DOCSLIB.ORG

Geometry and Topology in Electronic Structure Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Geometry and Topology in Electronic Structure Theory Raffaele Resta Notes subject to ongoing editing This version run through LATEX on 3–Mar–21 at 16:23 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 About the present Notes . 1 1.2 What topology is about . 2 1.2.1 Gauss-Bonnet theorem . 2 1.2.2 Euler characteristic . 4 1.3 Electronic wavefunctions . 4 1.4 Units . 5 1.5 Symbols . 6 1.6 Gauge and flux . 6 1.6.1 Classical mechanics . 7 1.6.2 Quantum mechanics, open boundary conditions . 7 1.6.3 Quantum mechanics, periodic boundary conditions . 8 1.6.4 Example: Free particle in 1d ................... 8 1.6.5 Flux and flux quantum . .9 2 Early discoveries 11 2.1 The Aharonov-Bohm effect: A paradox? . 11 2.2 Conical intersections in molecules . 12 2.3 Quantization of the surface charge . 15 2.4 Integer quantum Hall effect . 16 2.4.1 Classical theory (Drude-Zener) . 16 2.4.2 Landau levels . 19 2.4.3 The experiment . 19 2.4.4 Early theoretical interpretation . 20 3 Berryology 24 3.1 Distance and connection . 24 3.2 Geometry in a parameter space . 25 3.3 Berry phase . 26 3.4 Connection and curvature . 28 3.5 Chern number . 29 i 3.6 Metric . 30 3.7 Parallel-transport gauge and sum over states . 31 3.8 Time-reversal and inversion symmetries . 31 3.9 Bloch geometry . 32 3.9.1 Bloch orbitals . 32 3.9.2 Connection, curvature, and metric . 34 3.9.3 Bloch projector . 35 3.9.4 Discretization in computer implementations . 36 3.10 NonAbelian geometry . 37 3.10.1 Generalities . 37 3.10.2 Exterior product and differentiation . 38 3.10.3 NonAbelian connection and curvature . 39 3.10.4 Chern-Simons 3-form . 40 3.10.5 Z2 topological invariants . 41 4 Manifestations of the Berry phase 42 4.1 A toy-model Hamiltonian . 42 4.1.1 Connection and curvature . 42 4.1.2 Chern number . 43 4.1.3 Berry phase . 43 4.1.4 Computing a Chern number . 44 4.2 Early discoveries reinterpreted . 46 4.2.1 Aharonov-Bohm effect . 46 4.2.2 Molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect . 47 4.2.3 The Z2 invariant in molecular physics . 48 4.2.4 Integer quantum Hall effect (TKNN invariant) . 49 4.2.5 Classical limit of TKNN . 51 4.3 Adiabatic approximation in a magnetic field . 52 4.3.1 Hydrogen atom in a constant B field . 54 4.3.2 A molecule in a constant B field . 55 4.4 Semiclassical transport . 57 4.4.1 Textbook equations of motion . 57 4.4.2 Modern equations of motion . 58 4.4.3 Equations of motion in symplectic form . 59 4.4.4 Geometrical correction to the density of states . 60 4.4.5 Outstanding consequences of the modified density of states . 61 4.5 Quantum transport . 62 4.5.1 Transport by a single state . 62 4.5.2 Current carried by filled bands . 63 4.5.3 Quantization of charge transport . 64 4.6 Charge transport in ionic liquids . 64 ii 4.6.1 Faraday law and oxidation numbers . 65 4.6.2 Ionic conductivity . 66 5 Macroscopic polarization 68 5.1 Polarization and electric field . 68 5.2 Polarization differences . 69 5.3 Independent electrons . 72 5.3.1 The King-Smith and Vanderbilt formula . 72 5.3.2 The quantum of polarization . 73 5.3.3 Wannier functions . 73 5.4 Polarization itself . 75 5.4.1 Polarization of a bounded crystallite . 76 5.4.2 Unbounded crystal . 77 5.5 Polarization as a multivalued observable . 79 5.6 Polarization of a band insulator revisited . 80 5.6.1 The surface charge theorem . 81 5.6.2 The single-point Berry phase in the noncrystalline case . 83 5.6.3 Kohn-Sham polarization vs. real polarization . 85 5.7 Polarization as a Z2 topological invariant . 86 6 Chern-Simons geometric phase 89 6.1 Axion term in magnetoelectric response . 89 6.1.1 Z2 topological insulators in 3d . 90 6.1.2 Numerical considerations . 91 6.2 Polarization and Chern number revisited . 92 6.2.1 Open boundary conditions . 93 6.2.2 Why even and odd dimensions are different . 94 7 Theory of the insulating state 96 7.1 Quadratic spread of the Wannier functions . 98 7.1.1 Metals . 99 7.2 Conductivity and Drude weight . 100 7.2.1 Generalities . 100 7.2.2 Kohn’s expression for the Drude weight . 101 7.2.3 Kubo formulæ for conductivity . 102 7.2.4 Semiclassical theory of electron transport . 105 7.2.5 Adiabatic vs. nonadiabatic inertia of the many-electron system106 7.2.6 The insulating state according to Resta and Sorella . 108 7.2.7 Independent electrons . 110 7.3 Geometry of the many-body ground state . 111 7.3.1 Metric and the Resta-Sorella theory . 112 iii 7.3.2 Drude weight revisited . 113 7.3.3 The sum rule of Souza, Wilkens, and Martin . 114 7.4 Bounded samples within open boundary conditions . 115 7.4.1 Many-body geometry within OBCs . 116 7.4.2 OBC vs. PBC metrics (independent electrons) . 118 7.4.3 Conductivity of a bounded sample within OBCs . 119 7.4.4 Drude weight in bounded samples within OBCs . 121 7.4.5 Souza-Wilkens-Martin within OBCs . 122 7.5 Band insulators, Anderson insulators, Mott insulators, and more . 123 7.5.1 Band insulator: model ionic crystal in 1d . 123 7.5.2 Band insulators: tetrahedrally coordinated semiconductors . 124 7.5.3 Anderson insulator: model 1d system . 124 7.5.4 Anderson metal-insulator transition in a model 3d solid . 126 7.5.5 Two-band model insulator in 1d: topological nature of the Mott-like transition . 128 7.5.6 Mott metal-insulator transition in a linear hydrogen chain . 130 7.5.7 Quantum Hall insulator . 130 8 Anomalous Hall conductivity 133 8.1 Generalities . 133 8.2 Many-body theory . 134 8.2.1 Kubo formula . 134 8.2.2 Transverse dc conductivity . 135 8.2.3 Chern number and quantum anomalous Hall effect . 136 8.2.4 Extrinsic effects . 137 8.3 Independent electrons . 137 8.3.1 Transverse dc conductivity . 137 8.3.2 AHC in gauge-invariant form . 138 8.3.3 Metals . 139 8.3.4 Chern invariant in band insulators . 140 8.3.5 Hermaphrodite orbitals . 143 8.4 Haldanium . 148 8.4.1 Exact diagonalization; skyrmion-like invariant . 149 8.5 Geometry and topology in r-space . 150 8.6 Nonlinear Hall conductivity . 152 9 Magnetization 154 9.1 Magnetization and magnetic field . 155 9.2 Orbital magnetization . 156 9.3 Orbital magnetization of a bounded sample . 157 9.3.1 Orbital magnetization of an unbounded crystalline sample . 159 iv 9.3.2 Insulators and metals . 161 A Magnetoelectrics (basic features) 163 A.1 Generalities . 163 A.2 B vs. H fields . 164 A.3 Multiferroics . 164 A.4 Linear magnetoelectrics . 165 A.5 Parsing the magnetoelectric effect . ..
Recommended publications
  • AAS Oscillation 16, 80, 87 AB Effect 15 AB Oscillation 15 AB Type

    AAS Oscillation 16, 80, 87 AB Effect 15 AB Oscillation 15 AB Type

    Index AAS oscillation 16, 80, 87 atomic-force-microscopy 228 AB effect 15 Au 15 AB oscillation 15 AB type oscillation 76, 81, 86 backward scattering 56 acceleration equation 35 ballistic motion 4, 27 addition energy 67 ballistic regime 5 AFM 228, 243, 247 ballistic transport 1, 6, 28 Ag 3 band offset 190 Aharonov-Bohm effect 1, 15 BDD 220 Aharonov-Bohm flux 110 bend resistance 27 Aharonov-Bohm oscillation 16 Bethe ansatz 45 Aharonov-Bohm type oscillation bi-exciton 268 76 binary decision diagram 220 Al 43 blackbody emission 99 AlAs 105,176, 183, 199,228,249 blackbody radiation 101 AlAs/GaAs 22 Bloch condition 83 AIGaAs 104, 184, 228, 238, 247 Blochfrequency 199 AIGaAs/GaAs 99 Bloch oscillation 35, 102, 104, 199 AIGalnAs/lnP 179 Bloch's theorem 83, 140 AIGalnP 176 Bohr radius 4 AIGalnP /GaAs 177 Boltzmann constant 5,31 Altshuler-Aronov-Spivak oscilla­ Boltzmann distribution 64 tion 16, 72, 80 Boltzmann transport equation 3 analog computation 222 Boolean expression 220 Anderson localization 5, 8, 87, Boolean operation 220 109, 146 Born approximation 46, 56, 58 anisotropic etching 216 bosonization technique 25, 47 antidot disorder 80, 87 boundary roughness 54 antidot lattice 8, 72 Bragg reflection 1, 104, 187, 199 antidot potential 72 breakdown of quantum Hall effect aperture function 205 112 artificial atom 1, 66 Brillouin zone 35, 104 aspect ratio 73 bulk 4 274 Index bulk-current picture 109 Coulomb blockade oscillation 37, butterfly oscillation 77 66, 218 butterfly spectrum 8 Coulomb diamond 67 Biittiker-Landauer formula 85, Coulomb gap
  • Probing Topological Properties of Bloch Bands with Ultracold Atoms in a Honeycomb Optical Lattice

    Probing Topological Properties of Bloch Bands with Ultracold Atoms in a Honeycomb Optical Lattice

    Probing topological properties of Bloch bands with ultracold atoms in a honeycomb optical lattice Lucia Duca M¨unchen,2015 Probing topological properties of Bloch bands with ultracold atoms in a honeycomb optical lattice Lucia Duca Dissertation an der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Ludwig{Maximilians{Universit¨at M¨unchen vorgelegt von Lucia Duca aus Ancona, Italien M¨unchen, Juli 2015 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Immanuel Bloch Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Zwerger Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:18 September 2015 Zusammenfassung Vor ¨uber 30 Jahren beschrieb Berry die Effekte, die durch die geometrische Struk- tur des Hilbertraums auf die adiabatische Bewegung quantenmechanischer Systeme wirken. Seit dem hat das Konzept der geometrischen Phasen, die mit der adia- batischen Bewegung verbunden werden sogenannten Berry-Phasen in einer grossen Anzahl physikalischer Systeme Anwendung gefunden. In der Festk¨orperphysik sind analoge topologische Eigenschaften von B¨andernf¨ureine Vielzahl von Vielteilch- eneffekten verantwortlich, zum Beispiel f¨urden ganzzahligen Quanten-Hall-Effekt und die Existenz robuster leitender Randzust¨andein topologischen Isolatoren. Die Berry-Kr¨ummung, jener Parameter der die Geometrie der Eigenzust¨andeder B¨ander beschreibt, ist von fundamentaler Bedeutung f¨urdie Charakterisierung physikalis- cher Eigenschaften von Elektronenzust¨andenin der Festk¨orperphysik und bestimmt die topologische Invariante eines Bandes, die sogenannte Chern-Zahl. Obwohl die Berry-Phase und die Berry-Kr¨ummung eine zentrale Rolle in der Bestimmung topol- ogischer Eigenschaften von B¨andernspielen, bleibt die Messung der kompletten ge- ometrischen Struktur eines Bandes eine grosse experimentelle Herausforderung. Diese Arbeit berichtet ¨uber die experimentelle Realisierung eines hexagonalen optischen Gitters f¨urultrakalte Atome, dessen Eigenschaften denen von Graphen ¨ahneln.
  • Probing and Preparing Novel States of Quantum Degenerate Rubidium

    Probing and Preparing Novel States of Quantum Degenerate Rubidium

    Probing and Preparing Novel States of Quantum Degenerate Rubidium Atoms in Optical Lattices by Hirokazu Miyake Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2013 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2013. All rights reserved. Author.............................................................. Department of Physics May 20, 2013 Certified by. Wolfgang Ketterle John D. MacArthur Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Certified by. David E. Pritchard Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . John W. Belcher Class of '22 Professor of Physics Associate Department Head for Education 2 Probing and Preparing Novel States of Quantum Degenerate Rubidium Atoms in Optical Lattices by Hirokazu Miyake Submitted to the Department of Physics on May 20, 2013, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Ultracold atoms in optical lattices are promising systems to realize and study novel quantum mechanical phases of matter with the control and precision offered by atomic physics. Towards this goal, as important as engineering new states of matter is the need to develop new techniques to probe these systems. I first describe our work on realizing Bragg scattering of infrared light from ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices. This is a detection technique which probes the spatial ordering of a crystalline system, and has led to our observation of Heisenberg- limited wavefunction dynamics. Furthermore, we have observed the superfluid to Mott insulator transition through the matter wave Talbot effect. This technique will be particularly powerful for studying antiferromagnetic phases of matter due to its sensitivity to the crystalline composition.
  • Intraband Dynamics in the Optically Excited Wannier-Stark Ladder Spectrum of Semiconductor Superlattices

    Intraband Dynamics in the Optically Excited Wannier-Stark Ladder Spectrum of Semiconductor Superlattices

    Institut f¨ur Angewandte Photophysik Fachrichtung Physik Fakult¨at Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Technische Universit¨at Dresden Intraband Dynamics in the Optically Excited Wannier-Stark Ladder Spectrum of Semiconductor Superlattices Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Ben Rosam geboren am 23. Oktober 1973 in Schlema Dresden 2004 verteidigt am 22.04.2005 Contents Publications 3 1 Introduction 7 1.1 The Semiconductor Superlattice: A Model System . ..... 11 2 The Eigenspectrum of Biased Semiconductor Superlattices 15 2.1 Flat-Field Energy Spectrum of a Superlattice . ...... 15 2.2 Wannier-Stark Ladder States . 17 2.2.1 Wannier-Stark Ladder States Detected in the Optical Spectrum . 19 2.2.2 Exciton Wannier-Stark Ladder Transitions . .... 21 2.3 Wave Packets of Wannier-Stark Ladder States: Bloch Oscillations . 27 2.3.1 Manipulation of the Dynamics of Bloch Oscillations . ..... 29 2.4 Wannier-Stark Ladder States in the Regime of Zener Tunneling . 35 3 ZenerTunnelingEffectinSemiconductorSuperlattices 39 3.1 Techniques of Optical Interband Spectroscopy . ...... 40 3.2 ExperimentalTechniques. 43 3.2.1 Linear Absorption Spectroscopy . 43 3.2.2 Time-Resolved Spectroscopy, Transient Four-Wave-Mixing . 44 3.3 Zener Tunneling in Designed Bandstructures . ..... 48 3.4 ExperimentalSet-Up. 52 3.5 Experimental Results and Discussion . 53 3.5.1 Zener Breakdown in a High-Barrier Superlattice . .... 53 3.5.2 Field-Induced Delocalization of Wannier-Stark Ladder States . 56 3.5.3 Tunneling-Reduced Lifetime of Wannier-Stark Ladder States . 60 4 Terahertz Emission of Exciton Wannier-Stark Ladder Wave Packets in Semiconductor Superlattices 71 4.1 Intraband Dynamics Monitored in Terahertz Spectroscopy .......

  • Arxiv:1907.06282V2 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 1 Oct 2019

    Derivation of Wannier orbitals and minimal-basis tight-binding hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene: a first-principles approach Stephen Carr,1 Shiang Fang,1 Hoi Chun Po,2 Ashvin Vishwanath,1 and Efthimios Kaxiras1, 3 1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 2Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (Dated: October 3, 2019) Twisted bilayer graphene (TBLG) has emerged as an important platform for studying correlated phenomena, including unconventional superconductivity, in two-dimensional systems. The complex- ity of the atomic-scale structures in TBLG has made even the study of single-particle physics at low energies around the Fermi level, quite challenging. Our goal here is to provide a convenient and physically motivated picture of single-particle physics in TBLG using reduced models with the smallest possible number of localized orbitals. The reduced models exactly reproduce the low-energy bands of ab-initio tight-binding models, including the effects of atomic relaxations. Furthermore, we obtain for the first time the corresponding Wannier orbitals that incorporate all symmetries of TBLG, which are also calculated as a function of angle, a requisite first step towards incorporating electron interaction effects. We construct eight-band and five-band models for the low-energy states for twist angles between 1:3◦ and 0:6◦. The models are created using a multi-step Wannier pro- jection technique starting with appropriate ab initio k · p continuum hamiltonians. Our procedure can also readily capture the perturbative effects of substrates and external displacement fields while offering a significant reduction in complexity for studying electron-electron correlation phenomena in realistic situations.
  • Excitons in Boron Nitride Single Layer

    Excitons in Boron Nitride Single Layer

    Excitons in boron nitride single layer Thomas Galvani, Fulvio Paleari, Henrique Miranda, Alejandro Molina-Sánchez, Ludger Wirtz, Sylvain Latil, Hakim Amara, François Ducastelle To cite this version: Thomas Galvani, Fulvio Paleari, Henrique Miranda, Alejandro Molina-Sánchez, Ludger Wirtz, et al.. Excitons in boron nitride single layer. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics (1998-2015), American Physical Society, 2016, 94, pp.125303. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.125303. hal- 01323899 HAL Id: hal-01323899 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01323899 Submitted on 31 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Excitons in boron nitride single layer Thomas Galvani,1 Fulvio Paleari,1 Henrique P. C. Miranda,1 Alejandro Molina-S´anchez,1 Ludger Wirtz,1 Sylvain Latil,2 Hakim Amara,3 and Fran¸coisDucastelle3 1Physics and Materials Science Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, 162a avenue de la Fa¨ıencerie, L-1511 Luxembourg, Luxembourg, EU 2CEA, IRAMIS, SPEC, GMT, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 3Laboratoire d'Etude des Microstructures, ONERA-CNRS, BP 72, 92322 Ch^atillon Cedex, France (Dated: May 31, 2016) Boron nitride single layer belongs to the family of 2D materials whose optical properties are currently receiving considerable attention.
  • Wannier Functions: Ab-Initio Tight-Binding

    Wannier Functions: Ab-Initio Tight-Binding

    Wannier Functions: ab-initio tight-binding Jonathan Yates Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University Representing a Fermi Surface Accurate description of Fermi surface properties requires a detailed sampling of the Brillouin Zone Lead Fermi surface Al Fermi surface Representing a Fermi Surface • Accurate description of FermiFe fermi surface surface properties requires a detailedScalar sampling Relativistic of the Brillouin Zone with spin-orbit coupling • Full first-principles calculation expensive Lead Fermi surface Al Fermi surface Outline •Wannier Functions •One band •Isolated Set of Bands •Entangled Bands •Wannier Interpolation •Accurate and Efficient approach to Fermi surface and spectral properties •Examples •Anomalous Hall Effect •Electron-Phonon Coupling Wannier Functions V ik.R iφ(k) wnR(r) = ψnk(r)e− dk ψ (r) e ψ (r) (2π)3 nk − nk !BZ → Bloch state GaAs Wannier function Quantum # k -5 -5.5 Quantum # R -6 -6.5 -7 -7.5 -8 -8.5 -9 L G X K G Wannier Functions V ik.R iφ(k) wnR(r) = ψnk(r)e− dk ψ (r) e ψ (r) (2π)3 nk − nk !BZ → Bloch state GaAs Wannier function Quantum # k -5 -5.5 Quantum # R -6 -6.5 -7 -7.5 -8 -8.5 -9 L G X K G Si Multiband - Generalized WF 6 4 2 ψ (r) U (k)ψ (r) 0 nk → mn mk -2 n -4 ! -6 L G X K G Maximally Localised Wannier Functions Choose Uk to minimise V (k) k.R w (r) = U ψ (r) e− dk nR (2π)3 mn mk quadratic spread BZ " m $ ! # (Marzari, Vanderbilt) u u ! k| k+b" Ab-initio code Wannier code U (k) u WF defined in basis of | k! bloch states Si valence bands 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 Wannier localisation in R gives rot -6 (k) ψnk

  • (2019) Derivation of Wannier Orbitals and Minimal-Basis Tight-Binding

    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 1, 033072 (2019) Derivation of Wannier orbitals and minimal-basis tight-binding Hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene: First-principles approach Stephen Carr ,1 Shiang Fang ,1 Hoi Chun Po,2 Ashvin Vishwanath,1 and Efthimios Kaxiras1,3 1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 2Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 3John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (Received 14 July 2019; published 4 November 2019) Twisted bilayer graphene (TBLG) has emerged as an important platform for studying correlated phenomena, including unconventional superconductivity, in two-dimensional systems. The complexity of the atomic-scale structures in TBLG has made even the study of single-particle physics at low energies around the Fermi level, quite challenging. Our goal here is to provide a convenient and physically motivated picture of single-particle physics in TBLG using reduced models with the smallest possible number of localized orbitals. The reduced models exactly reproduce the low-energy bands of ab initio tight-binding models, including the effects of atomic relaxations. Furthermore, we obtain for the first time the corresponding Wannier orbitals that incorporate all symmetries of TBLG, which are also calculated as a function of angle, a requisite first step towards incorporating electron interaction effects. We construct eight-band and five-band models for the low-energy states for twist angles between 1.3◦ and 0.6◦. The models are created using a multistep Wannier projection technique starting with appropriate ab initio k · p continuum Hamiltonians. Our procedure can also readily capture the perturbative effects of substrates and external displacement fields while offering a significant reduction in complexity for studying electron-electron correlation phenomena in realistic situations.
  • 4 Wannier Functions and Construction of Model Hamiltonians

    4 Wannier Functions and Construction of Model Hamiltonians

    4WannierFunctionsand Construction of Model Hamiltonians Jan Kunesˇ Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences Praha, Czech Republic Contents 1Introduction 2 1.1 Electron in periodic potential . ...... 2 1.2 Whylocalizedbasis? .............................. .3 2Preliminaries 4 2.1 Orthogonal atomic orbitals . .... 4 2.2 Asymptotic behavior of Fourier coefficients . ......... 5 3Wannierfunctions 7 3.1 Basic definitions . .7 3.2 Existence of exponentially localized Wannier functions–singleband. 9 3.3 Existence of exponentially localized Wannier functions–compositebands. 11 3.4 Uniqueness . 12 4NumericalmethodsforconstructionofWannierfunctions 13 4.1 Maximally localized Wannier functions . ....... 13 4.2 Projection method . .15 4.3 Entangled bands . 15 5Examplesofapplications 16 5.1 Wide versus narrow energy window: SrVO3 ................... 17 5.2 Unfolding band structures: LaOFeAs . ...... 18 5.3 Entangled bands . 20 5.4 Spin-orbit coupling: Sr2IrO4 ........................... 21 5.5 Wannier functions in dynamical mean-field theory . ......... 22 6Summary 24 Eva Pavarini, Erik Koch, Dieter Vollhardt, and Alexander Lichtenstein (eds.) The LDA+DMFT approach to strongly correlated materials Forschungszentrum Jülich 2011, ISBN 978-3-89336-734-4 4.2 Jan Kuneˇs 1Introduction Although introduced already in 1937, Wannier functions might be enjoying their ’golden age’ right now, thanks to the rapid growth of methods linking first-principles band structure calcu- lations with model theories based on the second quantizationformalism,suchasLDA+DMFT. While using Wannier functions as a computational tool is the likely goal of the reader, there is another fascinating aspect of Wannier functions, namely the connection between the spatial localization of Wannier functions and the topological properties of the corresponding Bloch states. It is this topology that gave the name to the topological insulators.
  • Solid State Theory I Alexander Shnirman Institute TKM, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany (Dated: January 10, 2019)

    Solid State Theory I Alexander Shnirman Institute TKM, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany (Dated: January 10, 2019)

    Solid State Theory I Alexander Shnirman Institute TKM, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany (Dated: January 10, 2019) 1 Contents I. General Information 7 II. Born-Oppenheimer approximation 7 III. Bravais and Reciprocal Lattices 9 IV. Bloch Theorem 10 A. 1-st proof 10 B. Born-von Karmann boundary conditions 12 C. 2-nd proof 13 D. Properties of the Bloch states 14 V. Almost free electrons. 16 A. Example in 1D 18 B. Lattice with basis, structure factor 19 VI. Bands, Fermi surface, Isolators, Semiconductors, Metals. 20 VII. Tight binding 21 A. Wannier functions 21 B. Schr¨odinger equation for Wannier functions 21 C. Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) 22 D. Single orbital (s states), one band 24 E. Alternative formulation of tight-binding method 24 VIII. Dynamics of Bloch electrons 26 A. Semi-classical equation of motion of Bloch electrons 26 B. Wave packet argument 26 C. Proof for potential perturbation (not for vector potential) 27 D. Effective mass 29 1. Example 30 E. Classical equations of motion 30 F. Only electric field 31 2 G. Concept of holes 32 IX. Bloch electrons in magnetic field 33 A. Closed and open orbits 35 B. Cyclotron frequency 35 C. Semiclassical quantization (Bohr-Sommerfeld) of orbits 36 D. Berry phase and modification of Bohr-Sommerfeld 38 1. Transformation to the instantaneous basis 38 2. Geometric Phase 39 3. Example: Spin 1/2 39 4. Geometric interpretation 41 5. Modification of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization of cyclotron orbits 42 E. Magnetic susceptibility 42 1. Grand canonical ensemble 43 F. Bohr-van-Leeuven Theorem 43 X.
  • Wannier Functions and Construction of Model Hamiltonians

    Wannier Functions and Construction of Model Hamiltonians

    4 Wannier Functions and Construction of Model Hamiltonians Jan Kunesˇ Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences Praha, Czech Republic Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Electroninperiodicpotential . 2 1.2 Whylocalizedbasis? ............................... 3 2 Preliminaries 4 2.1 Orthogonalatomicorbitals . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4 2.2 AsymptoticbehaviorofFouriercoefficients . 5 3 Wannier functions 7 3.1 Basicdefinitions.................................. 7 3.2 ExistenceofexponentiallylocalizedWannierfunctions–singleband . 9 3.3 Existence of exponentially localized Wannier functions – composite bands . 11 3.4 Uniqueness .................................... 12 4 Numerical methods for construction of Wannier functions 13 4.1 MaximallylocalizedWannierfunctions . 13 4.2 Projectionmethod................................. 15 4.3 Entangledbands.................................. 15 5 Examples of applications 16 5.1 Wide versus narrow energy window: SrVO3 ................... 17 5.2 Unfoldingbandstructures:LaOFeAs. 18 5.3 Entangledbands.................................. 20 5.4 Spin-orbit coupling: Sr2IrO4 ........................... 21 5.5 Wannierfunctionsindynamicalmean-fieldtheory. 22 6 Summary 24 E. Pavarini, E. Koch, Dieter Vollhardt, and Alexander Lichtenstein The LDA+DMFT approach to strongly correlated materials Modeling and Simulation Vol. 1 Forschungszentrum J¨ulich, 2011, ISBN 978-3-89336-734-4 http://www.cond-mat.de/events/correl11 4.2 Jan Kuneˇs 1 Introduction Although introduced already in 1937, Wannier functions might be enjoying their ’golden
  • Maximally Localized Wannier Functions: Theory and Applications

    Maximally Localized Wannier Functions: Theory and Applications

    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 84, OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2012 Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications Nicola Marzari Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS), E´ cole Polytechnique Fe´de´rale de Lausanne, Station 12, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Arash A. Mostofi Departments of Materials and Physics, and the Thomas Young Centre for Theory and Simulation of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom Jonathan R. Yates Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom Ivo Souza Centro de Fı´sica de Materiales (CSIC) and DIPC, Universidad del Paı´s Vasco, 20018 San Sebastia´n, Spain and Ikerbasque Foundation, 48011 Bilbao, Spain David Vanderbilt Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8019, USA (published 10 October 2012) The electronic ground state of a periodic system is usually described in terms of extended Bloch orbitals, but an alternative representation in terms of localized ‘‘Wannier functions’’ was introduced by Gregory Wannier in 1937. The connection between the Bloch and Wannier representations is realized by families of transformations in a continuous space of unitary matrices, carrying a large degree of arbitrariness. Since 1997, methods have been developed that allow one to iteratively transform the extended Bloch orbitals of a first-principles calculation into a unique set of maximally localized Wannier functions, accomplishing the solid-state equivalent of constructing localized molecular orbitals, or ‘‘Boys orbitals’’ as previously known from the chemistry literature. These developments are reviewed here, and a survey of the applications of these methods is presented. This latter includes a description of their use in analyzing the nature of chemical bonding, or as a local probe of phenomena related to electric polarization and orbital magnetization.