DOCSLIB.ORG

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 R E P O R T Committee on National Security House of Representatives H.R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 R E P O R T Committee on National Security House of Representatives H.R 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±132 "! NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 1119 together with ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JUNE 16, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 1 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±132 "! NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 1119 together with ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JUNE 16, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 41±401 WASHINGTON : 1997 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FLOYD D. SPENCE, South Carolina, Chairman BOB STUMP, Arizona RONALD V. DELLUMS, California DUNCAN HUNTER, California IKE SKELTON, Missouri JOHN R. KASICH, Ohio NORMAN SISISKY, Virginia HERBERT H. BATEMAN, Virginia JOHN M. SPRATT, JR., South Carolina JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas CURT WELDON, Pennsylvania OWEN PICKETT, Virginia JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado LANE EVANS, Illinois JIM SAXTON, New Jersey GENE TAYLOR, Mississippi STEVE BUYER, Indiana NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii TILLIE K. FOWLER, Florida MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD, Guam JAMES TALENT, Missouri JANE HARMAN, California TERRY EVERETT, Alabama PAUL MCHALE, Pennsylvania ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island HOWARD ``BUCK'' MCKEON, California ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois RON LEWIS, Kentucky SILVESTRE REYES, Texas J.C. WATTS, JR., Oklahoma TOM ALLEN, Maine MAC THORNBERRY, Texas VIC SNYDER, Arkansas JOHN N. HOSTETTLER, Indiana JIM TURNER, Texas SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia F. ALLEN BOYD, JR., Florida VAN HILLEARY, Tennessee ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida LORETTA SANCHEZ, California WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina JAMES H. MALONEY, Connecticut LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina SONNY BONO, California CIRO D. RODRIGUEZ, Texas JIM RYUN, Kansas MICHAEL PAPPAS, New Jersey BOB RILEY, Alabama JIM GIBBONS, Nevada ANDREW K. ELLIS, Staff Director (II) C O N T E N T S Page Explanation of the Committee Amendment .......................................................... 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 Relationship of Authorization to Appropriations .................................................. 2 Summary of Authorization in the Bill ................................................................... 2 Summary Table of Authorizations ...................................................................... 2 Rationale for the Committee Bill ........................................................................... 10 Readiness .............................................................................................................. 13 Quality of Life ...................................................................................................... 14 Modernization and Innovation ............................................................................ 15 Defense Reform .................................................................................................... 16 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 17 Hearings ................................................................................................................... 18 DIVISION AÐDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION .................... 19 TITLE IÐPROCUREMENT ................................................................................... 19 OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 19 Aircraft Procurement, Army ............................................................................ 22 Overview ........................................................................................................ 22 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 25 Missile Procurement, Army ............................................................................. 27 Overview ........................................................................................................ 27 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 30 Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army ............................................. 31 Overview ........................................................................................................ 31 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 34 Ammunition Procurement, Army .................................................................... 36 Overview ........................................................................................................ 36 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 40 Other Procurement, Army ............................................................................... 41 Overview ........................................................................................................ 41 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 50 Aircraft Procurement, Navy ............................................................................ 57 Overview ........................................................................................................ 57 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 61 Weapons Procurement, Navy ........................................................................... 66 Overview ........................................................................................................ 66 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 70 Ammunition Procurement, Navy/Marine Corps ............................................ 71 Overview ........................................................................................................ 71 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 74 Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy ................................................................ 74 Overview ........................................................................................................ 74 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 77 Other Procurement, Navy ................................................................................ 81 Overview ........................................................................................................ 81 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 91 Procurement, Marine Corps ............................................................................. 95 Overview ........................................................................................................ 95 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 100 Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ...................................................................... 101 Overview ........................................................................................................ 101 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 106 Ammunition Procurement, Air Force .............................................................. 110 Overview ........................................................................................................ 110 Missile Procurement, Air Force ....................................................................... 113 (III) IV Page Overview ........................................................................................................ 113 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 116 Other Procurement, Air Force ......................................................................... 117 Overview ........................................................................................................ 117 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 123 Procurement, Defense-Wide ............................................................................. 124 Overview ........................................................................................................ 124 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................. 129 National Guard and Reserve Equipment ....................................................... 130 Overview ........................................................................................................ 130 Items of Special Interest .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Honorable Paul Mchale, Assistant Secretary Of
    Statement by Honorable Paul McHale, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense Before the 108th Congress Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities Committee on Armed Services United States House of Representatives March 4, 2004 Introduction Chairman Saxton, Congressman Meehan, distinguished members of this Subcommittee: Thank you for inviting me back to address the critical subject of our nation’s security. I appreciate the opportunity to return today to update you on our progress. When I appeared before this Subcommittee a year ago, new Department of Defense (DoD) organizational structures for homeland defense were still under development. With a continuing sense of urgency and focus, DoD has implemented substantial improvements in homeland defense capabilities over the past year, increasing the safety of the nation. At the same time, there is no reason for complacency. We fully recognize that significant challenges lie ahead. The focus of DoD’s efforts to combat terrorism is on bringing the fight to the terrorists abroad through the prosecution of the global war on terrorism. Thus, our first line of defense is abroad -- to confront the enemy where he lives, trains, plans, and recruits, as we are doing today in Afghanistan and Iraq. Since my last appearance, the Global War on Terror has achieved many more successes. U.S. forces toppled Saddam Hussein’s vicious regime in Iraq, freeing its innocent population from the grip of tyranny. We have captured or killed nearly two-thirds of al-Qaeda’s known senior operatives. We have disrupted terrorist cells throughout the world, likely preventing planned attacks and disrupting the planning of others.
    [Show full text]
  • 105Th Congress 245
    PENNSYLVANIA 105th Congress 245 PENNSYLVANIA (Population 1995, 12,072,000) SENATORS ARLEN SPECTER, Republican, of Philadelphia, PA; born in Wichita, KS, February 12, 1930; graduated, Russell High School, Russell, KS, 1947; University of Pennsylvania, 1951, B.A., international relations, Phi Beta Kappa; Yale Law School, LL.B., 1956; board of editors, Law Journal; served in U.S. Air Force, 1951±53, attaining rank of first lieutenant; member, law firm of Dechert, Price and Rhoads before and after serving two terms as district attorney of Philadelphia, 1966±74; married the former Joan Levy, who was elected to the city council of Philadelphia in 1979; two sons: Shanin and Stephen; served as assistant counsel to the War- ren Commission, 1964; served on Pennsylvania's State Planning Board, The White House Con- ference on Youth, The National Commission on Criminal Justice, and the Peace Corps National Advisory Council; elected to the U.S. Senate, November 4, 1980, for the six-year term begin- ning January 5, 1981; committees: Veterans' Affairs, chair; Appropriations; chair, Judiciary; Governmental Affairs; subcommittees: Agriculture; Rural Development, and Related Agencies; Defense; Foreign Operations; chair, Labor, Health and Human Services; ranking member, Trans- portation; Antitrust, Business Rights, and Competition; Immigration; Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information. Office Listings http://www.senate.gov/∼specter [email protected] 530 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510±3802 ............................... 224±4254 Administrative Assistant.ÐCraig Snyder. FAX: 228±1229 Legislative Director.ÐDan Renberg. Office Manager.ÐJill Schugardt. Press Secretary.ÐJon Ullyot. Suite 9400, 600 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 ................................................ (215) 597±7200 Federal Building, Suite 2017, Liberty Avenue/Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 .
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Honorable Paul Mchale Assistant Secretary of Defense For
    Statement by Honorable Paul McHale Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense Before the 109th Congress Committee on Armed Services United States House of Representatives May 24, 2006 INTRODUCTION Chairman Hunter, Ranking Member Skelton, distinguished members of this Committee: Thank you for inviting me here to address National Guard support to border security. As noted by the President in his address to the Nation last week: “The United States must secure its borders. This is a basic responsibility of a sovereign nation. It is also an urgent requirement of our national security. Our objective is straightforward: The border should be open to trade and lawful immigration, and shut to illegal immigrants, as well as criminals, drug dealers, and terrorists.” Under Section 202 of Title 6, U.S. Code, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is responsible for “[s]ecuring the borders, territorial waters, ports, terminals, waterways, and air, land, and sea transportation systems of the United States” and “[p]reventing the entry of terrorists and the instruments of terrorism into the United States.” The Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) role in the execution of these responsibilities is to provide support to DHS, when directed by the President or when requested by the Secretary of DHS and approved by the Secretary of Defense. During his address last week, the President announced several initiatives to increase the security at our border, including an increase in the number of Border Patrol personnel and the application of advanced technologies at the border. These steps are critical--but they will take time to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Immiiel ● MIL-HDBK-757(AR) 15 April 1994
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com ImmiiEl ● MIL-HDBK-757(AR) 15 April 1994 MILITARY HANDBOOK FUZES .. @ AMSC N/A FSC 13GP DISTRIBUTION STATEMEIXIL% Approved for public re[easq distribution is unlimi[ed Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MIL-HDBK-757(AR) FOREWORD 1. This military handtmok is approved for use by all Activities and Agencies of lhc Department of the Army and is available for use by all Deparunents and Agencies of lhc Department of Defense. 2, Beneficial comments (recommendations. additions, and deletions) and any pertinent data tit may be of use in improving Ibis document should be addressed m Commander, US Army Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center, A7TN: SMCAR-BAC-S, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5020. by using the self-addressed Standar&ation D&ument improve- ment Proposal (DD Form 1426) appearing at the end of his document or by letter. 3. This handbook wzs developed under the auspices of tic US AmY Materiel Command’s Engineering Design Handbook Program, wKlch is under the direction of the US AnnY Industrial Engineering Activity. Research Triangle fnstitute (RTf) was the prime contractor for tie preparation of this handbook, which was prepared under Contract No. DAAA09-86-D-0Q09, Advanced Technology and Research Corporation was a subcontractor to RTf for tie preparation of this handbook. The princi- pal investigator was Mr. William C. Pickier. The development of lhk handbook was guided by a technical working group, which was chaired by Dr. Frederick R. Tepper of tie US &my Annmnem Research, Development, md Engineering Center. I I ii Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com PART ONE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF FTJZES l-l I.2 1-3 I.4 I-5 1-6 m Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MIL-HDBK-757(AR) I-6.2 DESCRIPTION OF A REPRESENTATIVE PYROTECHNIC TIME FUZE .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mterrogatory No. 3
    i I- BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELjECTlON COMMISSION In the Matter of ) Witness Subpoena to ) m 3774 The National Right to) Work Committee ) SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO SUBPOENA The National Right to Work Committee (WRTWC), hereby submits this Supplemental Response to the Subpoena ?o Produce Documents/Order to Submit Written Answers served upcln “WC in the above-referenced MUR, following the June 10,1997, decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Misc. Action No. 97-0160, ordering NRWC to respond to Interrogatory No. 3 and Document Request No. 3, as modified by the Court. INTRODUCTORY COAKMENTS Intemgatory No. 3 and Document Request No. 3 relate to activities from more than four years ago. NRTWC has experienced changes in personnel over those years, and documents may no longer exist, if they ever existed. Nonetheless, “WC, with the assistance of counsel and staff, has conducted a diligent search for documents and facts, and responds on the basis of information so gathered. The Court limited the scope of Interrogatory No. 3 and Document Request No. 3 to the 1992 senatorial candidates, and the Commission, by its attorneys in discussions with “WC counsel, has further limited the scope to the 1992 general election senatorial candidates. Thus, NRTWC’s search has focused on the 1992 general election senatorial candidates. Also, the Commission and NRTWC, in briefing and in discussions between counsel, have agreed that NRTWC may redact documents to delete supporter-identitjing information from documents to be produced, and NRTWC is doing so. MTERROGATORY NO. 3 NRlwC did not engage in, or finance, in whole or in pa, “any activities relating to federal elections in October-December 1992 .
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
    Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pat Toomey (R-Pa)
    LEGISLATOR US Senator PAT TOOMEY (R-PA) IN OFFICE CONTACT Up for re-election in 2016 Email Contact Form LEADERSHIP POSITION http://www.toomey.senate. gov/?p=contact Senate Republican Steering Committee Web toomey.senate.gov http://toomey.senate.gov 1st Term Elected in 2010 Twitter @sentoomey http://twitter.com/ SENIORITY RANK sentoomey 63 Out of 100 Facebook View on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/ senatortoomey DC Office 248 Russell Senate Office Building BGOV BIOGRAPHY By Jim Myers for Bloomberg News Pat Toomey’s performance has been generally to the liking of the small government groups that helped him first get elected although some episodes have raised the hackles of his traditional supporters. Those include his willingness to consider some increased government revenues when he was a member of the so-called supercommittee in 2011 and his partnership with West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin in calling for expanded background checks for prospective gun- buyers in 2013. Toomey was elected to the Senate in 2010 on a small-government, lower taxes platform that was cheered by groups such as the Senate Conservatives Fund, Freedom Works, Club for Growth and Tea Party activists, all of which gave him their endorsements. He headed the Club for Growth, an advocacy and fundraising group that favors limited government and low taxes, for four years before he came to the Senate. He’s often been described as a “conservative firebrand,” based on his Club for Growth presidency and his actions during three terms in the House. Toomey has amassed a lifetime rating of well above 90 percent from the American Conservative Union and the Club for Growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Union of South Africa
    1900-2000 Wheeled 1900 Vehicle, Reconnaissance, Carriage, Motor Gun, Fighting Vehicles of the Davidson-Duryea Mod 1900. United States of America 1899 Veh, Recce, Carr, Motor Gun, Davidson-Duryea. 1909 Carriage, Anti-Aircraft. Destroyer, Balloon, Davidson-Cadillac. 1909 Carr, Wpns. Carriage, Motor, Gun, 3-lb, McClean. Above: the three-wheel Davidson carriage with Colt machine gun. Remarks: The basic vehicle was made by the Rubber and Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Company of Peoria, Illinois, under a patent to Charles Duryea. The basic vehicle weighed approximately 1,000 pounds (454 kgs) and had a 6 horsepower 3-cylinder gasoline engine. Cooling was by a liquid radiator. The two rear wheels each measured 36 inches (914 mm) with wooden spokes, metal rims and pneumatic tires while the front wheel was Above: McClean 3-lb auto-cannon on Packard 3-ton truck. 30 inches (762 mm) in diameter. Power was transmitted to Remarks: Circa 1909-1910. Samuel McClean (aka the rear wheels through a chain drive with three different MacLean) mounted his 3-pounder automatic cannon on a sprocket ratios. Armed with a Colt .30 caliber machine Packard 3-ton truck and demonstrated it to US Army and gun, a crew of four could be carried. As delivered the Department of Defense representatives. While the truck vehicle cost approximately $1,500. was mobile enough for the time, the cannon was far too complicated and none were ordered by the US. Mr. 1900 Vehicle, Reconnaissance, Davidson Auto Battery McClean later sold the rights to his design, which lead to 4x2 (Steam). the development of the Lewis light machine gun.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Artillery
    № 4999 МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Южный федеральный университет» Учебный военный центр Отдел иностранных языков и психологической работы УТВЕРЖДАЮ Начальник учебного военного центра при ЮФУ полковник В.Шибанов «____»_________20 УЧЕБНОЕ ПОСОБИЕ US ARTILLERY Таганрог 2013 Туркот Ю.В. US artillery. Практический курс военного перевода. Английский язык. (Первый иностранный язык). Выпуск 1. Учебное пособие. Таганрог: Изд-во ЮФУ 2013. - 132 с. Пособие предназначено для обучения военному переводу курсантов по специальности «Лингвистическое обеспечение военной деятельности». Оно имеет целью развитие навыков устного и письменного перевода. Данное пособие состоит из 7 уроков, которые включают в себя профессионально ориентированные материалы, теоретический комментарий, лексико-грамматические упражнения, коммуникативные упражнения, упражнения на устный последовательный перевод, упражнения на зрительно-письменный перевод, упражнения на зрительно-устный перевод. При составлении пособия автор опирался на боевые уставы армии США, оригинальные американские тексты, опубликованные в открытой иностранной печати и сети Интернет. В ряде случаев тексты адаптировались. Тематика текстов соответствует учебной программе и расширяет представление курсантов в области материальной части ствольной и реактивной полевой артиллерии армий стран НАТО, устройства их боеприпасов, организации частей и подразделений артиллерии армии США, а также
    [Show full text]
  • On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Projectiles, Part 1: General Considerations
    On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Projectiles, Part 1: General Considerations JOHN W.C. ROBINSON, FREDRIK BEREFELT FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-funded agency under the Ministry of Defence. The core activities are research, method and technology development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 per- sonnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOI Sweden’s largest research institute. FOI gives its customers access to leading-edge expertise in a large number of fi elds such as security policy studies, defence and security related analyses, the assessment of various types of threat, systems for control and management of crises, protection against and management of hazardous substances, IT security and the potential offered by new sensors. FOI Defence Research Agency Phone: +46 8 555 030 00 www.foi.se Defence & Security, Systems and Technology Fax: +46 8 555 031 00 FOI-R--3291--SE Technical report Defence & Security,Systems and Technology SE-164 90 Stockholm ISSN 1650-1942 October 2011 John W.C. Robinson, Fredrik Berefelt On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Projectiles, Part 1: General Considerations Titel Om Styrning av Artilleriprojektiler, Del 1: Generella Overv¨ aganden¨ Title On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Pro- jectiles, Part 1: General Considerations Rapportnummer / Report no FOI-R--3291--SE Rapporttyp / Report type Technical report / Teknisk rapport Manad˚ / Month October Utgivningsar˚ / Year 2011 Antal sidor / Pages 29 ISSN ISSN-1650-1942 Kund / Customer Swedish Armed Forces Projektnummer / Project no E20675 Godkand¨ av / Approved by Maria Sjoblom¨ Head, Aeronautics and Systems Integration FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency Defence & Security, Systems and Technology SE-164 90 STOCKHOLM 2 FOI-R--3291--SE Abstract The problem of adding guidance, navigation and control capabiltities to spin- ning artillery projectiles is discussed from a fairly general perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence Acronyms and Abbreviations
    Acronym Long Title 1ACC No. 1 Air Control Centre 1SL First Sea Lord 200D Second OOD 200W Second 00W 2C Second Customer 2C (CL) Second Customer (Core Leadership) 2C (PM) Second Customer (Pivotal Management) 2CMG Customer 2 Management Group 2IC Second in Command 2Lt Second Lieutenant 2nd PUS Second Permanent Under Secretary of State 2SL Second Sea Lord 2SL/CNH Second Sea Lord Commander in Chief Naval Home Command 3GL Third Generation Language 3IC Third in Command 3PL Third Party Logistics 3PN Third Party Nationals 4C Co‐operation Co‐ordination Communication Control 4GL Fourth Generation Language A&A Alteration & Addition A&A Approval and Authorisation A&AEW Avionics And Air Electronic Warfare A&E Assurance and Evaluations A&ER Ammunition and Explosives Regulations A&F Assessment and Feedback A&RP Activity & Resource Planning A&SD Arms and Service Director A/AS Advanced/Advanced Supplementary A/D conv Analogue/ Digital Conversion A/G Air‐to‐Ground A/G/A Air Ground Air A/R As Required A/S Anti‐Submarine A/S or AS Anti Submarine A/WST Avionic/Weapons, Systems Trainer A3*G Acquisition 3‐Star Group A3I Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative A3P Advanced Avionics Architectures and Packaging AA Acceptance Authority AA Active Adjunct AA Administering Authority AA Administrative Assistant AA Air Adviser AA Air Attache AA Air‐to‐Air AA Alternative Assumption AA Anti‐Aircraft AA Application Administrator AA Area Administrator AA Australian Army AAA Anti‐Aircraft Artillery AAA Automatic Anti‐Aircraft AAAD Airborne Anti‐Armour Defence Acronym
    [Show full text]