Standard Operating Procedure 14 (Version 1.3)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Standard Operating Procedure 14 (Version 1.3) Victorian Forest Monitoring Program Standard Operating Procedure 14 (version 1.3) Measuring the Small Tree Plot Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, September 2013. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2013. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Print managed by Finsbury Green, May 2013. ISBN 978-1-74326-701-1 (pdf) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone DEPI Customer Service Centre136186, email [email protected] via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.depi.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Contents Overview 2 Glossary of definitions 2 Equipment list 2 Procedure 3 Mark out Small Tree Plot 3 Check borderline trees 3 Identify and count each tree 3 Data and information recording 3 Complete the Identification section at the top of the Small Tree Plot Form 3 Complete the Small Tree Count section of the Small Tree Plot Form 4 Record any comments 4 Appendix 14.1 Laying out the Small tree plot 5 Appendix 14.2 Tree species list 6 Appendix 14.3 Sample Small Tree Plot Form 10 Standard Operating Procedure 14: Measuring the Small Tree Plot (version 1.3) 1 Overview This SOP describes the tasks required to establish, mark out and measure a Small Tree Plot. Glossary of definitions Diameter at Breast Height (DBH): the diameter of a tree measured at 1.3m above ground. For the purpose of ground plot measurement, DBH implies diameter measured outside or over bark (DBHOB). On sloping ground breast height is measured on the uphill side of the tree. Field Form: A data collection form for recording measurements and other information. This form may be in one of four formats: Hardcopy (paper – printed from MS Excel format), Electronic - MS Excel, Electronic - MS Access Database or an electronic data capture tool developed for VFMP. Plant Growth Form: Classification based on plant structure and growth dynamics. E.g. trees, vines, grasses, forbs etc. Point of Germination: Point at which tree seedling takes root and becomes established. For lignotubers or coppicing stumps, the point at which the stem has originated on the original stump. Sample Point Location: Point established in the field using differential GPS, on or very close to the Sample Point. Sample Point Location Stake: Stake on or offset from the Sample Point Location – which marks the site of the Sample Point Location. Small Tree: A tree with an actual size less than 10 cm DBH and greater than 1.3 m in height. This definition determines which field form is used to record data, and does not correspond with Plant Growth Form. Small Tree Plot (STP): 0.005 ha circular plot within which detailed small tree data and information is collected. The centre of the STP occurs at the Sample Point Location and the Sample Point Location Stake unless the stake is off-set. Small Tree Plot Form: Field Form used for recording STP measurement data and information. Tree: Any species with its Plant Growth Form listed in the Flora Information System (FIS) as LT (Large Tree), T (Large Shrub to Medium Tree) or MT (Mallee Tree). These Growth Form categories are based on potential size, not actual. Note that tree ferns are not considered to be 'trees' in this classification. Equipment list Tape measure or a height pole extended horizontally to 3.99 m Tape measure (50m) Field form Diameter tape Calculator Compass Clinometer Field First Aid Kit Field notebook Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) Standard Operating Procedure 14: Measuring the Small Tree Plot (version 1.3) 2 Victorian Forest Monitoring Program Procedure Mark out Small Tree Plot: The Sample Point Location (which is also the Stake location unless the Stake is offset), marks the centre of the Small Tree Plot (STP). SOP 11: Establishing and Marking Sample Point Location, describes the procedure for establishing and marking out the Sample Point Location. Standing at the Sample Point Location Stake, measure the boundary of the Small Tree Plot (STP) using a tape measure or a height pole extended to 3.99 m. Measure horizontally and not along the ground to avoid the need for slope correction. Sweep the height pole (if there are few stems) or temporarily mark the STP boundary using pigtail stakes. Alternatively "lasso" the tape measure around all small trees in the STP. Check borderline trees: Check the distance from the Sample Point Location to all trees within 1 m of the STP boundary. Measure to the estimated point of germination on both sides of the tree, and average the result. Measure a tree with its point of germination inside the boundary even if it leaning outside. Conversely, do not measure a tree leaning into the plot, but with its point of germination outside the LTP border. Refer to Appendix 14.1, Figure 14.1.1 for examples of borderline trees. Identify and count each tree: Identify and count each living (standing or fallen) or dead (standing or ‘hung up’ only) small tree of < 10 cm DBH AND ≥ 1.3 m height with its point of germination inside the radius of the STP. Identify species using standard botanical features, such as buds, fruit, bark type and juvenile leaves (for eucalypts). For each tree assign a tree species according to Appendix 14.2, Table 14.2.1. Do not include species that are not in this list and contact the DSE project leader if an error in the list is encountered. Check height is greater than 1.3m. From point of germination to tip, along the lean of the tree if the tree is leaning. Use a diameter tape or callipers to check DBH is less than 10 cm. Refer to Appendix 14.1, Figure 14.2.1 for further information. Count individual stems separately for small trees with more than one stem below breast height. A stem must be distinct leader and at least 50% of the diameter of the main stem. Refer to SOP 13 Appendix 13.3, Figure 13.3.3 for further information. Include coppice stems. Include live epicormics below 1.3m on dead standing large trees – see sop 13 Include small dead trees that are "hung up" on other trees and cannot fall to the ground. Do not include fallen dead small trees. For each unidentifiable species, follow the procedures outlined in SOP 20A: Plant Specimen Collection and Identification Procedures to collect specimens and to record ancillary information such as juvenile leaves, mature leaves, bark type etc. Create a temporary descriptive name that is unique to each specimen collected. This name should include two or more descriptors, for example, “Hairy grey daisy”. Once a specimen is collected and a temporary name assigned, the name can be re-used on the Small Tree Plot Form for any tree of similar appearance. Data and information recording Complete the Identification section at the top of the Small Tree Plot Form: Fill in the Sample Point Identification Code, Bioregion, the SOP version number, Date, Contractor Company Name and the Names of each Contractor Field Crew member present, in the <sample_point_ID>, <bioregion>, <SOP Standard Operating Procedure 14: Measuring the Small Tree Plot (version 1.3) 3 Victorian Forest Monitoring Program version>, <date> and <contractor_company> fields. Against each <field_crew_member_number> fill in the Contractor Field Crew member surname <field_crew_member_surname> and first name <field_crew_member_firstname>. The Contractor Field Crew Leader should be the first name recorded in the Identification section of the form. Enter “y” in the <Scribe> field against the crew member who enters information on the form. Complete the Small Tree Count section of the Small Tree Plot Form: Enter the species name for each live and dead species within the STP in the <Species Name> field. Give unidentifiable species a descriptive name in the <Species Name> field. Enter “y” in the <Temporary name (y)> field. Record the count of the living and dead trees in the <Live count> and <Dead count> fields. Sum the number of living and dead trees for each species and record in the <Total> field. If there are no small trees within the Small Tree Plot, enter “y” in the <No small trees present> field. Record any comments: Record any additional information relating to the plot in the <Comments> field. Refer to the example form shown in Appendix 14.3 Figure 14.3.1. Version (current) Version (previous) Author Date Summary of changes 1.0 KT22 19/05/10 Nb29 22/06/2010 Minor changes made to body of SOP. Form redone to reflect changes made to all forms. NB29 16/08/2010 Example form inserted 1.1 1.0 mw0a 04/07/2011 Amendments made post field season 1 1.2 1.1 cj37 06/08/2012 General editing and formatting; Plant Growth Form defined; check distance to borderline trees on both sides of stem; Field Form check no longer required; Defined stem proportion for multi-stemmed trees; Included live fallen trees in count; Tree Species Reference Table updated; 1.3 1.2 AC52 15/05/2013 Include definition of tree ht for leaning trees, include epicormics on dead large trees, minor edits Endorsed Date 18/09/2013 Name: Peter Chronopoulos Position: Manager, Information Management, Evaluation and Reporting Division/Branch: Knowledge and Governance Branch, Land Management Policy Division Standard Operating Procedure 14: Measuring the Small Tree Plot (version 1.3) 4 Victorian Forest Monitoring Program Appendix 14.1 Laying out the Small tree plot Figure 14.1.1: Examples of borderline trees PLOT PLOT PLOT ‘Outside’ plot ‘Inside’ plot ‘Inside’ plot Not included Included Included Figure 14.1.2: Examples of DBH measurements DBH Measurement DBH Measurement DBH Measurement 1.3m 1.3m 1.
Recommended publications
  • Winter Edition 2020 - 3 in This Issue: Office Bearers for 2017
    1 Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 Armidale NSW 2350 web: www.austplants.com.au/Armidale e-mail: [email protected] Crowea exalata ssp magnifolia image by Maria Hitchcock Winter Edition 2020 - 3 In this issue: Office bearers for 2017 ......p1 Editorial …...p2Error! Bookmark not defined. New Website Arrangements .…..p3 Solstice Gathering ......p4 Passion, Boers & Hibiscus ......p5 Wollomombi Falls Lookout ......p7 Hard Yakka ......p8 Torrington & Gibraltar after fires ......p9 Small Eucalypts ......p12 Drought tolerance of plants ......p15 Armidale & District Group PO Box 735, Armidale NSW 2350 President: Vacant Vice President: Colin Wilson Secretary: Penelope Sinclair Ph. 6771 5639 [email protected] Treasurer: Phil Rose Ph. 6775 3767 [email protected] Membership: Phil Rose [email protected] 2 Markets in the Mall, Outings, OHS & Environmental Officer and Arboretum Coordinator: Patrick Laher Ph: 0427327719 [email protected] Newsletter Editor: John Nevin Ph: 6775218 [email protected],net.au Meet and Greet: Lee Horsley Ph: 0421381157 [email protected] Afternoon tea: Deidre Waters Ph: 67753754 [email protected] Web Master: Eric Sinclair Our website: http://www.austplants.com.au From the Editor: We have certainly had a memorable year - the worst drought in living memory followed by the most extensive bushfires seen in Australia, and to top it off, the biggest pandemic the world has seen in 100 years. The pandemic has made essential self distancing and quarantining to arrest the spread of the Corona virus. As a result, most APS activities have been shelved for the time being. Being in isolation at home has been a mixed blessing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cool Temperate Mixed Forest Investigation Report
    INVESTIGATION REPORT COOL TEMPERATE RAINFOREST & MIXED FOREST RAINFOREST SITE OF SIGNIFICANCE (EG85 - Hensleigh - Far Creek) COAST RANGE ROAD VicForests Logging coupe 886-509-0012 Abstract Sections of VicForests scheduled logging coupe 886-509-0012 were investigated to assess the presence and extent of Cool Temperate Rainforest and Cool Temperate Mixed Forest communities. Areas of Cool Temperate Rainforest were identified within coupe 886-509-0012. These areas of the study location were readily identified by the presence of rainforest character species and the comparative structural composition of these stands to those expected to be found in mature rainforest. Cool Temperate Mixed Forest (Mixed Forest) areas of the study location within coupe 886-509- 0012 were identified by noting the presence of characteristic Mixed Forest species including in their formation of a multi-layer structured community comprised of Mixed Forest character species of an advanced age class, the presence of cool temperate rainforest character and differential species, and the topographic contiguity and relative proximity between the Mixed Forest areas within coupe 886-509- 0012 and the extant Mixed Forest clearly identifiable in the adjacent forest areas immediately to the north of coupe 886-509-0012 across Coast Range Road in the Errinundra National Park. This investigation also notes that coupe 886-509-0012 is located within a “Rainforest Site of Significance” (EG85 - Hensleigh - Far Creek). Recommendations are made to the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) and to VicForests to ensure that all areas of Cool Temperate Rainforest and Mixed Forest are excluded from logging and that no further logging is undertaken within the “Rainforest Site of Significance”.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Phyllode Variation in Acacia Verniciflua and A. Leprosa
    CSIRO PUBLISHING www.publish.csiro.au/journals/asb Australian Systematic Botany 18, 383–398 An investigation of phyllode variation in Acacia verniciflua and A. leprosa (Mimosaceae), and implications for taxonomy Stuart K. GardnerA, Daniel J. MurphyB,C, Edward NewbiginA, Andrew N. DrinnanA and Pauline Y. LadigesA ASchool of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Private Bag 2000, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Acacia verniciflua A.Cunn. and A. leprosa Sieber ex DC. are believed to be closely related, although strict interpretation of the current sectional classification of subgenus Phyllodineae places them in separate sections based on main nerve number. Six populations, comprised of the common and the southern variants of A. verniciflua and the large phyllode variant of A. leprosa, were sampled to test the value of nerve number as a taxonomic character and the current delimitation of these geographically variable species. Morphometrics, microscopy and the AFLP technique were used to compare and contrast populations. Phyllode nerve development was investigated and the abaxial nerve was found to be homologous with the mid-rib of a simple leaf. Three taxa were differentiated, two that are consistently two-nerved and one taxon that is variably one-nerved, two-nerved or both within a single plant. The first two-nerved taxon, characterised by smaller phyllodes, matches the type specimen of A. verniciflua. The second two-nerved taxon, characterised by large phyllodes, is apparently endemic to Mt William. The third taxon, with variable main nerve number, also has large phyllodes, and combines large phyllode variant A.
    [Show full text]
  • Honey and Pollen Flora of SE Australia Species
    List of families - genus/species Page Acanthaceae ........................................................................................................................................................................34 Avicennia marina grey mangrove 34 Aizoaceae ............................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum ice plant 35 Alliaceae ................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Allium cepa onions 36 Amaranthaceae ..................................................................................................................................................................37 Ptilotus species foxtails 37 Anacardiaceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Schinus molle var areira pepper tree 38 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper tree 39 Apiaceae .................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Daucus carota carrot 40 Foeniculum vulgare fennel 41 Araliaceae ................................................................................................................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Resistance and Susceptibility Stock List
    Currently known status of the following plants to Phytophthora species - pathogenic water moulds from the Agricultural Pathology & Kingdom Protista. Biological Farming Service C ompiled by Dr Mary Cole, Agpath P/L. Agricultural Consultants since 1980 S=susceptible; MS=moderately susceptible; T= tolerant; MT=moderately tolerant; ?=no information available. Phytophthora status Life Form Botanical Name Family Common Name Susceptible (S) Tolerant (T) Unknown (UnK) Shrub Acacia brownii Mimosaceae Heath Wattle MS Tree Acacia dealbata Mimosaceae Silver Wattle T Shrub Acacia genistifolia Mimosaceae Spreading Wattle MS Tree Acacia implexa Mimosaceae Lightwood MT Tree Acacia leprosa Mimosaceae Cinnamon Wattle ? Tree Acacia mearnsii Mimosaceae Black Wattle MS Tree Acacia melanoxylon Mimosaceae Blackwood MT Tree Acacia mucronata Mimosaceae Narrow Leaf Wattle S Tree Acacia myrtifolia Mimosaceae Myrtle Wattle S Shrub Acacia myrtifolia Mimosaceae Myrtle Wattle S Tree Acacia obliquinervia Mimosaceae Mountain Hickory Wattle ? Shrub Acacia oxycedrus Mimosaceae Spike Wattle S Shrub Acacia paradoxa Mimosaceae Hedge Wattle MT Tree Acacia pycnantha Mimosaceae Golden Wattle S Shrub Acacia sophorae Mimosaceae Coast Wattle S Shrub Acacia stricta Mimosaceae Hop Wattle ? Shrubs Acacia suaveolens Mimosaceae Sweet Wattle S Tree Acacia ulicifolia Mimosaceae Juniper Wattle S Shrub Acacia verniciflua Mimosaceae Varnish wattle S Shrub Acacia verticillata Mimosaceae Prickly Moses ? Groundcover Acaena novae-zelandiae Rosaceae Bidgee-Widgee T Tree Allocasuarina littoralis Casuarinaceae Black Sheoke S Tree Allocasuarina paludosa Casuarinaceae Swamp Sheoke S Tree Allocasuarina verticillata Casuarinaceae Drooping Sheoak S Sedge Amperea xipchoclada Euphorbaceae Broom Spurge S Grass Amphibromus neesii Poaceae Swamp Wallaby Grass ? Shrub Aotus ericoides Papillionaceae Common Aotus S Groundcover Apium prostratum Apiaceae Sea Celery MS Herb Arthropodium milleflorum Asparagaceae Pale Vanilla Lily S? Herb Arthropodium strictum Asparagaceae Chocolate Lily S? Shrub Atriplex paludosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Acacia Vernicifluaand A. Leprosa
    A taxonomic revision of Acacia verniciflua and A. leprosa (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) in Australia Bruce R. Maslin 1 and Daniel J. Murphy 2 1 Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] 2 National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Victoria 3141, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Abstract Acacia verniciflua (Varnish Wattle) and A. leprosa (Cinnamon Wattle) A revision of a taxonomically complex occur in temperate areas of eastern and southern Australia and as group of species allied to, and including, Acacia leprosa Sieber ex DC. hitherto defined were regarded as highly polymorphic species in need of and A. verniciflua A.Cunn. is presented. critical revision (Maslin 2001). The conventional separation between the These species predominate in species was the number of longitudinal nerves on their phyllodes, one in temperate regions of eastern Australia. A. leprosa and two in A. verniciflua, but as correctly noted by Court (1972, Two new species are described, p. 219), the importance of this character has been over-emphasised. A. rostriformis Maslin & D.J.Murphy and A. stictophylla Court ex Maslin During the nineteenth century a number of taxa were described that & D.J.Murphy and one, A. exudans were referable to the A. verniciflua– A. leprosa group, however, none Lindl., is resurrected. Acacia leprosa is of these names was ever taken up, presumably because of difficulties treated as a highly polymorphic species in defining the taxa and uncertainties concerning the application of comprising five varieties, four of which the names (some of which were based on plants cultivated in Europe are described as new, namely, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Diversity and Contrasted Evolution of Cytoplasmic Genomes in Flowering Plants :A Phylogenomic Approach in Oleaceae Celine Van De Paer
    Structural diversity and contrasted evolution of cytoplasmic genomes in flowering plants :a phylogenomic approach in Oleaceae Celine van de Paer To cite this version: Celine van de Paer. Structural diversity and contrasted evolution of cytoplasmic genomes in flowering plants : a phylogenomic approach in Oleaceae. Vegetal Biology. Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III, 2017. English. NNT : 2017TOU30228. tel-02325872 HAL Id: tel-02325872 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02325872 Submitted on 22 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. REMERCIEMENTS Remerciements Mes premiers remerciements s'adressent à mon directeur de thèse GUILLAUME BESNARD. Tout d'abord, merci Guillaume de m'avoir proposé ce sujet de thèse sur la famille des Oleaceae. Merci pour ton enthousiasme et ta passion pour la recherche qui m'ont véritablement portée pendant ces trois années. C'était un vrai plaisir de travailler à tes côtés. Moi qui étais focalisée sur les systèmes de reproduction chez les plantes, tu m'as ouvert à un nouveau domaine de la recherche tout aussi intéressant qui est l'évolution moléculaire (même si je suis loin de maîtriser tous les concepts...). Tu as toujours été bienveillant et à l'écoute, je t'en remercie.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Communities of Mt Barrow & Mt Barrow Falls
    PLANT COMMUNITIES OF MT BARROW & MT BARROW FALLS John B. Davies Margaret J. Davies Consultant Queen Victoria and Art and Plomley Foundation II Mt Barrow J.B. & M.J. (1990) of Mt Barrow and Mt Barrow No.2 © Queen Victoria and Art Wellington St., Launceston,Tasmania 1990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 BACKGROUND 4 SURVEY MT BARROW 11 OF MT BARROW PLANT COMMUNITIES 14 AND THEIR RESERVATION COMPARISON THE VEGETATION AT 30 BARROW AND LOMOND BOTANICAL OF MT BARROW RESERVE 31 DESCRIPTION THE COMMUNITIES BARROW FALLS THEIR APPENDIX 1 36 APPENDIX 2­ MAP 3 39 APPENDIX 4 APPENDIX 5 APPENDIX 6­ SPECIES 49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to a number of people for assistance with this project. Firstly administrative assistance was by the Director of the Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Mr Chris TasselL assistance was Michael Body, Kath Craig Reid and Mary Cameron. crt>''Y'it>,nt" are also due to Telecom for providing a key to the on the plateau, the Department of Lands, Parks and for providing a transparency base map of the area, and to Mr Mike Brouder and Mr John Harris Commission), for the use of 1 :20,000 colour aerial photographs of the area. Taxonomic was provided by Cameron (Honorary Research Associate, Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery) who also mounted all the plant collected, and various staff of the Tasmanian Herbarium particularly Mr Alex Dr Tony Orchard, Mr D. 1. Morris and Dr Winifred Curtis. thanks are due to Dr Brad Potts (Botany Department, of Tasmania) for assistance with data and table production and to Prof Kirkpatrick and Environmental ..J'U'U'~;'" of Tasmania) for the use and word-processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasion and Management of a Woody Plant, Lantana Camara L., Alters Vegetation Diversity Within Wet Sclerophyll Forest in Southeastern Australia
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2009 Invasion and management of a woody plant, Lantana camara L., alters vegetation diversity within wet sclerophyll forest in southeastern Australia Ben Gooden University of Wollongong, [email protected] Kris French University of Wollongong, [email protected] Peter J. Turner Department of Environment and Climate Change, NSW Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Gooden, Ben; French, Kris; and Turner, Peter J.: Invasion and management of a woody plant, Lantana camara L., alters vegetation diversity within wet sclerophyll forest in southeastern Australia 2009. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/4953 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Invasion and management of a woody plant, Lantana camara L., alters vegetation diversity within wet sclerophyll forest in southeastern Australia Abstract Plant invasions of natural communities are commonly associated with reduced species diversity and altered ecosystem structure and function. This study investigated the effects of invasion and management of the woody shrub Lantana camara (lantana) in wet sclerophyll forest on the south-east coast of Australia. The effects of L. camara invasion and management on resident vegetation diversity and recruitment were determined as well as if invader management initiated community recovery. Vascular plant species richness, abundance and composition were surveyed and compared across L.
    [Show full text]
  • Lomatia Fraseri
    Plants of South Eastern New South Wales Flowers and leaves. Photographer Richard Hartland, Mt Stirling Flowering stem. Photographer Don Wood, Monga State Forest east of Braidwood Open seed cases with seeds. Australian Plant Image Line drawing. u. flowering branch. G Thomlinson, Index, photographer Murray Fagg, Australian National National Herbarium of Victoria, © 2021 Royal Botanic Botanic Gardens, Canberra, ACT. Gardens Board, Melbourne Shrub. Australian Plant Image Index, photographer Geoff Butler, New England N P Common name Silky Lomatia, Tree Lomatia, Forest Lomatia Family Proteaceae Where found Forest. Ranges, mainly south of the Kings Highway. Notes Shrub or tree to about 10 m high. Bark rough, with longitudinal fissures and horizontal lenticels, grey to dark brown. Buds and young stems rusty-hairy with appressed T-shaped hairs (needs a hand lens or a macro app on your phone/tablet to see), older stems eventually becoming hairless. Leaves alternating up the stems, 6–13 cm long, 10–35 mm wide, margins deeply or shallowly toothed, occasionally entire, or sometimes deeply dissected; upper surface dull green and hairless, lower surface pale yellow-green and dull or silky with appressed fine hairs, sometimes rusty hairy, tips blunt to pointed. Flowers white to cream, densely hairy, tubular, the tube slit by the style in bud, with 4 'petals' 7–9 mm long, splitting to the base when the flower is fully open. Flowers paired, in clusters 8–12 cm long. Flowers summer. Seeds with one wing. Intergrades with Lomatia myricoides or with Lomatia ilicifolia when they grow together. PlantNET description: http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl? page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Lomatia~fraseri (accessed 24 January, 2021) Author: Betty Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Laurales, Early Cretaceous to Present
    BS 55 441 Variation in diversity among Laurales, Early Cretaceous to Present Susanne S. Renner Renner, S.S. 2004. Variation in diversity among Laurales, Early Cretaceous to Present. Biol. Skr. 55: 441-458. ISSN 0366-3612. ISBN 87-7304-304-4. Molecular data accumulated since 1999 have shown that monophyletic Laurales consist of Caly- canthaceae, 10 species, ( (Siparunaceae, 70 spp., (Atherospermataceae, 14 spp., Gomortegaceae, 1 sp.)), (Lauraceae, 2500-3000 spp., Hernandiaceae, 50 spp., Monimiaceae, 195 spp.)). As assessed by Guyer and Slowinski’s imbalance metric, Lauraceae and Siparunaceae are signifi­ cantly more species rich than if populations/species in Laurales families had proliferated with some random equal likelihood. Four of these families have fossil records that go back to the Cre­ taceous, one goes back to the Oligocène, and two are unknown as fossils (Hernandiaceae, Siparunaceae). All have multi-locus molecular phylogenies that together include representatives of 79 of the 92 genera, permitting the calibration of local molecular clocks and the comparison of families in terms of the geological periods during which they accumulated most of their extant net diversity. Most data sets exhibit sufficient heterogeneity in substitution rates to warrant semi­ parametric models of sequence evolution in which different rates are assumed between ancestral and descendent branches, but excessive heterogeneity is penalized. A comparison of penalized likelihood chronograms for the six families with more than one species suggests that at the rela­ tively deep level of the analysis, climate change did not affect related families in similar ways. On the other hand, the raise of the Andes appears to relate to bursts of species accumulation in both, Lauraceae and Siparunaceae.
    [Show full text]