DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of the White Paper on Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of the White Paper on Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism SUMMARY OF THE WHITE PAPER ON LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT AND TOURISM IN JAPAN, 2020 Policy Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism（MLIT） Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Summary of the White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan, 2020 Special Feature: Response to COVID-19 1. Emergence and Spread of COVID-19 2. Measures to Prevent the Spread of Infection 3. Impact on and Responses in the Fields of Land, 4. Future Measures Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Part I Design Reform of Society and Livelihood ~ The Challenge Toward the MLIT�s 20th Anniversary ~ Chapter 1 Environmental Changes Surrounding Japan and the MLIT�s Efforts to Address Them 1. Environmental Changes Surrounding Japan 2. The MLIT�s Efforts to Address Environmental Changes Chapter 2 Various Environmental Changes Expected in the Future 1. Forecasts Concerning Social Structure 2. Forecasts Concerning the Global Environment 3. Forecasts Concerning the International and Natural Disasters Environment Chapter 3 Issues to be Addressed by and the Future Direction of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Administration 1. To Keep Safety from Disasters 2. To Achieve a Sustainable Infrastructure Maintenance Cycle 3. To Secure Regional Transportation 4. To Get Overseas Vitality 5. To Make Use of New Technologies Part II Trends in MLIT Policies ~ Report on Trends in Each Field of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Policies by Policy Issue ~ 1 Special Feature: Response to COVID-19, Part (1) 1. Emergence and Spread of COVID-19 ����������������������� �������� �������������������������������� ������������������������ • SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease COVID-19, is one type of coronavirus. Coronaviruses include the viruses that cause ������ the common cold as well as SARS and MERS. ������ �������������������������� • Infection may cause fever and respiratory symptoms lasting about a week. About 80% of affected individuals experience a ������ ������������������������������������� mild course, however the risk of death is higher than for seasonal �u, and the elderly and those with underlying conditions ����� have a higher risk of severe disease. ������������������� ����� �������������� • The routes of infection are mainly droplet transmission and contact transmission, with a high risk of infection spread in the ����������������� �Three Cs� (closed spaces, crowded places, and close-contact settings). ����� • The disease emerged in Wuhan, China in late December 2019, and spread around the world, including Japan. � • As of May 31, the total number of people infected (cumulative) was approximately 6 million worldwide and 16,884 in Japan. ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2. Measures to Prevent the Spread of Infection • The MLIT mainly implemented the following measures: (i) From February 1, requested airlines and international passenger ship operators to (1) Establishment of a Response Headquarters inform passengers about the entry ban, check passports, and cooperate with CIQ • Jan. 30 In view of the spread of COVID-19 worldwide, the Novel Coronavirus Response authorities. Headquarters was established. The MLIT also established a response headquarters. (ii) Mar. 6 Requested that arrival airports for air passenger �ights from China and South (Reference) • Late December 2019 First outbreak in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, Korea be limited to Narita International Airport and Kansai International Airport. China (iii) Apr. 1 Requested a reduction in the number of passengers arriving on air passenger • Jan. 15, 2020 First infection in Japan �ights from foreign countries by reducing the number of �ights. • Jan. 30, 2020 WHO declared a state of emergency (5) Measures to Prevent the Spread of Infection in Japan (2) Evacuation of Japanese Nationals from Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China • Feb. 26 The Government Response Headquarters requested the cancellation, • In response to a lockdown in Wuhan, China, the government returned 828 Japanese postponement, or reduction of the scale of events. nationals staying in the city on �ve chartered �ights to Japan. • Feb. 27 It was requested that all schools in Japan be temporarily closed. • The MLIT mainly implemented the following measures: (3) Response to the Outbreak on the Diamond Princess (i) Requested thorough measures to prevent infection and prompt reporting in the case • Feb. 3 The large cruise ship Diamond Princess of infection by railway, bus, and aviation operators, Michi-no-Eki, expressway SAs and arrived at the port of Yokohama and began PAs, and national parks. quarantine. (ii) Implemented announcements on public transportation such as railways and buses • Mar. 1 The disembarkation of about 3,700 crew calling for staggered work hours, telework, and thorough infection prevention measures. and passengers was completed. Diamond Princess (iii) For the Golden Week holidays, made calls at major airports, railway stations, road traf�c information centers, Michi-no-Eki, and expressway SAs and PAs. Provided road (4) Strengthening of Border Enforcement Measures information boards for people to refrain from crossing prefectural • Feb. 1 In response to a decision of the Government Response Headquarters, an borders, and requested the exclusion of holiday discounts for entry ban was placed on foreign nationals who had stayed in Hubei Province, China. express way tolls during the period. Since then, the ban was gradually expanded to other countries and regions (111 (iv) Implemented temperature inspection by thermography at Haneda Airport, etc. and assisted with temperature inspection conducted countries as of May 31). Temperature inspection by local governments at railway stations. at Haneda Airport 2 Special Feature: Response to COVID-19, Part (2) (6) Measures for Affected Industries • Apr. 7 A state of emergency was declared, until May 6, in the prefectures of Saitama, • Feb. 13 The Government Response Headquarters decided the Novel Coronavirus Disease Chiba, Tokyo, Kanagawa, Osaka, Hyogo, and Fukuoka. (COVID-19) Emergency Response Package. • Apr. 16 Thirteen prefectures�Hokkaido, Ibaraki, Ishikawa, Gifu, Aichi, Kyoto plus those • Mar. 10 The Government Response Headquarters decided the Second Novel Coronavirus mentioned above�were designated for stepped-up measures, and the state of emergency Disease (COVID-19) Emergency Response Package. was expanded nationwide. • Apr. 20 The Cabinet approved Emergency Economic Measures to Cope with COVID-19 • May 4 It was decided to extend the duration of emergency situation measure worth 117 trillion yen (20% of Japan�s GDP), the country�s largest-ever supplementary budget. implementation until May 31. • May 27 The Cabinet approved a second supplementary budget (approx. 32 trillion yen), • May 14 The state of emergency was lifted in 39 prefectures, excluding Tokyo, Saitama, which combined with the �rst supplementary budget brought the scale of the project to over Chiba, Kanagawa, Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, and Hokkaido. 230 trillion yen. • May 21 The state of emergency was lifted in Osaka, Kyoto, and Hyogo prefectures, and continued in �ve prefectures. (7) Declaration of a State of Emergency • May 25 The state of emergency was lifted nationwide. • Mar. 13 An amendment to the Act on Special Measures for Pandemic In�uenza and New Infectious Diseases Preparedness and Response was enacted and promulgated, and, * Essential workers in many �elds, such as public transportation, logistics, and public works, engaged in their COVID-19 was included in the act. duties to maintain the functions of those �elds even during the state of emergency. 3. Impact on and Responses in the Fields of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (1) Impact of COVID-19 in Various Fields With the spread of COVID-19, the number of users and reservations decreased signi�cantly in tourism- and transportation-related industries due to people staying home to prevent the spread of infection, resulting in an extremely signi�cant impact on business. For this reason, the MLIT conducted a survey to understand the actual situation in these industries. (As of May 31) (i) Lodging Reservations (Versus the Same Month Last Year) (June and July are Forecasts) (iii) Aviation (Responses) • Regarding lodging reservations, Feb. 4% 256 • The number of passengers carried by Japanese air carries was, for approximately 90% of facilities declined Mar. 19% 27% 109 international �ights, down 98% in May and expected to decline by 95% in more than 70% in May and, again, about Apr. 11% 83% 108 June and, for domestic �ights, down 93% in May and expected to decline 90% of facilities were expecting declines May 6% 89% 108 by 88% in June. of more than 70% in June, with the Jun. 11% 89% 106 situation expected to remain extremely Jul. 13% 82% 106 Passengers Carried (Number of Reservations Versus the Same severe. No adverse effect Down 0% to 10% Down 10% to 20% Month Last Year) (Respondents: 17) Down 20% to 30% Down 30% to 50% Down 50% to 70% Down more than 70% (ii) Travel * Actual results for Feb. to May * Reservations as of May 31 for Jun. to Jul. • Reservations with major travel agencies 100% Reservations (Versus the Same Month last Year) (June and July are Forecasts) 99% for overseas travel, domestic travel, and [10 major agencies] [47 small/medium agencies*] 77% International flights travel to Japan were all close to zero in Overseas travel Domestic travel Travel to Japan * Almost all business is domestic travel Domestic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shizuoka Tĩnh Cương
    Shizuoka Tĩnh cương しずおかしこくさいこうりゅうきょうかい 静岡市国際交流協会 tháng １２ năm 2019 Hiệp hội giao lưu quốc tế tỉnh Shizuoka きゃっしゅれすけっさい Hotline キャッシュレス決済 Chúng tôi luôn sẵn sàng chia sẻ và đồng hành cùng Thanh toán không tiền mặt( điện tử) bạn.Hãy nhấc máy và gọi cho chúng tôi khi cần nhé! Từ tháng 10 năm 2019, chính phủ Nhật Bản chính thức thực thi tăng thuế *Trụ sở Shizuoka: (hỗ trợ tiêu dùng cá nhân từ 8% lên 10%. Tại Nhật, giá thành cao cùng với mức tiếng Việt thứ 6: 13h- tiêu dùng lớn, sự tăng thuế lần này có khả năng gây ảnh hưởng lớn đến , nền kinh tế của Nhật. Vì thế, để giảm thiểu tối đa ảnh hưởng xấu, chính 17h ngoài ra còn nhiều ngôn phủ Nhật đã đồng thuận khuyến khích chiến dịch thanh toán không tiền ngữ khác) mặt và ví điện tử. Đây là cách thức thanh toán chi phí không sử dụng tiền Tell: 054-273-5931 mặt. Do sự ảnh hưởng của tăng thuế và chiến dịch “point kangen” -chiến dịch hoàn phí bằng điểm thưởng thì thanh toán không tiền mặt được lan *Trụ sở Shimizu: rộng và phát triển nhanh chóng. Mang ưu điiểm thanh toán nhanh gọn Tell:054-354-2009 nhẹ, và rủi ro thấp. Sau đây là các loại phương thức đang được sủ dụng. *Hoặc gửi mail qua: 1.Thẻ credit [email protected] Đây là dạng phương thức dùng thẻ để website: www.samenet.jp thanh toán chi phí dịch vụ, phí mua hàng mà không cần tới tiền mặt.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartcard Ticketing Systems for More Intelligent Railway Systems
    Hitachi Review Vol. 60 (2011), No. 3 159 Smartcard Ticketing Systems for More Intelligent Railway Systems Yuichi Sato OVERVIEW: The smartcard ticketing systems whose scope is expanding Masakazu Ito across Japan are now starting to be used not just for public transport Manabu Miyatake ticketing services but also to provide users with an infrastructure that they use in their daily lives including electronic money and mobile services, credit card integration, building access control, and student identification. Hitachi has already contributed to this process through the development and implementation of smartcard ticketing systems for different regions and is now working on the development of systems that support the implementation of smart systems that underpin society and combine information and control to provide new social infrastructure for the foreseeable future. INTRODUCTION TABLE 1. Smartcard Ticketing Systems in Japan A number of smartcard ticketing systems have been Smartcard ticketing systems have spread right across Japan introduced in different parts of Japan since the over the last 10 years. *1 Service Smartcard Suica service of the East Japan Railway Company Operator commenced operation in November 2001. As of March commenced name* 2009, systems of this type had been introduced at November, 2001 Suica East Japan Railway Company Nagasaki Transportation Bureau of Nagasaki January, 2002 about 25 companies including both JR (Japan Railway) Smartcard Prefecture and others IC Saitama Railway Co., Ltd. (switched to Group and private railway companies (see Table 1). March, 2002 The East Japan Railway Company is the leader TEIKIKEN PASMO) Monorail April, 2002 Tokyo Monorail Co., Ltd. in this field and its aims in introducing the Suica Suica service include providing its passengers with greater July, 2002 Setamaru Tokyu Corporation convenience, facilitating cashless operation at railway December, 2002 Rinkai Suica Tokyo Waterfront Area Rapid Transit, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail-To-Bus and Bus-To-Rail Transfer Time Distributions Estimation Based on Passive Data
    CASPT 2018 Extended Abstract Rail-to-Bus and Bus-to-Rail Transfer Time Distributions Estimation Based on Passive Data Amr M. Wahaballa · Fumitaka Kurauchi · Jan-Dirk Schmöcker · Takenori Iwamoto Abstract Transit travel time can be decomposed into walking, waiting, transfer and in-vehicle times, and some of these components can reasonably be assumed independent of one another. A practical transfer time distribution that is based on real- world data is difficult to estimate and has rarely been analysed in the literature. This may be due to the difficulty of collecting sufficient data, the dependency of transfer time and other journey time components on walking and waiting time and their variabilities. This paper utilises passive smart card data from Japan to estimate the distributions of the transfer time between bus stops and rail stations. The walking and waiting time distributions are concurrently estimated by the likelihood maximisation of a stochastic frontier model. Keywords: Transit · Transfer time · Walking time · Waiting time · Stochastic frontier model · Smart card data Amr M. Wahaballa Department of Civil Engineering, Aswan University Aswan, Egypt Email: [email protected] Fumitaka Kurauchi Department of Civil Engineering, Gifu University Gifu, Japan Email: [email protected] Jan-Dirk Schmöcker Department of Urban Management, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Takenori Iwamoto Shizuoka Railway Co., Ltd Shizuoka, Japan Email: [email protected] 1 Introduction Smart cards, utilised for automatic collection of transit fares, provide a rich and valuable data for many public transportation planning and management aspects. However, smart card data only provide the time of payment transaction which may be done at either boarding or alighting station or both (for tap-in and tap-out transaction system) without providing any information about the time spent on walking, waiting, in-vehicle or transfer among transit lines and/or modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Cooperation for Urban Development in Indonesia
    Japan-Indonesia Seminar for Urban Development and Housing 2017 Keynote Speech Japan‘s Cooperation for Urban Development in Indonesia Dr. Hiroto IZUMI, Special Advisor to the Prime Minister September 5, 2017 1. Comparison of Indonesia and Japan 2. Urban Development: challenges in Indonesia 3. Urban Development: experience and responses in Japan 3-1. Experiences of Urban Policy in Japan 3-2. Development of Regional Transport Network 3-3. TOD: Urban Development harmonized with Transportation Network 3-4. Urban Redevelopment 3-5. Strength of Japanese Cities: Smart City 3-6. Experiences of Housing Policy in Japan (ref.) Urban Development Schemes related to Indonesia’s challenges 4. Dissemination of infrastructure systems by Japanese government 4-1. Structure for Promoting the dissemination of infrastructure systems 4-2. Japanese cooperation in urban development and Housing in Indonesia 4-3. Japan’s principles for infrastructure cooperation 1 1. Comparison of Indonesia and Japan 2. Urban Development: challenges in Indonesia 3. Urban Development: experience and responses in Japan 3-1. Experiences of Urban Policy in Japan 3-2. Development of Regional Transport Network 3-3. TOD: Urban Development harmonized with Transportation Network 3-4. Urban Redevelopment 3-5. Strength of Japanese Cities: Smart City 3-6. Experiences of Housing Policy in Japan (ref.) Urban Development Schemes related to Indonesia’s challenges 4. Dissemination of infrastructure systems by Japanese government 4-1. Structure for Promoting the dissemination of infrastructure systems
    [Show full text]