DOCSLIB.ORG

SBC Wireless Selects Infospace Platform to Launch Comprehensive Suite of Next- Generation Wireless Internet Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SBC Wireless Selects Infospace Platform to Launch Comprehensive Suite of Next- Generation Wireless Internet Services SBC Wireless Selects InfoSpace Platform to Launch Comprehensive Suite of Next- Generation Wireless Internet Services Enhanced SBC Wireless Services to Begin Roll-Out by Fourth Quarter 2000 SAN ANTONIO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 26, 2000--SBC Wireless, a leader in global communications, and InfoSpace (Nasdaq: INSP), a leading global provider of information and commerce infrastructure services for wireless devices, merchants and Web sites, today announced that SBC has selected InfoSpace's platform for the national roll-out of its mobile Internet services. SBC Wireless' new mobile Internet services will be widely available to customers in the fourth quarter of this year, and will be available across six SBC Wireless brands: Southwestern Bell Wireless, Ameritech Cellular1, Pacific Bell Wireless, Nevada Bell Wireless, Cellular One2 and SNET. The selection of InfoSpace's wireless Internet platform represents a key component for SBC Wireless in delivering wireless data services to its customers. "Our goal in offering mobile data is to provide the information from the Internet that people want and need when they're mobile," said Stephen Carter, president and CEO of SBC Wireless. "The InfoSpace platform will help us create the 'face' that our customers will see when they use their wireless phones to access information." The wireless data services will provide an added avenue for SBC Wireless subscribers to communicate and access information which will help them manage their busy lives. Specifically, the InfoSpace platform will include services that enable SBC Wireless subscribers: -- to send messages from any device to any capable device using messaging and email; -- to access personal information services such as an address book, calendar and to-do list; and -- to access personalized and/or location-based information that they want, including weather, stock reports and news and sports updates. In addition, SBC Wireless customers will have the ability to access and personalize all of these services through their desktop computers using the same portal and their own password protected Web site. "Our agreement with SBC Wireless is further proof that we have the most compelling platform in the market and that our unique, 'single-click away' services are most conducive to how people will conduct transactions on these devices," said Naveen Jain, chairman and chief strategist of InfoSpace. "SBC Wireless is now able to launch an entire platform for the Wireless Internet under its own brand name and to offer these unique services to their extensive base of subscribers." About SBC Wireless 1. SBC Wireless affiliates provide wireless service under the Ameritech Cellular brand name in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and the Indianapolis area. 2. SBC Wireless affiliates provide wireless service under the Cellular One brand name in parts of Illinois, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, West Virginia, Rhode Island, New Hampshire and Puerto Rico. SBC Communications Inc. (http://www.sbc.com) is a global communications leader. Through its subsidiaries' trusted brands -- Southwestern Bell, Ameritech, Pacific Bell, SBC Telecom, Nevada Bell, SNET and Cellular One -- and world-class network, SBC's subsidiaries provide local and long-distance phone service, wireless and data communications, paging, high-speed Internet access and messaging, cable and satellite television, security services and telecommunications equipment, as well as directory advertising and publishing. In the United States, the company currently has 61.2 million access lines, 12.2 million wireless customers and is undertaking a national expansion program that will bring SBC service to an additional 30 markets. Internationally, SBC has telecommunications investments in more than 20 countries. With approximately 219,000 employees, SBC is the 13th-largest employer in the U.S., with annual revenues that rank it among the largest Fortune 500 companies. About InfoSpace InfoSpace is a worldwide leader in providing infrastructure services for commerce, communication and information to wireless carriers, merchants and Web sites. The Company's affiliates include a network of wireless and other Internet-enabled devices including PCs, cellular phones, pagers, screen telephones, television set-top boxes, online kiosks, and personal digital assistants. These include relationships with SBC Wireless, Vodafone, Intel, Ericsson, Nokia, Mitsui and Acer America. InfoSpace's affiliate network also consists of more than 3,000 Web sites that include AOL, Microsoft, Disney's GO Network, NBC's Snap, Lycos, go2net Inc., DoubleClick, Dow Jones (The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition) and ABC LocalNet, among others. This release contains forward-looking statements relating to the development of the Company's products and services and future operating results, including statements regarding the Company's agreement with SBC Wireless, that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. The words "believe," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Factors that could affect the Company's actual results include the progress and costs of the development of our products and services and the timing of market acceptance of those products and services. A more detailed description of certain factors that could affect actual results include, but are not limited to, those discussed in InfoSpace's Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the section entitled "Factors Affecting InfoSpace's Operating Results, Business Prospects and Market Price of Stock." Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. InfoSpace undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, events or circumstances after the date of this release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Contacts InfoSpace, Inc. Adam Whinston, 425/201-8946 [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BOOK II Bell History and Strategies
    The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 88 BOOK II Bell History and Strategies: Shareholders First, Customers Last What does the Star Wars' Evil Empire and Bell Atlantic Have in Common? James Earl Jones was the Voice of Darth Vadar and is the Voice Of Bell Atlantic— Are There Other Commonalties? The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 89 "Food For Thought" Interlude— Conspiracy or Miscalculation? Book 1 leaves us with a serious dilemma, especially about the I-Way. First, we know straightforwardly that the plans were all scrapped and the announced services were never delivered. But we are left with wondering how both the telephone companies as well as their consultants, were so wrong. Let's look at the options: There were three massive errors in judgment: • Mistakes in the costs of rolling out the network • Mistakes in overestimating demand • Mistakes by the research/consulting suppliers Let's walk through each one: • Mistakes in the Costs of Rolling Out the Network: The original cost model for the I-Way was estimated at around $1,200 per household. However, Bell Atlantic stated that the cost of their trials came to $16,000 per line. This includes the cost of the various Info Highway components in the home, described earlier, as well as the cost of the fiber- optic networks. But, that's a difference per line of 1233%. Of course there are caveats. Most importantly, that the trickle of a rollout was only a "test" of advanced services, and with larger volumes of users, the costs would decline. In fact, Bell Atlantic's original plans may have actually called for a great deal less spending than $1,200 a line.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Medium Has Got Its Game Face on for 2006
    EVERY MEDIUM HAS GOT ITS GAME FACE ON FOR 2006. Even the traditional media that find themselves facing competi- tion on multiple fronts are upbeat about the new year. Whether it’s net- w o r k television—still the big daddy of delivering marke t e r s’ messages to the masses—bullishly forecasting a solid year of growth or the bat- tered radio industry pulling itself up by the bootstraps as it prepares to t a ke on a hot competitor, all major media foresee a year of gains. It’s clear that not everyone will grow, though, thanks to the return of the Internet as a viable media option and the explosion in customized, personalized, portable new-media alternatives (some of which are even being embraced by old media). Individually, these new interactive devices and concepts won’t siphon away a ton of ad dollars (OK, Google and Yahoo! might), but together they could drain significant enough ad dollars from traditional media that some of the old-school- ers (read: print) will find themselves thirsty for more revenue at the end of the year. We’ve entered the era of “me” media, where consumers exert far more control over their content diet than ever before. And all media are trying to embrace that reality in their own ways. Some, particularly the interactive segment, enjoy a clear advantage. But even magazines, by creating digital versions of themselves, and radio, with HD radio, are opening new avenues of media consumption that beckon to the growing millions of control freaks out there.
    [Show full text]
  • \\10.0.10.115\Eti\States\CA\2018-ORA\LLS Testimony\LLS Testimony Sprint T-Mo 01-05-19 NO FOOTER .Wpd
    Before the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of the Joint Application of Sprint Communications Company L.P. (U-5112) and T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, For Approval of Transfer of Application 18-07-011 Control of Sprint Communications Company L.P. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 854(a). And Related Matter. Application 18-07-012 Direct Testimony of LEE L. SELWYN on behalf of the Public Advocates Office at the California Public Utilities Commission January 7, 2019 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LEE L. SELWYN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 Qualifications, background and experience 1 Assignment 6 The public interest and other issues identified in the Scoping Memo 7 ISSUE 1. How would the merger impact competition for services currently provided by Sprint or T-Mobile in any metropolitan area or other geographically distinct market? 8 The mobile wireless telecommunications market in California and throughout the US is already highly concentrated, and further market consolidation is neither warranted nor in the public interest. 8 An analytical framework for assessing the level of market concentration 15 As a general matter, wireless service price levels in the US are decidedly higher than in other western countries where multiple facilities-based carriers are present and where competition appears more intense. 22 ISSUE 3. What are the relevant markets to consider? 27 To properly utilize the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) to assess the level of market concentration, one must firmly establish a proper definition for the relevant product and geographic market.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau February 2003 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information and the types of services sold by 5,364 telecommunications providers. The last report was released November 27, 2001.1 All information in this report is drawn from providers’ April 1, 2002, filing of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A).2 This report can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.3 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. Information from filings received after November 22, 2002, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from the tables. Although many telecommunications providers offer an extensive menu of services, each filer is asked on Line 105 of FCC Form 499-A to select the single category that best describes its telecommunications business.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 9 RECAPITULATION of PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES BY
    Table 9 RECAPITULATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES BY COUNTY Actual and Equalized Property Values for Calendar Year 2003 REAL - PROPERTY PERSONAL - PROPERTY TOTAL-REAL-AND-PERSONAL COUNTY ACTUAL EQUALIZED ACTUAL EQUALIZED ACTUAL EQUALIZED Adams AT&T Communications 674,844 639,752 1,585,989 1,562,199 2,260,833 2,201,951 AT&T Wireless Service of Wa Inc 1,697,548 1,672,084 1,697,548 1,672,084 Avista Corp - Gas 17,012 16,127 4,018,018 3,957,747 4,035,030 3,973,874 Avista Corporation - Electric 1,518,509 1,439,548 18,519,270 18,241,481 20,037,779 19,681,029 Big Bend Elec Coop Inc 971,203 920,700 5,434,236 5,352,719 6,405,439 6,273,419 BNSF - Tax Dept 13,979,631 13,252,691 13,352,510 13,152,222 27,332,141 26,404,913 Cascade Natural Gas Corp 5,600 5,309 1,816,098 1,788,856 1,821,698 1,794,165 Century Tel of WA, Inc (T141) 232,628 220,532 11,343,841 11,173,683 11,576,469 11,394,215 Chevron Pipe Line Co 17,602 16,687 1,609,607 1,585,463 1,627,209 1,602,150 Columbia Basin Railroad Co Inc 1,029,963 1,014,515 1,029,963 1,014,515 Eastern Sub RSA Ltd Partnership 573,300 543,488 2,185,619 2,152,834 2,758,919 2,696,322 Federal Express Corp 2,257 2,223 2,257 2,223 Inland Power & Light Co 296,878 292,423 296,878 292,423 MCI Worldcom Network Services Inc 5,641 5,556 5,641 5,556 Nextel West Corp 176,256 173,612 176,256 173,612 Northwest Pipeline Corp 4,677 4,433 14,925,650 14,701,766 14,930,327 14,706,199 Pacific Bell Wireless Northwest LLC 330,461 325,504 330,461 325,504 Palouse River & Coulee City Railroad 19,788 18,759 5,834 5,746 25,622 24,505 Pioneer
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Merrimac LLC 101 Huntington Avenue 5Th Floor Boston, MA
    101 Merrimac LLC 101Continental Partners LLC 1st Rate Plumbing Heating Llc 101 Huntington Avenue Attn Richard Johnson 71 Littleton Road 5th Floor 3 Hamilton Landing Suite 200 Chelmsford, MA 01824 Boston, MA 02199 Novato, CA 94949 1st Source Parts Center 1st Source Parts Center 21st Century Pool Patio West Inc 101 E Nakoma St PO Box 671589 3736 Vestal Parkway East San Antonio, TX 78216-2737 Dallas, TX 75267-1589 Vestal, NY 13850 2xl Corporation 3 G Media LLC 3 Wire Restaurant Appliance 2415 Braga Dr Gulf Coast Bride Magazine 22322 20th Ave S E Broadview, IL 60155-3941 1400 Commerce Boulevard Suite 25 Bothell, WA 98021 Anniston, AL 36207 3J Happy Floors 3Wire Golden State 4 Contract Design 5099 N W 195 Lane Nw7964 10271 Pua Drive Miami Gardens, FL 33055 Box 1450 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Minneapolis, MN 55485-7964 4Realcrazydeal Com Llc/Koby Dumas 7 Seas Tours Travel A 1 Asphalt Care Inc 125 Arbor Dr 1 210 Franz Dr 50 Wilson Ave San Diego, CA 92103 Freedom, PA 15042 Ivyland, PA 18974 A 1 Event and Party Rentals A 1 Fire A 1 Fire Equipment Corp 251 East Front Street Gary B Goldman PO Box 370926 Covina, CA 91723 c/o Law Offices of Gary B Goldman Miami, FL 33127 17071 W Dixie Hwy N Miami Beach, FL 33160 A 1 Fire Equipment Inc A 1 Ice Equipment Dist Inc A 1 Locksmiths 1002 Central Ave N 1143 Central Avenue 2685 Walnut Hill Lane Kent, WA 98032 Albany, NY 12205 Dallas, TX 75229 A 1 Ocean Breeze Inc A 2 Z Plumbing Services Inc A A C United Fire Safety Eq 26845 Oak Avenue PO Box 147 305 S W 15th Ave Unit 16 Placentia, CA 92871 Pompano Beach, FL
    [Show full text]
  • 2015Infotc40.Pdf
    Anisa A. Latif AT&T Services. Inc. Associate Director 1120 20th Street, N.W., Federal Regulatory Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20036 202.457.3068 Phone 202.457.3071 Fax [email protected] E-mail January 30, 2015 Via Electronic Submission Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW 12th Street Lobby – TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: AT&T Annual Lifeline Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Certification Form – FCC Form 555 WC Docket No. 14-171 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 54.416, AT&T, on behalf of its affiliate AT&T Mobility1, hereby submits its 2015 Annual Lifeline Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Certification Form via the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System. As required, AT&T also submitted its filing to the Universal Service Administrative Company. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, /s/ Anisa A. Latif Anisa A. Latif Attachment 1 SAC Nos. 619004, 259908, 409004, 479006, 269905, 279010, 319026, 289912, 389015, 539010, 639005, 399015, 449022, 529910, and 209012. FCC Form 555 Approved by OMB November 2014 3060-0819 Annual Lifeline Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Certification Form All carriers must complete all or portions of all sections Form must be submitted to USAC and filed with the Federal Communications Commission IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS FIRST Deadline: January 31st (Annually) 399015 Study Area Code (SAC) (An Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) must provide a certification form for each SAC through which it provides Lifeline service). SD Cingular Wireless State ETC Name AT&T Mobility SBC Telecom, SBC Long Distance, BellSouth Mobile Data, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 9 RECAPITULATION of PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES BY
    Table 9 RECAPITULATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES BY COUNTY Actual and Equalized Property Values for Calendar Year 2002 REAL PROPERTY PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTAL REAL & PERSONAL COUNTY ACTUAL EQUALIZED ACTUAL EQUALIZED ACTUAL EQUALIZED Adams AT&T Communications 674,844 622,206 1,333,731 1,333,731 2,008,575 1,955,937 AT&T Wireless Service of Wa Inc 1,563,091 1,563,091 1,563,091 1,563,091 Avista Corp - Gas 17,012 15,685 1,957,074 1,957,074 1,974,086 1,972,759 Avista Corporation - Electric 1,518,509 1,400,065 18,762,528 18,762,528 20,281,037 20,162,593 BNSF - Tax Dept 22,592,355 20,830,151 6,612,293 6,612,293 29,204,648 27,442,444 Big Bend Elec Coop Inc 971,203 895,449 4,831,818 4,831,818 5,803,021 5,727,267 Cascade Natural Gas Corp 87,154 80,356 1,860,758 1,860,758 1,947,912 1,941,114 Century Tel of WA, Inc (T141) 232,628 214,483 11,706,679 11,706,679 11,939,307 11,921,162 Chevron Pipe Line Co 17,602 16,229 594,409 594,409 612,011 610,638 Columbia Basin Railroad Co Inc 849,183 849,183 849,183 849,183 Eastern Sub RSA Ltd Partnership 573,300 528,583 2,558,855 2,558,855 3,132,155 3,087,438 Inland Power & Light Co 296,527 296,527 296,527 296,527 MCI Worldcom Network Services Inc 9,289 9,289 9,289 9,289 Nextel West Corp 177,175 177,175 177,175 177,175 Northwest Pipeline Corp 4,677 4,312 13,799,475 13,799,475 13,804,152 13,803,787 Palouse River & Coulee City Railroad 29,804 27,479 5,208 5,208 35,012 32,687 Pioneer Telephone Co 15,620 15,620 15,620 15,620 Puget Sound Energy/Elec 167,825 167,825 167,825 167,825 Spacenet Inc 1,192 1,192 1,192 1,192
    [Show full text]
  • December 21, 1996
    Wireless Operators US 2000 Consulting Report Executive Summary: This report provides a survey of North American Wireless Network Operators, with a focus on operators in the United States. The U.S. wireless voice and wireless data markets are highly fragmented due to adopted of multiple competing wireless air interface standards and data transmission technnologies. In addition, no one operator has succeeded yet in delivering true coast-to-coast services across all states and territories. Operators have been content to cover major metropolitan centers with their associated high density market population. This has resulted in difficulty roaming nationwide. This report y laysy the foundation for selecting service providers through which to deploy g wig reless medical, educational, entertainment and business applications by providing the critical information required for making the selection. e e t Put rpose: This report provides a survey of North American Wireless Network Operators to determine which are suitable for wireless delivery of medical, a t a t educational and business information and associated application functionality. It r is r one of a family of reports on wireless technology that include: t t r r S Wireless Devices S Wireless Application Protocols o o Wireless Application Service Providers Wireless Application Development Tools Recommendations for Developers of Wireless Applications p p Taken together these reports provide an overview of the set of technologies required to deliver wireless data and application services and products. The final recommendations report provides guidance on the selection of the appropriate e e technologies and makes a limited number of recommendations for specific solutions. Problem: Companies that wish to develop and deploy wireless data services or R R wireless applications face the challenges of delivering useful application functionality and business information through a device appropriate for mobile use over a wireless network that supports the device and associated application protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Service List Dennis Kelley Director of Operations (Provisioning)
    Service List Dennis Kelley Director of Operations (Provisioning) 1-800-Reconex Inc. 2500 Industrial Avenue Hubbard, OR 97032 William E. Braun Vice President and General Counsel 1-800-Reconex Inc. 2500 Industrial Avenue Hubbard, OR 97032 Andrew M. Klein A.R.C. Networks Inc. Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Genevieve Morelli A.R.C. Networks Inc. Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Paola M. Bulloch Director of Regulatory Affairs A.R.C. Networks Inc. 1333 Broadway, Suite 1001 New York, NY 10018 Jill Sandford Senior Attorney AboveNet Communications Inc. 360 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Robert Sokota, Esquire General Counsel AboveNet Communications Inc. 360 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Service List Brian M. Kelleher, Esquire ACC National Telecom Corp. AT&T Corp. 14 Mark Lane New City, NY 10956 Manager - ICA Negotiations Local Service & Access Management ACC National Telecom Corp. AT&T Corp. 32 Avenue of the Americas 5th Floor New York, NY 10013 Regional V.P. - Law & Government Affairs ACC National Telecom Corp. AT&T Corp. 32 Avenue of the Americas 6th Floor New York, NY 10013 Kaye Davis Access Point Inc. 16 Hyland Road Suite D Greenville, SC 29615 Daniel J. Kelley President, COO AccessBridge Communications, Inc. 1 Federal Street, Bldg 102-3 Springfield, MA 01105 Douglas R. Norton President AccessPlus Communications Inc. 7 Knobb Hill Byfield, MA 01922 David Stevanovski ACN Communications Services Inc. 32991 Hamilton Court Farmington Hills, MI 48334 Service List Teny J. Romine Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs Adelphia Business Solutions Operations Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Board of Trustees Meeting
    MM II SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES NN REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 4, 2003 Santa Monica College UU 1900 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica, California 5:30 p.m. – Closed Session TT Business Building Room 111 7:00 p.m. - Public Meeting Board Room EE Business Building Room 117 The complete minutes may be accessed on the Santa Monica College website: SS http://www.smc.edu/admin/trustees/meetings/ \ BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING August 4, 2003 SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MINUTES A meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Santa Monica Community College District is scheduled be held in the Santa Monica College Board Room (Business Building Room 117), 1900 Pico Boulevard, Santa Monica, California, on Monday, August 4, 2003. The agenda included the following items: (Items for action - recommendations - are listed numerically; items for information are listed alphabetically). I. ORGANIZATIONAL FUNCTIONS A Call to Order B Roll Call II. CLOSED SESSION III. PUBLIC SESSION - ORGANIZATIONAL FUNCTIONS (Continued) C Pledge of Allegiance #1 Approval of Minutes: July 7, 2003 (Regular meeting) July 26, 2003 (Retreat) IV. MAJOR ITEMS OF BUSINESS #2 Public Hearing: Madison Theater Project #3 A Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Santa Monica Community College District Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report on the Santa Monica College Madison Theater Project #4 A Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Santa Monica Community College District Making CEQA Findings Necessary to Approve Development of the Santa Monica College Madison Theater Project, Adopting Statement of Overriding Considerations, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Plan, and Approving Madison Theater Project V.
    [Show full text]