DOCSLIB.ORG

Authorisation and Decision-Making in Native Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Authorisation and Decision-Making in Native Title Authorisation and decision-making in native title Nick Duff Goldfields Land and Sea Council Authorisation and decision-making in native title Authorisation and decision-making in native title Nick Duff Goldfields Land and Sea Council First published in 2017 by AIATSIS Research Publications © Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 2017. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act), no part of this article may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Act also allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this publication, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied or distributed digitally by any educational institution for its educational purposes, provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) GPO Box 553, Canberra ACT 2601 Phone: (61 2) 6246 1111 Fax: (61 2) 6261 4285 Email: [email protected] Web: www.aiatsis.gov.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Duff, Nick, author. Title: Authorisation and decision-making in native title / Nick Duff. ISBN: 9781922102614 (paperback) 9781922102607 (ebook) Subjects: Native title (Australia) Land tenure--Law and legislation--Australia. Aboriginal Australians--Land tenure. Culture and law--Australia. Australian Other Creators/Contributors: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Typeset in Garamond Contents Summary ix Abbreviations xi Acknowledgments xii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 What this book is about 4 1.2 What is authorisation? 4 Authorisation in the claims process 5 Authorisation in the agreement-making process 6 Authorisation after the determination 6 Authorisation for compensation applications 6 2. Authorisation in native title determination applications 7 2.1 What is an applicant? 7 Applicants are joint but not incorporated 8 Eligibility to be named applicant 13 Summary: What is an applicant? 16 2.2 When and why is it necessary to establish authorisation? 17 Originating application — Form 1 17 Registration test 17 Jurisdiction 19 Strike-out, dismissal and ‘show cause’ orders 21 Joinder 24 Replacing the existing applicant 25 Taking steps in the proceedings 25 2.3 Legal, political and social importance of the applicant 26 3. Authorising an applicant 29 3.1 The ‘native title claim group’: conceptualising the authorising constituency 29 Subgroups and shared country 35 ‘Trust-like’ claims 40 Social or cultural coherence not required 42 Representative structures in the authorisation process 44 Summary: native title claim group 46 Published by AIATSIS Research Publications v 3.2 Authorisation by ‘all the persons’ in the native title claim group 46 What proportion of claim group members must be involved in authorisation? 47 Will opposition by a minority prevent authorisation? 52 Must an authorisation meeting be representative of all subgroups? 55 May (or must) the application be authorised separately by the various constituent subgroups? 57 Applicant need not reflect internal subgroup structure 59 Will the participation of non–claim group members at a meeting void the authorisation given? 60 Is a meeting actually required at all? 61 3.3 Authorisation in practice 66 Before the meeting — research and notification 66 Pre-meeting research 67 Circulation of notices 67 Content of notices 69 Other matters 72 Attempts to prevent meetings 73 At the meeting — decision-making processes 74 Mutually exclusive hierarchy of processes in s. 251B 75 Traditional decision-making process 76 Non-traditional decision-making process 83 Proving the process and outcomes 87 Quality versus form in the decision-making process 89 4. Actions by the applicant 95 4.1 Extent of applicant autonomy 95 Amendments and errors 97 Interlocutory steps, discontinuance, consent determination 99 Conditional appointment 101 Disagreement between applicant and some members of the claim group 105 4.2 Disagreement, disability or death within the applicant 107 Can an applicant act by majority if the terms of appointment say so? 107 Can an applicant act by majority without an explicit provision? 109 What are the consequences of disagreement within the applicant? 111 Separate legal representation 113 4.3 Obligations of the applicant 113 4.4 Legal professional obligations 116 vi Published by AIATSIS Research Publications 5. Changing the composition of the applicant 119 5.1 How can the composition of the applicant be changed? 121 Non-66B method 123 Change to composition of the proposed replacement applicant between authorisation and application 125 Section 66B method 126 Authorisation of the replacement applicant 127 Grounds for removal or replacement 129 Discretion 136 Documents required 138 5.2 Consequences of a failed s. 66B application 139 6. Changing the claim group description 141 6.1 Authorisation by pre-amendment group 141 Participation in decision-making by non-members of pre-amendment claim group 144 6.2 Authorisation by proposed amended claim group 145 Where amended claim group authorises replacement applicant 147 Where outgoing applicant refuses to make the application for amendment 150 Replacement applicant composed entirely of pre-amendment claim group members 153 Replacement applicant contains some individuals not part of pre-amendment claim group 154 Where original authorisation was defective 156 6.3 Summary on changing claim group description 158 7. Authorisation and decision-making in agreement-making 161 7.1 Entering and authorising ILUAs 162 Area ILUA 163 Who must be party to an Area ILUA? 164 Who must authorise an Area ILUA? 171 Process for authorisation 180 Separate decisions 184 Combined decision 184 When an RNTBC is involved 186 Documentation 187 Objections and registration 188 Alternative Procedure ILUA 191 Body Corporate ILUA 192 Published by AIATSIS Research Publications vii 7.2 Entering and authorising s. 31 agreements 193 The legal mechanics of s. 31 agreements 193 The role and autonomy of the applicant in s. 31 agreements 194 Where some of the named applicants disagree or are unavailable 196 Privity under s. 31 agreements 201 8. Post-determination decision-making and nominating the RNTBC 203 8.1 Nominating a PBC for determination 205 Who can nominate? 206 Is evidence of authorisation or consent required? 207 Process for nominating an existing RNTBC for a further determination 210 Process for replacing the RNTBC 210 Replacement initiated by common law native title holders 210 Replacement initiated by liquidator 212 Criteria for replacement corporations 212 8.2 Decision-making within RNTBCs 213 Consultation and consent requirements for native title decisions 216 Native title decision 217 Regulation 8 procedure 219 Alternative consultation process (Regulation 8A) 221 Documenting the process 222 Summary 225 9. Native title compensation claims 227 9.1 Claim filed by RNTBC 227 9.2 Claim filed by individual named applicants 228 10. Conclusion 231 10.1 The scope of authority 232 10.2 Logical circles 233 10.3 Loss of procedural self-reliance? 236 10.4 Navigating in difficult territory 238 viii Published by AIATSIS Research Publications Summary Native title involves an interface between the Australian legal system and Indigenous legal, cultural and political systems. In Australia, traditional Indigenous rights in land are necessarily recognised and managed at the group level, even in contexts where some rights can be held individually. At the same time, the Australian legal system generally demands hard-edged decisions, with legal consequences that are concrete, final and binding rather than fluid, contextual and renegotiable. In this setting, native title law must regulate complex and contested interactions between the Australian legal system and sometimes large and disparate groups of Indigenous people. In doing so, the law faces a twin challenge: how to remain neutral in the face of competing claims about legitimate Indigenous authority, while ensuring that internal disagreements do not make collective agency impossible. The Australian legal system addresses this challenge by imposing a centralised representative structure on Indigenous group decision-making. During the native title claims process and compensation claims, this is done by requiring groups to appoint one or more individuals to act as the ‘applicant’ in the Federal Court. After native title is formally recognised, a new representative structure is mandated – the ‘registered native title body corporate’. In both cases, the law sets out rules that both govern the process by which the group authorises the representative and define the scope of the representative’s power to make decisions on behalf of the group without prior consultation. Together, these rules can broadly be referred to as the ‘law on authorisation’. In the more than 20 years since the first native title claim, a vast and complex body of law and practice has developed, covering everything from the legal duties owed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Native Title Information Talk Delivered at Fernvale Futures on 22 February 2014. Tim Wishart Slide 1 I Acknowledge and Offer M
    A Native Title Information Talk Delivered at Fernvale Futures on 22 February 2014. Tim Wishart Slide 1 I acknowledge and offer my respect to the country on which we meet and to the Traditional Owners of this country and to their Old People and Elders. The organisation for which I work, Queensland South Native Title Services is a native title service provider recognised and funded by the Federal Government under the Native Title Act (1993). Slide 2 The area for which QSNTS has statutory recognition under the Native Title Act covers an area spanning Queensland, along the New South Wales border from the Coral Sea to the South Australian border, north to about 250 kilometres north of Mt Isa and running diagonally south eastwards to the coast, marginally south of Sarina. Slide 3 I ought to say that views and opinions expressed are mine and are not necessarily reflective of corporate views or policy of QSNTS. In this conversation I will refer to the Native Title Act as ‘the Act’. But in the consciousness of Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander society, the expression “the Act” is often a reference to The Aboriginal Protection and Restrictions of the Sale of Opium Act 1897. That legislation was an Act of the Queensland Parliament. As a result of dispersal, malnutrition, use of opium and diseases, all a consequence of European incursion into traditional lands coupled with the attempted genocide that came with that incursion, it was widely believed in Queensland that Aborigines were members of a 'dying race'. In 1894 pressure from some quarters of the community saw the Queensland Government commission Archibald Meston to look at what had conveniently, for the colonising power, become the plight of Aboriginal people.
    [Show full text]
  • Into Its Component Parts to Determine the Im- Pacts of Extinguishment
    hensive right would need to be ‘unbundled’ holders to make decisions in relation to access into its component parts to determine the im- and use of their country. pacts of extinguishment [382]. The result of the extinguishing impacts of The applicants had suggested that with this pastoral leases in the area means that the underlying recognition of exclusive possession rights in relation to large tracts of country are the most appropriate way to determine the limited to general access, hunting and fishing impact of extinguishment was by what I rights for personal communal or ceremonial would describe as an ‘exclusive possession – and non-commercial use. Because the surviv- minus’ methodology. That is, the exclusive ing rights are so limited on this approach, the possession title is reduced by the extent of the judge took the advice of the High Court in interests granted. The Court would assess the Ward and resorted to considering the kinds of rights and interests conferred by the non- activities that could be exercised in pursuit of indigenous interest and the native title would the native title. These activities, it was said, be extinguished only to the extent necessary do not define the legal content of the right to give effect to the right. The exercise of the but, nevertheless now express the relationship laws and customs relied upon by the native between native title and the other interests in title holders in establishing their claim would the area. be exercisable subject to the rights of the in- terest holder. The judge rejected the notion Such invasive extinguishment is not necessary of what he called ‘conditional rights’ based on in order to give effect to the limited rights en- decisions of the High Court in Ward and Yar- compassed by many of these interests, and mirr [475].
    [Show full text]
  • Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict Over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski
    Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski To cite this version: Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski. Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape. E-rea - Revue électronique d’études sur le monde an- glophone, Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone, 2017, 10.4000/erea.5821. hal-01567433 HAL Id: hal-01567433 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01567433 Submitted on 23 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. E-rea Revue électronique d’études sur le monde anglophone 14.2 | 2017 1. Pastoral Sounds / 2. Histories of Space, Spaces of History Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew GRAVES and Elizabeth RECHNIEWSKI Publisher Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone Electronic version URL: http://erea.revues.org/5821 DOI: 10.4000/erea.5821 Brought to you by Aix-Marseille Université ISBN: ISSN 1638-1718 ISSN: 1638-1718 Electronic reference Matthew GRAVES and Elizabeth RECHNIEWSKI, « Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape », E-rea [Online], 14.2 | 2017, Online since 15 June 2017, connection on 23 July 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Miller, Jessica
    Jessica Miller, M NRM 19 March 2018 Independent Scientific Panel Inquiry Locked Bag 33 Cloisters Square PERTH WA 6850 Submission to the WA Fracking Inquiry To whom it may concern, I am writing in response to the Independent Scientific Panel’s call for public submissions as part of the Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia 2017 (Fracking Inquiry). My expertise is in natural resource management, cultural resource management, ecology, and strategic environmental impact assessment and regulation (including working in the Australian Government on coal seam gas mining monitoring and audit). I am currently undertaking a Master of Philosophy research degree with The University of Queensland, focusing on the ecological impacts of forest roads for coal seam gas development on bird communities. As part of this research I am also reviewing the extent to which enigmatic impacts (e.g. cryptic, cumulative and indirect and secondary impacts) are accounted for in the Environmental Impact Statements of Australian coal seam gas developments. In addition, I currently work as an ecologist and environmental-cultural management expert for Environs Kimberley, based in Broome WA. Below I address a number of points within the Fracking Inquiry Terms of Reference, namely: the potential ecological impacts of fracking in WA; impacts on human health and wellbeing; and the extent to which such industries can be adequately regulated by governments. These points are made based on my own expertise as well as peer reviewed literature and government reports. As I do not have the resources to undertake a thorough literature review of all matters discussed here, I have included a range of resources I think should also be considered as part of my submission, and represent an introduction to the matters raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Prevention for LGBTIQ+ Communities Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial
    Science. Compassion. Action. Suicide prevention for LGBTIQ+ communities Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial April 2021 Suicide prevention for LGBTIQ+ communities: Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial ii Acknowledgements Black Dog Institute Black Dog Institute would like to acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as Australia’s First People and Traditional Custodians. We value their cultures, identities, and continuing connection to country, waters, kin and community. We pay our respects to Elders past and present and are committed to making a positive contribution to the mental health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across Australia. Brisbane North PHN We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Turrbal and Jagera People of Brisbane, the Gubbi Gubbi people of Caboolture and Bribie Island, the Waka Waka people of Kilcoy and the Ningy Ningy people of Redcliffe. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging for they hold the memories, the traditions, the culture and the hopes of Aboriginal Australia. North Western Melbourne PHN We would like to acknowledge the Wurundjeri People, the Boonerwrung People and the Wathaurong People as the traditional custodians of the land on which our work takes place. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging. Acknowledgement of lived experience We acknowledge those contributing to suicide prevention efforts who are survivors of a suicide attempt, have experienced suicidal behaviour, or have been bereaved or impacted by suicide. Your insights and contributions are critical. Thank you The Black Dog Institute thanks the interviewees and other stakeholders from the Brisbane North Primary Health Network (PHN), North Western Melbourne PHN and the LGBTIQ+ Health Australia for their contributions to the development of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Path to Treaty
    Report from the Treaty Working Group on Queensland’s PATH TO TREATY February 2020 Copyright Copyright © State of Queensland, February 2020. Copyright protects this publication. Excerpts may be reproduced with acknowledgment of the State of Queensland. This document is licensed by the State of Queensland under a Creative Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 Australian license. CC BY License Summary Statement: In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Report from the Treaty Working Group on Queensland’s Path to Treaty as long as you attribute the work to the State of Queensland. To view a copy of this license, visit: www. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. The information in this publication is general and does not take into account individual circumstances or situations. Disclaimer Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples are warned the photographs in this publication may contain images of deceased persons which may cause sadness or distress. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................4 Introduction and history 4 Treaties and agreement making 4 Community engagement process and findings 4 Conclusions 5 Recommendations 5 MESSAGE FROM THE TREATY WORKING GROUP ..................................................8 MEET THE TREATY WORKING GROUP AND EMINENT PANEL ..................................8 GLOSSARY AND TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................ 13 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 14 1. A BRIEF HISTORY OF QUEENSLAND ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Test Decision
    Registration test decision Application name Yugara/YUgarapul People Name of applicant Mr. Desmond Sandy, Mrs. Ruth James, Ms. Pearl Sandy State/territory/region Queensland NNTT file no. QC11/8 Federal Court of Australia file no. QUD586/2011 Date application made 7 December 2011 Date application last amended 16 February 2012 Name of delegate Stephen Rivers-McCombs I have considered this claim for registration against each of the conditions contained in ss. 190B and 190C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth). For the reasons attached, I do not accept this claim for registration pursuant to s. 190A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth). For the purposes of s. 190D(3), my opinion is that the claim does not satisfy all of the conditions in s. 190B. Date of decision: 10 May 2012 ___________________________________ Stephen Rivers-McCombs Delegate of the Native Title Registrar pursuant to sections 190, 190A, 190B, 190C, 190D of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) under an instrument of delegation dated 24 August 2011 and made pursuant to s. 99 of the Act. Facilitating timely and effective outcomes Reasons for decision Table of contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Application overview............................................................................................................... 4 Registration test .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Urban and Peri-Urban Indigenous People's Adaptive
    Low Choy, Darryl, Clarke, Philip, Serrao-Neumann, Silvia, Hales, Robert, Koshade, Olivia and Jones, David 2016, Coastal urban and peri-urban Indigenous people’s adaptive capacity to climate change. In Maheshwari, Basant, Singh, Vijay P. and Thoradeniya, Bhadranie (eds), Balanced urban development: options and strategies for liveable cities, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp.441-461. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_27 This is the published version. ©2016, The Authors Reproduced by Deakin University under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence Available from Deakin Research Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30090806 Chapter 27 Coastal Urban and Peri-Urban Indigenous People’s Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Darryl Low Choy , Philip Clarke , Silvia Serrao-Neumann , Robert Hales , Olivia Koschade , and David Jones Abstract This chapter discusses the adaptive capacity of coastal urban and peri- urban Indigenous People’s to climate change. It is based on the fi ndings of a National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF) funded project that uti- lised a series of case studies that engaged key representatives from Indigenous organisations in fi ve coastal locations in three states of south-eastern Australia (Low Choy D, Clarke P, Jones D, Serrao-Neumann S, Hales R, Koschade O et al., Aboriginal reconnections: understanding coastal urban and peri-urban Indigenous people’s vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, 139 pp, 2013). The study has highlighted the social, economic and environmental impacts on urban and peri- urban Indigenous communities inhabiting coastal areas throughout south-eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022
    DRAFT V20 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022 Working to recover, rebuild and reconnect more resilient Queensland communities following the 2019 Queensland Bushfires August 2020 to come Document details Interpreter Security classification Public The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have Date of review of security classification August 2020 difficulty in understanding this report, you can access the Translating and Interpreting Authority Queensland Reconstruction Authority Services via www.qld.gov.au/languages or by phoning 13 14 50. Document status Final Disclaimer Version 1.0 While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no QRA reference QRATF/20/4207 responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. ISSN 978-0-9873118-4-9 To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Copyright Copies This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968. © The State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority), August 2020. Copies of this publication are available on our website at: https://www.qra.qld.gov.au/fitzroy Further copies are available upon request to: Licence Queensland Reconstruction Authority This work is licensed by State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority) under a Creative PO Box 15428 Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International licence. City East QLD 4002 To view a copy of this licence, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Phone (07) 3008 7200 In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute [email protected] the work to the State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority).
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation Action Plan (July 2019 - December 2020) Acknowledgement of Country
    Reconciliation Action Plan (July 2019 - December 2020) Acknowledgement of Country Cooper Grace Ward acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land on which we operate and conduct our business across Queensland and Australia. We pay our respects to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and to elders, past, present and emerging. About the artwork Brooke Sutton is a contemporary Indigenous artist from the Kalkadoon people from the Mount Isa area in Queensland. ‘Walumarra business’ is the name of this painting which translates into ‘women’s business’ in the Kalkadoon language. The Kalkadoon people have a connection to the sea as they used to travel north to the gulf country to hunt and gather food. Brooke’s painting depicts the many vibrant colours and life given by the sea to all living sea creatures. Gallery catalogue number – WALGTLDW71 Artist – Brooke Sutton, 14 years old Medium – acrylic and textured acrylic on canvas Artist language group – Kalkatungu (Kalkadoon) Artist language group – Emu Foot Province, Mount Isa Queensland Year painted – 2019 Size – 60cm wide x 90cm high www.cherneesutton.com.au Statement from our Managing Partner At Cooper Grace Ward we want to build better lives for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals and corporations. An initiative of Reconciliation Australia, the Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) program provides a framework for organisations to support the national reconciliation movement. The RAP program contributes to reconciliation by supporting organisations to develop respectful relationships and create meaningful opportunities with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We see the RAP as a way for our firm to advance reconciliation within our own sphere of influence, being legal services in Queensland and across Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Young Queensland Will Then Become the Queen of Lands'
    ‘Young Queensland The Old Government House site before Queensland was established will then become the For thousands of years the river and surrounding land has been the traditional country of the Turrbal Queen of Lands’ and Jagera people. Moreton Bay Courier, 13 December 1859 In 1825 the Moreton Bay penal settlement was established on the northern bank of the river. After fourteen years the convict settlement closed Separation achieved and in 1842 Brisbane was officially opened to all ‘A great event in our history’ settlers. Throughout the 1850s, the Moreton Bay District of New South Wales had fought an often bitter campaign to become a separate, northern colony. QUEEN’S INSTRUCTIONS In early July 1859, ‘the glorious news’ arrived in On 6 June 1859 Queen Brisbane that separation had finally been won. The Victoria signed Letters new colony was to be called Queen’s Land – a name Patent, the document that Queen Victoria had coined herself – and Sir George created Queensland, and Bowen was appointed the colony’s first governor sent Sir George Bowen instructions (below). Months later on 10 December 1859 Governor Bowen Image courtesy of The Royal finally arrived in Brisbane and Queensland was Collection © 2008 Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. officially proclaimed a separate self-governing colony. Document image courtesy of Queensland was the only Australian colony to start Government House, Brisbane. with its own parliament without first being a British controlled Crown Colony. An estimated 4000 jubilant people lined Brisbane’s streets to welcome Sir George and Lady Bowen as they made their way from the Botanic Gardens landing to the temporary Government House.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Cultural Heritage
    12. Cultural Heritage Northern Link Phase 2 – Detailed Feasibility Study CHAPTER 12 CULTURAL HERITAGE September 2008 Contents 12. Cultural Heritage 12-1 12.1 Description of the Existing Environment 12-1 12.1.1 Cultural Heritage Significance 12-1 12.1.2 Commonwealth Legislation 12-2 12.1.3 State Legislation 12-2 12.1.4 Local Legislation 12-2 12.1.5 Approach 12-3 12.1.6 Aboriginal Heritage 12-3 12.1.7 Non Indigenous Heritage 12-8 12.2 Impact Assessment 12-17 12.2.1 Western Freeway Connection 12-18 12.2.2 Toowong Connection 12-18 12.2.3 Driven Tunnels 12-19 12.2.4 Kelvin Grove Connection 12-25 12.2.5 Inner City Bypass Connection 12-27 12.2.6 Proposed Ventilation Outlet Sites 12-27 PAGE i 12. Cultural Heritage This chapter addresses Part B, Section 5.8, of the Terms of Reference (ToR), which require the EIS to describe existing values for indigenous and non-indigenous cultural heritage areas and objects that may be affected by Northern Link activities. The ToR also require that the EIS prepare cultural heritage surveys as relevant, to determine the significance of any cultural heritage areas or items and assist with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Management Plans to protect any areas or items of significance. The ToR also require that the EIS provide a description of any likely impacts on cultural heritage values, and to recommend means of mitigating any negative impacts. 12.1 Description of the Existing Environment Cultural heritage focuses on aspects of the past which people value and which are important in identifying who we are.
    [Show full text]