arXiv:math/9204232v1 [math.CV] 1 Apr 1992 onie hslmt u neett h eue ae nti contex this In case. reduced the to interest arise: our problems limits This coincide. ipeeape hwta h agn ler of algebra tangent the that show examples simple D where fvco ed n( on fields vector of ete then We ler fdrvtoso h algebra the of derivations of algebra fgrso nltcvco ed n( on fields vector analytic of germs of min space, ambient Various same inspiration. the of treats source which valuable [O], there. a Omori apparent as of us served paper case, The special HM2]. on [HM1, variety. functions see the of where, to tangent local fields isomorp the vector to extent, of algebra up certain Lie variety a the the to one completely replace, consequence may determines algebra a Lie one algebra As their Lie at note. looking the by present varieties that the of singularities of studying theme of way the Lie is certain This to associated fields. varieties integral as considered be equally u osbyrdcbecmlxsaegr.W soit to associate We germ. space complex reducible possibly but hnstemmeso h ahmtc eatetfrterh their for Department Mathematics the of members the thanks oue2,Nme ,Arl19,Pgs276-279 Pages 1992, April 2, Number 26, Volume SOCIETY THE MATHEMATICAL OF AMERICAN BULLETIN IN APPEARED twl ecle the called be will It . osdragerm a appe Consider will Details observations. these of account brief a give shall We fu analytic complex of sets zero as defined varieties, analytic Local hswr a oedrn ii ftescn uhra h Un the at author second the of A visit form, a revised during in done and, was 1991 16, work April This editors the by Received 1991 NLTCVREISVRU NERLVARIETIES INTEGRAL VERSUS VARIETIES ANALYTIC nprl i ler hoei em.Adi ssonta th that shown is it And variety. al the of tangent terms. type all theoretic analytic of the algebra set determines Lie The purely correspondence: in this of properties Abstract. naayi emcnb soitd the associated, be can germ analytic an the fields, vector I ahmtc ujc Classification Subject Mathematics X O ⊂ FLEAGBA FVCO FIELDS VECTOR OF ALGEBRAS LIE OF n X eascaet n emo naayi ait i ler o algebra Lie a variety analytic an of germ any to associate We steielo ucin aihn on vanishing functions of ideal the is ⊂ C ( X agn algebra tangent C ewgHue n edM Gerd and Hauser Herwig n n , facmlxaayi ait meddi oesmooth some in embedded variety analytic complex a of , )tnetto tangent 0) ) nti oe emo ait hl lasma reduced mean always shall variety of germ note, this In 0). agn algebra tangent D X = { D ovrey oayLeagbao etrfields vector of algebra Lie any to Conversely, . O rmr 31,1B5 76,3B0 72,58A30. 57R25, 32B10, 17B65, 14B05, 13B10, Primary . ∈ n C D X n fgrso nltcfntos( functions analytic of germs of D , 1 od olet so do To . , of nerlvariety integral ) eidentify We 0). ( X I X ncase In . ) ⊂ X I X n fisreduction its of and

c uller } ¨ ospitality 92Aeia ahmtclSociety Mathematical American 1992 h ae investigates paper The . X , gs 8 1991 28, ugust 2307/2$.0+$2 e page per $.25 + $1.00 0273-0979/92 D X hsi uagbaof subalgebra a is This . ersi characterized is gebras D eoeteLealgebra Lie the denote sanneue germ, nonreduced a is X vriyo nsrc.He Innsbruck. of iversity ihDer with agn algebra tangent e h i algebra Lie the lerso vector of algebras da r already are ideas h ait by variety the ban new a obtains tangent f ttrsout turns It . cin,can nctions, ,tomain two t, C im Thus hism. O n n oi na in topic X , h Lie the , 0) red relse- ar → may D C X . 2 HERWIG HAUSER AND GERD MULLER¨

• Characterize all Lie subalgebras A ⊂ D that are of the form A = DX for a suitable X. • Find out to what extent the abstract Lie algebra DX determines the variety X.

1. Tangent algebras were characterized by Lie algebra properties In order to discuss the first problem let us fix some notation. A subalgebra A of a Lie algebra B will be called balanced (in B) if A contains no ideal 6=0 of B but an element a 6= 0 such that

[a,B] ⊂ A and [[a,B],B] ⊂ A.

A visible subalgebra of B is a subalgebra A that admits a chain of subalgebras

A = Am ⊂ Am−1 ⊂···⊂ A0 = B such that Ak is maximal balanced in Ak−1 for k =1,...,m. In case m = 1, i.e., if A is a maximal balanced subalgebra of B, A is called maximal visible. Note that these notions are of a purely Lie algebra theoretic nature. X Cn D D For a finite family = {X1,...,Xp} of germs Xi ⊂ ( , 0) let X = Ti Xi be the Lie algebra of vector fields tangent to all Xi (the Xi may be contained in each other). Our first result may be considered as a variation of the classical Frobenius Theorem in the singular case (see e.g., [N, 2.11]). Theorem 1. Let A ⊂ D be a subalgebra. (a) There is a set of germs X as above such that A = DX if and only if A is a visible subalgebra of D. (b) There is a smooth germ X ⊂ (Cn, 0) different from ∅ and (Cn, 0) such that A = DX if and only if A is a maximal visible subalgebra of D. (c) There is an irreducible germ X ⊂ (Cn, 0) with an isolated singularity at 0 such that A = DX if and only if A is a maximal visible subalgebra of the algebra D0 of vector fields vanishing at 0. n (d) There is an analytic germ X ⊂ (C , 0) such that A = DX if and only if A is geometric in D, i.e. by definition, A is visible in every subalgebra B of D containing A.

Comments. (i) It is easy to see that the family X of germs Xi is not unique. For example, if X is the set of irreducible components Xi of some germ X = S Xi one has DX = DX. Moreover, DX = DX,Sing X where Sing X denotes the singular subspace of X. But in case X is an irredundant set of irreducible germs, i.e., deleting any germ from X alters DX, the family X is uniquely determined by DX. In particular, the variety X of a maximal geometric subalgebra as in (b) and (c) is unique. (ii) There is a relative version of Theorem 1 where D is replaced by DZ for some set of germs Z and where all varieties X associated to visible subalgebras of DZ are determined. Namely, a subalgebra A of DZ is visible if and only if there is a set of irreducible germs X with Xi 6⊂ Zj for all i, j such that A = DZ,X. Theorem 1 represents the cases Z = ∅, resp. Z = {0}. ANALYTIC VARIETIES VERSUS INTEGRAL VARIETIES 3

2. Singularities are determined by their tangent algebra We now turn to the second problem, the characterization of the isomorphism type of germs via their Lie algebra. If X, Y ⊂ (Cn, 0) are isomorphic then the associated Lie algebras DX and DY are isomorphic. In fact, every isomorphism X → Y can be extended to an automorphism φ of (Cn, 0) with algebra automorphism ∗ ∗ ∗ −1 φ : On → On. Then Φ(D) := φ ◦D ◦(φ ) defines an automorphism Φ of D with ∗ Φ(DY )= DX . By we write again Φ = φ . This is continuous if D is provided with the topology induced from the coefficientwise topology on On. Conversely we have Theorem 2. Let X and Y be germs of analytic varieties in (Cn, 0) different from ∅. Assume that n ≥ 3. For every isomorphism Φ: DY → DX of topological Lie algebras there is a unique automorphism φ of (Cn, 0) sending X onto Y and such that Φ= φ∗. Thus the analytic isomorphism type of X is entirely given by the abstract topo- logical Lie algebra DX . Omori [O] proved this in the special case of weighted homogeneous varieties. We indicate some ideas appearing in the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2.

3. Proof of Theorem 1 In order to study visible subalgebras of D we associate to any A ⊂ D the germ n X(A) in (C , 0) defined by the ideal pI(A) of On where

I(A)= {g ∈ On, g · D ⊂ A}.

Here the On-module structure of D is used. The germ X(A) will be called the integral variety of X. Note that every germ X ⊂ (Cn, 0) different from ∅ and n (C , 0) can be recovered from DX as X = X(DX ): The inclusion X(DX ) ⊂ X is obvious from the definition. For the converse, assume that some g ∈ I(DX ) does

not belong to IX . Consider the vector fields g∂x1 , . . . , g∂xn . In every point outside the zero set of g in X they are linearly independent. As they are tangent to X by definition of I(DX ) a Theorem of Rossi [R, Theorem 3.2] implies that the germ of X taken in such a point is isomorphic to (Cn, 0). But these points are dense in X and we get a contradiction. Let us now consider assertion (b) of Theorem 1. The proof that DX is a balanced subalgebra of D is a bit involved and will be left out. Concerning maximality, assume that DX is contained in a balanced subalgebra A ⊂ D. Then in fact DX ⊂ n A ⊂ DX(A). One shows that A balanced implies X(A) 6= ∅ and (C , 0). Moreover X(A) = X(DX(A)) ⊂ X(DX ) = X. Now if X is smooth one deduces from DX ⊂ DX(A) that X(A)= X. This shows DX = A and proves necessity in (b). For sufficiency, start with a maximal visible subalgebra A ⊂ D. Similarly as n above A ⊂ DX(A) with X(A) 6= ∅ and (C , 0). As DX(A) is balanced, maximality of A gives A = DX(A). Write X = X(A). If Sing X 6= ∅ then DSing X is balanced. Again by maximality, the inclusion DX ⊂ DSing X is actually an equality. This implies X = Sing X, which is impossible. Therefore X is smooth. Part (a) of Theorem 1 is proved by induction. Here one proves and uses at once the relative version of the theorem mentioned earlier. To illustrate, let X = {X} consist of one singular germ X. Choose k ∈ N maximal with Z = Singk X := 4 HERWIG HAUSER AND GERD MULLER¨

Sing(··· (Sing(X)) 6= ∅. The inclusion DX ⊂ D is split into DX = DZ,X ⊂ DZ and DZ ⊂ D. The first is visible by induction and the second is maximal visible by (b) since Z is smooth. Conversely, if A is a visible subalgebra of D use induction on the length of the chain and the relative version of part (b) to find X.

4. Proof of Theorem 2

We conclude with some remarks on the proof of Theorem 2. For f ∈ On consider the C-linear map λf : DX → DX defined by

−1 λf (D)=Φ(f · Φ (D)).

n ∗ If Φ: DY → DX is induced from an automorphism φ of (C , 0), say Φ = φ , one ∗ checks by computation that the equality λf (D)= φ (f ) · D holds for all D in DX . If Φ is an arbitrary continuous Lie algebra isomorphism, we are led to establish the same equality in order to recover a map φ that could be an appropriate candidate to induce Φ and to define an isomorphism between X and Y . Thus the first thing to do is to check whether any vector field D is mapped by λf into the On-module (D) generated by D. This can be seen for all D of a certain dense U of IX · D by writing (D) as an intersection of subalgebras of DX of form DX,Z . This is the key step in the proof and it is here that we need the assumption n ≥ 3. Once this is accomplished, the relative version of Theorem 1 and the fact that Φ is a Lie algebra isomorphism guarantee that λf maps DX,Z into DX,Z . Hence the module (D) is mapped into itself. This implies

∗ λf (D)= φ (f,D) · D

∗ with suitable factor φ (f,D) ∈ On. Then the continuity of Φ is used to show that φ∗(f,D) is actually independent of D, say φ∗(f,D) = φ∗(f ). Therefore, again by continuity, ∗ λf (D)= φ (f ) · D

will hold for all D ∈ IX · D. Finally we deduce from this equality that the map φ thus obtained is an automorphism of (Cn, 0) mapping X to Y and inducing Φ.

References

[HM1] H. Hauser and G. M¨uller, Analytic varieties and Lie algebras of vector fields. Part I: The Gr¨obner correspondence, preprint 1991. To be published. [HM2] , Analytic varieties and Lie algebras of vector fields. Part II: Singularities are determined by their tangent algebra (to appear). [N] R. Narasimhan, Analysis on real and complex manifolds, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1968. [O] H.Omori, A method of classifying expansive singularities, J. Differential Geom. 15 (1980), 493–512. [R] H.Rossi, Vector fields on analytic spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 78 (1963), 455–467.

Mathematisches Institut der Universitat¨ Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Fachbereich Mathematik der Universitat¨ Mainz, D-6500 Mainz, Germany