DOCSLIB.ORG

Leadership Certificateleadership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leadership Certificateleadership 2 New York New 202 - 9 CASI Global CASI 201 Leadership CertificateLeadership CASI Global is the world’s leading certification body and offers world class certifications across multiple subjects. The distinguishing factor is that every program at CASI inculcates study of corporate social responsibility and sustainability. This goes in line with our mission to educate every citizen in CSR & Sustainability regardless of their education or professional background. CASI NY offers various programs including finance, marketing, human resources, engineering etc to school, college students, academicians and working professionals. The flagship program at CASI is the Global Fellow program aimed at CXO’s. CASI is originally from New York and now present across 52 countries. CASI is commonly known as the ‘Global certification body” The Leadership Level Certification program aims at preparing the student to understand implications of Social Responsibility and Sustainability across various streams of higher education. This program will help the students realize that Sustainability / Social CASI Global Responsibility has applications and implications regardless of the New York, USA chosen education / career path. www.casiglobal.us www.casi-india.com CASI New York; Reference material for ‘Leadership Certificate” Recommended for college students (material designed for students in India) Dear Students, It gives us great pleasure to welcome you to the CASI Global Community. Congratulations on successfully applying to this program. CASI Global, New York has been educating responsible citizens and citizen-leaders for our society. When you join the CASI community, you are embarking on a journey that is meant to be transformative – academically, socially, and personally. While at school we learn the basics of language, sciences and math, the educational system be it main stream or vocational is directed towards creating a better understanding of possibilities in life and career; & then as time progresses, the school children grow to college levels and then finally have a career…again main stream or vocational. Similarly learning the concepts of CSR and sustainable development alongside the basics helps them develop a holistic view of the world. Just like it is important for children to prepare themselves for life by undergoing training and education in mainstream; it is even more important that children have an exposure to societal concepts of CSR and elementary sustainable development information. Such an elementary knowledge or exposure to CSR & Sustainability concepts at a young age not only helps them be better citizens but lays a very strong foundation for higher education, be it sciences or engineering or management. The foundation has to be laid at a young age, a very young age. Each enrollee for the Global certification embarks on a journey to excel in life as a model citizen and is a brand ambassador for CASI Global New York. If there is anything we at the CASI Secretariats office can do to help you better navigate through this program, we hope you will let us know. We want you to feel a part of the rich and varied community that is CASI. We wish you a happy, healthy, and a fruitful year. We welcome you once again, to CASI, The Global Certification body for CSR & Sustainability. Warm Regards The Secretariat CASI Global, New York www.casi-india.com | www.casiglobal.us www.casiglobal.us | www.casi-india.com | CASI New York; The Global Certification body. Page 2 of 153 CASI New York; Reference material for ‘Leadership Certificate” Recommended for college students (material designed for students in India) This page has been intentionally kept blank www.casiglobal.us | www.casi-india.com | CASI New York; The Global Certification body. Page 3 of 153 CASI New York; Reference material for ‘Leadership Certificate” Recommended for college students (material designed for students in India) Contents Section One; Basics ..................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Question Answers ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2 What is Personal Social Responsibility (PSR)?................................................................................... 17 1.3 How Does an Individual Become Socially Responsible? ................................................................... 17 1.4 Student social responsibility ............................................................................................................. 18 1.5 Individual Social Responsibility ......................................................................................................... 18 1.6 Why Study ISR or SSR ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.7 Research suggests the following effects ........................................................................................... 19 1.8 What is CSR? ..................................................................................................................................... 19 1.9 Background of CSR, the thought process .......................................................................................... 19 1.10 The Counter View............................................................................................................................ 20 1.11 What is Sustainability? .................................................................................................................... 20 1.12 Triple Bottom Line........................................................................................................................... 21 1.13 The History and advancement of concepts of CSR & Sustainability ............................................... 21 1.14 How is Sustainability inter related to CSR ....................................................................................... 22 1.15 Why Should Companies have a CSR policy? ................................................................................... 23 Criticism of Sustainable Development .................................................................................................... 23 1.16 CSR within business; Hakuhodo DY Holdings .................................................................................. 24 Section Two; Ethics ..................................................................................................................................... 25 2.1 Ethical Behavior ................................................................................................................................ 25 2.2 Ethical behavior also means including the following values in your day to day life ......................... 25 2.3 TATA Steel & Wipro .......................................................................................................................... 26 2.4 Religion and Ethics ............................................................................................................................ 26 Section Three: Corporate Governance ....................................................................................................... 27 3.1 What is 'Corporate Governance' ....................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors .......................................................................... 27 3.3 Eight Elements of Good Governance ................................................................................................ 28 3.3.7. Accountability ........................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.8. Participation .............................................................................................................................. 29 Section Four; Sustainable Development Goals ........................................................................................... 30 4.1 POVERTY: .......................................................................................................................................... 30 www.casiglobal.us | www.casi-india.com | CASI New York; The Global Certification body. Page 4 of 153 CASI New York; Reference material for ‘Leadership Certificate” Recommended for college students (material designed for students in India) 4.2. ZERO HUNGER: ................................................................................................................................. 31 4.3. GOODHEALTH AND WELL BEING: .................................................................................................... 32 4.4. QUALITY EDUCATION: ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.5. GENDER EQUALITY: .......................................................................................................................... 33 4.6. CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION: .................................................................................................... 34 4.7. AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY: ................................................................................................. 34 4.8. DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: .................................................................................... 35 4.9. INDUSTRY,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Responsibility for the Impact of Domestic and Extraterritorial Tax Abuse on Women: Liechtenstein
    STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC AND EXTRATERRITORIAL TAX ABUSE ON WOMEN: LIECHTENSTEIN Background Memorandum Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 70th Session Geneva July 2-20, 2018 pertaining to the Fifth periodic report submitted by Liechtenstein Submitted by Kathleen Lahey, Professor, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University, with assistance from Moran Harari, Researcher, and Markus Meinzer and Liz Nelson, Directors, Tax Justice Network I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PROPOSED QUESTIONS This background memorandum outlines how Liechtenstein's domestic entity and tax laws combined with extremely low or zero tax rates for special entities, high levels of financial secrecy, and governance structures jeopardize women’s human and gender equality rights in Liechtenstein (i) at the domestic level, (ii) in ‘upstream’ countries from which extremely high net worth individuals, businesses, and investment entities transfer assets and income to Liechtenstein in order to reduce taxes they would otherwise have to pay to their countries of origin, and (iii) in ‘downstream’ countries in which local Liechtenstein branches and tax laws permit overseas investors and businesses to operate on low or tax free basis or to transfer lightly-taxed proceeds to no- or low-tax entities in Liechtenstein. This first section of this memorandum provides an overview of the context within which information pertaining to domestic entity and tax laws can affect women in Liechtenstein and in other countries involved in financial practices and flows, and poses key questions that may help assess the State party’s progress toward reducing the negative effects these legal, financial, and fiscal policies have on the status of women in Liechtenstein, as well as women in other countries affected by the domestic and extraterritorial impact of Liechtenstein laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Taaks Avoyd
    ikea: flat pack tax avoidance TAAKSTAAKS AVOYD AVOYD EMBARGO 12 FEBRUARY 2016 18:01 CET TAX DEPT CREDITS AUTHOR : Marc Auerbach A study commissioned by the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament Graphics and design : Capucine Simon [email protected] Cover and illustration : admk - Agency for design and multimedia concepts, Cologne, Germany - www.admk.de www.greens-efa.eu @GreensEP EMBARGOwww.facebook.com/greensefa/ 2 Greens/EFA Group - Flat pack tax avoidance contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – p 5 I - INTRODUCTION – p 6 II – IKEA : A FLAT PACK STRUCTURE ? – p 7 III – THE SECRETIVE DUTCH FOUNDATION THAT OWNS THE IKEA GROUP – p 10 IV – THE SECRETIVE LIECHTENSTEIN FOUNDATION THAT OWNS THE INTER IKEA GROUP – p 12 V – HOW IKEA IS AVOIDING TAXES THROUGH THE NETHERLANDS – p 15 Part 1 - set up a subsidiary in the Netherlands – p 15 Part 2 - send billions in tax-deductible royalties to your Dutch subsidiary – p 15 Part 3 - move royalties from the Netherlands to Liechtenstein to remain untaxed – p 17 VI - FROM BELGIUM TO LUXEMBOURG: USING TAX LOOPHOLES AFTER TAX LOOPHOLES – p 21 Coordination centres in Belgium – p 21 Ruling in Luxembourg for Inter IkEa – p 21 Notional Interest Deduction in Belgium for IKEA Group – p 22 VII – CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS – p 25 ANNEXES – p 28 EMBARGO 3 TAX DEPT IKEA TAX AVOIDANCE SCHEME < 300 x Stores 2 x Secret foundations 4 x Tax haven LIECHTENSTEIN (One in NL one in LIE) (NL, LIE, BE, LU) 1 x Friendly NL tax handling 1 x Sweetheart deal with Luxembourg Ikea Group subsidiaries (and other franchisees) reduce their profits by paying a 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter IKEA Holding B.V. Annual Report FY16
    SKOGSTA Bench, acacia €3995 * Dutch price (actual price may vary per country) Inter IKEA Holding B.V. Annual Report FY16 Annual Report Table of contents REPORT FROM THE MANAGEMENT BOARD ........................................................ 3 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET before profit appropriation ......................................... 10 CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT ......................................................................... 11 CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT ................................................................... 12 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ................................................... 13 COMPANY BALANCE SHEET before profit appropriation .................................................. 34 COMPANY INCOME STATEMENT ................................................................................. 34 NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ............................................................ 35 Other Information PROPOSED PROFIT APPROPRIATION ........................................................................... 40 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ............................................................................ 40 Inter IKEA Holding B.V. Annual Report FY16 Page 2 of 41 REPORT FROM THE MANAGEMENT BOARD (in millions of EUR, unless otherwise indicated) The Management Board of Inter IKEA Holding B.V. hereby presents its financial statements for the 8-month period ending 31 August 2016 (FY16). General Around the globe, a large number of franchisees
    [Show full text]
  • Ikea: Flat Pack Tax Avoidance TAAKSTAAKS AVOYD AVOYD
    ikea: flat pack tax avoidance TAAKSTAAKS AVOYD AVOYD TAX DEPT CREDITS AUTHOR : Marc Auerbach A study commissioned by the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament Graphics and design : Capucine Simon [email protected] Cover and illustration : admk - Agency for design and multimedia concepts, Cologne, Germany - www.admk.de www.greens-efa.eu @GreensEP www.facebook.com/greensefa/ 2 Greens/EFA Group - Flat pack tax avoidance contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – p 5 I - INTRODUCTION – p 6 II – IKEA : A FLAT PACK STRUCTURE ? – p 7 III – THE SECRETIVE DUTCH FOUNDATION THAT OWNS THE IKEA GROUP – p 10 IV – THE SECRETIVE LIECHTENSTEIN FOUNDATION THAT OWNS THE INTER IKEA GROUP – p 12 V – HOW IKEA IS AVOIDING TAXES THROUGH THE NETHERLANDS – p 15 Part 1 - set up a subsidiary in the Netherlands – p 15 Part 2 - send billions in tax-deductible royalties to your Dutch subsidiary – p 15 Part 3 - move royalties from the Netherlands to Liechtenstein to remain untaxed – p 17 VI - FROM BELGIUM TO LUXEMBOURG: USING TAX LOOPHOLES AFTER TAX LOOPHOLES – p 21 Coordination centres in Belgium – p 21 Ruling in Luxembourg for Inter IKEA – p 21 Notional Interest Deduction in Belgium for IKEA Group – p 22 VII – CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS – p 25 ANNEXES – p 28 3 TAX DEPT IKEA TAX AVOIDANCE SCHEME < 300 x Stores 2 x Secret foundations 4 x Tax havens LIECHTENSTEIN (One in NL one in LIE) (NL, LIE, BE, LU) 1 x Friendly NL tax handling 1 x Sweetheart deal with Luxembourg Ikea Group subsidiaries (and other franchisees) reduce their profits by paying a 1. 3% royalty fee, going to the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Ownership at IKEA 1 2
    Foundation Ownership at IKEA 1 2 Steen Thomsen3 Center for Corporate Governance Copenhagen Business School 27 August 2018 Overview This case study examines the governance role played by the Interogo Foundation as the owner of the Inter IKEA Group (the owner and franchisor of the Ikea concept) and its other subsidiaries. The IKEA businesses are the largest home furnishing operation in the world. In total, the various companies have around 200.000 employees and annual revenues exceeding €38.3 billion. The IKEA businesses have exhibited impressive self-financed growth since their inception in 1943. During the 1980s, the original IKEA business was divided into three independent holding companies owned respectively by two independent foundations and the third part owned by the founding Kamprad Family. In addition, the IKEA franchise businesses also include a number of other franchisees owned by listed companies or private owners. 1 This paper is part of The Research project on Industrial Foundations at the Center for Corporate Governance, Copenhagen Business School. See www.tifp.dk for more information about this project. 2 I am deeply grateful to Anders Bylund, Johannes Burger, Hans Gydell, Søren Hansen, Fredrik Lagerbielke, Per Ludvigsson and Hans Christian Madsen for helpful interviews and inspiring conversations. Thanks especially to Anders Bylund who helped me with drawing graphs and fact checking. 3 Professor, Center for Corporate Governance, Copenhagen Business School, e-mail [email protected]. 1 The IKEA world IKEA is a brand name, and not a single company or business group. The IKEA businesses consist of 12 different, independent groups of companies.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Open About the Way We Are Structured Ingvar Kamprad Comments
    We are open about the way we are structured Ingvar Kamprad comments “Already back in the 60’s, I started to look for ways to ensure IKEA could be kept as a private company to secure true financial independence and thus the freedom to have a long term view on our investments and in business development. I have often referred to that as securing “eternal life” for IKEA. At that time, the wealth tax and inheritance tax (in combination with income tax) regime in Sweden was unsuitable for private ownership so I was forced to look for other options. I didn’t want to take IKEA public and lose control. My solution was to set up what was to become the current franchise structure with the two separate companies: Inter IKEA and IKEA Group – owned by two separate foundations. I decided to give IKEA to those independent foundations. By doing so I relinquished the rights to ownership and future earnings but retained some influence on the future direction of the companies. My main interest lie in securing that IKEA could continue to operate with the same purpose and set of values that I felt had been the formula for IKEA’s success – even after I personally relinquish control or pass away. This could be best accomplished by the foundation structure. My priority was to ensure that the majority of profits would either be reinvested in the business or used for philanthropic purposes. As an emerging global company, I also had to ensure that we were structured in tax efficient ways to avoid the burden of double taxation.
    [Show full text]
  • State Responsibility for the Impact of Domestic and Extraterritorial Tax Abuse on Women: Luxembourg
    STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC AND EXTRATERRITORIAL TAX ABUSE ON WOMEN: LUXEMBOURG Background Memorandum Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 69th Session Geneva February 19-March 9, 2018 pertaining to the combined sixth and seventh period reports of Luxembourg Submitted by Kathleen Lahey, Faculty of Law, Queen's University research and editorial assistance provided by Liz Nelson, Director, Tax Justice Network and Jasdeep Kaur, Law '19, Queen's University I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PROPOSED QUESTIONS This background memorandum outlines how Luxembourg’s domestic corporate, trust, charitable, and not-for-profit laws combined with extremely low or zero tax rates for multinational entities, high levels of financial secrecy, and lax rules on corporate reporting jeopardize women’s human and gender equality rights in Luxembourg (i) at the domestic level, (ii) in ‘upstream’ countries from which extremely high net worth individuals, businesses, and investment entities transfer assets and income to Luxembourg in order to reduce taxes they would otherwise have to pay to their countries of origin, and (iii) in ‘downstream’ countries in which local tax laws permit multinational corporations to operate on a virtually tax free basis and to transfer them to no- or low-tax entities in Luxembourg. This memorandum identifies key questions that may help assess the State party’s progress toward reducing the negative effects these fiscal and financial policies have on the status of women in Luxembourg as well as women in other countries affected by the extraterritorial reach of Luxembourg laws. As financial, corporate, and development activities have become increasingly transnational, tax cuts and tax havens have been used by countries at all levels of development to attract foreign investment and increase their GDP growth rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Taaks Avoyd
    ikea: flat pack tax avoidance TAAKSTAAKS AVOYD AVOYD EMBARGO 12 FEBRUARY 2016 18:01 CET TAX DEPT CREDITS AUTHOR : Marc Auerbach A study commissioned by the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament Graphics and design : Capucine Simon [email protected] Cover and illustration : admk - Agency for design and multimedia concepts, Cologne, Germany - www.admk.de www.greens-efa.eu @GreensEP EMBARGOwww.facebook.com/greensefa/ 2 Greens/EFA Group - Flat pack tax avoidance contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – p 5 I - INTRODUCTION – p 6 II – IKEA : A FLAT PACK STRUCTURE ? – p 7 III – THE SECRETIVE DUTCH FOUNDATION THAT OWNS THE IKEA GROUP – p 10 IV – THE SECRETIVE LIECHTENSTEIN FOUNDATION THAT OWNS THE INTER IKEA GROUP – p 12 V – HOW IKEA IS AVOIDING TAXES THROUGH THE NETHERLANDS – p 15 Part 1 - set up a subsidiary in the Netherlands – p 15 Part 2 - send billions in tax-deductible royalties to your Dutch subsidiary – p 15 Part 3 - move royalties from the Netherlands to Liechtenstein to remain untaxed – p 17 VI - FROM BELGIUM TO LUXEMBOURG: USING TAX LOOPHOLES AFTER TAX LOOPHOLES – p 21 Coordination centres in Belgium – p 21 Ruling in Luxembourg for Inter IkEa – p 21 Notional Interest Deduction in Belgium for IKEA Group – p 22 VII – CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS – p 25 ANNEXES – p 28 EMBARGO 3 TAX DEPT IKEA TAX AVOIDANCE SCHEME < 300 x Stores 2 x Secret foundations 4 x Tax haven LIECHTENSTEIN (One in NL one in LIE) (NL, LIE, BE, LU) 1 x Friendly NL tax handling 1 x Sweetheart deal with Luxembourg Ikea Group subsidiaries (and other franchisees) reduce their profits by paying a 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Dschungel Namens IKEA
    Attac - Bundes-AG Finanzmärkte und Steuern 10. Dezember 2013 Karl-Martin Hentschel, [email protected], 0175 245 3711 Ein Dschungel namens IKEA Inhalt Zusammenfassung ..................................................................................................................... 2 Das IKEA Konglomerat ............................................................................................................... 3 Ein kompliziertes Gebilde...................................................................................................................... 4 Das IKEA-Image ................................................................................................................................... 4 Ingmar Kamprad ................................................................................................................................... 6 Die INGKA Gruppe ...................................................................................................................... 7 INGKA Holding ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Die Stiftungen der INGKA Gruppe ........................................................................................................ 9 INGKA Foundation............................................................................................................................................. 9 IKEA Foundation ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enlightenment of IKEA's Multinational Operations to Chinese Enterprises
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 264 5th International Conference on Education, Management, Arts, Economics and Social Science (ICEMAESS 2018) Enlightenment of IKEA’s Multinational Operations to Chinese Enterprises ——From the Aspect of International Tax Planning Qingqing Wu*, Jie Peng School of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210000, China [email protected] Keywords: IKEA; International Tax Planning; Transnational Operation; Anti-tax avoidance; Abstract: In the exploration of operating internationally for Chinese enterprises, it’s remarkable to find how to maximize their comprehensive income better through the international tax planning. This paper analyzes the IKEA group’s company structure and tax policy, then it shows three revelations for Chinese enterprises in transnational operation to seek more favorable tax status. 1. Introduction International tax planning refers to multinational corporations complying with the tax laws of various countries and international tax treaties during the course of business operations, and make reasonable arrangements for taxable activities such as investment and operations, so as to minimize the overall tax burden of multinational corporations and maximize the company's own comprehensive income. In recent years, driven by the tide of economic globalization and the policy of “the Belt and Road”, China’s foreign investment has been increasing significantly. More and more local companies have gone abroad to seek cheaper production costs, more advanced technologies and management and wider overseas markets. It have become more active and involved in global competition. Therefore, it is worth paying attention to how to realize the maximization of the company's own comprehensive income through international tax planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Ikea Factura 62.000 Millones a Través De Holanda Para Tributar Menos
    Publicación El Economista General Fecha 09/09/2019 Soporte Prensa Escrita País España Circulación 16 822 Página 14 Difusión 12 492 Tamaño 477,55 cm² (80,3%) Audiencia 62 460 V.Publicitario 7160 EUR (8109 USD) Las cuentas de Ikea en Holanda una investigación al grupo. Bruse- las está analizando si Ikea utilizó Radiografía de las grandes sociedades El conglomerado accionarial de Ikea un autocrédito firmado en 2011 entre dos sociedades del grupo por impor- Ingka Holding BV IKEA te de 5.400 millones de euros para Ingresos (millones de euros) Resultados (millones de euros) desviar beneficios a Liechtenstein. Interogo Holding AG, una sociedad domiciliada en el pequeño país cen- 35.074 36.295 37.050 troeuropeo, concedió el préstamo a la holandesa Inter Ikea Systems 4.200 Stichting Ingka Interogo Foundation Foundation (Lichtenstein) BV para que ésta adquiriera a su vez 2.473 (Holanda) los derechos sobre la marca a una 1.478 tercera en Luxemburgo, I.I. Hol- ding. 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Inter Ikea Holding Tal y como informó hace dos años (Luxemburgo) elEconomista con la documenta- ción de los registros mercantiles Inter Ikea Ingka Holding tanto de Holanda como de Luxem- Ingresos (millones de euros) Resultados (millones de euros) (Holanda) burgo, la operación se cerró por un Inter Ikea Systems importe total 9.000 millones de 24.894 (Holanda) euros. 23.188 Contencioso fiscal en España 1.705 En España, la filial ibérica de Ikea 1.153 ha tenido que pagar por su parte a 1.478 329 la Agencia Tributaria (Aeat) una n/d Tiendas y centros de Franquicia y multa de 62,2 millones de euros por 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 producción propiedad intelectual el impuesto de sociedades, el IVA y el IRPF correspondiente al perío- Fuente: Registro Mercantil de Holanda.
    [Show full text]