DOCSLIB.ORG

Nyayo House, Nairobi)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 2-28-2011 Public Hearing Transcripts - Nairobi - RTJRC28.02 (Nyayo House, Nairobi) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Public Hearing Transcripts - Nairobi - RTJRC28.02 (Nyayo House, Nairobi)" (2011). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 45. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/45 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORAL SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION ON TUESDAY, THE 28 TH FEBRUARY, 2012, AT NYAYO HOUSE, NAIROBI PRESENT Gertrude Chawatama - The Presiding Chair, Zambia Tecla Namachanja Wanjala - The Acting Chair, Kenya Berhanu Dinka - Commissioner, Ethiopia Tom Chavangi - Leader of Evidence (National Anthem and Prayer) (The Commission commenced at 10.30 a.m.) (The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama) introduced the Acting Chair, fellow Commissioner and herself) The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama): Good morning, we shall remain standing for the national anthem and the Commission prayer and after that we will observe a minute of silence in honour for those who died from torture. Thank you. (The Commission observed a minute’s silence) On behalf of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC), we wish to welcome you to today’s hearing. I must say that these are special hearings today in the sense that I believe that this is the first time, as a Commission, we have had an opportunity to sit at the site where violations that we are going to talk about today had taken place. It was befitting that we observe a minute of silence for the lives that have been lost through torture. It is also befitting that we observe a minute of silence in support of the survivors of torture and their families. We are very happy as a Commission to be here today. We know that issues of torture have been before the courts of Kenya. We are also aware that the courts have awarded some Kenyans. But as a Commission, it is important to have these hearings today because we are tasked to come up with a complete and accurate historical record. If these hearings do not take place, there would be a part of the history of this nation that would be left unrecorded. It is also befitting that these hearings are held because of recommendations that we will make as a Commission; which recommendations are mandatory and which are going to be implemented. Justice will be served and as a Commission, we are committed to the work that we are doing and we want to assure the victims, not only of torture, but other victims that we are committed to this process. Nyayo House, Nairobi 1 Tuesday, 28 th February, 2012 With me today on this panel are two Commissioners; there will be two other Commissioners who will join us. You will be interested to know that seven per cent of the 2,843 statements we received as a Commission were on torture. We received 696 statements from females and 2, 47 from the male. From Nyayo House, we received 24 statements, but the number is much more because there are many who did not record statements and they are many others who are related to people who were tortured and whom we did not have an opportunity to get statements from. The other statements came from those who were alleged to have been involved in the coup’d’état and their number was 158. We will observe a few rules as we sit here; we will observe silence and listen quietly to the testimonies of the witnesses. We will switch off our mobile phones because they disturb the equipment for recording these proceedings. I am sure you are aware that in a lot of instances witnesses do break down. As a Commission, we will allow for these with a lot of respect and we will give such witnesses an opportunity to compose themselves. Please co-operate with us because the testimonies which we will be given today will not be easy for these witnesses. We beg your indulgence to afford the witnesses the respect that is due to them, as Kenyans and as fellow human beings. We would like to thank the witnesses in advance for being courageous enough to come and speak to us; we acknowledge the pain that will accompany your testimonies. We thank you in the same way, Leader of Evidence. We are ready to proceed with the first witness. Thank you very much. Mr. Tom Chavangi : Thank you Presiding Chair and your fellow Commissioners. The first witness is Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai, who will speak on issues of human rights and how he was arrested, tortured and jailed for about 12 years on allegations that he was a member of an illegal group. He has worked extensively with torture victims and survivors. He will also speak on issue of torture that has visited him as a result of this. Thank you very much. (Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai took the oath) Mr. Tom Chavangi : For the record purposes, kindly state your name again. Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : My name is Kang’ethe Mungai . Mr. Tom Chavangi : Mr. Mungai, what do you do currently? Nyayo House, Nairobi 2 Tuesday, 28 th February, 2012 Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : I work as a human rights consultant currently, and also a volunteer in human rights centres in Kenya. Mr. Tom Chavangi : Presiding Chair and Commissioners, Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai is the last witness in the list of witness on the cause list, after lunch break. But we decided to bring him first, because of the issues that he is going to articulate. Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai, are you aware of what has brought you here? Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : Yes. Mr. Tom Chavangi : What you had gone through, that is torture and detention during the previous regime. Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : Yes. Mr. Tom Chavangi : Kindly, would you state to the Commissioners in a very brief manner how these issues were brought to you and how they were perpetrated. Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : Yes. Mr. Tom Chavangi : Thank you very much. Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : Honourable Commissioners, it all started when I was a university student. At university we were very concerned about the depression that was taking place in the country. So, we decided to do something about it and we started organizing with people outside the university. Some of the people we were working with very closely were my three brothers; Waweru Mungai, Guchache Mungai who is late now and Doge Mungai. Also there were my other very close relatives like Mungai wa Ruiru, my nephew, who died in Kamiti Maximum Prison. Gitau Nduati was later jailed for seven years and my uncle Njoroge Wanguthi who was later tortured here and jailed. We organized and formed an organization called “ Muungano wa Wazalendo wa Kuikomboa Kenya ” in short Mwakenya. Before that, there was an organization called the December, 12 Movement. So, what we were handling basically was that we set out to educate the Kenyan people about what was happening in the country and what they could do to make this country a nation that respects human rights and that allows freedom of its own people. Mr. Tom Chavangi : Sorry! Hon. Commissioners, Muungano wa Wazalendo wa Kuikomboa Kenya; for the purposes of our foreign Commissioners is a grouping of nationalists for the purposes of liberating Kenya. I was just keen on that interpretation. Nyayo House, Nairobi 3 Tuesday, 28 th February, 2012 The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama): Before you can proceed; Leader of Evidence, the Acting Chair needs some clarification. The Acting Chair (Commissioner Namachanja): Thank you. I thought also the last words of the witness were not translated into Kiswahili. Maybe after this translation, it can just go backwards, the sentences that he made before you we came in. Mr. Tom Chavangi : Okay. Very well Commissioners, it is understood. Mr. Mungai, before you said Mwakenya , there is something else you said. Can you say it again it for purposes of translation The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama): I can remind the witness. He said: “We set out to educate Kenyans on what was going on and---” Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : We set out to educate our people on what was going on in the country and what they could do to make this country a nation that respects human rights and allows the freedom of its own people, especially the democratic freedom which was lacking in this country. The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama): I am so sorry. We do not have problem with that now. You may continue. Mr. Kang’ethe Mungai : The newspapers, airwaves; the radios and television were not free; they were all controlled very tightly by the regime of that time, the KANU regime. So, we went out to create publications that were to speak freely about what was going on in the country and one of these publications was Mpatanishi, which was for our own internal education; educating the cadres of the struggle. Then there was another one for mass consumption which was called Pambana. Pambana was something that we were writing and distributing all over the country so that people could know the truth that was happening.
Recommended publications
  • Kenya.Pdf 43

    Kenya.Pdf 43

    Table of Contents PROFILE ..............................................................................................................6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Facts and Figures.......................................................................................................................................... 6 International Disputes: .............................................................................................................................. 11 Trafficking in Persons:............................................................................................................................... 11 Illicit Drugs: ................................................................................................................................................ 11 GEOGRAPHY.....................................................................................................12 Kenya’s Neighborhood............................................................................................................................... 12 Somalia ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Ethiopia ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Sudan..........................................................................................................................................................
  • The Kenya Gazette

    The Kenya Gazette

    SPECIAL ISSUE SN (APORTING RARY THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaperat the G.P.O.) Vol. CXX—N0. 118 NAIROBI,21st September, 2018 Price Sh. 60 GAZETTE NOTICE NO. 9744 CAUSENO.604 OF2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI By (1) Carolyne Sakasa Wasai and (2) Joyce Naliaka Wasai, both of P.O. Box 4585-00506, Nairobi in Kenya, the deceased's widow and PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION sister-in-law, respectively, through Messrs. J. M. Onyancha & TAKE NOTICEthat applications having been made in this court Associates, advocates of Nairobi, for a grant of letters of in: administration intestate to the estate of Julius N. M. Ombasa, late of Kisii South. who died at Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya, on 12th CAUSENO.637 OF 2013 January, 2010. By (1) Misheck Macharia Kamau, (2) Irungu Kamau and (3) CAUSE NO. 765 OF 2018 Jecinta Wacera Kamau, all of P.O. Box 66937-00200. Nairobi in By Frederick Mutemi Kivai, of P.O. Box 20816-00202, Nairobi in Kenya, the deceased's sons and daughter, respectively, for a grant of Kenya, the deceased’s widower, for a grant ofletters of administration letters of administration intestate to the estate of Joyce Wanjiku intestate to the estate of Brigid Mary Mutemi., late of Kaloleni, who Kamau, late of Murang’a. who died at Hamza. on 23rd March, 2012. died at Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya, on 10th May, 2015. CAUSENO. 2092 OF 2014 CAUSE NO. 789 OF 2018 By (1) Moses Kibandi Gichuru and (2) Loise Muthoni Kibandi, By (1) Barbra Mwende Nawii and (2) Janet Mumbe Nawii, both of both of P.O.
  • ISSUE-NO-1.Pdf

    ISSUE-NO-1.Pdf

    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY VISION GENERAL AND DEPARTMENT OF To be the best institution in the region in the provision of public legal services JUSTICE The Constitution of Kenya 2010, Office of and the promotion of a just, democratic and corruption-free nation the Attorney General Act No 49 of 2012 and Executive Order No 1 of 2016 outline MISSION the key functions of OAG&DOJ: To facilitate the realisation of good governance and respect for the rule of GOVERNMENT SERVING law through the provision of public legal services, protection and promotion of human rights and upholding of ethics and integrity. Principal Legal Adviser to the Government DID YOU KNOW (PUBLIC INFORMATION): Represent the National 1. The AG has right of audience in proceedings of Public Interest or Government in civil proceedings involving Public Property; and matters before foreign courts 2. The Office shall be the depository of all laws and local and and tribunals international documents, agreements and treaties signed for and on Legislative Drafting Services behalf of the Government; Negotiate, draft, vet and interpret 3. The Attorney General shall have custody of the Public Seal of the Agreements and treaties for the Republic of Kenya; Government 4. A State Counsel is an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya and is Policy on Administration of Justice appointed by the Attorney General by Gazette Notice; Coordination of Governance, 5. All State Counsel shall perform the functions of the Office with Justice, Law and Order Sector COMPLETE LOYALTY AND DEDICATION and shall
  • The Challenges of Reinvigorating Democracy Through Visual Art in 21St Century Nairobi

    The Challenges of Reinvigorating Democracy Through Visual Art in 21St Century Nairobi

    The challenges of reinvigorating democracy through visual art in 21st century Nairobi Craig Campbell Halliday 30 September 2019 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sainsbury Research Unit for the Arts of Africa, Oceania & the Americas School of Art, Media and American Studies University of East Anglia, Norwich This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived therefrom must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 1 Abstract This study examines the potential for contemporary visual art to reinvigorate democracy in 21st century Nairobi, Kenya, through an interdisciplinary investigation. The new millennium ushered in fresh hope for democratisation in the postcolonial East African country. In 2002, Daniel arap Moi’s 24 years of authoritarian rule ended. The opposition were victorious at the ballot box, instilling a belief amongst the electorate that formal political processes could bring change. However, the post-election violence of 2007/8 shattered such convictions. But, from this election result came a progressive Constitution and with it possibilities for creating change. These momentous events underscore Kenya’s topsy-turvy path towards democracy – a path whose trajectory is charted in the experience of ordinary Kenyans who believe in democracy’s value and their right to participate in politics and civil life. Artists, too, have been at the forefront of this ongoing struggle. This study draws on empirical research to demonstrate contemporary visual art’s capacity to expand ways of practising, experiencing and understanding democracy.
  • The Kenya Gazette

    The Kenya Gazette

    SPECIAL ISSUE THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaperat the G.P.O.) Vol. CXVII—No.35 NAIROBI, 2nd April, 2015 Price Sh. 60 GAZETTE NOTICE NO.2235 CAUSE NO. 2131 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI By John Cheretei, of P.O. Box 1, Nginyang in Kenya, the deceased’s father, through Messrs. Kerongo & Co., advocates of PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION Nairobi, for a grant of grant of administration intestate to the estate of Joseph Kasait Cheretei, late of Nginyang, who died at District TAKE NOTICEthat applications having been made in this court Hospital, Chemolingot in Kenya, on 1st January, 2011. in: CAUSE NO.642 OF 2006 CAUSE NO. 2710 OF 2013 By (1) Selinah Jepkoech Kibogy and (2) Margaret Chemutai By (1) Jane Wairimu Karanja and (2) Rose Wanja Karanja, both of Rugut, both of P.O. Box 408-00517, Nairobi in Kenya, the deceased’s P.O. Box 805, Murang’a in Kenya, the deceased’s daughters, for a widow andsister, respectively, through Messrs. Kamotho Maiyo & grant of grant of administration intestate to the estate of Julius Karanja Mbatia, advocates of Nairobi, for a grant of grant of administration Ng’ang’a, late of Nairobi, who died at Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya, on 4th December, 2007. intestate to the estate of Phillip Kimaiyo Kandie, late of Nairobi, who died along Langata Road, on 26th February, 2006. CAUSE NO. 1454 OF 2014 CAUSE NO. 1985 OF 2011 By (1) Betty Chepkorir Mosonik and (2) Erick Kiprono Mosonik, both of P.O.
  • Major Research Paper Uhuru Kenyatta Vs. The

    Major Research Paper Uhuru Kenyatta Vs. The

    1 Major Research Paper Uhuru Kenyatta vs. The International Criminal Court: Narratives of Injustice & Solidarity Stefanie Hodgins Student Number: 5562223 Supervisor: Professor Rita Abrahamsen University of Ottawa Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Date: July 23rd, 2015 2 Abstract The intent of this paper is to explore the dominant narratives used by Uhuru Kenyatta to discredit the legitimacy of the International Criminal Court within Kenya and Africa. Using a framing analysis as a theoretical approach, this paper identified four primary arguments, which pertained to issues of neo-colonialism, sovereignty, ethnic polarization, and national reconciliation. This paper argues that these arguments supported narratives of injustice and solidarity and were evoked by Kenyatta in order to mobilize a domestic and regional support base throughout the course of his trial at The Hague. This paper examines how these narratives were used in the context of the 2013 Kenyan election and at Kenyatta's various appearances at the African Union. Overall, this analysis offers new insights into the effectiveness of global criminal justice and considers the importance of addressing local perceptions and realities. 3 Table of Contents 1.0 - Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 - Theoretical and Methodological Approach ..................................................................................... 7 3.0 - Kenya's 2007-08 Post-Election
  • Mission Readiness Mandate the Mandate of the Ministry of Defence Is Derived from Article 241:1 (A), (B) and (C) of the Constitution of the Kenya Defence Forces Act No

    Mission Readiness Mandate the Mandate of the Ministry of Defence Is Derived from Article 241:1 (A), (B) and (C) of the Constitution of the Kenya Defence Forces Act No

    KENYA DEFENCE FORCES Majeshi YetuYetu VOLUME 17, 2020 Back to School 2021 New Dawn for Security Telecommunication Services Things to look out for in 2021; - Ulinzi Sports Complex - Space Science Advancement Mission Readiness Mandate The Mandate of the Ministry of Defence is derived from Article 241:1 (a), (b) and (c) of the Constitution of the Kenya Defence Forces Act No. 25 of 2012. Vision A premier, credible and mission capable force deeply rooted in professionalism. Mission To defend and protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic, assist and cooperate with other authorities in situations of emergency or disaster and restore peace in any part of Kenya affected by unrest or instability as assigned. Commitment The Ministry of Defence is committed to defending the people of the Republic of Kenya and their property against external aggression and also providing support to Civil Authority. Preamble The Ministry of Defence is comprised of the Kenya Army, the Kenya Air Force, the Kenya Navy, the Defence Force Constabulary and the Civilian Staff. Core Values To achieve its Mission and Vision, the Ministry is guided by its core values and beliefs namely: Apolitical: The Defence Forces will steer clear of politics and will remain steadfastly apolitical. The Civil Prerogative: The Defence Forces shall always subordinate itself to democratic Civil Authority and will treat the people of Kenya and its other clients with civility at all times. Loyalty and Commitment: The Defence Forces will uphold its loyalty and commitment to the Commander-in-Chief and the Kenya People of the Republic of Kenya through the chain of command.
  • The Kenya General Election

    The Kenya General Election

    AAFFRRIICCAA NNOOTTEESS Number 14 January 2003 The Kenya General Election: senior ministerial positions from 1963 to 1991; new Minister December 27, 2002 of Education George Saitoti and Foreign Minister Kalonzo Musyoka are also experienced hands; and the new David Throup administration includes several able technocrats who have held “shadow ministerial positions.” The new government will be The Kenya African National Union (KANU), which has ruled more self-confident and less suspicious of the United States Kenya since independence in December 1963, suffered a than was the Moi regime. Several members know the United disastrous defeat in the country’s general election on December States well, and most of them recognize the crucial role that it 27, 2002, winning less than one-third of the seats in the new has played in sustaining both opposition political parties and National Assembly. The National Alliance Rainbow Coalition Kenyan civil society over the last decade. (NARC), which brought together the former ethnically based opposition parties with dissidents from KANU only in The new Kibaki government will be as reliable an ally of the October, emerged with a secure overall majority, winning no United States in the war against terrorism as President Moi’s, fewer than 126 seats, while the former ruling party won only and a more active and constructive partner in NEPAD and 63. Mwai Kibaki, leader of the Democratic Party (DP) and of bilateral economic discussions. It will continue the former the NARC opposition coalition, was sworn in as Kenya’s third government’s valuable mediating role in the Sudanese peace president on December 30.
  • Decolonising Accidental Kenya Or How to Transition to a Gameb Society,The Anatomy of Kenya Inc: How the Colonial State Sustains

    Decolonising Accidental Kenya Or How to Transition to a Gameb Society,The Anatomy of Kenya Inc: How the Colonial State Sustains

    Pandora Papers: The Kenyatta’s Secret Companies By Africa Uncensored Published by the good folks at The Elephant. The Elephant is a platform for engaging citizens to reflect, re-member and re-envision their society by interrogating the past, the present, to fashion a future. Follow us on Twitter. Pandora Papers: The Kenyatta’s Secret Companies By Africa Uncensored President Uhuru Kenyatta’s family, the political dynasty that has dominated Kenyan politics since independence, for many years secretly owned a web of offshore companies in Panama and the British Virgin Islands, according to a new leak of documents known as the Pandora Papers. The Kenyattas’ offshore secrets were discovered among almost 12 million documents, largely made up of administrative paperwork from the archives of 14 law firms and agencies that specialise in offshore company formations. Other world leaders found in the files include the King of Jordan, the prime minister of the Czech Republic Andrej Babiš and Gabon’s President Ali Bongo Ondimba. The documents were obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and seen by more than 600 journalists, including reporters at Finance Uncovered and Africa Uncensored, as part of an investigation that took many months and spanned 117 countries. Though no reliable estimates of their net worth have been published, the Kenyattas are regularly reported to be one of the richest families in the country. The Kenyattas’ offshore secrets were discovered among almost 12 million documents, largely made up of administrative paperwork from the archives of 14 law firms and agencies that specialise in offshore company formations.
  • MAU MAU in NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS by Macharia Munene Introductory Remarks It Is Possible to Look at Mau Mau Co

    MAU MAU in NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS by Macharia Munene Introductory Remarks It Is Possible to Look at Mau Mau Co

    MAU MAU IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS By Macharia Munene Introductory Remarks It is possible to look at Mau Mau consciousness in terms of two overlapping phases of the Colonial and Post-colonial periods, represented by seminal publications which show the power of books to shape thinking and public consciousness. In the colonial period were Jomo Kenyatta’s 1938 Facing Mount Kenya, the Corfield Report in 1960. In the Post-Colonial period were John Nottingham’s The Myth of Mau Mau soon after independence, and Caroline Elkins’ 2005 Imperial Reckoning/Britain’s Gulag. Each represents a phase of consciousness with regard to the Mau Mau War and can be divided into the following segments: a. The Colonial Setting b. The shock of the Mau Mau War outbreak c. The attempted destruction of Mau Mau Consciousness d. Post-colonial ignoring or effort to rearrange Mau Mau Consciousness e. Limited revival of Consciousness The Attraction The attraction to Mau Mau consciousness is partly because there probably was no challenge to the European colonial state in Africa that captured as much global attention as the Mau Mau War in Kenya against the British and the Algerian War against the French.1 The Mau Mau War was bitter and the benefits did not always accrue to those who bore the brunt of the war.2 A few fighters benefited, but the rest appear to have been neglected. In contrast, those who had opposed the war or supported British colonialists seemingly benefited most, continue to benefit, and a feeling of betrayal cropped up that is often the subject of many debates.
  • CAPSTONE 20-2 Africa Field Study Trip Book Part II

    CAPSTONE 20-2 Africa Field Study Trip Book Part II

    CAPSTONE 20-2 Africa Field Study Trip Book Part II Subject Page Djibouti ....................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 2 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 21 Culture Gram .......................................................... 26 Kenya ......................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 35 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 56 Culture Gram .......................................................... 60 Niger .......................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 70 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 90 Culture Gram .......................................................... 94 Senegal ...................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 103 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 123 Culture Gram .......................................................... 128 Africa :: Djibouti — The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency Page 1 of 19 AFRICA :: DJIBOUTI Introduction :: DJIBOUTI Background: The French Territory of the Afars and the Issas became Djibouti in 1977. Hassan Gouled APTIDON installed an authoritarian one-party state and proceeded to serve as president
  • Ethnic Politics and the Constitutional Review Process in Kenya Laurence Juma

    Ethnic Politics and the Constitutional Review Process in Kenya Laurence Juma

    Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law Volume 9 | Issue 2 Article 3 3-1-2002 Ethnic Politics and the Constitutional Review Process in Kenya Laurence Juma Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Laurence Juma, Ethnic Politics and the Constitutional Review Process in Kenya, 9 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 471 (2001). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil/vol9/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ETHNIC POLITICS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW PROCESS IN KENYA t Laurence Juma I. INTRODUCTION When the Daniel Arap Moi regime in Kenya reluctantly acceded to the amendment of the Constitution to allow for multi-party politics in 1991,' many political observers and opposition groups believed that it was indeed possible to effect change of government and institute democratic governance through elections. The 1992 and 1997 elections proved them wrong. Moi is still in power, and neither the increased number of players in the political scene, nor the diminishing foreign aid allocations have shown the promise of ever tempering his dominance. 2 And yet his regime continues to stifle individual freedoms and rights,' fan ethnic indifferences, attract blame for political murders,4 and worst of all, tolerate the plunder of national resources for the benefit of a few through corruption and tLecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Nairobi, Kenya; currently a research fellow at the Danish Center for Human Rights, Copenhagen, Denmark; M.A., International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame; LL.M., University of Pennsylvania; LL.B., University of Nairobi.