Parallel Import & Impacts of Parallel Import in International Business

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parallel Import & Impacts of Parallel Import in International Business Parallel Import & Impacts of Parallel Import In International Business Submitted To, A.S.M. Saifur Rahman Lecturer Faculty of Business Administration Cox’s Bazar International University Submitted By, MD Rifat Zahir Bachelor of Business Administration 2nd Batch ID: 2014201004 Cox’s Bazar International University TH Date of Submission 18 fEBRUARY, 2016 18TH February 2016 A.S.M. Saifur Rahman Lecturer Faculty of Business Administration Cox’s Bazar International University Subject: To submit an assignment report on “Parallel Importing & It’s Impact on International Business”. Dear Sir, This is to inform you that I have completed my study on “Parallel Importing & It’s Impact on International Business”. This study was assigned to me as a partial requirement of the “International Business” course in 5th semester. I have tried sincerely to comprehend and translate my knowledge in writing this assignment. I enjoyed this study and gladly attend any of your calls to clarify points, if necessary. In preparing this assignment, I have followed the instructions of yours. I will be glad to clarify any discrepancy that may arise. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, MD Rifat Zahir BBA 2ND Batch ID: 2014201004 Faculty of Business Administration Cox’s Bazar International University MD Rifat Zahir At the beginning, I would like to convey my sincere appreciation to the almighty Allah for giving me the strength & the ability to finish the task within the planned time. This assignment report is an accumulation of many people’s endeavors. So I would like to expressly sincere gratitude to everyone who contributed towards preparing & making this successfully. First of all, I would like to express my Sincere & Immense gratitude to my course teacher A. S. M. Saifur Rahman, Lecturer of Faculty of Business Administration, Cox’s Bazar International University. I am deeply indebted to him whole hearted supervision to me during the thesis period. His valuable suggestion & guideline helped me a lot to prepare the report in a well-organized manner. MD Rifat Zahir BBA 2ND Batch ID: 2014201004 Faculty of Business Administration Cox’s Bazar International University The theoretical aspects recognize the short-term benefits of parallel trade to importing countries in terms of lower products expenditures, provided that lower costs are transferred to the consumers of products. There are likely to be direct impact through lower product expenditures due to parallel imports entering the market at prices lower than the manufacturer's price. The level of such savings is a realistic question. Important factors in the level and distribution of any savings and resulting welfare effects are the regulatory conditions of the market and the payment mechanisms in place. To the extent that parallel trade puts competitive pressure on the originator price, thus producing price decreases or a deceleration of price increases, there will be indirect savings in products expenditures. From a theoretical point of view, however, the response to parallel importing in the international market may not necessarily be to enter into the competition. To what extent that happens is a realistic issue. In the longer term, it has been argued that research and development could suffer from reduced profits in the International Business sector, but it has also been shown that this is not necessarily the case under all circumstances. I NAME Page no EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I What are parallel imports? 1 The process of parallel imports 1 What is Exhaustion of Intellectual Property (IP) rights? 3 Debate on parallel imports 3 Impacts of Parallel Importing in International Business 4 Concluding Remarks 8 Bibliography 9 Parallel Importing & It’s Impact on International Business What are parallel imports? According to Wikipedia "A parallel import is a noncounterfeit product imported from another country without the permission of the intellectual property owner." According to World Trade Organization " When a product made legally (i.e. not pirated) abroad is imported without the permission of the intellectual property right-holder (e.g. the trademark or patent owner). Some countries allow this, others do not.” According to World Health Organization " Parallel imports are imports of a patented or trademarked product from a a country where it is already marketed.” Parallel imports (sometimes referred to as gray market goods) refer to branded goods that are imported into a market and sold there without the consent of the owner of the trademark in that market. Parallel imports often take place when there is the differential pricing of the same product either brand name or generic products in different markets (usually owing to local manufacturing costs or market conditions). Read The graph given below may help you understand the scenario clearly- So finally, we can say that When an importer finds a cheaper price of a good or equivalent good on the world market and imports the good instead of paying higher local prices. These imports tend to be outside authorized importer channels, and are often carried by ordinary tourists. Goods that do not incur heavy transportation costs are most at risk from parallel imports. Authorized retailers, who are not allowed to source goods from parallel importers, generally oppose this practice since it makes them non-competitive against unauthorized retailers who can source these relatively cheap goods. The process of parallel imports Case 1 Parallel importing is spreading from traditional to luxury and brand-name consumer products (wines, cameras, and watches) to industrial products. Industry sources estimate that parallel imports account for 10% of IBM‟s PC sales, 20% of Sharp‟s copier sales, and 20% to 30% of the world cosmetics and fragrances sales. 1 Parallel Importing & It’s Impact on International Business The following graph may help you to understand the scenario properly- Case 2 The second method of parallel importing is when a foreign manufacturer (e.g. German) licenses a company to be the exclusive importer of a product bearing a foreign name or trademark. supply chains in different countries, creating tension between the manufacturer and different distributors, which affects the manufacturer‟s overall profitability. The following graph may help you to understand the scenario properly- Case 3 Another way of parallel imports is the use of mail orders. This type of unauthorized channel is emerging with Internet development and is a very important source of parallel trade. Retailers and consumers can currently purchase products either from catalogs from large, local retailers or going directly to mail order houses in the different market. Anyone with a credit card and access to an Internet-linked computer can order CDs, software, books and whatever from overseas suppliers. E-commerce can be a good example of that. As we can download music, books, movies from the sites and the manufacturer of that product is being deprived of fair prices. 2 Parallel Importing & It’s Impact on International Business What is Exhaustion of Intellectual Property (IP) rights? Again, According to World Trade Organization " When a product made legally (i.e. not pirated) abroad is imported without the permission of the intellectual property right-holder (e.g. the trademark or patent owner). Some countries allow this, others do not.” In this definition, “intellectual property” word used by the WTO, which brings up the matter of “Exhaustion of IP rights”. Besides, they also mentioned that “Some countries allow this, others do not.” So I‟d like to clear the air a bit. Exhaustion of IP rights refers to the extent to which IP rights holders can control the distribution of their branded goods. According to the concept of exhaustion, once IP right holders sell in a particular jurisdiction a product to which their IP rights are attached, they must allow the resale of that product in that jurisdiction. The IP rights covering the product have been “exhausted” by the first sale. There are two types of exhaustion regimes: national (or regional) and international. National (or Regional) Exhaustion These regimes are followed by countries and regions that only allow trademarked goods that have been exhausted to be resold in the national or, in the case of the European Union (EU), a regional area that the goods are from. It does not allow for goods to be sold outside of those areas. International Exhaustion This regime is followed by countries and regions that allow trademarked goods that have been exhausted to be resold in regions other than the country or region of origin. Some countries use a hybrid approach that modifies one of the two basic types of exhaustion. For example, a country nominally applies the principle of international exhaustion but does place some limits on the goods that may be imported. The Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement explicitly states that this practice cannot be challenged under the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system and so neither effectively a matter of national discretion. Debate on parallel imports Once Again, According to World Trade Organization “When a product made legally (i.e. not pirated) abroad is imported without the permission of the intellectual property right-holder (e.g. the trademark or patent owner). Some countries allow this, others do not.” Once again I‟d like to denote the definition provided by the WTO, as we are going to discuss the impacts of Parallel Importing in International Trade. In their definition, the last part, they mentioned that “Some countries allow this, others do not.” So I‟d like to focus on this burning issue & provide a realistic judgment on the topic. Of course, the judgment will be from my own point of view. It has been argued that parallel import restrictions (PIRs) strengthen IP holders‟ control over distribution channels, thereby permitting market segmentation and leading to price discrimination. The third party (unauthorized) has an incentive to operate parallel imports due to the feasibility of price arbitrage.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Importation (Parallel Trade) in Pharmaceuticals
    IPI CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY FREEDOM Re-importation (Parallel Trade) in Pharmaceuticals By Jacob Arfwedson POLICY REPORT 182 JULY 2004 E S Supporters of parallel trade in pharmaceuticals argue that it lower prices, which is popular with consumers and cash-strapped governments. But in fact parallel trade reduces safety, since it represents an end-run around domestic inspection procedures. More importantly, re-importa- tion undermines intellectual property protection and hence incentives to invest in research and development of IP-based products; which will have ominous implications for consumers in the long-run. Re-importation (or parallel trade as it is known in Europe) occurs when products protected by patent, trademark or copyright are first placed into circulation on one market, then (re-) imported into a second market without the authorization of the original owner of the intellectual property rights (IPRs). Myriad products are re-imported, including automobiles, clothing, perfume and other consumer goods. This paper focuses on re-importation of pharmaceuticals, with a special focus on Europe. How- ever, the paper could not be timelier in the United States, where the House of Representatives voted in late July 2003 on re-importing Canadian prescription drugs into the US. This paper as- sesses whether parallel trade is generally valid, concluding that the net economic effects cannot be established empirically but that there may be significant long run harms to innovation if parallel trade grows indefinitely. IPRs are limited rights conferred by governments over certain products of the intellect (e.g. patents which protect inventions, copyrights which protect expressions of ideas and trademarks which protect brands).
    [Show full text]
  • State of Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement in Armenia
    State of intellectual property protection and enforcement in Armenia 2020 Supported by Implemented by Table of contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 5 About Editors ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 Contribution of IP system and IP protection to economic growth and development .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Importance of efficient IP system for economic growth and development ............. 13 1.2. Importance of IP protection for national economies ............................................... 15 Chapter 2. Current state of the IP system in Armenia ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 5-2012 Market Integration and (the Limits of) the First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law Irene Calboli [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Irene Calboli, Market Integration and (the Limits of) the First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1241 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/362 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARKET INTEGRATION AND (THE LIMITS OF) THE FIRST SALE RULE IN NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN TRADEMARK LAW Irene Calboli* I. INTRODUCTION The relationship between exclusive trademark rights and the free movement of goods across international borders has historically represented one of the most heated topics of discussion in the international trademark debate.' In a previous work published a few years ago, I analyzed this topic in the context of European trademark law and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).2 In this Article I * Associate Professor of Law and Director, Intellectual Property and Technology Program, Marquette University Law School; Spring 2011 CIPLIT Visiting Professor of Law, DePaul University College of Law. I would like to thank Eric Goldman for the invitation to speak at the "Exhaustion and First Sale in Intellectual Property" conference held at Santa Clara University School of Law on November 5, 2010, and for his insightful suggestions during the research and writing of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Patents Exemption Right As A
    AGAINST THE PLAGUE: EXEMPTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PATENT RIGHTS AS A BIOSECURITY STRATEGY Taiwo A. Oriola* I. INTRODUCTION Acts of terrorism involve threats to use or use of weapons of mass destruction to kill, maim, or destroy property by individuals, groups, or states1 mainly on political grounds, and for maximum political effects.2 Terror attacks are characterized by stealth, indiscriminate violence, and destruction meant to heighten people’s fears and concerns for their lives and property.3 As terrorism has increased, so have the number of counterterrorism strategies by governments around the world.4 However, terrorism is as old as mankind.5 * Cardiff Law School, and the ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability, & Society, University of Cardiff, United Kingdom. 1. An early example of a state-sponsored terrorist was the Roman emperor Nero, who ruled by fear, slaughtered many members of the nobility, and has been blamed for the burning of Rome. CINDY C. COMBS & MARTIN SLANN, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TERRORISM 201 (2002). Dysfunctional or anarchistic individuals or groups acting alone or in concert can perpetrate terrorist attacks. See Jonathan Glover, State Terrorism, in VIOLENCE, TERRORISM, AND JUSTICE 256, 257-60 (Raymond G. Frey & Christopher W. Morris eds., 1991) (contrasting historical state and independent terrorists, highlighting essential features of state-sponsored terrorism, and explaining why states commit acts of terrorism). 2. Political motivation has been described as “a necessary component to a definition of terrorism.” COMBS & SLANN, supra note 1, at 211. For examples of statutory definitions of terrorism, see Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001, Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Brief
    Court of Justice of the European Union Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne L – 2925 Luxembourg RE: Joint Cases C-253/20 Novartis AG v. Impexeco NV and C-254/20 Novartis AG v. PI Pharma NV September 28, 2020 Amicus Submission – International Trademark Association The International Trademark Association (“INTA”) has prepared this Submission in relation to the joint cases C-253/20 “Impexeco” Novartis AG v. Impexeco NV, and C-254/20 “PI Pharma”, Novartis AG v. PI Pharma NV, pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which request preliminary rulings under article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) referred by the Brussels Court of Appeal. A. INTA’s interest in the cases INTA is not a party in the cases and acknowledges that the CJEU does not have a procedure for accepting an amicus curiae intervention stricto sensu. INTA, however, believes that the joint cases are significant to the development of trademark law and presents itself as an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) in these matters, as it has done in the past (see Annex A listing previous amicus interventions by INTA before European courts). INTA hopes that this submission may be of assistance to the Court. B. About INTA INTA is a global association of brand owners and professionals dedicated to supporting trademarks and related intellectual property (IP) to foster consumer trust, economic growth, and innovation. Members include nearly 6,500 organizations, representing more than 34,350 individuals (trademark owners, professionals, and academics) from 185 countries, who benefit from the Association’s global trademark resources, policy development, education and training, and international network.
    [Show full text]
  • TPP Derechos C Parallel Imports and Exhaustion.Pdf
    Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) Intellectual Property Chapter Concerns COPYRIGHT, PARALLEL IMPORTS AND EXHAUSTION OF DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS Derechos Digitales - Chile Known proposal1 Article 4.2. Each Party shall provide to authors, performers, and producers of phonograms the right to authorize or prohibit the importation into that Party’s territory of copies of the work, performance, or phonogram made without authorization, or made outside that Party’s territory with the authorization of the author, performer, or producer of the phonogram.fn. 11 fn. 11 With respect to copies of works and phonograms that have been placed on the market by the relevant right holder, the obligations described in Article [4.2] apply only to books, journals, sheet music, sound recordings, computer programs, and audio and visual works (i.e., categories of products in which the value of the copyrighted material represents substantially all of the value of the product). Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Party may provide the protection described in Article [4.2] to a broader range of goods. The context • This proposal touches upon two copyright-related issues2: the right of parallel importation of copyrighted goods lawfully made abroad, and the exhaustion of distribution rights after first transfer of property. In effect, this creates a new exclusive right, without necessary support from research, precedent or previous international law. • Currently, no intellectual property treaty grants copyright holders an exclusive right to control the importation of works. Article 6(2) of the WCT, and Articles 8(2) and 12(2) of the WPPT, deal with the issue of the exhaustion of the right of distribution for authors, performers and producers of phonograms respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property Newsletter
    Intellectual Property Newsletter April 2012 Editorial Board IP Newsletter Hong Kong Please direct questions and comments regarding the Henry Wheare Intellectual Property newsletter to: [email protected] Verena von Bomhard London [email protected] Adam Cooke Adam Cooke [email protected] [email protected] Los Angeles Juliane Diefenbach Stephen H. Kay [email protected] [email protected] Leopold von Gerlach Madrid [email protected] Burkhart Goebel Raymond A. Kurz [email protected] [email protected] Milan Ted Mlynar Luigi Mansani [email protected] [email protected] Moscow Natalia Gulyaeva [email protected] Further Information Munich For advice and information on Hogan Lovells' Intellectual Matthias Koch Property practice please contact: [email protected] Alicante New York Verena von Bomhard Eric J. Lobenfeld [email protected] [email protected] Amsterdam Northern Virginia Bert Oosting Timothy J. Lyden [email protected] [email protected] Beijing Paris Deanna Wong Marie-Aimée de Dampierre [email protected] [email protected] Berlin Philadelphia Christoph Wagner Katherine R. Leibowitz [email protected] [email protected] Colorado Springs San Francisco William J. Kubida K.T. (Sunny) Cherian [email protected] [email protected] Denver Shanghai Clay C. James William Fisher [email protected] [email protected] Düsseldorf Tokyo Andreas von Falck Lloyd Parker [email protected] [email protected] Frankfurt Warsaw Nils Rauer Ewa Kacperek [email protected] [email protected] Hamburg Washington, D.C. Leopold von Gerlach Raymond A.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Importation: Economic and Social Welfare Dimensions
    Parallel Importation: Economic and social welfare dimensions Frederick M. Abbott June 2007 Prepared for the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) © 2007 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the private sector. International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.iisd.org/ Parallel Importation: Economic and social welfare dimensions By Frederick M. Abbott, Edward Ball Eminent Scholar Professor of International Law, Florida State University College of Law. June 2007 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Imports and Price Controls
    RAND Journal of Economics Vol. 39, No. 2, Summer 2008 pp. 378–402 Parallel imports and price controls ∗ Gene M. Grossman and ∗∗ Edwin L.-C. Lai Price controls create opportunities for international arbitrage. Many have argued that such arbitrage, if tolerated, will undermine intellectual property rights and dull the incentives for investment in research-intensive industries such as pharmaceuticals. We challenge this orthodox view and show, to the contrary, that the pace of innovation often is faster in a world with international exhaustion of intellectual property rights than in one with national exhaustion. The key to our conclusion is to recognize that governments will make different choices of price controls when parallel imports are allowed by their trade partners than they will when they are not. 1. Introduction Parallel trade occurs when a good protected by a patent, copyright, or trademark, having been legally purchased in one country, is exported to another without the authorization of the local owner of the intellectual property rights in the importing market (see Maskus, 2000b). Parallel trade represents a form of arbitrage whereby a legitimate product is shipped from the market intended by the intellectual property rights holder to another where it commands a higher price. Like other forms of arbitrage, parallel imports (also known as “gray-market imports” or “reimports”) respond to international price differences that result from retailer price discrimination, vertical pricing restraints, or national differences in government price controls. The propriety of parallel trade is a matter of intense policy debate in a number of countries and in the World Trade Organization (WTO).
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Exclusivity in U.S. Copyright and Trademark Law Christine Haight Farley American University Washington College of Law, [email protected]
    American University Washington College of Law Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law Legal Studies Research Papers Scholarship & Research 2014 Territorial Exclusivity in U.S. Copyright and Trademark Law Christine Haight Farley American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_legsrp Recommended Citation Farley, Christine Haight, Territorial Exclusivity in U.S. Copyright and Trademark Law (March 17, 2014). “Territorial Exclusivity in U.S. Copyright and Trademark Law,” in Distribution des Intangibles - La Propriété Intellectuelle dans le Commerce des Nouveaux Biens (Pierre-Emmanuel Moyse, ed, Éditions Thémis 2014), p. 45. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship & Research at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Legal Studies Research Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. American University Washington College of Law Washington College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-30 TERRITORIAL EXCLUSIVITY IN U.S. COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK LAW Christine Haight Farley This paper can be downloaded without charge from The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2443395 TERRITORIAL EXCLUSIVITY IN U.S. COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK LAW Christine
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property and Technology News Is Published in the North America, Asia Pacific and EMEA Regions
    Augmented reality and Intellectual Property virtual reality: IP considerations DLA Piper launches global and Technology News Artificial Intelligence practice PERSPECTIVES • ANALYSIS • VISIONARY IDEAS ITC update Supreme Court Corner The Russian Supreme Court clarifies IP legislation ISSUE 43 / Q3 2019 / ATTORNEY ADVERTISING IPT NEWS Editor’s Column We are excited to bring you this 43rd issue of IPT As a firm, DLA Piper is proud to announce the launch News. Inside are thought-provoking articles about of a new global practice group focused on artificial ITC Section 337, intellectual property rights in intelligence. And, adding depth and strength to our augmented and virtual reality, and two cases we are West Coast patent practice, we welcome two new following in the Supreme Court – Iancu v. Brunetti, patent prosecution partners to IPT in Silicon Valley: which held that the Lanham Act’s prohibition Christopher Mooney, who focuses on strategic patent Matt Gruenberg on the registration of “immoral or scandalous” counseling, patent prosecution and patent litigation, Partner trademarks violates the First Amendment, and and Maria Swiatek, who focuses on cross-border Intellectual Property Return Mail Inc. v. USPS, which held that the federal prosecution and portfolio management for high and Technology government is not a “person” capable of filing a technology, energy and life sciences clients. covered business method review petition under I hope you will enjoy this issue of IPT News. the America Invents Act. You will also find an article about Ruling No. 10, in which the Russian Supreme Court has clarified its IP law, and a look at potential “influencer” liabilities arising from promotions on Instagram.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Trade, Monopoly and Competitiveness: Appraising the Legal Rights of Franchisees Against Parallel Imports in Nigeria
    Fair Trade, Monopoly and Competitiveness: appraising the Legal Rights of Franchisees against Parallel Imports in Nigeria Nigeria‟s population of about 170 million, with a demography that is skewed in favour of the youth makes it a choice market for most manufacturers, particularly manufacturers of fast moving consumer goods. It is no news that of major concern for manufacturers seeking to market their products in Nigeria is the wide scale of intellectual property rights violations through the activities of copyright pirates, counterfeiters as well as weak legal and regulatory framework for the protection and enforcement of these rights. However, of equal concern to manufacturers, particularly foreign manufacturers, is “parallel imports”, a common practice amongst dealers of imported goods which, unfortunately, is not expressly regulated by any of the intellectual property statutes in Nigeria. Parallel Import occurs where a person other than the person authorized by the proprietor of a trademark (“the franchisor”) imports goods with the trademark into another country or region (the “target market”) in which the proprietor already has authorized/licensed dealer(s) (“the franchisee(s)”) for the purpose of selling same therein, without the authorization or permission of the franchisor or the franchisee. In practice, the franchisee is appointed through a contractual arrangement as the distributor for the goods within the target market. Parallel import violates the existing franchise and essentially makes the third- party importer an unfair competitor to the franchisee for market share. Opinions however differ from country to country and from region to region, as to the propriety or legality of parallel imports and whether a franchisor or the franchisee for his goods has legal right to claim against or restrict the trade and activities of a parallel importer.
    [Show full text]