Phd Thesis SIMION 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phd Thesis SIMION 2014 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L'UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE – PARIS VI École Doctorale 515 « Complexité du Vivant » Présentée pour obtenir le grade de Docteur de l'Université Pierre et Marie Curie par Paul SIMION Les cténophores : de leur position dans l'arbre des métazoaires (approche phylogénomique) à leur diversité taxonomique (phylogénie moléculaire et anatomie comparée) Soutenance prévue le 27 novembre 2014 Devant le jury composé de : Maximilian TELFORD, Professeur, University College London Rapporteur Didier CASANE, Professeur, Université Paris VII Rapporteur Evelyn HOULISTON, Directrice de Recherche CNRS Nicole BOURY-ESNAULT, Directrice de Recherche CNRS honoraire Frédéric DELSUC, Chargé de recherche CNRS Michaël MANUEL, Professeur, Université Paris VI Directeur de thèse Résumé Les cténophores représentent l’un des quatre embranchements animaux extérieurs aux Bilateria. La majorité des espèces sont planctoniques et gélatineuses, et sont reconnaissables à leurs huit rangées de peignes dont le battement permet la nage. Leur systématique est encore de nos jours mal comprise. L'anatomie des cténophores offre peu de caractères aussi bien pour placer la lignée dans l’arbre des métazoaires, que pour établir les relations de parenté au sein de l’embranchement et délimiter les espèces, et jusqu’à présent les données moléculaires n’ont pas permis de résoudre ces problèmes de manière satisfaisante. L’objectif de ce travail de thèse est de contribuer à améliorer notre compréhension de l'évolution des cténophores à différentes échelles taxonomiques. A l’échelle des métazoaires, la position phylogénétique des cténophores a été abordée par une approche phylogénomique. Un effort significatif a été réalisé pour améliorer l’échantillonnage taxonomique à travers le séquençage et l’assemblage des transcriptomes de 22 espèces de non-Bilateria (cténophores, cnidaires, spongiaires). Deux jeux de données indépendants ont été analysés, le premier représentant une mise à jour d’une supermatrice existante de 128 gènes ; le second (4235 gènes) ayant été entièrement construit de novo via un protocole original comportant la mise au point de nouvelles méthodes pour traiter de manière semi-automatisée les principales sources potentielles d’artéfact (contaminations, paralogies, données manquantes). Les résultats contredisent certaines études récentes en montrant que les spongiaires et non les cténophores représentent le groupe-frère des autres métazoaires. La position exacte de ces derniers reste à ce stade incertaine (trois options se présentant suivant les analyses). A l’échelle intra-phylétique, l'analyse d'un jeu de données comprenant les marqueurs ADNr 18S et Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS), associée à des analyses de gènes dupliqués chez les cténophores et aux analyses phylogénomiques précédentes, a permis de résoudre une grande partie des relations phylogénétiques entre les ordres et les familles de cténophores, tout en permettant de préciser la position de la racine. Enfin, à une échelle taxonomique plus fine, une comparaison approfondie entre deux espèces du genre Pleurobrachia au moyen de marquages immunohistochimiques montre le potentiel de ces techniques comme source de nouveaux caractères structuraux « micro-anatomiques » à valeur diagnostique pour la délimitation et l’identification des espèces de cténophores. En conclusion, ce travail se veut une contribution au progrès de la systématique d’un embranchement encore méconnu et d’une grande importance pour la compréhension des évènements anciens de l’évolution animale. Abstract Ctenophores are one of the four animal phyla positioned outside from the Bilateria. Most ctenophore species are planktonic and gelatinous, and are easily recognisable by their eight comb rows used for swimming. Ctenophore systematics remains nowadays poorly understood. Anatomical characters do not help much in placing them within the animal tree, and similarly the grounds for establishment of their internal phylogeny as well as delimitation of species are notoriously weak due to a paucity of informative morpho-anatomical characters. Until now, the use of molecular data has failed to improve significantly this situation. The aim of this PhD thesis was to bring a contribution to our understanding of ctenophore evolution at different taxonomic scales. At the metazoan level, the position of ctenophores was addressed using a phylogenomic approach. Taxonomic sampling was significantly improved through sequencing and assembly of transcriptomes of 22 non-bilaterian species (belonging to ctenophores, cnidarians and sponges). Two independent datasets were analysed, one consisting in an update of an existing supermatrix of 128 genes, the other one (4235 genes) having been entirely built de novo, thanks to a newly-devised semi-automated protocol intended to eliminate all major potential causes of artefacts (contaminations, paralogies, missing data). Results clearly contradict recent phylogenomic studies which claimed Ctenophora to be the most early-diverging animal lineage, our analyses instead supporting Porifera as the sister-group to other metazoans. The exact position of ctenophores remains however uncertain at this stage, different conditions of analyses yielding three contradictory hypotheses as open possibilities. At the intra-phyletic level, analyses of a ADNr 18S and ITS (internal transcribed spacers) dataset, together with study of duplicated genes and the results of phylogenomic analyses, allowed resolving most phylogenetic relationships between ctenophore orders and families, including the placement of the ctenophore tree root. Finally, at smaller taxonomic scale, in-depth comparison between two species of the genus Pleurobrachia using immunohistochemistry demonstrates the potential of these techniques for uncovering new structural “micro-anatomical” characters useful for diagnosis and identification of ctenophore species. It is our hope that this work will contribute to improving the systematics of a poorly known phylum of great importance for understanding early animal evolution. Remerciements Mes plus profonds remerciements vont, évidemment, à Michaël, qui m©a inconditionnellement prêté sa confiance du début à la fin de cette thèse. Au-delà de ses (exceptionnelles) compétences scientifiques, je tiens à souligner ici ce qui est important : son admirable empathie. Attentif et présent, il a su détecter l©encadrement nécessaire à ma rigueur et la liberté nécessaire à mon humeur. C©était parfait. Mes remerciements les plus profonds (du coup, grosso modo à égalité avec Michaël¼) vont à Muriel, dont la bienveillance, l©énergie et la disponibilité forcent l©humilité. Elle m©a aidé aux moindres besoins, et il est difficile d©imaginer la montagne de difficultés que je n©ai jamais eu à affronter grâce à elle. Mais je la remercie surtout parce qu©elle géniale. Muriel, si vous la diluez dans l©eau, ça en fait dix normales. Je tiens à tout particulièrement remercier Hervé, d©abord pour son accompagnement tout au long de ces trois ans, ses conseils précieux et les biscuits bretons, mais également parce qu©en tant que responsable de l©école doctorale qui m©a accordé une bourse de thèse et président de mon comité de suivi, il a permis l©existence de ces recherches. Il pourra trouver dans ce manuscrit tous les arbres que j©ai trop tardé à lui montrer, je les lui doit bien ! Je remercie également, et chaleureusement, Éric pour son accompagnement durant cette thèse, ses discussions éclairées, ses questionnements stimulants, sa critique salutaire, et notre haine commune des imprimantes. Les conversations avec lui sont aussi intéressantes et variées que la Clairette de Die qu©il ramène est bonne. Je veux transmettre à Alicia, Karen, Joao et Thomas, tous mes remerciements du fond du cúur, à la fois pour les foultitudes de coups de mains dont ils m©ont fait l©honneur, mais surtout pour m©avoir continuellement accompagné dans la joie et la tendresse. Je tiens à leur dire tout le bonheur qu©ils m©apportent tous les jours depuis bientôt trois ans. Tous les jours, sans exception. Je remercie chaleureusement tous les membres du laboratoire, et du A4 en général, avec des mentions spéciales pour les membres de l©équipe AIRE, dont l©aide m©a été précieuse, et à Dominique, Philippe et Danielle pour leur soutien administratif. Je remercie également Muriel Umbhauer et Elisabeth Clément de l©école doctorale 515 pour leur aide, et enfin je remercie bien sûr Gaëlle Boutin dont la sympathie et la compétence surpassent mes défauts administratifs, c©est dire. Merci à Hervé Philippe et à Gert Wörheide, qui m©ont donné l©occasion de travailler avec eux, de profiter de leurs savoirs et de leur expérience. Merci de m©avoir accueilli dans vos laboratoires, ces voyages ont été pour moi extrêmement enrichissants. Merci également à Tetyana Nosenko bien sûr, ma toute première professeur de bio-informatique. Je remercie également Alexander Ereskovsky et Frédéric Delsuc pour leur accompagnement durant ma thèse, leur participation à mon comité de suivi et les différents services qu©ils n©ont jamais hésité à me rendre. Un grand merci à Evelyn Houliston et Olivier Gros pour leur accueil dans leurs laboratoires respectifs, et bien entendu merci aussi à Pascal, Carine, Tsuyoshi et Antonella. Je remercie également les pêcheurs de la station biologique de Villefranche-sur-Mer pour les petits tours en bâteau, et les membres de l©association de plongée Eden à Port-Louis pour les magnifiques ballades sous-marines. Je tiens à remercier aussi les « anciens jeunes », Cyrielle,
Recommended publications
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of the Sponge Fauna from Walters Shoal, a Shallow Seamount in the Western Indian Ocean Region
    Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region By Robyn Pauline Payne A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Supervisors: Dr Toufiek Samaai Prof. Mark J. Gibbons Dr Wayne K. Florence The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. December 2015 Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region Robyn Pauline Payne Keywords Indian Ocean Seamount Walters Shoal Sponges Taxonomy Systematics Diversity Biogeography ii Abstract Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region R. P. Payne MSc Thesis, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Seamounts are poorly understood ubiquitous undersea features, with less than 4% sampled for scientific purposes globally. Consequently, the fauna associated with seamounts in the Indian Ocean remains largely unknown, with less than 300 species recorded. One such feature within this region is Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount located on the South Madagascar Ridge, which is situated approximately 400 nautical miles south of Madagascar and 600 nautical miles east of South Africa. Even though it penetrates the euphotic zone (summit is 15 m below the sea surface) and is protected by the Southern Indian Ocean Deep- Sea Fishers Association, there is a paucity of biodiversity and oceanographic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials: Patterns of Sponge Biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia
    Diversity 2016, 8, 21; doi:10.3390/d8040021 S1 of S3 9 Supplementary Materials: Patterns of Sponge Biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia Jane Fromont, Muhammad Azmi Abdul Wahab, Oliver Gomez, Merrick Ekins, Monique Grol and John Norman Ashby Hooper 1. Materials and Methods 1.1. Collation of Sponge Occurrence Data Data of sponge occurrences were collated from databases of the Western Australian Museum (WAM) and Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) [1]. Pilbara sponge data on ALA had been captured in a northern Australian sponge report [2], but with the WAM data, provides a far more comprehensive dataset, in both geographic and taxonomic composition of sponges. Quality control procedures were undertaken to remove obvious duplicate records and those with insufficient or ambiguous species data. Due to differing naming conventions of OTUs by institutions contributing to the two databases and the lack of resources for physical comparison of all OTU specimens, a maximum error of ± 13.5% total species counts was determined for the dataset, to account for potentially unique (differently named OTUs are unique) or overlapping OTUs (differently named OTUs are the same) (157 potential instances identified out of 1164 total OTUs). The amalgamation of these two databases produced a complete occurrence dataset (presence/absence) of all currently described sponge species and OTUs from the region (see Table S1). The dataset follows the new taxonomic classification proposed by [3] and implemented by [4]. The latter source was used to confirm present validities and taxon authorities for known species names. The dataset consists of records identified as (1) described (Linnean) species, (2) records with “cf.” in front of species names which indicates the specimens have some characters of a described species but also differences, which require comparisons with type material, and (3) records as “operational taxonomy units” (OTUs) which are considered to be unique species although further assessments are required to establish their taxonomic status.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponges As Bioindicators for Microparticulate Pollutants?*
    Environmental Pollution 268 (2021) 115851 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Pollution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants?* Elsa B. Girard a, 1, Adrian Fuchs b, Melanie Kaliwoda c, Markus Lasut d, Evelyn Ploetz b, * Wolfgang W. Schmahl a, c, e, Gert Worheide€ a, e, f, a Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat€ München, 80333, Munich, Germany b Department of Chemistry and Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat€ München, 81377, Munich, Germany c SNSB - Mineralogische Staatssammlung München, 80333, München, Germany d Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Sam Ratulangi University, Jalan Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado, 95115, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia e GeoBio-CenterLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat€ München, 80333, Munich, Germany f SNSB - Bayerische Staatssammlung für Palaontologie€ und Geologie, 80333, Munich, Germany article info abstract Article history: Amongst other threats, the world’s oceans are faced with man-made pollution, including an increasing Received 7 June 2020 number of microparticulate pollutants. Sponges, aquatic filter-feeding animals, are able to incorporate Received in revised form fine foreign particles, and thus may be a potential bioindicator for microparticulate pollutants. To address 14 September 2020 this question, 15 coral reef demosponges sampled around Bangka Island (North Sulawesi, Indonesia) Accepted 12 October 2020 were analyzed for the nature of their foreign particle content using traditional histological methods, Available online 20 October 2020 advanced light microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Sampled sponges accumulated and embedded the very fine sediment fraction (<200 mm), absent in the surrounding sand, in the ectosome (outer epithelia) Keywords: fi fi Sponge and spongin bers (skeletal elements), which was con rmed by two-photon microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • From Northern Bass Strait, Southern Australia
    31 August 1989 Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 50(1): 1-242 (1989) ISSN 0814-1827 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1989.50.01 DEMOSPONGIAE (PORIFERA) FROM NORTHERN BASS STRAIT, SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA By Felix Wiedenmayer Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Museum of Victoria, Swanston Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Present address: Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Agustinergasse 2, 4001 Basel, Switzerland Abstract Wiedenmayer, F., 1989. Demospongiae from northern Bass Strait, southern Australia. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 50(1): 1-242. Eighty-four species (in 47 genera) in the Museum of Victoria, Melbourne, are described and illustrated. Of these, 21 species are described as new: Ancorina repens, A. suina, Stelletta arenitecta, Rhabdastrella cordata, R. intermedia, Tetilla praecipua, Latrunculia hallmanni, Pseudaxinella decipiens, Reniochalina sectilis, Rhaphoxya felina, Clathria wilsoni, Echinoclathria egena, Psammoclema bitextum, P. fissuratum, P. goniodes, P. radiatum, P. stipitatum, P. van- soesti, Callyspongia persculpta, C. toxifera, and Thorecta glomerosus. Eighteen records are new for the Maugean province, and three (Phorbas tenacior, Darwinella gardineri, and Gel- liodes incrustans) are new for the Australian fauna. The following revisions depart from those adopted in Wiedenmayer et al. (in press). The family Desmacididae is divided into Desmacidi- nae and Stylotellinae, and the genera Stylotella ( = Batzella), Phoriospongia ( = Chondropsis), and Psammoclema ( = Psammopemma, Sarcocornea) are assigned to the latter. Dactylia, Chalinopsilla and Arenosclera are synonymised with Callyspongia. Thorectandra is synonymised with Thorecta. Dendrilla cactos (Selenka) is a senior synonym of D. rosea Lendenfeld. The composition of this collection is even, with respect to the known demosponge fauna of Victoria and Tasmania. Its zoogeographic affinity is essentially Indo-West Pacific and relictic Tethyan, its provincial endemism high, and its overlap with the Antarctic/Subantarctic fauna almost nil.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Metabolites from the Marine Sponge Genus Phyllospongia
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Previously Published Works Title Secondary Metabolites from the Marine Sponge Genus Phyllospongia. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6600n2ws Journal Marine drugs, 15(1) ISSN 1660-3397 Authors Zhang, Huawei Dong, Menglian Wang, Hong et al. Publication Date 2017-01-06 DOI 10.3390/md15010012 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California marine drugs Review Secondary Metabolites from the Marine Sponge Genus Phyllospongia Huawei Zhang 1,*, Menglian Dong 1, Hong Wang 1 and Phillip Crews 2 1 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China; [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (H.W.) 2 Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-571-8832-0903 Academic Editor: Vassilios Roussis Received: 15 November 2016; Accepted: 29 December 2016; Published: 6 January 2017 Abstract: Phyllospongia, one of the most common marine sponges in tropical and subtropical oceans, has been shown to be a prolific producer of natural products with a broad spectrum of biological activities. This review for the first time provides a comprehensive overview of secondary metabolites produced by Phyllospongia spp. over the 37 years from 1980 to 2016. Keywords: marine sponge; Phyllospongia sp.; secondary metabolites; bioactivity 1. Introduction Marine sponges, as very primitive animals, are widely distributed in the oceans from tropic to polar regions. Growing evidence indicates that these animals are the most prolific source of natural products as pharmaceutical leads [1–3]. Marine sponges possess a large variety of secondary metabolites with diverse chemical structures, such as terpenoids [4], macrolides [5], and sterols [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Key Species Groups in the East Marine Region
    Australian Museum Description of Key Species Groups in the East Marine Region Final Report – September 2007 1 Table of Contents Acronyms........................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Images ................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 6 2 Corals (Scleractinia)............................................................................................................ 12 3 Crustacea ............................................................................................................................. 24 4 Demersal Teleost Fish ........................................................................................................ 54 5 Echinodermata..................................................................................................................... 66 6 Marine Snakes ..................................................................................................................... 80 7 Marine Turtles...................................................................................................................... 95 8 Molluscs ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Phylogeny of Dictyoceratid Sponges
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Open Access LMU Received: 15 May 2019 | Revised: 6 September 2019 | Accepted: 16 September 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12351 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Soft sponges with tricky tree: On the phylogeny of dictyoceratid sponges Dirk Erpenbeck1,2 | Adrian Galitz1 | Merrick Ekins3,4 | Steve de C. Cook5 | Rob W. M. van Soest6 | John N. A. Hooper3,7 | Gert Wörheide1,2,8 1Department of Earth- and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology, Abstract Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Keratose (horny) sponges constitute a very difficult group of Porifera in terms of Munich, Germany taxonomy due to their paucity of diagnostic morphological features. (Most) kera- 2GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität München, Munich, Germany tose sponges possess no mineral skeletal elements, but an arrangement of organic 3Biodiversity Program, Queensland (spongin) fibers, with little taxonomic or phylogenetic information. Molecular phylo- Museum, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia genetics have targeted this evolutionary and biochemically important lineage numer- 4School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia ous times, but the conservative nature of popular markers combined with ambiguous 5Formerly Department of Zoology, School of identification of the sponge material has so far prevented any robust phylogeny. In Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, the following study, we provide a phylogenetic hypothesis of the keratose order Auckland, New Zealand
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,On the Molecular Phylogeny of Sponges (Porifera)
    Zootaxa 1668: 107–126 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) On the molecular phylogeny of sponges (Porifera)* DIRK ERPENBECK and GERT WÖRHEIDE1 Courant Research Center Geobiology, Georg–August–Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany & Biodi- versity Program, Queensland Museum, 4101 South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 1 Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]–goettingen.de *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . 107 Introduction . 108 The phylogenetic position of Porifera within the Metazoa . 109 Class–level problems in Porifera taxonomy . 109 Calcarea . 110 Hexactinellida . 112 Demosponges (sensu stricto) . 112 Demosponge higher phylogeny . 112 Spirophorida . 114 Astrophorida . 114 Chondrosida . 114 Hadromerida . 114 Hadromerid families . 114 Suberitidae . 115 Poecilosclerida . 115 Poecilosclerida suborders . 115 Raspailiidae . 116 Podospongiidae . 116 Haplosclerida . 116 Spongillina (freshwater sponges) . 116 Marine Haplosclerida . 117 Halichondrida . 117 Halichondrida families . 117 Agelasida . 118 Verongida . 118 Dictyoceratida . 118 Dendroceratida . 119 Outlook . 119 Acknowledgements . 121 References . 121 Abstract In the past decade molecular genetic markers have been introduced for research on the evolution and systematics of sponges. Historically, sponges have been difficult to classify due to lack of complex characters with the result that hypothesised phylogenetic relationships for various sponge taxa have changed rapidly over the past few years. Here, we summarize the current status of systematic and phylogenetic hypotheses proposed for sponges. We discuss the relation- Accepted by Z.-Q. Zhang: 28 Nov. 2007; published: 21 Dec. 2007 107 ships among the three classes, Calcarea (calcareous sponges), Hexactinellida (glass sponges) and Demospongiae, as well as those among the members within each class.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Variation in the Microbiome of the Ecologically Important Sponge, Carteriospongia Foliascens
    Biogeographic variation in the microbiome of the ecologically important sponge, Carteriospongia foliascens Heidi M. Luter1, Stefanie Widder2, Emmanuelle S. Botté3, Muhammad Abdul Wahab4, Stephen Whalan5, Lucas Moitinho-Silva6, Torsten Thomas6 and Nicole S. Webster3 1 NAMRA and the Research Institute for the Environment & Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia 2 CUBE, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 3 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Crawley Western Australia, Australia 5 Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia 6 Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation and School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia ABSTRACT Sponges are well known for hosting dense and diverse microbial communities, but how these associations vary with biogeography and environment is less clear. Here we compared the microbiome of an ecologically important sponge species, Carteriospongia foliascens, over a large geographic area and identified environmental factors likely responsible for driving microbial community differences between inshore and offshore locations using co-occurrence networks (NWs). The microbiome of C. foliascens exhibited exceptionally high microbial richness, with more than 9,000 OTUs identified at 97% sequence similarity. A large biogeographic signal was evident at the OTU level despite similar phyla level diversity being observed across all geographic locations. The C. foliascens bacterial community was primarily comprised of Gammaproteobacteria (34:2% ± 3:4%) and Cyanobacteria Submitted 6 August 2015 (32:2% ± 3:5%), with lower abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Accepted 3 November 2015 Published 17 December 2015 unidentified Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Metabolites from the Marine Sponge Genus Phyllospongia
    marine drugs Review Secondary Metabolites from the Marine Sponge Genus Phyllospongia Huawei Zhang 1,*, Menglian Dong 1, Hong Wang 1 and Phillip Crews 2 1 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China; [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (H.W.) 2 Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-571-8832-0903 Academic Editor: Vassilios Roussis Received: 15 November 2016; Accepted: 29 December 2016; Published: 6 January 2017 Abstract: Phyllospongia, one of the most common marine sponges in tropical and subtropical oceans, has been shown to be a prolific producer of natural products with a broad spectrum of biological activities. This review for the first time provides a comprehensive overview of secondary metabolites produced by Phyllospongia spp. over the 37 years from 1980 to 2016. Keywords: marine sponge; Phyllospongia sp.; secondary metabolites; bioactivity 1. Introduction Marine sponges, as very primitive animals, are widely distributed in the oceans from tropic to polar regions. Growing evidence indicates that these animals are the most prolific source of natural products as pharmaceutical leads [1–3]. Marine sponges possess a large variety of secondary metabolites with diverse chemical structures, such as terpenoids [4], macrolides [5], and sterols [6]. Therefore, it has greatly attracted the attention of natural product chemists and pharmaceutical experts around the world to carry out chemical research for the new drug discovery. Phyllospongia (Porifera, Demospongiae, Dictyoceratida, Thorectidae) is one of the most common marine sponges in tropical and subtropical areas, including the Indian Ocean, the Great Barrier Reef, Papua New Guinea, the South China Sea, the South Pacific, and the Red Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Water Sponges from the Investigator Islands
    A catalogue of shallow-water sponges from the Investigator Islands, South Australia S.J. Sorokin, T.C.D. Laperousaz and S.L. Drabsch Report to Nature Foundation SA Inc. SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication number: F2007/000789-1 SARDI Research Report Series number: 258 December 2007 Investigator Islands Sponges This publication may be cited as: Sorokin, S.J., Laperousaz, T and Drabsch, S. (2007) A catalogue of shallow-water sponges from the Investigator Islands, South Australia. Report to Nature Foundation SA Inc. SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication Number F2007/000789-1. SARDI Research Report Series Number 258. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 82075400 Facsimile: (08) 82075406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au Disclaimer The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Editorial Board. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free form errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. 2007 SARDI Aquatic Sciences This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior permission from the author. Printed in Adelaide: December 2007 SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication Number F2007/000789-1 SARDI Research Report Series Number 258 Authors: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Structure and Convergent Evolution of the Global Sponge Microbiome
    ARTICLE Received 1 Nov 2015 | Accepted 9 May 2016 | Published 16 Jun 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11870 OPEN Diversity, structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome Torsten Thomas1, Lucas Moitinho-Silva1, Miguel Lurgi2, Johannes R. Bjo¨rk3,4, Cole Easson5, Carmen Astudillo-Garcı´a6, Julie B. Olson7, Patrick M. Erwin8, Susanna Lo´pez-Legentil8, Heidi Luter9, Andia Chaves-Fonnegra10, Rodrigo Costa11, Peter J. Schupp12, Laura Steindler13, Dirk Erpenbeck14, Jack Gilbert15,16, Rob Knight17, Gail Ackermann17, Jose Victor Lopez10, Michael W. Taylor6, Robert W. Thacker18, Jose M. Montoya3, Ute Hentschel19 & Nicole S. Webster20 Sponges (phylum Porifera) are early-diverging metazoa renowned for establishing complex microbial symbioses. Here we present a global Porifera microbiome survey, set out to establish the ecological and evolutionary drivers of these host–microbe interactions. We show that sponges are a reservoir of exceptional microbial diversity and major contributors to the total microbial diversity of the world’s oceans. Little commonality in species composition or structure is evident across the phylum, although symbiont communities are characterized by specialists and generalists rather than opportunists. Core sponge microbiomes are stable and characterized by generalist symbionts exhibiting amensal and/or commensal interactions. Symbionts that are phylogenetically unique to sponges do not disproportionally contribute to the core microbiome, and host phylogeny impacts complexity rather than composition of the symbiont community. Our findings support a model of independent assembly and evolution in symbiont communities across the entire host phylum, with convergent forces resulting in analogous community organization and interactions. 1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation and School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
    [Show full text]