SAPNA SINHA AND ORS AJAY LAROIA CM APPL. 10744/2011 Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 31.01.2012 5 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING 18. W.P.(C) 5769/2011 DEVENDRA PAL SINGH PRAKASH GAUTAM,R.N.SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING (END) 19. W.P.(C) 2705/2010 DELHI JAL BOARD SUMEET PUSHKARNA,SAVITA Vs. DELHI JAL MAL KARAMCHARI AGGARWAL SANGH AND ORS 20. W.P.(C) 473/2011 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE NARESH KAUSHIK,ALOK BHACHAWAT CM APPL. 972/2011 COMMISSION Vs. CAPTAIN SOLANKI alias ASHWIN BHAWAR LAL SIKANKI AND ANR COURT NO.4 (DIVISION BENCH-4) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA Page 1 of 6 PETITIONER: A
    http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 PETITIONER: A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT: THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/03/1969 BENCH: HIDAYATULLAH, M. (CJ) BENCH: HIDAYATULLAH, M. (CJ) SHAH, J.C. RAMASWAMI, V. MITTER, G.K. GROVER, A.N. CITATION: 1970 AIR 422 1970 SCR (1) 115 1969 SCC (1) 839 CITATOR INFO : RF 1973 SC 827 (1,15,22) RF 1979 SC 193 (69) RF 1986 SC 3 (224) D 1987 SC 663 (1) ACT: Constitution of India, Art. 16(3)-Requirement as to residence in a part of a State-If valid. Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957, s. 3 Application to Telengana Area-Validity. Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rule, 1959, r. 3-Validity. HEADNOTE: The Parliament enacted the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 in pursuance of cl. (3) of Art. 16 of the Constitution of India making special provision for requirement as to residence in public employment. Section 3 of the Act gave the power to make rules in respect of certain classes of employment in certain areas, and accord- ingly the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rules were made prescribing the requirement , as to residence prior to appointment to certain posts, within the Telengana area of the State. The petitioners who were non-domicile persons appointed to the posts reserved for the domiciles of Telengana under the rules, were by an order relieved from their posts and employed in the other 'region of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Criminal
    1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.286 OF 2020 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.)NO.1041 OF 2020) SANJEEV KAPOOR ... APPELLANT VERSUS CHANDANA KAPOOR & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 05.11.2019 in CRM-M-4663 of 2019 filed by the appellant for setting aside the order dated 05.01.2019 passed by the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad. The High Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the appellant. 2. Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding this appeal are: The appellant was married to respondent No.1 on 04.11.1998. On 17.08.199 a daughter was born and on 2 18.07.2005 a son was born out of their wedlock. An application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by respondent No.1 on 09.07.2013 against her husband claiming maintenance for respondent No.1 as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3, minor daughter and son. On 14.10.2013 the appellant filed a petition for divorce against respondent No.1. On the reconciliation efforts made by the Family Court parties settled the matter amicably on the terms and conditions recorded separately in the Court. As per the settlement the appellant was to pay Rs.25,000/- per month towards the maintenance of the respondents with effect from July, 2015 upto April, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajasthan State Judicial Academy 2020 0 AIR(SC) 1064; 20
    11/10/2020 SANJEEV KAPOOR VS CHANDANA KAPOOR This product is Licensed to : Rajasthan State Judicial Academy Jodhpur; Rajasthan State Judicial Academy 2020 0 AIR(SC) 1064; 2020 1 ALD(Cri)(SC) 730; 2020 2 CTC 740; 2020 2 KHC 345; 2020 2 PLJR(SC) 19; 2020 2 Supreme 611; 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 180; SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ASHOK BHUSHAN, R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ. SANJEEV KAPOOR – APPELLANT VERSUS CHANDANA KAPOOR & ORS. – RESPONDENTS CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.286 OF 2020 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.)NO.1041 OF 2020) Decided On : 19-02-2020 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 125, 127 and 362 – Restoration of order of maintenance – Section 125 Cr.P.C. is a social justice legislation which order for maintenance for wives, children and parents – Maintenance of wives, children and parents is a continuous obligation enforced – Court after passing judgment or final order in proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. does not become functus officio – Order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. can be cancelled or altered – With regard to order passed under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C., Magistrate may have to exercise jurisdiction from time to time – Magistrate does not become functus officio after passing order under Section 125 Cr.P.C., as and when occasion arises Magistrate exercises jurisdiction from time to time – By Section 125(5) Cr.P.C., Magistrate is expressly empowered to cancel an order passed under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. on fulfilment of certain conditions – Embargo as contained in Section 362 is clearly relaxed in proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hikmat Ali Khan
    Hikmat Ali Khan Vs Ishwar Prasad Arya and Others Civil Appeal No. 4240 of 1986 (Sujata V. Manohar, S. C. Agarwal JJ) 28.01.1997 JUDGMENT S. C. AGRAWAL J. 1. Ishwar Prasad Arya, Respondent 1, was registered as an advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and was practicing at Budaun. An incident took place on 18-5-1971 during lunch interval at about 1.55 p.m. in which Respondents 1 assaulted his opponent Radhey Shyam in the courtroom of Munsif/Magistrate, Bisauli at Budaun with a knife. A pistol shot is also said to have been fired by him at the time of the incident. After investigation he was prosecuted for offences under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The 1st Temporary Civil and Sessions Judge, by his judgment dated 3-7-1972, convicted him of the said offence and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence under Section 307 IPC and for a period of nine months for offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act. The conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 307 IPC were maintained by the High Court by its judgment dated 10- 9-1975 in Criminal Appeal No. 1873 of 1972 but he was given the benefit of doubt regarding offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act and the conviction and sentence for the said offence were set aside. Before he could be arrested to undergo the punishment of rigorous imprisonment for three years for offence under Section 307 IPC, a copy of letter No.
    [Show full text]
  • Books on and by Shri Subhas Chandra Bose
    Books on and by Shri Subhas Chandra Bose (Birth Anniversary on 23 January) (English Books) Sl. Title Author Publisher and Address Year of Books No. Publicati displayed on (#) 1. The Mission of Life Subhas Chandra Bose Thacker, Spink, Calcutta 1933 # 2. Subhash Bose and his Ideas Jagat S. Bright Indian Printing Works, Lahore 1946 # (Year added in Library 3. Netaji Speaks to the Nation Subhas Chandra Bose The Hero Publications, Lahore 1946 # (1928-1945) : A Symposium of Important Speeches and Writings of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose 4. Netaji Speaks: Being an S. Subuhey Padma Publications, Bombay 1946 # account of the Life and Achievements of Netaji 5. Important Speeches and Jagat S. Bright Indian Printing Works, Lahore 1947 Writings of Subhas Bose: Being a Collection of Most Significant Speeches, Writings and Letters of Subhas Bose from 1927 to 1945 6. The Hero of Hindustan Anthony Elenjimittam Orient Book Co., Calcutta 1947 # 7. Unto Him a Witness; The Story S.A. Aiyar Thacker, Bombay 1951 of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose in East Asia 8. Netaji Mystery Revealed S.M. Goswami The Author, Calcutta 1954 # 9. Netaji: A Realist and a Amita Ghosh The Author, Calcutta 1954 # Visionary 10. Verdict from Formosa: Gallant Harin Shah Atma Ram, Delhi 1956 # End of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose 11. Crossroads: Being the Works of Subhas Chandra Bose Asia Publishing House, Bombay 1962 # Subhas Chandra Bose, 1938- 1940 12. Selected speeches of Subhas India. Ministry of Publications Division, Ministry of 1962 # Chandra Bose Information and Information and Broadcasting, Broadcasting New Delhi 13. Netaji in Germany: A Little N.G.
    [Show full text]
  • LLM Syllabus Revised
    ANDHRA UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS AND SYLLABUS RELATING TO LL.M. DEGREE COURSE (TWO YEAR) SEMESTER PATTERN: (effective from the Academic Year 2013‐2014) • Admission: Candidates admitted into 2 year LL.M. course should have; i. Passed the Bachelor of Law Degree examination of this University or an examination of any other university recognized as equivalent thereto. ii. Qualified in the LL.M. Entrance Test conducted in the year for which the candidate seeks admission. • For the award of LL.M. Degree: A candidate shall be required to have i) received instruction and training for the prescribed course of study as full-time student for two academic years, and ii) qualified all the examinations prescribed for the award of the two Year LL.M. Degree. • Duration: LL M Course has to be pursued in four semesters stretching over two academic years. Each academic year comprises of two Semesters. Each semester will be of the duration of 16 weeks. • Medium of Instruction will be in English language • Attendance: In order to be eligible to take the examination in any subject, candidate is required to put in 75% of attendance in each subject which includes lectures, tutorials and practical training. If a student for any exceptional reason fails to attend 75% of the classes held in any subject, he/she may be condoned for the shortage of attendance if the student concerned attended at least 66% of the classes held in the subject concerned subject to the payment of the fine prescribed from time to time by the University. • Course Structure & Content: LL.M Course is subject to UGC norms prescribed from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA LIST of SENIOR ADVOCATES DESIGNATED by SUPREME COURT (As on 29.03.2019)
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF SENIOR ADVOCATES DESIGNATED BY SUPREME COURT (as on 29.03.2019) S.No. Name Address Date of Remarks designation as Senior Advocate 1 Mr. Ramachandra Martand 89, Shahjahan Road, New 28-3-1966 Retd Judge Bombay H/C Hajarnavis Delhi. 2 Mr. Hari Ramchandra Gokhle Rocky Hill Flats, N. Dabholkar 23-7-1966 Advocate Road, Bombay-6 3 Mr. G. R. Rajagopaul C-53, South Extn. Part-1, New 03-10-1966 Advocate Delhi 4 Dr. V. A. Sayed Muhammad Address not available 07-11-1966 Adv. General 5 Mr. N. D. Khar Khanis 122, Golf Links, N.D. 07-10-1967 Advocate 6 Mr. P. Govinda Menon 2, Hastings Road, New Delhi 06-03-1968 Advocate 7 Dr. Haji N. A. Noor P.O. Box 24, MOGADISCIO 02-1-1969 Advocate Mohammed 8 Mr. Moinul Hague Chaudhury Dr. S. K. Bhuniya Road, 12-12-1969 Advocate Gauhati-I, Assam 9 Mr. B. K. P. Sinha 206, Vithalbhai Patel House, 16-3-1970 Advocate Rafi Marg, N. Delhi. 10 Mr. P. Ramachandra Reddy Srinivas, Hardikar Bagh, 19-8-1970 Adv. Genl Himatat Nagar, Hyderabad 11 Mr. Brijbans Kishore “The River Side” 10 Ram 02-4-1970 Advocate Kishore Marg, Delhi-6 12 Mr. B. V. Subrahmanyam 106, Golf Links, New Delhi 27-4-1970 Adv. General 13 Mr. Jaisukh Lal Hathi 11, Ashoka Road,New Delhi 10-9-1970 Advocate * Names of those Sr. Advocates have been deleted whose death has been intimated to the Registry. Concerned Bar Associations/Sr. Advocates are requested to intimate their present Contact No.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA State of Uttarakhand Vs. Umakant Joshi
    (2012) INDSC 0260 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA State of Uttarakhand Vs. Umakant Joshi C.A.No.3984 of 2012 (G.S. Singhvi and Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya JJ.) 28.05.2012 JUDGEMENT G. S. SINGHVI, J. 1. Whether the Uttarakhand High Court could ordain promotion of respondent No.1 Umakant Joshi to the post of General Manager with effect from 16.11.1989, i.e., prior to formation of the State of Uttaranchal (now known as the State of Uttarakhand) with the direction that he shall be considered for promotion to the higher posts with effect from the dates persons junior to him were promoted is the question which arises for consideration in these appeals, one of which has been filed by the State of Uttarakhand and the Director of Industries, Dehradun and the other two have been filed by Sudhir Chandra Nautiyal (hereinafter described as, Appellant No.1) and Surendra Singh Rawat (hereinafter described as, Appellant No.2) respectively against order dated 4.6.2010 passed by the Division Bench of that High Court in Writ Petition No.324 of 2008. 2. The service profile of Appellant No.1: 2.1 On being selected by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (for short, the Commission), appellant No.1 was appointed to Class-I post in the Industries Department of the Government of Uttar Pradesh with effect from 7.2.1994. 2.2 After formation of the State of Uttaranchal, in terms of Section 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (for short, the Act), the Central Government issued order dated 20.12.2000 under Section 73 thereof and Law Information Center 1 SpotLaw (2012) INDSC 0260 tentatively allotted appellant No.1 along with large number of other officers/employees of the State of Uttar Pradesh including respondent No.1 to the new State of Uttaranchal.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Judgment
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.286 OF 2020 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.)NO.1041 OF 2020) SANJEEV KAPOOR ... APPELLANT VERSUS CHANDANA KAPOOR & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 05.11.2019 in CRM-M-4663 of 2019 filed by the appellant for setting aside the order dated 05.01.2019 passed by the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad. The High Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the appellant. 2. Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding this appeal are: The appellant was married to respondent No.1 on 04.11.1998. On 17.08.199 a daughter was born and on WWW.LIVELAW.IN 2 18.07.2005 a son was born out of their wedlock. An application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by respondent No.1 on 09.07.2013 against her husband claiming maintenance for respondent No.1 as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3, minor daughter and son. On 14.10.2013 the appellant filed a petition for divorce against respondent No.1. On the reconciliation efforts made by the Family Court parties settled the matter amicably on the terms and conditions recorded separately in the Court. As per the settlement the appellant was to pay Rs.25,000/- per month towards the maintenance of the respondents with effect from July, 2015 upto April, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • LLM (Gr-3) Business Law 2017-18
    GUJARAT UNIVERSITY SYLLABI OF LL.M. PROGRAMME Group C : Business Law WITH CREDIT BASED SYSTEM Effective from the academic year 2017-18 LL.M. (Business Law) LL.M. Group C : Business Law Semester – I 1. LAW 401 Legal Theories 2. LAW 402 Indian Constitutional Law: The New Challenges 3. LAW 403 Public International Law 4. LAW404 EBL Law of Industrial and Intellectual Property Paper–I 5. LAW 405EBL Legal Regulation of Economic Enterprise Paper – I 6. LAW406 EBL Law of Export Import Regulation Semester – I : LAW 401 Legal Theories 4 Credits 1. Analytical Legal Positivism 1. 1 Analytical School 1.1.1 Jermy Bentham 1.1.2 John Austin 2. The Pure Theory 2.1 Hans Kelsen 2.1.1 The Basic Norm 2.1.2 Implication of Pure Theory 2.1.3 Contribution of Kelsen 3. Sociological School 3.1 The Social Origin of Laws & Legal Institution 3.2 Impact of Laws on Society 3.3 The Task of Law in Society 3.3.1 Roscoe Pound 3.3.2 Social Engineering 4. American Realism 4.1 Justice Holmes 4.2 Carl. N. Llewellyn 5. Natural Law 5. 1 The Greek Period 5.2 The Roman Period 5.3 The Medieval Period 5.4 Revival of Natural Law Theories References : 1. Bodenheimer, Jurisprudence - The Philosophy and Method of Law (1996) Universal, Delhi 2. Fitzgerald, (ed.) Salmond on Jurisprudence (1999) Tripathi, Bombay. 3. W. Friedmann, Legal Theory (1999) Universal, New Delhi. 4. Paton G. W., Jurisprudence (1972) Oxford, ELBS. 5. Dias, Jurisprudence (1994 First Indian re-print), Adithya Books, New Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH O.A No. 3420/2017 New Delhi, This the 8Th Day of January, 2019 Hon'ble Sh. V
    CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH O.A No. 3420/2017 New Delhi, this the 8th day of January, 2019 Hon’ble Sh. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) Hon’ble Ms. Aradhana Johri, Member (A) 1. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, S/o. Shri Om Prakash Sharma, PGT (Hindi), Aged about 49 years, GBSSS No. 2(1413019) Rohini, Avantika, Sec-1, New Delhi-85. 2. Rohtas Kumar Goel, S/o. Shri H. C. Goel, Aged about 55 years, PGT (Commerce), S. V(1411005) Kailash Enclave, New Delhi-78. 3. Devendra Datt S/o. Shri Raghunath Prasad Sharma Aged about 47 years, PGT, Commerce, Mangolpuri Block-R, SBV-1412011, New Delhi-81. 4. Jatinder Kumar Arora S/o. Shri Kewal Krishan Aged about 59 years, PGT, Geography, Mangolpuri Block-R, SBV-1412011, New Delhi-81. 2 O.A 3420/2017 5. Devendra Gopal Gupta S/o. Bal Krishna Gupta, Aged about 57 years, PGT (Maths), Govt. co-ed Sarvodaya Vidyalaya (1413004), Rohini Sector-6, New Delhi-85. 6. Vijender Mohan Vashist S/o. Shri Hari Ram Sharma, Aged about 57 years, PGT (History), GBSSS No. 2(1413019) Rohini, Avantika, Sec-1, New Delhi-85. 7. Rajesh Kumar S/o. Shri Sardar Singh, Aged about 43 years, PGT (English), GBSSS (1821006) No. 1 Sagarpur, New Delhi-46. 8. Hitendra Kumar Virani S/o. Shri Dilip Kumar Virani Aged about 36 years, PGT (Commerce), RRPV (1309124), Block-BT Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-49. 9. Sumit Kumar Gupta, S/o. Sudhir Chandra Gupta, Aged about 34 years, PGT (Commerce), SBV(1207009), Burari, New Delhi-84. 10. Yogesh Kumar Singh, S/o.
    [Show full text]
  • Subhash Chandra Bose
    SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE Structure 24.0 Objectives 24.1 Introduction 24 1.1 Early L~fe , 24 1.2 HISActiv~t~es 24.2 The Basic Concepts of Subhash's Political Philosophy 24 2.1 Idea of Sistory 24.3 Militant Nationalism and Patriotism 24.4 Bose's View on Nation Building 24.5 Swadeshi and Nationalism 24.6 The Concept of Freedom 24.7 Bose's Conception of Socialism 24.8 Spcial Change 24.9 The Technique of National and Social Revolution - Guerrilla Warfare 24.10 Bose and Fascism 24.11 LetUsSumUp 24.12 Key Words 24.13 Some Useful Books 24.14 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 24.0 OBJECTIVES 1 After going through this unit you should be able to: understand the role of Bose in nation building; explain the relationship of Bose's active political life and his philosophy; understand his theory of socialism; differentiate his views on socialism from other schools of socialism and explain his views on nationalism. 24.1 INTRODUCTION Subhash Chandra Bose was not a political philosopher in the traditional sense. He was deeply involved in national politics of colonial India and concentrated all his energy in overthrowing British rule from the country. The achievement of freedom was thus his prime goal and hence his political ideas mainly revolved around national freedom which would pave way far a bright future for India. There is spontaneity in his palitical thinking which cannot be separated from his hectic political life. 24.1.1 Early Life He was born on January 23, 1887 at Cuttack.
    [Show full text]