DOCSLIB.ORG

Palm Beach County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan; Providing for Conflicts; and Providing for an Effective Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RESOLUTION NO. 01-01-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF LAKE PARK, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 2015 REVISED UNIFIED PALM BEACH COUNTY LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY PLAN; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Lake Park (“Town”) is a municipal corporation of the State of Florida with such powers and authority as has been conferred upon it pursuant to the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Palm Beach County is susceptible to a variety of natural, technological, and human- caused disasters, including but not limited to, severe weather, hazardous materials incidents, nuclear power plant emergencies, communicable diseases, and domestic security incidents as well as climate impacts and sea level rise that cause increased inundation, shoreline erosion, flooding from severe weather events, accelerated saltwater contamination of ground water and surface water supplies, and expedited loss of critical habitats; and WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 was enacted to establish a national disaster hazard mitigation program to reduce the loss of life and property, human suffering, economic disruption, and disaster assistance costs resulting from disasters, and to assist state, local and tribal governments in implementing effective hazard mitigation measures to ensure the continuation of critical services and facilities after a natural disaster; and WHEREAS, Palm Beach County’s Local Mitigation Strategy, in coordination with governmental and non-governmental stakeholders having an interest in reducing the impact of disasters, and with input from the private sector and other members of the public, developed and revised the Palm Beach County Local Mitigation Strategy; and WHEREAS, the 2015 revised Local Mitigation Strategy has been approved by the Florida Division of Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency subject to adoption by the County Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the LMS Steering Committee recommends the formal adoption of the 2015 Revised Local Mitigation Strategy, including planned future enhancements described therein, by the County and all 38 participating municipalities. NOW, THREREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF LAKE PARK, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals and ratified and confirmed as being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this Resolution upon adoption thereof. Section 2. The Town Commission of the Town of Lake Park hereby approves and adopts the 2015 Revised Local Mitigation Strategy Plan (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) in its entirety, as revised by the LMS Steering Committee and approved by the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners, the Florida Division of Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Section 3. The Town Commission of the Town of Lake Park authorizes the appropriate Town officials to pursue available funding opportunities for implantation of proposed mitigation initiatives described in the Local Mitigation Strategy, and upon receipt of such funding or other necessary resources, seek to implement the actions in accordance with the mitigation strategies set out by the Local Mitigation Strategy. Section 4. The Town of Lake Park will continue to support and participate in the Local Mitigation Strategy planning and implementation process as required by Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Florida Division of Emergency Management, and the Palm Beach County Local Mitigation Strategy Steering Committee. Section 5. The Town of Lake Park will consider incorporation climate change concerns, sea level rise and natural hazards into the local comprehensive plan and into future reviews of flood prevention regulations and zoning codes. Section 6. The Town of Lake Park directs the Town Clerk to transmit an original of the executed Resolution to the Palm Beach County Division of Emergency Management, attention Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator, for filing in the Office of the Clerk and Comptroller. Section 7. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. Local Mitigation Strategy 2015 Palm Beach County Public Safety Department Division of Emergency Management 20 South Military Trail West Palm Beach, FL 33415 561-712-6400 Local Mitigation Strategy 2015 This page intentionally left blank 2 Local Mitigation Strategy 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................... 7 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Program Organization ...................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 LMS Structure ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Standing Committees ................................................................................................ 9 1.3.3 Community Rating System (CRS) Cooperating Committees ............................. 10 1.4 Participation Requirements ............................................................................................ 10 1.5 Jurisdictional Adoption .................................................................................................. 11 1.6 New Jurisdictions/Entities .............................................................................................. 11 1.8 Guiding Principles .......................................................................................................... 12 1.9 Process ............................................................................................................................ 12 1.10 Strategy ....................................................................................................................... 13 1.11 Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS ............... 17 2.1 Hazard Identification ...................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Natural Hazards ...................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1.1 Flooding ........................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1.2 Hurricane/Tropical Storm ................................................................................ 34 2.1.1.3 Tornado ............................................................................................................ 44 2.1.1.4 Severe Thunderstorm/Lightning ...................................................................... 48 2.1.1.5 Drought ............................................................................................................ 49 2.1.1.6 Extreme Temperatures ..................................................................................... 52 2.1.1.7 Agricultural Pest and Disease .......................................................................... 55 2.1.1.8 Wildfire/Urban Interface Zone ........................................................................ 57 2.1.1.9 Muck Fire ........................................................................................................ 58 2.1.1.10 Soil/Beach Erosion .......................................................................................... 59 2.1.1.11 Sea Level Rise ................................................................................................. 62 2.1.1.12 Seismic Hazards .............................................................................................. 63 2.1.1.13 Geologic Hazards .............................................................................................. 64 2.1.1.14 Pandemic ......................................................................................................... 66 3 Local Mitigation Strategy 2015 2.1.2 Technological Hazards............................................................................................ 70 2.1.2.1 Dike Failure .................................................................................................... 70 2.1.2.2 Hazardous Materials Accident ......................................................................... 71 2.1.2.3 Radiological Accidents (Nuclear Power Plant Accident) ................................ 72 2.1.2.4 Communications Failure.................................................................................. 73 2.1.2.5 Hazardous Materials Release ........................................................................... 73 2.1.2.6 Transportation System Accidents .................................................................... 73 2.1.2.7 Coastal Oil Spill............................................................................................... 74 2.1.2.8 Wellfield Contamination ................................................................................. 75 2.1.2.9 Power Failure (Outages)
Recommended publications
  • June 2016 Division 3, 7Th CG District Aux

    June 2016 Division 3, 7Th CG District Aux

    The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida Flotilla 36 Volume XXXV, Issue 7 Boca Raton, Florida Division 3, 7th CG District Aux July, 2011 Volume XXXX, Issue 6 June 2016 Division 3, 7th CG District Aux http://www.cgauxboca.org This version FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Disseminate to US Coast Guard and Coast Guard Auxiliary ONLY Flotilla 36 wished a fond farewell to Richard and Maddy Edwards, who have moved to Jacksonville, FL. Rick has been an FC, VFC, instructor, vessel examiner, and program visitor, as well as many other duties for the flotilla and division. He will be greatly missed. We all wish him the best in his new home. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 The information contained in this publication is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and may only be used for the official business the Coast Guard or the Coast Guard Auxiliary The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida And the Award goes to…. Robert Tingley (3rd from left) is sworn in by FC Tom Thayer, VCDR D3 Marvin Merritt, and IPFC Rick Edwards. Todd Greenstein is sworn in as FSO-IS by IPFC Rick Edwards, VCDR D3 Marvin Merritt, and FC Tom Thayer. The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida The USGC Meritorious Team Commendation for participating on the 2015 D3 Boat Show Team is awarded to Ron Dillon, Andrea Rutherfoord, Helene Houge, Rick Edwards, and Mario Stagliano. Other flotilla members who participated received their awards at the Division meeting. The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida From the Helm… Tom Thayer Flotilla Commander 3 6 [email protected] Greetings, fellow Auxiliary Members! The Flotilla year continues to roll right along.
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems

    Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems

    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
  • Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1

    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1

    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31,
  • Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Florida: Maintenance Dredging

    Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Florida: Maintenance Dredging

    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, TO MIAMI, FLORIDA MAINTENANCE DREDGING Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida May 1974 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI MAINTENANCE DREDGING ( ) Draft (X) Final Responsible Office: U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Florida. 1. Name of Action: (X) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of Action: Eleven shoals are to be removed from this section of the Intracoastal Waterway as a part of the regular main­ tenance program. 3. a. Environmental Impacts. About 172,200 cubic yards of shoal material in the channel will be removed by hydraulic dredge and placed in diked upland areas and as nourishment on a county park beach south of Jupiter Inlet. b. Adverse Environmental Effects. Dredging will have a temporary adverse effect on water quality and will destroy benthic organisms in both the shoal material and on the beach. In addition, some turtle nests at the beach nourishment site may be destroyed. 4. Alternatives. Consideration was given to alternate methods of spoil disposal. It was determined that the methods selected (as described in paragraph 1) would best accomplish the purpose of the project while minimizing adverse impact on the environment. 5. Comments received on the draft statement in response to the 3 November 1972 coordination letter: Respondent Date of Comments U. S. Coast Guard 7 November 1972 U. S. Department of Agriculture 8 November 1972 Florida State Museum 8 November 1972 Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 14 November 1972 Florida Department of Transportation 20 November 1972 Florida Department of Natural Resources 30 November 1972 Environmental Protection Agency 8 December 1972 Florida G&FWFC 13 December 1972 U.
  • Remote Sensing-Based Flood Mapping and Flood Hazard Assessment in Haiti

    Remote Sensing-Based Flood Mapping and Flood Hazard Assessment in Haiti

    www.dartmouth.edu/~floods/ csdms.colorado.edu Remote Sensing-based Flood Mapping and Flood Hazard Assessment in Haiti “Rebuilding for Resilience: How Science and Engineering Can Inform Haiti's Reconstruction, March 22 - March 23, 2010, University of Miami - Coral Gables, FL Prof. G. Robert Brakenridge Dartmouth Flood Observatory, Dartmouth College, and Visiting Scientist, Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System, University of Colorado Dr. Scott D. Peckham (Presenter) Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System, University of Colorado 1) Floods commonly produce catastrophic damage in Haiti 2) Not all such floods are from tropical cyclones On May 18-25, 2004, a low-pressure system originating from Central America brought exceptionally heavy showers and thunderstorms to Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Rainfall amounts exceeded 500 mm (19.7 inches) across the border areas of Haiti and the Dominican Republic At the town of Jimani, DR, 250 mm (10 inches) of rain fell in just 24 hours. NASA Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) data. Lethal Major Floods in the Dominican Republic / Haiti are a Near-Annual Event The Dartmouth Flood Observatory data archive dates back to 1985. Between 1986 and early 2004 (prior to Hurricane Jeanne in November), at least, fourteen lethal events impacted the island, including: Year Month Casualties 1986 early June >39 1986 late October 40 1988 early September - Hurricane Gilbert 237 1993 late May 20 1994 early November – Hurricane Gordon >1000 1996 mid November 18 1998 Late August – Hurricane Gustaf >22 1998 late September - Hurricane Georges >400 1999 late October - Hurricane Jose 4 2001 mid-May 15 2002 late May 30 2003 early December - Tropical Storm Odette 8 2003 mid-November 10 2004 late May >2000 NASA’s two MODIS sensors, Aqua and Terra, are an important flood mapping tool: • Visible and near IR spectral bands provide excellent land/water discrimination over wide areas.
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm

    Hurricane & Tropical Storm

    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
  • Description of the Proposed Action

    Description of the Proposed Action

    United States Department of the Interior FIS H AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20 111 Street Vero Beach. Florida 32960 Service Log Number: 41910-2011-F-0170 March 13, 2015 Alan M. Dodd, Colonel District Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 701 San Marco Boulevard, Room 3 72 Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8175 Dear Colonel Dodd: This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's revised Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Civil Works and Regulatory sand placement activities in Florida and their effects on the following sea turtles: Northwest Atlantic Ocean distinct population segment (NW AO DPS) of loggerhead (Carella caretta) and its designated terrestrial critical habitat; green (Chelonia mydas); leatherback (Dermoche!ys coriacea); hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata); and Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) ; and the following beach mice: southeastern (Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris); Anastasia Island (Peromyscus polionolus phasma); Choctawhatchee (Peromyscus polionotus a!lophrys); St. Andrews (Peromyscus polionotus peninsularis) ; and Perdido Key (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis) and their designated critical habitat. It does not address effects of these activities on the non-breeding piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and its designated critical habitat or for the red knot (Calidris canutus rufa), a species currently proposed for listing. Effects of Corps planning and regulatory shore protection activities on the non-breeding piping plover and its designated critical habitat within the North Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility and the South Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility are addressed in the Service's May 22, 2013, Programmatic Piping Plover Biological Opinion.
  • 10.7 Positive Feedback Regimes During Tropical Cyclone Passage

    10.7 Positive Feedback Regimes During Tropical Cyclone Passage

    10.7 POSITIVE FEEDBACK REGIMES DURING TROPICAL CYCLONE PASSAGE Lynn K. Shay Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami 1. INTRODUCTION Coupled oceanic and atmospheric models to accurately predict hurricane intensity and structure change will eventually be used to issue forecasts to the public who increasingly rely on the most advanced weather forecasting systems to prepare for landfall. Early ocean-atmosphere studies have emphasized the negative feedback between tropical cyclones and the ocean due to the cold wake beginning in back of the eye (Chang and Anthes 1978; Price 1981; Shay et al. 1992). The extent of this cooling in the cold wake is a function of vertical current shears (known as entrainment heat flux) that reduce the Richardson numbers to below criticality and subsequently cools and deepens the oceanic mixed layer (OML) through vigorous mixing. Notwithstanding, early studies did not consider the relative importance of deep, warm OML associated with Caribbean Current, Loop Current, Florida Current, Gulf Stream and the warm eddy field. Since pre-existing ocean current structure advects deep, warm thermal layers, cooling induced by these physical Figure 1: a) Hurricane image and b) a cartoon showing processes (Fig.~1) is considerably less (e.g. less physical processes forced by hurricane winds. negative feedback) as more turbulent-induced mixing is required to cool and deepen the OML. Central to the and Airborne eXpendable Bathythermographs deployed atmospheric response is the amount of heat in the OML during a joint NSF/NOAA experiment from several or ocean heat content (OHC) relative to the depth of the aircraft flights in hurricanes Isidore and Lili (2002) are o 26 C isotherm (Leipper and Volgenau 1972).
  • Palm Beach County Project / Control Cross Reference Listing 2/8/2017

    Palm Beach County Project / Control Cross Reference Listing 2/8/2017

    Palm Beach County Project / Control Cross Reference Listing 2/8/2017 NAME PROJECT CONTROL PAGE BOOK 10 Acre Dillman Property (Master) 00859-000 2002-00058 1001 Hibiscus Lane 00012-190 0000-000000034 118 101 North Federal Highway 00006-007 0000-000000022 099 101 SE 7th Avenue 00012-214 0000-000000058 122 104 NE 2nd Avenue Plat 00012-140 0000-000000120 114 10th and 10th Center 00012-149 0000-000000039 116 1100 Commerce Park 00036-002 0000-000000060 098 1112 South Flagler Drive 00074-315 0000-000000128 118 112th/Northlake Office 05764-000 2006-00529 1150 Skees Road 05007-000 2003-00072 14070 Paradise Point Plat Waiver 03100-582 0000-00000 150 Oceanside 00012-204 0000-000000181 119 1747 South Military Trail 05034-001 1984-00075 1747 South Military Trail 05034-001 2003-00041 1747 South Military Trail 05034-001 2007-00407 1771 South Congress Avenue 00070-033 0000-000000135 121 1800 North Military Trail 00006-052 0000-000000094 108 1801 Clint Moore Road 00006-116 0000-000000027 116 181st Street South Plat 00303-009 1972-001180007 057 1850 Okeechobee Blvd 05000-270 1995-00091 1960 Okeechobee Blvd 05000-335 1996-00075 1st Road - Hines Plat Waiver 03100-597 2006-00405 200 East Plat 00006-008 0000-000000020 100 2003 Tequesta Associates, LLC 00060-006 0000-000000007 100 2085 Zip Code Lane 05400-000 1997-00037 2091 Indian Road Rezoning 05446-000 1997-00107 2101 Australian 00074-324 0000-000000159 120 2295 South Ocean Blvd Condo 00050-010 0000-00000 2540 Okeechobee Blvd 05000-221 1977-00193 2645 Medical Center 00012-201 0000-000000117 119 2911 Nokomis
  • FAU Institutional Repository

    FAU Institutional Repository

    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Department of Geosciences. Notice: ©1993 Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc. [CERF] http://www.cerfjcr.org/ . This manuscript may be cited as: Finkl, Jnr. C. W. (1993). Pre-emptive strategies for enhanced sand bypassing and beach replenishment activities in Southeast Florida: A geological perspective. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 18, Beach/Inlet Processes and Management: A Florida Perspective, 58-89. 58 COASTAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA'S COASTAL ENGINEERING ARCHIVES PHOTO 2. View of Government Cut. Photo dated February 17, 1936. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 18, 1993 Journal ofCoastal ReIC8l'Ch Fort Lauderdale, Florida Fall 1993 Pre-Emptive Strategies for Enhanced Sand Bypassing and Beach Replenishment Activities in Southeast Florida: A Geological Perspective Charles W. Finkl, Jor. Department of Geology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA ABSTRACT FINKL, C.W., Jnr., 1993. Pre-emptive strategies for enhanced sand bypassing and beach replenishment activities in southeast Florida: A geological perspective. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 18, 59-89. Fort Lauderdale (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Although beaches on the southeast Florida coast are periodically replenished in an effort to reduce shoreline recession, such efforts have been only moderately successful. Erosion of sandy beaches on the downdrift (south) sides ofjettied inlets is a chronic problem that requires remediation. In order for erosion control measures to be effective, e.g. function harmoniously within the natural balance of coastal systems, coastal protection measures must consider the geological framework for this subtropical coast as it influences strategies for coastal management.
  • Downloaded 10/09/21 08:10 PM UTC During a Tropical Cyclone in the United States During Sualties Resulting from Lightning and Wind-Related the Twentieth Century

    Downloaded 10/09/21 08:10 PM UTC During a Tropical Cyclone in the United States During Sualties Resulting from Lightning and Wind-Related the Twentieth Century

    Loss of Life in the United States s Associated with Recent Atlantic Tropical Cyclones Edward N. Rappaport NOAA/NWS/Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida ABSTRACT A database was established for the period 1970-99 to assess the threat to life in the contiguous United States and adjacent coastal waters from Atlantic tropical cyclones. Freshwater floods caused more than one-half of the 600 U.S. deaths directly associated with tropical cyclones or their remnants during that 30-year period. More than three-quarters of the victims under age 13 died in rain-induced floods. Most fatalities occurred in inland counties. Storm surge losses were significantly (but perhaps only temporarily) less than in previous periods of comparable length. This paper pre- sents a statistical summary of the casualties, explores reasons for the losses, and reviews efforts to mitigate the threats. 1 . Introduction which can occur hundreds of miles inland, recently claimed up to thousands of lives in the Americas and Atlantic tropical cyclones have likely killed be- the Caribbean (e.g., 1998 Hurricanes1 Mitch in Hon- tween one-third and one-half a million people since duras and Nicaragua, and Georges in Hispaniola; 1994 the discovery of the New World, including around Hurricane Gordon in Haiti; 1993 Tropical Storm Bret 25 000 people in the United States after the American in Venezuela; 1988 Hurricane Gilbert in Mexico). Revolution (Rappaport and Fernandez-Partagas 1995). These losses extend a centuries-long trend—for the The largest U.S. disasters occurred after 1880 (e.g., in location of tropical cyclone-related casualties in the South Carolina and Georgia in 1881 and 1893; in Loui- Western Hemisphere to migrate with the population— siana in 1893; in Galveston, Texas, and its environs from casualties at sea through the 1700s, to the shore- in 1900; near Lake Okeechobee in 1928) and, in nearly line and coastal zone through the mid-1900s, to some every instance, storm surge was the predominant killer.
  • Haiti's Emergency Management

    Haiti's Emergency Management

    Haiti’s Emergency Management: A Case of Regional Support, Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations for the Future Erin Fordyce1, Abdul-Akeem Sadiq2, and Grace Chikoto3 Introduction As one of the poorest nations in the Western Hemisphere (with over 70 percent of the population living on less than $2 a day) (Grunewald et al. 2010), one wonders about the state of the Haitian Emergency Management System prior to the 2010 earthquake. Clearly, Haiti has been an economically-challenged nation for decades and its protracted poverty level further increases its vulnerability to disasters (PAHO 1994) and impacts its ability to respond and recover effectively when disasters occur. In addition, political instabilities have led to poor economic development opportunities and increased risks. In spite of Haiti’s economic and political challenges, it is possible to gain insight into what the country’s emergency management system looked like before the 2010 earthquake. Haiti had a fledgling national emergency management system in place - one that was heavily supported by both regional and international bodies. The earthquake of January 12, 2010, however, underscores the need for a better disaster reduction and response program, one that would address the underlying and protracted vulnerabilities of Haiti, while ushering in new winds of change that would pump fresh blood into the veins of the emergency management system. This chapter reviews the history of Haiti, including its demography and geography, and examines the hazards and factors contributing to the nation’s vulnerability to disasters. Furthermore, this chapter discusses some past disasters, Haiti’s emergency management system as well as the opportunities and the challenges confronting the system.