16 Dirkie Uys Defends His Father (11 April 1838) A2/A3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

16 Dirkie Uys Defends His Father (11 April 1838) A2/A3 16 Dirkie Uys defends his father (11 April 1838) A2/A3 B2 C2 D N 16 Dirkie Uys 26 27 1 25 2 South wall, south-west projection, above door (panel 20/31) 24 3 h. 2.3 × 2.4 m 4 23 Restored fractures on the vertical edges Sculptor of the clay maquette: Laurika Postma 22 5 Stages of production 21 A1 W.H. Coetzer, pencil drawing, retained only in A2 (April–June 1937) 6 A2 Reproduction of A1 (June 1937) 20 A3 W.H. Coetzer, revised pencil drawing A1, h. 13.4 × w. 15.2 cm 7 (after September 1937) 19 Annotation: ‘Dirkie Uys’ 8 18 A4 W.H. Coetzer, Dirkie Uys; monochrome oil on board, h. 27 × w. 27 cm 17 9 (late 1937–38?) 16 10 B1 One-third-scale clay maquette, not extant but replicated in B2 (1942–43) 15 14 13 12 11 B2 One-third-scale plaster maquette, h. 78.5 × w. 85 × d. 8 cm (1942–43) C1 Full-scale wooden armature, not extant (1943–46) 0 5 10 m C2 Full-scale clay relief, not extant but photographed; replicated in C3 (1943–46) C3 Full-scale plaster relief (1943–46), not extant but copied in D (late 1947–49) D Marble as installed in the Monument (1949) Early records SVK minutes (4.9.1937) ― item 4m (see below, ‘Development of the design’) Voorstelle (5.12.1934?) ― item 14 ‘Vlugkommando keer verslae terug. Piet Uys gewond, sy seun Dirk sterf by hom: Donga aan die bokant waarvan perderuiters deurjaag, agtervolg deur vyand. Aan die anderkant (oorkant die sloot) Uys van sy perd, en sy seun oor hom gekniel, word met assegai gegooi’ (Flight commando turns back defeated. Piet Uys wounded, his son Dirk dies alongside him: donga at the top through which horseriders rush, followed by enemy. On the other side [across the ditch] Uys [fallen] from his horse, and his son kneeling over him, are showered with assegais) Panele (c. Dec 1934–36) ― item 9 ‘Indiwiduele heldedade (a) Dirkie Uys’ (Individual heroic deeds [a] Dirkie Uys) Wenke (c. 1934–36) ― item I. F.A. STEYTLER, g. ‘Dirkie Uys omsingel deur Soeloes word doodgesteek by die lyk van sy vader’ (Dirkie Uys surrounded by Zulu is stabbed to death next to the body of his father) Moerdyk Layout (5.10.1936–15.1.1937) ― scene 13 on panel 19/31, ‘Dirkie Uys’ Jansen Memorandum (19.1.1937) ― item 7.13 ‘Heroic death of Dirkie Uys’ Open Access. © 2020 Elizabeth Rankin and Rolf Michael Schneider, published by De Gruyter and African Minds. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110668797-021 348 16 Dirkie Uys Figure 16.1: D. Dirkie Uys. 1949. Marble, 2.3 × 2.4 m (courtesy of VTM; photo Russell Scott) Description 349 Description Although a group of three Zulu towers above him and fills the height of the panel, a young Voor- trekker is clearly the all-important protagonist here, picked out because he is isolated on the left, with ample space around him (fig. 16.1). It is Dirkie Uys who, undaunted by the heroically propor- tioned attackers with their raised assegais,788 kneels to aim his muzzleloader directly at the central figure. The Zulu on the far right has already been despatched and topples backwards with a dra- matically up-flung arm, while another is stretched out lifeless in front of the boy. In the foreground his father, Piet Uys, lies facing in the opposite direction to the dead Zulu, obscuring most of his body and shield, Uys’ limbs echoed by the corpse’s lifeless outstretched arm. Mortally wounded and with drooping head, Uys barely raises his upper body on his left elbow, while his right hand grasps the edge of the marble panel as though he tries to support himself. Yet he is staged frontally in a tranquil classical pose and, within the decorous frame provided by his arms, his dying face with half-closed eyes shows little sign of his suffering. He remains dignified and neatly dressed even in death, with only a loose lock of hair suggesting any loss of his calm control. Despite Dirkie’s valiant attempt to defend him, the boy’s isolation makes him appear vulnerable and a tragic end is inevitable. A riderless horse that gallops away in the left background, against a scene enclosed by flat-topped mountains, adds to the sense that the two Voortrekkers have been abandoned to their fate. 788 For Zulu dress and arms, see Bloukrans. 350 16 Dirkie Uys Figure 16.2: A2. W.H. Coetzer. Reproduction of first sketch for Dirkie Uys. June 1937 (courtesy of ARCA PV94 1/75/5/1; photo the authors) Figure 16.3: A3. W.H. Coetzer. ‘Dirkie Uys’. After September 1937. Pencil, 13.4 × 15.2 cm. Revised first sketch (photo courtesy of Museum Africa, no. 66/2194H) Developing the design 351 Developing the design Already the reproduction of Coetzer’s first drawing (fig. 16.2) shows a compositional divide of the Voortrekkers and their foes similar to the final marble. Six Zulu (one of them wounded) are approaching from the right with assegais and shields to attack the two Voortrekkers who occupy the lower left-hand side of the composition. Two people lie dead on the ground. One, at the lower right corner, partly beyond the frame, is a Zulu who lies on top of his shield and two abandoned assegais. The other, centrally positioned, is the body of Piet Uys in an oblique foreshortened view. He still clings to his rifle, but his head falls backwards towards the viewer, hat abandoned, shirt unbuttoned and legs curiously crossed. The awkward angle of his head is echoed in the wounded Zulu at the top. Next to his father, a bare-headed Dirkie with short tousled hair balances himself on one knee (the other oddly angled) to take aim with his gun, its weight partly supported on an outcrop of jagged rocks that affords him a little shelter. Behind him on the far left a horse without saddle looks back as it moves away. The Historiese Komitee requested the following alterations at its meeting on 4 September 1937: Death of Dirkie Uys. Italeni is level land with high grass. Show rolling hills; the fight takes place on the bank of a small stream; it must be a flintgun; show a horse that runs away.789 The final pencil sketch (fig. 16.3) shows traces of a different drawing underneath with a full face and left arm of the Zulu nearest to Dirkie; at some point they were for the most part covered by a shield. Following the committee’s instruction, Coetzer removed the rocks (faint signs are still detectable) and covered the ground with the requisite high grass. Without the rocky prop for his gun, Dirkie now has to support its full weight and his hands are enlarged as though to indicate this. The changes also meant that the lower part of some Zulu previously hidden by the rocks became visible amidst the grass, so that Coetzer had to supply them with legs, including some puzzlingly positioned buttocks and a bent leg in the middle of the group. The horse is similar, but its left rear leg is now lifted and the mane ruffled to suggest greater movement, and the addition of a saddle suggests that it has been abandoned by its rider. Apart from the more elevated position of Piet Uys and his inward gaze towards the Zulu attack, Coetzer’s monochrome oil (fig. 16.4) is close to his revised drawing (fig. 16.3), although the horse is without a saddle, and the grassland setting implies that it was made after the feedback from the Historiese Komitee. For the small plaster maquette (fig. 16.5), Laurika Postma changed Coetzer’s arrangement sig- nificantly, although she reintroduced rocks, showing her dependence on the earlier drawing. They form a natural stage, with more coherent flat layers, rather than a steep and rugged barrier. Again Zulu close in from the right, brandishing assegais and small shields. Two figures are more distant, while two are depicted prominently in the foreground, one forcefully attacking, the other dramati- cally collapsing, precariously balanced on the toes of his left foot on a rectangular rock. On the far left a much younger Dirkie Uys kneels on a rocky pedestal with his far knee raised in a calm and compact pose. He takes aim at the attacking Zulu in the foreground with his rifle, the barrel omi- nously overlapping the head of a dead Zulu staged prostrate on the rocks. It is not clear which of the Zulu is in the line of fire although the collapsing figure on the far right is presumably the victim. The foreground figure is again Piet Uys, now shown in a reversed pose parallel to the picture plane, with his far knee raised. The right arm crosses the body to rest over his rifle, the hand framed by the 789 ‘Dood van Dirkie Uys. Italeni is ’n gelyk wêreld met hoë gras. Wys rollende heuwels; die geveg vind op die wal van ’n klein spruitjie plaas; dit moet ’n vuursteengeweer wees; wys ’n perd wat weghardloop’ (Historiese Komitee 4.9.1937: 4m). 352 16 Dirkie Uys Figure 16.4: A4. W.H. Coetzer. Dirkie Uys. Late 1937–38? Monochrome oil on board, 27 × 27 cm (courtesy of DNMCH, OHG 902; photo the authors) strap of his gun, while the other arm is bent to cushion his head. The reclining posture and closed eyes are more suggestive of a sleeping figure than the suffering of a fallen man.
Recommended publications
  • Early History of South Africa
    THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTH AFRICA EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES . .3 SOUTH AFRICA: THE EARLY INHABITANTS . .5 THE KHOISAN . .6 The San (Bushmen) . .6 The Khoikhoi (Hottentots) . .8 BLACK SETTLEMENT . .9 THE NGUNI . .9 The Xhosa . .10 The Zulu . .11 The Ndebele . .12 The Swazi . .13 THE SOTHO . .13 The Western Sotho . .14 The Southern Sotho . .14 The Northern Sotho (Bapedi) . .14 THE VENDA . .15 THE MASHANGANA-TSONGA . .15 THE MFECANE/DIFAQANE (Total war) Dingiswayo . .16 Shaka . .16 Dingane . .18 Mzilikazi . .19 Soshangane . .20 Mmantatise . .21 Sikonyela . .21 Moshweshwe . .22 Consequences of the Mfecane/Difaqane . .23 Page 1 EUROPEAN INTERESTS The Portuguese . .24 The British . .24 The Dutch . .25 The French . .25 THE SLAVES . .22 THE TREKBOERS (MIGRATING FARMERS) . .27 EUROPEAN OCCUPATIONS OF THE CAPE British Occupation (1795 - 1803) . .29 Batavian rule 1803 - 1806 . .29 Second British Occupation: 1806 . .31 British Governors . .32 Slagtersnek Rebellion . .32 The British Settlers 1820 . .32 THE GREAT TREK Causes of the Great Trek . .34 Different Trek groups . .35 Trichardt and Van Rensburg . .35 Andries Hendrik Potgieter . .35 Gerrit Maritz . .36 Piet Retief . .36 Piet Uys . .36 Voortrekkers in Zululand and Natal . .37 Voortrekker settlement in the Transvaal . .38 Voortrekker settlement in the Orange Free State . .39 THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS AND GOLD . .41 Page 2 EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES Humankind had its earliest origins in Africa The introduction of iron changed the African and the story of life in South Africa has continent irrevocably and was a large step proven to be a micro-study of life on the forwards in the development of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Lecture
    THE JAMES BACKHOUSE LECTURE 2001 RECONCILING OPPOSITES: REFLECTIONS ON PEACEMAKING IN SOUTH AFRICA Hendrik W van der Merwe The James Backhouse Lectures The lectures were instituted by Australia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) on the its establishment of that Yearly Meeting in 1964. James Backhouse and his companion, George Washington Walker were English Friends who visited Australia from 1832 to 1838. They travelled widely, but spent most of their time in Tasmania. It was through their visit that Quaker Meetings were first established in Australia. Coming to Australia under a concern for the conditions of convicts, the two men had access to people with authority in the young colonies, and with influence in Britain, both in Parliament and in the social reform movement. In meticulous reports and personal letters, they made practical suggestions and urged legislative action on penal reform, on the rum trade, and on land rights and the treatment of Aborigines. James Backhouse was a general naturalist and a botanist. He made careful observations and published full accounts of what he saw, in addition to encouraging Friends in the colonies and following the deep concern that had brought him to Australia. Australian Friends hope that this series of Lectures will bring fresh insights into the Truth, and speak to the needs and aspirations of Australian Quakerism. This particular lecture was delivered in Melbourne on 8 January 2001, during the annual meeting of the Society. Colin Wendell-Smith Presiding Clerk Australia Yearly Meeting © Copyright 2001 by the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Australia Incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • MA Semester IV- History of South Africa 1850-1950 (HISKM 16) Dr
    MA Semester IV- History of South Africa 1850-1950 (HISKM 16) Dr. Mukesh Kumar UNIT-I Early European presence in the cape 1650-1800- The first Europeans to enter Southern Africa were the Portuguese, who from the 15th century edged their way around the African coast in the hope of outflanking Islam, finding a sea route to the riches of India, and discovering additional sources of food. They reached the Kongo Kingdom in northwestern Angola in 1482–83; early in 1488 Bartolomeu Dias rounded the southern tip of the continent; and just over a decade later Vasco da Gama sailed along the east coast of Africa before striking out to India. Although the voyages were initially unpromising, they marked the beginning of the integration of the subcontinent into the new world economy and the dominance of Europeans over the indigenous inhabitants. The Portuguese in west-central Africa Portuguese influence in west-central Africa radiated over a far wider area and was much more dramatic and destructive than on the east coast. Initially the Portuguese crown and Jesuit missionaries forged peaceful links with the kingdom of the Kongo, converting its king to Christianity. Almost immediately, however, slave traders followed in the wake of priests and teachers, and west- central Africa became tied to the demands of the Sao Tome sugar planters and the transatlantic slave trade. Until 1560 the Kongo kings had an effective monopoly in west-central Africa over trade with metropolitan Portugal, which showed relatively little interest in its African possessions. By the 1520s, however, Afro-Portuguese traders and landowners from Sao Tomé were intervening in the affairs of the Ndongo kingdom to the south, supporting the ruler, or ngola, in his military campaigns and taking his war captives and surplus dependents as slaves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Self-Determination: a Comparative Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism Among the Quebecois and the Afrikaners
    The Struggle for Self-Determination: A Comparative Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism Among the Quebecois and the Afrikaners By: Allison Down This thesis is presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the University of Stellenbosch. Supervisor: Professor Simon B. Bekker Date Submitted: December, 1999 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I, the undersigned hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any university for a degree. Signature Date Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract This thesis examines the structural factors that precipitate the emergence of ethnicity and nationalism, with a special emphasis on ethno-Iinguistic identity. Nationalist momentum leading to self-determination is also addressed. A historical comparative study of the Quebecois of Canada and the Afrikaners of South Africa is presented. The ancestors of both the Quebecois and the Afrikaners left Europe (France and the Netherlands, respectively) to establish a new colony. Having disassociated themselves from their European homeland, they each developed a new, more relevant identity for themselves, one which was also vis-a-vis the indigenous population. Both cultures were marked by a rural agrarian existence, a high degree of religiosity, and a high level of Church involvement in the state. Then both were conquered by the British and expected to conform to the English-speaking order. This double-layer of colonialism proved to be a significant contributing factor to the ethnic identity and consciousness of the Quebecois and the Afrikaners, as they perceived a threat to their language and their cultural institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Century Tragedy, Victory, and Divine Providence As the Foundations of an Afrikaner National Identity
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History Spring 5-7-2011 19th Century Tragedy, Victory, and Divine Providence as the Foundations of an Afrikaner National Identity Kevin W. Hudson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hudson, Kevin W., "19th Century Tragedy, Victory, and Divine Providence as the Foundations of an Afrikaner National Identity." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/45 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 19TH CENTURY TRAGEDY, VICTORY, AND DIVINE PROVIDENCE AS THE FOUNDATIONS OF AN AFRIKANER NATIONAL IDENTITY by KEVIN W. HUDSON Under the DireCtion of Dr. Mohammed Hassen Ali and Dr. Jared Poley ABSTRACT Apart from a sense of racial superiority, which was certainly not unique to white Cape colonists, what is clear is that at the turn of the nineteenth century, Afrikaners were a disparate group. Economically, geographically, educationally, and religiously they were by no means united. Hierarchies existed throughout all cross sections of society. There was little political consciousness and no sense of a nation. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century they had developed a distinct sense of nationalism, indeed of a volk [people; ethnicity] ordained by God. The objective of this thesis is to identify and analyze three key historical events, the emotional sentiments evoked by these nationalistic milestones, and the evolution of a unified Afrikaner identity that would ultimately be used to justify the abhorrent system of apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Presentation of the Bible to Jacobus Uys (April 1837) A2/A3
    2 Presentation of the Bible to Jacobus Uys (April 1837) A2/A3 B2 C2 D N 2 Presentation 26 27 1 25 2 East wall, north-east projection (panel 3/31) 24 3 h. 2.3 × w. 2.4 m 4 23 Sculptor of clay maquette: Hennie Potgieter 22 5 Stages of production A1 W.H. Coetzer, pencil drawing, retained only in A2 (April–June 1937) 21 A2 Reproduction of A1 (June 1937) 6 A3 W.H. Coetzer, revised pencil drawing A1, h. 13.3 × w. 15.3 cm 20 (after September 1937) 7 Annotation: ‘Oorhandiging van Bybel aan Uys’ 19 (Handing over of Bible to Uys) 8 18 B1 One-third-scale clay maquette, not extant but replicated in B2 (1942–43) 17 9 B2 One-third-scale plaster maquette, h. 79 × w. 76 × d. 10.4 cm (1942–43) 16 10 C1 Full-scale wooden armature, not extant (1943–46) 15 14 13 12 11 C2 Full-scale clay relief, not extant but recorded in photograph; replicated in C3 (1943–46) 0 5 10 m C3 Full-scale plaster relief (1943–46), not extant but copied in D (late 1947–49) D Marble as installed in the Monument (1949) Early records SVK minutes (4.9.1937) ― item 4b (see below, ‘Developing the design’) Wenke (c. 1934–36) ― item VI. SEN. F.S. MALAN, 3 ‘Tweede toneel: Aanbieding van Bybel te Grahamstad aan Voortrekker Uys’ (Second scene: Presentation of Bible at Grahamstown to Voortrekker Uys) Moerdyk Layout (5.10.1936–15.1.1937) ― scene 2 on panel 5/31 ‘Bybel en Uys’ (Bible and Uys) Jansen Memorandum (19.1.1937) ― item 7.2 ‘The English inhabitants presenting Uys with a Bible before his departure’ Open Access.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Hale, Stellenbosch University
    26 FREDERICK HALE, STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY Heroism, Tragedy, and the Failure of Historicity in Anna de Villiers' Die Wit Kraai Since the 1890s the heroism of individual well entrenched in the case of those like Voortrekkers and of these emigrating Boers Retief and Maritz who had fallen at the generally has been a hallmark of fictional hands of Zulu foes. reconstructions of the Great Trek, especially More challenging, however, was the task those written in Dutch and Afrikaans, and of enthroning in the pantheon of indeed it has also left its mark on those Voortrekker leaders those whose place in which English-speaking writers have history was ambiguous. Hendrik Potgieter contributed to this sub-genre. This for instance, was widely known to have ' generalisation is particularly applicable to been autocratic and frequently at odds with works intended for the cultural and moral other trek chieftains. In the present article I edification of young Afrikaners, as I have shall consider how Anna de Villiers, an emphasised in earlier studies (Hale 1999a, Afrikaans female litterateur who was Hale 1999b). During the first four decades steeped in Afrikaner nationalism, tackled the ofthe twentieth century, the authors of such challenge in her novel of 1938, Die Wit books relied heavily on the heroic image of Kraai, of constructing the tragedy of Hans the Voortrekkers which such trail-blazing de Lange, a once-respected Voortrekker Afrikaner nationalists as Gustav Preller scout who, after settling in Natal and. meticulously constructed in the wake of the becoming a well-established farmer, became emotionally burdensome defeat in the one of the first Europeans in southern Africa Second Anglo-Boer War.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nation at Prayer, a Nation in Hate: Apartheid in South Africa Tamara Rice Lave University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 1994 A Nation at Prayer, a Nation in Hate: Apartheid in South Africa Tamara Rice Lave University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Tamara Rice Lave, A Nation at Prayer, a Nation in Hate: Apartheid in South Africa 30 483 (1994). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes A Nation at Prayer, a Nation in Hate: Apartheid in South Africa TAMARA RICE LAVE* Daniel Malan, a minister of the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC)Q 1 and former Prime Minister of South Africa, declared in 1948:2 Our history is the greatest masterpiece of the centuries. We hold this nationhood as our due for it was given us by the Architect of the universe. [His] aim was the formation of a new nation among the nations of the world .... The last hundred years have witnessed a miracle behind which must lie a divine plan. Indeed, the history of the Afrikaner reveals a will and a determination which makes one feel that * J.D. candidate, 1995, Stanford Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Voortrekker Monumwent Tapestries
    ART. GENDER IDEOLOGY AND AFRIKANER NATIONALISM: A mSTORY OF THE VQORTREKKERVOORTREKKER MONUMENT TAPESTRIES University of Cape Town Liese van decWattder Watt Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Cape Town January 1996 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town ABSTRACT This dissertation considers the role both verbal and visual cultureplayed in the growth and articulation of Afrikanernationalism. For thisreasonit focuses notonly on the centraltopic underdiscussion, namely the Voortrekker tapestries, butalsoonthediscourses thatinformed the production of these tapestries and the circumstances surrounding the decision to commission them. The Voortrekker tapestries werecommissioned in 1952 by the Vrou-en Moederbeweging van die A1XV (Suid-Afrikaanse Spoorwee en Hawens) and presented to the Voortrekker Monument in 1960. It wasdecided that the tapestries should depict the GreatTrek of 1838 and, dueto his widely acclaimed statusas anauthorityon visual representations of Afrikaner history and culture, the artist WI! Coetzer was approached to be the designer of the tapestries. But Coelzer's version of the Great Trek of 1838 perpetuates many popular myths
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 1 Afrikaners in Natal Up
    University of Pretoria etd – Wassermann, J M (2005) 1 CHAPTER 1 AFRIKANERS IN NATAL UP TO THE OUTBREAK OF THE ANGLO-BOER WAR: EXPERIENCES AND ATTITUDES PREVALENT AT THE TIME By the late 1870s, Natal constituted the only European political entity in South Africa in which Afrikaners formed a minority group amongst the white inhabitants. This community was shaped by events spanning half a century which included: living under British rule in the Cape Colony, embarking on the Great Trek, experiencing strained relations and subsequent military engagements with the Zulu, marked especially by the Battle of Blood River on 16 December 1838, witnessing the creation of the Republic of Natalia and its subsequent annexation and destruction by the British after the Battle of Congella in 1843.1 The cycle was completed when Colonial rule was instituted in 18452 and the subsequent attempt in1847 by Natal Afrikaners to resurrect a republic, the Republic of Klip River, failed.3 The Afrikaners who remained in Natal throughout these events increased in number as immigrants from the Cape Colony joined them,4 and slowly evolved into a united community, trapped in an agrarian economy.5 Their socio-political world was characterised by complaints of preferential treatment afforded to Africans, and a lack of access to land. A predominant sense of injustice prevailed, exemplified by acts such as the execution of Hans Dons de Lange,6 and the community experienced a general feeling of disempowerment and unfair treatment under British rule. They had no voice to express their feelings of dissatisfaction since Dutch newspapers had not proved profitable,7 Dutch had become a marginalised language,8 and the Nederduits Gereformeerde Kerk or Dutch Reformed Church (hereafter DRC) which was caught up in a constant struggle for survival, both financially and in terms of recruiting members, lacked power.9 As a result, by the early 1870s, the Boshof(f) brothers, JN and JC, were the only Afrikaner members of the Natal Legislative 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Trek Text.Indd
    Th e Great Trek UNCUT Escape from British Rule: Th e Boer Exodus from the Cape Colony, 1836 Robin Binckes 30° South Publishers (Pty) Ltd. Helion & Company Ltd. Contents List of maps 11 List of illustrations 12 Acknowledgements 14 Author’s note 15 Chapter 1: The Portuguese search for the land of milk and honey 17 San—Prester John—Batholomeu Dias—voyages of exploration— Khoikhoi—death of de Almeida Chapter 2: British flirtation with the Cape 33 Secret route—English East India Company—trade with the Khoikhoi— Core—the Cape as a penal colony—Britain claims the Cape— Harry—the Haarlem Chapter 3: Second chance for Van Riebeeck 45 Van Riebeeck arrives—starvation—Eva—slavery—Doman— free burghers—first Khoikhoi–Dutch war—Van Meerhof—Trekboers— the Castle—Van Qaelberg—French annexation and European wars— second Khoikhoi war Chapter 4: Reaching the land of the Xhosa 66 Simon van der Stel—establishment of law and order— exploring the interior—Stavenisse—land of the Xhosa—Rolihlahla Chapter 5: The birth of the Trekboers 78 French Huguenots—Khoikhoi wars—Klaas—Willem van der Stel— trade restrictions lifted—Trekboers—clash of the Xhosa and Trekboers— corruption and privilige—Adam Tas—rebellion—smallpox— commando system—660 men drown in Table Bay— death of Noordt—Chief Phalo—Barbier’s execution— loan farms—Tulbagh—Meermin—Van Plettenberg Chapter 6: Corruption and discontent 99 Trekboers move on—shoot to kill—Van Jaarsveld—tobacco massacre— First Frontier War—boundaries pushed—Xhosa resistance—Maynier— abandonement of farms—Coenraad de Buys—Second Frontier
    [Show full text]
  • Unfair “Affirmative Action” in South African Historiography
    F Pretorius Unfair “affi rmative action” in South African historiography Unfair “affirmative action” in South African historiography Fransjohan Pretorius University of Pretoria I have some concern that the Afrikaner does not fi gure in the “New His- tory” books on South African history, except as the scapegoat and the villain. Th e Afrikaner is ignored particularly in the historiography cov- ering the nineteenth century. For most non-Afrikaans historians South African history has become the suff ering, struggle and eventual victory of the suppressed masses, that is, African or black history – the African struggle. Afrikaners are judged and condemned in negative terms. Just like there was a “native problem” in Afrikaner national historiography, there is now an “Afrikaner problem”. Th e Afrikaner has achieved noth- ing positive in the history of South Africa. Th e pendulum has indeed swung to the other side. For the victor reconciliation seems to mean that the view of the majority has triumphed. Th ere is no room for other views beside the “offi cial” view. Th is intolerant new view on history is nowhere better illustrated than in a series of six history books published by the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation with the overall title of Turning points in history.1 And do not underestimate the impact of this series. In the latest matricu- lation examination paper for history (higher grade, October/Novem- ber 2005) of the National Department of Education it was expected of learners to comment on an extract from Turning points in history.2 Th e planning of the Turning point series was launched with commend- able goals, judging from the point of departure expressed by the chair- person of the editorial committee, Professor Bill Nasson.
    [Show full text]