DOCSLIB.ORG

151. Protomyces Inacyei. Bot. Zool., 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
151. Protomyces Inacyei. Bot. Zool., 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. ADLER, H. 1877. Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Cynipiden. Dtsch. ent. Z., 21. 2. ADLER, H. 1881. Uber Generationswechsel der Eichengallwespen. Z. wiss. Zool. 35: 151. 3. AKAI, S. 1939. On the anatomy of galls on Crepis japonica caused by Protomyces inacyei. Bot. Zool., 7: 875-882. 4. AKAI, S. 1939. Studies on the pathological anatomy of the hypertro­ phied buds of Camellia japonica caused by Exobasidium camelliae. Bot. Mafi., 53 (627): 118-125, fig. 1-6. S. AKAI, S. 1940. On the pathological histology of the deformed petioles and leaves of Camellia japonica caused by an undescribed species of Exobasidium. Ann. phytopath. Soc. Japan, 10 (2/3): 104-105, fig. 1-4. 6. ALBRECHT, W. A. & L. M. TURK, 1930. Leguminosenbakterien mit Bezug auf Licht und Lebensdauer. Missouri agric. expo Sta. Res. Bull. 132. 7. ALFIERI, A. 1921. Sopra una specie probabilmente nuovo di Afide simbionte. Boll. Lab. Zool. Ent. Agr. Scuol. Sup. Agr. Portici, 14: 18-31, fig. 1, pI. i. 8. ALICANTE, M. M. 1926. The viability ofthe nodule bacteria of Legume outside of the plant. Soil Sci., 21: 27-52, 93-114. 9. ALLISON, W. F. E., C. A. LUDWING, S. R. HOOVER & F. MINOR, 1940. Biochemical nitrogen fixation studies. 1. Evidence for limited oxy­ gen supply within the nodule. II. Comparative respiration of nodules and roots, including non-legume roots. Bot. Gaz., 101 (3): 513-534, 534-549. 10. ALPANT, A. 1942. Uber einige Gallen aus dem Pamuku-Tal bei An­ kara. Collegium, 1942 (872): 417-424, fig. 11. 11. ALTENBURG, E. 1947. Tumor formation in relation to the origin of viruses. Amer. Anat., 81 (796): 72-76. 12. ANDERS, F. 1955. Zur biologischen Charakterisierung der gallenindu­ zierenden Substanz aus dem Speicheldrtisensekret der Reblaus Viteus (=Phylloxera) vitifolii Shimer. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges. Er­ langen, 421-428,.ftg. 9. 13. ANDERS, F. 1957. Uber die gallenerregenden Agenzien der Reblaus Viteus (=Phylloxera) vitifolii Shimer. Vitis, 1: 121-124. 14. ANDERS, F. 1957. Reblaus- und co1chicin-induzierte Keulenbildung an der Wurzel von Vitis-Samlingen. Naturwissenschaften, 44: 95-96. 15. ANDERS, F. 1958. Aminosauren als gallenerregende Stoffe der Reblaus Viteus (=Phylloxera) vitifolii Shimer. Experientia 14: 62-63. 16. ANDERS, F. 1958. Uber die Morphogenese der Gallen von Viteus viti­ folii Shimer (=Phy!loxera vastatrix). Marcellia, 30 (SuppI.): 103- 112, fig. 4. 17. ANDERS, F. 1958. Das galleninduzierende Prinzip der Reblaus (Viteus vitifollii Shimer.). Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges. Leipzig, 355-363, fig. 10. 18. ANDERS, F. 1960. Untersuchungen tiber das cecidogene Prinzip der 336 Reblaus Viteus (=Phylloxera) vitifolii Shimer. 1. Untersuchungen an der Reblausgalle. Bioi. Zbl., 79: 47-58; II. Biologische Unter­ suchungen tiber das galleninduzierende Sekret der Reblaus. ibidem, 79: 679-700. 19. ANDERS, F. 1961. Untersuchungen tiber das cecidogene Princip der Reblaus Viteus (=Phylloxera) vitifolii Shimer. III. Biochemische Untersuchungen tiber das galleninduzierende Agenz. Bioi. Zbl., 80 (2): 199-233, fig. 16. 20. ANDERSON, J. A., W. H. PETERSON & E. E. FRED, 1928. The produc­ tion of pyruvic acid by certain nodule bacteria of Leguminosae. Soil Sci., 25: 123-737. 21. ANDRE, E. 1888. Relations des fourmis avec les pucerons et les gall insectes. Bull. d'Insec. Agric. Ann., 7: 3-7. 22. ApPEL, O. 1904. Beispiele zur mikroskopischen Untersuchung von Pflanzenkrankheiten. Berlin, J. Springer, pp. 48, fig. 53. 23. ARCIZEWSKI, W., M. BOEHM & W. KOPACZEWSKI, 1928. Studien tiber capillarelektrische Erscheinungen. Bakterienantagonismus und Krebsproblem. Z. Krebsforsch., 27 (3): 273-289, fig. 5. 24. ARNAUDI, C. 1926. Sull'immunita acquista nei vegetali. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Milano, 64 (3/4). 25. ARNAUDI, C. 1927. A propos de quelques experiences sur l'immunite acquise des vegetaux. Rev. Path. veg. Ent. Agric., 14 (2): 703-712. 26. ARNAUDI, C. 1928. Nuova esperienze sulla vaccinazione delle piante. Riv. Patol. Veg., 18 (7/8): 167-168. 27. ARNAUDI, C. & G. VENTURELLI, 1934. L'azione del radio sui tumori vegetali. Riv. Bioi., 16 (1): 5-23, pI. i. 28. ARRUDA, S. C. 1943. Obserfac6es sobre algumas d6encas do eucalipto no Estado de S. Paulo. Biologica, Sao Paulo, 9 (6): 140-144, pLi. 29. ARZBERGER, E. G. 1910. The fungus root-tubercles of Ceanothus americanus, Elaeagnus argentea and Myrica cerifera. Ann. Rep. Missouri bot. Garden, S. Louis, 21: 60-702, pI. vi-xiv. 30. ASHMEAD, W. H. 1899. The largest oak gall in the world and its para­ sites. Ent. News, 10: 193. 31. ASHMEAD, W. H. 1904. Classification ofChalcid flies or the superfamily Chalcidoidea. Mem. Carnegie Mus., 1 (4): 225-557. 32. ASHMEAD, W. H. 1903. Classification of Cynipoidea. Psyche, 10: 7, 59, 740. 33. ATANASOFF, D. 1925. DiploPhosphora disease of cereals. Phytopatholo­ gy, 15: 71-40. 34. ATKINSON, F. T. 1889. Nematode in root-galls. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.,5:2,87. 35. AULER, H. 1924. Zur Histogenese der Tumefaciens-Geschwtilste an der Sonnenblume. Z ... Krebsforsch., 21: 354-360, fig. 2. 36. AULER, H. 1925. Uber chemische und anaerobe Tumorbildung bei Pflanzen. Z. Krebsforsch., 22: 393-403. 37. BACCARINI, P. 1893. Sopra un curiosa cecidio della Capparis spinosa. M alpighia, 7: 405. 38. BACCARINI, P. 1909. Sui micocecidii od "Ambrosiagallen." Bull. Soc. Bot. Ital., 137. 39. BACCARINI, P. 1913. Primi appunti intorno alla biologia dello Exoba­ sidium lauri Gev. Nuovo Giorn. bot. Ital., (NS) 20 (2): 282-307. 40. BACHMANN, E. 1920. Uber Pilzgallen auf Flechten. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges., 38: 333-338. 41. BACHMANN, E. 1927. Die Pilzgallen einiger Cladonien. II. Arch. Pro­ tistenk., 59 (2): 373-476, fig. 48. 42. BACHMANN, E. 1928. Die Pilzgallen einiger Cladonien. III. Arch. Protistenk., 62 (2/3): 267-308, fig. 52. 337 43. BACHMANN, E. 1928. Die Pilzgallen einiger Cladonien. IV. Blattgallen und bebHitterte Gallen. Arch. Protistenk., 64 (1/2): 109-151. 44. BACHMANN, E. 1929. Tiergallen auf Flechten. Arch. Protistenk., 66 (1): 61-103, fig. 30. 45. BACHMANN, E. 1929. Pilz-, Tier- und Scheingallen auf Flechten. Arch. Protistenk., 66 (3): 459-514, fig. 60. 46. BACHMANN, E. 1930. Die Gallen zweier Laubflechten. Arch. Protistenk., 71 (2): 323-360, fig. 34. 47. BACHMANN, E. 1934. Pilz-, Tier- und Scheingallen auf Flechten. Arch. Protistenk., 82: 23-44, fig. 29. 48. BACHMANN, E. 1934. Scheingallen auf Physcia stellaris (Linn.) Nyi. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges., 52: 80-86, fig. 1. 49. BAGNALL, R. S. 1928. On some new genera and species of Australian Thysanoptera (Tubulifera) with special reference to gall species. M arcellia, 25: 184-203. 50. BAIS, M. P. 1933. Dipterocecidie foliaire (Vicia cracca L. attaque par Perrisia viciae Kieff.), ses caracteres anatomiques et leur comparison avec ceux du fruit. Rev. gen. bot. Paris, 45: 5-19, fig. 1--4. 51. BAKER, A. C. 1917. On the Chinese gall. Ent. News, 28: 385, pI. xxvi. 52. BALDASSERONI, V. 1929. Osservazioni biologische surghi afidi in rapporto al tumoro batterico del pino di Aleppo. Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sperim., 4 (4): 393-395. 52a. BALLY, 1912. Zytologische Studienan Chytridieen.Jb. wiss. Bot., 50: 95. 53. BANCROFT, T. L. 1890. Hymenopterous galls found on Acacia cun­ ninghami Hook. and Acacia penninervis Sieb. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, Sydney, (2) 5: 680. 54. BANFIELD, W. M. 1935. Studies in cellular pathology. 1. Effects of cane gall bacteria upon gall tissue cells of the black raspberry. Bot. Gaz., 97 (2): 193-238, fig. 1, pI. i. 55. BARGAGLI-PETRUCCI, G. 1907. Cecidi della Cina. Nuovo Giorn. bot. Ital. (NS) 14: 235-245, fig. 7, pI. i. 56. BARTHEL, C. 1921. Contributions a la recherche des causes de la for­ mation des bacteroides chez les nodosites des Legumineuses. Ann. I nst. Pasteur, 35: 634-646, fig. 6. 57. BARTLETT, A. W. 1928. Olpidiumradicicolum de Wildeman and the hybridization on nodules of swedes. Trans. Brit. mycol. Soc., 13 (3/4): 221-238, pI. ii. 58. BARTON, E. S. 1891. On the occurrence of galls on Rhodymenia pal­ mata Grev. J. Bot., 26: 65. 59. BARTON, E. S. 1892. On malformations of Ascophyllum and Desmares­ tia. Brit. M~ts. mycol. Mem., 1: 21. 60. BARTON, E. S. 1901. On certain galls on Furcellaria and Chondrus. J. Bot., 39: 49. 61. BASSETT, H. F. 1880. The structure and development of certain Hymenopterous galls. Amer. Ent., 3: 284. 62. BASTIAN. 1865. Monograph of the Anguillulidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. London (ZooI.) 25.: 73-184. 63. BAUCH, R. 1942. Uber Beziehungen zwischen polyploidisierenden, carcinogenen und phytohormonalen Substanzen. Aus16sung von Gigas-Mutationen der Hefe durch pflanzliche Wuchsstoffe. Natur­ wissenschajten, 27: 420-421. 64. BAUCH, R. 1952. Das Problem der Mitosengift- und Wuchsstoffekeulen bei der Wurzel. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges., 65: 4-6. 65. BAUDYS, E. 1917. Massenhaftes Auftreten von Gallenerzeugern im Jahre 1910. Z. I nsektenbiol., 13: 251. 66. BAWDEN, F. C. 1913. Plant viruses and virus diseases. 2 ed. Waltham, Mass. 338 67. BAWDEN, F. C. 1951. Viruses: Molecules or organisms. Discovery, 12 (2): 41. 68. BEARD, H. H. 1935. Cancer as a problem in metabolism. Arch. intern. Med., 56: 1143-1170. 69. BECHER, E. 1917. Die fremddienstliche ZweckmiiBigkeit der Pflanzen­ galIen und die Hypothese eines iiberindividuellen Seelischen. Leipzig. 70. BECHHOLD, H. & L. SMITH, 1927. Das Tumefaciensplastem. Z. Krebs­ jorsch., 25 (1): 97-104, fig. 3. 71. BEcK, E. G. 1946. A study of Solidago gall caused by Eurosta solidagi­ nis. Amer. J. Bot., 33: 228. 72. BEGUINOT, A. 1903. Studio anatomico di due cecidii del genere Cuscuta. Marcellia, 2: 47~62, pI.).-ii. 73. BEI}ERINCK, M. W. 1877. Uber Pflanzengallen. Bot. Ztg., 35. 74. BEIJERINcK, M. W. 1877. Over Gallen aan Cruciferen. Nederl. kruidk. Arch., (2) 2: 164. 75. BEI]ERINCK, M. W. 1882. Die ersten Entwicklungsphasen einiger Cynipidengallen. Amsterdam. 76. BEIJERINcK, M. W. 1885. Die Galle von Cecidomyia poae auf Poa nemoralis. Bot. Ztg., 43: .:105. 77. BEIJERINcK, M. W. 1888. Uber das Cecidium von Nematus capreae auf Salix amygdalina.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Their Aphid Partners (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Mashhad Region, Razavi Khorasan Province, with New Records of Aphids and Ant Species for Fauna of Iran
    ISSN 0973-1555(Print) ISSN 2348-7372(Online) HALTERES, Volume 6, 4-12, 2015 ZOHREH SADAT MORTAZAVI, HUSSEIN SADEGHI, NIHAT AKTAC, ŁUKASZ DEPA AND LIDA FEKRAT Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and their aphid partners (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Mashhad region, Razavi Khorasan Province, with new records of aphids and ant species for Fauna of Iran Zohreh Sadat Mortazavi1, Hussein Sadeghi1*, Nihat Aktac2, Łukasz Depa3, Lida Fekrat1 1 Department of Plant Protection, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran 2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Trakya University, Turkey 3Department of Zoology, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland (e-mail: *[email protected]) Abstract A survey of ant-aphid associations was conducted by collecting and identifying samples of ants and aphids found together on aphid host plants in Mashhad region, Razavi Khorasan province of Iran. As a result, a total of 21 ant species representing 13 genera and 3 subfamilies and 26 aphid species belonging to 13 genera from 37 host plant species were collected and identified. Among the recorded ant species, the genus Crematogaster with four species had the highest species richness. The three most frequent aphid attendant ants were Lepisiota nigra (Dalla Torre, 1893), Tapinoma erraticum (Latreille, 1798) and Crematogaster inermis Mayr, 1862 associated with 11, 10 and 9 aphid species, respectively. Eleven ant species were recorded from the colonies of one aphid species. Among the recorded ants, the species Crematogaster sordidula (Nylander, 1849) is new to Iranian ant fauna. This record increases the recorded ant-fauna of Iran to over 171 species. Among the identified aphid species, Aphis craccivora Koch, 1856 had the highest ant attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • ENTS S19 0001-0102.Pdf
    Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Supplement 19, 102 Seiten ISSN 0250‐4413 Ansfelden, 23. Dezember 2015 An annotated catalogue of the Iranian Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) Hassan GHAHARI, Mikdat DOĞANLAR, Pavittu M. SURESHAN & Hadi OSTOVAN Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Supplement 19, 005‐102 IS SN 0250‐44 13 Ansfelden, 23. Dezember 2015 An annotated catalogue of the Iranian Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) Hassan GHAHARI, Mikdat DOĞANLAR, Pavittu M. SURESHAN & Hadi OSTOVAN Abstract Parasitic wasps of the family Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) are one of the numerous and economically important groups of parasitoids. The species diversity of these beneficial insects in Iran is summarized in this paper. In total, 227 species from 114 genera and 16 subfamilies, Asaphinae (2 genera, 3 species), Cerocephalinae (2 genera, 4 species), Cleonyminae (7 genera, 8 species), Colotrechninae (1 genus, 1 species), Cratominae (1 genus, 1 species), Diparinae (1 genus, 1 species), Eunotinae (5 genera, 8 species), Macromesinae (1 genus, 1 species), Miscogasterinae (5 genera, 14 species), Ormocerinae (2 genera, 6 species), Panstenoninae (1 genus, 1 species), Pireninae (2 genus, 2 species), Pteromalinae (79 genera, 165 species), Spalangiinae (1 genus, 8 species), Sycophaginae (2 genera, 2 species), and Sycoryctinae (2 genera, 2 species) are listed in the fauna of Iran. K e y w o r d s : Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Pteromalidae, Catalogue, Distribution, Iran. Zusammenfassung Die parasitischen Wespen der Familie Pteromalidae
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Dilarang mereproduksi atau memperbanyak seluruh atau sebagian dari buku ini dalam bentuk atau cara apa pun tanpa izin tertulis dari penerbit. © Hak cipta dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 All Rights Reserved LIPI Press © 2017 Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) Pusat Penelitian Biologi Katalog dalam Terbitan (KDT) Temuan dan Pertelaan Jenis Baru Biota Indonesia 1967–2017: Sumbangsih LIPI untuk Sains/ Marlina Ardiyani, Dhian Dwibadra, Kartika Dewi, Mulyadi, Siti Meliah, Ibnu Maryanto, Himmah Rustiami, Deby Arifiani, Joeni Setijo Rahajoe, Hari Sutrisno, dan Atit Kanti. (Penyu- sun) –Jakarta: LIPI Press, 2017. xvi hlm. + 279 hlm.; 14,8 × 21 cm ISBN 978-979-799-913-1 (cetak) 978-979-799-911-7 (e-book) 1. Pertelaan 2. Jenis baru 3. Indonesia 570 Copyeditor : Nikita Daning Pratami dan Risma Wahyu Hartiningsih Proofreader : Martinus Helmiawan dan Fadly Suhendra Penata isi : Astuti Krisnawati dan Prapti Sasiwi Desainer sampul : Meita Safitri Cetakan pertama : Oktober 2017 Diterbitkan oleh: LIPI Press, anggota Ikapi Jln. Gondangdia Lama 39, Menteng, Jakarta 10350 Telp: (021) 314 0228, 314 6942. Faks.: (021) 314 4591 E-mail: [email protected] Website: lipipress.lipi.go.id LIPI Press @lipi_press Daftar Isi Daftar Gambar ...................................................................................... vii Pengantar Penerbit ................................................................................. xi Kata Pengantar ..................................................................................... xiii Prakata
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) with Special Reference of the Tribe Cirrospilini
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-Journal Portal - Research Center for Biology - Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) /... Treubia 2006 34 : 75 - 87 REVIEW OF PARASITIC WASP SUBFAMILY EULOPHINAE (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE) WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE OF THE TRIBE CIRROSPILINI Rosichon Ubaidillah Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences - LIPI, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km 46, Cibinong Science Centre, Bogor 16911, Indonesia Abstract The Cirrospilini LaSalle, 2000, belongs to the Eulophinae, along with Eulophini and Elasmini. This tribe consists of about 17 genera and almost 300 species, which are ectoparasitoids, mainly on Diptera, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera in semi-concealed situations. Some species may act as obligate or facultative hyperparasitoids and a few species are gall-formers. Historically, the genera included in the Cirrospilini have been placed in the Eulophinae and the Elachertinae sensu Ashmead, 1904. However, the relationships and the placement of genera into subfamilies or tribes have always been problematical. Based on the current evidence, it appears that the Cirrospilini is a monophyletic taxon and the sister-group of the Eulophini plus Elasmini. This paper summarizes the current taxonomic status and systematic background of the Cirrospilini. Key words: Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eulophidae, Eulophinae, tribe Cirrospilini, taxonomical review INTRODUCTION Since eulophids were first established as a family by Westwood (1840), the definition and recognition of the Eulophidae has been relatively straightforward. However, the relationship of the Eulophidae to other groups (e.g. Aphelinidae, Trichogrammatidae, Tetracampidae and Elasmidae) has remained unresolved. Most early chalcidologists (Walker, 1833, 1834; Förster, 1856) focused on two main groups within the Chalcidoidea: Tetrameri-group (members having four-segmented tarsi) and Pentameri-group (member having five-segmented tarsi).
    [Show full text]