Colley Cibber

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Colley Cibber ^^ COLLEY GIBBER \'. ' " Master Colley ! then forfeit him Original painting- by B. Wesley Rand l^tmx & 33elle0 of 6nglanb Colley Gibber Vol u me I. Written by Himself The Grolier Society London EDITION DE LUXE Limited to One Thousand Copies SANTA BAU:3AUA K.uuur.y.1 PR 33H7 V. I CONTENTS CHAPTER I. PACE The Introduction — The Author's Birth — Various Fortune at School — Not Liked by Those He Lov'd There — Why — A Digression upon Raillery — The Use and Abuse of It — The Comforts of Folly — Vanity of Great- ness — Laughing, No Bad Philosophy . '57 CHAPTER II. He That Writes of Himself Not Easily Tir'd — Boys May Give Men Lessons — The Author's Preferment at School Attended with Misfortunes — The Danger of Merit among Equals — Of Satirists and Backbiters — What Effect They Have Had upon the Author — Stanzas Publish 'd by Himself against Himself . • ^S CHAPTER III. The Author's Several Chances for the Church, the Court, and the Army — Going to the University — Met the Revolution at Nottingham — Took Arms on That Side — What He Saw of It — A Few Political Thoughts — Fortune Willing to Do for Him — His Neglect of Her — The Stage Preferr'd to All Her Favours — The Pro- fession of an Actor Consider'd — The Misfortunes and Advantages of It II2 V VI CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER IV. A Short View of the Stage, from the Year 1660 to the Revolution — The King's and Duke's Company United, Composed the Best Set of English Actors Yet Known — Their Several Theatrical Characters .... 144 CHAPTER V. The Theatrical Characters of the Principal Actors in the Year 1690, Continu'd — A Few Words to Critical Auditors 178 CHAPTER VI. The Author's First Step upon the Stage — His Discourage- ments — The Best Actors in Europe 111 Us'd — A Revo- lution in Their Favour — King William Grants Them a License to Act in Lincoln's Inn Fields — The Author's Distress in Being Thought a Worse Actor Than a Poet — Reduc'd to Write a Part for Himself — His Success — More Remarks upon Theatrical Action — Some upon Himself 240 CHAPTER VIL The State of the Stage Continued — The Occasion of Wilks's Commencing Actor — His Success — Facts Re- -^ lating to His Theatrical Talent — Actors More or Less Esteem'd from Their Private Characters .... 288 CHAPTER VIII. The Patentee of Drury Lane Wiser than His Actors — His Particular Management — The Author Continues to Write Plays — Why — The Best Dramatic Poets Cen- " " sured by J. Collier, in His Short View of the Stage — It Has a Good Effect — The Master of the Revels, CONTENTS vii PAGE from That Time, Cautious in His Licensing New Plays — A Complaint against Him — His Authority Founded upon Custom Only — The Late Law for Fixing That Authority in a Proper Person, Considered . 323 CHAPTER IX. A Small Apology for Writing On — The Different State of the Two Companies — Wilks Invited Over from Dublin — Estcourt, from the Same Stage, the Winter Follow- ing — Mrs. Oldfield's First Admission to the Theatre Royal — Her Character — The Great Theatre in the Hay-Market Built for Betterton's Company — It An- swers Not Their Expectation — Some Observations upon It — A Theatrical State Secret .... 360 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PAGB "Master Colley! then forfeit him" Frontispiece COLLEY ClBBER 85 Caius Cibber 113 " Mrs. Bracegirdle as " The Indian Queen . 230 William Bullock 254 Covent Garden, Interior 341 INTRODUCTION CoLLEY Gibber's famous Autobiography has al- ways been recognised as one of the most dehght- ful books of its class ; but to students of theatrical history, the charm of its author's ingenuous frank- ness has been unable altogether to overweigh the inaccuracy and vagueness of his treatment of mat- ters of fact. To remove this cause of complaint is the principal object of the present edition. But correcting errors is only one of an editor's duties, and by no means the most difficult. More exact- ing, and almost equally important, are the illustra- tion of the circumstances surrounding the author, the elucidation of his references to current events, and the comparison of his statements and theories with those of judicious contemporaries. In all these particulars I have interpreted my duty in the widest sense, and have aimed at giving, as far as in me lies, an exhaustive commentary on the "Apology," I am fortunate in being able to claim that my work contains much information which has never before been made public. A careful investigation " viii INTRODUCTION of the MSS. in the British Museum, and of the records of the Lord Chamberlain's Office (to which my access was greatly facilitated by the kindness of Mr. Edward F. S. Pigott, the licenser of plays), has enabled me to give the exact dates of many transactions which were previously un- certain, and to give references to documents of great importance in stage history, whose very ex- istence was before unknown. How important my new matter is, may be estimated by comparing the facts given in my notes regarding the intricate transactions of the years 1707 to 1721, with any previous history of the same period. Among other sources of information, I may mention the Gibber Collections in the Forster Library at South Kensington, to which my attention was drawn by the kindness of the courteous keeper, Mr. R. F. Sketchley ; and I have also, of course, devoted much time to contemporary newspapers. In order to illustrate the *' Apology," two tracts of the utmost rarity, the '* Historia Histrionica and Anthony Aston's "Brief Supplement" to Cibber's " Lives of the Actors," are reprinted in this edition. The " Historia Histrionica " was written, all authorities agree, by James Wright, barrister-at-law, whose " History and Antiquities of the County of Rutland " is quoted by Cibber in his first chapter (vol. i. p. 65). The historical value of this pamphlet is very great, because it contains the only formal account in existence of the gener- INTRODUCTION ix ation of actors who preceded Betterton, and be- cause it gives many curious and interesting particulars regarding the theatres and plays, as well as the actors, before and during the Civil Wars. As Gibber begins his account of the stage (see chap, iv.) at the Restoration, there is a pecu- liar propriety in prefacing it by Wright's work ; a fact which has already been recognised, for the publisher of the third edition (1750) of the "Apol- ogy " appended to it *• A Dialogue on Old Plays and Old Players," which is simply a reprint of the " Historia Histrionica " under another title, and without the curious preface. Following the " Historia Histrionica " will be found a copy of the patent granted to Sir William Davenant, one of the most important documents in English stage history. A similar grant was made to Thomas Killigrew, as is noted on page 145 of this volume. These documents form a natural introduction to Gibber's history of the stage and of his own career, which commences, as has been said, at the Restoration, and ends, somewhat abruptly, with his retirement from the regular exercise of his profession in 1733. To complete the record of Gibber's life, I have added a supplementary chap- ter to the " Apology," in which I have also noted briefly the chief incidents of theatrical history up to the time of his death. In this, too, I have told with some degree of minuteness the story of his X INTRODUCTION famous quarrel with Pope ; and to this chapter I have appended a list of Gibber's dramatic produc- tions, and a bibliography of works by, or relating to him. Anthony Aston's " Brief Supplement to Colley Gibber, Esq. ; His Lives of the Late Famous Actors and Actresses," of which a reprint is given with this edition, is almost, if not quite, the rarest of theatrical books. Isaac Reed, says Genest, "wrote his name in his copy of Aston's little book, * with the date of 1 769 ; he says : This pamphlet contains several circumstances concerning the per- formers of the last century, which are nowhere else to be found ; it seems never to have been published.' He adds: 'Easter Monday, 1795 — though I have now possessed this pamphlet twenty-six years, it is remarkable that I never have seen another copy of it.' " Of Aston himself, little is known. According to his own account he came on the stage about 1 700, and we know that he was a noted stroller ; but as to when he was born, or when he died, there is no information. He is supposed, and probably with justice, to be the " trusty Anthony, who has so often adorned both the theatres in England and Ireland," mentioned in Estcourt's advertisement of his opening of the Bumper Tavern, in the Spectator of 28th and 29th December, 171 1 ; and he was, no doubt, a well-known character among actors and theatre- goers. He would thus be well qualified for his " INTRODUCTION xi undertaking as biographer of the actors of his time; and, indeed, his work bears every mark of being the production of a writer thoroughly well acquainted with his subject. This valuable pam- phlet has been, until now, practically a sealed book to theatrical students. The " Apology " of Gibber has gone through six editions. I have reprinted the text of the second, because it was certainly revised by the author, and many corrections made. But I have carefully compared my text with that of the first edition, and, wherever the correction is more than merely verbal, I have indicated the fact in a note {e.
Recommended publications
  • Weaver, Words, and Dancing in the Judgment of Paris
    On Common Ground 5:Weaver, Dance inWords, Drama, and Drama Dancing in in DanceThe Judgment of Paris DHDS March 2005 Text copyright © Moira Goff and DHDS 2005 Weaver, Words, and Dancing in The Judgment of Paris Moira Goff On 31 January 1733, the Daily Post let its readers know that ‘The Judgment of Paris, which was intended to be perform’d this Night, is deferr’d for a few Days, upon Account of some Alterations in the Machinery’. John Weaver’s new afterpiece, which was to be his last work for the London stage, received its first performance at Drury Lane on 6 February 1733.1 Weaver had not created a serious dance work since his ‘Dramatic Entertainments of Danc- ing’ The Loves of Mars and Venus of 1717 and Orpheus and Eurydice of 1718. When the description for The Judgment of Paris was published to accompany performances, it an- nounced a change from Weaver’s earlier practice by referring to the work as a ‘Dramatic Entertainment in Dancing and Singing’.2 Why did Weaver resort to words? Did he feel that they were necessary to attract audiences and explain the story to them? The Judgment of Paris was performed six times between 6 and 15 February 1733, and then dropped out of the repertoire. On 31 March The Harlot’s Progress; or, The Ridotto Al’Fresco was given its first performance. This afterpiece by Theophilus Cibber, based on the very popular series of paintings and prints by William Hogarth, included a ‘Grand Masque call’d, The Judgment of Paris’.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the Work of Colley Cibber
    BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HUMANISTIC STUDIES Vol. 1 October 1, 1912 No. 1 STUDIES IN THE WORK OF COLLEY CIBBER BY DE WITT C.:'CROISSANT, PH.D. A ssistant Professor of English Language in the University of Kansas LAWRENCE, OCTOBER. 1912 PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY CONTENTS I Notes on Cibber's Plays II Cibber and the Development of Sentimental Comedy Bibliography PREFACE The following studies are extracts from a longer paper on the life and work of Cibber. No extended investigation concerning the life or the literary activity of Cibber has recently appeared, and certain misconceptions concerning his personal character, as well as his importance in the development of English literature and the literary merit of his plays, have been becoming more and more firmly fixed in the minds of students. Cibber was neither so much of a fool nor so great a knave as is generally supposed. The estimate and the judgment of two of his contemporaries, Pope and Dennis, have been far too widely accepted. The only one of the above topics that this paper deals with, otherwise than incidentally, is his place in the development of a literary mode. While Cibber was the most prominent and influential of the innovators among the writers of comedy of his time, he was not the only one who indicated the change toward sentimental comedy in his work. This subject, too, needs fuller investigation. I hope, at some future time, to continue my studies in this field. This work was suggested as a subject for a doctor's thesis, by Professor John Matthews Manly, while I was a graduate student at the University of Chicago a number of years ago, and was con• tinued later under the direction of Professor Thomas Marc Par- rott at Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • Her Hour Upon the Stage: a Study of Anne Bracegirdle, Restoration Actress
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1965 Her Hour Upon the Stage: A Study of Anne Bracegirdle, Restoration Actress Julie Ann Farrer Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Farrer, Julie Ann, "Her Hour Upon the Stage: A Study of Anne Bracegirdle, Restoration Actress" (1965). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2862. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2862 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HER HOUR UPON THE STAGE: A STUDY OF ANNE BRAC EGIRDLE, RESTORATION ACTRESS by Julie Ann Farrer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in English UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1965 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis, in its final form, owes much to a number of willing people, without whose help the entire undertaking would be incomplete or else impossible. First thanks must go to Dr. Robert C. Steensma, chairman of my committee, and an invaluable source of help and encour­ agement throughout the entire year. I am also indebted to the members of my committee, Dr. Del Rae Christiansen and Dr. King Hendricks for valid and helpful suggestions . Appreciation is extended to Utah State University, to the English department and to Dr. Hendricks . I thank my understanding parents for making it possible and my friends for ma~ing it worthwhile .
    [Show full text]
  • An A2 Timeline of the London Stage Between 1660 and 1737
    1660-61 1659-60 1661-62 1662-63 1663-64 1664-65 1665-66 1666-67 William Beeston The United Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company @ Salisbury Court Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company & Thomas Killigrew @ Salisbury Court @Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Rhodes’s Company @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Red Bull Theatre @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields George Jolly John Rhodes @ Salisbury Court @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane The King’s Company The King’s Company PLAGUE The King’s Company The King’s Company The King’s Company Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew June 1665-October 1666 Anthony Turner Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew @ Vere Street Theatre @ Vere Street Theatre & Edward Shatterell @ Red Bull Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Bridges Street Theatre, GREAT FIRE @ Red Bull Theatre Drury Lane (from 7/5/1663) The Red Bull Players The Nursery @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane September 1666 @ Red Bull Theatre George Jolly @ Hatton Garden 1676-77 1675-76 1674-75 1673-74 1672-73 1671-72 1670-71 1669-70 1668-69 1667-68 The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company Thomas Betterton & William Henry Harrison and Thomas Henry Harrison & Thomas Sir William Davenant Smith for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Milling
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE ‘“For Without Vanity I’m Better Known”: Restoration Actors and Metatheatre on the London Stage.’ AUTHORS Milling, Jane JOURNAL Theatre Survey DEPOSITED IN ORE 18 March 2013 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/4491 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Theatre Survey 52:1 (May 2011) # American Society for Theatre Research 2011 doi:10.1017/S0040557411000068 Jane Milling “FOR WITHOUT VANITY,I’M BETTER KNOWN”: RESTORATION ACTORS AND METATHEATRE ON THE LONDON STAGE Prologue, To the Duke of Lerma, Spoken by Mrs. Ellen[Nell], and Mrs. Nepp. NEPP: How, Mrs. Ellen, not dress’d yet, and all the Play ready to begin? EL[LEN]: Not so near ready to begin as you think for. NEPP: Why, what’s the matter? ELLEN: The Poet, and the Company are wrangling within. NEPP: About what? ELLEN: A prologue. NEPP: Why, Is’t an ill one? NELL[ELLEN]: Two to one, but it had been so if he had writ any; but the Conscious Poet with much modesty, and very Civilly and Sillily—has writ none.... NEPP: What shall we do then? ’Slife let’s be bold, And speak a Prologue— NELL[ELLEN]: —No, no let us Scold.1 When Samuel Pepys heard Nell Gwyn2 and Elizabeth Knipp3 deliver the prologue to Robert Howard’s The Duke of Lerma, he recorded the experience in his diary: “Knepp and Nell spoke the prologue most excellently, especially Knepp, who spoke beyond any creature I ever heard.”4 By 20 February 1668, when Pepys noted his thoughts, he had known Knipp personally for two years, much to the chagrin of his wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’
    Early Theatre 11.2 (2008) Christopher Matusiak Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’ The decision in February 1637 to appoint Christopher Beeston (alias Hut- chinson) ‘Gouuernor of the new Company of the Kings & Queenes boyes’ crowned one of the busiest and most innovative careers in seventeenth-cen- tury commercial theatre.1 Beeston had emerged in the 1590s as a young per- former in the Chamberlain’s Men, notably acting with Richard Burbage, Wil- liam Kempe, and William Shakespeare in the first production of Ben Jonson’s Every Man in His Humour. For the better part of the next two decades, he managed the financial affairs of Queen Anne’s Men at the Red Bull and with that company’s assets at his disposal, particularly its valuable wardrobe, he oversaw the building of west London’s first playhouse in 1616 — the Cock- pit (or Phoenix) in Drury Lane. By 1636, Beeston had established himself as London’s pre-eminent theatrical entrepreneur, having led Queen Henri- etta Maria’s fashionable company for ten years and amassed an unpreced- ented personal treasury of playbooks, acting apparel, and other tiring house materials. However, in May of that year the worst outbreak of plague in three decades closed the theatres and suppressed business until the following October 1637. Under the stress of eighteenth months of enforced idleness, acting companies buckled, setting patents and personnel adrift. Among the casualties was Beeston’s relationship with the Queen’s Men. From his van- tage point at the competing Salisbury
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP Theses Crowther 2017.Pdf
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 97559 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications James Shirley and the Restoration Stage By Stefania Crowther A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Renaissance Studies University of Warwick, Centre for Renaissance Studies June 2017 2 3 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by the James Shirley Complete Works Project, and funded by the AHRC, and Centre for Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick. I would like to thank these organisations, and in particular Jayne Browne, Ingrid de Smett, David Lines, Jayne Brown, Heather Pilbin, Paul Botley, and especially Elizabeth Clarke and Paul Prescott for their very helpful guidance during the upgrade process. Special thanks are due to Hannah Davis, whose URSS project on Restoration Shirley, supervised by Teresa Grant, provided the starting point for this thesis. I am also enormously grateful to the colleagues, friends and tutors who have inspired and supported my work: Daniel Ashman, Thomasin Bailey, Stephen Clucas, Michael Dobson, Peter Foreshaw, Douglas Hawes, Simon Jackson, Victoria Jones, Griff Jameson, Peter Kirwan, Chris Main, Gerry McAlpine, Zois Pigadas, Catherine Smith, Lee White, Susan Wiseman.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical •Ÿgovernorâ•Ž
    Early Theatre 11.2 (2008) Christopher Matusiak Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’ The decision in February 1637 to appoint Christopher Beeston (alias Hut- chinson) ‘Gouuernor of the new Company of the Kings & Queenes boyes’ crowned one of the busiest and most innovative careers in seventeenth-cen- tury commercial theatre.1 Beeston had emerged in the 1590s as a young per- former in the Chamberlain’s Men, notably acting with Richard Burbage, Wil- liam Kempe, and William Shakespeare in the first production of Ben Jonson’s Every Man in His Humour. For the better part of the next two decades, he managed the financial affairs of Queen Anne’s Men at the Red Bull and with that company’s assets at his disposal, particularly its valuable wardrobe, he oversaw the building of west London’s first playhouse in 1616 — the Cock- pit (or Phoenix) in Drury Lane. By 1636, Beeston had established himself as London’s pre-eminent theatrical entrepreneur, having led Queen Henri- etta Maria’s fashionable company for ten years and amassed an unpreced- ented personal treasury of playbooks, acting apparel, and other tiring house materials. However, in May of that year the worst outbreak of plague in three decades closed the theatres and suppressed business until the following October 1637. Under the stress of eighteenth months of enforced idleness, acting companies buckled, setting patents and personnel adrift. Among the casualties was Beeston’s relationship with the Queen’s Men. From his van- tage point at the competing Salisbury
    [Show full text]
  • Spectacular Disappearances: Celebrity and Privacy, 1696-1801
    Revised Pages Spectacular DiSappearanceS Revised Pages Revised Pages Spectacular Disappearances Celebrity and Privacy, 1696– 1801 Julia H. Fawcett University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Revised Pages Copyright © 2016 by Julia H. Fawcett All rights reserved This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. Published in the United States of America by the University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid- free paper 2019 2018 2017 2016 4 3 2 1 A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978– 0- 472– 11980– 6 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN 978– 0- 472– 12180– 9 (e-book) Revised Pages Acknowledgments I have often wondered if my interest in authors who wrote themselves in order to obscure themselves stems from my own anxieties about the permanence of the printed word—m y own longing (that I imagine everyone shares?) for words that linger on the page for a moment only and then— miraculously, mercifully— disappear before their inadequacies can be exposed. I think I will always harbor this anxiety, but I have been blessed with mentors, colleagues, friends, and family members who have known how to couch their criticism in kindness and without whom I could never have summoned the courage to keep this work up or to set these words down. The germs for this book’s ideas began many years ago, when, as an under- graduate at Harvard, I stumbled somewhat accidentally (to fulfill a require- ment) into Lynn Festa’s course on “Sex and Sensibility during the Enlighten- ment.” Thank goodness for requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Season of 1702-03
    Season of 1702-1703 nsofar as we can judge from scrappy evidence, the two companies arrived I at a modus vivendi of sorts this season. The bitter battles of the past few years and the very real threat of the collapse of the second company are no longer evident in prologues and epilogues: the accommodation that was to lead to joint performances at court in 1704 is starting to become evident. Probably neither company was flourishing, but both appear to have been sol- vent. Nonetheless, no insider could have imagined that the situation would remain long unchanged: the tiny and makeshift Lincoln’s Inn Fields theatre was not viable for the long run. Sometime in the spring of 1703, John Van- brugh, observing an opportunity, started to canvass backers for a new theatre. His intentions are manifest in the calculations he made at this time (printed below, under “ca. April” 1703). Vanbrugh’s hope was to engineer a new theatrical union and recombine the two companies in an elegant new theatre of his own design. The personnel he pencilled into his plan show that while he intended to stage “opera” and dance, his primary repertory would be English plays. The two hostile companies of 1695 had fought themselves to a stalemate: Vanbrugh turned out to be the unexpected means by which Lon- don theatre escaped the circumstances in which it had become stuck. Unfortunately, the process was to be a bumpy one. Vanbrugh’s efforts to negotiate or force a union were to fail; his new theatre proved less than ideal for spoken plays; and his successful grab at an opera monopoly in 1708 was to put him at the verge of bankruptcy in just four months.
    [Show full text]
  • William Congreve University Archives
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange The John C. Hodges Collection of William Congreve University Archives Spring 1970 The John C. Hodges Collection of William Congreve Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_libarccong Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation "The John C. Hodges Collection of William Congreve" (1970). The John C. Hodges Collection of William Congreve. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_libarccong/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the University Archives at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in The John C. Hodges Collection of William Congreve by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE LIBRARIES Occasional Publication NU:MBER 1 • SPRING 1970 The Occasional Publication of The University of Tennessee Libraries is intended to be very flexible in its content and in its frequency of publication. As a medium for descriptive works re­ lated to various facets of library collections as well as for contributions of merit on a variety of topics, it will not be limited in format or subject matter, nor will it be issued at prescribed intervals' JOHN DOBSON, EDITOR JOHN C. HODGES 1892-1967 THE JOHN C. HODGES COLLECTION OF William Congreve In The University of Tennessee Library: A Bibliographical Catalog. Compiled by ALBERT M. LYLES and JOHN DOBSON KNOXVILLE· THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE LIBRARIES· 1970 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 73-631247 Copyright © 1970 by The University of Tennessee Libraries, Knoxville, Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian Hero at Drury Lane
    DL Layout NEW_Layout 1 05/04/2013 10:03 Page 129 9 A Christian Hero at Drury Lane hen Christopher Rich was kicked out of Drury Lane, everyone assumed that would be the end of his troublesome Wcareer in the London theatre. Rich, however, was a man who seemed to be constitutionally incapable of even contemplating defeat, so when he realised that his time at Drury Lane was at an end, he turned his attention to the theatre that was now standing empty in Lincoln’s Inn Fields. From as far back as 1708, when things were getting rocky, Rich had been paying rent on the Lincoln’s Inn Fields building, which had been unused since Betterton took his company to the Haymarket in 1705. With Drury Lane now occupied by his enemies, Rich began what was virtually a reconstruction of the old tennis court to turn it into a serious rival to his former theatre. ere was one huge problem: although he held both patents issued by Charles II, he had been silenced, so even if he had a theatre, he couldn’t put on plays. However, with a new monarch on the throne and a new Lord Chamberlain in office, he thought he would try again, and he got one of his well-connected investors in the Lincoln’s Inn Fields project to speak to the King. George I probably knew little and cared less about Rich’s management of Drury Lane, and simply said that, when he used to visit London as a young 129 DL Layout NEW_Layout 1 05/04/2013 10:03 Page 130 THE OTHER NATIONAL THEATRE man, there were two theatres, and he didn’t see why there shouldn’t be two theatres again.
    [Show full text]