DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosperous Bay Plain Invertebrate Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosperous Bay Plain Invertebrate Survey David Pryce Invertebrate Surveys Prosperous Bay Plain Invertebrate Survey 2018-19 David Pryce May 2019 CONTENTS Contents ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 List of figures .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of tables ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Survey design considerations ................................................................................................................................. 5 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 A – Main survey .................................................................................................................................................. 7 B – Temporal survey ......................................................................................................................................... 10 C – Gecko survey .............................................................................................................................................. 11 D – Spider eye-shine survey ............................................................................................................................. 11 E – Vegetation survey ....................................................................................................................................... 12 F – Site numbering ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Results .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 A – Main survey ................................................................................................................................................ 12 B – Temporal survey and Malaise trap ............................................................................................................. 16 C – Gecko survey .............................................................................................................................................. 17 D – Spider eye-shine surveys ............................................................................................................................ 18 E – Vegetation survey ....................................................................................................................................... 20 F – Malaise trap ................................................................................................................................................ 21 G – General species information ...................................................................................................................... 22 Analysis of sampling effectiveness ....................................................................................................................... 27 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................ 30 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................... 32 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................ 33 References ............................................................................................................................................................ 34 Appendix A – History of study .............................................................................................................................. 35 Appendix B – Previous surveys. ............................................................................................................................ 37 Appendix C – Gecko survey results ....................................................................................................................... 41 Appendix D – Pitfall trap locations ....................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix E – Main survey results ......................................................................................................................... 45 Appendix F – Temporal survey results .................................................................................................................. 47 Appendix G – Malaise trap results ........................................................................................................................ 63 Appendix H – Vegetation survey results ............................................................................................................... 65 Appendix I – Individual species information ......................................................................................................... 67 1 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Approximate extent of the 'Eastern Arid Area' as defined by the Ashmoles' survey sites (Ashmole & Ashmole, 2004a). ............................................................................................................ 3 FIGURE 2: The extent of the area surveyed during this project, as defined in the text above, and its relation to the Airport, runway and Airport access road. ................................................................... 4 FIGURE 3: Average monthly rainfall (upper graph) and temperature (lower graph) data from the MO station at Bottom Woods, plotted against the 2001-2019 average. .................................................. 6 FIGURE 4: Habitat map for the survey area. ........................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 5: A typical pitfall trap installation. ......................................................................................................... 9 FIGURE 6: The Malaise trap used at Lower Bone Gully. ...................................................................................... 9 FIGURE 7: Spider-eye shine from lycosid spiders at Prosperous Bay Plain, 24th February 2019. ..................... 11 FIGURE 8: Comparison of the number of species recovered from each site during the main survey, as compared to those recovered in 2003. ............................................................................................. 13 FIGURE 9: Comparison of all species found during the 2003 survey, the 2018 survey and both surveys for all species and endemic species. ................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE 10: Calculated scores for endemic taxa at each site from the 2003 and 2018 surveys. ......................... 16 FIGURE 11: The number of species recovered during the temporal surveys (excluding 'random' sites). ........... 17 FIGURE 12: Comparative photographs of spider eye-shine during a survey in 2011, with one taken during the current survey. ................................................................................................................ 18 FIGURE 13: Wolf spiders from the spider eye-shine survey. ............................................................................... 19 FIGURE 14: Some examples of invertebrates showing seasonal changes in abundance from the Malaise trap. ................................................................................................................................................... 21 FIGURE 15: Photograph of mature Bonapruncinia sanctaehelenae male (left) and female (right); scale in mm. ................................................................................................................................................... 23 FIGURE 16: Drawing of Bonapruncinia sanctaehelenae, reproduced from Basilewsky, 1977. ........................... 23 FIGURE 17: Probable new species of Opogona from the Stone Hill BugVac sample. .......................................... 25 Figure 18: Two wasps from the survey. ............................................................................................................. 26 FIGURE 19: Synthetic species accumulation curves produced using EstimateS software for the main survey. ............................................................................................................................................... 28 FIGURE 20: Synthetic species accumulation curves produced using EstimateS software for the Malaise traps from this survey and DPLUS040. .............................................................................................. 29 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: Summary of sampling methodologies used by the various surveys undertaken in the area. ............ 5 TABLE 2: Site numbers, names and abbreviations surveyed in 2003 and used in this report. .........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Short-Range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna of the Ravensthorpe Range
    THE SHORT-RANGE ENDEMIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE RAVENSTHORPE RANGE MARK S. HARVEY MEI CHEN LENG Department of Terrestrial Zoology Western Australian Museum June 2008 2 Executive Summary An intensive survey of short-range endemic invertebrates in the Ravensthorpe Range at 79 sites revealed a small but significant fauna of myriapods and arachnids. Four species of short-range endemic invertebrates were found: • The millipede Antichiropus sp. R • The millipede Atelomastix sp. C • The millipede Atelomastix sp. P • The pseudoscorpion Amblyolpium sp. “WA1” Atelomastix sp. C is the only species found to be endemic to the Ravensthorpe Range and was found at 14 sites. Antichiropus sp. R, Atelomastix sp. P and Amblyolpium sp. “WA1” are also found at nearby locations. Sites of high importance include: site 40 with 7 species; sites 7 and 48 each with 5 species; and sites 18 and 44 each with 4 species. WA Museum - Ravensthorpe Range Survey 3 Introduction Australia contains a multitude of terrestrial invertebrate fauna species, with many yet to be discovered and described. Arthropods alone were recently estimated to consist of approximately more than 250,000 species (Yeates et al. 2004). The majority of these belong to the arthropod classes Insecta and Arachnida, and although many have relatively wide distributions across the landscape, some are highly restricted in range with special ecological requirements. These taxa, termed short-range endemics (Harvey 2002b), are taxa categorised as having poor dispersal abilities and/or requiring very specific habitats, usually with naturally small distributional ranges of less than 10,000 km2 and the following ecological and life-history traits: • poor powers of dispersal; • confinement to discontinuous habitats; • usually highly seasonal, only active during cooler, wetter periods; and • low levels of fecundity.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors Affecting Longevity, Adaptability and Diapause Termination of Exochomus Quadripustulatus L
    Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 45(2), pp. 377-385, 2013 Environmental Factors Affecting Longevity, Adaptability and Diapause Termination of Exochomus quadripustulatus L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): A Predator of Lepidosaphes ulmi L. (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on Apple Khawaja Farooq-Ahmad COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan Abstract.- Adults Exochomus quadripustulatus L. were utilized to determine the effect of various environmental factors (mainly temperature) on the longevity, adaptability (hysteresis) and diapause termination either under controlled laboratory conditions or field insectary conditions. Newly eclosed male and female adults E. quadripustulatus from previously field collected pupae were studied for the lifespan of adults under different constant temperatures (15° and 20°C) and naturally fluctuating (ambient) temperatures using starved (no food), liquid diets (water, and 10% honey solution) and natural prey (mussel scale Lepidosaphes ulmi L.) on apple. Access to distilled water compared to starvation did not increase the longevity of adult but significantly prolonged the life span when honey solution was provided. Longevity in constant conditions and ambient depended on both temperature and food. Coccinellid E. quadripustulatus survived longer time (≥10 months) under field conditions on natural prey L. ulmi than under constant temperature (≤4 months). Prey L. ulmi was the best food for survival than 10% honey solution. The degree of adaptability (hysteresis) of adult E. quadripustulatus at alternating temperature regimes (ascending and descending) showed significant differences in feeding at decreasing temperature than increasing ones. The results indicate that, in natural conditions, the adult beetles may be well adapted if they are introduced to different climatic regions where it has not yet been tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera Communities of Raptor (Aves) Nests in Nova Scotia, Canada
    The Canadian Entomologist (2020), page 1 of 13 doi:10.4039/tce.2020.26 ARTICLE Diptera communities of raptor (Aves) nests in Nova Scotia, Canada Valerie Levesque-Beaudin1* , Bradley J. Sinclair2, Stephen A. Marshall3, and Randolph F. Lauff4 1Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada, 2Canadian National Collection of Insects and Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Plant Laboratory – Entomology, Central Experimental Farm, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada, 3School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada and 4Department of Biology, St. Francis Xavier University, 4130 University Avenue, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (Received 3 December 2019; accepted 9 March 2020; first published online 27 April 2020) Abstract The identity, richness, and abundance of true flies (Diptera) from the nests of three cavity-nesting raptors (Aves) were investigated in northern Nova Scotia, Canada. After fledging, flies were extracted from the nest mate- rial using Berlese funnels within an emergence chamber. Thirty-one species/morphospecies from 14 families were collected, including eight new records for Nova Scotia and two new records for eastern North America. Introduction Bird nests are micro-ecosystems with diverse communities of invertebrates, from ectoparasites to commensal species. Most studies of the arthropods in bird nests have focussed on the presence and impact of ectoparasites (Møller et al. 1990; Loye and Zuk 1991; Krištofík et al. 2001, 2002, 2003, 2007; Fairn et al. 2014), including fleas (Siphonaptera) (Phipps and Bennett 1974); mites (Acari) (Wasylik 1971); and nest-associated Diptera in the families Muscidae (Lowenberg-Neto 2008), Calliphoridae (Bennett and Whitworth 1991; Whitworth and Bennett 1992), and Carnidae (Cannings 1986a, 1986b; Dawson and Bortolotti 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Insects.*
    ANNALS OF The Entomological Society of America Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aesa/article/10/1/1/8284 by guest on 25 September 2021 Volume X MARCH, 19 17 Number 1 FOSSIL INSECTS.* By T. D. A. COCKERELL. In these serious days, it seems just a little grotesque that I should cross half a continent to address you on a subject so remote from the current of human life as fossil insects. The limitations of our society do indeed forbid such topics as the causes of the war or the evil effects of intercollegiate athletics; but I might have chosen to discuss lice or mosquitoes—any of those insects whose activities have before now decided the fate of nations. My excuse for avoiding these more lively topics only aggravates the offense, for it is the fact that I have never given them adequate attention, but have in the past ten years occupied myself with matters having for the most part no obvious economic application. There is, however, another point of view. Many years ago I had the good fortune to meet the eminent ornithologist, Elliott Coues, at Santa Fe. We spent a considerable part of the night discussing a variety of subjects, from spiritualism to rattlesnakes, and when we parted he made a remark which those who knew him will recognize as characteristic. He said, "Cockerell, I really believe that if it had not been for science, you would have been a dangerous crank!" Surely experience and history alike confirm the essential sagacity of the observa­ tion, as applied not merely to your lecturer, but to mankind in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaderni Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale Di Ferrara
    ISSN 2283-6918 Quaderni del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara Anno 2018 • Volume 6 Q 6 Quaderni del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara Periodico annuale ISSN. 2283-6918 Editor: STEFA N O MAZZOTT I Associate Editors: CARLA CORAZZA , EM A N UELA CAR I A ni , EN R ic O TREV is A ni Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara, Italia Comitato scientifico / Advisory board CE S ARE AN DREA PA P AZZO ni FI L ipp O Picc OL I Università di Modena Università di Ferrara CO S TA N ZA BO N AD im A N MAURO PELL I ZZAR I Università di Ferrara Ferrara ALE ss A N DRO Min ELL I LU ci O BO N ATO Università di Padova Università di Padova MAURO FA S OLA Mic HELE Mis TR I Università di Pavia Università di Ferrara CARLO FERRAR I VALER I A LE nci O ni Università di Bologna Museo delle Scienze di Trento PI ETRO BRA N D M AYR CORRADO BATT is T I Università della Calabria Università Roma Tre MAR C O BOLOG N A Nic KLA S JA nss O N Università di Roma Tre Linköping University, Sweden IRE N EO FERRAR I Università di Parma In copertina: Fusto fiorale di tornasole comune (Chrozophora tintoria), foto di Nicola Merloni; sezione sottile di Micrite a foraminiferi planctonici del Cretacico superiore (Maastrichtiano), foto di Enrico Trevisani; fiore di digitale purpurea (Digitalis purpurea), foto di Paolo Cortesi; cardo dei lanaioli (Dipsacus fullonum), foto di Paolo Cortesi; ala di macaone (Papilio machaon), foto di Paolo Cortesi; geco comune o tarantola (Tarentola mauritanica), foto di Maurizio Bonora; occhio della sfinge del gallio (Macroglossum stellatarum), foto di Nicola Merloni; bruco della farfalla Calliteara pudibonda, foto di Maurizio Bonora; piumaggio di pernice dei bambù cinese (Bambusicola toracica), foto dell’archivio del Museo Civico di Lentate sul Seveso (Monza).
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Diversity of Ground-Dwelling Arthropods of Pest Management Importance in Commercial Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2007 Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields J. B. Torres Universidade Federal Rural de Pernarnbuco, [email protected] J. R. Ruberson University of Georgia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Torres, J. B. and Ruberson, J. R., "Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields" (2007). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 762. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/762 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746 RESEARCH ARTICLE Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields J.B. Torres1,2 & J.R. Ruberson2 1 Departmento de Agronomia – Entomologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Dois Irma˜ os, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil 2 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA Keywords Abstract Carabidae; Cicindelinae; Falconia gracilis; genetically modified cotton; Labiduridae; The modified population dynamics of pests targeted by the Cry1Ac toxin in predatory heteropterans; Staphylinidae.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synergism Between Dimethyl Trisulfide and Methyl Thiolacetate
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Department of Ecology and Evolutionary EEB Articles Biology 2020 A Synergism Between Dimethyl Trisulfide And Methyl Thiolacetate In Attracting Carrion-Frequenting Beetles Demonstrated By Use Of A Chemically-Supplemented Minimal Trap Stephen T. Trumbo University of Connecticut at Waterbury, [email protected] John Dicapua III University of Connecticut at Waterbury, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/eeb_articles Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Trumbo, Stephen T. and Dicapua, John III, "A Synergism Between Dimethyl Trisulfide And Methyl Thiolacetate In Attracting Carrion-Frequenting Beetles Demonstrated By Use Of A Chemically- Supplemented Minimal Trap" (2020). EEB Articles. 46. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/eeb_articles/46 1 1 2 A Synergism Between Dimethyl Trisulfide And Methyl Thiolacetate In Attracting 3 Carrion-Frequenting Beetles Demonstrated By Use Of A Chemically-Supplemented 4 Minimal Trap 5 6 Stephen T. Trumbo* and John A. Dicapua III 7 8 University of Connecticut, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 9 Waterbury, Connecticut, USA 10 11 *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 99 E. 12 Main St., Waterbury, CT 06710, U.S.A. ([email protected]) 13 ORCID - 0000-0002-4455-4211 14 15 Acknowledgements 16 We thank Alfred Newton (staphylinids), Armin MocZek and Anna Macagno (scarabs) 17 for their assistance with insect identification. Sandra Steiger kindly reviewed the 18 manuscript. The Southern Connecticut Regional Water Authority and the Flanders 19 Preserve granted permission for field experiments. The research was supported by 20 the University of Connecticut Research Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilopoda; Scolopendridae
    Bijdragen tot dl Dierkunde, 55 (1): 125-130 — 1985 Possible species isolation mechanisms in some scolopendrid centipedes (Chilopoda; Scolopendridae) by J.G.E. Lewis Taunton School, Taunton, Somerset TA2 6AD, England the femur of Abstract are seen on Eupolybothrus spp. Various other lithobiid secondary sexual sexual characters in dis- Secondary centipedes are briefly characters have been reviewed by Lewis (1981). cussed and it is that the the suggested spines on prefemora of the described Differences type above are of the last pair of legs in some scolopendrids are used in presumably associated with mating behaviour specific discrimination prior to mating. The hypothesis is in which male and female head discussed with reference of the come together to Scolopendra spp. eastern Mediterranean,north-east Africa and Arabia. to tail, and the antennae and the last pair of legs Where species of Scolopendra with identical The virtually are tapped. morphological adaptations in spinulation on the last legs are sympatric, a large size dif- the males would serve for the femalesto identify ference exists between them. different and sex. It is that in where the species suggested some genera prefemoral have been inhibited. In spines are absent, speciation may the where be absent genus Otostigmus spines may or spine similar in number of other patterns are very a species DIMORPHISM IN SCOLOPENDRIDAE secondary sexual characters have developed. Sexual is also in dimorphism seen the scolopen- INTRODUCTION dromorph family Scolopendridae. In Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus the dorsal side of the Centipedes not infrequently exhibit secondary prefemur, femur and sometimes the tibiaof the last of is sexual characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement of Plastic-Baled Garbage and Regulated (Domestic) Garbage from Hawaii to Landfills in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington
    Movement of Plastic-baled Garbage and Regulated (Domestic) Garbage from Hawaii to Landfills in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Final Biological Assessment, February 2008 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Background on Proposed Action 3 II. Listed Species and Program Assessments 28 Appendix A. Compliance Agreements 85 Appendix B. Marine Mammal Protection Act 150 Appendix C. Risk of Introduction of Pests to the Continental United States via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii. 159 Appendix D. Risk of Introduction of Pests to Washington State via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii 205 Appendix E. Risk of Introduction of Pests to Oregon via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii. 214 Appendix F. Risk of Introduction of Pests to Idaho via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii. 233 2 I. Introduction and Background on Proposed Action This biological assessment (BA) has been prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) to evaluate the potential effects on federally-listed threatened and endangered species and designated critical habitat from the movement of baled garbage and regulated (domestic) garbage (GRG) from the State of Hawaii for disposal at landfills in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Specifically, garbage is defined as urban (commercial and residential) solid waste from municipalities in Hawaii, excluding incinerator ash and collections of agricultural waste and yard waste. Regulated (domestic) garbage refers to articles generated in Hawaii that are restricted from movement to the continental United States under various quarantine regulations established to prevent the spread of plant pests (including insects, disease, and weeds) into areas where the pests are not prevalent.
    [Show full text]