David A. White Derrida on Being As Presence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

David A. White Derrida on Being As Presence David A. White Derrida on Being as Presence David A. White Derrida on Being as Presence Questions and Quests Managing Editor: Anna Michalska ISBN 978-3-11-054013-0 e- ISBN 978-3-11-054033-8 ISBN EPUB 978-3-11-054014-7 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. © 2017 David A. White Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Managing Editor: Anna Michalska www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © firebrandphotography There are few things that we phrase properly; most things we phrase badly: but what we are trying to say is understood. Augustine, The Confessions, Book XI, Section XX ...the sentiment that words were acts and acts were steps in life.... Henry James, The American For last year’s words belong to last year’s language And next year’s words await another voice. T. S. Eliot, “Little Gidding” from Four Quartets Contents Preface XIII Abbreviations XVI Part I: Presence and the History of Metaphysics 1 Being as Presence: Systemic Considerations 2 1.1 Principles of Interpretation: Procedures and Scope 2 1.2 Derrida’s Narrational Strategy 4 1.3 The Deployment of Presence 5 1.3.1 Truth and Language 5 1.3.2 Presence and the History of Metaphysics 6 1.3.3 Presence and Difference 10 1.4 Presence: Linearity and Process 10 1.5 Presence and the Metaphysics of Form 12 1.6 Being as Presence–the “Subjective” Turn 14 1.6.1 Presence, Form, Consciousness 14 1.6.2 Modulated Possibilities 17 1.7 The “Transcendental Signified” 19 1.8 Particularity 22 1.9 Presence and the Principle of Identity 23 1.10 Presence and Différance 25 1.10.1 Sameness and Invariance 25 1.10.2 Form and Opposition 30 1.11 Presence, the History of Metaphysics, Closure 30 1.12 Summary: In Quest of Being as Presence 32 2 Presence and the Question of Evidence 34 2.1 Being as Presence: The Possibility of Demonstration 34 2.2 Form, Presence and Evidence 36 2.3 Form and Presence: Along the Gamut of Exhibition 38 2.4 Plato’s Phaedo: Form and Experience 39 2.5 Formality: Appearance and Visibility 40 2.6 Formality: Presence and “Sight as eidos” 41 2.7 Presence and the Autonomy of Platonic Forms 42 2.8 Plato, Presence, Particularity 44 2.9 Formality and Essence 45 2.10 Plato and the Possibility of Presence 47 2.11 Formality: Plato, Aristotle, Presence 49 2.12 Formality and Presence–Question and Quest 50 3 Being as Presence: Transcendental Dimensions 54 3.1 A Transcendental Strategy 54 3.2 Form and Consciousness 57 3.3 Relationality: Presence and Contrast 59 3.4 Intersectionality: Presence, Sameness, Difference 60 3.5 Directionality: Presence on the Move 65 3.6 Being as Presence: Structure, Questions, Quests 67 3.6.1 Foundational Elements 67 3.6.2 Structural Factors 67 3.7 Difference, Différance, Deconstruction 82 3.8 Being as Presence and Logic 83 3.9 Summary and Provisional Conclusion 86 Part II: The Aggregations of Language 4 Signification:Meaning and Referentiality 90 4.1 The Question of Language: Introduction 90 4.2 Setting the (Linguistic) Scene.... 92 4.3 Language: Signification and the Possibility of Meaning 93 4.4 The Transcendental Factor 94 4.5 Presence: Evidence and “the other” 96 4.6 Presence and Opposition 97 4.7 Presence and the Origin of Metaphysics 98 4.8 Opposition, Language, Signification 99 4.9 The Unity of Language 99 4.10 Language, Logic, Presence 101 4.11 Reasoning to the Roots of Language 103 4.11.1 Language–Questions and Observations 104 4.11.2 Writing–Questions and Observations 105 4.12 Sign: Self-reference and the Signified 108 4.13 Signification and Opposition:the Sensible and the Intelligible 111 4.14 Signification and the History of Metaphysics 116 4.15 Referentiality and Signification–the Question of Stability 118 4.16 Summary and Prospect 122 5 Context and Concept 126 5.1 The Question of Contexts 126 5.2 Concepts: A Presentation of Context 129 5.3 Différance and Conceptuality 130 5.4 Concepts and Presence 131 5.5 The Structure of Chains 133 5.5.1 Self-identity 134 5.5.2 Relationality 135 5.5.3 Concepts and Otherness 135 5.5.4 Principles of Gathering 136 5.5.5 Différance and the Origin of Concepts 136 5.5.6 The Extension of the Transcendental 137 5.6 Chains and Referentiality 138 5.7 Chains and Signification 138 5.8 Chains: the Interplay of Unity and Limit 140 5.9 Deconstruction and the Question of Unity 142 5.10 Différance, Chains and Possibility 143 5.10.1 Novelty 143 5.10.2 History 144 5.10.3 Givenness 144 5.10.4 Logic 144 5.10.5 Transcendental Dimension 145 5.11 Chains and Contexts Revisited 145 5.11.1 Metaphysical Assumptions for the Promulgation of Chains 145 5.11.2 Chains and Contexts–Isomorphic Assumptions 147 5.11.3 Concepts and Contexts–the Challenge of Inclusive Preconditions 148 5.12 Summary 150 6 Traces of Negation 153 6.1 Différance and Language 153 6.2 Signification and Différance 154 6.3 Trace, Temporality, Negation 157 6.3.1 The Patrimony of Trace 158 6.3.2 Temporality 159 6.3.3 The Question of Negation 160 6.3.4 Trace, Presence, Negation 162 6.3.5 The Factor of Sameness 163 6.4 The Duality of Interval 164 6.5 Interval and Unity 166 6.6 Interval: Division of the Present and Beyond... 167 6.7 Division: Words and Objects 168 6.7.1 Language and Concepts 169 6.7.2 Space, Time, Transcendentality 170 6.8 The Question of Individuation 172 6.9 Trace: the Transcendental Character of Possibility 174 6.10 Summary 175 7 Iterability 177 7.1 Iterability and Presence–The Transcendental Mirror 177 7.2 Derrida on Possibility and Necessity: A Critical Review 179 7.3 Iterability and Absence: the Question of Negation 183 7.4 Iterability and the Possibility of Parody 187 7.5 Possibility and the Concept of Supplement 191 7.6 The “Logic of Supplementarity” 193 7.6.1 Supplementarity: Logical Structure 193 7.6.2 Supplementarity and Metaphysics 199 7.6.3 Supplementarity and Possibility 201 7.7 Derrida and the Fact of Writing 203 7.8 Iterability: Singularity and Self-identity 206 7.8.1 Repetition and Singularity 207 7.8.2 Sign and the Structure of Repetition 209 7.8.3 Ideality 216 7.9 Iterability: The Deconstructive Account vs. the Metaphysical Account 216 7.9.1 Language and Immediacy 217 7.9.2 The Conceptual Realm 218 7.9.3 Particularity 219 7.9.4 Self-identity 221 7.10 Iterability: A Transcendental Snapshot 222 7.11 Summary and Prospect 223 Part III: Presence, Language, Metaphysics 8 The Foundation of Deconstruction: Generalities at Play 228 8.1 Dimensions of Totality 228 8.2 Convergent Totalities: An Isomorphic Play 233 8.3 “Formal” Entities and the Texts of Deconstruction 235 8.3.1 Unity 236 8.3.2 Sameness as Self-identity 238 8.3.3 Difference 243 8.4 The Clash of Isomorphic Totalities 246 8.5 Self-reference: Deconstruction and Interpretive Limits 248 8.6 The Integrity of Deconstruction 250 8.6.1 Internal Inconsistency 251 8.6.2 External Inconsistency 252 8.6.3 Being as Presence and Deconstruction: The Question of Priority 253 8.7 Deconstruction, Presence and the Play of Consequences 254 8.7.1 The Ontologizing of Language 255 8.7.2 Particularity, Signification, Concepts 257 8.7.3 Opposition 258 8.7.4 Logic, Self-reference and the Rise of the Rhetorical 262 8.7.5 The Primacy of Difference 263 8.8 Deconstruction and “Making a Difference” 266 9 The Deconstruction of Deconstruction: Prelude to a Metaphysics 269 9.1 Derrida’s Truth 270 9.2 “As we speak....” 271 9.3 Deconstruction and the Margins of Self-reference 272 9.4 The Possibility of Stability 273 9.5 Presence, Closure, Trace 274 9.6 Approaching the Possibility of “Metaphysics” 276 9.7 Trace and the Elements of “Metaphysics” 278 9.7.1 Form, Sign, Possibility 278 9.7.2 Presence, Non-sense, Différance 279 9.7.3 “Non-presence” and Negation 280 9.7.4 Opposition and Possibility 282 9.7.5 The Matter of Excess 283 9.7.6 Non-presence: Otherness and the Transcendental Dimension 285 9.8 Trace and Irruption: The Factor of Surprise 287 9.8.1 History and Source 287 9.8.2 Epoch and Sequence 288 9.8.3 The Determination of Surprises 288 9.8.4 Surprise and Différance 289 9.8.5 The Limits of Surprises 290 9.8.6 The Content of Surprises–A Proposal 290 9.8.7 Trace, Surprise and the Possibility of Assimilation 291 9.8.8 The Accessibility of Irruptions 291 9.9 Deconstruction and the Possibility of Categorization 293 9.10 Summary: Closure and Surprise–the Code of Metaphysics 297 10 Toward a Deconstructed Metaphysics 299 10.1 Introduction 299 10.2 Speculative Preamble 301 10.3 Deconstructive Metaphysics: Structural Considerations 303 10.3.1 Assumption A: The Tentative Status of “Formal” Properties 304 10.3.2 Assumption B: The Arena of Language 306 10.4 Zones of Specificity:Applicable Contexts 307 10.4.1 Derrida vs.
Recommended publications
  • Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’S Destruktion of Metaphysics* Iain Thomson
    T E D U L G O E R · Internationa l Journal o f Philo sophical Studies Vol.8(3), 297–327; · T a p y u lo o r Gr & Fr ancis Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’s Destruktion of Metaphysics* Iain Thomson Abstract Heidegger’s Destruktion of the metaphysical tradition leads him to the view that all Western metaphysical systems make foundational claims best understood as ‘ontotheological’. Metaphysics establishes the conceptual parameters of intelligibility by ontologically grounding and theologically legitimating our changing historical sense of what is. By rst elucidating and then problematizing Heidegger’s claim that all Western metaphysics shares this ontotheological structure, I reconstruct the most important components of the original and provocative account of the history of metaphysics that Heidegger gives in support of his idiosyncratic understanding of metaphysics. Arguing that this historical narrative generates the critical force of Heidegger’s larger philosophical project (namely, his attempt to nd a path beyond our own nihilistic Nietzschean age), I conclude by briey showing how Heidegger’s return to the inception of Western metaphysics allows him to uncover two important aspects of Being’s pre-metaphysical phenomeno- logical self-manifestation, aspects which have long been buried beneath the metaphysical tradition but which are crucial to Heidegger’s attempt to move beyond our late-modern, Nietzschean impasse. Keywords: Heidegger; ontotheology; metaphysics; deconstruction; Nietzsche; nihilism Upon hearing the expression ‘ontotheology’, many philosophers start looking for the door. Those who do not may know that it was under the title of this ‘distasteful neologism’ (for which we have Kant to thank)1 that the later Heidegger elaborated his seemingly ruthless critique of Western metaphysics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Metaphysics of Presence Peter Eisenman
    Lateness: A Critique of the Metaphysics of Presence Peter Eisenman Colin Rowe used to say that one of the problems with architectural thought was that it saw itself in a state of perpetual crisis. Always focusing on the latest problem or issue, architecture was said to obey a crisis mentality, an attitude partly fueled by nostalgia for an impossible avant-garde and partly by the received notion that archi- tecture was actually about solving problems. But as Rowe also would have said, permanent crisis is no crisis at all. For many historians, crisis is part of an historical cycle. In his book Krisis. Saggio sulla crisi del pensiero negativo da Nietzsche a Wittgenstein (1976), the philoso- pher Massimo Cacciari suggests that a crucial change had taken place in the way modernity was perceived. This rupture, he argued, was a "crisis of foundations," which signaled the end of classical rationality and dialectics in philosophy. He suggested that a crisis of dialectical problem of the limit; it projects the crisis of techniques synthesis in fact underlay the history of the modern already given." "The real problem is how to project a phase of contemporary development. Cacciari's crisis of criticism capable of putting itself into crisis by putting dialectical synthesis opens architecture to the synthetic into crisis the real." In his terms, the historical "project" project. In another interpretation, Manfredo Tafuri saw is an open discursive construct. Rather than producing a the idea of crisis as productive. Tafuri considered history linear narrative of history, the crisis provoked by criticism as a project of crisis, in that historical work, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Derrida's Critique of Husserl and the Philosophy
    5 DERRIDA’S CRITIQUE OF HUSSERL AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRESENCE David B. Allison* Now would be the time to reject the myths of inductivity and of the Wesenschau, which are transmitted, as points of honor, from generation to generation. ...Am I primitively the power to contemplate, a pure look which fixes the things in their temporal and local place and the essences in an invisible heaven; am I this ray of knowing that would have to 1 arise from nowhere? SÍNTESE – O autor reexamina a crítica de Derrida ABSTRACT – The author reexamines Derrida’s à fenomenologia de Husserl de forma a mostrar critique of Husserl’s phenomenology, so as to como a sua coerência estrutural emerge não show how its structural coherency arises not so tanto de uma redução a uma doutrina particular, much from the reduction to a particular doctrine, mas antes das exigências de uma concepção but rather from the demands of a unitary concep- unitária, especificamente impostas pelas deter- tion, specifically from the demands imposed by minações epistemológicas e metafísicas da the epistemological and metaphysical determina- presença. tions of presence. PALAVRAS-CHAVE – Desconstrução. Derrida. KEY WORDS – Deconstruction. Derrida. Husserl. Fenomenologia. Husserl. Presença. Significado. Meaning. Phenomenology. Presence. * Doutor. Professor, State University of New York, Stony Brook, EUA. 1 Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Le Visible et l’invisible (Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1964), Eng. tr., Alphonso Lingis, The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968). pp. 113-116. VERITAS Porto Alegre v. 50 n. 1 Março 2005 p. 89-99 It is practically a truism to say that most of Husserl’s commentators have in- sisted on the rigorously systematic character of his writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Derrida's Objection to the Metaphysical Tradition
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Scholarship@Claremont Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2015 Derrida's Objection To The etM aphysical Tradition Christopher A. Wheat Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Wheat, Christopher A., "Derrida's Objection To The eM taphysical Tradition" (2015). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 1188. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1188 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Derrida’s Objection to the Metaphysical Tradition Submitted to Prof. James Kreines And Dean Nicholas Warner By Christopher Wheat For Senior Thesis Spring 2015 4/27/15 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………2 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………4 The Metaphysical Tradition…………………………………………………………...6 Derrida’s Objection…………………………………………………………………..16 Metaphysics Given the Abandonment of the Metaphysical Tradition………………26 Conclusion………………………………………………….………………………..31 Bibliography…………………………………………………………..……………..33 1 Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Professor Kreines for his generous assistance in my thesis and initial research of deconstruction, and for helping to nurture my interest in philosophy over the course of my college career. I would also like to thank Professor Rajczi, Professor Schroeder, Professor Kind, Professor Kincaid, and Professor Gaitskill. In addition to my professors, my friends and family have supported and influenced me in ways I could never begin to repay them for, and hope that this thesis is only a small reflection of what they have taught me. 2 Abstract Derrida’s deconstruction of the philosophic tradition shows us not only the importance of pursuit of knowledge, but also the importance of questioning the assumptions on which such a pursuit is based.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECTRES of a CRISIS: READING JACQUES DERRIDA AFTER the GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS of 2008 by JOHN JAMES FRANCIS a Thesis Submi
    SPECTRES OF A CRISIS: READING JACQUES DERRIDA AFTER THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008 by JOHN JAMES FRANCIS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern Languages School of Languages, Culture, Art History, and Music College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham JUNE 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates a theoretical response to the question of what constitutes the political implications of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. This thesis, working within the tradition of critical and cultural theory, undertakes a sustained engagement with the works of Jacques Derrida to theorise the traditions, norms, and practices that inform a response to an event such as the crisis of 2008. This thesis works with his proposals that: the spectre of its limitations haunts politics; that this has led to the ‘deconstruction’ of the meaning of politics through complex textual frameworks; and that this dynamic leads to a tension between the arrival of new political possibilities on the one hand and new forms of political sovereignty on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Derrida, Logocentrism, and the Concept of Warrant on the Semantic Web
    D. Grant Campbell — University of Western Ontario Derrida, Logocentrism, and the Concept of Warrant on the Semantic Web Abstract The highly-structured data standards of the Semantic Web contain a promising venue for the migration of library subject access standards onto the World Wide Web. The new functionalities of the Web, however, along with the anticipated capabilities of intelligent Web agents, suggest that information on the Semantic Web will have much more fl exibility, diversity and mutability. We need, therefore, a method for recognizing and assessing the principles whereby Semantic Web information can combine together in productive and useful ways. This paper will argue that the concept of warrant in traditional library science, can provide a useful means of translating li- brary knowledge structures into Web-based knowledge structures. Using Derrida’s concept of logocentrism, this paper suggests that what while “warrant” in library science traditionally alludes to the principles by which con- cepts are admitted into the design of a classifi cation or access system, “warrant” on the Semantic Web alludes to the principles by which Web resources can be admitted into a network of information uses. Furthermore, library information practice suggests a far more complex network of warrant concepts that provide a subtlety and rich- ness to knowledge organization that the Semantic Web has not yet attained. Introduction The concept of warrant in traditional library science has been a cornerstone of our under- standing of, and our training in, the major tools of subject access, including the Library of Congress Subject Headings, Library of Congress Classifi cation, and the Dewey Decimal Classifi cation.
    [Show full text]
  • Derridean Deconstruction and Feminism
    DERRIDEAN DECONSTRUCTION AND FEMINISM: Exploring Aporias in Feminist Theory and Practice Pam Papadelos Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Gender, Work and Social Inquiry Adelaide University December 2006 Contents ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................III DECLARATION .....................................................................................................IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................V INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 THESIS STRUCTURE AND OVERVIEW......................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS – FEMINISM AND DECONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 8 FEMINIST CRITIQUES OF PHILOSOPHY..................................................................... 10 Is Philosophy Inherently Masculine? ................................................................ 11 The Discipline of Philosophy Does Not Acknowledge Feminist Theories......... 13 The Concept of a Feminist Philosopher is Contradictory Given the Basic Premises of Philosophy.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vo» the RHETORIC of POSTHUMANISM in FOUR TWENTIETH- CENTURY INTERNATIONAL NOVELS DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Counci
    /vo» THE RHETORIC OF POSTHUMANISM IN FOUR TWENTIETH- CENTURY INTERNATIONAL NOVELS DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Lidan Lin, B. A., M. A., M. Ed. Denton, Texas August, 1998 Lin, Lidan, The Rhetoric of Posthumanism in Four Twentieth-Century International Novels. Doctor of Philosophy (English), August, 1998,195 pp., works cited, 182 titles. The dissertation traces the trope of the incomplete character in four twentieth-century cosmopolitan novels that reflect European colonialism in a global context. I argue that, by creating characters sharply aware of the insufficiency of the Self and thus constantly seeking the constitutive participation of the Other, the four authors E. M. Forster, Samuel Beckett, J. M. Coetzee, and Congwen Shen all dramatize the incomplete character as an agent of postcolonial resistance to Western humanism that, tending to enforce the divide between the Self and the Other, provided the epistemological basis for the emergence of European colonialism. For example, Fielding's good-willed aspiration to forge cross- cultural friendship in A Passage to India-, Murphy's dogged search for recognition of his Irish identity in Murphy; Susan's unfailing compassion to restore Friday's lost speech in Foe; and Changshun Teng, the Chinese orange-grower's warm-hearted generosity toward his customers in Long River-all these textual occasions dramatize the incomplete character's anxiety over the Other's rejection that will impair the fullness of his or her being, rendering it solitary and empty. I relate this anxiety to the theory of "posthumanism" advanced by such thinkers as Marx, Bakhtin, Sartre, and Lacan; in their texts the humanist view of the individual as an autonomous constitution has undergone a transformation marked by the emphasis on locating selfhood not in the insular and static Self but in the mutable middle space connecting the Self and the Other.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Eschatological Temporality, Or: ‘Bergson and the Reign of Theos’ Mark William Westmoreland Theology and Religious Studies Eschatology confronts us with a long list of problems. Clearly, the issue of temporality is one of these. How are we to conceive of time in the eschaton? How can we reconcile the biblical witness and church tradition with various philosophical accounts of temporality? This paper will demonstrate how Henri Bergson‟s philosophical notion of duration is applicable to theological discourse. I will accomplish this by (1) placing Bergson within the theological and philosophical tradition of Augustine and Kant, (2) comparing Bergson to two of his contemporaries, Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein, and (3) by describing Bergson‟s notion of duration. Throughout the paper, one will find mention of the phrases “the kingdom of heaven”/“the reign of God” and a discussion of how this may be understood in light of Bergson‟s theory. In conclusion, we will see that Bergson‟s duration offers a remedy to many of the ambiguities surrounding temporality and the eschaton. We often symbolize time as an hourglass or clock. “It is not easy,” writes Bergson, “to escape the image of the hour-glass.”1 The common way people conceive of time is by spatializing it.2 In doing so, we lose sight of what time actually is. This becomes highly problematic for theological discussions of eternal life. I think it would be safe to claim that heaven is not merely “a really long time.” For Bergson, “Real duration is what we have always called time.”3 Later, the notion of duration will be discussed at length.
    [Show full text]
  • Derrida and the Heidegger Controversy: Global Friendship Against Racism
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Derrida and the Heidegger Controversy: Global Friendship Against Racism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mt710wt Journal Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 3 Author Bevir, Mark Publication Date 2000 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California DERRIDA AND THE HEIDEGGER CONTROVERSY: GLOBAL FRIENDSHIP AGAINST RACISM By Mark Bevir I. CONTACT INFORMATION Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1950, USA. [[email protected]] II. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Mark Bevir is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley, USA. He is the author of The Logic of the History of Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). ABSTRACT This essay explores the ethical import of deconstruction through a reading of Derrida on Heidegger. In Of Spirit, Derrida traces through Heidegger’s writings the interplay of “spirit” and spirit. Spirit denotes an involvement with the question of Being, and in thus pointing towards a positive content, it embodies a metaphysical gesture in which a spiritual mission becomes the human essence. In Heidegger’s entanglement with National Socialism, he tied this spiritual mission to German self- assertion. “Spirit” is a concept under erasure that calls our attention to the absent Other. It reminds us of an ethical responsibility that is prior to ontology; it sets up a “cosmopolitanism” that precedes all particular identifications and so avoids spiritual racism. Derridean “cosmopolitanism” differs importantly from liberal universalism. From a Derridean perspective, liberal universalism remains insufficiently attune to the Other; it retains a metaphysical gesture, and so imperialistic and exclusionary tendency, akin to that found in Heidegger.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Systematic Theoretical Matrix for a Deconstruction of Metaphysics” in the Critical Work of Jacques Derrida’S “Writing and Difference”
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 4, Ver. 1 (April. 2017) PP 13-17 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org “A Systematic Theoretical Matrix for a Deconstruction of Metaphysics” In the Critical Work of Jacques Derrida’s “Writing and Difference” 1 2 Ms.Mohammed Zainab, dr.Khaja Moinuddin 1 Research scholar, Gondwana University, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, India 2Associate Professor,Dept.of English, Shree shivaji Maha vidyalaya, Rajura, Gondwana university, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, India ABSTRACT: The concept of the metaphysics of presence is an important consideration in deconstruction. Deconstructive interpretation hold that the entire history of Western philosophy with its language and traditions has emphasized the desire for immediate access to meaning, and thus built a metaphysics or ontotheology based on privileging presence over absence. Deconstructive thinkers, like Jacques Derrida, describe their task as the questioning or deconstruction of this metaphysical tendency in Western philosophy. Derrida writes, "Without a doubt, Aristotle thinks of time on the basis of ousia as parousia, on the basis of the now, the point, etc. And yet an entire reading could be organized that would repeat in Aristotle's text both this limitation and its opposite." This argument is largely based on the earlier work of Heidegger, who in Being and Time claimed that the theoretical attitude of pure presence is parasitical upon a more originary involvement with the world in concepts such as the ready-to-hand and being-with. Friedrich Nietzsche is a more distant, but clear, influence as well. Keywords: Interpretation, Deconstruction, Metaphysical, ontotheology I.
    [Show full text]
  • 41219 Manuscript
    This article is downloaded from http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au It is the paper published as: Authors: Russell Daylight Title: The passion of Saussure Journal Title: Language and Communication ISSN: 0271-5309 Year: 2012 Volume: 32 Issue: 3 Pages: 240-248 Abstract: Perhaps the best known and most influential of Jacques Derrida’s early, linguistically- oriented critiques concerns the relationship between writing and speech. This inquiry is directed towards a certain thread in the history of philosophy in which priority is given to spoken language over the written. It is Saussurean linguistics in particular that allows Derrida to posit the interdependence of phonocentrism, or the privilege of speech over writing, with logocentrism, or the desire for a true and universal experience of the world in the mind prior to the introduction of language. However, a close reading of this engagement suggests that Saussure might be phonocentric but not logocentric, and indeed, that it is possible to be phonocentric but not logocentric. URLs: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.003 http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/R/-?func=dbin-jump- full&object_id=41219&local_base=GEN01-CSU01 Author Address: [email protected] CRO Number: 41219 1 Title: The Passion of Saussure Author: Russell Daylight Lecturer in English Charles Sturt University Panorama Avenue Bathurst NSW 2795 Australia Tel. +612.6338.4028 Fax. +612.6338.4401 [email protected] Abstract: Perhaps the best known and most influential of Jacques Derrida’s early, linguistically-oriented critiques concerns the relationship between writing and speech. Derrida’s inquiry is directed towards a certain thread in the history of philosophy in which priority is given to spoken language over the written.
    [Show full text]